Type II Odontoid Fracture: a case series highlighting the treatment strategies

Preoperative cervical traction with Gardner-Wells tongs: who profits most?

BACKGROUND

Preoperative traction with the Gardner-Wells tongs (PTGWT) is a valuable option for cervical spine injuries with malalignment. The aim of this study was to analyze the factors related to the treatment success of PTGWT.

METHODS

All consecutive cases with PTGWT due to cervical spine injury with malalignment treated between 01/2010 and 09/2020 were included. Patients' records were reviewed for demographic and clinical characteristics. Treatment success was evaluated upon the angle correction in the sagittal plane using the computed tomography scans before and after the treatment.

RESULTS

Of 20 patients in the final analysis (median age: 77.5 years; 12 females [60%]), 14 individuals were treated for the type-II odontoid fracture, and six cases presented with subluxation fractures between C3 and C7. After PTGWT and subsequent intraoperative reposition, there was an improvement of the median deviation angle from initial 32° to 5.5°. PTGWT resulted in a significant improvement of the median deviation angle for the odontoid (17°, P<0.0001), but not for the subluxation (4°, P=0.10) fractures. The time interval between trauma and PTGWT was associated with the treatment success of subluxation (P=0.051) but not of odontoid (P=0.87) fractures. Older individuals aged ≥51 years showed better reposition results with PTGWT (17° vs. 7.5°, P=0.02). There were no PTGWT-related complications in the cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

PTGWT is an effective and safe treatment for cervical spine injuries with malalignment. The patients with odontoid fractures might particularly profit from the PTGWT. Treatment delay seems more relevant for PTGWT success in subluxation than in odontoid fractures.

Surgery Decreases Nonunion, Myelopathy, and Mortality for Patients With Traumatic Odontoid Fractures: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Existing literature suggests that surgical intervention for odontoid fractures is beneficial but often does not control for known confounding factors.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of surgical fixation on myelopathy, fracture nonunion, and mortality after traumatic odontoid fractures.

METHODS

We analyzed all traumatic odontoid fractures managed at our institution between 2010 and 2020. Ordinal multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with myelopathy severity at follow-up. Propensity score analysis was used to test the treatment effect of surgery on nonunion and mortality.

RESULTS

Three hundred and three patients with traumatic odontoid fracture were identified, of whom 21.6% underwent surgical stabilization. After propensity score matching, populations were well balanced across all analyses (Rubin's B < 25.0, 0.5 < Rubin's R < 2.0). Controlling for age and fracture angulation, type, comminution, and displacement, the overall rate of nonunion was lower in the surgical group (39.7% vs 57.3%, average treatment effect [ATE] = -0.153 [-0.279, -0.028], P = .017). Controlling for age, sex, Nurick score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Injury Severity Score, and selection for intensive care unit admission, the mortality rate was lower for the surgical group at 30 days (1.7% vs 13.8%, ATE = -0.101 [-0.172, -0.030], P = .005) and at 1 year was 7.0% vs 23.7%, ATE = -0.099 [-0.181, -0.017], P = .018. Cox proportional hazards analysis also demonstrated a mortality benefit for surgery (hazard ratio = 0.587 [0.426, 0.799], P = .0009). Patients who underwent surgery were less likely to have worse myelopathy scores at follow-up (odds ratio = 0.48 [0.25, 0.93], P = .029).

CONCLUSION

Surgical stabilization is associated with better myelopathy scores at follow-up and causes lower rates of fracture nonunion, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality.

A new tool in percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation for odontoid fractures remains challenging due to the complex anatomy of the craniocervical junction. We designed a new guide instrument to help with the placement of guide wire, which have achieved satisfying surgical results. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this new tool in percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with odontoid fracture were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation with the traditional guide instrument (n = 13) or the new guide instrument we designed (n = 16). The following clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups: operation time, radiograph times, incision length, blood loss, postoperative hospitalization, postoperative complications, bony union, fixation failure, and reoperation. Radiographs or CT scans were performed at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in preoperative demographic data between the two groups. The operation time (56.62 ± 8.32 Vs 49.63 ± 7.47, P = 0.025) and radiograph times (26.54 ± 6.94 Vs 20.50 ± 5.02, P = 0.011) of the designed guide instrument group were significantly lower than those of the traditional guide instrument group. There were no significant differences in incision length (16.08 ± 3.07 Vs 15.69 ± 2.73, P = 0.720), blood loss (16.08 ± 4.96 Vs 17.88 ± 5.98, P = 0.393), postoperative hospitalization (7.15 ± 1.91 Vs 6.88 ± 2.36, P = 0.734), postoperative complications (7.7% Vs 12.5%, P = 1), and bony union (92.3% Vs 93.8%, P = 1) between the two groups. No fixation failure or reoperation occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The top of our designed guide instrument is a wedge-shaped tip with 30° inclination, which has a large contact area with the anterior surface of the cervical vertebra. According to our retrospective study, the guide instrument can reduce the operation time and radiograph times. It has potential clinical value, which needs further testing with a higher level of research design.