1
|
Buenache N, Sánchez-delaCruz A, Cuenca I, Giménez A, Moreno L, Martínez-López J, Rosa-Rosa JM. Identification of Immunoglobulin Gene Rearrangement Biomarkers in Multiple Myeloma through cfDNA-Based Liquid Biopsy Using tchDNA-Seq. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15112911. [PMID: 37296872 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy characterized by the clonal proliferation of pathogenic CD138+ plasma cells (PPCs) in bone marrow (BM). Recent years have seen a significant increase in the treatment options for MM; however, most patients who achieve complete the response ultimately relapse. The earlier detection of tumor-related clonal DNA would thus be very beneficial for patients with MM and would enable timely therapeutic interventions to improve outcomes. Liquid biopsy of "cell-free DNA" (cfDNA) as a minimally invasive approach might be more effective than BM aspiration not only for the diagnosis but also for the detection of early recurrence. Most studies thus far have addressed the comparative quantification of patient-specific biomarkers in cfDNA with PPCs and BM samples, which have shown good correlations. However, there are limitations to this approach, such as the difficulty in obtaining enough circulating free tumor DNA to achieve sufficient sensitivity for the assessment of minimal residual disease. Herein, we summarize current data on methodologies to characterize MM, and we present evidence that targeted capture hybridization DNA sequencing (tchDNA-Seq) can provide robust biomarkers in cfDNA, including immunoglobulin (IG) rearrangements. We also show that detection can be improved by prior purification of the cfDNA. Overall, liquid biopsies of cfDNA to monitor IG rearrangements have the potential to provide important diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive information in patients with MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Buenache
- Department of Translational Haematology, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12) Haematological Tumors Clinical Research Unit H12O-CNIO, 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrea Sánchez-delaCruz
- Department of Translational Haematology, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12) Haematological Tumors Clinical Research Unit H12O-CNIO, 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Cuenca
- Department of Translational Haematology, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12) Haematological Tumors Clinical Research Unit H12O-CNIO, 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Alicia Giménez
- Department of Translational Haematology, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12) Haematological Tumors Clinical Research Unit H12O-CNIO, 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Moreno
- Department of Translational Haematology, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12) Haematological Tumors Clinical Research Unit H12O-CNIO, 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Joaquín Martínez-López
- Department of Translational Haematology, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12) Haematological Tumors Clinical Research Unit H12O-CNIO, 28041 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Translational Haematology, Haematology Service, Hospital 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Manuel Rosa-Rosa
- Department of Translational Haematology, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12) Haematological Tumors Clinical Research Unit H12O-CNIO, 28041 Madrid, Spain
- Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), 28034 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ferla V, Antonini E, Perini T, Farina F, Masottini S, Malato S, Marktel S, Lupo Stanghellini MT, Tresoldi C, Ciceri F, Marcatti M. Minimal residual disease detection by next-generation sequencing in multiple myeloma: Promise and challenges for response-adapted therapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:932852. [PMID: 36052251 PMCID: PMC9426755 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.932852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) is becoming a standard diagnostic tool for curable hematological malignancies such as chronic and acute myeloid leukemia. Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease, as a major portion of patients even in complete response eventually relapse, suggesting that residual disease remains. Over the past decade, the treatment landscape of MM has radically changed with the introduction of new effective drugs and the availability of immunotherapy, including targeted antibodies and adoptive cell therapy. Therefore, conventional serological and morphological techniques have become suboptimal for the evaluation of depth of response. Recently, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) introduced the definition of MRD negativity as the absence of clonal Plasma cells (PC) with a minimum sensitivity of <10−5 either by next-generation sequencing (NGS) using the LymphoSIGHT platform (Sequenta/Adaptative) or by next-generation flow cytometry (NGF) using EuroFlow approaches as the reference methods. While the definition of the LymphoSIGHT platform (Sequenta/Adaptive) as the standard method derives from its large use and validation in clinical studies on the prognostic value of NGS-based MRD, other commercially available options exist. Recently, the LymphoTrack assay has been evaluated in MM, demonstrating a sensitivity level of 10−5, hence qualifying as an alternative effective tool for MRD monitoring in MM. Here, we will review state-of-the-art methods for MRD assessment by NGS. We will summarize how MRD testing supports clinical trials as a useful tool in dynamic risk-adapted therapy. Finally, we will also discuss future promise and challenges of NGS-based MRD determination for clinical decision-making. In addition, we will present our real-life single-center experience with the commercially available NGS strategy LymphoTrack-MiSeq. Even with the limitation of a limited number of patients, our results confirm the LymphoTrack-MiSeq platform as a cost-effective, readily available, and standardized workflow with a sensitivity of 10−5. Our real-life data also confirm that achieving MRD negativity is an important prognostic factor in MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Ferla
