Gualandris L, Duprat AM, Rougé P. Cross-linking of membrane glycoconjugates is not a sufficient condition for neural induction by concanavalin A.
CELL DIFFERENTIATION 1987;
21:93-9. [PMID:
2820587 DOI:
10.1016/0045-6039(87)90416-7]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Tetravalent native concanavalin A (Con A) has a neural inducing effect on amphibian presumptive ectoderm. The divalent dimeric form of this lectin, succinylated Con A (Succ-Con A), is devoid of neuralizing action on this target tissue in Pleurodeles waltlii. These results suggested that cross-linking of Con A receptors on the cell membrane (which is not provoked by the divalent lectin) might be required for neural induction. To test this possibility, Succ-Con A binding sites were experimentally cross-linked after binding of Succ-Con A to the target cell surface, using anti-Con A antibodies. The combination of these two agents mimics the cross-linking of Con A. The results showed that cross-linking alone, either by treatment with Succ-Con A and anti-Con A antibodies, or with the lectins WGA and PHA, which also cross-link cell surface binding sites, was not able to induce neuralization. This suggested that the inductive action of Con A cannot be explained in terms of receptor cross-linking.
Collapse