Molecular environment of the phencyclidine binding site in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor membrane

Site specificity of agonist-induced opening and desensitization of the Torpedo californica nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

Agonist-binding kinetics to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) from Torpedo californica were measured using sequential-mixing stopped-flow fluorescence methods to determine the contribution of each individual site to agonist-induced opening and desensitization. Timed dansyl-C6-choline (DC6C) binding followed by its dissociation upon mixing with high, competing agonist concentrations revealed four kinetic components: an initial, fast fluorescence decay, followed by a transient increase, and then two characteristic decays that reflect dissociation from the desensitized agonist sites. The transient increase resulted from DC6C binding to the open-channel based on its prevention by proadifen, a noncompetitive antagonist. Further characterization of DC6C channel binding by the inhibition of [3H]phencyclidine binding and by equilibrium measurements of DC6C fluorescence yielded KD values of 2-4 microM for the desensitized AChR and approximately 600 microM for the closed state. At this site, DC6C displayed a strongly blue-shifted emission spectrum, higher intrinsic fluorescence, and weaker energy transfer from tryptophans than when bound to either agonist site. The initial, fast fluorescence decay was assigned to DC6C dissociation from the alphadelta site of the AChR in its closed conformation, on the basis of inhibition with the site-selective antagonists d-tubocurarine and alpha-conotoxin MI. Fast decay amplitude data indicated an apparent affinity of 0.9 microM for the closed-state alphadelta site; the closed-state alphagamma-site affinity is inferred to be near 100 microM. These values and the known affinities for the desensitized conformation show that the alphagamma site drives AChR desensitization to a approximately 40-fold greater extent than the alphadelta site, undergoes energetically larger conformational changes, and is the primary determinant of agonist potency.

Binding properties of agonists and antagonists to distinct allosteric states of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor are incompatible with a concerted model

Recent work has shown that the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) can be fixed in distinct conformations by chemical cross-linking with glutardialdehyde, which abolishes allosteric transitions in the protein. Here, two conformations that resemble the desensitized and the resting states were compared with respect to their affinities for different classes of ligands. The same ligands were tested for their ability to convert the nAChR from a conformation with low affinity to a conformation with high affinity for acetylcholine. As expected, agonists were found to bind with higher affinity to the desensitized state-like conformation and to induce a shift of the nAChR to this high affinity state. In contrast, although most antagonists tested bound preferentially to the desensitized receptor as well they failed to induce a change of the affinity for acetylcholine. These observations sharply contradict basic predictions of the concerted model, including the postulate of a preformed equilibrium between the different states of the nAChR in the absence of agonist. With a similar approach we could show that the non-competitive inhibitor ethidium is displaced in a non-allosteric manner by other well characterized channel blockers from the cross-linked nAChR. These results require revision of current models for the mechanisms underlying non-competitive antagonism at the nAChR.

5-Doxylstearate-induced displacement of phencyclidine from its low-affinity binding sites on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

