Comparison of methods used for measurement of rectal compliance

Novel insights into physiological mechanisms underlying fecal continence

The machinery maintaining fecal continence prevents involuntary loss of stool and is based on the synchronized interplay of multiple voluntary and involuntary mechanisms, dependent on cooperation between motor responses of the musculature of the colon, pelvic floor, and anorectum, and sensory and motor neural pathways. Knowledge of the physiology of fecal continence is key toward understanding the pathophysiology of fecal incontinence. The idea that involuntary contraction of the internal anal sphincter is the primary mechanism of continence and that the external anal sphincter supports continence only by voluntary contraction is outdated. Other mechanisms have come to the forefront, and they have significantly changed viewpoints on the mechanisms of continence and incontinence. For instance, involuntary contractions of the external anal sphincter, the puborectal muscle, and the sphincter of O'Beirne have been proven to play a role in fecal continence. Also, retrograde propagating cyclic motor patterns in the sigmoid and rectum promote retrograde transit to prevent the continuous flow of content into the anal canal. With this review, we aim to give an overview of primary and secondary mechanisms controlling fecal continence and evaluate the strength of evidence.

Type of Rectal Barostat Protocol Affects Classification of Hypersensitivity and Prediction of Symptom Severity in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Background/Aims

Visceral hypersensitivity is an important pathophysiologic mechanism in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We compared 2 barostat distension protocols and their ability to distinguish between IBS patients and healthy controls, identify subjects with rectal hypersensitivity, and their associations with gastrointestinal symptom severity.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all patients at our unit that had undergone barostat investigations 2002-2014. Protocol 1 (n = 369) used phasic isobaric distensions with stepwise increments in pressure and protocol 2 (n = 153) used pressure controlled ramp inflations. Both protocols terminated when subjects reported pain or maximum pressure was reached. Thresholds for first sensation, urgency, discomfort and pain were established. Age- and gender-matched controls were used for comparison. The gastrointestinal symptom rating scale-IBS, and the hospital anxiety and depression scale were used for symptom reports.

Results

A significantly higher proportion of patients was classified as having hypersensitivity in protocol 1 vs protocol 2 for all thresholds (P < 0.001). Patients with visceral hypersensitivity, defined based on rectal pain thresholds in protocol 1 had more severe gastrointestinal symptoms overall as well as anxiety, whereas these associations were weaker or in most cases absent when visceral hypersensitivity was defined based on rectal pain thresholds in protocol 2.

Conclusion

Our study indicates that a rectal barostat protocol using phasic isobaric distensions with stepwise pressure increments is more sensitive in IBS patients with respect to identifying subjects with rectal hypersensitivity and a link with IBS symptoms.

Comparison of long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for constipation and faecal incontinence with focus on explantation rate, additional visits, and patient satisfaction

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for constipation (SNS-C) with SNS for idiopathic faecal incontinence (SNS-IFI) regarding explantation rate, additional visits, and improvement of patient satisfaction 5 years after implantation.

METHODS

From our prospective database (launched in 2009), we extracted all SNS-C patients 5 years post-implantation, and the SNS-IFI patients implanted just before and just after each SNS-C patient. We retrospectively evaluated the explantation rate, number of additional visits, and patient satisfaction using a visual analogue scale (VAS). We hypothesized that compared with those in the SNS-IFI group: (1) the explantation rate would be higher in SNS-C patients, (2) the number of additional visits would be higher in SNS-C patients, and (3) in patients with an active implant at 5 years, the improvement in VAS would be the same.

RESULTS

We included 40 SNS-C patients and 80 SNS-IFI patients. In the SNS-C group 7/40 (17.5%), patients were explanted, compared to 10/80 (12.5%) patients in the SNS-IFI group (p = 0.56). The mean number of additional visits in the SNS-C group was 3.5 (95% CI 2.8-4.1)) and 3.0 (95% CI 2.6-3.6)) in the SNS-IFI group (p = 0.38). Additional visits due to loss of efficacy were significantly higher in the SNS-C patients (p = 0.03). The reduction in VAS score (delta VAS) at 5 years was 37.1 (95% CI 20.9-53.3) in the SNS-C group, and 46.0 (95% CI 37.9-54.0) in the SNS-IFI group (p = 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was found regarding explantation rate, number of additional visits, or improvement of VAS at 5 years after SNS implantation between SNS-C patients and SNS-IFI patients.

Anal sphincter dysfunction in patients treated with primary radiotherapy for anal cancer: a study with the functional lumen imaging probe

BACKGROUND

Sphincter-sparing radiotherapy or chemoradiation are standard treatments for patients with anal cancer. The ultimate treatment goal is full recovery from anal cancer with preserved anorectal function. Unfortunately, long-term survivors often suffer from severe anorectal symptoms. The aim of the present study was to characterize changes in anorectal physiology after radiotherapy for anal cancer.

METHOD

We included 13 patients (10 women, age 63.4 ± 1.9) treated with radiotherapy or chemoradiation for anal cancer and 14 healthy volunteers (9 women, age 61.4 ± 1.5). Symptoms were assessed with scores for fecal incontinence and low anterior resection syndrome. Anorectal physiology was examined with anorectal manometry and the Functional Lumen Imaging Probe.

RESULTS

Patients had a median Wexner fecal incontinence score of 5 (0-13) and a median LARS score of 29 (0-39). Compared to healthy volunteers, patients had lower mean (±SE) anal -resting (38 ± 5 vs. 71 ± 6, p < .001) and -squeeze pressures (76 ± 11 vs. 165 ± 15, p < .001). Patients also had lower anal yield pressure (15.5 ± 1.3 mmHg vs. 28.0 ± 2.0 mmHg, p < .001), higher distensibility, and lower resistance to flow (reduced resistance ratio of the anal canal during distension, q = 5.09, p < .001). No differences were found in median (range) rectal volumes at first sensation (70.5 (15-131) vs. 57 (18-132) ml, p > .4), urge (103 (54-176) vs. 90 (32-212), p > .6) or maximum tolerable volume (173 (86-413) vs. 119.5 (54-269) ml, p > .10).

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with radiotherapy or chemoradiation for anal cancer have low anal resting and squeeze pressures as well as reduced resistance to distension and flow.

Values From Three-dimensional High-resolution Anorectal Manometry Analysis of Children Without Lower Gastrointestinal Symptoms

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry (3DHRAM) provides a topographic image of pressure along the anal canal. We aimed to determine normal 3DHRAM values in children.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of 61 children (34 male; mean age, 8.28 years) without any symptoms arising from the lower gastrointestinal tract who were evaluated at the Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland. Manometry procedures were performed by using a rigid probe without medication. Pressure within the anal canal and 3D images of sphincters were measured. If possible, squeeze pressure and thresholds of sensation were evaluated. The population was divided into age groups of <5 years, 5-8 years, 9-12 years, and older than 12 years.

