Plasmid R1 is present as clusters in the cells of Escherichia coli

Positioning of cellular components by the ParA/MinD family of ATPases

The ParA/MinD (A/D) family of ATPases spatially organize an array of genetic- and protein-based cellular cargos across the bacterial and archaeal domains of life. By far, the two best-studied members, and family namesake, are ParA and MinD, involved in bacterial DNA segregation and divisome positioning, respectively. ParA and MinD make protein waves on the nucleoid or membrane to segregate chromosomes and position the divisome. Less studied is the growing list of A/D ATPases widespread across bacteria and implicated in the subcellular organization of diverse protein-based complexes and organelles involved in myriad biological processes, from metabolism to pathogenesis. Here we describe mechanistic commonality, variation, and coordination among the most widespread family of positioning ATPases used in the subcellular organization of disparate cargos across bacteria and archaea.

Characterization of ori and parS-like functions in secondary genome replicons in Deinococcus radiodurans

The mechanisms underlying multipartite genome maintenance and its functional significance in extraordinary radioresistance of Deinococcus radiodurans are not well understood. The sequences upstream to parAB operons in chrII (cisII) and MP (cisMP) could stabilize an otherwise, non-replicative colE1 plasmid, in D. radiodurans DnaA and cognate ParB proteins bound specifically with cisII and cisMP elements. The ΔcisII and ΔcisMP cells showed the reduced copy number of cognate replicons and radioresistance as compared with wild type. Fluorescent reporter-operator system inserted in chrI, chrII, and MP in wild type and cisII mutants showed the presence of all three replicons in wild-type cells. Although chrI was present in all the ΔcisII and ΔcisMP cells, nearly half of these cells had chrII and MP, respectively, and the other half had the reduced number of foci representing these replications. These results suggested that cisII and cisMP elements contain both origin of replication and parS-like functions and the secondary genome replicons (chrII and MP) are maintained independent of chrI and have roles in radioresistance of D. radiodurans.

Hitchhiking on chromosomes: A persistence strategy shared by diverse selfish DNA elements

An underlying theme in the segregation of low-copy bacterial plasmids is the assembly of a 'segrosome' by DNA-protein and protein-protein interactions, followed by energy-driven directed movement. Analogous partitioning mechanisms drive the segregation of host chromosomes as well. Eukaryotic extra-chromosomal elements, exemplified by budding yeast plasmids and episomes of certain mammalian viruses, harbor partitioning systems that promote their physical association with chromosomes. In doing so, they indirectly take advantage of the spindle force that directs chromosome movement to opposite cell poles. Molecular-genetic, biochemical and cell biological studies have revealed several unsuspected aspects of 'chromosome hitchhiking' by the yeast 2-micron plasmid, including the ability of plasmid sisters to associate symmetrically with sister chromatids. As a result, the plasmid overcomes the 'mother bias' experienced by plasmids lacking a partitioning system, and elevates itself to near chromosome status in equal segregation. Chromosome association for stable propagation, without direct energy expenditure, may also be utilized by a small minority of bacterial plasmids-at least one case has been reported. Given the near perfect accuracy of chromosome segregation, it is not surprising that elements residing in evolutionarily distant host organisms have converged upon the common strategy of gaining passage to daughter cells as passengers on chromosomes.

Organization of ribosomes and nucleoids in Escherichia coli cells during growth and in quiescence

We have examined the distribution of ribosomes and nucleoids in live Escherichia coli cells under conditions of growth, division, and in quiescence. In exponentially growing cells translating ribosomes are interspersed among and around the nucleoid lobes, appearing as alternative bands under a fluorescence microscope. In contrast, inactive ribosomes either in stationary phase or after treatment with translation inhibitors such as chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and streptomycin gather predominantly at the cell poles and boundaries with concomitant compaction of the nucleoid. However, under all conditions, spatial segregation of the ribosomes and the nucleoids is well maintained. In dividing cells, ribosomes accumulate on both sides of the FtsZ ring at the mid cell. However, the distribution of the ribosomes among the new daughter cells is often unequal. Both the shape of the nucleoid and the pattern of ribosome distribution are also modified when the cells are exposed to rifampicin (transcription inhibitor), nalidixic acid (gyrase inhibitor), or A22 (MreB-cytoskeleton disruptor). Thus we conclude that the intracellular organization of the ribosomes and the nucleoids in bacteria are dynamic and critically dependent on cellular growth processes (replication, transcription, and translation) as well as on the integrity of the MreB cytoskeleton.

Defining the role of ATP hydrolysis in mitotic segregation of bacterial plasmids

Hydrolysis of ATP by partition ATPases, although considered a key step in the segregation mechanism that assures stable inheritance of plasmids, is intrinsically very weak. The cognate centromere-binding protein (CBP), together with DNA, stimulates the ATPase to hydrolyse ATP and to undertake the relocation that incites plasmid movement, apparently confirming the need for hydrolysis in partition. However, ATP-binding alone changes ATPase conformation and properties, making it difficult to rigorously distinguish the substrate and cofactor roles of ATP in vivo. We had shown that mutation of arginines R36 and R42 in the F plasmid CBP, SopB, reduces stimulation of SopA-catalyzed ATP hydrolysis without changing SopA-SopB affinity, suggesting the role of hydrolysis could be analyzed using SopA with normal conformational responses to ATP. Here, we report that strongly reducing SopB-mediated stimulation of ATP hydrolysis results in only slight destabilization of mini-F, although the instability, as well as an increase in mini-F clustering, is proportional to the ATPase deficit. Unexpectedly, the reduced stimulation also increased the frequency of SopA relocation over the nucleoid. The increase was due to drastic shortening of the period spent by SopA at nucleoid ends; average speed of migration per se was unchanged. Reduced ATP hydrolysis was also associated with pronounced deviations in positioning of mini-F, though time-averaged positions changed only modestly. Thus, by specifically targeting SopB-stimulated ATP hydrolysis our study reveals that even at levels of ATPase which reduce the efficiency of splitting clusters and the constancy of plasmid positioning, SopB still activates SopA mobility and plasmid positioning, and sustains near wild type levels of plasmid stability.