Fatty acids as well as phencyclidine (PCP) inhibit the ion channel activity of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) by a noncompetitive mechanism. However, the exact localization of the fatty acid binding sites is unknown and, thus, the noncompetitive inhibitory mechanism for these endogenous modulators remains to be elucidated. In an attempt to determine the location of the fatty acid binding sites, we study the mutually exclusive action between 5-doxylstearate (5-SASL), a derivative of the endogenous noncompetitive antagonist (NCA) stearic acid, and other exogenous NCAs. For this purpose, both equilibrium and competitive binding assays using fluorescent and radiolabeled ligands were performed on desensitized AChRs. More specifically, we determined: (i) the effect of 5-SASL on the binding of the exogenous NCA [(3)H]PCP; (ii) the effect of 5-SASL on the binding of either quinacrine or ethidium, two fluorescent NCAs from exogenous origin; and (iii) the PCP-induced displacement of quinacrine and ethidium from their respective high-affinity binding sites. Our first target (i) is carried out by measuring the [(3)H]PCP binding in the absence or in the presence of increasing concentrations of 5-SASL. We found that 5-SASL displaces PCP from its low-affinity binding sites. The low-affinity PCP binding sites were pharmacologically characterized by an apparent dissociation constant (K(d)) of 6.1 +/- 5.0 microM and a stoichiometry of 3.7 +/- 1.5 sites per AChR. The fact that 5-SASL increased the apparent K(d) without changing the number of sites per AChR is indicative of a mutually exclusive action. From these results, an apparent inhibition constant (K(i)) of 75 +/- 31 microM for 5-SASL was calculated. In addition, 5-SASL affected neither the apparent K(d) (0.46 +/- 0.37 microM) nor the stoichiometry (1.07 +/- 0.57 sites per AChR) of the high-affinity PCP binding site. The second objective (ii) is achieved by titrating either quinacrine or ethidium into AChR native membranes in the absence or in the presence of increasing concentrations of 5-SASL. These experiments showed that 5-SASL efficiently increased the apparent K(d) of quinacrine without perturbing the interaction of ethidium with its high-affinity locus. Considering that (a) 5-SASL effectively quenched the AChR-bound quinacrine fluorescence (H. R. Arias, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1347, 9-22, 1997) and (b) fluorescence-quenching is a short-range process, it is possible to suggest that 5-SASL displaces quinacrine from its high-affinity binding site by a steric mechanism. In this regard, a K(i) of 38 +/- 5 microM for 5-SASL was calculated. Concerning the last objective (iii), AChR-bound quinacrine or ethidium was back titrated with PCP. Two PCP K(i) values were obtained by fitting the displacement plots by nonlinear regression with two components. The lowest K(i) values obtained for either quinacrine (0.86 +/- 0.37 microM) or ethidium (0. 29 +/- 0.23 microM) displacement from their respective high-affinity binding sites coincide with the previously determined high-affinity [(3)H]PCP K(d). In addition, the highest K(i) values obtained for either NCA displacement are in the same concentration range as the observed low-affinity [(3)H]PCP K(d). Taking into account all experimental data, we reached the following conclusions: (i) fatty acid molecules, or at least 5-SASL, sterically interact with both the PCP low-affinity and the quinacrine high-affinity binding sites; (ii) the low-affinity PCP binding sites, as well as the high-affinity quinacrine locus, are located at the nonannular lipid domain of the AChR; and, finally, (iii) fatty acid molecules are not accessible to the lumen of the ion channel, indicating an allosteric mode of action for fatty acids to inhibit ion flux. Thus, the 5-SASL, the quinacrine high-affinity, and the PCP low-affinity binding sites are all located at overlapping nonannular loci on the muscle-type AChR.

Probing the structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ion channel with the uncharged photoactivable compound -3H-diazofluorene

The uncharged photoactivable probe 2-[3H]diazofluorene ([3H]DAF) was used to examine structural changes in the Torpedo californica nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) ion channel induced by agonists. Photoincorporation of [3H]DAF into the AChR consisted of the following two components: a nonspecific component consistent with incorporation into residues situated at the lipid-protein interface, and a specific component, inhibitable by noncompetitive antagonists and localized to the M2 hydrophobic segments of AChR subunits. The nonspecific [3H]DAF incorporation was characterized in the M4 segment of each AChR subunit. The observed distribution and periodicity of labeled residues reinforce the conclusion that the M4 segments are organized as transmembrane alpha-helices with a common "face" of each helix in contact with lipid. Within the M2 segments, in the absence of agonist [3H]DAF specifically labeled homologous residues betaVal-261 and deltaVal-269, with incorporation into deltaVal-269 at a 5-fold greater efficiency than into betaVal-261. This observation, coupled with the lack of detectable incorporation into alpha-M2 including the homologous alphaVal-255, indicates that within the resting channel [3H]DAF is bound with its photoreactive diazo group oriented toward deltaVal-269. In the presence of agonist, there is an approximately 90% reduction in the labeling of betaVal-261 and deltaVal-269 accompanied by specific incorporation into residues (betaLeu-257, betaAla-258, deltaSer-262, and deltaLeu-265) situated 1 or 2 turns of an alpha-helix closer to the cytoplasmic end of the M2 segments. The results provide a further characterization of agonist-induced rearrangements of the M2 (ion channel) domain of the AChR.

