Can laparoscopy reduce hospital stay in the treatment of Crohn's disease?

A scoring system to predict a prolonged length of stay after surgery for Crohn's disease

AIM

Many factors influence the postoperative length of stay (LOS) in Crohn's disease (CD). This study aims to identify the factors associated with a prolonged LOS after ileocolic resection (ICR) for CD and to develop a scoring system to predict the postoperative LOS in CD.

METHOD

Patient data were collected from St Marks Hospital, London, UK, and the Humanitas Clinical and Research Center Milan, Italy, for all patients who underwent an ICR for CD from 2005 to 2017. Logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis. The scoring system was developed from the logistic regression model. The performance of the scoring system was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

A total of 628 surgeries were included in the analysis. Eighty eight surgeries were excluded due to missing data. The remaining 543 were divided into two cohorts for the development (n = 418) and validation (n = 125) of the scoring system. The regression model was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The statistically significant independent variables included the time since diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, perioperative use of steroids, surgical access, strictureplasty and platelet count. The AUROCs for the development and validation cohorts were 0.732 and 0.7, respectively (p < 0.0001). The cut-off score suggested by Youden's index was 50, with a sensitivity of 65.6% and a specificity of 73.3%.

CONCLUSION

The time since diagnosis, ASA grade, steroid use, surgical access, strictureplasty and platelet count were associated with a prolonged LOS and were used to develop a scoring system. The calculator is available online at https://rebrand.ly/Crohnscal.

Emergency laparoscopic ileo-colic resection and primary intracorporeal anastomosis for Crohn's acute ileitis with free perforation and faecal peritonitis: first ever reported laparoscopic treatment

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopy for abdominal surgical emergencies is gaining increasing acceptance given the spreading of advanced laparoscopic skills among modern surgeons, as it may allow at the same time an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment of acute abdomen. The use of the laparoscopic approach also in case of diffuse peritonitis is now becoming accepted provided hemodynamic stability, despite the common belief in the past decades that such severe condition represented an indication for conversion to open surgery or an immediate contraindication to continue laparoscopy. Crohn's Disease (CD) is a rare cause of acute abdomen and peritonitis, only a few cases of CD acute perforations are reported in the published literature; these cases have always been approached and treated by open laparotomy.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We report on a case of a faecal peritonitis due to an acute perforation caused by a terminal ileitis in an undiagnosed CD. The patient underwent diagnostic laparoscopy followed by a laparoscopic ileo-colic resection and primary intracorporeal anastomosis, with a successful postoperative outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Complicated CD has to be considered within the possible causes of small bowel non-traumatic perforation. Emergency laparoscopy with resection and primary intra-corporeal anastomosis can be feasible and may be a safe and effective minimally invasive alternative to open surgery even in case of faecal peritonitis, in selected stable patients and in presence of appropriate laparoscopic colorectal surgical skills and experience. To the best of our knowledge the present experience is the first ever reported case managed with a totally laparoscopic extended ileocecal resection with intracorporeal anastomosis in case of acutely perforated CD and diffuse peritonitis.

Laparoscopy in Crohn's disease

In Crohn's disease (CD) surgical management, laparoscopic approach offers several theoretical advantages over the open approach. However, the importance of inflammatory lesions associated with CD, and the frequent presence of adhesions from previous surgery have initially questioned its feasibility and safety. In the present review article we will discuss the role of laparoscopic approach for Crohn's disease surgical management, along with its potential benefits as compared to the open approach.

Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis of perioperative complications and long term outcomes compared with open surgery

Background

Previous meta-analyses have had conflicting conclusions regarding the differences between laparoscopic and open techniques in patients with Crohn’s Disease. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare outcomes in patients with Crohn’s disease undergoing laparoscopic or open surgical resection.

Methods

A literature search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the US National Institute of Health’s Clinical Trials Registry was completed. Randomized clinical trials and non-randomized comparative studies were included if laparoscopic and open surgical resections were compared. Primary outcomes assessed included perioperative complications, recurrence requiring surgery, small bowel obstruction and incisional hernia.

Results

34 studies were included in the analysis, and represented 2,519 patients. Pooled analysis showed reduced perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection vs. open resection (Risk Ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.58 – 0.86, P = 0.001). There was no evidence of a difference in the rate of surgical recurrence (Rate Ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.54 – 1.11, P = 0.17) or small bowel obstruction (Rate Ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.28 – 1.45, P = 0.28) between techniques. There was evidence of a decrease in incisional hernia following laparoscopic surgery (Rate Ratio 0.24, 95% CI 0.07 – 0.82, P = 0.02).

