Interferon retreatment of nonresponders with HCV-RNA-positive chronic hepatitis C

Interferon for interferon nonresponding and relapsing patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

The widely-accepted treatment outcome for chronic hepatitis C is the sustained viral response (that is, no measurable viral RNA in blood six months after treatment). However, this surrogate outcome (as well as the previously employed biochemical and histologic ones) has never been validated. This situation exists because there are very few randomized clinical trials that have used clinical events (mortality or manifestations of decompensated cirrhosis) as outcomes, because those clinical events only occur after many years of infection. Patients in whom initial therapy fails to produce sustained viral responses do become potential candidates for retreatment; some of these individuals are not candidates for ribavirin or protease inhibitors and consideration could be given to retreatment with interferon alone.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of interferon monotherapy retreatment in chronic hepatitis C patients and to validate the currently employed surrogate outcomes in this group of patients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until 16 August 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials comparing interferon versus placebo or no treatment in chronic hepatitis C nonresponders and relapsers to previous interferon.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcomes were mortality (all-cause and hepatic), quality of life, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were liver-related morbidity, sustained viral responses, biochemical responses, histologic improvements, and costs. We used both fixed-effect and random-effects model meta-analyses, reporting only the former if no difference existed.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven trials were identified. Two of them were at low risk of bias (the HALT-C and EPIC3 trials) and included 1676 patients. Both of these trials addressed the role of long-term low-dose pegylated interferon therapy in patients with severe fibrosis (demonstrated on liver biopsy) and were designed to assess the clinical outcomes. The remaining five trials included 300 patients and were at high risk of bias. Based on all trials reporting the outcomes, no significant difference was observed in either all-cause mortality (78/843 (9.3%) versus 62/867 (7.2%); risk ratio (RR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 1.79; 3 trials) or hepatic mortality (41/532 (7.7%) versus 40/552 (7.2%); RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.63; 2 trials); however, when only the two trials at low risk of bias were combined, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the recipients of the pegylated interferon (78/828 (9.4%) versus 57/848 (6.7%); RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.96) although trial sequential analysis could not exclude the possibility of random error. There was less variceal bleeding in the recipients of the interferon (4/843 (0.5%) versus 18/867 (2.1%); RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.67; 3 trials), although again trial sequential analysis could not exclude the presence of a type I error and the effect could not be confirmed in a random-effects model meta-analysis. No significant differences were seen with regard to the development of ascites, encephalopathy, hepatocellular carcinoma, or the need for liver transplantation. One trial reported quality of life data; the pain score was significantly worse in the recipients of the pegylated interferon. Adverse effects tended to be more common in the interferon recipients; the ones that were significantly more common included hematologic complications, infections, flu-like symptoms, and rash. The recipients of interferon had significantly more sustained viral responses (20/557 (3.6%) versus 1/579 (0.2%); RR 15.38, 95% CI 2.93 to 80.71; 4 trials) and a type I error was excluded by trial sequential analysis. The METAVIR activity score also improved (36/55 (65%) versus 20/46 (43.5%); RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.18; 2 trials). No significant differences were seen with regard to histologic fibrosis assessments.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The clinical data were limited to patients with histologic evidence of severe fibrosis who were retreated with pegylated interferon. In this scenario, retreatment with interferon did not appear to provide significant clinical benefit and, when only the trials at low risk of bias were considered, retreatment for several years may even have increased all-cause mortality. Such treatment also produced adverse events. On the other hand, the treatment did result in improvement in some surrogate outcomes, namely sustained viral responses and histologic evidence of inflammation. Interferon monotherapy retreatment cannot be recommended for these patients. No clinical data are available for patients with less severe fibrosis. The sustained viral response cannot be used as a surrogate marker for hepatitis C treatment in this clinical setting with low sustained viral response rates and needs to be validated in others in which higher sustained viral response rates are reported.

High serum palmitic acid is associated with low antiviral effects of interferon-based therapy for hepatitis C virus

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection alters fatty acid synthesis and metabolism in association with HCV replication. The present study examined the effect of serum fatty acid composition on interferon (IFN)-based therapy. Fifty-five patients with HCV were enrolled and received IFN-based therapy. Patient characteristics, laboratory data (including fatty acids), and viral factors that could be associated with the anti-HCV effects of IFN-based therapy were evaluated. The effects of individual fatty acids on viral replication and IFN-based therapy were also examined in an in-vitro system. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the level of serum palmitic acid before treatment and HCV genotype were significant predictors for rapid virological response (RVR), early virological response (EVR), and sustained virological response (SVR). High levels of palmitic acid inhibited the anti-HCV effects of IFN-based therapy. HCV replication assays confirmed the inhibitory effects of palmitic acid on anti-HCV therapy. The concentration of serum palmitic acid is an independent predictive factor for RVR, EVR, and SVR in IFN-based antiviral therapy. These results suggest that the effect of IFN-based antiviral therapy in patients with HCV infection might be enhanced by treatment that modulates palmitic acid levels.