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- *Correspondence: Valeria Ferla,
| | - Elena Antonini
- Molecular Hematology Laboratory, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Perini
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Age Related Diseases Laboratory, Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Farina
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Serena Masottini
- Molecular Hematology Laboratory, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Simona Malato
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Sarah Marktel
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Cristina Tresoldi
- Molecular Hematology Laboratory, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Ciceri
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Magda Marcatti
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gozzetti A, Ciofini S, Sicuranza A, Pacelli P, Raspadori D, Cencini E, Tocci D, Bocchia M. Drug resistance and minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma. CANCER DRUG RESISTANCE (ALHAMBRA, CALIF.) 2022; 5:171-183. [PMID: 35582527 PMCID: PMC8992600 DOI: 10.20517/cdr.2021.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Great progress has been made in improving survival in multiple myeloma (MM) patients over the last 30 years. New drugs have been introduced and complete responses are frequently seen. However, the majority of MM patients do experience a relapse at a variable time after treatment, and ultimately the disease becomes drug-resistant following therapies. Recently, minimal residual disease (MRD) detection has been introduced in clinical trials utilizing novel therapeutic agents to measure the depth of response. MRD can be considered as a surrogate for both progression-free and overall survival. In this perspective, the persistence of a residual therapy-resistant myeloma plasma cell clone can be associated with inferior survivals. The present review gives an overview of drug resistance in MM, i.e., mutation of β5 subunit of the proteasome; upregulation of pumps of efflux; heat shock protein induction for proteasome inhibitors; downregulation of CRBN expression; deregulation of IRF4 expression; mutation of CRBN, IKZF1, and IKZF3 for immunomodulatory drugs and decreased target expression; complement protein increase; sBCMA increase; and BCMA down expression for monoclonal antibodies. Multicolor flow cytometry, or next-generation flow, and next-generation sequencing are currently the techniques available to measure MRD with sensitivity at 10-5. Sustained MRD negativity is related to prolonged survival, and it is evaluated in all recent clinical trials as a surrogate of drug efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Gozzetti
- Hematology, University of Siena, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena 53100, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Anderson KC, Auclair D, Adam SJ, Agarwal A, Anderson M, Avet-Loiseau H, Bustoros M, Chapman J, Connors DE, Dash A, Di Bacco A, Du L, Facon T, Flores-Montero J, Gay F, Ghobrial IM, Gormley NJ, Gupta I, Higley H, Hillengass J, Kanapuru B, Kazandjian D, Kelloff GJ, Kirsch IR, Kremer B, Landgren O, Lightbody E, Lomas OC, Lonial S, Mateos MV, Montes de Oca R, Mukundan L, Munshi NC, O'Donnell EK, Orfao A, Paiva B, Patel R, Pugh TJ, Ramasamy K, Ray J, Roshal M, Ross JA, Sigman CC, Thoren KL, Trudel S, Ulaner G, Valente N, Weiss BM, Zamagni E, Kumar SK. Minimal Residual Disease in Myeloma: Application for Clinical Care and New Drug Registration. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:5195-5212. [PMID: 34321279 PMCID: PMC9662886 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-1059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The development of novel agents has transformed the treatment paradigm for multiple myeloma, with minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity now achievable across the entire disease spectrum. Bone marrow-based technologies to assess MRD, including approaches using next-generation flow and next-generation sequencing, have provided real-time clinical tools for the sensitive detection and monitoring of MRD in patients with multiple myeloma. Complementary liquid biopsy-based assays are now quickly progressing with some, such as mass spectrometry methods, being very close to clinical use, while others utilizing nucleic acid-based technologies are still developing and will prove important to further our understanding of the biology of MRD. On the regulatory front, multiple retrospective individual patient and clinical trial level meta-analyses have already shown and will continue to assess the potential of MRD as a surrogate for patient outcome. Given all this progress, it is not surprising that a number of clinicians are now considering using MRD to inform real-world clinical care of patients across the spectrum from smoldering myeloma to relapsed refractory multiple myeloma, with each disease setting presenting key challenges and questions that will need to be addressed through clinical trials. The pace of advances in targeted and immune therapies in multiple myeloma is unprecedented, and novel MRD-driven biomarker strategies are essential to accelerate innovative clinical trials leading to regulatory approval of novel treatments and continued improvement in patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth C. Anderson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel Auclair
- Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, Norwalk, Connecticut.,Corresponding Author: Daniel Auclair, Research, Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, 383 Main Street, Norwalk, CT, 06851. E-mail:
| | - Stacey J. Adam
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, North Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Amit Agarwal
- US Medical Oncology, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Summit, New Jersey
| | | | - Hervé Avet-Loiseau
- Laboratoire d'Hématologie, Pôle Biologie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Mark Bustoros
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cornell University/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | | | - Dana E. Connors
