Host specificity of DNA in Haemophilus influenzae: the two restriction and modification systems in strain Ra

Purification and properties of a new restriction endonuclease from Haemophilus influenzae Rf

Haemophilus influenzae Rf 232, showing the phenomena of restriction and modification, contains an endonuclease that inactivates in vitro the biological activity of DNAs lacking the strain-specific modification. This specific restriction endonuclease has been purified to near homogeneity by a procedure that includes DNA-agarose chromatography. This highly purified enzyme requires ATP and Mg2+ for activity and is stimulated by S-adenosylmethionine. The enzyme seems to cleave DNA at well-defined sites, since it produces a specific pattern of bands upon agarose gel electrophoresis. The enzyme has no ATPase activity. A methylase activity is observed in the course of the endonucleolytic reaction, which probably protects some of the DNA sites from cleavage.

Biological characteristics of a type I restriction-modification system in Staphylococcus aureus

Two restriction-modification systems, S1 and S2, are present in Staphylococcus aureus RN450 (S. Iordanescu and M. Surdeanu, J. Gen. Microbiol., 96:277-281, 1976). System S2 affects phage multiplication after both infection and transfection. Unmodified plasmid and chromosomal DNAs are also not expressed following transduction and transformation into a restrictive host. Restricted phages are, however, capable of conferring phage-mediated competence, although the state of competence does not affect the restriction-modification system. The restricting activity of system S2 is inactivated by heat treatment of the cells. An enzymatic activity that restricts unmodified phage DNA in the presence of ATP, Mg2+, and S-adenosylmethionine was recovered from cell-free extracts of a strain RN450 derivative.

On the nature of nontypable Haemophilus influenzae

193 Haemophilus cultures, including 71 nontypable H. influenzae isolates, were examined with respect to phage HP1 sensitivity, lysogeny for this and for other phages and for excretion of bacteriocins. Fifty of the 71 nontypable cultures were sensitive to phage HP1 but only three produced plaques. The other 47 isolates were thus probably not non-encapsulated derivatives of H. influenzae serotypes a, b, d, and e, which have discrete and characteristic phage HP1 restriction and modification systems, or serotype c which appears to be restriction negative. They could be derivatives of serotype f which does not give plaques with phage HP1. The nontypable three cultures that plated phage HP1 efficiently could be non-encapsulated serotype c derivatives. Fourteen of the phage HP1 insentitive non-typable cultures were found to be defectively lysogenic for this phage. Five of these were genetically transformed to wild type lysogens. Their phage produced plaques efficiently only on Rc strains and on a restriction-negative mutant of serotype d. These lysogenic nontypable isolates are thus modification (and restriction) negative and they are thus probably not nonencapsulated derivatives of serotypes a, b, d, e, or f. Fifty three of 56 serotype b cultures were found to excrete a bacteriocin, to which all other nonproducing Haemophilus cultures were more or less sensitive. The three restriction-negative nontypable H. influenzae cultures also excreted this bacteriocin but the other cultures listed did not do this. The tentative conclusion from this study is that nontypable H. influenzae isolates are probably not derivatives of the six known encapsulated strains.

Inhibition of transformation and transfection in Haemophilus influenzae Rd9 by lysogeny

Haemophilus influenzae Rd9 lysogenic for temperate bacteriophage N3 was found to be virtually nontransformable and nontransfectable. This inhibition of transformation and transfection was due partly to the decreased capacity of competent lysogenic cells for irreversible binding of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and partly to some events taking place after adsorption of the DNA. The unadsorbed DNA was not degraded by the competent lysogenic cells.

Restriction enzymes do not play a significant role in Haemophilus homospecific or heterospecific transformation

Competent Haemophilus influenzae Rd recipients, either as phage HP1 restricting (r+) or nonrestricting (r-) nonlysogens or defective lysogens, were exposed to deoxyribonucleic acids from various wild-type phage HP1 lysogenic H. influenzae serotype strains (non-encapsulated derivatives of serotypes a,b, c, d, and e), to DNA from lysogenic Haemophilus parahaemolyticus, and to DNA from modified and nonmodified phage HP1. Transformation of antibiotic resistance markers and of prophage markers in homospecific crosses was observed to be unaffected by the recipient restriction phenotype, whereas the transfection response was much reduced in r+ recipients. Heterospecific transformation of prophage markers was reduced by only 80 to 90%, whereas antibiotic resistance marker transformation was 1,000 to 10,000 times lower. Heterspecific transfection was at least 100 times lower than homospecific transfection in both r+ and r- recipients. The general conclusion is that neither class I nor class II restriction enzymes affect significantly the transformation efficiency in homospecific and heterospecific crosses. The efficiency of heterospecific transformation may depend mainly on the deoxyribonucleic acid homology in the genetic marker region.