Genes enabling bacteria to survive and thrive in challenging environments are very often found on small, non-essential DNA molecules called plasmids. Many plasmids are naturally present in the cell in very few copies and so risk being lost from one of the daughter cells upon division. These plasmids elaborate a partition system, functionally similar to mitosis, which assures their faithful inheritance. Chromosomes also generally possess such systems. We know that partition systems involve two proteins, that one (B) stimulates the other (A) to hydrolyse ATP, and that upon binding to A protein ATP confers properties needed for partition. ATP's double action, as hydrolysis substrate and cofactor, complicates definition of its role in the mechanism. The novelty of our approach lies in use of B protein mutants that do not stimulate hydrolysis. Our results reveal that the major function of ATP hydrolysis is not to displace plasmid molecules to their positions in each cell half, as generally thought, but to split initial sibling plasmid pairs and prevent their reforming. This study is the first to dissect ATPase activity in vivo using normal A-protein ATPase, and so opens a new avenue to exploration of the mechanisms that ensure plasmid and chromosome inheritance.

Eclipse period of R1 plasmids during downshift from elevated copy number: Nonrandom selection of copies for replication

The classical Meselson-Stahl density-shift method was used to study replication of pOU71, a runaway-replication derivative of plasmid R1 in Escherichia coli. The miniplasmid maintained the normal low copy number of R1 during steady growth at 30°C, but as growth temperatures were raised above 34°C, the copy number of the plasmid increased to higher levels, and at 42°C, it replicated without control in a runaway replication mode with lethal consequences for the host. The eclipse periods (minimum time between successive replication of the same DNA) of the plasmid shortened with rising copy numbers at increasing growth temperatures (Olsson et al., 2003). In this work, eclipse periods were measured during downshifts in copy number of pOU71 after it had replicated at 39 and 42°C, resulting in 7- and 50-fold higher than normal plasmid copy number per cell, respectively. Eclipse periods for plasmid replication, measured during copy number downshift, suggested that plasmid R1, normally selected randomly for replication, showed a bias such that a newly replicated DNA had a higher probability of replication compared to the bulk of the R1 population. However, even the unexpected nonrandom replication followed the copy number kinetics such that every generation, the plasmids underwent the normal inherited number of replication, n, independent of the actual number of plasmid copies in a newborn cell.

Evaluating quantitative methods for measuring plasmid copy numbers in single cells

The life of plasmids is a constant battle against fluctuations: failing to correct copy number fluctuations can increase the plasmid loss rate by many orders of magnitude, as can a failure to more evenly divide the copies between daughters at cell division. Plasmids are therefore long-standing model systems for stochastic processes in cells, much thanks to the efforts of Kurt Nordström to whose memory this issue is dedicated. Here we analyze a range of experimental methods for measuring plasmid copy numbers in single cells, focusing on challenges, trade-offs, and necessary experimental controls. In particular we analyze published and unpublished strategies to infer copy numbers from expression of plasmid-encoded reporters, direct labeling of plasmids with fluorescent probes or DNA binding proteins fused to fluorescent reporters, PCR based methods applied to single cell lysates, and plasmid-specific replication arrest. We conclude that no method currently exists to measure plasmid copy numbers in single cells, and that most methods are overwhelmed by various types of experimental noise. We also discuss how accurate methods can be developed.

The ParMRC system: molecular mechanisms of plasmid segregation by actin-like filaments

The ParMRC plasmid partitioning apparatus is one of the best characterized systems for bacterial DNA segregation. Bundles of actin-like filaments are used to push plasmids to opposite poles of the cell, whereupon they are stably inherited on cell division. This plasmid-encoded system comprises just three components: an actin-like protein, ParM, a DNA-binding adaptor protein, ParR, and a centromere-like region, parC. The properties and interactions of these components have been finely tuned to enable ParM filaments to search the cell space for plasmids and then move ParR-parC-bound DNA molecules apart. In this Review, we look at some of the most exciting questions in the field concerning the exact molecular mechanisms by which the components of this self-contained system modulate one another's activity to achieve bipolar DNA segregation.

Plasmid segregation: how to survive as an extra piece of DNA

Non-essential extra-chromosomal DNA elements such as plasmids are responsible for their own propagation in dividing host cells, and one means to ensure this is to carry a miniature active segregation system reminiscent of the mitotic spindle. Plasmids that are maintained at low numbers in prokaryotic cells have developed a range of such active partitioning systems, which are characterized by an impressive simplicity and efficiency and which are united by the use of dynamic, nucleotide-driven filaments to separate and position DNA molecules. A comparison of different plasmid segregation systems reveals (i) how unrelated filament-forming and DNA-binding proteins have been adopted and modified to create a range of simple DNA segregating complexes and (ii) how subtle changes in the few components of these DNA segregation machines has led to a remarkable diversity in the molecular mechanisms of closely related segregation systems. Here, our current understanding of plasmid segregation systems is reviewed and compared with other DNA segregation systems, and this is extended by a discussion of basic principles of plasmid segregation systems, evolutionary implications and the relationship between an autonomous DNA element and its host cell.

Bacterial partitioning proteins affect the subcellular location of broad-host-range plasmid RK2

It has been demonstrated that plasmids are not randomly distributed but are located symmetrically in mid-cell, or (1/4), (3/4) positions in bacterial cells. In this work we compared the localization of broad-host-range plasmid RK2 mini-replicons, which lack an active partitioning system, in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas putida cells. In E. coli the location of the plasmid mini-replicon cluster was at the cell poles. In contrast, in Pseudomonas cells, as a result of the interaction of chromosomally encoded ParB protein with RK2 centromere-like sequences, these mini-derivatives were localized in the proximity of mid-cell, or (1/4), (3/4) positions. The expression of the Pseudomonas parAB genes in E. coli resulted in a positional change in the RK2 mini-derivative to the mid-cell or (1/4), (3/4) positions. Moreover, in a P. putida parAB mutant, both RK2 mini-derivatives and the entire RK2 plasmid exhibited disturbances of subcellular localization. These observations raise the possibility that in certain bacteria chromosomally encoded partitioning machinery could affect subcellular plasmid positioning.

