Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm neck morphology: Proposed classification system

A computational study of artery curvature and endograft oversize influence on seal zone behavior in endovascular aortic repair

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a minimally invasive procedure involving the placement of an endograft inside the dissection or an aneurysm to direct blood flow and prevent rupture. A significant challenge in endovascular surgery is the geometrical mismatch between the endograft and the artery, which can lead to endoleak formation, a condition where blood leaks between the endograft and the vessel wall. This study uses computational modeling to investigate the effects of artery curvature and endograft oversizing, the selection of an endograft with a larger diameter than the artery, on endoleak creation. Finite element analysis is employed to simulate the deployment of endografts in arteries with varying curvature and diameter. Numerical simulations are conducted to assess the seal zone and to quantify the potential endoleak volume as a function of curvature and oversizing. A theoretical framework is developed to explain the mechanisms of endoleak formation along with proof-of-concept experiments. Two main mechanisms of endoleak creation are identified: local buckling due to diameter mismatch and global buckling due to centerline curvature mismatch. Local buckling, characterized by excess graft material buckling and wrinkle formation, increases with higher levels of oversizing, leading to a larger potential endoleak volume. Global buckling, where the endograft bends or deforms to conform to the centerline curvature of the artery, is observed to require a certain degree of oversizing to bridge the curvature mismatch. This study highlights the importance of considering both curvature and diameter mismatch in the design and clinical use of endografts. Understanding the mechanisms of endoleak formation can provide valuable insights for optimizing endograft design and surgical planning, leading to improved clinical outcomes in endovascular aortic procedures.

The Effect of EndoAnchors on Aneurysm Sac Regression for Patients Treated With Infrarenal Endovascular Repair With Hostile Neck Anatomies: A Propensity Scored Analysis

PURPOSE

To analyze sac evolution patterns in matched patients with hostile neck anatomy (HNA) treated with standard endovascular aneurysm repair (sEVAR) and endosutured aneurysm repair (ESAR).

METHODS

Observational retrospective study using prospectively collected data between June 2010 and December 2019. ESAR group data were extracted from the primary arm of the PERU registry with an assigned identifier (NCT04100499) at 8 centers and those from the sEVAR came from 4 centers. Suitability for inclusion required: no proximal endograft adjuncts (besides EndoAnchor use), ≤15 mm neck length and minimum of 12-months follow-up imaging. Bubble-shaped neck (noncylindrical short neck with discontinuous seal) aspect was analyzed. Both groups were analyzed using propensity score matching (PSM) for aortic neck length, width, angulation, and device fixation type. Main outcome assessed was sac evolution patterns (sac expansion and regression were defined as >5mm increase or decrease, of the maximum sac diameter respectively; all AAAs within this ±5 mm range in diameter change were considered stable) and secondary outcomes were type-Ia endoleaks; other endoleaks and mortality. A power analysis calculation >80% was confirmed for sac regression evaluation.

RESULTS

After exclusions, PSM resulted in 96 ESAR and 96 sEVAR patients. Mean imaging follow-up (months) was 44.4±21.3 versus 43.0±19.6 (p=0.643), respectively. The overall number of patients achieving sac regression was higher in the ESAR group (n=57, 59.4% vs n=31, 32.3%; p<0.001) and the cumulative sac regression achieved at 5 years was 65% versus 38% (p=0.003) in favor of the ESAR group. There were no statistically significant differences in type-Ia endoleak and/or other endoleaks. Univariate analysis for sac regression patients in the sEVAR and ESAR group individually showed the bubble-shape neck as a predictor of sac regression failure. There were no statistical differences in overall and aneurysm-related mortality.

CONCLUSION

Endosutured aneurysm repair provided improved rates of sac regression for patients with AAA and HNA when compared with sEVAR at midterm and up to 5 years, despite similar rates of type-Ia endoleaks, and the need to consider some important limitations. The presence of bubble-shaped neck was a predictor of sac regression failure for both groups equally.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The use of EndoAnchors aids and improves EVAR treatment in hostile neck anatomies by an increased rate of sac regression when compared to EVAR treatment alone in up to 5 year analysis. Moreover, a trend to reduced number of type Ia endoleaks is also achieved, although not significant in the present study. This data, adds to current and growing evidence on the usefulness of EndoAnchors for AAA endovascular treatment.

