Computerized perimetry: possibilities for individual adaptation and feedback

High-pass resolution perimetry. A clinical review

Review of all available reports comparing high-pass resolution perimetry (HRP) and conventional perimetry in normals and in subjects with different visual disorders reveals closely comparable aspects of sensitivity, specificity, and reliability. HRP shows important advantages concerning variability, test duration, and subject preferences. Drawbacks seem largely limited to somewhat loose renditions of visual field defects of small area and large depth. Otherwise HRP's novel format of graphic result presentation may be better suited to visual evaluation than conventional gray-scale maps with their lumping of thresholds and extensive interpolations. Several examples are provided of visual field defects due to various lesions throughout the visual system.

A primer of ophthalmic computer graphics

Computer graphics offers an unprecedented opportunity to probe new and old ideas in vision testing, without going to the expense of building dedicated equipment. However, the large variety of computer hardware is bewildering and only occasionally can commercial software tools be used. This mini review of the basic principles of computer graphics on personal computers is intended to help the newcomer to the field.

Acuity perimetry: estimation of neural channels

Measurements of peripheral visual acuity allow quantitative estimations of retino-cortical neural channels. Analysis of results from high-pass resolution perimetry revealed that about 2/3 of all channels are contained within 30 degrees of visual field eccentricity and that loss of 1/3 raises the average threshold level about 1 decibel. The analytical procedure can be applied to any type of visual field defect.