Radioimmunoscintigraphy of CEA/CA 19-9 producing tumors with I-131 labeled monoclonal antibodies

Immune-Directed Molecular Imaging Biomarkers

Imaging has played a critical role in the management of patients with cancer. Novel therapies are emerging rapidly; however, they are effective only in some patients. With the advent of new targeted therapeutics and immunotherapy, the limitations of conventional imaging methods are becoming more evident. FDG-PET imaging is restricted to the optimal assessment of immune therapies. There is a critical unmet need for pharmacodynamic and prognostic imaging biomarkers. Radiolabeled antibodies or small molecules can allow for specific assessment of targets in expression and concentration. Several such imaging agents have been under preclinical development. Early human studies with radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies or small molecules targeted to the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway have shown potential; targeted imaging of CA19.9 and CA-IX and are being further explored. Immune-directed imaging agents are highly desirable as biomarkers and preliminary studies with radiolabeled antibodies targeting immune mechanisms appear promising. While novel agents are being developed, larger well-designed studies are needed to validate the role of these agents as biomarkers in the clinical management of patients.

Effect of radioimmunoscintigraphy on the management of recurrent colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Radioimmunoscintigraphy (RIS) is being used increasingly as a new investigation in the diagnosis of recurrent colorectal cancer. This study assessed the efficacy of 99mTc-radiolabelled PR1A3 scanning in a cohort of patients with possible recurrent colorectal cancer and the effects of scan interpretation on subsequent clinical management.

METHODS

The scans and case notes of patients scanned over a 3-year period were reviewed.

RESULTS

Forty-seven scans in 40 patients were available for analysis. In 39 instances in which scan interpretation could be verified accurately, sensitivity for recurrent colorectal cancer was 22 of 23 (96 per cent), specificity for recurrent colorectal cancer was eight of 16 (50 per cent), positive predictive value for recurrence was 22 of 30 (73 per cent) and negative predictive value for recurrence was eight of nine (89 per cent). In 16 of the 40 patients, scan interpretation strengthened a management decision or altered management. This was beneficial to ten patients and possibly detrimental to six.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that RIS is sensitive in the detection of recurrent colorectal cancer and benefited the patient in one-quarter of cases. For the majority of patients, accurate detection of recurrent disease cannot be followed by curative therapy, but there is an important subgroup of patients in whom RIS alters management beneficially. However, a randomized prospective study is needed to confirm this.