1
|
Liu W, Sun X, Yang L, Li K, Yang Y, Fu X. NSCGRN: a network structure control method for gene regulatory network inference. Brief Bioinform 2022; 23:6585392. [PMID: 35554485 DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbac156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Accurate inference of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) is an essential premise for understanding pathogenesis and curing diseases. Various computational methods have been developed for GRN inference, but the identification of redundant regulation remains a challenge faced by researchers. Although combining global and local topology can identify and reduce redundant regulations, the topologies' specific forms and cooperation modes are unclear and real regulations may be sacrificed. Here, we propose a network structure control method [network-structure-controlling-based GRN inference method (NSCGRN)] that stipulates the global and local topology's specific forms and cooperation mode. The method is carried out in a cooperative mode of 'global topology dominates and local topology refines'. Global topology requires layering and sparseness of the network, and local topology requires consistency of the subgraph association pattern with the network motifs (fan-in, fan-out, cascade and feedforward loop). Specifically, an ordered gene list is obtained by network topology centrality sorting. A Bernaola-Galvan mutation detection algorithm applied to the list gives the hierarchy of GRNs to control the upstream and downstream regulations within the global scope. Finally, four network motifs are integrated into the hierarchy to optimize local complex regulations and form a cooperative mode where global and local topologies play the dominant and refined roles, respectively. NSCGRN is compared with state-of-the-art methods on three different datasets (six networks in total), and it achieves the highest F1 and Matthews correlation coefficient. Experimental results show its unique advantages in GRN inference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Liu
- Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computing and Information Processing of Ministry of Education, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, 411105, China.,School of Computer Science, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, 411105, China
| | - Xingen Sun
- School of Computer Science, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, 411105, China.,Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computing and Information Processing of Ministry of Education, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, 411105, China
| | - Li Yang
- Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computing and Information Processing of Ministry of Education, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, 411105, China
| | - Kaiwen Li
- Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China
| | - Yu Yang
- School of Computer Science, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, 411105, China.,Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computing and Information Processing of Ministry of Education, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, 411105, China
| | - Xiangzheng Fu
- College of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, 410000, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rocca A, Kholodenko BN. Can Systems Biology Advance Clinical Precision Oncology? Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:6312. [PMID: 34944932 PMCID: PMC8699328 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision oncology is perceived as a way forward to treat individual cancer patients. However, knowing particular cancer mutations is not enough for optimal therapeutic treatment, because cancer genotype-phenotype relationships are nonlinear and dynamic. Systems biology studies the biological processes at the systems' level, using an array of techniques, ranging from statistical methods to network reconstruction and analysis, to mathematical modeling. Its goal is to reconstruct the complex and often counterintuitive dynamic behavior of biological systems and quantitatively predict their responses to environmental perturbations. In this paper, we review the impact of systems biology on precision oncology. We show examples of how the analysis of signal transduction networks allows to dissect resistance to targeted therapies and inform the choice of combinations of targeted drugs based on tumor molecular alterations. Patient-specific biomarkers based on dynamical models of signaling networks can have a greater prognostic value than conventional biomarkers. These examples support systems biology models as valuable tools to advance clinical and translational oncological research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Rocca
- Hygiene and Public Health, Local Health Unit of Romagna, 47121 Forlì, Italy
| | - Boris N. Kholodenko
- Systems Biology Ireland, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
- Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Freilich MA, Rebolledo R, Corcoran D, Marquet PA. Reconstructing ecological networks with noisy dynamics. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci 2020; 476:20190739. [PMID: 32523410 DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2019.0739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Ecosystems functioning is based on an intricate web of interactions among living entities. Most of these interactions are difficult to observe, especially when the diversity of interacting entities is large and they are of small size and abundance. To sidestep this limitation, it has become common to infer the network structure of ecosystems from time series of species abundance, but it is not clear how well can networks be reconstructed, especially in the presence of stochasticity that propagates through ecological networks. We evaluate the effects of intrinsic noise and network topology on the performance of different methods of inferring network structure from time-series data. Analysis of seven different four-species motifs using a stochastic model demonstrates that star-shaped motifs are differentially detected by these methods while rings are differentially constructed. The ability to reconstruct the network is unaffected by the magnitude of stochasticity in the population dynamics. Instead, interaction between the stochastic and deterministic parts of the system determines the path that the whole system takes to equilibrium and shapes the species covariance. We highlight the effects of long transients on the path to equilibrium and suggest a path forward for developing more ecologically sound statistical techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara A Freilich
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology-Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Joint Program, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Rolando Rebolledo
- Instituto de Ingeniería Matemática, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
| | - Derek Corcoran
- Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Pablo A Marquet
- Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.,Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad (IEB), Santiago, Chile.,The Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA.,Instituto de Sistemas Complejos de Valparaíso (ISCV), Valparaíso, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sonawane AR, Weiss ST, Glass K, Sharma A. Network Medicine in the Age of Biomedical Big Data. Front Genet 2019; 10:294. [PMID: 31031797 PMCID: PMC6470635 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2018] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Network medicine is an emerging area of research dealing with molecular and genetic interactions, network biomarkers of disease, and therapeutic target discovery. Large-scale biomedical data generation offers a unique opportunity to assess the effect and impact of cellular heterogeneity and environmental perturbations on the observed phenotype. Marrying the two, network medicine with biomedical data provides a framework to build meaningful models and extract impactful results at a network level. In this review, we survey existing network types and biomedical data sources. More importantly, we delve into ways in which the network medicine approach, aided by phenotype-specific biomedical data, can be gainfully applied. We provide three paradigms, mainly dealing with three major biological network archetypes: protein-protein interaction, expression-based, and gene regulatory networks. For each of these paradigms, we discuss a broad overview of philosophies under which various network methods work. We also provide a few examples in each paradigm as a test case of its successful application. Finally, we delineate several opportunities and challenges in the field of network medicine. We hope this review provides a lexicon for researchers from biological sciences and network theory to come on the same page to work on research areas that require interdisciplinary expertise. Taken together, the understanding gained from combining biomedical data with networks can be useful for characterizing disease etiologies and identifying therapeutic targets, which, in turn, will lead to better preventive medicine with translational impact on personalized healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhijeet R. Sonawane
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Scott T. Weiss
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kimberly Glass
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Amitabh Sharma
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Center for Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular Sciences, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|