Association of amino acid substitution pattern in nonstructural protein 5A of hepatitis C virus genotype2a low viral load and response to interferon monotherapy

Patients with low titer (<0.5 mEq/ml) of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2a achieve high and sustained response (SR) rates to interferon (IFN) monotherapy, but we also encounter patients who are resistant to therapy. We explored the relationship between response to IFN and virological differences in such patients. We evaluated 159 consecutive naive patients with low titer of HCV genotype 2a who received IFN monotherapy. A case-control study matched for age, sex, and viral load was conducted to examine the substitution patterns in amino acid positions (amino acids) 2163-2254 of nonstructural (NS) 5A between nonresponders to ideal IFN dose (>/=500 million units) (nonresponders; NR) and responder to less than ideal dose. Overall, 82.4% achieved SR. The substitution numbers in amino acids 2193-2254 were higher in SR than NR patients (P < 0.05). High proportions of patients with substitution at amino acid 2205 (mainly threonine [T] instead of alanine [A]), dual amino acids 2169 and 2205 (mainly A-T instead of T-A), and those without substitution at amino acids 2227 were NR (P < 0.05). Four of 7 NR patients achieved SR after receiving a second course of IFN. Their amino acids patterns at positions probably associated with sensitivity to IFN did not change at the start of initial and second therapies except for one patient, and they had lower viral load and were treated with higher IFN dose in the second course compared with the initial course. Our results suggest that substitution patterns in NS5A in patients with low titer of HCV genotype 2a may affect their response to IFN, but the response to therapy may be affected by mechanisms other than substitutions in this region.

Interferon for interferon nonresponding and relapsing patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Interferon monotherapy leads to sustained virologic clearance in a minority of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Studies have yielded conflicting results regarding retreatment with interferon in nonresponders and relapsers.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of retreatment with interferon in chronic hepatitis C nonresponders and relapsers to previous interferon treatment.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified through electronic databases, manual searches, authors, and pharmaceutical companies (August 2001).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing interferon versus control or different interferon regimens in chronic hepatitis C patients being nonresponders and relapsers to previous interferon were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was failure to achieve a sustained virologic response defined as positive serum hepatitis C virus RNA at least six months following treatment. Secondary outcomes included liver-related morbidity, mortality, biochemical responses, adverse events, and histology.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten randomised trials involving 686 nonresponders and eight trials involving 484 relapsers were included; their methodological quality was poor. In nonresponders, interferon reduced the risk of not achieving an end of treatment biochemical response compared with no treatment (relative risk [RR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66 to 0.91); however, virologic responses were not reported. In a post hoc subgroup analysis, doses greater than 3 million units (MU) three times weekly offered no advantage compared with 3 MU three times weekly for biochemical sustained response. Failure to obtain a virologic sustained response was less likely with 48 than 24 weeks of therapy (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.96). Adverse events did not differ significantly regardless of treatment dose or duration. In relapsers, none of the trials compared interferon with no treatment. In a post hoc analysis, doses greater than 3 MU three times weekly were no more effective in achieving a virologic sustained response than 3 MU three times weekly. Compared with 24 weeks, treatment durations of 48 weeks were less likely to fail to achieve a virologic sustained response (RR 0.69, 95% CI Random 0.51 to 0.95), but associated with more frequent dosage reduction (RR 9.07, 95% CI 1.20 to 68.63). No data regarding clinical outcomes or histology was available in either patient group.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Retreatment with interferon leads to sustained virologic clearance in a minority of chronic hepatitis C patients with nonresponse or relapse following interferon monotherapy. Treatment durations of 48 weeks are superior to 24 weeks, but doses greater than 3 MU three times weekly are no more effective. No data exists regarding the effect on clinical outcomes.

High-dose interferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C not responding to recombinant alpha-interferon

BACKGROUND

Recently, the combination treatment of recombinant alpha-interferon plus ribavirin has been proposed for chronic hepatitis C patients unresponsive to previous therapy with recombinant alpha-interferon alone.

