Drug and treatment efficacy of chenodeoxycholic acid in 97 patients with cholelithiasis and increased surgical risk

Bile acids as regulatory molecules and potential targets in metabolic diseases

Bile acids are important hydroxylated steroids that are synthesized in the liver from cholesterol for intestinal absorption of lipids and other fatty-nutrient. They also display remarkable and immense functions such as regulating immune responses, managing the apoptosis of cells, participating in glucose metabolism, and so on. Some bile acids were used for the treatment or prevention of diseases such as gallstones, primary biliary cirrhosis, and colorectal cancer. Meanwhile, the accumulation of toxic bile acids leads to apoptosis, necrosis, and inflammation. Alteration of bile acids metabolism, as well as the gut microbiota that interacted with bile acids, contributes to the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to summarize the current functions and pre-clinical or clinical applications of bile acids, and to further discuss the alteration of bile acids in metabolic disorders as well as the manipulation of bile acids metabolism as potential therapeutic targets.

Adding ursodeoxycholic acid to the endoscopic treatment and common bile duct stenting for large and multiple biliary stones: Will it improve the outcomes?

Background

The role of common bile duct (CBD) stenting in the establishment of bile stream in the elderly patients and the ones who are not good candidates for surgery due to not responding to treatments was well documented in previous studies. The current study aimed at investigating the effect of adding Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) to CBD stenting alone in order to reduce the size of large and multiple CBD stones.

Methods

Clinical outcomes including success rates in CBD stones clearance, incidence of pancreatitis, perforation, bleeding, as well as, decrease in size of stones and liver enzymes after a two-month period were assessed in the UDCA + CBD stenting group.

Results

A total of 64 patients referring to Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Qom, Iran with multiple or large CBD stones (above three or larger than 15 mm) received standard endoscopic therapies and UDCA + CBD stenting (group B) and controls only received standard endoscopic therapies with only CBD stenting (group A). The mean reduction in the size of stones in group B was significantly higher than that of group A (3.22 ± 1.31 vs 4.09 ± 1.87 mm) (p = 0.034). There was no difference in the incidence rate of complications including pancreatitis, cholangitis, bleeding, and perforation between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Adding UDCA to CBD stenting, due to decrease in the stone size and subsequently facilitation of the stones outlet, can be considered as the first-line treatment for patients with large and multiple CBD stones. Also, in the cases with large or multi stones may be effective in reducing size and subsequently stone retrieval.

Trial registry The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qom University of Medical Sciences (ethical code: IR.MUQ.REC.1397.075); the study was also registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (No. IRCT20161205031252N8). This study adheres to CONSORT guidelines.

Comparative studies of metabolism of simultaneously administered chenodeoxycholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid in hamsters

We present the comparative studies of metabolism of chenodeoxycholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid and their taurine conjugates in the liver and fecal culture from hamsters. When [24-14C]chenodeoxycholic acid and [11,12-3H]ursodeoxycholic acid were simultaneously instilled into the jujunal loop of bile fistula hamsters, both bile acids administered were recovered mainly as their conjugates with taurine and glycine in the fistula bile. The recovery of chenodeoxycholic acid was slightly but significantly higher than that of ursodeoxycholic acid. Chenodeoxycholic acid was more efficiently conjugated with glycine than ursodeoxycholic acid. The glycine/taurine ratio in the biliary chenodeoxycholic acid was 1.9, and that in ursodeoxycholic acid was 1.6. In addition, as much as 6.2% of ursodeoxycholic acid was excreted as the unconjugated form; on the other hand only 2.4% of unconjugated chenodeoxycholic acid was excreted. When [24-14C]chenodeoxycholyltaurine and [11,12-3H]ursodeoxycholyltaurine were simultaneously administered into the ileum loop of bile fistula hamsters, both bile salts were absorbed and secreted efficiently into the bile at the same rate. These results indicate that slightly lower recovery of ursodeoxycholic acid in the bile could be due to the less effective conjugation of ursodeoxycholic acid than chenodeoxycholic acid in the liver. Deconjugation by fecal culture from a hamster proceeded more rapidly in chenodeoxycholyltaurine than ursodeoxycholyltaurine. 7-Dehyroxylation to form lithocholic acid by fecal culture was also faster in chenodeoxycholic acid than ursodeoxycholic acid. The formation of 7-oxolithocholic acid from ursodeoxycholic acid was lesser than from chenodeoxycholic acid. In summary, bacterial deconjugation followed by 7-dehydroxylation to form lithocholic acid seems to be achieved more efficiently with chenodeoxycholic acid than ursodeoxycholic acid.