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, North Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ajeeta Dash
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | - Ling Du
- GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| | - Thierry Facon
- Department of Hematology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Juan Flores-Montero
- Cancer Research Center (IBMCC-CSIC/USAL-IBSAL); Cytometry Service (NUCLEUS) and Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Francesca Gay
- Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero Università Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - Irene M. Ghobrial
- Preventative Cancer Therapies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nicole J. Gormley
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies 2, Office of Oncologic Disease, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Ira Gupta
- GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Jens Hillengass
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Bindu Kanapuru
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies 2, Office of Oncologic Disease, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Dickran Kazandjian
- Myeloma Program, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Gary J. Kelloff
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, NIH, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Ilan R. Kirsch
- Translational Medicine, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Ola Landgren
- Myeloma Program, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Elizabeth Lightbody
- Preventative Cancer Therapies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Oliver C. Lomas
- Preventative Cancer Therapies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sagar Lonial
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology at Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | | | - Nikhil C. Munshi
- Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Alberto Orfao
- Cancer Research Center (IBMCC-CSIC/USAL-IBSAL); Cytometry Service (NUCLEUS) and Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Bruno Paiva
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Reshma Patel
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania
| | - Trevor J. Pugh
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karthik Ramasamy
- Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jill Ray
- BioOncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Mikhail Roshal
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jeremy A. Ross
- Precision Medicine, Oncology, AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | - Suzanne Trudel
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Nancy Valente
- BioOncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | | | - Elena Zamagni
- Seragnoli Institute of Hematology, Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy
| | - Shaji K. Kumar
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hu-Lieskovan S, Bhaumik S, Dhodapkar K, Grivel JCJB, Gupta S, Hanks BA, Janetzki S, Kleen TO, Koguchi Y, Lund AW, Maccalli C, Mahnke YD, Novosiadly RD, Selvan SR, Sims T, Zhao Y, Maecker HT. SITC cancer immunotherapy resource document: a compass in the land of biomarker discovery. J Immunother Cancer 2020; 8:e000705. [PMID: 33268350 PMCID: PMC7713206 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the publication of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer's (SITC) original cancer immunotherapy biomarkers resource document, there have been remarkable breakthroughs in cancer immunotherapy, in particular the development and approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors, engineered cellular therapies, and tumor vaccines to unleash antitumor immune activity. The most notable feature of these breakthroughs is the achievement of durable clinical responses in some patients, enabling long-term survival. These durable responses have been noted in tumor types that were not previously considered immunotherapy-sensitive, suggesting that all patients with cancer may have the potential to benefit from immunotherapy. However, a persistent challenge in the field is the fact that only a minority of patients respond to immunotherapy, especially those therapies that rely on endogenous immune activation such as checkpoint inhibitors and vaccination due to the complex and heterogeneous immune escape mechanisms which can develop in each patient. Therefore, the development of robust biomarkers for each immunotherapy strategy, enabling rational patient selection and the design of precise combination therapies, is key for the continued success and improvement of immunotherapy. In this document, we summarize and update established biomarkers, guidelines, and regulatory considerations for clinical immune biomarker development, discuss well-known and novel technologies for biomarker discovery and validation, and provide tools and resources that can be used by the biomarker research community to facilitate the continued development of immuno-oncology and aid in the goal of durable responses in all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siwen Hu-Lieskovan
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Kavita Dhodapkar
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Sumati Gupta
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Brent A Hanks
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | - Yoshinobu Koguchi
- Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Amanda W Lund
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Tasha Sims
