Distribution of bilateral dorsal root potentials evoked by volleys in afferents entering lumbar and sacral segments of the spinal cord

Antidromic discharges in dorsal roots of decerebrate cats. II: studies during treadmill locomotion

In a previous companion paper [Brain Res. 846 (1999) 87-105] we have shown that the dorsal root activity of a decerebrate cat is composed of both orthodromic and antidromic discharges as determined by spike triggered averaging (STA). Furthermore we have shown that, during fictive locomotion in decerebrate and paralyzed cats, antidromic discharges peak in different parts of locomotion cycle but mainly in the flexion phase. In the present study, we have recorded unit potentials from dorsal rootlets during treadmill locomotion in order to understand better the role of movement-related feedback in the generation of antidromic potentials. The unitary activity of 92 antidromically discharging units was recorded in proximal stumps of cut dorsal roots, and that of 20 such units was recorded in uncut roots using two bipolar Ag/AgCl electrodes in both cases. The activity of 80% (74/92) units in cut filaments and of 70% (14/20) units in uncut ones was phasewise related to stepping movements. The peaks of activity of different units occurred during different phases of the step cycle both in cut and uncut filaments. In most cases, the peak of activity was superimposed upon a background of sustained discharge. After blocking the orthodromic flow in a filament (local anesthesia or distal section), the antidromic discharges continued to peak during the same phase but the rate of the discharges increased. We conclude that movement-related afferent feedback significantly modulates the antidromic discharges in dorsal roots during treadmill locomotion. We suggest that these antidromic discharges have a role in controlling afferent feedback during movement.

Antidromic discharges in dorsal roots of decerebrate cats. I. Studies at rest and during fictive locomotion

Spontaneous rhythmic antidromic discharges have previously been recorded in proximal stumps of cut dorsal roots during locomotion (real and fictive). The goals of the present study were to elucidate (1) whether both orthodromic and antidromic discharges occur in the same dorsal root filament and (2) whether orthodromic discharges have an influence upon antidromic discharges of units in the same filament. Unitary activity was recorded in 70 uncut dorsal root filaments (L6-S1) in 15 decerebrate cats using bipolar Ag/AgCl electrodes. Spikes with similar wave shapes were considered to represent the activity of single units. Spike-triggered averaging (STA), local anaesthesia and transection of filaments were used to determine the direction of propagation of spikes. Spikes with different initial electrical polarities were found in most of the filaments and shown to propagate in opposite directions at rest and during fictive locomotion. On average, there were 38%+/-S.D. 23% antidromically discharging units per filament and their mean conduction velocity was 55 m/s+/-S.D. 25 m/s. After blocking orthodromic activity of the whole filament by a transection or local anesthesia applied distally to the recording site, changes were seen in the antidromic discharges of some units suggesting that spontaneous orthodromic discharges normally seen in the filament may influence the antidromic discharges of some units. Moreover, out of 27 antidromic units recorded during fictive locomotion, 12 were rhythmically modulated with peak discharges occurring in various parts of the locomotor cycle. We conclude that, in uncut dorsal roots, there is a normal coexistence of spontaneous orthodromic and antidromic discharges revealed by STA and that there is an interaction between spontaneous orthodromic and antidromic discharges.

Excitatory responses of the dorsal root discharge to stimulation of cutaneous and muscle afferents in the cat

Excitatory responses of the dorsal root discharge (DRD) consisting in transient increase in its frequency have been studied in non-anaesthetized low spinal cats. They were evoked by stimulation of cutaneous nerves (superficial peroneal and posterior tibial) and muscle nerves (gastrocnemius-soleus and posterior biceps-semitendinosus), recorded from the central cut ends of single fibres of L7 dorsal roots. The excitatory responses were elicited by single volleys in low threshold cutaneous and group II muscle afferents. Group III afferents of gastrocnemius-soleus nerve were also effective. Increase in strength of stimulation of posterior biceps-semitendinosus nerve from 4T to 40T which activated group III muscle afferents significantly decreased the excitatory effects of the DRD. Incidence of excitatory responses of the DRD to volleys both in low and high threshold cutaneous afferents, was 100%. Frequency of occurrence of excitatory effects to volleys in group II muscle afferents ranged from 23% to 43% (for responses to posterior biceps-semitendinosus and gastrocnemius-soleus volleys, respectively). It was increased to 47% and 72% when excitatory effects were elicited by group III afferent volleys. These findings indicate that only some types of afferent fibres evoke excitatory responses of the DRD. Variable incidence of the excitatory responses to stimulation of cutaneous and muscle afferents suggests important difference in effectiveness of connections between both types of fibres and interneurones generating the DRD.