Ureteral Strictures

Current status of minimally invasive endoscopic management of ureteric strictures

Endourological techniques are used more often nowadays in the treatment of ureteric strictures of various etiologies. Advances in technology have provided new tools to the armamentarium of the endoscopic urological surgeon. Numerous studies exist that investigate the efficiency and safety of each of the therapeutic modalities available. In this review, we attempt to demonstrate the available and contemporary evidence supporting each minimally invasive modality in the management of ureteric strictures.

Ureteroscopic endoureterotomy

OBJECTIVE

To highlight the current status of ureteroscopic endoureterotomy (UE) by reporting extensive experience with the endoscopic management of ureteric strictures, with special emphasis on factors determining success, and by reviewing publications on the minimally invasive management of ureteric strictures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study comprised 50 patients (mean age 53 years, range 18-85, equal sex distribution) with ureteric strictures of varying causes; all had their stricture treated endoscopically. The follow-up was 0.5-9 years; 10 patients with recurrent strictures had two ipsilateral stents placed to try to improve the outcome, and eight patients with completely obliterating strictures were treated by ureteroscopic re-canalization.

RESULTS

The site of stricture had no bearing on the eventual outcome. Patients with uretero-enteric and malignant strictures did not fare so well. The most important predictor of failure was the length of the stricture, with failure in all seven patients with strictures of > 2 cm. In the 10 patients treated with two ipsilateral stents, eight were successful, which was very promising considering that these patients had recalcitrant strictures and placing one stent had previously failed. The overall success rate was 74%.

CONCLUSION

UE has become the procedure of choice for the initial management of ureteric strictures. Simple balloon dilatation is also effective in certain situations. The characteristics of the stricture often govern the eventual outcome. In properly selected cases success rates of approximately 75% can be expected.

Endourologic management of benign ureteral strictures with and without compromised vascular supply

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively assess the efficacy of balloon dilation, endopyelotomy/ureterotomy, and stenting alone in the management of benign ureteral strictures with intact or compromised vascular supply.

METHODS

One hundred fourteen patients with benign ureteral strictures were assessed after at least a 2-year follow-up (range 2 to 16 years, mean 6.3). Balloon dilation was performed in 81, endopyelotomy/ureterotomy with temporary stenting in 27, and ureteral stenting alone in 6 patients. Ureteral strictures were divided into strictures with intact or with compromised vascular supply.

RESULTS

Balloon dilation was successful in short ureteral strictures with intact vascular supply in 33 of 37 (89.2%), but only in 3 of 8 (37.5%) long ureteral strictures and in 1 of 2 (50%) recurrent ureteropelvic junction strictures. Balloon dilation was less successful when the vascular supply was compromised in 2 (40%) of 5 short strictures, 1 (16.7%) of 6 long strictures, and 2 (33.3%) of 6 recurrent ureteropelvic junction strictures. Endopyelotomy/ureterotomy was successful in 17 (89.5%) of 19 strictures with compromised vascular supply.

CONCLUSIONS

Balloon dilation is recommended for management of short strictures with intact vascular supply. Endoureterotomy with stenting is recommended for all long ureteral strictures, for ureteropelvic junction stenoses, and for short ureteral strictures with compromised vascular supply and benign underlying etiology.