Further definition of the sequence and position requirements of the arginine control element that mediates repression and induction by arginine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Candida albicans induces arginine biosynthetic genes in response to host-derived reactive oxygen species

The interaction of Candida albicans with phagocytes of the host's innate immune system is highly dynamic, and its outcome directly impacts the progression of infection. While the switch to hyphal growth within the macrophage is the most obvious physiological response, much of the genetic response reflects nutrient starvation: translational repression and induction of alternative carbon metabolism. Changes in amino acid metabolism are not seen, with the striking exception of arginine biosynthesis, which is upregulated in its entirety during coculture with macrophages. Using single-cell reporters, we showed here that arginine biosynthetic genes are induced specifically in phagocytosed cells. This induction is lower in magnitude than during arginine starvation in vitro and is driven not by an arginine deficiency within the phagocyte but instead by exposure to reactive oxygen species (ROS). Curiously, these genes are induced in a narrow window of sublethal ROS concentrations. C. albicans cells phagocytosed by primary macrophages deficient in the gp91(phox) subunit of the phagocyte oxidase do not express the ARG pathway, indicating that the induction is dependent on the phagocyte oxidative burst. C. albicans arg pathway mutants are retarded in germ tube and hypha formation within macrophages but are not notably more sensitive to ROS. We also find that the ARG pathway is regulated not by the general amino acid control response but by transcriptional regulators similar to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ArgR complex. In summary, phagocytosis induces this single amino acid biosynthetic pathway in an ROS-dependent manner.

Paf1 restricts Gcn4 occupancy and antisense transcription at the ARG1 promoter

The conserved Paf1 complex negatively regulates the expression of numerous genes, yet the mechanisms by which it represses gene expression are not well understood. In this study, we use the ARG1 gene as a model to investigate the repressive functions of the Paf1 complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Our results indicate that Paf1 mediates repression of the ARG1 gene independently of the gene-specific repressor, ArgR/Mcm1. Rather, by promoting histone H2B lysine 123 ubiquitylation, Paf1 represses the ARG1 gene by negatively affecting Gcn4 occupancy at the promoter. Consistent with this observation, Gcn5 and its acetylation sites on histone H3 are required for full ARG1 derepression in paf1Δ cells, and the repressive effect of Paf1 is largely maintained when the ARG1 promoter directs transcription of a heterologous coding region. Derepression of the ARG1 gene in paf1Δ cells is accompanied by small changes in nucleosome occupancy, although these changes are subtle in comparison to those that accompany gene activation through amino acid starvation. Additionally, conditions that stimulate ARG1 transcription, including PAF1 deletion, lead to increased antisense transcription across the ARG1 promoter. This promoter-associated antisense transcription positively correlates with ARG1 sense transcription. Finally, our results indicate that Paf1 represses other genes through mechanisms similar to those used at the ARG1 gene.

Promoter regulation by distinct mechanisms of functional interplay between lysine acetylase Rtt109 and histone chaperone Asf1

The promoter activity of yeast genes can depend on lysine 56 (K56) acetylation of histone H3. This modification of H3 is performed by lysine acetylase Rtt109 acting in concert with histone chaperone Asf1. We have examined the contributions of Rtt109, Asf1, and H3 K56 acetylation to nutrient regulation of a well-studied metabolic gene, ARG1. As expected, Rtt109, Asf1, and H3 K56 acetylation are required for maximal transcription of ARG1 under inducing conditions. However, Rtt109 and Asf1 also inhibit ARG1 under repressing conditions. This inhibition requires Asf1 binding to H3-H4 and Rtt109 KAT activity, but not tail acetylation of H3-H4 or K56 acetylation of H3. These observations suggest the existence of a unique mechanism of transcriptional regulation by Rtt109. Indeed, chromatin immunoprecipitation and genetic interaction studies support a model in which promoter-targeted Rtt109 represses ARG1 by silencing a pathway of transcriptional activation that depends on ASF1. Collectively, our results show that ARG1 transcription intensity at its induced and repressed set points is controlled by different mechanisms of functional interplay between Rtt109 and Asf1.