Bacterial actin: architecture of the ParMRC plasmid DNA partitioning complex

The R1 plasmid employs ATP-driven polymerisation of the actin-like protein ParM to move newly replicated DNA to opposite poles of a bacterial cell. This process is essential for ensuring accurate segregation of the low-copy number plasmid and is the best characterised example of DNA partitioning in prokaryotes. In vivo, ParM only forms long filaments when capped at both ends by attachment to a centromere-like region parC, through a small DNA-binding protein ParR. Here, we present biochemical and electron microscopy data leading to a model for the mechanism by which ParR-parC complexes bind and stabilise elongating ParM filaments. We propose that the open ring formed by oligomeric ParR dimers with parC DNA wrapped around acts as a rigid clamp, which holds the end of elongating ParM filaments while allowing entry of new ATP-bound monomers. We propose a processive mechanism by which cycles of ATP hydrolysis in polymerising ParM drives movement of ParR-bound parC DNA. Importantly, our model predicts that each pair of plasmids will be driven apart in the cell by just a single double helical ParM filament.

Plasmid segregation: is a total understanding within reach?

Recent in vitro and in vivo studies of the proteins responsible for the active partitioning of bacterial plasmids suggest that it will be possible to develop a quantitative, molecular understanding of this form of DNA segregation.

Structural biology of plasmid partition: uncovering the molecular mechanisms of DNA segregation

DNA segregation or partition is an essential process that ensures stable genome transmission. In prokaryotes, partition is best understood for plasmids, which serve as tractable model systems to study the mechanistic underpinnings of DNA segregation at a detailed atomic level owing to their simplicity. Specifically, plasmid partition requires only three elements: a centromere-like DNA site and two proteins: a motor protein, generally an ATPase, and a centromere-binding protein. In the first step of the partition process, multiple centromere-binding proteins bind co-operatively to the centromere, which typically consists of several tandem repeats, to form a higher-order nucleoprotein complex called the partition complex. The partition complex recruits the ATPase to form the segrosome and somehow activates the ATPase for DNA separation. Two major families of plasmid par systems have been delineated based on whether they utilize ATPase proteins with deviant Walker-type motifs or actin-like folds. In contrast, the centromere-binding proteins show little sequence homology even within a given family. Recent structural studies, however, have revealed that these centromere-binding proteins appear to belong to one of two major structural groups: those that employ helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motifs or those with ribbon-helix-helix DNA-binding domains. The first structure of a higher-order partition complex was recently revealed by the structure of pSK41 centromere-binding protein, ParR, bound to its centromere site. This structure showed that multiple ParR ribbon-helix-helix motifs bind symmetrically to the tandem centromere repeats to form a large superhelical structure with dimensions suitable for capture of the filaments formed by the actinlike ATPases. Surprisingly, recent data indicate that the deviant Walker ATPase proteins also form polymer-like structures, suggesting that, although the par families harbour what initially appeared to be structurally and functionally divergent proteins, they actually utilize similar mechanisms of DNA segregation. Thus, in the present review, the known Par protein and Par-protein complex structures are discussed with regard to their functions in DNA segregation in an attempt to begin to define, at a detailed atomic level, the molecular mechanisms involved in plasmid segregation.

New pSC101-derivative cloning vectors with elevated copy numbers

Mutations that increase the copy number of the pSC101 replicon have been used for construction of new cloning vectors. Replacement of glutamate at position 93 in RepA yields plasmids that replicate at medium (27 copies/cell) and high (approximately 240 copies/cell) copy numbers. Based on the crystal structure of RepE, a structurally similar replication initiator protein from the F factor, the pSC101 repA mutants are predicted to be defective in dimerization. The cloning vectors permit increased expression of gene products along with the advantages of pSC101-derivative plasmids, including stable maintenance and compatibility with ColE1 plasmids. The plasmids also allow blue/white screening for DNA inserts and impart resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol and kanamycin. The vectors were used in a genetic assay to suppress temperature-sensitive mutants of ffh, encoding the protein component of the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle, by overproduction of 4.5S RNA. While expression of 4.5S RNA from a wild type pSC101-derivative plasmid was not sufficient for suppression, use of the new vectors did suppress the temperature-sensitive phenotype.

In vivo visualization of type II plasmid segregation: bacterial actin filaments pushing plasmids

Type II par operons harness polymerization of the dynamically unstable actin-like protein ParM to segregate low-copy plasmids in rod-shaped bacteria. In this study, we use time-lapse fluorescence microscopy to follow plasmid dynamics and ParM assembly in Escherichia coli. Plasmids lacking a par operon undergo confined diffusion with a diffusion constant of 5 × 10⁻⁵ μm²/s and a confinement radius of 0.28 μm. Single par-containing plasmids also move diffusively but with a larger diffusion constant (4 × 10⁻⁴ μm²/s) and confinement radius (0.42 μm). ParM filaments are dynamically unstable in vivo and form spindles that link pairs of par-containing plasmids and drive them rapidly (3.1 μm/min) toward opposite poles of the cell. After reaching the poles, ParM filaments rapidly and completely depolymerize. After ParM disassembly, segregated plasmids resume diffusive motion, often encountering each other many times and undergoing multiple rounds of ParM-dependent segregation in a single cell cycle. We propose that in addition to driving segregation, the par operon enables plasmids to search space and find sister plasmids more effectively.

