Dichoptic interaction of harmonically related spatial and temporal frequencies

Tonic interocular suppression and binocular summation in human vision

1. Spatial sensitivity of human foveal vision was examined using sinusoidally modulated gratings. Our primary concern was the influence of interocular light adaptation upon monocular visibility. 2. Interocular adapting influences depend upon spatial frequency and adapting luminance. Interocular adaptation has a negligible influence upon the sensitivity to 1 cycle/deg gratings. Any visible interocular adapting field improves the sensitivity to intermediate spatial frequencies (2-5 cycles/deg). 3. Brighter interocular backgrounds (greater than 0.1 cd/m2) improve sensitivity to higher spatial frequencies (10-20 cycles/deg). 4. The interocular adapting influences summarized in (2) and (3) above cannot be duplicated by monocular or binocular adaptation. Similarly, monocular or binocular adaptation have negligible influences upon binocular visibility. 5. The interocular adapting effect summarized in (3) above can be duplicated by pressure blinding the contralateral eye. We conclude that monocular spatial sensitivity is subject to a tonic interocular suppression (TIS) from the dark-adapted eye. 6. The spatial sensitivity resulting from binocular viewing is nearly identical to that observed by combining monocular viewing with interocular light adaptation. We suggest that the improvement in sensitivity resulting from two-eyed viewing may be attributable to the removal of TIS instead of to binocular physiological summation.

Spatial frequency interference on grating-induction

Spatial frequency interference and facilitation in suprathreshold vision were studied using the grating-induction effect [McCourt, Vision Res. 22, 119-134 (1982)] as a sensitive probe. The effects on grating-induction magnitude produced by variations in "interfering" and "inducing" grating spatial frequency, contrast and phase were examined in four experiments. A limited range of high spatial frequency interfering gratings reduced the contrast of gratings induced by spatially coextensive lower frequency inducing gratings. Both phase-dependent and phase-independent interference was observed. Facilitation of grating-induction was produced by interfering gratings of lower frequency than the inducing grating. It is hypothesized that the grating-induction interference effect is due to inhibition of the low spatial frequency selective mechanisms responsible for induction, by channels tuned to higher frequencies. The functional significance of induction and spatial frequency inhibition is discussed, and a mathematical description of the results is presented.