Conclusions

This is the largest review in this topic. The results of this analysis are based primarily on non-randomized studies and thus have significant limitations in regards to selection bias, confounding, lack of blinding and potential publication bias. Although we found evidence of decreased perioperative complications and incisional hernia in the laparoscopic group, further randomized controlled trials, with adequate follow up, are needed before strong recommendations can be made.

Surgical management of IBD--from an open to a laparoscopic approach

Surgery is a key feature of IBD management. Up to 70% of patients with Crohn's disease and 35% of patients with ulcerative colitis will require surgery during the course of their disease. This Review provides an overview of IBD surgical management, focusing on the potential benefits and drawbacks of laparoscopy compared with open surgery. Emergency and elective indications for both laparoscopic and open surgery are detailed for patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Evidence-based comparative results of these surgical approaches are discussed, along with factors that influence patient outcomes. Upcoming new techniques for IBD surgical management, including single-port surgery, are also presented.

A laparoscopic approach reduces short-term complications and length of stay following ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease: an analysis of outcomes from the NSQIP database

AIM

Studies to date examining the impact of laparoscopy in resection for Crohn's disease on short-term morbidity have been limited by small study populations. The aim of this study was to establish the impact of the operative approach (laparoscopic or open) on outcomes after ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.

METHOD

Ileocolic resections for Crohn's disease were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2005-2009). Complications were categorized as major (organ system damage and systemic sepsis) or minor (incisional and urinary infections). Multivariate 30-day outcomes and length of stay were determined using linear models adjusting for patient characteristics, comorbidities and operative approach.

RESULTS

Of 1917 ileocolic resections, 644 (34%) were performed laparoscopically. At baseline, the open group was significantly older, had more comorbidities, higher American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classes, and more intra-operative transfusions (all variables, P<0.05). On multivariate analysis, laparoscopic ileocolic resections were associated with a decrease in major (OR=0.629, 95% CI: 0.430-0.905, P=0.014) and minor (OR=0.576, 95% CI: 0.405-0.804, P=0.002) complications compared with open resections. Laparoscopy was associated with a significant reduction in adjusted length of stay compared with the open approach (-1.08±0.29 days, P=0.0002).

CONCLUSION

After adjusting for comorbidities and perioperative factors, such as preoperative sepsis, higher ASA class and higher transfusion rates in the open group, laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease was found to be a safer choice than the open approach, resulting in fewer complications and length of stay. All other things being equal, such patients should be offered the laparoscopic approach as a first-choice option.

Hospital discharge criteria following colorectal surgery: a systematic review

AIM

The aim of this study was to identify and synthesize the hospital discharge criteria that have been used in the colorectal surgery literature.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using eight bibliographic databases. Searches were limited to English language journal articles published between January 1996 and October 2009. Primary research applying hospital discharge criteria following colorectal surgery was included. Study selection was made independently by two reviewers. Discharge criteria were extracted from each included study.

RESULTS

The 156 studies identified by the search strategy described 70 different sets of criteria to indicate readiness for discharge. The majority of studies applied a combination of three or four criteria; those most frequently cited were tolerance of oral intake (80%), return of bowel function (70%), adequate pain control (44%) and adequate mobility (35%). End-points employed to determine the achievement of criteria were generally poorly defined.

CONCLUSION

A variety of hospital discharge criteria were applied in the colorectal surgery literature. Development of standardized criteria will allow more accurate comparison of results between studies assessing hospital length of stay or other discharge-related outcome measures.

Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease

In spite of the recent improvements in drug therapy, surgery still represents the most frequent treatment for Crohn's disease (CD) complications. Laparoscopy has been widely applied over the last twenty years in colorectal surgery and was associated with lower postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization, faster return to daily activities, and better cosmetic results. Laparoscopy experienced a slower diffusion in inflammatory bowel disease surgery than in oncologic colorectal surgery, but proved to be safe and effective, and is currently considered the gold standard for the treatment of primary uncomplicated ileocolic CD. Indications for laparoscopy in CD have recently been widened to embrace more complicated or recurrent CD. This paper reviews the available data on the subset of recurrent CD patients. The reported results indicate that laparoscopy may be safely applied even in selected recurrent CD cases in hands of IBD surgeons with broad laparoscopic experience.