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Tarrytown, New York, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee LX, Li SC. Hunting down the dominating subclone of cancer stem cells as a potential new therapeutic target in multiple myeloma: An artificial intelligence perspective. World J Stem Cells 2020; 12:706-720. [PMID: 32952853 PMCID: PMC7477658 DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v12.i8.706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of single-cell subclones, which can rapidly switch from dormant to dominant subclones, occur in the natural pathophysiology of multiple myeloma (MM) but is often "pressed" by the standard treatment of MM. These emerging subclones present a challenge, providing reservoirs for chemoresistant mutations. Technological advancement is required to track MM subclonal changes, as understanding MM's mechanism of evolution at the cellular level can prompt the development of new targeted ways of treating this disease. Current methods to study the evolution of subclones in MM rely on technologies capable of phenotypically and genotypically characterizing plasma cells, which include immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, or cytogenetics. Still, all of these technologies may be limited by the sensitivity for picking up rare events. In contrast, more incisive methods such as RNA sequencing, comparative genomic hybridization, or whole-genome sequencing are not yet commonly used in clinical practice. Here we introduce the epidemiological diagnosis and prognosis of MM and review current methods for evaluating MM subclone evolution, such as minimal residual disease/multiparametric flow cytometry/next-generation sequencing, and their respective advantages and disadvantages. In addition, we propose our new single-cell method of evaluation to understand MM's mechanism of evolution at the molecular and cellular level and to prompt the development of new targeted ways of treating this disease, which has a broad prospect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa X Lee
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCI Health, Orange, CA 92868, United States
| | - Shengwen Calvin Li
- Neuro-oncology and Stem Cell Research Laboratory, CHOC Children's Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA 92868, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of California-Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA 92868, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Othus M, Gale RP, Hourigan CS, Walter RB. Statistics and measurable residual disease (MRD) testing: uses and abuses in hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2020; 55:843-850. [PMID: 31666655 PMCID: PMC7462748 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-019-0729-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2019] [Revised: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
SERIES EDITORS' NOTE The decision whether to recommend a transplant to someone with acute leukemia in first remission is complex and challenging. Diverse, often confounded co-variates interact to influence one's recommendation. Briefly, the decision metric can be viewed in three spheres: (1) subject-; (2) transplant-; and (3) disease-related co-variates. Subject-related co-variates include items such as age and comorbidities. Transplant-related co-variates include items such as donor-types, graft source, proposed conditioning and pre- and post-transplant immune suppression.But what of disease-related variables? Previously haematologists relied on co-variates such as WBC at diagnosis, chemotherapy cycles to achieve first remission, cytogenetics and most recently, mutation topography. However, these co-variates have largely been replaced by results of measurable residual disease (MRD)-testing. Many chemotherapy-only and transplant studies report strong correlations between results of MRD-testing on therapy outcomes such as cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), leukemia-free survival (LFS) or survival. (CIR makes biological sense in a transplant context whereas LFS and survival do not give competing causes of death such as transplant-related mortality (TRM), graft-versus-host disease and interstitial pneumonia unrelated to relapse probability).This raises the question of how useful results are of MRD-testing in predicting CIR after transplants. Elsewhere we discussed accuracy and precision of MRD-testing in predicting outcomes of therapy of acute myeloid leukemia (Estey E, Gale RP. Leukemia 31:1255-1258, 2017; Hourigan CS, Gale RP, Gormley NJ, Ossenkoppele GJ, Walter RB. Leukemia 31:1482-1490, 2017). Briefly put, not terribly good. Although results of MRD-testing are often the most powerful predictor of CIR in multivariable analyses, the C-statistic (a measure of prediction accuracy) is often only about 0.75. This is much better than flipping a fair coin but far from ideal.In the typescript which follows, Othus and colleagues discuss statistical issues underlying MRD-testing in the context of haematopoietic cell transplants. We hope readers, especially haematologists who often need to make transplant recommendations to people with acute leukemia in first remission, will read it carefully and critically. The bottom line is MRD-test data are useful but considerable uncertainty is unavoidable with substantial false-positive and -negative rates. We need to acknowledge this uncertainty to ourselves and to the people we counsel. The authors quote Voltaire who said: Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is an absurd one. Sadly so, but we do the best we can. Robert Peter Gale, Imperial College London, and Mei-Jie Zhang, Medical College of Wisconsin and CIBMTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Othus
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Robert Peter Gale
- Haematology Research Centre, Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Christopher S Hourigan
- Myeloid Malignancies Section, Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Roland B Walter
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang G, Ning FY, Wang JH, Yan HM, Kong HW, Zhang YT, Shen Q. Expression of interleukin-32 in bone marrow of patients with myeloma and its prognostic significance. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7:4234-4244. [PMID: 31911904 PMCID: PMC6940335 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i24.4234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2019] [Revised: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The guiding effect of prognostic stratification in multiple myeloma (MM) for treatment has been increasingly emphasized in recent years. The stratification of risk factors based on the International Staging System (ISS), Durie-Salmon (DS) staging and related indicators is affected by the renal function of patients, resulting in poor performance. This study assesses the relationship between interleukin-32 (IL-32) and related risk factors in 67 patients with MM and their clinical outcomes.
