Intraoperative duplex scanning reduces the incidence of residual stenosis after carotid endarterectomy

Intraoperative completion studies in carotid endarterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of techniques and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Declining perioperative stroke and death rates over the past 3 decades have been paralleled by an increasing use of intraoperative completion studies (ICS) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Techniques applied include angiography, intraoperative duplex ultrasound (IDUS), flowmetry, and angioscopy. This systematic review and meta-analysis is aiming on providing an overview of techniques and corresponding outcomes.

METHODS

A PubMed based systematic literature review comprising the years 1980 through 2020 was performed using predefined keywords to identify articles on different ICS techniques. Pooled analyses and meta-analyses estimating risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed to compare outcomes of different ICS modes to nonapplication of any ICS. I2 values were assessed to quantify study heterogeneities.

RESULTS

Identification of 34 studies including patients undergoing CEA with angiography (n=53,218), IDUS (n=20,030), flowmetry (n=16,812), and angioscopy (n=2,291). Corresponding rates of perioperative stroke were 1.5%, 1.8%, 3.6%, and 1.5%, perioperative stroke or death occurred in 1.7%, 1.9%, 2.2%, and 2.0%. Intraoperative surgical revision rates were 6.2%, 5.9%, and 7.9% after CEA with angiography, IDUS, and angioscopy, respectively. Compared to nonapplication of any ICS, the pooled analysis revealed angiography to be significantly associated with lower rates of stroke (RR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.36-0.62; P<0.0001) and stroke or death (RR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70-0.83; P<0.0001). IDUS was significantly associated with lower rates of stroke (RR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43-0.73; P<0.0001) and stroke or death (RR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.93; P=0.0018), whereas angioscopy showed a significant association with a lower stroke rate (RR 0.48; 95% CI, 0.033-0.68; P=0.0001), but no effect on the combined stroke or death rate. Angioscopy was associated with a higher intraoperative revision rate compared to angiography (RR 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07-1.54; P=0.006). The meta-analyses confirmed lower perioperative stroke or death rates for angiography (RR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91) and IDUS (RR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.98) compared to non-application of any ICS, whereas flowmetry showed no significant association.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the first systematic literature review and meta-analysis on usage of ICSs in CEA. Data strongly indicate a significant beneficial effect of angiography, IDUS, and angioscopy on perioperative CEA outcomes. Any carotid surgeon should consider implementation of ICSs in his routine armamentarium.

[Intraoperative angiography in carotid artery reconstruction-Pathological findings, reliability and importance of the procedure]

Ziel

Der Wert der intraoperativen Angiographie und deren Ad-hoc-Beurteilung im Hinblick auf operationstechnische Unzulänglichkeiten soll geprüft werden.

Methode

Insgesamt 523 konsekutive A.-cartotis-Thrombendarteriektomie(TEA)-Patienten mit intraoperativer Kontrollangiographie, postoperativer Duplexsonographie und retrospektiver Zweitbeurteilung der Angiographie wurden in die Auswertung einbezogen.

Ergebnisse

In der retrospektiven Zweitbeurteilung der Angiographie wurden 23 (4,4%) Verschlüsse oder hochgradige Stenosen der Arteria carotis communis (ACC) oder Arteria carotis interna (ACI) im Operationsbereich (12/2,3%) bzw. in der Abstrombahn (distale extrakranielle und intrakranielle ACI, A. cerebri media [ACM]) detektiert (11/2,1%), wohingegen bei der intraoperativen Ad-hoc-Beurteilung nur 13 (2,5%) derartige Pathologien beschrieben worden waren (7/1,3% im Operationsbereich, 6/1,1% in der Abstrombahn; p=0,002). Duplexsonographisch wurden postoperativ bei 50 von 505 untersuchten Patienten (10,1%) operationstechnische Unzulänglichkeiten lokal detektiert, was signifikant mehr war als in der Angiographie (p<0,001). In den meisten Fällen handelte es sich um nicht okkludierende/nicht hochgradig stenosierende Intima-Media-Ablösungen (19), Nahteinziehungen (13) und Kinkings/Kalibersprünge am distalen Patchende (14). Nahteinziehungen und Kinkings/Kalibersprünge waren mit einer linksseitigen TEA (adjustierte OR: 2,4; 95%-KI: 1,1‑5,1), einer Operation ohne Patch (adjustierte OR: 16,6; 95%-KI: 1,3–215,0) und der Verwendung eines Dacron- vs. Polytetrafluorethylen-Patch (adjustierte OR: 3,0; 95%-KI: 1,4–6,6) assoziiert.