Video-assisted versus open ileocolic resection in primary Crohn's disease: a comparative case-matched study

Despite the technical difficulties, laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease (CD) has become widely accepted in recent years, due to its potential benefits. There are numerous reports concerning the use of laparoscopy in successfully treating CD, including two randomized trials and few comparative studies. For the most part, these reports outline use of laparoscopic approach in primary distal ileal or ileocolic disease, with a careful selection of the patients. The purpose of this comparative case-control study was to point out potential advantages and disadvantages in short- and long-term outcomes of the laparoscopic approach compared with the open one. From January 1999 to January 2004, 200 patients were admitted in our Surgical Unit for complicated primary CD. 100 patients (group 1) underwent a laparoscopic ileocolic resection, 100 patients (group 2), with alike demographic and clinical characteristics, underwent the same procedure using a traditional approach. The incidence of perforative disease was 32 and 40% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Average operative time was 140 min (range 90-245 min) in the video-assisted group and 98 min (range 65-255 min) in group 2 (P < 0.05). Postoperative morbidity was 6 and 8% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = NS). Recovery of peristalsis occurred within 2-3 days in group 1 and 3-4 days in group 2 (P = NS). Median postoperative hospitalization was 7 days (range 5-18 days) in group 1 and 9 days (range 7-22 days) in control group (P < 0.05). The overall rate of surgical relapse of CD was 8 and 13% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = NS), at a mean follow-up of 52 and 60 months, respectively. The 1-year surgical recurrence rate was similar (3%) for the two groups. In conclusions, in spite of the technical difficulties, video-assisted surgery for CD offers advantages over laparotomy, including less postoperative pain, reduced postoperative hospital stay, less disability of the patient, and better cosmetic results. Potential advantages are: easier approach for re-resection, lower rate of postoperative adhesions and bowel obstruction, and lower rate of wound complications.

Crohn's disease: a surgeon's perspective

Crohn's disease (CD) is known for wide anatomic distribution, different presentations, life-threatening complications, and multiple modalities of management. Its multiple implications are still unaddressed. Since all the patients do not show a good response to medical modalities of treatment, a significant percentage of these patients are referred to the surgeon for the palliation of complications or for the ultimate curative treatment. Since most surgeons come across such patients only rarely, it is sometimes difficult for them to choose the appropriate procedure at the time of need. Moreover, the various surgical modalities available for the different presentations and complications of the disease have not been adequately discussed. The aim of this review is to offer insight and a detailed account of the management of CD from a surgical perspective. This review offers an overview of the various surgical options available, their utility in context, and an approach to various scenarios of complicated CD.

Can Laparoscopic Ileocolic Resection be Performed with Comparable Safety to Open Surgery for Regional Enteritis: Data from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Laparoscopic ileocolic resection is feasible for Crohn's disease but few studies adjust for the various preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables that may confound comparisons with open surgery. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes after laparoscopic (LICR) and open ileocolic resection (OICR) performed for regional enteritis using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data. Retrospective evaluation of data prospectively accrued into the NSQIP database for patients undergoing ileocolic resection for Crohn's by LICR and OICR was performed. LICR (n = 104) and OICR (n = 203) groups had similar age ( P = 0.1), body mass index ( P = 0.9), smoking history ( P = 0.6), steroid use ( P = 0.7), diabetes ( P = 0.3), serum albumin ( P = 0.07), and American Society of Anesthesiologists class ( P = 0.13). LICR group had more female patients ( P = 0.005). Complications including surgical site infections ( P = 0.5), wound dehiscence ( P = 1), pneumonia ( P = 0.1), deep vein thrombosis ( P = 0.3), pulmonary embolism ( P = 1), urinary infection ( P = 0.1), and return to the operating room ( P = 0.2) were similar. LICR had shorter length of hospital stay than OICR ( P < 0.001). In current practice, as observed with the NSQIP data, LICR, performed by experienced surgeons, is comparable in safety to OICR and is associated with a shorter hospital stay.

Advances in surgical approaches to Crohn's disease: minimally invasive surgery and biologic therapy

In the last 5 years, significant advances have been made in the surgical approaches to, and medical management of, Crohn's disease (CD). This review summarizes these advances as they relate to the care of surgical patients with CD, with an emphasis on innovations in surgical techniques, specifically minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery, as well as on recent developments in biologic pharmacotherapies for CD that have important clinical implications for surgical patients. These include recent insights gained into the role of biologic therapy with infliximab and other newer agents in preoperative and postoperative therapy of CD patients. We will also review other recent developments relevant to the current and future surgical care of CD patients, including the treatment of less common forms of CD, such as duodenal and colonic CD, and the role of novel strategies such as fibrin glue, fistula plugs and stem cell therapy for the treatment of fistulizing anorectal CD.