RESULTS

The mean resting and squeeze sphincter pressures were 83 ± 23 mm Hg and 191 ± 64 mm Hg, respectively. The mean length of the anal canal was 2.62 ± 0.68 cm and correlated with age (r = 0.49, P < .0001). The mean rectal balloon volume to elicit rectoanal inhibitory reflex was 15.7 ± 10.9 cm(3). The first sensation, urge, and discomfort were observed at balloon volumes of 24.4 ± 23.98 cm(3), 45.9 ± 34.55 cm(3), and 91.6 ± 50.17 cm(3), respectively. The mean resting pressure of the puborectalis muscle was 69 ± 14 mm Hg, whereas the mean squeeze pressure was 124 ± 33 mm Hg. There was no statistically significant difference in pressure parameters between age groups. We observed a positive correlation between age and balloon volume needed to elicit discomfort (r = 0.49, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a prospective study, we determined normal values from 3DHRAM analysis of children without symptoms arising from the lower gastrointestinal tract. There were no significant differences in pressure results between children of different sexes or ages. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02236507.

Bilateral compared with unilateral sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: results of a randomized, single-blinded crossover study

AIM

This randomized single-blinded crossover study aimed to investigate whether bilateral sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is more efficient than unilateral stimulation for faecal incontinence (FI).

METHOD

Patients with FI who responded during a unilateral test stimulation, with a minimum improvement of 50% were eligible. Twenty-seven patients who were accepted to enter the trial were bilaterally implanted with two permanent leads and pacemakers. Patients were randomized into three periods of 4 weeks' stimulation including unilateral right, unilateral left and bilateral stimulation. Symptoms scores and bowel habit diaries were collected at baseline and in each study period. A 1-week washout was introduced between each study period.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven (25 female) patients with a median age of 63 (36-84) years were bilaterally implanted from May 2009 to June 2012. The median number of episodes of FI per 3 weeks significantly decreased from 17 (3-54) at baseline to 2 (0-20) during stimulation on the right side, 2 (0-42) during stimulation on the left side and 1 (0-25) during bilateral stimulation. The Wexner incontinence score improved significantly from a median of 16 (10-20) at baseline to 9 (0-14) with right-side stimulation, 10 (0-15) with left-side stimulation and 9 (0-14) with bilateral stimulation. The differences between unilateral right or unilateral left and bilateral stimulation were non-significant, for FI episodes (P = 0.3) or for Wexner incontinence score (P = 0.9).

CONCLUSION

Bilateral SNS therapy for FI is not superior to standard unilateral stimulation in the short term. Equal functional results can be obtained regardless of the side of implantation.

A hyperactive postprandial response in the neorectum--the clue to low anterior resection syndrome after total mesorectal excision surgery?

AIM

To investigate neorectal properties regarding biomechanical, sensory and postprandial response in patients after total mesorectal excision without neoadjuvant radiotherapy in groups of no low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) patients and major LARS patients.

METHOD

Patients without LARS (n = 9) and patients with major LARS (n = 23) were investigated by multimodal rectal stimulation and standard anorectal physiological tests, and results were compared.

RESULTS

Patients with major LARS had an increased postprandial response with a significant increase in pressure in the neorectum after a meal compared with patients without LARS (P = 0.017). No biomechanical differences could be detected.

CONCLUSION

Low anterior resection syndrome seems to be caused by physiological changes due to neural damage more than structural changes in the ano-neorectum.

Sacral nerve stimulation changes rectal sensitivity and biomechanical properties in patients with irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has been demonstrated to alleviate symptoms and improve quality of life in selected patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The mechanisms of action, however, remain unknown. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of SNS on rectal sensitivity and biomechanical properties in patients with IBS.

METHODS

Twenty patients with diarrhea-predominant (n = 11) or mixed (n = 9) IBS were treated with SNS in a controlled, randomized crossover trial. They were randomized to either 1 month of SNS (ON) or placebo (OFF) with the opposite setting for the next month. Sensory and biomechanical parameters were assessed by multimodal rectal stimulation at the end of each period. IBS-specific symptoms were evaluated at baseline and at the end of each treatment period.

KEY RESULTS

Cold stimuli were better tolerated in the ON period (19.9 °C[± 0.6]) compared to the OFF period (21.8 °C[± 0.6]; p = 0.03). Significantly lower cross-sectional areas were needed to elicit sensory responses in the ON period (1545 mm(2) [± 95]) compared to the OFF period (1869 mm(2) [± 92]; p = 0.015). The association between reduced sensory threshold and improvement of constipation was of borderline significance (p = 0.05). Wall stiffness was significantly lower in the ON period (192 mmHg[± 10]) compared to the OFF period (234 mmHg[± 10]; p = 0.004). Reduced wall stiffness was significantly associated with improved overall GSRS-IBS symptom score (p = 0.01). Reduced sensory threshold to stretch (p = 0.02) and reduced wall stiffness (p < 0.001) were predictors of the GSRS-IBS symptom score.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

SNS for diarrhea-predominant and mixed IBS relaxes the rectal wall, while making it more sensitive to stretch and less sensitive to cold. Reduced wall stiffness and increased sensitivity to stretch are associated with improved GSRS-IBS symptom score.

Baseline factors predictive of patient satisfaction with sacral neuromodulation for idiopathic fecal incontinence

PURPOSE

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an established treatment for fecal incontinence (FI). A recent study from our group found that the relationship between patient satisfaction and clinical outcome is complex and does not match the traditional used success criteria. Therefore, the ability to predict patient satisfaction must be given priority. The aim of the present study is to identify baseline factors predictive of patient satisfaction, with SNM, for idiopathic FI.

METHODS

We analyzed data from patients treated with SNM for idiopathic FI in Aarhus, Denmark, and Maastricht, The Netherlands. A questionnaire considering self-reported satisfaction was mailed to these patients and compared to baseline characteristics. Logistic regression was used to determine the predictive value of baseline demographic and diagnostic variables.

RESULTS

In total, 131 patients were included in the analysis. Patient satisfaction with the current treatment result was reported in 75 patients. Fifty-six patients were dissatisfied with SNM treatment, after median 46 months (range 11-122) with permanent implantation. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) was the solely identified predictor for long-term patient satisfaction. A subgroup univariate-logistic regression analysis showed that PNTML ≤ 2.3 ms at the side of lead implantation was a statistically significant predictor for patient satisfaction (odds ratio (OR) 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-5.24, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Baseline PNTML measurement may be predictive of long-term satisfaction with SNM therapy for idiopathic FI. Further studies are needed to confirm this result.

