Distinguishing States of Arrest: Genome-Wide Descriptions of Cellular Quiescence Using ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq Analysis

Both intrinsic and microenvironmental factors contribute to the regulation of stem cell quiescence

Precise regulation of stem cell quiescence is essential for tissue development and homeostasis. Therefore, its aberrant regulation is intimately correlated with various human diseases. However, the detailed mechanisms of stem cell quiescence and its specific role in the pathogenesis of various diseases remain to be determined. Recent studies have revealed that the intrinsic and microenvironmental factors are the potential candidates responsible for the orderly switch between the dormant and activated states of stem cells. In addition, defects in signaling pathways related to internal and external factors of stem cells might contribute to the initiation and development of diseases by altering the dormancy of stem cells. In this review, we focus on the mechanisms underlying stem cell quiescence, especially the involvement of intrinsic and microenvironmental factors. In addition, we discuss the relationship between the anomalies of stem cell quiescence and related diseases, hopefully providing therapeutic insights for developing novel treatments.

A transcriptionally repressed quiescence program is associated with paused RNAPII and is poised for cell cycle reentry

Adult stem cells persist in mammalian tissues by entering a state of reversible quiescence/ G0, associated with low transcription. Using cultured myoblasts and muscle stem cells, we report that in G0, global RNA content and synthesis are substantially repressed, correlating with decreased RNA Polymerase II (RNAPII) expression and activation. Integrating RNAPII occupancy and transcriptome profiling, we identify repressed networks and a role for promoter-proximal RNAPII pausing in G0. Strikingly, RNAPII shows enhanced pausing in G0 on repressed genes encoding regulators of RNA biogenesis (Nucleolin, Rps24, Ctdp1); release of pausing is associated with their increased expression in G1. Knockdown of these transcripts in proliferating cells leads to induction of G0 markers, confirming the importance of their repression in establishment of G0. A targeted screen of RNAPII regulators revealed that knockdown of Aff4 (positive regulator of elongation) unexpectedly enhances expression of G0-stalled genes and hastens S phase; NELF, a regulator of pausing appears to be dispensable. We propose that RNAPII pausing contributes to transcriptional control of a subset of G0-repressed genes to maintain quiescence and impacts the timing of the G0-G1 transition.

Is There a Histone Code for Cellular Quiescence?

Many of the cells in our bodies are quiescent, that is, temporarily not dividing. Under certain physiological conditions such as during tissue repair and maintenance, quiescent cells receive the appropriate stimulus and are induced to enter the cell cycle. The ability of cells to successfully transition into and out of a quiescent state is crucial for many biological processes including wound healing, stem cell maintenance, and immunological responses. Across species and tissues, transcriptional, epigenetic, and chromosomal changes associated with the transition between proliferation and quiescence have been analyzed, and some consistent changes associated with quiescence have been identified. Histone modifications have been shown to play a role in chromatin packing and accessibility, nucleosome mobility, gene expression, and chromosome arrangement. In this review, we critically evaluate the role of different histone marks in these processes during quiescence entry and exit. We consider different model systems for quiescence, each of the most frequently monitored candidate histone marks, and the role of their writers, erasers and readers. We highlight data that support these marks contributing to the changes observed with quiescence. We specifically ask whether there is a quiescence histone “code,” a mechanism whereby the language encoded by specific combinations of histone marks is read and relayed downstream to modulate cell state and function. We conclude by highlighting emerging technologies that can be applied to gain greater insight into the role of a histone code for quiescence.

Towards a Framework for Better Understanding of Quiescent Cancer Cells

Quiescent cancer cells (QCCs) are cancer cells that are reversibly suspended in G₀ phase with the ability to re-enter the cell cycle and initiate tumor growth, and, ultimately, cancer recurrence and metastasis. QCCs are also therapeutically challenging due to their resistance to most conventional cancer treatments that selectively act on proliferating cells. Considering the significant impact of QCCs on cancer progression and treatment, better understanding of appropriate experimental models, and the evaluation of QCCs are key questions in the field that have direct influence on potential pharmacological interventions. Here, this review focuses on existing and emerging preclinical models and detection methods for QCCs and discusses their respective features and scope for application. By providing a framework for selecting appropriate experimental models and investigative methods, the identification of the key players that regulate the survival and activation of QCCs and the development of more effective QCC-targeting therapeutic agents may mitigate the consequences of QCCs.

Comparative nuclear matrix proteome analysis of skeletal muscle cells in different cellular states

The nuclear matrix (NuMat) serves as the structural framework for organizing and maintaining nuclear architecture, however, the mechanisms by which this non-chromatin compartment is constructed and regulated are poorly understood. This study presents a proteomic analysis of the NuMat isolated from cultured skeletal muscle cells in three distinct cellular states- proliferating myoblasts (MBs), terminally differentiated myotubes (MTs), and mitotically quiescent (G0) myoblasts. About 40% of the proteins identified were found to be common in the NuMat proteome of these morphologically and functionally distinct cell states. These proteins, termed as the "core NuMat," define the stable, conserved, structural constituent of the nucleus, with functions such as RNA splicing, cytoskeletal organization, and chromatin modification, while the remaining NuMat proteins showed cell-state specificity, consistent with a more dynamic and potentially regulatory function. Specifically, myoblast NuMat was enriched in cell cycle, DNA replication and repair proteins, myotube NuMat in muscle differentiation and muscle function proteins, while G0 NuMat was enriched in metabolic, transcription, and transport proteins. These findings offer a new perspective for a cell-state-specific role of nuclear architecture and spatial organization, integrated with diverse cellular processes, and implicate NuMat proteins in the control of the cell cycle, lineage commitment, and differentiation.