Schlussfolgerung

Bei der Ad-hoc-Beurteilung der intraoperativen Kontrollangiographie kann eine nicht unerhebliche Zahl auch okkludierender und hochgradig stenosierender Pathologien übersehen werden (zur Detektion nicht okkludierender und nicht hochgradig stenosierender operativer Unzulänglichkeiten methodisch nicht geeignet – Ausweich: postoperative Duplexsonographie).

Role of Residual Defects Following Carotid Endarterectomy in the Occurrence of Cerebrovascular Symptoms

Carotid endarterectomy deals successfully with carotid atheromatous lesions, thus eliminating a potential source of cerebral emboli. At times, however, residual hemodynamic irregularities may occur as a result of technique imperfection or anatomic variations. These irregularities have been associated with a number of immediate and late postoperative complications, such as recurrent cerebrovascular symptoms and secondary episodes of stroke. For this reason, the detection of flow abnormalities or intimal defects in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy and the achievement of normal intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics are essential for the elimination of potentially life-threatening perioperative and late cerebrovascular events.

Completion imaging after carotid endarterectomy in the Vascular Study Group of New England

OBJECTIVES

We studied surgeons' practice patterns in the use of completion imaging (duplex or arteriography), and their association with 30-day stroke/death and 1-year restenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

METHODS

Using a retrospective analysis of 6115 CEAs, we categorized surgeons based on use of completion imaging as rarely (<5% of CEAs), selective (5% to 90%), or routine (≥90%). Crude and risk-adjusted 30-day stroke/death and 1-year restenosis rates were examined across surgeon practice patterns. Finally, we audited 90 operative reports of patients who underwent re-exploration and characterized findings and interventions. We analyzed the effect of re-exploration on outcomes.

RESULTS

Practice patterns in completion imaging varied: 51% of surgeons performed completion imaging rarely, 22% selectively, and 27% routinely. Crude 30-day stroke/death rates were highest among surgeons who routinely used completion imaging (rarely: 1.7%; selectively: 1.2%, routinely: 2.4%; P = .05). However, after adjusting for patient characteristics predictive of stroke/death, the effect of surgeon practice pattern was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR] for routine-use surgeons, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.93-2.17; P = .10; selective-use surgeons, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.40-1.41; P = .366). Stenosis >70% at 1 year showed a trend toward lowest rates for surgeons who performed completion imaging (rarely: 2.8%, selectively: 1.1%, and routinely: 1.1%; P = .09). This effect became statistically significant for selective-use surgeons after adjustment (hazard risk [HR] for selective-use surgeons, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29-0.92; P = .02). Overall, 178 patients (2.9%) underwent operative re-exploration. Routine-use surgeons were most likely to perform re-exploration (7.6% routine, 0.8% selective, 0.9% rare; P < .001). An audit of 90 re-explored patients demonstrated technical problems, the most common being flap, debris, and plaque. Rates of stroke/death were higher among patients who underwent re-exploration (3.9% vs 1.7%; P = .03); however, this affect was attenuated after adjustment (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.9-5.0; P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of completion imaging during CEA varies widely across our region. There is little evidence that surgeons who use completion imaging have lower rates of 30-day stroke/death, although selective use of completion imaging is associated with a small but a significant reduction in stenosis 1 year after surgery. We also demonstrate an association between re-exploration and higher risk of 30-day stroke/death, although this effect was attenuated after adjustment for patient-level predictors of stroke/death. Future work is needed to direct the selective use of completion imaging to prevent stroke, rather than cause unnecessary re-exploration.

Cost-effectiveness of Intraoperative Imaging in Carotid Endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE:

There has never been a large, randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of intraoperative imaging on the success of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This comparison involves cost-effectiveness analysis.

METHODS:

We constructed a decision-analytic model to compare effectiveness and costs of intraoperative ultrasound (IUS) and completion angiography as adjuncts to CEA. Data on procedural mortality, morbidity, and costs were obtained from the English-language literature. The review included a total of 52 reports, encompassing more than 22,000 patients. The main components of costs were those of the monitoring interventions and the care of perioperative stroke.

