Piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of community-acquired and nosocomial respiratory tract infections: a review

Penetration of piperacillin and tazobactam into pneumonic human lung tissue measured by in vivo microdialysis

OBJECTIVES

The pharmacokinetic profile of antibiotics at the site of anti-infective action is one of the most important determinants of drug response, since it correlates with antimicrobial effect. Up to now, only limited information on the lung tissue pharmacokinetics of antibiotic agents has been available. The aim of this study was to measure, using a new microdialysis-based approach, antibiotic penetration into the extracellular space fluid of pneumonic human lung parenchyma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The lung penetration of a combination of piperacillin and tazobactam, substances with low protein binding, was determined in five patients suffering from pneumonia and metapneumonic pleural empyema. The condition was treated by decortication after lateral thoracotomy. Intra-, or post-operatively, respectively, two microdialysis probes were inserted into pneumonic lung tissue, and into healthy skeletal muscle to obtain reference values. Serum and microdialysis samples were collected at 20-min intervals for at last 8 h following i.v. administration of a single dose of 4 g piperacillin and 500 mg tazobactam.

RESULTS

The mean free interstitial concentration profiles of piperacillin in infected lung tissue and serum showed a maximal tissue concentration (Cmax) of 176.0 +/- 105.0 mg l-1 and 326.0 +/- 60.6 mg l-1, respectively. The mean AUC (area under the curve) for infected lung tissue was 288.0 +/- 167.0 mg.h l-1 and for serum 470.0 +/- 142.0 mg.h l-1. There was a statistically significant difference between AUC (lung) and AUC (serum) (P = 0.018) as well as between AUC (lung) and AUC (muscle) (P = 0.043). The intrapulmonary concentrations of piperacillin and tazobactam exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for most relevant bacteria for 4-6 h. The procedure was well tolerated by all patients and no adverse events or microdialysis-associated side-effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

This microdialysis technique enabled continuous tissue pharmacokinetic measurement of free, unbound anti-infective agents in the lung tissue of patients with pneumonia. The present data corroborate the use of piperacillin and tazobactam in the treatment of lung infections caused by extracellular bacteria and demonstrate the distribution of piperacillin and tazobactam in the interstitial space of pneumonic lung tissue.

Prospective randomized comparison of imipenem-cilastatin and piperacillin-tazobactam in nosocomial pneumonia or peritonitis

Nosocomial pneumonia and acute peritonitis may be caused by a wide array of pathogens, and combination therapy is often recommended. We have previously shown that imipenem-cilastatin monotherapy was as efficacious as the combination of imipenem-cilastatin plus netilmicin in these two settings. The efficacy of imipenem-cilastatin is now compared to that of piperacillin-tazobactam as monotherapy in patients with nosocomial pneumonia or acute peritonitis. Three hundred seventy one patients with nosocomial pneumonia or peritonitis were randomly assigned to receive either imipenem-cilastatin (0.5 g four times a day) or piperacillin-tazobactam (4.5 g three times a day). Three hundred thirteen were assessable (154 with nosocomial pneumonia and 159 with peritonitis). For nosocomial pneumonia, clinical-failure rates in the piperacillin-tazobactam group (13 of 75 [17%]) and in the imipenem-cilastatin group (23 of 79 [29%]) were similar (P = 0.09), as were the numbers of deaths due to infection (6 in the imipenem-cilastatin group [8%], 7 in the piperacillin-tazobactam group [9%]) (P = 0.78). For acute peritonitis, clinical success rates were comparable (piperacillin-tazobactam, 72 of 76 [95%]; imipenem-cilastatin, 77 of 83 [93%]). For infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 45 patients had nosocomial pneumonia (21 in the piperacillin-tazobactam group and 24 in the imipenem-cilastatin group) and 10 had peritonitis (5 in each group). In the patients with nosocomial pneumonia, clinical failure was less frequent in the piperacillin-tazobactam group (2 of 21 [10%]) than in the imipenem-cilastatin [corrected] group (12 of 24 [50%]) (P = 0.004). Bacterial resistance to allocated regimen was the main cause of clinical failure (1 in the piperacillin-tazobactam group and 12 in the imipenem-cilastatin group). For the patients with peritonitis, no difference in clinical outcome was observed (five of five cured in each group). The overall frequencies of adverse events related to treatment in the two groups were similar (24 in the piperacillin-tazobactam group, 22 in the imipenem-cilastatin group). Diarrhea was significantly more frequent in the piperacillin-tazobactam group (10 of 24) than in the imipenem-cilastatin group (2 of 22). This study suggests that piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy is at least as effective and safe as imipenem-cilastatin monotherapy in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia or peritonitis. In P. aeruginosa pneumonia, piperacillin-tazobactam achieved a better clinical efficacy than imipenem-cilastatin, due to reduced development of microbiological resistance. Tolerance was comparable, with the exception of diarrhea, which was more frequent with piperacillin-tazobactam.

Immunotherapy in the management of sepsis

The pathophysiological effects of severe sepsis, septic shock and related syndromes result from tissues damaged by the uncontrolled production of the mediators of inflammation. Early deaths are related primarily to the acute effects of the systemic inflammatory response. Later deaths are related more closely to the consequences of multiple organ dysfunction. Monoclonal antibodies and other immunotherapies have been developed against bacterial products, cytokines and other mediators involved in this systemic inflammatory response. Immunotherapies may improve outcome in the critically ill with sepsis if used early and as part of the therapeutic regimen of antimicrobial agents and intensive care support.