Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: investigation of feature-analysis techniques

Neighbourhood search feature selection method for content-based mammogram retrieval

Content-based image retrieval plays an increasing role in the clinical process for supporting diagnosis. This paper proposes a neighbourhood search method to select the near-optimal feature subsets for the retrieval of mammograms from the Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS) database. The features based on grey level cooccurrence matrix, Daubechies-4 wavelet, Gabor, Cohen-Daubechies-Feauveau 9/7 wavelet and Zernike moments are extracted from mammograms available in the MIAS database to form the combined or fused feature set for testing various feature selection methods. The performance of feature selection methods is evaluated using precision, storage requirement and retrieval time measures. Using the proposed method, a significant improvement is achieved in mean precision rate and feature dimension. The results show that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art feature selection methods.

Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) in Screening Mammography:Sensitivity of Commercial CAD Systems for Detecting Architectural Distortion

OBJECTIVE

Computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithms have successfully revealed breast masses and microcalcifications on screening mammography. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the sensitivity of commercially available CAD systems for revealing architectural distortion, the third most common appearance of breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two commercially available CAD systems were used to evaluate screening mammograms obtained in 43 patients with 45 mammographically detected regions of architectural distortion. For each CAD system, we determined the sensitivity for revealing architectural distortion on at least one image of the two-view mammographic examination (case sensitivity) and for each individual mammogram (image sensitivity). Surgical biopsy results were available for each case of architectural distortion.

RESULTS

Architectural distortion was deemed present and actionable by a panel of expert breast imagers in 80 views of the 45 cases. One CAD system detected distortion in 22 of 45 cases of distortion (case sensitivity, 49%) and in 30 of 80 mammograms (image sensitivity, 38%); it displayed 0.7 false-positive marks per image. Another CAD system identified distortion in 15 of 45 cases (case sensitivity, 33%) and 17 of 80 mammograms (image sensitivity, 21%); it displayed 1.27 false-positive marks per image. Sensitivity for malignancy-caused distortion was similar to or lower than sensitivity for all causes of distortion.

CONCLUSION

Fewer than one half of the cases of architectural distortion were detected by the two most widely available CAD systems used for interpretations of screening mammograms. Considerable improvement in the sensitivity of CAD systems is needed for detecting this type of lesion. Practicing breast imagers who use CAD systems should remain vigilant for architectural distortion.

Computer-aided breast cancer detection and diagnosis of masses using difference of Gaussians and derivative-based feature saliency

A new model-based vision (MBV) algorithm is developed to find regions of interest (ROI's) corresponding to masses in digitized mammograms and to classify the masses as malignant/benign. The MBV algorithm is comprised of five modules to structurally identify suspicious ROI's, eliminate false positives, and classify the remaining as malignant or benign. The focus of attention module uses a difference of Gaussians (DoG) filter to highlight suspicious regions in the mammogram. The index module uses tests to reduce the number of nonmalignant regions from 8.39 to 2.36 per full breast image. Size, shape, contrast, and Laws texture features are used to develop the prediction module's mass models. Derivative-based feature saliency techniques are used to determine the best features for classification. Nine features are chosen to define the malignant/benign models. The feature extraction module obtains these features from all suspicious ROI's. The matching module classifies the regions using a multilayer perceptron neural network architecture to obtain an overall classification accuracy of 100% for the segmented malignant masses with a false-positive rate of 1.8 per full breast image. This system has a sensitivity of 92% for locating malignant ROI's. The database contains 272 images (12 b, 100 microm) with 36 malignant and 53 benign mass images. The results demonstrate that the MBV approach provides a structured order of integrating complex stages into a system for radiologists.

Current status of digital mammography

Some inherent limitations to further technical improvement in film-screen mammography exist. Many of these limitations can be overcome effectively with digital mammography, in which image acquisition, display, and storage are performed independently, thus allowing the optimization of each. Presented is a brief background of digital and analog imaging with emphasis on the features and drawbacks of digital mammography systems. Image storage, processing, and display, computer-aided detection and diagnosis, as well as telemammography are also discussed.

Computerized identification of suspicious regions for masses in digitized mammograms

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

A simple and effective computerized detection scheme was developed to identify suspicious mass regions in digitized mammograms.

METHODS

This method identifies a maximum of five suspicious mass regions per image and was tested with a database of 510 images, including 162 verified masses. It includes a series of five rule-based processes that select one region with each of the following characteristics: 1) a global minimum of optical density in a smoothed image; 2) a local minimum of optical density in the original image; 3) a local minimum of optical density in a filtered image; 4) a small "mass" of low contrast; and 5) a small "mass" of high contrast.

RESULTS

This multi-stage process achieved a sensitivity of 95% while limiting false-positive detection rates to below an average of two per image.

CONCLUSION

Because this method limits the initial number of suspicious mass regions while retaining high sensitivity, it may be applicable to clinically usable computer-aided diagnosis schemes.

Computerized detection of masses from digitized mammograms: comparison of single-image segmentation and bilateral-image subtraction

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Two methods--single-image segmentation and bilateral-image subtraction--have been used commonly as the first stage in computer-aided detection (CAD) schemes to detect masses on digitized mammograms. In the current study, we investigated and compared the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods in achieving a high sensitivity for mass detection.

METHODS

Two CAD schemes were tested. One used Gaussian filtering based on single-image segmentation, and the other used bilateral-image subtraction based on left-right image pairs to identify suspicious mass regions. A clinical database that contained 152 verified mass cases was used to compare the two approaches.

RESULTS

The single-image segmentation method yielded 100% sensitivity and had a somewhat higher number of initial suspicious regions. The bilateral-image subtraction method missed several true-positive regions at the initial phase. Each approach achieved more than 90% sensitivity at a false-positive rate of approximately 0.8 per image.

CONCLUSION

Optimal initial image segmentation schemes may depend on the complete detection and classification method used. Single-image segmentation methods may perform comparably with bilateral-image segmentation schemes, and these techniques appear to be more versatile and easily adaptable to future clinical CAD applications.

Computerized detection of masses in digitized mammograms using single-image segmentation and a multilayer topographic feature analysis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

We developed and evaluated a computer-aided detection (CAD) scheme for masses in digitized mammograms.

METHODS

A multistep CAD scheme was developed and tested. The method uses a technique of single-image segmentation with Gaussian bandpass filtering to yield a high sensitivity for mass detection. A rule-based multilayer topographic feature analysis method is then used to classify suspected regions. A set of 260 cases, including 162 verified masses, was divided into two subsets; one set was used to set the rule-based classification and one was used to test the performance of the scheme.

RESULTS

In a preliminary clinical study, the implemented detection scheme yielded 98% sensitivity with a false-positive detection rate of less than one false-positive region per image.

CONCLUSION

Single-image segmentation methods seem to have high sensitivity in selecting true-positive mass regions in the first stage of a CAD scheme. A multilayer topographic image feature analysis method in the second stage of a CAD scheme has the potential to significantly reduce the false-positive detection rate.