AIM

To determine the effectiveness of the combination therapy for the re-treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients unresponsive to previous interferon therapy. Immediate and long-term follow-up data are reported.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A series of 100 patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to recombinant alpha-interferon 3 MU tiw, were randomly assigned to two groups of 50 patients each: Group A, treated with recombinant alpha-interferon therapy for an additional six months but at a double dosage (6 MU tiw) in association with ribavirin. Group B, same treatment as group A but without ribavirin. All patients responsive to therapy were then followed-up for at least 12 months. At the end of the treatment and at the end of the follow-up period, we distinguished between complete responses (return to normal of alanine aminotransferase with undetectable serum HCV-RNA] and biochemical responses (return to normal of alanine aminotransferase still with detectable viraemia).

RESULTS

Side-effects were observed only in patients treated with recombinant alpha-interferon plus ribavirin: 12% discontinued the therapy due to haemolytic anaemia. In group A, the percentages of end-of-treatment complete response, end-of-treatment biochemical response, sustained complete response, and sustained biochemical response, were 38%, 20%, 8%, and 14%, respectively, whilst in group B, these percentages were 12%, 16%, 6%, and 16%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that in patients with chronic hepatitis C unresponsive to previous recombinant alpha-interferon therapy, re-treatment with higher recombinant alpha-interferon doses, either alone or in combination with ribavirin, lead to mild long-term benefit. However, the satisfactory end of treatment complete response in group A suggests that a significant percentage of patients are sensitive to the combination therapy; and that a more aggressive therapeutic protocol in this selected subset of patients could result in a larger number of long-lasting responses leading, in turn, to a more favourable cost-effect ratio.

Importance of pretreatment viral load and monitoring of serum hepatitis C virus RNA in predicting responses to interferon-alpha2a treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Hanshin Chronic Hepatitis C Study Group

The aim of this study was to determine what factors correlate with a favorable response to interferon-alpha2a (IFN-alpha2a) treatment in chronic hepatitis C. Fifty patients with chronic hepatitis C who received a 26-week treatment with IFN-alpha2a (474 million units in total) were assessed for pretreatment parameters and biochemical and virologic events during the treatment. According to biochemical and virologic responses to the treatment, 16 patients (32%) were categorized as sustained complete responders (SR), 13 (26%) as initial complete responders (IR), and 21 (42%) as nonresponders (NR). By multivariate analysis, a low viremia level was the only independent predictor of SR among pretreatment parameters (p = 0.0088). The percentage of patients showing hepatitis C virus RNA negativity at 2 and 12 weeks of treatment was significantly higher in SR (94% and 100%, respectively) or IR (69% and 92%, respectively) than in NR (14% and 33%, respectively) (p = 0.001). In contrast, the normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase levels at both time points failed to differentiate among SR, IR, and NR. These results indicate that monitoring of serum hepatitis C virus RNA at an appropriate time during treatment in addition to determination of pretreatment viral load is important in predicting responses to IFN-alpha2a treatment.

Utility of hepatitis C virus RNA levels for predicting the therapeutic efficacy of interferon

We studied the levels of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA, the HCV genotype before interferon therapy, and the kinetics of serum HCV-RNA at the initial stages of therapy to determine their utility in predicting the therapeutic efficacy of interferon in 44 patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. We also looked at the efficacy of repeated interferon treatment in relation to the kinetics of serum HCV-RNA. The level of serum HCV-RNA determined by a branched DNA probe assay before interferon treatment and that by a reverse transcription nested polymerase chain reaction assay during the initial stages of interferon administration were useful for predicting the efficacy of treatment. Furthermore, detection of serum HCV-RNA by the reverse transcription nested polymerase chain reaction assay after the completion of interferon therapy indicated relapse at its earliest stage. In patients who experience relapse, repeated treatment with an appropriate dose of interferon before an increase in viral levels may increase the proportion of complete responses.

Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma after interferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C

We examined the effect of interferon (IFN) therapy for chronic active hepatitis (CAH) C in 207 patients by estimating the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after IFN therapy using the person-years method. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test. No HCC was detected in patients with normal serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels after IFN therapy (response-effect group), and in patients with both normal serum ALT levels and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA clearance after IFN therapy (complete-responder group). The incidence per 100,000 person-years in the patients with elevated serum ALT level after IFN therapy (other-effects group) were 1968 and 1624, respectively. The incidence in control patients who did not achieve IFN therapy was 901. No statistically significant differences were observed between the other-effects group, non-responder group, and the control group. Our results so far suggest that normalization of the serum ALT levels and/or HCV clearance might reduce the incidence of HCC.