Toward more accurate measurements of anorectal motor and sensory function in routine clinical practice: validation of high-resolution anorectal manometry and Rapid Barostat Bag measurements of rectal function

BACKGROUND

Measurements of anorectal function using high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) and rectal barostat technology provide more reliable results than standard ARM with an elastic balloon; however, HR-ARM results have not been compared to ARM and standard barostat protocols are impractical in routine clinical practice. The aim of this study was to validate HR-ARM against standard ARM and standard barostat against a novel Rapid Barostat Bag (RBB) measurement and elastic balloon measurements of rectal function.

METHODS

Twenty-six healthy volunteers (15 female, 11 male, 19-52 years) were studied. Measurements of anal function and simulated defecation were compared for 12-sensor HR-ARM and 6-sensor standard ARM using line plots from the same recording. Rectal capacity, compliance, and sensation (volume threshold) were measured by elastic balloon, standard barostat, and RBB methods using stepwise inflation of a 700-mL polyethylene bag to 40 mmHg distension by electronic barostat and handheld syringe monitored by sphygmo-manometer, respectively. Results are reported as mean ± SD. Bland-Altman plots and correlation coefficients (r) for measurements were calculated.

KEY RESULTS

There was excellent agreement between HR- and standard ARM measurements (r > 0.86, <25 mmHg difference) and between standard barostat and RBB measurements of rectal capacity (r = 0.97, <25 mL difference). Correlation coefficients of threshold volumes for initial perception, urgency and discomfort were 0.37, 0.71, and 0.95, respectively. No significant correlation was present with elastic balloon measurements. Time to complete studies was shorter for HR-ARM than standard ARM and for RBB than standard barostat in historical controls.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

HR-ARM with RBB measurements of anorectal function provides quick and reasonably accurate measurements of continence function suitable for use in routine clinical practice (ClinicalTrial.gov NCT01456442).

Autonomic rectal dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis and bowel symptoms is secondary to spinal cord disease

BACKGROUND

Most patients with multiple sclerosis report bowel symptoms, but the underlying pathophysiology is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesize that rectal dysfunction in multiple sclerosis is secondary to involvement of the spinal cord by the disease and that this can be measured by assessing rectal compliance.

DESIGN

This was a case-control study.

SETTINGS

The study took place in a neurogastroenterology clinic and tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Forty-five patients with multiple sclerosis, 19 with a spinal cord injury above T5, and 25 normal control subjects were included in this study. Patients with multiple sclerosis were subdivided into 2 groups according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale, below 5 (multiple sclerosis minor disability, n = 25) or above 5 (multiple sclerosis major disability, n = 20), as a reflection of spinal cord involvement.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rectal compliance, Wexner constipation, and Wexner incontinence scores were measured.

RESULTS

Data are presented as mean and SD. Expanded Disability Status Scale correlated with rectal compliance but not with Wexner constipation or Wexner incontinence scores. Post hoc analysis showed no significant difference in Wexner constipation and Wexner incontinence between the 2 multiple sclerosis groups.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations to this study include the lack of an asymptomatic group with multiple sclerosis and the small sample size to evaluate bowel symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Rectal compliance correlates with disability, and observed alterations in the rectal properties are secondary to spinal cord involvement. Our findings suggest that, in patients with neurologic impairment, rectal compliance is a surrogate of reflex activity of the spinal cord regulating rectal function and both a potential predictor of outcome and target for treatment. Multiple sclerosis patient subgroups had similar symptom burden, arguing that bowel dysfunction is multifactorial.

Rectal motility in pediatric constipation

OBJECTIVES

Constipation is a common disorder in children, but little is known about its etiology. Rectal impedance planimetry determines segmental rectal cross-sectional area (CSA) and pressure, allowing detailed description of rectal motility. The aim of the present study was to compare rectal motility in healthy and constipated children.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 10 children (1 girl) with constipation according to the Rome III criteria, mean age 8.8 years (standard deviation ± 1.2), and 10 healthy children (5 girls), mean age 9.9 years (standard deviation ± 1.5). CSA was determined at 3 levels (4, 5.5, and 7 cm from the anal verge). The resting rectal motility was recorded for 30 minutes followed by a distension protocol to assess compliance. Runs of phasic rectal contractions were defined as changes of >10% from baseline CSA and lasting at least 2 minutes. Rectal dimensions were expressed as mean CSA.

RESULTS

A low-amplitude contraction pattern (3%-5% of baseline CSA) with a frequency of 6 to 8/minute was present in all of the children. There was significantly more time with phasic rectal contractions in constipated children (median 38%, range [0-100]) compared with healthy children (median 8.8%, range [0-57]) (P < 0.05). The rectal CSA was higher in constipated children (median 1802 mm [range 1106-2948]) compared with healthy children (1375 mm [range 437-1861]) (P < 0.05), but compliance did not differ (constipated: median 38 mm/H2O [range 12-86] vs healthy 33 mm/H2O [range 10-63]) (P = 30).

CONCLUSIONS

In children with constipation, we found phasic rectal contractions for a significantly longer period compared with healthy children, and their rectum is larger than normal.

Neorectal hyposensitivity after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer has a detrimental effect on long-term anorectal function and quality of life, additional to that observed after rectal resection. The exact physiological mechanisms for the excess impairment remain unknown. We aimed to investigate neorectal and anal sphincter properties in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NT) prior to total mesorectal excision (TME).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixteen patients (NT+ patients) were examined by multimodal neorectal stimulation and standard anorectal physiological testing. Data were compared to the results of 23 patients, who underwent TME without NT (NT- patients).

RESULTS

NT+ patients had elevated sensory thresholds to heat (median temperature, 60 vs. 55 °C; p<0.01) and mechanical distension (median tension, 2513 vs. 1521 mmHg mm; p=0.05) in the fasting state, and altered perception of the sensory response to heat (p=0.01) and cold (p=0.01) compared to NT- patients. No differences in the biomechanical properties of the neorectal wall were detected. Anal resting pressure was lower in NT+ patients compared to NT- patients (median pressure, 31 vs. 45 cm H2O; p=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic radiotherapy causes neorectal hyposensitivity to mechanical and thermal stimuli in patients receiving NT prior to TME surgery for rectal cancer, possibly due to impaired afferent nerve function.