Resultados do registro de cirurgias colorretais videolaparoscópicas realizadas no Estado de Minas Gerais - Brasil de 1996 a 2009

INTRODUÇÃO: A partir de 1991, a videolaparoscopia começou a ser considerada no tratamento de doenças colorretais. O aprimoramento da técnica cirúrgica associado aos benefícios encontrados em diversos estudos publicados levou a modificações nas perspectivas da videolaparoscopia. A partir da publicação do estudo COST as ressecções oncológicas laparoscópicas foram reconhecidas como alternativa viável, com resultados semelhantes à cirurgia convencional. PACIENTES E MÉTODOS: Realizou-se pesquisa através de formulário específico e consulta a prontuários dos principais serviços de coloproctologia de Belo Horizonte. Avaliando-se sexo, idade, indicação cirúrgica, procedimento realizado, técnica laparoscópica, complicações, conversão, estadiamento e recidiva (no caso de neoplasias). RESULTADOS: Foram levantados dados sobre 503 cirurgias colorretais laparoscópicas: 347 (68,9%) em mulheres e 156 (31,1%) homens. A técnica cirúrgica foi totalmente laparoscópica em 137 casos, vídeo-assistida 245 casos. O procedimento mais realizado foi a retossigmoidectomia (41,1%), seguido pela colectomia direita (12,5%), colectomia esquerda (6,9%). Doenças benignas foram responsáveis por 259 (51,5%) casos, destes as principais indicações cirúrgicas foram endometriose 126 (48,6%), pólipos 40 (15,4%), doença diverticular 30 (11,6%). Das 240 cirurgias realizadas por doenças malignas as mais frequentes foram retossigmoidectomia 102 (42,5%), colectomia direita 46 (19,1%), colectomia esquerda 18 (7,5%), amputação abdominoperineal 18 (7,5%). Houve 54 conversões (10.7%) dos casos, 12,9% (31/240) nos casos de neoplasias, 8,5% (22/259) nos de doenças benignas. Complicações sistêmicas ou cirúrgicas ocorreram em 31 (6,1%) e 56 (11,1%) casos, respectivamente. Foram registrados onze (2,18%) óbitos nos primeiros 30 dias após a cirurgia. CONCLUSÃO: O estudo atual foi o primeiro levantamento da implantação de cirurgias colorretais laparoscópicas realizado de forma multicêntrica em Minas Gerais. Os dados levantados são consistentes com registros nacionais de videocirurgia colorretal, mostrando a eficiência do método de aprendizado com realização de cirurgias com tutor. Além disso, que pequena parte das cirurgias colorretais são realizadas por via laparoscópica no estado, restritos apenas a centros especializados, sobrecarregando esses serviços e limitando o acesso para a população.

Laparoscopy for benign colorectal diseases

The applicability of laparoscopy to many complex intraabdominal colorectal procedures continues to expand, and has been shown to be feasible and safe in experienced hands. Data are available on the elderly, rectal prolapse, diverticulitis, Hartman's takedown, small bowel obstruction, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis. Clinically relevant advantages have been clearly demonstrated in selected patient populations. Laparoscopic surgery for benign colorectal disease should be considered in patients suitable for this approach to an abdominal operation.

Laparoscopically assisted ileocolectomy in patients with Crohn's disease: a study of 50 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and immediate postoperative outcome of laparoscopically assisted ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively from a database of 50 consecutive patients with Crohn's disease who underwent ileocolic resection between 1997 and 2007. The mean age of the patients was 40 years (range, 20-74 years), and 21 of the patients were men. Of the 50 patients, 18 had a history of abdominal surgery. The mean time from diagnosis to operation was 6.4 years (range, 1-31 years). The indications for surgery included subobstruction (48%), failure of medical treatment (20%), and internal fistulas (32%).