Plasmid partition and incompatibility ? the focus shifts

The mitotic apparatus that a plasmid uses to ensure its stable inheritance responds to the appearance of an additional copy of the plasmid's centromere by segregating it from the pre-existing copies: if the new copy arises by replication of the plasmid the result is partition, if it arrives on a different plasmid the result is incompatibility. Incompatibility thus serves as a probe of the partition mechanism. Coupling of distinct plasmids via their shared centromeres to form mixed pairs has been the favoured explanation for centromere-based incompatibility, because it supports a long-standing assumption that pairing of plasmid replicas is a prerequisite for their partition into daughter cells. Recent results from molecular genetic and fluorescence microscopy studies challenge this mixed pairing model. Partition incompatibility is seen to result from various processes, including titration, randomized positioning and a form of mixed pairing that is based on co-activation of the same partition event rather than direct contact between partition complexes. The perspectives thus opened onto the partition mechanism confirm the continuing utility of incompatibility as an approach to understanding bacterial mitosis. The results considered are compatible with the view that direct pairing of plasmids is not essential to plasmid partition.

The incC korB region of RK2 repositions a mini-RK2 replicon in Escherichia coli

Analysis by fluorescence microscopy has established that plasmid RK2 in Escherichia coli and other gram-negative bacteria is present as discrete clusters that are located inside the nucleoid at the mid- or quarter-cell positions. A mini-RK2 replicon containing an array of tetO repeats was visualized in E. coli cells that express a TetR-EYFP fusion protein. Unlike intact RK2, the RK2 mini-replicon (pCV1) was localized as a cluster at the cell poles outside of the nucleoid. Insertion of the O(B1)incC korB partitioning (par) region of RK2 into pCV1 resulted in a shift of the mini-replicon to within the nucleoid region at the mid- and quarter-cell positions. Despite the repositioning of the mini-RK2 replicon to the cellular positions where intact RK2 is normally located, the insertion of the intact O(B1) incC korB region did not significantly stabilize the mini-RK2 plasmid during cell growth. Deletions within the O(B1)incC or the korB region resulted in a failure of this par region to move pCV1 out of its polar position. The insertion of the par system of plasmid F into pCV1 resulted in a similar shift in the location of pCV1 to the nucleoid region. Unlike O(B1)incC korB, the insertion of the RK2 parABC resolvase system into pCV1 did not affect the polar positioning of pCV1. This effect of O(B1)incC korB on the location of pCV1 provides additional evidence for a partitioning role of this region of plasmid RK2. However, the failure of this region to significantly increase the stability of the mini-RK2 plasmid indicates that the localization of the plasmid to the mid- and quarter cell positions in E. coli is not in itself sufficient for the stable maintenance of plasmid RK2.

Localization of the naturally occurring plasmid ColE1 at the cell pole

The naturally occurring plasmid ColE1 was found to localize as a cluster in one or both of the cell poles of Escherichia coli. In addition to the polar localization of ColE1 in most cells, movement of the plasmid to the midcell position was observed in time-lapse studies. ColE1 could be displaced from its polar location by the p15A replicon, pBAD33, but not by plasmid RK2. The displacement of ColE1 by pBAD33 resulted in an almost random positioning of ColE1 foci in the cell and also in a loss of segregational stability, as evidenced by the large number of cells carrying pBAD33 with no visible ColE1 focus and as confirmed by ColE1 stability studies. The addition of the active partitioning systems of the F plasmid (sopABC) or RK2 (O(B1) incC korB) resulted in movement of the ColE1 replicon from the cell pole to within the nucleoid region. This repositioning did not result in destabilization but did result in an increase in the number of plasmid foci, most likely due to partial declustering. These results are consistent with the importance of par regions to the localization of plasmids to specific regions of the cell and demonstrate both localization and dynamic movement for a naturally occurring plasmid that does not encode a replication initiation protein or a partitioning system that is required for plasmid stability.

Resolving chromosome segregation in bacteria

Bacterial chromosomes are evenly distributed between daughter cells, however no equivalent eukaryotic mitotic apparatus has been identified yet. Nevertheless, an advance in our understanding of the dynamics of the bacterial chromosome has been accomplished in recent years by adopting fluorescence microscopy techniques to visualize living bacterial cells. Here, some of the most recent studies that yield new insights into the nature of bacterial chromosome dynamics are described. In addition, we review in detail the current models that attempt to illuminate the mechanism of chromosome segregation in bacteria and discuss the possibility that a bacterial mitotic apparatus does indeed exist.

Regular cellular distribution of plasmids by oscillating and filament-forming ParA ATPase of plasmid pB171

Centromere-like loci from bacteria segregate plasmids to progeny cells before cell division. The ParA ATPase (a MinD homologue) of the par2 locus from plasmid pB171 forms oscillating helical structures over the nucleoid. Here we show that par2 distributes plasmid foci regularly along the length of the cell even in cells with many plasmids. In vitro, ParA binds ATP and ADP and has a cooperative ATPase activity. Moreover, ParA forms ATP-dependent filaments and cables, suggesting that ParA can provide the mechanical force for the observed regular distribution of plasmids. ParA and ParB interact with each other in a bacterial two-hybrid assay but do not interact with FtsZ, eight other essential cell division proteins or MreB actin. Based on these observations, we propose a simple model for how oscillating ParA filaments can mediate regular cellular distribution of plasmids. The model functions without the involvement of partition-specific host cell receptors and is thus consistent with the striking observation that partition loci can function in heterologous host organisms.

Inhibition of protein and RNA synthesis in Escherichia coli results in declustering of plasmid RK2

Multi-copy plasmids in Escherichia coli are not randomly distributed throughout the cell but are present as clusters of plasmid molecules that are localized at preferred cellular locations. A plasmid RK2 derivative (pZZ15) that can be tagged with a green fluorescent protein-LacI fusion protein normally exists as clusters that are localized at the mid- and quarter-cell positions. In this study the effect of the protein synthesis inhibitor, chloramphenicol, and the RNA synthesis inhibitor, rifampicin, on RK2 clustering and localization was examined. The addition of either inhibitor to exponentially growing E. coli cells carrying pZZ15 results in a displacement of the position and a declustering of this multi-copy plasmid indicating that continued protein synthesis and RNA synthesis are required for clustering and localization of this plasmid. It is likely that it is not just the process of transcription or translation that is important for clustering but rather some host or plasmid encoded factor(s) that is required.