Sacral nerve stimulation at subsensory threshold does not compromise treatment efficacy: results from a randomized, blinded crossover study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

: Stimulation amplitude used in sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is at or just above the sensory threshold (ST). This randomized, blinded crossover study aimed to document if stimulation at 75% or 50% of the ST would be as effective as stimulation at the ST for fecal incontinence (FI).

METHOD

: FI patients treated with SNS, who were satisfied with current treatment results and had a minimum symptom reduction of 75%, were eligible. Patients were randomized into 3 periods of 4-week stimulation: ST, 75% of the ST, and 50% of the ST. Patients completed a bowel habit diary and questionnaires on bowel functions and patient satisfaction at the study baseline and in each study period.

RESULTS

: Nineteen patients (18 females) with a mean follow-up of 51.7 ± 29.9 months were included from January to April 2010. The mean FI episodes per 3 weeks decreased from pre-SNS therapy 33.6 ± 31.6 to 1.1 ± 2.2 at the study baseline (P < 0.001). Decreasing the stimulation amplitude to as low as 50% of the ST did not affect the overall number of incontinent episodes (P = 0.078). The Wexner incontinence score dropped from 16.5 ± 2.5 for pre-SNS therapy to 7.4 ± 3.1 at the study baseline (P < 0.001). Decreasing the stimulation amplitude to ST, 75% of the ST or 50% of the ST, did not change the Wexner score when compared with the study baseline (P = 0.581). In general, patient satisfaction was high at the study baseline and did not deteriorate as the stimulation amplitude was decreased to 50% of the ST (P = 0.932).

CONCLUSIONS

: Subsensory stimulation as low as 50% of the ST is as effective as stimulation at or above the ST. The study was approved by the Regional Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics, Denmark, and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01130870).

Functional luminal imaging probe: a new technique for dynamic evaluation of mechanical properties of the anal canal

BACKGROUND

The muscle structures surrounding the anal canal are of major importance in maintaining continence but their anatomy and function vary along its length. Standard manometry does not provide detailed information about mechanical properties of the anal canal. A new functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) has been developed for this purpose. The aim of our study was to investigate whether FLIP allows detailed evaluation of dynamic biomechanical properties along the length of the anal canal.

METHODS

The in vitro validity and reproducibility of the FLIP system were tested. Fifteen healthy volunteers (age 32-65 years, mean 51 years), of whom 12 were females, were investigated. The integrity and dimensions of the anal sphincter apparatus were evaluated with endoanal ultrasonography and standard anal manometry. During standardized distensions with the FLIP, 16 cross-sectional areas of the anal canal were measured at 5-mm intervals. Distensibility of the following three segments was evaluated: upper anal canal (surrounded by the internal anal sphincter and the puborectalis muscle), mid-anal canal (surrounded by the internal anal sphincter and the external anal sphincter) and lower anal canal (surrounded by the external anal sphincter). Color contour plots were generated from the FLIP-based dynamic recordings of serial cross-sections.

RESULTS

In vitro tests confirmed the validity and reproducibility of the FLIP system. The luminal geometry during distension and the biomechanical properties of the anal canal differed at the three levels. Both at rest and during squeeze the mid-anal canal was significantly less distensible than the upper (p < 0.01) and the lower (p < 0.05) anal canal.

CONCLUSIONS

FLIP is a promising method for evaluation of the nonhomogeneous biomechanical properties along the length of the anal canal.

Acute effect of electrical stimulation of the dorsal genital nerve on rectal capacity in patients with spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND

Constipation and fecal incontinence are considerable problems for most individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Neurogenic bowel symptoms are caused by several factors including abnormal rectal wall properties. Stimulation of the dorsal genital nerve (DGN) can inhibit bladder contractions and because of common innervation inhibitory effects are anticipated in the rectum too. Therefore, DNG could have a future role in the treatment of neurogenic fecal incontinence.

AIM

To study the effect of acute DGN stimulation on the rectal cross sectional area (CSA) in SCI patients.

METHODS

Seven patients with complete supraconal SCI (median age 50 years) were included. Stimulation was applied via plaster-electrodes using an amplitude of twice the genito-anal reflex threshold (pulse width: 200 μs; pulse rate: 20 Hz). A pressure controlled phasic (10, 20 and 30 cmH(2)O) rectal distension protocol was repeated four times with subjects randomized to stimulation during 1st and 3rd distension series or 2nd and 4th distension series. The rectal CSA and pressure were measured using impedance planimetry and manometry.

RESULTS

All patients completed the investigation. Median stimulation amplitude was 51 mA (range 30-64). CSA was smaller during stimulation and differences reached statistical significance at distension pressures of 20 cmH(2)O (average decrease 9%; P = 0.02) and 30 cmH(2)O (average decrease 4%; P = 0.03) above resting rectal pressure. Accordingly, rectal pressure-CSA relation was significantly reduced during stimulation at 20 (P=0.03) and 30 cmH(2)O distension (P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

DGN Stimulation in patients with supraconal SCI results in an acute decrease of rectal CSA and the rectal pressure-CSA relation.

Alternative procedure to shorten rectal barostat procedure for the assessment of rectal compliance and visceral perception: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Barostat methodology is widely used for assessing visceral perception. Different barostat protocols are described with respect to the measurement of rectal compliance and visceral perception. The choice of protocols affects the duration, which is normally 60-90 min, and accuracy of the procedure. This study aimed to shorten the procedure by using the semi-random distension protocol for both compliance and visceral perception measurement and a correction based on rectal capacity (RC) instead of minimal distension pressure (MDP).

METHODS

Twelve irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients (7 females) and 11 healthy controls (8 females) underwent a barostat procedure. Compliance was determined during both a staircase distension and a semi-random protocol. Visceral perception data were compared as a function of pressure or relative volume, corrected for MDP or RC, respectively.

RESULTS

Compliance measurement using the semi-random protocol instead of the staircase distension protocol resulted in an overestimation in healthy volunteers, but not in IBS patients. The overall conclusion that IBS patients had a lower compliance compared to controls was not different between protocols. Data presentation of the visceral perception scores as a function of corrected volume instead of pressures corrected for MDP did not alter the conclusion that sensation scores in IBS patients were higher as compared to healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that barostat procedures may be shortened by approximately 20 min, without losing the ability to discriminate between healthy controls and IBS patients. A correction for RC instead of MDP may improve the accuracy of the procedure.

Temporary sacral nerve stimulation alters rectal sensory function: a physiological study

BACKGROUND

The indications for sacral nerve stimulation are increasing, but the mechanism remains poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the effect of sacral nerve stimulation on rectal compliance and rectal sensory function.

DESIGN

This was a prospective study.