RESULTS:

Mean perioperative outcome without completion imaging is approximately 96.7% of what it would be in the absence of perioperative stroke or death. IUS and completion angiography each result in approximately 2% improvement in expected outcome. Mean perioperative costs are $396.50 for IUS, $721.30 for no monitoring, and $840.90 for completion angiography. Because IUS is significantly more effective at detecting technical errors that would likely result in perioperative stroke than no imaging and is significantly less costly than angiography, this strategy dominates the other two (i.e., it provides greater effectiveness at lower cost).

CONCLUSION:

Although surgical complications are uncommon, IUS substantially lowers the rate of perioperative stroke and mortality and thus is significantly more cost-effective than either completion angiography or no operative imaging.

Intraoperative duplex ultrasound of visceral revascularizations: optimizing technical success and outcome

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of intraoperative duplex ultrasound scanning (IOUS) during visceral revascularizations and correlate its results with clinical outcome.

METHODS

We studied 68 patients (15 men and 53 women, mean age 66.5 years, range 27-86 years) who underwent visceral revascularization with concomitant IOUS examination of 120 visceral arteries (52 celiac, 60 superior mesenteric, and 8 inferior mesenteric arteries) from 1992 to 2002. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of ultrasound findings: normal and abnormal IOUS. The incidence of early and late graft-related complications (thrombosis, restenosis, recurrent symptoms, reintervention) and graft-related death was compared in both groups.

RESULTS

One-hundred and two (85%) arteries had normal IOUS. Eight (6.6%) arteries had minor defects, including small kinks (4), mild residual stenoses (3), and small intimal flap (1). Ten (8.4%) arteries had major defects, consisting of hemodynamically significant residual stenoses (4), thrombus (2), kinks (2), bidirectional flow (1), and intimal flap (1). Major defects were successfully revised in all except three cases: two persistent mild stenoses and one bidirectional flow. Patients with abnormal IOUS at the end of the operation had increased incidence of graft-related complications and/or death (55.5% vs 7.8%; P =.004), early graft thrombosis (14.2% vs 1.0; P =.04), reintervention (21.4% vs 3.2%; P =.03), and graft-related death (33.3% vs 1.9%; P =.02), compared with patients with normal IOUS.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the routine use of IOUS during visceral revascularizations to optimize technical success and outcome. Persistent ultrasound scanning abnormalities are associated with risk of early graft failure, reintervention, and death. Patients with normal ultrasound scans can expect excellent results.

Reoperation for carotid stenosis is as safe as primary carotid endarterectomy

PURPOSE

Patients with recurrent carotid artery stenosis are sometimes referred for carotid angioplasty and stenting because of reports that carotid reoperation has a higher complication rate than primary carotid endarterectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a difference exists between outcomes of primary carotid endarterectomy and reoperative carotid surgery.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed for all carotid operations performed from September 1993 through March 1998 by vascular surgery faculty at a single academic center. The results of primary carotid endarterectomy and operation for recurrent carotid stenosis were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 390 operations were performed on 352 patients. Indications for primary carotid endarterectomy (n = 350) were asymptomatic high-grade stenosis in 42% of the cases, amaurosis fugax and transient ischemic symptoms in 35%, global symptoms in 14%, and previous stroke in 9%. Indications for reoperative carotid surgery (n = 40) were symptomatic recurrent lesions in 50% of the cases and progressive high-grade asymptomatic stenoses in 50%. The results of primary carotid endarterectomy were no postoperative deaths, an overall stroke rate of 1.1% (three postoperative strokes, one preoperative stroke after angiography), and no permanent cranial nerve deficits. The results of operations for recurrent carotid stenosis were no postoperative deaths, no postoperative strokes, and no permanent cranial nerve deficits. In the primary carotid endarterectomy group, the mean hospital length of stay was 2.6 +/- 1. 1 days and the mean hospital cost was $9700. In the reoperative group, the mean length of stay was 2.6 +/- 1.5 days and the mean cost was $13,700. The higher cost of redo surgery is accounted for by a higher preoperative cerebral angiography rate (90%) in redo cases as compared with primary endarterectomy (40%).

CONCLUSION

In this series of 390 carotid operations, the procedure-related stroke/death rate was 0.8%. There were no differences between the stroke-death rates after primary carotid endarterectomy and operation for recurrent carotid stenosis. Operation for recurrent carotid stenosis is as safe and effective as primary carotid endarterectomy and should continue to be standard treatment.