Topology of ligand binding sites on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) presents two very well differentiated domains for ligand binding that account for different cholinergic properties. In the hydrophilic extracellular region of both alpha subunits there exist the binding sites for agonists such as the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh) and for competitive antagonists such as d-tubocurarine. Agonists trigger the channel opening upon binding while competitive antagonists compete for the former ones and inhibit its pharmacological action. Identification of all residues involved in recognition and binding of agonist and competitive antagonists is a primary objective in order to understand which structural components are related to the physiological function of the AChR. The picture for the localisation of the agonist/competitive antagonist binding sites is now clearer in the light of newer and better experimental evidence. These sites are mainly located on both alpha subunits in a pocket approximately 30-35 A above the surface membrane. Since both alpha subunits are sequentially identical, the observed high and low affinity for agonists on the receptor is conditioned by the interaction of the alpha subunit with the delta or the gamma chain, respectively. This relationship is opposite for curare-related drugs. This molecular interaction takes place probably at the interface formed by the different subunits. The principal component for the agonist/competitive antagonist binding sites involves several aromatic residues, in addition to the cysteine pair at 192-193, in three loops-forming binding domains (loops A-C). Other residues such as the negatively changed aspartates and glutamates (loop D), Thr or Tyr (loop E), and Trp (loop F) from non-alpha subunits were also found to form the complementary component of the agonist/competitive antagonist binding sites. Neurotoxins such as alpha-, kappa-bungarotoxin and several alpha-conotoxins seem to partially overlap with the agonist/competitive antagonist binding sites at multiple point of contacts. The alpha subunits also carry the binding site for certain acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as eserine and for the neurotransmitter 5-hydroxytryptamine which activate the receptor without interacting with the classical agonist binding sites. The link between specific subunits by means of the binding of ACh molecules might play a pivotal role in the relative shift among receptor subunits. This conformational change would allow for the opening of the intrinsic receptor cation channel transducting the external chemical signal elicited by the agonist into membrane depolarisation. The ion flux activity can be inhibited by non-competitive inhibitors (NCIs). For this kind of drugs, a population of low-affinity binding sites has been found at the lipid-protein interface of the AChR. In addition, several high-affinity binding sites have been found to be located at different rings on the M2 transmembrane domain, namely luminal binding sites. In this regard, the serine ring is the locus for exogenous NCIs such as chlorpromazine, triphenylmethylphosphonium, the local anaesthetic QX-222, phencyclidine, and trifluoromethyliodophenyldiazirine. Trifluoromethyliodophenyldiazirine also binds to the valine ring, which is the postulated site for cembranoids. Additionally, the local anaesthetic meproadifen binding site seems to be located at the outer or extracellular ring. Interestingly, the M2 domain is also the locus for endogenous NCIs such as the neuropeptide substance P and the neurotransmitter 5-hydroxytryptamine. In contrast with this fact, experimental evidence supports the hypothesis for the existence of other NCI high-affinity binding sites located not at the channel lumen but at non-luminal binding domains. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Luminal and non-luminal non-competitive inhibitor binding sites on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor presents two very well differentiated domains for ligand binding that account for different cholinergic properties. In the hydrophilic extracellular region of the alpha subunit exist the binding sites for agonists such as the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, which upon binding trigger the channel opening, and for competitive antagonists such as d-tubocurarine, which compete for the former inhibiting its pharmacological action. For non-competitive inhibitors, a population of low-affinity binding sites have been found at the lipid-protein interface of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. In addition, at the M2 transmembrane domain, several high-affinity binding sites have been found for non-competitive inhibitors such as chlorpromazine, triphenylmethylphosphonium, the local anaesthetic QX-222 and the hydrophobic probe trifluoromethyl-iodophenyldiazirine. They are known as luminal binding sites. Although the local anaesthetic meproadifen seems to be located between the hydrophobic domains M2-M3, this locus is considered to form part of the channel mouth, thus this site can also be called a luminal binding site. In contraposition, experimental evidences support the hypothesis of the existence of other high-affinity binding sites for non-competitive inhibitors located not at the channel lumen, but at non-luminal binding domains. Among them, we can quote the binding site for quinacrine, which is located at the lipid-protein interface of the alpha M1 domain, and the binding site for ethidium, which is believed to interact with the wall of the vestibule very far away from both the lumen channel and the lipid membrane surface. The aim of this review is to discuss these recent findings relative to both structurally and functionally relevant aspects of non-competitive inhibitors of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. We will put special emphasis on the description of the localization of molecules with non-competitive antagonist properties that bind with high-affinity to luminal and non-luminal domains. The information described herein was principally obtained by means of methods such as photolabelling and site-directed mutagenesis in combination with patch-clamp. Our laboratory has contributed with data obtained by using biophysical approaches such as paramagnetic electron spin resonance and quantitative fluorescence spectroscopy.

Effects of halothane on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica

To determine whether the binding of anesthetics to key membrane receptors is a plausible mode of action, we modeled the effect of the general anesthetic halothane in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor membrane system isolated from Torpedo californica. Our results demonstrated that halothane inhibits the binding of [3H]phencyclidine ([3H]PCP) to the acetylcholine receptor. The inhibition was reversible, concentration dependent, and had an equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) of 2.2% atm halothane at 25 degrees. Double-reciprocal plots of the halothane effects at various phencyclidine (PCP) concentrations imply that, under equilibrium conditions, halothane inhibits [3H]PCP binding competitively. In contrast, results from kinetic studies showed that the rate of PCP dissociation is highly sensitive to halothane with EC50 = 0.8% atm halothane in nitrogen. Several possible interpretations are discussed; however, the basic observation was that the kinetics of [3H]PCP binding to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor was affected by halothane at low concentrations in this model system.