RESULTS

The mean operating time was 150 min (range, 80-360 min), and the blood loss was 130 ml (0-400 ml). Only 1 of the 50 patients underwent conversion to laparotomy. Return of bowel movement occurred at a mean of 3 days (range, 1-7 days). The median hospital stay was 8 days (range, 5-130 days). There was no 30-day mortality. The minor complication rate was 20%. The complications included wound infection, pneumonia, urinary infection, postoperative bleeding, prolonged ileus, and fever of unknown origin. Major complications occurred for four patients, with three patients experiencing an anastomotic leak and one patient a leak after fistulectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopically assisted approach to ileocolic Crohn's disease seems to be feasible and safe, with acceptable immediate postoperative outcomes.

Comparison of conventional and laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure reversal

PURPOSE

This study compares open Hartmann's procedure reversal (OHPR) and laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure reversal (LHPR) in patients first treated for peritonitis (Henchey III or IV).

METHODS

Fourteen patients who underwent LHPR during a 2-year period were compared with 20 patients who had previously undergone an open procedure at the same institution.

RESULTS

Conversion rate was 14.28%. Operating time was shorter for the laparoscopic group [143 (90 to 240) vs. 180 (90 to 350) min, P<0.05]. Hospital length of stay was shorter for the laparoscopic group [9.5 (4 to 18) vs. 11 (6 to 39)]. Use of patient-controlled analgesia was not significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group [3 (0 to 4) vs. 3.5 (0 to 8)]. Morbidities observed in the LHPR group include a parietal abscess and an anastomotic stenosis without surgical treatment. The OHPR group had 6 complications: 1 anastomotic leak and 5 incisional hernias.

CONCLUSIONS

LHPR with a conversion rate of 14.28% seems to be a method with shorter operating time and less morbidity compared with OHPR.

Functional outcomes of two types of subtotal colectomy for slow-transit constipation: ileosigmoidal anastomosis and cecorectal anastomosis

BACKGROUND

Some patients with severe slow-transit constipation may benefit from subtotal colectomy, but there is no consensus on standard operative mode. The aim of the study was to compare the functional outcomes of subtotal colectomy with cecorectal anastomosis (CRA) with those of subtotal colectomy with ileosigmoidal anastomosis (ISA) in patients with severe slow-transit constipation.

METHODS

Records of 79 patients who received preoperative investigation to confirm slow transit at our institution from 1989 to 2004 and subsequently received colectomy with CRA (n = 34) or colectomy with ISA (n = 45) were reviewed. The mean follow-up was 2 years (range 1-15).

RESULTS

Postoperative defecation frequency increased and symptoms such as bloating and abdominal pain decreased in both groups. More CRA patients than ISA patients experienced persistent constipation and continued using laxatives or enemas at the 12-month follow-up. More ISA patients (93.3%) than CRA patients (73.5%) were satisfied with the procedure, whereas some patients in both groups complained of excessively high stool frequency and fecal incontinence.

CONCLUSION

Both CRA and ISA procedures increase the number of bowel movements; however, ISA results in higher defecation frequency, less use of laxatives and enemas, and higher patient satisfaction.

Long-term surgical recurrence, morbidity, quality of life, and body image of laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: a comparative study

PURPOSE

Several studies have compared conventional open ileocolic resection with a laparoscopic-assisted approach. However, long-term outcome after laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resection remains to be determined. This study was designed to compare long-term results of surgical recurrence, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted or open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.

METHODS

Seventy-eight consecutive patients who underwent ileocolic resection during the period 1995 to 1998 were analyzed; 48 underwent a conventional open approach in the Academic Medical Centre (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and 30 underwent a laparoscopic-assisted approach in the Leiden University Medical Centre (Leiden, The Netherlands). Primary outcome parameters were reoperation and readmission rate. Secondary outcome parameters were quality of life, body image, and cosmesis.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable for characteristics of sex, age, and immunosuppressive therapy. Seventy-one patients had a complete follow-up of median 8.5 years. Resection for recurrent Crohn's disease was performed in 6 of 27 (22 percent) and 10 of 44 (23 percent) patients in the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively. Reoperations for incisional hernia were only performed after conventional open ileocolic resection (3/44 = 6.8 percent). Quality of life and body image were comparable, but cosmesis scores were significantly higher in the laparoscopic group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite small numbers, we found that surgical recurrence and quality of life after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection were comparable. Incisional hernias occurred only after open ileocolic resection, and laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resection resulted in a significantly better cosmesis.

