1
|
Nezhat FR, Cathcart AM, Nezhat CH, Nezhat CR. Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications of Ovarian Endometriomas. Obstet Gynecol 2024; 143:759-766. [PMID: 38626453 PMCID: PMC11090516 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
Ovarian endometriomas affect many patients with endometriosis and have significant effects on quality of life, fertility, and risk of malignancy. Endometriomas range from small (1-3 cm), densely fibrotic cysts to large (20 cm or greater) cysts with varying degrees of fibrosis. Endometriomas are hypothesized to form from endometriotic invasion or metaplasia of functional cysts or alternatively from ovarian surface endometriosis that bleeds into the ovarian cortex. Different mechanisms of endometrioma formation may help explain the phenotypic variability observed among endometriomas. Laparoscopic surgery is the preferred first-line modality of diagnosis and treatment of endometriomas. Ovarian cystectomy is preferred over cyst ablation or sclerotherapy for enabling pathologic diagnosis, improving symptoms, preventing recurrence, and optimizing fertility outcomes. Cystectomy for small, densely adherent endometriomas is made challenging by dense fibrosis of the cyst capsule obliterating the plane with normal ovarian cortex, whereas cystectomy for large endometriomas can carry unique challenges as a result of adhesions between the cyst and pelvic structures. Preoperative and postoperative hormonal suppression can improve operative outcomes and decrease the risk of endometrioma recurrence. Whether the optimal management, fertility consequences, and malignant potential of endometriomas vary on the basis of size and phenotype remains to be fully explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farr R Nezhat
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, and NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, New York; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; the Atlanta Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Reproductive Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; and the Center for Special Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, and Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, and the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pecorino B, Laganà AS, Chiantera V, Ferrara M, Di Stefano AB, Di Donna MC, Sorrentino F, Nappi L, Mikuš M, Scollo P. Progression Free Survival, Overall Survival, and Relapse Rate in Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer and Synchronous Endometrial-Ovarian Endometrioid Cancer (SEO-EC): Results from a Large Retrospective Analysis. Medicina (B Aires) 2022; 58:medicina58121706. [PMID: 36556908 PMCID: PMC9784653 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58121706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: We aimed to evaluate Progression Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), and relapse rate in women affected by endometrioid ovarian cancer and synchronous endometrial-ovarian endometrioid cancer (SEO-EC). As secondary outcome, we assessed whether systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy could be considered a determinant of relapse rate in this population. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of women with diagnosis of endometrioid ovarian cancer or SEO-EC between January 2010 to September 2020, and calculated PFS, OS and relapse rate. Results: In almost all the patients (97.6%) who underwent systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, there were no lymph node metastases confirmed by histology. We did not find a significant difference (p = 0.6570) for the rate of relapse in the group of women who underwent systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (4/42; 9.5%) compared with the group of women who did not undergo the same procedure (1/21; 4.8%). During a median follow-up was 23 months, both PFS and OS were excellent. Conclusions: Women affected by early-stage low-grade endometrioid cancer and SEO-EC without apparent lymph node involvement at pre-operative imaging showed a very low rate of lymph node metastasis and similar relapse rate with or without lymphadenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basilio Pecorino
- Maternal and Child Department, Obstetrics and Gynecology Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Enna “Kore”, 95126 Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS “Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli”, 90127 Palermo, Italy
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS “Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli”, 90127 Palermo, Italy
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
| | - Martina Ferrara
- Maternal and Child Department, Obstetrics and Gynecology Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Enna “Kore”, 95126 Catania, Italy
| | - Andrea Benedetto Di Stefano
- Maternal and Child Department, Obstetrics and Gynecology Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Enna “Kore”, 95126 Catania, Italy
| | - Mariano Catello Di Donna
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS “Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli”, 90127 Palermo, Italy
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences (Di. Chir. On. S.), University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
| | - Felice Sorrentino
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy
| | - Luigi Nappi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy
| | - Mislav Mikuš
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Paolo Scollo
- Maternal and Child Department, Obstetrics and Gynecology Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Enna “Kore”, 95126 Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vetvicka V, Fiala L, Garzon S, Buzzaccarini G, Terzic M, Laganà AS. Endometriosis and gynaecological cancers: molecular insights behind a complex machinery. PRZEGLAD MENOPAUZALNY = MENOPAUSE REVIEW 2021; 20:201-206. [PMID: 35069072 PMCID: PMC8764963 DOI: 10.5114/pm.2021.111276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Endometriosis is described as the presence of both endometrial glandular and stromal cells outside the uterine cavity. A major characterization of this disease is ectopic implantation of endometrial cells with increased migration. It is one of the leading causes of morbidity among premenopausal women, with a prevalence of 10-16% of women of reproductive age. Despite over century of intensive research, none of the current treatment options represents a real cure. Based on the current knowledge, endometriosis, particularly its atypical version, is considered to be a transitional form from benign disease to tumour. However, the exact mechanisms of this conversion are still not fully established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaclav Vetvicka
