Physiology of rectal sensations: a mathematic approach

Compliance and capacity of the normal human rectum--physical considerations and measurement pitfalls

The assessment of parameters which adequately represent rectal and neorectal compliance is complex. Biological properties of the rectum during distension and relaxation show significant departures from in vitro physical compliance measurements; as much dependent upon the viscoelastic charateristics of hollow organ deformation as upon the technique of compliance calculation. This review discusses the pressure/volume characteristics of importance in the rectum during distension from a bioengineering perspective and outlines the disparities of such measurements in living biological systems. Techniques and pitfalls of newer methods to assess rectal wall stiffness (impedance planimetry and barostat measurement) are discussed.

Rectoanal sensorimotor response in humans during rectal distension

PURPOSE

Rectal perception facilitates maintenance of continence and defecation. Whether perception is associated with motor changes in anorectum is unclear. We examined sensory and motor responses of the anorectum during rectal distention.

METHODS

Stepwise graded rectal balloon distensions were performed in 23 healthy subjects by placing a six-sensor probe in the anorectum. Manometric changes, rectoanal reflexes, and sensory thresholds were assessed. Studies were repeated in six subjects.

RESULTS

All subjects showed rectoanal inhibitory and contractile reflexes, but rectal perception was associated with an anal contractile response (sensorimotor response). In 4 subjects (17 percent) the sensorimotor response first occurred synchronously with a sensation of fullness (Group 1) and in 19 (83 percent) with a desire to defecate (Group 2). Mean balloon volume for inducing the sensorimotor response in Groups 1 and 2 were 80 +/- 14 ml and 96 +/- 26 ml (P > 0.05). The onset, amplitude, duration, and area under curve of the response were similar in both groups. At higher volumes of balloon distention, all subjects (n = 23) reported a desire and an urge to defecate. The sensorimotor response associated with an urge to defecate had higher amplitude (P = 0.01) and higher area under curve (P = 0.001) compared with that associated with a desire to defecate. Repeat studies showed good reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.9; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A desire to defecate is associated with a unique, consistent, and reproducible anal contractile response: the sensorimotor response. This response could play an integral role in regulating anorectal sensation and function.

A prospective evaluation of anorectal function after total mesorectal excision in patients with a rectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Rectum resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) and neorectal anastomosis often compromises anorectal function. Insight into the underlying mechanisms is lacking. Therefore, a prospective study was designed to investigate the relationship between clinical and functional outcomes preoperatively and postoperatively.

METHODS

Eleven patients with rectal cancer were examined before and 4 and 12 months after surgery and compared with 11 healthy volunteers (HVs). Anorectal (neorectal) function was examined by clinical outcome questionnaire, anal manometry, rectal compliance, and sensation. Six HVs also underwent barostat measurements in the sigmoid colon.

RESULTS

Clinical parameters of soiling and passive incontinence (loss of stool without sensation) increased significantly until 12 months postoperatively, whereas urgency and tenesmus increased temporarily, returning to preoperative values at 12 months. In anorectal measurements, anal sphincter function was grossly preserved; however, rectal-anal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) was decreased at 4 months but recovered after 1 year. Neorectal compliance was similar to that of HV sigmoid, increasing slightly after 12 months but still significantly lower than that of normal rectum. Neorectal sensation to pressure distention was similar to that of normal rectum, however accompanied by smaller volumes. Neorectal distention induced contractions of large amplitude at 4 months, returning to normal after 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the transient increase in urgency and tenesmus after surgery results from a temporary increase in neorectal "irritability" accompanied by some adaptation of compliance in time. In contrast, episodes of incontinence and soiling are increased after 1 year most likely because of reduced neorectal capacity and RAIR recovery in the presence of a low basal anal sphincter pressure.

Rectal visceral sensitivity in healthy volunteers: influences of gender, age and methods

The barostat is a device that maintains a constant pressure within an air-filled polyethylene bag by means of a feedback mechanism. The system measures variations in rectal tone by recording changes in the intrarectal pressure and volume. Different procedures, such as ramp distension or intermittent distension, are used to test visceral sensitivity and rectal wall compliance. It is not quite clear which method is preferable and how the barostat measurements compare with those of the conventional latex balloon. In 28 healthy volunteers (11 males, mean age 36, range 22-67 years) rectal distension was performed in two ways: 1 Pressure-controlled distension, by both intermittent and ramp methods, with measurement on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-5) at 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32 and 36 mmHg. Hysteresis (comparing area under the curve during deflation and inflation with ramp pressure distension) and compliance were calculated. 2 Volume-controlled distension, with registration of first sensation, urge to defecate and maximal tolerated distension. This procedure was compared to conventional water-filled latex balloon distension. No differences were found between intermittent and ramp distension comparing VAS scores at the same pressures. Gender or age did not affect the VAS score. Males had larger volumes at the same pressures than females. Females had larger hysteresis than males. Older females had larger hysteresis than younger females. The pressure volume curves were S-shaped. Compliance at maximal tolerated distension (V/p) and maximal dynamic compliance (Delta V/Delta p) was higher in males than females. The polyethylene bag had higher MTV and MTP compared to the latex balloon. In conclusion, no differences were found in volumes, compliance or VAS between the intermittent and the ramp pressure-controlled inflation, indicating potential for simplification of the procedure. Males had larger rectal volumes and compliances; females had more pronounced hysteresis. A systemic difference was found between distension with the water-filled latex balloon and with the air-filled polyethylene bag. This should be taken into account when interpreting results.

Fecal incontinence with normal anal canal pressures: where is the pitfall?

OBJECTIVE

One third of subjects who suffer from fecal incontinence are found to have values within the normal range when anal manometry is performed. For these patients, one hypothesis is that impaired rectal adaptation to distension may occur. The aim of our study was to analyze anorectal responses to rectal isobaric distension in this population.

METHODS

This was a prospective study conducted in 51 consecutive incontinent patients (45 female, six male) divided into two groups according to their functional anal state: absence (19 patients aged 55 +/- 6 yr) or presence of manometric anal weakness (32 patients aged 59 +/- 2 yr). The subjects were submitted to two randomized modes of rectal isobaric distension (tonic, phasic) with an electronic barostat. Anal pressures, perception, and volumes of the rectum were recorded at six different preselected pressures.

RESULTS

As compared with those having anal weakness, patients with no anal weakness retained higher mean pressures at both upper (36.9 +/- 2.2 vs 22.9 +/- 1.4 mm Hg; p = 0.01) and lower parts (41.0 +/- 2.0 vs 23.3 +/- 1.4 mm Hg; p = 0.002) of the anal canal, similar perception scores, but much lower rectal volumes (68.5 +/- 5.5 vs 121.8 +/- 7.0 ml; p = 0.008) in response to rectal isobaric distension.

CONCLUSION

A decrease in rectal adaptation could be involved in fecal leakage in patients with no anal manometric weakness.