Laparoscopic surgery for patients with Crohn's colitis: a case-matched study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to compare short and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy with open colectomy in patients with Crohn's disease confined to the colon.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed all patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for Crohn's disease at our institution between 1994 and 2005. Laparoscopic colectomies were matched to open colectomies by patient age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, type, and year of surgery. We excluded patients with concomitant small bowel disease.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven laparoscopic cases were matched with 27 open cases. There were seven conversions (26%). There was no mortality. Median operative times were significantly longer after laparoscopic colectomy (240 vs 150 min, P < 0.01), and estimated blood loss was comparable (325 vs 350 ml, P = 0.4). Postoperative complications were similar. Laparoscopic colectomies had shorter median length of stay (5 vs 6 days, P = 0.07) and median time to first bowel movement (3 vs 4 days, P = 0.4). When overall length of stay included 30-day readmissions, the difference in favor of laparoscopy became statistically significant (P = 0.02). Recurrent disease requiring surgery was decreased after laparoscopy, although median follow-up was significantly shorter.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic colectomy is a safe and acceptable option for patients with Crohn's colitis. Longer follow-up is needed to accurately establish recurrence rates.

Surgery insight: minimally invasive surgery for IBD

The most frequently described laparoscopic operations for the management of patients with IBD are restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. For patients with Crohn's disease, there is level 1b evidence that, in experienced hands, laparoscopic ileocolic resection enhances recovery and leads to a shorter hospital stay compared with conventional ileocolic resection. The demonstrated advantages of laparoscopic ileocolic resection with regard to cost and cosmesis, and the acceptable long-term results achieved (which are at least comparable to those achieved by conventional ileocolic resection) favor the use of laparoscopic ileocolic resection over conventional ileocolic resection in patients with ileocolic Crohn's disease. For patients with ulcerative colitis, the expected advantages of laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy over conventional restorative proctocolectomy have yet to be clearly shown. Although there is a trend towards a reduced hospital stay (of only 1.6 days) when laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy is performed, operating times are disproportionably prolonged. The most important argument for offering patients with IBD the chance to undergo a laparoscopic procedure, rather than conventional open surgery, is (particularly for women) the long-term superior cosmesis and body image it confers.

Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study was designed to determine the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery in Crohn's disease.

METHODS

A search of published studies in English between January 1990 and February 2006 was performed by using the MEDLINE and PubMed databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The studies were reviewed by two independent assessors. Meta-analysis with the Forest plot was performed when raw data, means, and standard deviations were available.

RESULTS

The rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery was 11.2 percent. Laparoscopic procedures took longer to perform compared with open procedures, with a weighted mean difference of 25.54 minutes (P = 0.03). Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery had a more rapid recovery of bowel function, with a weighted mean difference of 0.75 days (P = 0.02) and were able to tolerate oral intake earlier, with a weighted mean difference of 1.43 days (P = 0.0008). The duration of hospitalization was shorter, with a weighted mean difference of 1.82 days (P = 0.02). Morbidity was lower for laparoscopic procedures compared with open procedures (odds ratio, 0.57; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.37-0.87; P = 0.01). The rate of disease recurrence was similar for both laparoscopic and open surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease takes longer to perform, but there are significant short-term benefits to the patient. The morbidity also is lower, and the rate of disease recurrence is similar. Therefore, laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease is both safe and feasible.

Laparoscopic colon surgery: past, present and future

Since its first described case in 1991, laparoscopic colon surgery has lagged behind minimally invasive surgical methods for solid intra-abdominal organs in terms of acceptability, dissemination, and ease of learning. In colon cancer, initial concerns over port site metastases and adequacy of oncologic resection have considerably dampened early enthusiasm for this procedure. Only recently, with the publication of several large, randomized controlled trials, has the incidence of port site metastases been shown to be equivalent to that of open resection. Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer has also been demonstrated to be at least equivalent to traditional laparotomy in terms of adequacy of oncologic resection, disease recurrence, and long-term survival. In addition, numerous reports have validated short-term benefits following laparoscopic resection for cancer, including shorter hospital stay, shorter time to recovery of bowel function, and decreased analgesic requirements, as well as other postoperative variables. In benign colonic disease, much less high-quality literature exists supporting the use of laparoscopic methods. Two recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated some short-term benefits to laparoscopic ileocolic resection for CD, in addition to evident cosmetic advantages. On the other hand, the current evidence on laparoscopic surgery for UC does not support its routine use among nonexpert surgeons outside of specialized centers. Laparoscopic colonic resection for diverticular disease appears to provide several short-term benefits, although these advantages may not translate to cases of complicated diverticulitis. Despite the increasing acceptability of minimally invasive methods for the management of benign and malignant colonic pathologies, laparoscopic colon resection remains a prohibitively difficult technique to master. Numerous technological innovations have been introduced onto the market in an effort to decrease the steep learning curve associated with laparoscopic colon surgery. Good evidence exists supporting the use of second-generation, sleeveless, hand-assist devices in this context. Similarly, new hemostatic devices such as the ultrasonic scalpel and the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer may be particularly helpful for extensive colonic mobilizations, in which several vascular pedicles must be taken. The precise role of these hemostatic technologies has yet to be established, particularly in comparison with stapling devices and significantly cheaper laparoscopic clips. Finally, recent advances in camera systems are promising to improve the ease with which difficult colonic dissections can be performed.