The Paf1 complex represses ARG1 transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by promoting histone modifications

The conserved multifunctional Paf1 complex is important for the proper transcription of numerous genes, and yet the exact mechanisms by which it controls gene expression remain unclear. While previous studies indicate that the Paf1 complex is a positive regulator of transcription, the repression of many genes also requires the Paf1 complex. In this study we used ARG1 as a model gene to study transcriptional repression by the Paf1 complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that several members of the Paf1 complex contribute to ARG1 repression and that the complex localizes to the ARG1 promoter and coding region in repressing conditions, which is consistent with a direct repressive function. Furthermore, Paf1 complex-dependent histone modifications are enriched at the ARG1 locus in repressing conditions, and histone H3 lysine 4 methylation contributes to ARG1 repression. Consistent with previous reports, histone H2B monoubiquitylation, the mark upstream of histone H3 lysine 4 methylation, is also important for ARG1 repression. To begin to identify the mechanistic basis for Paf1 complex-mediated repression of ARG1, we focused on the Rtf1 subunit of the complex. Through an analysis of RTF1 mutations that abrogate known Rtf1 activities, we found that Rtf1 mediates ARG1 repression primarily by facilitating histone modifications. Other members of the Paf1 complex, such as Paf1, appear to repress ARG1 through additional mechanisms. Together, our results suggest that Rtf1-dependent histone H2B ubiquitylation and H3 K4 methylation repress ARG1 expression and that histone modifications normally associated with active transcription can occur at repressed loci and contribute to transcriptional repression.

Combined chemical and genetic approach to inhibit proteolysis by the proteasome

Regulated protein destruction by the proteasome is crucial for the maintenance of normal cellular homeostasis. Much of our understanding of proteasome function stems from the use of drugs that inhibit its activity. Curiously, despite the importance of proteasomal proteolysis, previous studies have found that proliferation of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is relatively resistant to the effects of proteasome inhibitors such as MG132, even in the presence of mutations that increase inhibitor levels in cells. We reasoned that part of the resistance of S. cerevisiae to proteasome inhibitors stems from the fact that most proteasome inhibitors preferentially target the chymotryptic activity of the proteasome, and that the caspase-like and tryptic sites within the 20S core could compensate for proteasome function under these conditions. To test this hypothesis, we generated a strain of yeast in which the gene encoding the drug efflux pump Pdr5 is deleted, and the tryptic and caspase-like proteasome activities are inactivated by mutation. We find that this strain has dramatically increased sensitivity to the proteasome inhibitor MG132. Under these conditions, treatment of yeast with MG132 blocks progression through the cell cycle, increases the accumulation of polyubiquitylated proteins and decreases the ability to induce transcription of certain genes. These results highlight the contribution of the caspase-like and tryptic activities of the proteasome to its function, and provide a strategy to potently block proteasomal proteolysis in yeast that has practical applications.

Mcm1p binding sites in the ARG1 promoter positively regulate ARG1 transcription and S. cerevisiae growth in the absence of arginine and Gcn4p

In this study, we investigated the activating role of Mcm1p at ARG1 during arginine starvation. Our results showed that two Mcm1p binding sites positively contribute to ARG1 transcription and cell growth. Especially, we provide strong evidence that the Mcm1p binding sites play a positive role in ARG1 transcription to overcome arginine starvation in the absence of Gcn4p. In addition, we found that the Mcm1p binding sites are not only regulated by the presence or absence of arginine but also in the presence or absence of other amino acids. These findings suggest that the ARG1 promoter utilizes different DNA elements to control transcription, depending on which amino acids are detected in the medium.