SETTINGS

This study took place at a university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty-three consecutive consenting patients (22 female; median age, 49 y) undergoing temporary sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence were prospectively studied. Clinical response was assessed by the use of bowel diaries and Wexner scores.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Anal manometry, rectal compliance, volume and pressure thresholds to rectal distension (barostat), and rectal Doppler mucosal blood flow were measured before and at the end of stimulation.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (70%) had a favorable clinical response. Median anal squeeze pressures increased with stimulation from 40 (range, 6-156) cmH2O to 64 (range, 16-243) cmH2O. Median rectal compliance did not significantly change with stimulation (prestimulation: 11.5 (range, 7.9-21.8) mL/mmHg, poststimulation: 12.4 (range, 6.2-22) mL/mmHg, P = .941). Rectal wall pressures associated with urge (baseline: 15.4 (range, 11-26.7) mmHg, poststimulation: 19 (range, 11.1-42.7) mmHg, P = .054) and maximal tolerated thresholds (baseline: 21.6 (8.5-31.9) mmHg, poststimulation: 27.1 (14.3-43.3) mmHg, P = .023) significantly increased after stimulation. Rectal Doppler mucosal blood flow did not significantly change with stimulation (baseline: 125.8 (69.9-346.8), poststimulation: 112.4 (50.2-404.1), P = .735). Changes in anal resting pressure and rectal wall pressures with stimulation were evident only in responders; however, changes in anal squeeze pressures were evident in both responders and nonresponders.

LIMITATIONS

The study reports results following short-term stimulation in a small but homogenous group of patients. A larger long-term study will follow.

CONCLUSION

Temporary sacral nerve stimulation does not change rectal compliance, but is associated with significant changes to the pressure thresholds of rectal distension. This, together with the observation that outcome is not related to sphincter integrity, supports the hypothesis of an afferent-mediated mechanism of action.

The acute effect of dorsal genital nerve stimulation on rectal wall properties in patients with idiopathic faecal incontinence

AIM

Faecal continence depends on several factors, including rectal wall properties. Stimulation of the dorsal genital nerve (DGN) can suppress bladder contraction and similar effects are anticipated for the rectum. In this study, the acute effect of DGN stimulation on the rectal cross-sectional area is investigated.

METHOD

Ten female patients (median age 60 years) with idiopathic faecal incontinence were included in the study. Stimulation was applied via plaster electrodes with the maximum tolerable amplitude (pulse width was 200 μs at a pulse rate of 20 Hz). Three series of pressure-controlled phasic (10, 20 and 30 cm H(2) O) and stepwise (5-30 cm H(2) O in steps of 5 cm H(2) O) rectal distensions were conducted (unstimulated, stimulated, unstimulated), and the rectal cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured with impedance planimetry.

RESULTS

All patients completed the investigation. The median stimulation amplitude was 21 (8.5-27) mA. Comparing stimulated with unstimulated phasic distension, there was no significant difference in the median rectal CSA. Comparing stimulated with unstimulated stepwise distension, there was no significant difference in the median rectal CSA. Neither the rectal pressure-CSA relationship (CSA/P(R) ) nor the rectal wall tension changed during stimulation.

CONCLUSION

No acute effect on rectal CSA during pressure-controlled distension was demonstrated during DGN stimulation.

Rectal motility in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence: a study with impedance planimetry

INTRODUCTION

Most patients with fecal incontinence have poor anal sphincter function. In patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence no structural abnormality can be identified. The aim of the present study was to compare rectal motility patterns in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence and in healthy controls.

METHODS

Rectal impedance planimetry provides simultaneous measurement of rectal pressure, anal pressure, and rectal cross-sectional area at 5 levels. This allows highly detailed description of rectoanal motility. In 12 female patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence (mean age, 64.5) and 12 healthy controls (mean age, 47; 12 females) rectal phasic activity and tone were studied at a distension pressure 10 cm H2O above basic rectal pressure for one hour during fast and one hour after the meal.

RESULTS

The median rectal cross-sectional area during fast was 3178 mm2 (range, 1905-4095) in patients with fecal incontinence and 2907 mm2 (range, 1832-4195) in the control group (P = .42). The postprandial decrease in rectal cross-sectional area was significantly more pronounced in patients (median postprandial reduction 462 mm2 (range, 3124 reduction to 7 increase)) than in the control group (median postprandial change 33 mm2 (range, 844 reduction to 974 increase)) (P = .007). The number of anal sampling reflexes during fast was reduced in patients (P = .03) and rectal wall tension during anal sampling reflexes also tended to be lower (P = .07). No differences in other phasic rectal motility patterns were found.

CONCLUSION

Idiopathic fecal incontinence is associated with enhanced postprandial increase in rectal tone and a reduced frequency of anal sampling reflexes.

Six years of experience with sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence

PURPOSE

Sacral nerve stimulation is one of many new surgical modalities for fecal incontinence. Short-term results from sacral nerve stimulation have been more encouraging than those from other modalities. The aim of this study was to report the outcome of percutaneous nerve evaluation tests and sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence from a single center covering a period of 6 years since the procedure was introduced.

METHODS

All of the candidates for a percutaneous nerve evaluation test and sacral nerve stimulation seen at our anal physiology unit between March 2001 and March 2007 were included in the study.

RESULTS

A total of 177 patients with fecal incontinence (160 females), median age 59.5 (range, 27-88) years, underwent a percutaneous nerve evaluation test. Of these patients, 142 (80%) had a positive test, including 21 of 25 (84%) patients who required a repeat percutaneous nerve evaluation test. Because of a functional failure, 16 patients underwent a revision of the permanent electrode, 7 of whom (44%) were satisfied with the functional result after the revision. Of 126 patients, 15 (12%) have undergone an explantation, with an infection rate of only 1.6%. Overall, after a median follow-up of 24 (range, 3-72) months, the median Wexner incontinence score decreased from 16 (range, 6-20) to 10 (range, 0-20) (P < .0001). In the 10 patients who underwent at least 6 years of treatment, the effect was sustained, as the median Wexner incontinence score decreased from 20 (range, 12-20) to 7 (range, 2-11) (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Sacral nerve stimulation is a simple, safe, and minimally invasive technique with low morbidity and excellent results, which appear to be maintained for the first 6 years after the procedure. For patients who underwent the treatment, median Wexner incontinence score decreased significantly after a median follow-up of 24 (range, 3-72) months. Twelve percent were explanted. The infection rate was 1.6%.

The role of pouch compliance measurement in the management of pouch dysfunction

PURPOSE

Ileal pouch anal anastomosis is an established option for patients who require total proctocolectomy and restoration of bowel continuity. However, the functional results are not always good and low pouch compliance has been suggested as one possible cause. We aimed to review the results of pouch compliance tests over 11 years to assess whether measuring pouch compliance is a useful diagnostic tool to guide management of pouch dysfunction.