Comparison of laparoscopic and open ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease: a metaanalysis

BACKGROUND

The role of laparoscopic surgery for patients with ileocecal Crohn's disease is a contentious issue. This metaanalysis aimed to compare open resection with laparoscopically assisted resection for ileocecal Crohn's disease.

METHODS

A literature search of the Medline, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify comparative studies reporting outcomes for both laparoscopic and open ileocecal resection. Metaanalytical techniques were applied to identify differences in outcomes between the two groups. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken to evaluate the heterogeneity of the study.

RESULTS

Of 20 studies identified by literature review, 15 satisfied the criteria for inclusion in the study. These included outcomes for 783 patients, 338 (43.2%) of whom had undergone laparoscopic resection, with an overall conversion rate to open surgery of 6.8%. The operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group, by 29.6 min (p = 0.002), although the blood loss and complications in the two groups were similar. In terms of postoperative recovery, the laparoscopic patients had a significantly shorter time for recovery of their enteric function and a shorter hospital stay, by 2.7 days (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For selected patients with noncomplicated ileocecal Crohn's disease, laparoscopic resection offered substantial advantages in terms of more rapid resolution of postoperative ileus and shortened hospital stay. There was no increase in complications, as compared with open surgery. The contraindications to laparoscopic approaches for Crohn's disease remain undefined.

Factors that predict conversion in 69 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease: a prospective study

PURPOSE

This prospective study was designed to identify factors that could predict conversion in patients undergoing first laparoscopic ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease.

METHODS

Between 1998 and 2004, 69 consecutive patients (32 males; mean age, 32 +/- 9 years) who had undergone a first laparoscopic ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease were included in a prospective study. Twenty-one patients (30 percent) were converted into laparotomy. Possible factors for conversion were analyzed by both univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

No patient died. Four patients (9 percent; 2 in each group) required five reoperations because of intraperitoneal hemorrhage (n = 1), anastomotic fistula (n = 3), and small-bowel obstruction (n = 1). Mean hospital stay was significantly increased in converted compared with laparoscopic patients (9 +/- 4 vs. 7 +/- 3 days; P < 0.05). On univariate analysis, more than three episodes of acute flare of Crohn's disease (P = 0.02), male gender (P = 0.03), preoperative immunosuppressive drugs (P = 0.04), intra-abdominal abscess or fistula at the time of laparoscopy (P = 0.02), and resection of other intestinal segment (P = 0.02) were factors that predicted conversion. On multivariate analysis, recurrent medical episodes of Crohn's disease (odds ratio, 2; 95 percent confidence interval, 1-4), and intra-abdominal abscess or fistula at the time of laparoscopy (odds ratio, 15; 95 percent confidence interval, 4-78) were the two independent risk factors for conversion.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study demonstrated that the severity of the disease increased significantly the conversion rate of the first laparoscopic ileocecal resection. Knowledge of these risk factors for conversion could be helpful in preoperative preparation and counseling of patients.

Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with cecorectal anastomosis for slow-transit constipation

Subtotal colectomy with cecorectal anastomosis represents an interesting alternative to total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis. Several technical variants to the methods for performing the anastomosis between the cecum and the rectal stump after subtotal colectomy have been reported. The mechanical, antiperistaltic, end-to-end cecorectal anastomosis is safe and easy to perform. The authors aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of this technique performed laparoscopically in a series of four patients. All the procedures were completed laparoscopically. The mean time for surgery was 200 min (range, 180-220 min). There was no mortality and no postoperative complications. The mean hospital stay was 4 days (range, 3-5 days). This technique can be performed laparoscopically with all the advantages inherent to the minimally invasive approach.