The yeast RNA polymerase II-associated factor Iwr1p is involved in the basal and regulated transcription of specific genes

RNA polymerase II (RNA pol II) is a multisubunit enzyme that requires many auxiliary factors for its activity. Over the years, these factors have been identified using both biochemical and genetic approaches. Recently, the systematic characterization of protein complexes by tandem affinity purification and mass spectroscopy has allowed the identification of new components of well established complexes, including the RNA pol II holoenzyme. Using this approach, a novel and highly conserved factor, Iwr1p, that physically interacts with most of the RNA pol II subunits has been described in yeast. Here we show that Iwr1p genetically interacts with components of the basal transcription machinery and plays a role in both basal and regulated transcription. We report that mutation of the IWR1 gene is able to bypass the otherwise essential requirement for the transcriptional regulator negative cofactor 2, which occurs with different components of the basal transcription machinery, including TFIIA and subunits of the mediator complex. Deletion of the IWR1 gene leads to an altered expression of specific genes, including phosphate-responsive genes and SUC2. Our results show that Iwr1p is a nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein and suggest that Iwr1p acts early in the formation of the pre-initiation complex by mediating the interaction of certain activators with the basal transcription apparatus.

Mcm1p binding sites in ARG1 positively regulate Gcn4p binding and SWI/SNF recruitment

Transcription of the arginine biosynthetic gene ARG1 is activated by Gcn4p, a transcription factor induced by starvation for any amino acid. Previously, we showed that Gcn4p binding stimulates the recruitment of Mcm1p and co-activator SWI/SNF to ARG1 in cells via Gcn4p induction through amino acid starvation. Here, we report that Gcn4p binding is reduced by point mutations of the Mcm1p binding site and increased by overexpression of Mcm1p. This result suggests that Mcm1p plays a positive role in recruiting activator Gcn4p to ARG1, similar to the previously described cooperative interaction of Mcm1p with sequence-specific transcription factors at their promoters. In addition, the mutational analysis of Mcm1p binding sites showed that recruitment of the co-activator SWI/SNF correlated more closely with binding of Mcm1p than of Gcn4p at ARG1. Consistent with this, SWI/SNF co-immunoprecipitated with Mcm1p, but not with Gcn4p. These results support that Mcm1p increases the SWI/SNF recruitment at ARG1, a Gcn4p target promoter. The interaction between Mcm1p and SWI/SNF was abolished in a snf2 deletion strain containing an intact SWI/SNF sub-complex, suggesting that Mcm1p targets the catalytic subunit, which has ATPase activity, during SWI/SNF recruitment. We propose that Mcm1p contributes to active transcription at the ARG1 promoter by increasing the binding of the activator Gcn4p and by recruiting the co-activator complex SWI/SNF at ARG1 under Gcn4p-induced conditions.

Identification of InuR, a new Zn(II)2Cys6 transcriptional activator involved in the regulation of inulinolytic genes in Aspergillus niger

The expression of inulinolytic genes in Aspergillus niger is co-regulated and induced by inulin and sucrose. We have identified a positive acting transcription factor InuR, which is required for the induced expression of inulinolytic genes. InuR is a member of the fungal specific class of transcription factors of the Zn(II)2Cys6 type. Involvement of InuR in inulin and sucrose metabolism was suspected because of the clustering of inuR gene with sucB, which encodes an intracellular invertase with transfructosylation activity and a putative sugar transporter encoding gene (An15g00310). Deletion of the inuR gene resulted in a strain displaying a severe reduction in growth on inulin and sucrose medium. Northern analysis revealed that expression of inulinolytic and sucrolytic genes, e.g., inuE, inuA, sucA, as well as the putative sugar transporter gene (An15g00310) is dependent on InuR. Genome-wide expression analysis revealed, three additional putative sugar transporters encoding genes (An15g04060, An15g03940 and An17g01710), which were strongly induced by sucrose in an InuR dependent way. In silico analysis of the promoter sequences of strongly InuR regulated genes suggests that InuR might bind as dimer to two CGG triplets, which are separated by eight nucleotides.