METHODS

The results of pouch compliance tests performed between 1996 and 2007 together with the details of symptoms, treatments and outcome were reviewed.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-one pouch compliance tests were performed. There was no difference in pouch compliance between those with overt pathology (pouchitis, pelvic sepsis or anastomotic stricture) and those with idiopathic pouch dysfunction. In this second group, there was no difference in pouch compliance between patients with and without each of the symptoms of increased defaecatory frequency, incontinence and evacuation difficulties. The results of the compliance testing did not influence the clinical decision making on idiopathic pouch dysfunction (p=0.77) nor diverted pouches (p=0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring pouch compliance does not offer new information accounting for idiopathic pouch dysfunction and has little influence on the clinical management.

Anorectal manometry with water-perfused catheter in healthy adults with no functional bowel disorders

Anorectal manometry provides an objective assessment of anal sphincter pressure and rectal sensitivity and anorectal reflexes in response to distension. However, its clinical utility is hampered by a lack of standardized protocols and normative data from healthy subjects. Previous studies have used water-perfused systems in normal subjects, but some adopted a rapid pull-through technique; others did not evaluate rectal sensations and others did not carefully exclude patients with functional bowel disorders. Objective To evaluate anorectal function in healthy adults without functional bowel disorders, using a water-perfused system with the stationary technique in order to obtain normative values for anorectal manometry. Method Fifty-two healthy volunteers with no Rome II diagnostic criteria for functional bowel disorders, including only nulliparous women, underwent anorectal manometry with a water-perfused system, according to a standardized protocol. Results Maximum squeeze pressure of the anal sphincter as well as the area under the pressure-time curve during squeeze was significantly lower in women than men (P < 0.01), while sphincter length, resting pressure, volume thresholds for reflex inhibitory recto-anal and rectal sensations were similar. Conclusions This study describes a protocol for stationary anorectal manometry using a water-perfused system, and a method for analysing the various parameters obtained during the procedure, as recently suggested in the international literature. It supplies normative data obtained in a population of healthy subjects including nulliparous women, with no functional bowel disorders.

Rectal motility after sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is effective against faecal incontinence, but the mode of action is obscure. The aim of this study was to describe the effects of SNS on fasting and postprandial rectal motility. Sixteen patients, 14 women age 33-73 (mean 58), with faecal incontinence of various aetiologies were examined. Before and during SNS, rectal cross-sectional area (CSA) and ano-rectal pressures were determined with impedance planimetry and manometry for 1 h during fast and 1 h postprandially. Neither in the fasting state nor postprandially did SNS affect the number of single rectal contractions, total time with cyclic rectal contractions, the number of aborally and orally propagating contractions, the number of anal sampling reflexes or rectal wall tension during contractions. Postprandial changes in rectal tone were significantly reduced during SNS (P < 0.02). Before SNS, median rectal CSA was 2999 mm(2) (range: 1481-3822) during fast and 2697 mm(2) (range: 1227-3310) postprandially (P < 0.01). During SNS, median rectal CSA was 2990 mm(2) (1823-3678) during fast and 2547 mm(2) (1831-3468) postprandially (P = 0.22). SNS for faecal incontinence does not affect phasic rectal motility but it impairs postprandial changes in rectal tone.

Pathophysiology of evacuation disorders

This review details our contemporary knowledge of the mechanisms underlying evacuatory disorders. There is confusion concerning terminology and classification, which is based upon both an incomplete understanding of the multiple mechanisms involved in evacuation, and that current tests to investigate it are not physiological. Nevertheless, despite the need for more research, significant advances have been made and current assessments can direct therapy.

Manometric, sensorimotor, and neurophysiologic evaluation of anorectal function

With advances in diagnostic technology, it is now accepted that in the field of functional bowel disorders, symptom-based assessment is unsatisfactory as the sole means of directing therapy. A robust taxonomy based on underlying pathophysiology has been suggested, highlighting a crucial role for physiologic testing in clinical practice. A wide number of complementary investigations currently exist for the assessment of anorectal structure and function, some of which have a clinical impact in patients with functional disorders of evacuation and continence by markedly improving diagnostic yield and altering management. The techniques, limitations, measurements, and clinical use of manometric, sensorimotor, and neurophysiologic tests of anorectal function are presented.

Effect of duodenal glucose and acute hyperglycemia on rectal perception and compliance in response to tension-controlled rectal distension in healthy humans

BACKGROUND

Acute changes in blood glucose concentration affect gastrointestinal motor and sensory function. Tone and distensibility contribute to intact rectal function.

AIMS

To test the effects of duodenal glucose (euglycemic hyperinsulinemia), intravenous glucose (hyperglycemic hyperinsulinemia), and saline (euglycemic normoinsulinemia as control) on rectal perception and compliance in response to tension-controlled rectal distension.

METHODS

During duodenal glucose at 2 kcal min(-1), marked hyperglycemic clamp (approximately 13 mmol L(-1)), or saline as control, responses to fixed-tension rectal distension, applied by means of a computerized tensostat, were compared randomized on three separate days in eight healthy subjects.

RESULTS

At discomfort level (score 3 on the 0-4 rectal score scale), perception of rectal distension was significantly higher during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia (45 +/- 3 g cm(-2) tolerance) and significantly lower during hyperglycemia (83 +/- 4 g cm(-2) tolerance), both reaching significance versus control (64 +/- 6 g cm(-2) tolerance; P < 0.05). At this level, no relevant variations of rectal compliance were seen, which were 10.3 +/- 1 mL mmHg(-1) during duodenal glucose, 9.5 +/- 1 mL mmHg(-1) for the group with hyperglycemia, and 9.7 +/- 2 mL mmHg(-1) for the control.

CONCLUSION

Duodenal glucose provokes rectal hypersensitivity whereas acute hyperglycemia contributes to rectal hyposensitivity. Despite different rectal tenso-sensitivity, rectal compliance remains virtually unchanged. Any dysfunction may cause rectal complaints.

Compliance and capacity of the normal human rectum--physical considerations and measurement pitfalls

The assessment of parameters which adequately represent rectal and neorectal compliance is complex. Biological properties of the rectum during distension and relaxation show significant departures from in vitro physical compliance measurements; as much dependent upon the viscoelastic charateristics of hollow organ deformation as upon the technique of compliance calculation. This review discusses the pressure/volume characteristics of importance in the rectum during distension from a bioengineering perspective and outlines the disparities of such measurements in living biological systems. Techniques and pitfalls of newer methods to assess rectal wall stiffness (impedance planimetry and barostat measurement) are discussed.

