1
|
de Barros JWF, Villela E Silva P, da Silva GV, da Silva KP, Borges CDS, Mueller A, Valencise L, Pupo AS, Kempinas WDG. Rosuvastatin exposure in female Wistar rats alters uterine contractility and do not show evident (anti)estrogenic effects. Drug Chem Toxicol 2021; 45:2233-2245. [PMID: 33934680 DOI: 10.1080/01480545.2021.1919139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Statins are 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor drugs that lead to serum-cholesterol-lowering effects. Rosuvastatin, a third-generation statin, has shown better results in reducing cholesterol concentrations when compared to other widely prescribed statins. Recent studies by our group reported that rosuvastatin impairs reproductive function in rats possibly by disrupting the reproductive-endocrine axis. In this study, we evaluated whether rosuvastatin presents estrogenic or antiestrogenic effects, by an in vivo uterotrophic assay in rats, and investigated the direct effect of this drug upon rat uterine tissue contractility both in non-gravid and gravid periods. Rosuvastatin exposure in vivo at doses of 0 (control), 3, and 10 mg/kg/d was not associated with estrogenic or antiestrogenic effects on uterine tissue. However, in vivo (doses of 0, 3, and 10 mg/kg/d) and ex vivo (concentrations of 0, 1, 10, and 100 µg/mL) exposures to this drug were related to alterations in uterine basal contraction pattern. Furthermore, in vivo and ex vivo rosuvastatin exposures potentially modulate the action of uterine contraction inducers carbachol, norepinephrine, and prostaglandin E2. Thus, rosuvastatin can affect uterine physiology not necessarily by an endocrine mechanism related to the estrogen signaling, but possibly by its pleiotropic effects, with indirect tissue and cellular interactions, since in vivo and ex vivo exposures of uterine fragments to rosuvastatin presented different responses in uterine contractile parameters, which require further studies upon the precise mechanism of action of this drug in female reproductive function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Willian Franco de Barros
- Department of Structural and Functional Biology, Institute of Biosciences, Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Biology and Toxicology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil
| | - Patrícia Villela E Silva
- Department of Structural and Functional Biology, Institute of Biosciences, Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Biology and Toxicology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil
| | - Gustavo Venâncio da Silva
- Department of Structural and Functional Biology, Institute of Biosciences, Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Biology and Toxicology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil
| | - Katiussia Pinho da Silva
- Department of Biophysics and Pharmacology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Biosciences, Botucatu, Brazil
| | - Cibele Dos Santos Borges
- Department of Structural and Functional Biology, Institute of Biosciences, Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Biology and Toxicology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil
| | - André Mueller
- Department of Biophysics and Pharmacology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Biosciences, Botucatu, Brazil
| | - Lethícia Valencise
- Department of Structural and Functional Biology, Institute of Biosciences, Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Biology and Toxicology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil
| | - André Sampaio Pupo
- Department of Biophysics and Pharmacology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Biosciences, Botucatu, Brazil
| | - Wilma De Grava Kempinas
- Department of Structural and Functional Biology, Institute of Biosciences, Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Biology and Toxicology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|