Evolutionary changes in the fungal carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase small subunit gene and its associated upstream open reading frame

The Neurospora crassa arg-2 and the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ortholog CPA1 encode the arginine-specific carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase (CPS-A) small subunit. Arginine decreases synthesis of this subunit through the action of a 5' upstream open reading frame in the mRNA that encodes a cis-regulatory element, the arginine attenuator peptide (AAP), which stalls ribosomes in response to arginine. We performed a comparative analysis of the genomic structure and predicted peptide sequence of the AAP and CPS-A small subunit across many fungi. Differences at the genomic level included variation in intron number and position within the AAP and CPS-A coding regions and differences in known regulatory motifs. Although differences exist in AAP sequence, there were three absolutely conserved amino acid residues in the predicted peptide, including an aspartic acid crucial for arginine-dependent regulation of arg-2 and CPA1. A diverged Basidiomycete AAP was shown to retain function as an Arg-specific negative regulator of translation.

Mapping of transcription start sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using 5' SAGE

A minimally addressed area in Saccharomyces cerevisiae research is the mapping of transcription start sites (TSS). Mapping of TSS in S.cerevisiae has the potential to contribute to our understanding of gene regulation, transcription, mRNA stability and aspects of RNA biology. Here, we use 5' SAGE to map 5' TSS in S.cerevisiae. Tags identifying the first 15-17 bases of the transcripts are created, ligated to form ditags, amplified, concatemerized and ligated into a vector to create a library. Each clone sequenced from this library identifies 10-20 TSS. We have identified 13,746 unique, unambiguous sequence tags from 2231 S.cerevisiae genes. TSS identified in this study are consistent with published results, with primer extension results described here, and are consistent with expectations based on previous work on transcription initiation. We have aligned the sequence flanking 4637 TSS to identify the consensus sequence A(A(rich))5NPyA(A/T)NN(A(rich))6, which confirms and expands the previous reported PyA(A/T)Pu consensus pattern. The TSS data allowed the identification of a previously unrecognized gene, uncovered errors in previous annotation, and identified potential regulatory RNAs and upstream open reading frames in 5'-untranslated region.

A triad of subunits from the Gal11/tail domain of Srb mediator is an in vivo target of transcriptional activator Gcn4p

The Srb mediator is an important transcriptional coactivator for Gcn4p in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that three subunits of the Gal11/tail domain of mediator, Gal11p, Pgd1p, and Med2p, and the head domain subunit Srb2p make overlapping contributions to the interaction of mediator with recombinant Gcn4p in vitro. Each of these proteins, along with the tail subunit Sin4p, also contributes to the recruitment of mediator by Gcn4p to target promoters in vivo. We found that Gal11p, Med2p, and Pgd1p reside in a stable subcomplex in sin4Delta cells that interacts with Gcn4p in vitro and that is recruited independently of the rest of mediator by Gcn4p in vivo. Thus, the Gal11p/Med2p/Pgd1p triad is both necessary for recruitment of intact mediator and appears to be sufficient for recruitment by Gcn4p as a free subcomplex. The med2Delta mutation impairs the recruitment of TATA binding protein (TBP) and RNA polymerase II to the promoter and the induction of transcription at ARG1, demonstrating the importance of the tail domain for activation by Gcn4p in vivo. Even though the Gal11p/Med2p/Pgd1p triad is the only portion of Srb mediator recruited efficiently to the promoter in the sin4Delta strain, this mutant shows high-level TBP recruitment and wild-type transcriptional induction at ARG1. Hence, the Gal11p/Med2p/Pgd1p triad may contribute to TBP recruitment independently of the rest of mediator.