Metaanalysis of trials comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Several studies in the literature have suggested that laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease is associated with faster postoperative recovery and a morbidity and recurrence rate similar to that for open surgery. Most of these studies have been limited by a small sample size and a short follow-up period.

METHODS

To clarify whether open or laparoscopic resection results in a better outcome, a metaanalysis of studies was performed comparing the two procedures for Crohn's disease. Pooled effects were estimated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic surgery required more operative time than open surgery (26.8 min; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.4-47.2 min), but resulted in a shorter duration of ileus and a decreased hospital stay (-2.62 days; 95% CI, -3.62 to -1.62). Laparoscopic surgery also was associated with a decreased rate for postoperative bowel obstruction and surgical recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease is feasible, safe, and associated with shorter duration of ileus and a shorter hospital stay.

Laparoscopy and its current role in the management of colorectal disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the current place of laparoscopy in the management of colorectal disease.

METHOD

A literature search was undertaken on Medline between the period 1991 and 2002.

RESULTS

From the literature there is good evidence that the laparoscopic approach is associated with at least some short-term advantages. Improved cosmesis and better patient's satisfaction are also evident. Because of this laparoscopy has been widely employed in various benign conditions. Among others, laparoscopic stoma formation, laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease and Crohn's disease, laparoscopic rectopexy, as well as laparoscopic assisted reversal of Hartmann's procedure were commonly reported. As port site recurrence and oncological safety are of less concern, there have been increasing reports on laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Although long-term follow up data is still limited, results of large prospective studies as well as various randomized trials show that recurrence and survival rates of the laparoscopic approach were at least comparable to open surgery. As experience and confidence accumulates, there are also increasing reports on technically demanding, laparoscopic sphincter-saving rectal excision. Articles on functional aspects following this type of resection also start to appear, which might be one of the future directions.

CONCLUSION

The applicability of laparoscopy to colorectal disease continues to expand. Laparoscopic approach should be considered for patients with benign conditions. For colorectal cancer, results from randomized trials so far have been favourable. Hence, the authors suggest the utility of laparoscopy in potentially curable cancer can also be judiciously relaxed.

Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease, and the role of repeated laparoscopy in reoperation.

METHODS

Between January 1994 and May 2002, 61 laparoscopic operations were attempted in 52 patients with ileal or ileocolonic Crohn's disease. Of these, 16 procedures were performed for recurrence at the anastomotic site (recurrent group). The remaining 45 operations were performed as primary procedures (control group). The median follow-up was 48 (range 3-90) months.

RESULTS

The median time to reoperation was 46 months. The incidence of enteric fistula and the conversion rate did not differ significantly between the two groups. Although the operating time was significantly longer in the recurrent group, there were no differences in the rate of postoperative complications (three in the recurrent group and six in the control group) and hospital stay (both median 8 days).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease is feasible in selected patients without an increase in conversion rate or postoperative complications.

What role, if any, for laparoscopic surgery in Crohn's disease of the hindgut?

An outsider to the field of surgery would probably take it for granted that surgeons have a highly developed rationale for choosing a laparoscopic approach to Crohns disease. After all, an increasing number of surgeons are performing laparoscopic surgery for Crohns disease as witnessed by several articles published in the 1990s (Table). In fact this is not quite true. Most papers are case reports or series without controls, capable only of suggesting feasibility. Furthermore, comparison studies often feature selection flaws, and therefore beg the question of whether laparoscopic surgery should or not be considered as standard care. An attempt is made herein to give readers a concise insight of the evidence available in the English language literature. It does not pretend to offer a comprehensive review of the topic rather, it highlights some relevant issues, and then outlines what role, if any, laparoscopic surgery should play in Crohn's disease. There are at least 6 categories for discussion.

Surgical treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Appropriate surgical management of Crohn disease is predicated on multiple variables, but stricturoplasty is generally reserved for small bowel disease, whereas resection is utilized in ileocolonic inflammation and favored for large bowel disease. Laparoscopic resection is becoming increasingly useful and justified for ileocolic resections, and segmental resection should be strongly considered for limited large bowel inflammation. Some centers are also using a laparoscopic approach for the surgical treatment of acute or chronic ulcerative colitis, although the benefits are less apparent. Proctocolectomy with ileostomy or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis returns the patient's quality of life to a level comparable to that enjoyed by the general population. Creation of a pouch is performed in most instances, but early complications may warrant pouch revision and later complications, such as pouchitis, can mandate pouch excision.