- Department of Pathology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
| | - Ludek Fiala
- Institute of Sexology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Simone Garzon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Milan Terzic
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan
- Clinical Academic Department of Women's Health, National Research Center of Mother and Child Health, University Medical Center, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Filippo Del Ponte” Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Endometriosis will affect about 10% of the female population and not only can it significantly impact adversely on quality of life and result in infertility, but data are accumulating that malignant transformation is an important consideration. Endometriosis can be histologically typical or atypical, ovarian, superficial peritoneal or deep infiltrating. The precursor for malignant transformation appears to be the ovarian atypical endometriosis component. Ovarian cancer is the most important associated cancer, primarily endometrioid and clear cell cancer. These are the only subtypes wherein a direct clonal relationship between endometriosis, as a direct precursor, and cancer has been made. There is no substantive evidence to support an altered association of borderline cancers of the ovary, serous ovarian cancers and breast, endometrial or cervical cancers. This review provides an overview of the prevailing data pertaining to the molecular and genetic aberrations that accompany the transformation of atypical endometriosis to malignancy and the accumulated epidemiologic evidence which supports the association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Guidozzi
- Parklane Clinic, Johannesburg, South Africa.,University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sorbi F, Capezzuoli T, Saso S, Fambrini M, Corda M, Fantappiè G, Petraglia F. The relation between endometrioma and ovarian cancer. Minerva Obstet Gynecol 2021; 73:347-353. [PMID: 34008389 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-606x.21.04757-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The relationship between endometrioma and ovarian cancer is a topic of discussion in the field of endometriosis and to date it is still debated whether ovarian endometriosis may represent a risk factor for ovarian cancers. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A literature search was carried out using Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline and Google Scholar up to October 2020. Primary outcome of interest was ovarian cancer incidence in patients with endometriosis. Secondary outcome was ovarian cancer prognosis in patients with endometriosis compared to patient without endometriosis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Patients with ovarian endometriosis has a slight increase risk of developing ovarian cancer (merely 1.8%), being the general population risk for ovarian cancer 1.31%. In patient at postmenopausal age, long-lasting endometriosis, early-age diagnosis, infertility and/or infertility treatment the risk of developing ovarian cancer is higher. Endometriosis-related ovarian cancers are generally clear cell and endometrioid and are diagnosed at early stage compared to non-endometriosis related ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS The lifetime risk for ovarian cancer is low in endometriosis patients in general and higher in subgroups of patients allowing a tailored management based on patient characteristics. Endometriosis is a chronic disease negatively affecting the quality of life, nonetheless, concerns on ovarian cancer should be avoided in order to reduce the burden of the disease on women's health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavia Sorbi
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy -
| | - Tommaso Capezzuoli
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Massimiliano Fambrini
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Martina Corda
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulia Fantappiè
- Division Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Maternity and Infancy, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Felice Petraglia
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang X, Li M, Tang Z, Li X, Song T. Differentiation between endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers and non- endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers based on magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20201441. [PMID: 33882252 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20201441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) patients show different clinical characteristics compared with non-EAOC patients. However, a few studies are focused on the imaging characteristics of EAOC until now. We assessed MRI characteristics in differentiating EAOC and non-EAOC. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed clinical and MRI characteristics from 54 patients with 67 lesions diagnosed with primary epithelial ovarian carcinoma at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between January 2012 and October 2020. We studied MRI findings such as maximum diameter, morphology, configuration, locularity, features of mural nodules, lymphadenopathy, peritoneal implants, the presence of hyperintensity on T1WI, and hypointensity on T2WI. We also studied the clinical characteristics. Significant MRI variables in univariate analysis were selected for subsequent multivariate regression analysis. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the significant MRI variables in univariate analysis. RESULTS We found that the patients with EAOC, compared with those with non-EAOC, were younger, more unilateral, and had earlier FIGO stage. Univariate analysis revealed that morphology, locularity, growth pattern of mural nodules, and hypointensity on T2WI were factors that significantly differed between EAOC and non-EAOC. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, locularity and hypointensity on T2WI were independent predictors to distinguish EAOC from non-EAOC. CONCLUSIONS EAOC typically presented as a unilocular mass with hypointensity on T2WI in cystic components. MRI could help distinguish EAOC from non-EAOC. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE MRI is a promising tool for preoperative diagnosis of EAOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ximing Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Min Li
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhuopeng Tang
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinyi Li
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ting Song
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|