AIM To investigate the feasibility of IL-32 in evaluating prognosis in patients with MM and the factors influencing prognosis.
METHODS This was a pragmatic, prospective observational study of patients with MM at a single center. According to IL-32 level, patients were divided into two groups. The variables under consideration included age, blood β2-microglobulin, albumin, C-reactive protein, serum calcium, serum creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase, M protein type, ISS stage, DS stage, and IL-32 levels and minimal residual disease (MRD) after induction treatment. The main outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS IL-32 was an important factor affecting PFS and OS in patients with MM. Compared with patients with IL-32 levels ≥ 856.4 pg/mL, patients with IL-32 levels < 856.4 pg/mL had longer PFS (P = 0.0387) and OS (P = 0.0379); Univariate analysis showed that IL-32 level and MRD were significantly associated with OS and PFS (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that IL-32 levels ≥ 856.4 pg/mL and MRD positive were still independent risk factors for OS and PFS (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION IL-32 is valuable for assessing the prognosis of MM patients. IL-32 level combined with MRD may be a useful routine evaluation index for MM patients after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gang Wang
- Department of Hematology, Quzhou People’s Hospital, Quzhou 324000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Fang-Ying Ning
- Department of Hematology, People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jia-Heng Wang
- Department of Hematology, Quzhou People’s Hospital, Quzhou 324000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Hai-Meng Yan
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Hong-Wei Kong
- Department of Hematology, Quzhou People’s Hospital, Quzhou 324000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yu-Ting Zhang
- Adicon Clinical Laboratories Inc., Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Qiang Shen
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ouyang D, Li Y, He W, Lin W, Hu L, Wang C, Xu L, Park J, You L. Mechanical segregation and capturing of clonal circulating plasma cells in multiple myeloma using micropillar-integrated microfluidic device. BIOMICROFLUIDICS 2019; 13:064114. [PMID: 31768200 PMCID: PMC6863761 DOI: 10.1063/1.5112050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Revised: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM), the disorder of plasma cells, is the second most common type of hematological cancer and is responsible for approximately 20% of deaths from hematological malignancies. The current gold standard for MM diagnosis includes invasive bone marrow aspiration. However, it lacks the sensitivity to detect minimal residual disease, and the nonuniform distribution of clonal plasma cells (CPCs) within bone marrow also often results in inaccurate reporting. Serum and urine assessment of monoclonal proteins, such as Kappa light chains, is another commonly used approach for MM diagnosis. Although it is noninvasive, the level of paraprotein elevation is still too low for detecting minimal residual disease and nonsecretive MM. Circulating CPCs (cCPCs) have been reported to be present in the peripheral blood of MM patients, and high levels of cCPCs were shown to correlate with poor survival. This suggests a potential noninvasive approach for MM disease progress monitoring and prognosis. In this study, we developed a mechanical property-based microfluidic platform to capture cCPCs. Using human myeloma cancer cell lines spiked in healthy donor blood, the microfluidic platform demonstrates high enrichment ratio (>500) and sufficient capture efficiency (40%-55%). Patient samples were also assessed to investigate the diagnostic potential of cCPCs for MM by correlating with the levels of Kappa light chains in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongfang Ouyang
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G8, Canada
| | - Yonghua Li
- Department of Hematology, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, PLA, Guangzhou 510010, China
| | - Wenqi He
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
| | - Weicong Lin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
| | - Lina Hu
- Department of Hematology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen 518020, China
| | - Chen Wang
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - Liangcheng Xu
- Institute of Biomaterials & Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G9, Canada
| | - Jaewon Park
- Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed:, Tel.: +1 416-978-5736 and , Tel.: +86 755-8801-8574
| | - Lidan You
- Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed:, Tel.: +1 416-978-5736 and , Tel.: +86 755-8801-8574
| |
Collapse
|