RepB protein of an Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid binds to two adjacent sites between repA and repB for plasmid partitioning and autorepression

Plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens replicate using the products of the repABC operon, which are highly conserved among plasmids and some chromosomes of the alpha-Proteobacteria. The products of repA and repB direct plasmid partitioning, while the repC gene encodes a replication initiator protein. The transcription of the repABC operon of tumour inducing (Ti) plasmids is both negatively autoregulated by the RepA and RepB proteins, and positively regulated by TraR. In the present study, we have identified a fourth gene (repD) in the repABC operon of an octopine-type Ti plasmid. repD is 78 codons in length, and maps between repA and repB genes. A repD-lacZ protein fusion demonstrated that repD is strongly expressed. Two identical binding sites for the RepB protein were found within the repD coding sequence, and these sites are required for plasmid stability and for maximal repression of repABC transcription. RepA protein enhances the binding of RepB at these binding sites, just as RepB increases the affinity of RepA for binding sites at the repABC P4 promoter. We propose that RepA and RepB form complexes that bind both sites, possibly causing a loop that is important for repression of the repABC operon. Binding at one or both sites may also be required for accurate plasmid partitioning.

The bacterial segrosome: a dynamic nucleoprotein machine for DNA trafficking and segregation

The genomes of unicellular and multicellular organisms must be partitioned equitably in coordination with cytokinesis to ensure faithful transmission of duplicated genetic material to daughter cells. Bacteria use sophisticated molecular mechanisms to guarantee accurate segregation of both plasmids and chromosomes at cell division. Plasmid segregation is most commonly mediated by a Walker-type ATPase and one of many DNA-binding proteins that assemble on a cis-acting centromere to form a nucleoprotein complex (the segrosome) that mediates intracellular plasmid transport. Bacterial chromosome segregation involves a multipartite strategy in which several discrete protein complexes potentially participate. Shedding light on the basis of genome segregation in bacteria could indicate new strategies aimed at combating pathogenic and antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Plasmid segregation mechanisms

Bacterial plasmids encode partitioning (par) loci that ensure ordered plasmid segregation prior to cell division. par loci come in two types: those that encode actin-like ATPases and those that encode deviant Walker-type ATPases. ParM, the actin-like ATPase of plasmid R1, forms dynamic filaments that segregate plasmids paired at mid-cell to daughter cells. Like microtubules, ParM filaments exhibit dynamic instability (i.e., catastrophic decay) whose regulation is an important component of the DNA segregation process. The Walker box ParA ATPases are related to MinD and form highly dynamic, oscillating filaments that are required for the subcellular movement and positioning of plasmids. The role of the observed ATPase oscillation is not yet understood. However, we propose a simple model that couples plasmid segregation to ParA oscillation. The model is consistent with the observed movement and localization patterns of plasmid foci and does not require the involvement of plasmid-specific host-encoded factors.

Plasmid R1--replication and its control

Plasmid R1 is a low-copy-number plasmid belonging to the IncFII group. The genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology, and physiology of R1 replication and its control are summarised and discussed in the present communication. Replication of R1 starts at a unique origin, oriR1, and proceeds unidirectionally according to the Theta mode. Plasmid R1 replicates during the entire cell cycle and the R1 copies in the cell are members of a pool from which a plasmid copy at random is selected for replication. However, there is an eclipse period during which a newly replicated copy does not belong to this pool. Replication of R1 is controlled by an antisense RNA, CopA, that is unstable and formed constitutively; hence, its concentration is a measure of the concentration of the plasmid. CopA-RNA interacts with its complementary target, CopT-RNA, that is located upstream of the RepA message on the repA-mRNA. CopA-RNA post-transcriptionally inhibits translation of the repA-mRNA. CopA- and CopT-RNA interact in a bimolecular reaction which results in an inverse proportionality between the relative rate of replication (replications per plasmid copy and cell cycle) and the copy number; the number of replications per cell and cell cycle, n, is independent of the actual copy number in the individual cells, the so-called +n mode of control. Single base-pair substitutions in the copA/copT region of the plasmid genome may result in mutants that are compatible with the wild type. Loss of CopA activity results in (uncontrolled) so-called runaway replication, which is lethal to the host but useful for the production of proteins from cloned genes. Plasmid R1 also has an ancillary control system, CopB, that derepresses the synthesis of repA-mRNA in cells that happen to contain lower than normal number of copies. Plasmid R1, as other plasmids, form clusters in the cell and plasmid replication is assumed to take place in the centre of the cells; this requires traffic from the cluster to the replication factories and back to the clusters. The clusters are plasmid-specific and presumably based on sequence homology.

Partition-associated incompatibility caused by random assortment of pure plasmid clusters

Summary Bacterial plasmids and chromosomes encode centromere-like partition loci that actively segregate DNA before cell division. The molecular mechanism behind DNA segregation in bacteria is largely unknown. Here we analyse the mechanism of partition-associated incompatibility for plasmid pB171, a phenotype associated with all known plasmid-encoded centromere loci. An R1 plasmid carrying par2 from plasmid pB171 was destabilized by the presence of an F plasmid carrying parC1, parC2 or the entire par2 locus of pB171. Strikingly, cytological double-labelling experiments revealed no evidence of long-lived pairing of plasmids. Instead, pure R1 and F foci were positioned along the length of the cell, and in a random order. Thus, our results raise the possibility that partition-mediated plasmid incompatibility is not caused by pairing of heterologous plasmids but instead by random positioning of pure plasmid clusters along the long axis of the cell. The strength of the incompatibility was correlated with the capability of the plasmids to compete for the mid-cell position.