Pharmacological treatment of gallstones. Practical guidelines

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Medical treatment is indicated for patients who are not fit or are afraid of surgery. For any form of medical treatment to be effective gallstones must be cholesterol rich, thus radiolucent, and the cystic duct must be patent, as indicated by gallbladder opacification on oral cholecystography. Three forms of medical treatment are currently available for clinical use--oral bile acids, bile acids as adjuncts to lithotripsy and contact dissolution using methyltertbutylether. The choice of treatment depends mainly on gallstone size. Gallstones < 6 mm in diameter are best treated with oral bile acids, chenodeoxycholic acid 15 mg/kg/day or ursodeoxycholic acid 10 mg/kg/day given alone or in combination (5 mg/kg/day each). Careful patient selection and bedtime administration of the whole daily bile acid dose enhance treatment, and may achieve up to 75% complete dissolution annually. Single stones < 30 mm in diameter or multiple stones (n < 3) are best treated with lithotripsy combined with oral bile acid for dissolution of fragments. Annual dissolution rates are about 80 and 40% for single and multiple stones, respectively. Stones of any size and number can be dissolved by direct contact dissolution using methyltertbutylether. Dissolution has been reported to be complete in almost 100% of stones, but debris is frequently left behind in the gallbladder. Following dissolution using any form of treatment, gallstones recur in about 50% of patients, and cannot be reliably prevented by low dose bile acid or dietary manipulations. Failing prevention, early detection and retreatment of recurrent stones is the best alternative option as a long term strategy.

Efficacy of bile acid therapy for gallstone dissolution: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

To define better the efficacy of bile acid therapy for dissolution of radiolucent gallstones, we performed a meta-analysis of published trials from January 1966 to September 1992. Studies were identified using a MEDLINE computer search followed by an extensive manual search. The inclusion criteria used were: randomized trial, radiolucent gallstones in a visualizing gallbladder on oral cholecystography, and complete stone dissolution confirmed by oral cholecystography or ultrasound. Study results were pooled into 6 groups: placebo: high- and low-dose chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) (> or = 10 mg.kg/day and < 10 mg.kg/day); high- and low-dose ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) (> or = 7 mg.kg/day and < 7 mg.kg/day) and combined CDCA plus UDCA. Homogeneity calculations were performed and the percentage of complete stone dissolution calculated for each group with 95% confidence intervals. Of 66 trials identified, 23 comprising 1949 patients met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1062 patients were treated with CDCA, 819 with UDCA and 78 combination therapy. In studies > 6 months' duration, high-dose UDCA completely dissolved stones in 37.3% of patients (95% C.I. 33-42%), low-dose UDCA in 20.6%) and high-dose CDCA 18.2% (95% C.I. 15-21%). Based on only two studies, combination therapy achieved dissolution in 62.8% (95% C.I. 51-74%) of patients. Stones less than 10 mm dissolved significantly more frequently than stones larger than 10 mm. This analysis shows that UDCA in doses greater than 7 mg.kg/day taken for greater than 6 months will dissolve radiolucent gallstones in 38% of patients. The combination of UDCA and CDCA may be more efficacious but this observation is based upon only 78 patients and requires confirmation in further randomized trials.

Optimum bile acid treatment for rapid gall stone dissolution

To determine the optimum bile acid regimen for rapid gall stone dissolution, 48 gall stone patients were divided into four groups of 12 according to stone diameter and were randomly allocated to receive one of four treatment regimens: bedtime or mealtime chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA, 12 mg/kg/day) and bedtime or mealtime ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA, 12 mg/kg/day). An additional 10 patients treated with a combination of CDCA plus UDCA (each 6 mg/kg/day) at bedtime were matched with the 10 patients on bedtime CDCA and the 10 on bedtime UDCA. The gall stone dissolution rates at six and 12 months were determined by standardised oral cholecystography and expressed as the percentage reduction in the gall stone volume after treatment. The gall stone dissolution rate at six months was higher for UDCA than CDCA treatment (median 78% v 48%, p less than 0.01), and for bedtime than mealtime administration (69% v 39%, p less than 0.02). Both differences were greater for stones less than 8 mm diameter. The dissolution rate was faster for combination therapy than for CDCA alone at both six (82% v 36%, p less than 0.05) and 12 months (100% v 54%, p less than 0.05), but was not different from UDCA alone. We conclude that bile acid treatment should be confined to patients with small gall stones and that bedtime administration of combined UDCA and CDCA is likely to provide the most effective and safe combination.

Review article: bile acid therapy

Over the past 3 years there has been a renewed interest in bile acid therapy not only because of the promising results obtained by combining this therapy with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for rapid gallstone dissolution, but also because of its novel use as a treatment for primary biliary cirrhosis. This article reviews the use of bile acids for both these indications.