Recruitment of the ArgR/Mcm1p repressor is stimulated by the activator Gcn4p: a self-checking activation mechanism

Transcription of the arginine biosynthetic gene ARG1 is repressed by the ArgR/Mcm1p complex in arginine-replete cells and activated by Gcn4p, a transcription factor induced by starvation for any amino acid. We show that all four subunits of the arginine repressor are recruited to ARG1 by Gcn4p in cells replete with arginine but starved for isoleucine/valine. None of these proteins is recruited to the Gcn4p target genes ARG4 and SNZ1, which are not regulated by ArgR/Mcm1p. Mcm1p and Arg80p were found in a soluble complex lacking Arg81p and Arg82p, and both Mcm1p and Arg80p were efficiently recruited to ARG1 in wild-type cells in the presence or absence of exogenous arginine, and also in arg81Delta cells. By contrast, the recruitment of Arg81p and Arg82p was stimulated by exogenous arginine. These findings suggest that Gcn4p constitutively recruits an Mcm1p/Arg80p heterodimer and that efficient assembly of a functional repressor also containing Arg81p and Arg82p occurs only in arginine excess. By recruiting an arginine-regulated repressor, Gcn4p can precisely modulate its activation function at ARG1 according to the availability of arginine.

Transcription factor binding element detection using functional clustering of mutant expression data

As a powerful tool to reveal gene functions, gene mutation has been used extensively in molecular biology studies. With high throughput technologies, such as DNA microarray, genome-wide gene expression changes can be monitored in mutants. Here we present a simple approach to detect the transcription-factor-binding motif using microarray expression data from a mutant in which the relevant transcription factor is deleted. A core part of our approach is clustering of differentially expressed genes based on functional annotations, such as Gene Ontology (GO). We tested our method with eight microarray data sets from the Rosetta Compendium and were able to detect canonical binding motifs for at least four transcription factors. With the support of chromatin IP chip data, we also predict a possible variant of the Swi4 binding motif and recover a core motif for Arg80. Our approach should be readily applicable to microarray experiments using other types of molecular biology techniques, such as conditional knockout/overexpression or RNAi-mediated 'knockdown', to perturb the expression of a transcription factor. Functional clustering included in our approach may also provide new insights into the function of the relevant transcription factor.

Components of the SAGA histone acetyltransferase complex are required for repressed transcription of ARG1 in rich medium

Transcriptional regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ARG1 gene is controlled by positive and negative elements. The transactivator Gcn4p is required for activation in minimal medium, while arginine repression requires the ArgR/Mcm1 regulatory complex, which binds to two upstream arginine control elements. We have found that the coordinated regulation of ARG1 requires components of the SAGA chromatin-remodeling complex. Using gcn5 deletion strains and a Gcn5 protein carrying the E173Q mutation in the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) region, we show that the HAT activity of Gcn5p is required for repression of ARG1 in rich medium. Similar increases in expression were seen upon deletion of other SAGA components but not upon deletion of the ADA-specific component, Ahc1p. Chromatin immunoprecipitations using antibodies to acetylated H3 confirmed that a decrease in the level of acetylated histones at the ARG1 promoter correlated with increased ARG1 expression. Up-regulation of ARG1 in the absence of Gcn5p also correlated with increased binding of TATA-binding protein to the promoter. The analysis of promoter deletions showed that Gcn5/Ada repression of ARG1 was mediated through the action of the ArgR/Mcm1 regulatory complex. In addition, studies with minimal medium demonstrated a requirement for the Ada proteins in activation of ARG1. This suggests that SAGA has a dual role at ARG1, acting to repress transcription in rich medium and activate transcription in minimal medium.