Origin pairing ('handcuffing') and unpairing in the control of P1 plasmid replication

The P1 plasmid origin has an array of five binding sites (iterons) for the plasmid-encoded initiator protein RepA. Saturation of these sites is required for initiation. Iterons can also pair via their bound RepAs. The reaction, called handcuffing, is believed to be the key to control initiation negatively. Here we have determined some of the mechanistic details of the reaction. We show that handcuffed RepA-iteron complexes dissociate when they are diluted or challenged with cold competitor iterons, suggesting spontaneous reversibility of the handcuffing reaction. The complex formation increases with increased RepA binding, but decreases upon saturation of binding. Complex formation also decreases in the presence of molecular chaperones (DnaK and DnaJ) that convert RepA dimers to monomers. This indicates that dimers participate in handcuffing, and that chaperones are involved in reversing handcuffing. They could play a direct role by reducing dimers and an indirect role by increasing monomers that would compete out the weaker binding dimers from the origin. We propose that an increased monomer to dimer ratio is the key to reverse handcuffing.

Gyrase inhibitors and thymine starvation disrupt the normal pattern of plasmid RK2 localization in Escherichia coli

Multicopy plasmids in Escherichia coli are not randomly distributed throughout the cell but exist as defined clusters that are localized at the mid-cell, or at the 1/4 and 3/4 cell length positions. To explore the factors that contribute to plasmid clustering and localization, E. coli cells carrying a plasmid RK2 derivative that can be tagged with a green fluorescent protein-LacI fusion protein were subjected to various conditions that interfere with plasmid superhelicity and/or DNA replication. The various treatments included thymine starvation and the addition of the gyrase inhibitors nalidixic acid and novobiocin. In each case, localization of plasmid clusters at the preferred positions was disrupted but the plasmids remained in clusters, suggesting that normal plasmid superhelicity and DNA synthesis in elongating cells are not required for the clustering of individual plasmid molecules. It was also observed that the inhibition of DNA replication by these treatments produced filaments in which the plasmid clusters were confined to one or two nucleoid bodies, which were located near the midline of the filament and were not evenly spaced throughout the filament, as is found in cells treated with cephalexin. Finally, the enhanced yellow fluorescent protein-RarA fusion protein was used to localize the replication complex in individual E. coli cells. Novobiocin and nalidixic acid treatment both resulted in rapid loss of RarA foci. Under these conditions the RK2 plasmid clusters were not disassembled, suggesting that a completely intact replication complex is not required for plasmid clustering.

Compartmentalization of prokaryotic DNA replication

It becomes now apparent that prokaryotic DNA replication takes place at specific intracellular locations. Early studies indicated that chromosomal DNA replication, as well as plasmid and viral DNA replication, occurs in close association with the bacterial membrane. Moreover, over the last several years, it has been shown that some replication proteins and specific DNA sequences are localized to particular subcellular regions in bacteria, supporting the existence of replication compartments. Although the mechanisms underlying compartmentalization of prokaryotic DNA replication are largely unknown, the docking of replication factors to large organizing structures may be important for the assembly of active replication complexes. In this article, we review the current state of this subject in two bacterial species, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, focusing our attention in both chromosomal and extrachromosomal DNA replication. A comparison with eukaryotic systems is also presented.

Probing plasmid partition with centromere-based incompatibility

Low-copy number plasmids of bacteria rely on specific centromeres for regular partition into daughter cells. When also present on a second plasmid, the centromere can render the two plasmids incompatible, disrupting partition and causing plasmid loss. We have investigated the basis of incompatibility exerted by the F plasmid centromere, sopC, to probe the mechanism of partition. Measurements of the effects of sopC at various gene dosages on destabilization of mini-F, on repression of the sopAB operon and on occupancy of mini-F DNA by the centromere-binding protein, SopB, revealed that among mechanisms previously proposed, no single one fully explained incompatibility. sopC on multicopy plasmids depleted SopB by titration and by contributing to repression. The resulting SopB deficit is proposed to delay partition complex formation and facilitate pairing between mini-F and the centromere vector, thereby increasing randomization of segregation. Unexpectedly, sopC on mini-P1 exerted strong incompatibility if the P1 parABS locus was absent. A mutation preventing the P1 replication initiation protein from pairing (handcuffing) reduced this strong incompatibility to the level expected for random segregation. The results indicate the importance of kinetic considerations and suggest that mini-F handcuffing promotes pairing of SopB-sopC complexes that can subsequently segregate as intact aggregates.

Multicopy plasmids affect replisome positioning in Bacillus subtilis

The DNA replication machinery, various regions of the chromosome, and some plasmids occupy characteristic subcellular positions in bacterial cells. We visualized the location of a multicopy plasmid, pHP13, in living cells of Bacillus subtilis using an array of lac operators and LacI-green fluorescent protein (GFP). In the majority of cells, plasmids appeared to be highly mobile and randomly distributed. In a small fraction of cells, there appeared to be clusters of plasmids located predominantly at or near a cell pole. We also monitored the effects of the presence of multicopy plasmids on the position of DNA polymerase using a fusion of a subunit of DNA polymerase to GFP. Many of the plasmid-containing cells had extra foci of the replisome, and these were often found at uncharacteristic locations in the cell. Some of the replisome foci were dynamic and highly mobile, similar to what was observed for the plasmid. In contrast, replisome foci in plasmid-free cells were relatively stationary. Our results indicate that in B. subtilis, plasmid-associated replisomes are recruited to the subcellular position of the plasmid. Extending this notion to the chromosome, we postulated that the subcellular position of the chromosomally associated replisome is established by the subcellular location of oriC at the time of initiation of replication.

Bacterial mitosis: partitioning protein ParA oscillates in spiral-shaped structures and positions plasmids at mid-cell

The par2 locus of Escherichia coli plasmid pB171 encodes oscillating ATPase ParA, DNA binding protein ParB and two cis-acting DNA regions to which ParB binds (parC1 and parC2). Three independent techniques were used to investigate the subcellular localization of plasmids carrying par2. In cells with a single plasmid focus, the focus located preferentially at mid-cell. In cells with two foci, these located at quarter-cell positions. In the absence of ParB and parC1/parC2, ParA-GFP formed stationary helices extending from one end of the nucleoid to the other. In the presence of ParB and parC1/parC2, ParA-GFP oscillated in spiral-shaped structures. Amino acid substitutions in ParA simultaneously abolished ParA spiral formation, oscillation and either plasmid localization or plasmid separation at mid-cell. Therefore, our results suggest that ParA spirals position plasmids at the middle of the bacterial nucleoid and subsequently separate them into daughter cells.