Deoxyribonucleic acid modification by intermediate-type modification mutants of Escherichia coli K-12 and B

The modification of bacteriophages grown on r-m+/- restriction and modification mutants of Escherichia coli K-12 or B appears to be related to the number of restriction-specific sites in the viral genome. Bacteriophage fd and its mutant U1 fd, which carry two and one B-specific sites, respectively, are not modified in vivo by rB-mB+/- mutant strains. In vitro treatment of fd RF-B+/- deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or U1 fd RF-B+/- DNA by endo R-Eco B results in cleavage of the substrate DNA. Lambda bacteriophage, after growth in r-m+/- mutant host strains (lambda-K+/- or lambda-B+/-), is partially protected from in vivo degradation by wild-type homospecific strains. Its efficiency of plating on these strains is approximately 10(-2). However, a hybrid phi80-lambda phage which carries only one K-specific site (sklambda-1) is not modified by rK-mK+/- strains. Labeled DNAs from lambda-B+/- and lambda-K+/- phages were used as substrates for endo R-Eco B and endo R-Eco K nucleases. Zonal centrifugation analysis of the products of the reactions indicate that rK-mK+/- mutants do not protect lambda DNA from in vitro degradation by endo R-Eco K. In contrast, rB-mB+/- mutants appear to partially protect lambda DNA from attack by endo R-Eco B.

An Haemophilus influenzae mutant which inhibits the growth of HP1c1 phage

A strain of Haemophilus influenzae, called hpm- inhibits the growth of phage HP1c1 but not S2. This inhibition is overcome by HP1c1ph mutants. Phage HP1c1 adsorbs normally to hpm- cells but only a small fraction of infected cells produce phage with a normal burst size or become lysogenic. When hpm- strains lysogenic for HP1c1 are induced, 100 percent of the cells yield phage. There is no degradation of phage DNA after infection of hpm- cells and HP1c1 can normally grow when its DNA is introduced into hpm- by transfection. The most probable explanation is that in hpm- cells the penetration of phage DNA is blocked. The hpm- property behaves as as unstable mutation.

Restriction and modification of bacteriophage S2 in Haemophilus influenzae

The major conclusion from these studies is that variants of Haemophilus influenzae Rd which restrict and modify phage S2 are metastable and capable of giving rise to one another with high frequency. Nonrestrictive RdS cells segregate spontaneously to the restricting, modifying phenotype in about 5% of the progeny of a single clone. The restrictive cells derived from RdS revert to the nonrestrictive phenotype in 15 to 25% of the progeny of a single clone. These frequencies are not appreciably affected by treatment with acriflavine or ethidium bromide, compounds which affect plasmid stability, or by nitrosoguanidine, a powerful mutagen. The genetic locus for restriction and modification of bacteriophage S2 is found to have a chromosomal position between the biotin and proline loci. Restriction-modification of phage S2 has been shown to be a function of its deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in that transfection with S2 phage DNA or prophage DNA is subject to host restriction and modification. An enzyme preparation, which contains endodeoxyribonuclease but no appreciable exonuclease activity, from mutant H. influenzae com(-10) did not restrict phage S2.RdS DNA or prophage DNA transfecting activity, indicating that this endodeoxyribonuclease is not responsible for phage restriction. A new restriction enzyme isolated from H. influenzae Rd was found to be the major enzyme involved in the restriction of bacteriophage S2. The enzyme inactivated the transfecting activity of unmodified phage DNA but did not attack modified phage DNA. Unlike endodeoxyribonuclease R, this enzyme requires adenosine triphosphate and S-adenosylmethionine.