The E2 ubiquitin conjugase Rad6 is required for the ArgR/Mcm1 repression of ARG1 transcription

Transcription of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ARG1 gene is under the control of both positive and negative elements. Activation of the gene in minimal medium is induced by Gcn4. Repression occurs in the presence of arginine and requires the ArgR/Mcm1 complex that binds to two upstream arginine control (ARC) elements. With the recent finding that the E2 ubiquitin conjugase Rad6 modifies histone H2B, we examined the role of Rad6 in the regulation of ARG1 transcription. We find that Rad6 is required for repression of ARG1 in rich medium, with expression increased approximately 10-fold in a rad6 null background. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis indicates increased binding of TATA-binding protein in the absence of Rad6. The active-site cysteine of Rad6 is required for repression, implicating ubiquitination in the process. The effects of Rad6 at ARG1 involve two components. In one of these, histone H2B is the likely target for ubiquitination by Rad6, since a strain expressing histone H2B with the principal ubiquitination site converted from lysine to arginine shows a fivefold relief of repression. The second component requires Ubr1 and thus likely the pathway of N-end rule degradation. Through the analysis of promoter constructs with ARC deleted and an arg80 rad6 double mutant, we show that Rad6 repression is mediated through the ArgR/Mcm1 complex. In addition, analysis of an ada2 rad6 deletion strain indicated that the SAGA acetyltransferase complex and Rad6 act in the same pathway to repress ARG1 in rich medium.

Synergistic operation of the CAR2 (Ornithine transaminase) promoter elements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Dal82p binds to the UIS(ALL) sites of allophanate-induced genes of the allantoin-degradative pathway and functions synergistically with the GATA family Gln3p and Gat1p transcriptional activators that are responsible for nitrogen catabolite repression-sensitive gene expression. CAR2, which encodes the arginine-degradative enzyme ornithine transaminase, is not nitrogen catabolite repression sensitive, but its expression can be modestly induced by the allantoin pathway inducer. The dominant activators of CAR2 transcription have been thought to be the ArgR and Mcm1 factors, which mediate arginine-dependent induction. These observations prompted us to investigate the structure of the CAR2 promoter with the objectives of determining whether other transcription factors were required for CAR2 expression and, if so, of ascertaining their relative contributions to CAR2's expression and control. We show that Rap1p binds upstream of CAR2 and plays a central role in its induced expression irrespective of whether the inducer is arginine or the allantoin pathway inducer analogue oxalurate (OXLU). Our data also explain the early report that ornithine transaminase production is induced when cells are grown with urea. OXLU induction derives from the Dal82p binding site, which is immediately downstream of the Rap1p site, and Dal82p functions synergistically with Rap1p. This synergism is unlike all other known instances of Dal82p synergism, namely, that with the GATA family transcription activators Gln3p and Gat1p, which occurs only in the presence of an inducer. The observations reported suggest that CAR2 gene expression results from strong constitutive transcriptional activation mediated by Rap1p and Dal82p being balanced by the down regulation of an equally strong transcriptional repressor, Ume6p. This balance is then tipped in the direction of expression by the presence of the inducer. The formal structure of the CAR2 promoter and its operation closely follow the model proposed for CAR1.

Combinatorial regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae CAR1 (arginase) promoter in response to multiple environmental signals

CAR1 (arginase) gene expression responds to multiple environmental signals; expression is induced in response to the intracellular accumulation of arginine and repressed when readily transported and catabolized nitrogen sources are available in the environment. Up to 14 cis-acting sites and 9 trans-acting factors have been implicated in regulated CAR1 transcription. In all but one case, the sites are redundant. To test whether these sites actually participate in CAR1 expression, each class of sites was inactivated by substitution mutations that retained the native spacing of the CAR1 cis-acting elements. Three types of sites function independently of the nitrogen source: two clusters of Abflp- and Rap1p-binding sites, and a GC-rich sequence. Two different sets of nitrogen source-dependent sites are also required: the first consists of two GATAA-containing UASNTR sites that mediate nitrogen catabolite repression-sensitive transcription, and the second is arginine dependent and consists of three UAS1 elements that activate transcription only when arginine is present. A single URS1 site mediates repression of CAR1 arginine-independent upstream activator site (UAS) activity in the absence of arginine and the presence of a poor nitrogen source (a condition under which the inducer-independent Gln3p can function in association with the UASNTR sites). When arginine is present, the combined activity of the UAS elements overcomes the negative effects mediated by URS1. Mutation of the classes of sites either singly or in combination markedly alters CAR1 promoter operation and control, supporting the idea that they function synergistically to regulate expression of the gene.