Kinetics of plasmid segregation in Escherichia coli

Low copy-number bacterial replicons occupy specific locations in their host cells. Production of a GFP-Lac repressor hybrid protein in cells carrying F or P1 plasmids tagged with a lac operator array reveals that in smaller (younger) cells these plasmids are seen mainly as a single fluorescent focus at mid-cell, whereas larger cells tend to have two foci, one at each quarter-cell position. Duplication of the central focus is presumed to represent active partition of plasmid copies. We report here our investigation by time-lapse microscopy of the subsequent movement of these copies to the quarter positions. Following duplication of the central focus, the new foci migrated rapidly and directly to their quarter-cell destinations, where they remained until the next cell cycle. The speed of movement was about five times faster than poleward migration of oriC and 50 times faster than cell elongation. Aberrant positioning of mini-F lacking its sopC centromere demonstrated the requirement for the partition system in this localization process. From the measured number of F plasmid copies per cell it appears that each migrating focus contains two or more plasmid molecules. The molecular basis of this clustering, and evidence for phasing of the partition event in the cell cycle, are discussed.

Bacterial mitosis: ParM of plasmid R1 moves plasmid DNA by an actin-like insertional polymerization mechanism

Bacterial DNA segregation takes place in an active and ordered fashion. In the case of Escherichia coli plasmid R1, the partitioning system (par) separates paired plasmid copies and moves them to opposite cell poles. Here we address the mechanism by which the three components of the R1 par system act together to generate the force required for plasmid movement during segregation. ParR protein binds cooperatively to the centromeric parC DNA region, thereby forming a complex that interacts with the filament-forming actin-like ParM protein in an ATP-dependent manner, suggesting that plasmid movement is powered by insertional polymerization of ParM. Consistently, we find that segregating plasmids are positioned at the ends of extending ParM filaments. Thus, the process of R1 plasmid segregation in E. coli appears to be mechanistically analogous to the actin-based motility operating in eukaryotic cells. In addition, we find evidence suggesting that plasmid pairing is required for ParM polymerization.

Clustering versus random segregation of plasmids lacking a partitioning function: a plasmid paradox?

Plasmids lacking a functional partition system are randomly distributed to the daughter cells; plasmid-free daughter cells are formed with a frequency of (1/2)2n per cell and cell generation where 2n is the (average) copy number at cell division. Hence, the unit of segregation is one plasmid copy. However, plasmids form clusters in the cells. A putative solution to this potential paradox is presented: one plasmid copy at a time is recruited from the plasmid clusters to the replication factories that are located in the cell centres. Hence, replication offers the means of declustering that is necessary in a growing host population. The daughter copies diffuse freely and each copy may with equal probability end up in either of the two cell halves. In this way, the random segregation of the plasmids is coupled to replication and occurs continuously during the cell cycle, and is not linked to cell division. The unit of segregation is the plasmid copy and not the plasmid clusters. In contrast, the two daughters of a Par+ plasmid are directed in opposite directions by the plasmid-encoded partition system, thereby assuring that each daughter cell receives the plasmid.

Dynamic cellular location of bacterial plasmids

Recent studies have shown that plasmids are organized inside bacterial cells in a remarkably complex way. Plasmids containing active partitioning systems are tethered to specific regions of the cell, and the number and position of plasmid molecules within the cell are coordinated with the bacterial host cell cycle and growth rate. Plasmids belonging to different incompatibility groups are also tethered to different sites within the cell, and segregate at different times relative to one another and to the bacterial cell cycle. Recent studies suggest that many of these observations regarding subcellular plasmid dynamics formulated for Escherichia coli plasmids may be broadly conserved.

Compatible bacterial plasmids are targeted to independent cellular locations in Escherichia coli

Targeting of DNA molecules to specific subcellular positions is essential for efficient segregation, but the mechanisms underlying these processes are poorly understood. In Escherichia coli, several plasmids belonging to different incompatibility groups (F, P1 and RK2) localize preferentially near the midcell and quartercell positions. Here we compare the relative positions of these three plasmids using fluorescence in situ hybridization. When plasmids F and P1 were localized simultaneously using differentially labeled probes, the majority of foci (approximately 75%) were well separated from each other. Similar results were found when we compared the subcellular localization of F with RK2, and RK2 with P1: regardless of the number of foci per cell or growth conditions, most of the foci (70-80%) were not in close proximity to one another. We also localized RK2 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Vibrio cholerae, and found that plasmid RK2 localization is conserved across bacterial species. Our results suggest that each plasmid has its own unique subcellular address, implying a mechanism for the stable co-existence of plasmids in which subcellular targeting plays a major role.

The active partition gene incC of IncP plasmids is required for stable maintenance in a broad range of hosts

Plasmids of incompatibility group P (IncP) are capable of replication and stable inheritance in a wide variety of gram-negative bacteria. Three determinants of IncP plasmids are components of an active partition locus that is predicted to function in the segregation of plasmid copies to daughter cells. These determinants are incC, which codes for a member of the ParA family of partition ATPases; korB, which specifies a DNA-binding protein that also functions as a global transcriptional repressor; and O(B), the DNA target for KorB, which occurs at multiple locations on IncP plasmids. To determine the importance and host range of the IncC/KorB partition system in the maintenance of IncP plasmids, we constructed an in-frame deletion of incC in the otherwise intact 60-kb IncP alpha plasmid R995. R995 Delta incC was found to be highly unstable in Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, whereas wild-type R995 is stable in all these hosts. In addition, R995 Delta incC could not be established in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. trans-Complementation analysis showed that the coding region for IncC2 polypeptide, which is expressed from an internal translational start within the incC gene, was sufficient to restore stable maintenance to wild-type levels. The results show that the IncC/KorB active partition system of IncP plasmids is remarkably proficient for stable maintenance in diverse bacteria.