Impedance planimetric description of normal rectoanal motility in humans

PURPOSE

Manometry and pressure-volume measurements are commonly used to study anorectal physiology. However, the methods are limited by several sources of error. Recently, a new impedance planimetric system has been introduced in a porcine model. It allows simultaneous determination of anorectal pressures and multiple rectal luminal cross-sectional areas. This study was designed to study normal human rectoanal motility by means of impedance planimetry with multiple rectal cross-sectional areas and rectal and anal pressure.

METHODS

Twelve healthy volunteers (10 females), aged 24 to 53 years, were studied during one-hour fasting and one hour after a meal. Rectal cross-sectional areas were determined at five levels each 2 cm apart, as well as rectal and anal pressure.

RESULTS

A number of rectoanal motility patterns were observed. A total of 25 episodes with very localized cyclic rectal contractions detected at only one of five channels were observed lasting two to four minutes with a median frequency of three per minute (range, 2-6). A total of 44 episodes of cyclic rectal contractions propagating over two or more channels were detected lasting 2 to 36 minutes. Most were associated with contractions of the anal canal. A significant increase in rectal contractile activity was observed after the meal (P < 0.05). Single rectal contractions were observed in 11 subjects, and the majority were located to one channel and lasted less than 40 seconds. In two subjects who felt a need to defecate during the experiment, the cross-sectional area at all channels showed strong cyclic contractile activity and the anal pressure increased by approximately 100 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

The new rectal impedance planimetry system allows highly detailed description of rectoanal motility patterns. It has promise as a new method for description of rectoanal motility in further studies.

Rectal volume tolerability and anal pressures in patients with fecal incontinence treated with sacral nerve stimulation

PURPOSE

Sacral nerve stimulation has proven to be a promising treatment for fecal incontinence when conventional treatment modalities have failed. There have been several hypotheses concerning the mode of action of sacral nerve stimulation, but the mechanism is still unclear. This study was designed to evaluate the results of rectal volume tolerability, rectal pressure-volume curves, and anal pressures before and six months after permanent sacral nerve stimulation and to investigate the mode of action of sacral nerve stimulation.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with incontinence (male/female ratio = 6/23; median age, 58 (range, 29-79) years) underwent implantation of a permanent sacral electrode and neurostimulator after a positive percutaneous nerve evaluation test. Wexner incontinence score, rectal distention with thresholds for "first sensation," "desire to defecate," and "maximal tolerable volume," rectal pressure-volume curves, anal resting pressure, and maximum squeeze pressure were evaluated at baseline and at six months follow-up.

RESULTS

Median Wexner incontinence score decreased from 16 (range, 6-20) to 4 (range, 0-12; P < 0. 0001). Median "first sensation" increased from 43 (range, 16-230) ml to 62 (range, 4-186) ml (P = 0.1), median "desire to defecate" from 70 (range, 30-443) ml to 98 (range, 30-327) ml (P = 0.011), and median "maximal tolerable volume" from 130 (range, 68-667) ml to 166 (range, 74-578) ml (P = 0.031). Rectal pressure-volume curves showed a significant increase in rectal capacity (P < 0.0001). The anal resting pressure increased significantly from 31 (range, 0-109) cm H(2)O to 38 (range, 0-111) cm H(2)O (P = 0.045). No significant increase in maximum squeeze pressure was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with fecal incontinence successfully treated with sacral nerve stimulation, there was a significant increase in rectal volume tolerability and rectal capacity. A significant increase in anal resting pressure, but not in maximum squeeze pressure, was found. We suggest that sacral nerve stimulation causes neuromodulation at spinal level.

Investigation and treatment of faecal incontinence

Faecal incontinence is a debilitating condition affecting people of all ages, and significantly impairs quality of life. Proper clinical assessment followed by conservative medical therapy leads to improvement in more than 50% of cases, including patients with severe symptoms. Patients with advanced incontinence or those resistant to initial treatment should be evaluated by anorectal physiology testing to establish the severity and type of incontinence. Several treatment options with promising results exist. Patients with gross sphincter defects should undergo surgical repair. Those who fail to respond to sphincteroplasty and those with no anatomical defects have the option of either sacral nerve stimulation or other advanced procedures. Stoma formation should be reserved for patients who do not respond to any of the above procedures.

Barostat measurement of rectal compliance and capacity

PURPOSE

Fecal continence requires relaxation of the rectal wall and a reservoir of adequate capacity. Rectal compliance provides an assessment of rectal wall stiffness; however, compliance is also affected by rectal capacity. We developed and validated a barostat measurement of rectal capacity. By accounting for variation in rectal capacity, we aimed to improve the inconsistent relationship between rectal compliance, sensation, and continence reported in the literature.

METHOD

Barostat measurements of rectal compliance and capacity were validated in 41 healthy, continent subjects. Slow staircase (0-40 mmHg) and rapid phasic (12-40 mmHg) distentions were performed on two separate days, filling sensations were assessed by visual analog score. A stool substitute retention test of rectal filling sensation and continence was performed.

RESULTS

Variance of volume measurements decreased with pressure comparing conditioning vs. index distentions, staircase vs. phasic distentions, and measurements on different days (all P < 0.001). Correction for rectal capacity measured at 40 mmHg reduced the "normal range" of compliance measurements (P < 0.01) but not vice versa. Compared with unadjusted volume measurements, normalized rectal volume (percentage filling relative to rectal capacity) improved the description of rectal sensation visual analog score (P < 0.01). Rectal capacity correlated with filling sensations and the volume retained on retention testing (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Barostat measurements of rectal capacity at 40 mmHg are highly reproducible and not affected by distention protocol. The assessment of rectal capacity complements that of rectal compliance. Correction for rectal capacity provides an assessment of rectal wall stiffness independent of rectal geometry and improves the association of barostat volume measurements with rectal sensitivity and continence.

Ano-rectal motility responses to pelvic, hypogastric and pudendal nerve stimulation in the Göttingen minipig

We investigated the effect of efferent stimulation of the pelvic (PN), hypogastric (HGN) and pudendal (PuN) nerves on ano-rectal motility in Göttingen minipigs using an impedance planimetry probe. Changes in the rectal cross-sectional area (CSA) at five axial positions and pressures in the rectum and anal canal were investigated simultaneously. Pelvic nerve stimulation elicited a CSA decrease in the proximal part of the rectum and a simultaneous CSA increase in its distal part. Anal pressure also decreased. Hypogastric nerve and PuN stimulation elicited an increase in anal pressure, but no rectal response. Severing the HGN produced a persistent reduction in resting anal pressure, but no change was observed when the PN and the PuN were severed. Stimulation of the distal part of all three nerves produced a persistent response. Administration of phentolamine and pancouronium eliminated the response to stimulation of the HGN and the PuN, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Rectal responses to PN stimulation vary more than previously suggested. The HGN has an excitatory effect on the internal anal sphincter, and the PuN on the external anal sphincter. However, the PuN plays no major role in maintaining basal anal pressure.