Ribosome regulation by the nascent peptide

Studies of bacterial and eukaryotic systems have identified two-gene operons in which the translation product of the upstream gene influences translation of the downstream gene. The upstream gene, referred to as a leader (gene) in bacterial systems or an upstream open reading frame (uORF) in eukaryotes, encodes a peptide that interferes with a function(s) of its translating ribosome. The peptides are therefore cis-acting negative regulators of translation. The inhibitory peptides typically consist of fewer than 25 residues and function prior to emergence from the ribosome. A biological role for this class of translation inhibitor is demonstrated in translation attenuation, a form or regulation that controls the inducible translation of the chloramphenicol resistance genes cat and cmlA in bacteria. Induction of cat or cmlA requires ribosome stalling at a particular codon in the leader region of the mRNA. Stalling destabilizes an adjacent, downstream mRNA secondary structure that normally sequesters the ribosome-binding site for the cat or cmlA coding regions. Genetic studies indicate that the nascent, leader-encoded peptide is the selector of the site of ribosome stalling in leader mRNA by cis interference with translation. Synthetic leader peptides inhibit ribosomal peptidyltransferase in vitro, leading to the prediction that this activity is the basis for stall site selection. Recent studies have shown that the leader peptides are rRNA-binding peptides with targets at the peptidyl transferase center of 23S rRNA. uORFs associated with several eukaryotic genes inhibit downstream translation. When inhibition depends on the specific codon sequence of the uORF, it has been proposed that the uORF-encoded nascent peptide prevents ribosome release from the mRNA at the uORF stop codon. This sets up a blockade to ribosome scanning which minimizes downstream translation. Segments within large proteins also appear to regulate ribosome activity in cis, although in most of the known examples the active amino acid sequences function after their emergence from the ribosome, cis control of translation by the nascent peptide is gene specific; nearly all such regulatory peptides exert no obvious trans effects in cells. The in vitro biochemical activities of the cat/cmla leader peptides on ribosomes and rRNA suggest a mechanism through which the nascent peptide can modify ribosome behavior. Other cis-acting regulatory peptides may involve more complex ribosomal interactions.

Role of an upstream open reading frame in mediating arginine-specific translational control in Neurospora crassa

The Neurospora crassa arg-2 transcript contains an upstream open reading frame (uORF) specifying a 24-residue leader peptide and is subject to a novel form of negative translational regulation in response to arginine. The role of the arg-2 uORF in arginine-specific negative regulation was investigated by using translational fusions of wild-type and mutant arg-2 sequences to the Escherichia coli lacZ reporter gene specifying beta-galactosidase. The wild-type uORF conferred Arg-specific regulation on the reporter gene in N. crassa, but mutated or truncated uORFs did not, as determined by measurements of beta-galactosidase activity produced in N. crassa strains expressing arg-2-lacZ fusion genes. All effects on reporter gene expression were posttranscriptional, as determined by measurement of RNA levels. Both sequence-dependent and sequence-independent effects of uORFs were observed. Genes containing the wild-type uORF or a 21-codon mutated uORF showed reduced translation in comparison with that of a gene lacking a uORF. Both uORF-containing transcripts showed reduced association with polysomes relative to transcripts lacking a uORF, but only the transcript with the wild-type uORF showed a reduced average number of ribosomes associated with it in response to arginine addition. Direct translational fusions between uORF sequences and lacZ sequences indicated that the uORF is translated. Overlapping the uORF with the lacZ initiation codon indicated that ribosome reinitiation at a downstream start codon is not integral to uORF-mediated, Arg-specific translational regulation. These studies provide direct biochemical evidence for arg-2 uORF function in translational control.