The RepA protein of plasmid pSC101 controls Escherichia coli cell division through the SOS response

Although plasmid copy number varies widely among different plasmid species, normally copy number is maintained within a narrow range for any given plasmid. Such copy number control has been shown to occur by regulation of the rate of plasmid DNA replication. Here we report a novel mechanism by which the pSC101 plasmid also can detect an imbalance between the cellular level of its replication protein, RepA, and plasmid-borne RepA binding sites to inhibit bacterial DNA replication and delay host cell division when RepA is in relative excess. We show that delayed cell division occurs by RepA-mediated induction of the SOS response and can be reversed by over-expression of the host DNA primase, DnaG. The effects of RepA excess are prevented by introducing a surfeit of RepA binding sites. The mechanism reported here may help to limit variation in plasmid copy number and allow repopulation of cells with plasmids when copy number falls--potentially pre-empting plasmid loss in cultures of dividing cells.

The bacterial ParA-ParB partitioning proteins

A pair of genes designated parA and parB are encoded by many low copy number plasmids and bacterial chromosomes. They work with one or more cis-acting sites termed centromere-like sequences to ensure better than random predivisional partitioning of the DNA molecule that encodes them. The centromere-like sequences nucleate binding of ParB and titrate sufficient protein to create foci, which are easily visible by immuno-fluorescence microscopy. These foci normally follow the plasmid or the chromosomal replication oriC complexes. ParA is a membrane-associated ATPase that is essential for this symmetric movement of the ParB foci. In Bacillus subtilis ParA oscillates from end to end of the cell as does MinD of E. coli, a relative of the ParA family. ParA may facilitate ParB movement along the inner surface of the cytoplasmic membrane to encounter and become tethered to the next replication zone. The ATP-bound form of ParA appears to adopt the conformation needed to drive partition. Hydrolysis to create ParA-ADP or free ParA appears to favour a form that is not located at the pole and binds to DNA rather than the partition complex. Definition of the protein domains needed for interaction with membranes and the conformational changes that occur on interaction with ATP/ADP will provide insights into the partitioning mechanism and possible targets for inhibitors of partitioning.

Multicopy plasmids are clustered and localized in Escherichia coli

We localized the multicopy plasmid RK2 in Escherichia coli and found that the number of fluorescent foci observed in each cell was substantially less than the copy number of the plasmid, suggesting that many copies of RK2 are grouped into a few multiplasmid clusters. In minimal glucose media, the majority of cells had one or two foci, with a single focus localized near midcell, and two foci near the 1/4 and 3/4 cell positions. The number of foci per cell increased with cell length and with growth rate, and decreased upon entering stationary phase, suggesting a coordination of RK2 replication or segregation with the bacterial cell cycle. Time-lapse microscopy demonstrated that partitioning of RK2 foci is achieved by the splitting of a single focus into two or three smaller foci, which are capable of separating with rapid kinetics. A derivative of the high-copy-number plasmid pUC19 containing the lacO array was also localized by tagging with GFP-LacI. Whereas many of the cells contained numerous, randomly diffusing foci, most cells exhibited one or two plasmid clusters located at midcell or the cell quarter positions. Our results suggest a model in which multicopy plasmids are not always randomly diffusing throughout the cell as previously thought, but can be replicated and partitioned in clusters targeted to specific locations.

Partitioning of the Escherichia coli chromosome: superhelicity and condensation

Segregation in Escherichia coli, the process of separating the replicated chromosomes into daughter progeny cells, seems to start long before the duplication of the genome reaches completion. Soon after initiation in mid-cell region, the daughter oriCs rapidly move apart to fixed positions inside the cell (quarter length positions from each pole) and are anchored there by yet unknown mechanism(s). As replication proceeds, the rest of the chromosome is sequentially unwound and then refolded. At termination, the two sister chromosomes are unlinked by decatenation and separated by supercoiling and/or condensation. Muk and Seq proteins are involved in different stages of this replication-cum-partition process and thus can be categorized as important partition proteins along with topoisomerases. E. coli strains, lacking mukB or seqA functions, are defective in segregation and cell division. The nucleoids in these mutant strains exhibit altered condensation and superhelicity as can be demonstrated by sedimentation analysis and by fluorescence microscopy. As the supercoiling of an extrachromosomal element (a plasmid DNA) was also influenced by the mukB and seqA mutations we concluded that the MukB and SeqA proteins are possibly involved in maintaining the general supercoiling activity in the cell. The segregation of E. coli chromosome might therefore be predominantly driven by factors that operate by affecting the superhelicity and condensation of the nucleoid (MukB, SeqA, topoisomerases and additional unknown proteins). A picture thus emerges in which replication and partition are no longer compartmentalized into separable stages with clear gaps (S and M phases in eukaryotes) but are parallel processes that proceed concomitantly through a cell cycle continuum.

Role of the mukB gene in chromosome and plasmid partition in Escherichia coli

The intracellular locations of oriC and oriR1, the replication origins of the chromosome and plasmid R1, respectively, were visualized by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in exponentially growing populations of Escherichia coli. The locations of oriC and oriR1 (from a Par+ R1 plasmid) were unique and different in the wild-type host. In a mukB mutant, the positions were perturbed for both origins. The position of oriR1 from a plasmid with active partition (Par+) in the mukB host was as randomized as that of oriR1 from the Par- plasmid in a wild-type host. However, this mukB-induced randomization did not result in unstable inheritance of the Par+ plasmid, as measured by the conventional segregation assay. This might result from the preferential association of the Par+ plasmid with the bigger, decondensed nucleoid-containing daughters during cell division of MukB- cells, whereas the Par- plasmids were distributed at random and were lost by frequently ending up in anucleate cells.