Long-term anorectal dysfunction after postoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of rectal cancer has been shown to increase long-term morbidity causing severe anorectal dysfunction with physiologic changes whose interaction remains poorly understood. This study examines long-term anorectal morbidity from adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy.

METHODS

In a prospective study, patients with Dukes B or C rectal carcinoma were randomized to postoperative radiotherapy or no adjuvant treatment after anterior resection. The long-term effect of radiotherapy on anorectal function in a subset of surviving patients was assessed from a questionnaire on subjective symptoms and from physiology laboratory evaluation and flexible sigmoidoscopy.

RESULTS

Twelve of 15 patients (80 percent) treated with radiotherapy had increased bowel frequency compared with 3 of the 13 patients (23 percent) who did not have radiation therapy (P = 0.003). The former group had loose or liquid stool more often (60 vs. 23 percent, P = 0.05), had fecal incontinence more often (60 vs. 8 percent, P = 0.004), and wore pad more often (47 vs. 0 percent, P = 0.004). They also experienced fecal urgency and were unable to differentiate stool from gas more often. Endoscopy revealed a pale and atrophied mucosa and telangiectasias in the irradiated patients. Anorectal physiology showed a reduced rectal capacity (146 vs. 215 ml, P = 0.03) and maximum squeeze pressure (59 vs. 93 cm H2O, P = 0.003) in the radiotherapy group. Impedance planimetry demonstrated a reduced rectal distensibility in these patients (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy after anterior resection causes severe long-term anorectal dysfunction, which is mainly the result of a weakened, less sensitive anal sphincter and an undistensible rectum with reduced capacity.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the rectum during distension

PURPOSE

A knowledge of the relationships between the rectum and its surrounding structures during distention may improve our understanding of the results of studies assessing rectal sensory-motor responses to distention. This magnetic resonance imaging study was designed to assess the shape of the rectum and the degree of distention at which the surrounding structures are compressed.

METHODS

Nine healthy patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the rectum under resting conditions and after the inflation of a plastic bag to volumes of 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 ml. The thickness of the rectovesical space was assessed as a measure of the compression of the perirectal structures, and the perception of sensations were recorded.

RESULTS

The shape of the rectum changed from being quasicylindrical at distention volumes of <100 ml to bean-shaped at larger volumes. The thickness of the rectovesical space at a distention volume of 50 ml was the same as when the bag was not inflated, but it progressively decreased until the difference became statistically significant at distention volumes of > or = 200 ml, corresponding to a mean +/- standard deviation rectal radius of 2.66 +/- 0.37 cm. Statistically significant compression of the rectovesical space was recorded when the sensations of gas, desire to defecate, and urgency were perceived.

CONCLUSIONS

The shape of the rectum changes during distention; it significantly compresses the extrarectal structures in the tested range of distention that induces non-painful sensations. Magnetic resonance imaging is a useful means of assessing the morphologic changes in the rectum during distention.

Measurement of mechanical properties of rectal wall

In this paper, a pig's rectum was studied as a model biomaterial and its mechanical behaviors under tensile, compressive, and shear stresses were measured accurately using a multipurpose microtesting system. Based on the stress-strain relations of samples of different orientations, the tangential moduli were calculated through a reverse method combined with self-correlation analysis. The experimental data exhibited pronounced nonlinear and anisotropic characteristics. It was found that the effective compliance in tension along the longitudinal direction was larger than that along the circumferential direction, but smaller than that along the out-of-plane direction.

Rectal hyposensitivity: a disorder of the rectal wall or the afferent pathway? An assessment using the barostat

OBJECTIVES

Rectal hyposensitivity (RH) relates to a diminished perception of rectal distension. Diagnosis on the basis of abnormal threshold volumes on balloon distension alone may be inaccurate due to the influence of differing rectal wall properties. The aim of this study was to investigate whether RH was actually due to impaired afferent nerve function or whether it could be secondary to abnormalities of the rectal wall.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients were referred consecutively to a tertiary referral unit for physiologic assessment of constipation (Rome II criteria), 25 of whom had associated fecal incontinence. Thirty patients had RH (elevated threshold volumes on latex balloon distension), and 20 patients had normal rectal sensation (NS). Results were compared with those obtained in 20 healthy volunteers (HV). All subjects underwent standard anorectal physiologic investigation, and assessment of rectal compliance, adaptive response to isobaric distension at urge threshold, and postprandial rectal response, using an electromechanical barostat.

RESULTS

Mean rectal compliance was significantly elevated in patients with RH compared to NS and HV (p < 0.001). However, 16 patients with RH (53%) had normal compliance. Intensity of the urge to defecate during random phasic isobaric distensions was significantly reduced in patients with RH compared to NS and HV (p < 0.001). The adaptive response at urge threshold was reduced in patients with RH compared to NS and HV (p < 0.001), although spontaneous adaptation at operating pressure was similar in all three groups studied (p= 0.3). Postprandially, responses were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients found to have RH on simple balloon distension, impaired perception of rectal distension may be partly explained in one subgroup by abnormal rectal compliance. However, a second subgroup exists with normal rectal wall properties, suggestive of a true impairment of the afferent pathway. The barostat has an important role in the identification of these subgroups of patients.

New probe for the measurement of dynamic changes in the rectum

Conventional mano-volumetric techniques cannot measure changes in circumferential dimensions at several axial positions within a bowel segment. Our aims were to validate a new impedance planimetry probe for simultaneously measuring the cross-sectional area (CSA) at five axial positions in vitro and in vivo in 10 anesthetized pigs. The day-to-day coefficient of variation (CV) for CSA measured by the probe in cylindrical tubes of known diameter was 0.8-9.5%. The mean from actual diameter deviation ranged from 2.3 to 6.7%. In a conical tube the day-to-day CV was 2.3-8% and mean percentage deviation -2.8 to 1.0. Interposed narrowing sections caused a total CV of 7-13%. In vivo studies revealed variations in CSA, associated with expulsion of flatus. It is concluded that impedance planimetry allows simultaneous measurement of CSA at several levels within the rectum. In vitro validity was acceptable and alterations in lumen diameter were identified in vivo.