Effect of jejunal infusion of bile acids on small bowel transit and fasting jejunal motility in man

The effect of jejunal infusion of glycochenodeoxycholic acid and glycocholic acid on small bowel transit time, fasting jejunal motility and serum bile acid concentrations was investigated in groups of five to six healthy subjects. Glycochenodeoxycholic acid at a concentration of 15 mmol/l (total amount: 5 mmol) and glycocholic acid 15 mmol/l (total amount: 5 mmol), both with lecithin 2.5 mmol/l, delayed (p less than 0.02) small bowel transit when compared with a bile acid free infusion [158.3 (12.5) min v 111.7 (17.6) min and 103.3 (21.8) min v 70.0 (14.9) min], inhibited (p less than 0.01 and p less than 0.05 respectively) the percentage duration of pressure activity of phase 2 [13.1 (1.8)% v 28.1 (3.4)% and 29.2 (5.5)% v 34.9 (3.9)%], but did not change duration of migrating motor complex, or of its phases. Glycochenodeoxycholic acid 10 mmol/l (total amount: 3.3 mmol), either with or without lecithin, did not delay small bowel transit significantly [145.0 (13.2) min v 115.0 (19.5) and 90.0 (11.7) min v 84.0 (8.3)]. When bile acids were infused, serum bile acid curves were similar to those obtained after a liquid meal and the peak serum bile acid concentration occurred 33.7 (6.6) min before (p less than 0.001) completion of small bowel transit. These observations suggest a role for endogenous bile acids in the regulation of small gut motility.

Diarrhoea and constipation

Drug-induced constipation is mostly caused by changes in gut motility, whilst diarrhoea is more frequently caused by an increase in intestinal fluid secretion. In both instances the drug has to reach the enteric nervous system or the enterocyte, either via the blood or from the lumen, in sufficient concentrations to affect the mediators that regulate motility and fluid transport. Diarrhoea and constipation are frequently mentioned as side-effects of drugs, and therapeutic agents for almost all organ systems have been implicated. However, both these side-effects are usually mild or moderate, and rarely necessitate interruption of drug treatment. An exception to this rule is the antibiotic-associated colitis seen in patients treated with antibiotics such as lincomycin or clindamycin; in principle almost all antibiotics may cause this severe and potentially life-threatening complication. Other rare forms of severe, drug-induced colitis and diarrhoea result from toxic or anaphylactic reactions against gold preparations, cytostatic agents and sulphonamides. Ischaemic colitis due to vascular complications has been described in some women taking oral contraceptives, and in patients treated with vasopressin or digitalis.

Chemical and morphologic characteristics of cholesterol gallstones that failed to dissolve on chenodiol. The National Cooperative Gallstone Study

During the National Cooperative Gallstone Study, chenodiol (chenodeoxycholate), 750 or 375 mg/day, resulted in complete gallstone dissolution in only 13.5% and 5.2% of patients, respectively. The purpose of this study was to analyze the composition and morphology of gallstones from patients who underwent cholecystectomy during the National Cooperative Gallstone Study to determine if calcium salts on the gallstone surface could have been responsible for failure of dissolution. Total gallstone calcium content was not different between the treated and placebo groups; however, surface calcium levels were different, being greater than 1.0% in 47.6% of stones from chenodiol-treated patients (n = 63) but in only 16.7% of those from placebo-treated patients (n = 18), p less than 0.02. Pigmented outer rims were found in 52.4% of the stones from the chenodiol-treated group compared with only 16.7% of stones from the placebo group, p less than 0.01. The rim calcium content of 36 stones with pigmented outer rims was 3.7% +/- 1.0%, whereas that of 45 stones with nonpigmented outer rims was only 1.0% +/- 0.3%, p less than 0.01. We conclude that the presence of rings of increased concentrations of calcium salts on the gallstone surface may impair dissolution by chenodiol.

Medical management of cholesterol gallstones

Cholesterol gallstones are a significant cause of morbidity in the U.S. Methods used to treat gallstones include cholecystectomy or medical dissolution. The primary drugs used for the dissolution of cholesterol gallstones are two bile acids, chenodeoxycholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid. Complete or partial gallstone dissolution rates using chenodeoxycholic acid have ranged from 30 to 80 percent. Factors affecting gallstone dissolution using the bile acids include the dosage and administration schedule, obesity, the stone characteristics, diet, and the duration of therapy. The adverse effects of chenodeoxycholic acid include gastrointestinal complaints, hepatotoxicity, and increased serum cholesterol. Ursodeoxycholic acid, which is investigational, differs from chenodeoxycholic acid in its mechanism of action. Ursodeoxycholic acid has similar efficacy with chenodeoxycholic acid, at a lower daily dosage, with less gastrointestinal and hepatic adverse effects. If appropriate patient selection is used, the response rate to medical therapy can range from 50 to 80 percent.

Management of gallstones. The new option of bile acid therapy

Recent approval of chenodiol by the Food and Drug Administration has given physicians a new choice of therapy for silent gallstones, but it also presents a dilemma. The longest double-blind study of the drug in one patient population covered only two years and two dosages; no equally controlled data are available documenting drug safety beyond that period or at higher dosages. Recurrence of gallstones after discontinuation of dissolution therapy is common, and thus chronic treatment may be needed. Only the future can tell what place bile acid therapy will assume in the management of gallstone disease.