Is Evar Feasible in Challenging Aortic Neck Anatomies? A Technical Review and Ethical Discussion

Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become an accepted alternative to open repair (OR) for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) despite “hostile” anatomies that may reduce its effectiveness. Guidelines suggest refraining from EVAR in such circumstances, but in clinical practice, up to 44% of EVAR procedures are performed using stent grafts outside their instruction for use (IFU), with acceptable outcomes. Starting from this “inconsistency” between clinical practice and guidelines, the aim of this contribution is to report the technical results of the use of EVAR in challenging anatomies as well as the ethical aspects to identify the criteria by which the “best interest” of the patient can be set. Materials and Methods: A literature review on currently available evidence on standard EVAR using commercially available endografts in patients with hostile aortic neck anatomies was conducted. Medline using the PubMed interface and The Cochrane Library databases were searched from 1 January 2000 to 6 May 2021, considering the following outcomes: technical success; need for additional procedures; conversion to OR; reintervention; migration; the presence of type I endoleaks; AAA-related mortality rate. Results: A total of 52 publications were selected by the investigators for a detailed review. All studies were either prospective or retrospective observational studies reporting the immediate, 30-day, and/or follow-up outcomes of standard EVAR procedures in patients with challenging neck anatomies. No randomized trials were identified. Fourteen different endo-grafts systems were used in the selected studies. A total of 45 studies reported a technical success rate ranging from 93 to 100%, and 42 the need for additional procedures (mean value of 9.04%). Results at 30 days: the incidence rate of type Ia endoleak was reported by 37 studies with a mean value of 2.65%; 31 studies reported a null migration rate and 32 a null conversion rate to OR; in 31 of the 35 studies that reported AAA-related mortality, the incidence was null. Mid-term follow-up: the incidence rate of type Ia endoleak was reported by 48 studies with a mean value of 6.65%; 30 studies reported a null migration rate, 33 a null conversion rate to OR, and 28 of the 45 studies reported that the AAA-related mortality incidence was null. Conclusions: Based on the present analysis, EVAR appears to be a safe and effective procedure—and therefore recommendable—even in the presence of hostile anatomies, in patients deemed unfit for OR. However, in order to identify and pursue the patient’s best interest, particular attention must be paid to the management of the patient’s informed consent process, which—in addition to being an essential ethical-legal requirement to legitimize the medical act—ensures that clinical data can be integrated with the patient’s personal preferences and background, beyond the therapeutic potential of the proposed procedures and what is generically stated in the guidelines.

Association between blood flow pattern and rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm based on computational fluid dynamics

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to derive a novel classification of blood flow pattern in AAA based on computational fluid dynamics, and determine the predicting value of flow pattern in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture.

DESIGN

Age, gender matched case-control study MATERIALS: Case patients were identified as those who underwent emergent endovascular or open repair due to ruptured or impending rupture AAA. Control patients were those age and gender matched AAA patients who were asymptomatic and confirmed unruptured from CTA images from the same period.

METHODS

Classification of blood flow pattern (Type I: non-helical main flow channel with multiple vortices; Type II: non-helical main flow channel with single vortices; Type III, helical main flow channel with helical vortices) and hemodynamic parameters [areas of low wall shear stress (A _{low WSS}), aneurysm pressure drop (Δ pressure), etc.] were derived from computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analyses. Multivariate regression was used to determine independent risk factors of AAA rupture. The incremental discriminant and reclassification abilities for AAA rupture were compared among different models.

RESULTS

This study included 53 ruptured and 53 intact AAA patients. Ruptured AAA showed higher prevalence of type III flow pattern (60.38% vs. 15.09%, P<.001) compared to intact AAA. Type III flow pattern was associated with a significantly increased risk of aneurysm rupture (OR 10.22, 95%CI 3.43-30.49). Among all predicting models, combination of AAA diameter, hemodynamic parameters (A _{low WSS} or Δ pressure) and flow pattern showed highest discriminant abilities in both overall population (concordance statistic [c-index] .862) and subgroup patients with AAAs <55mm (c-index .972). Compared to AAA diameter, adding flow pattern could significantly improve the reclassification abilities in both overall population (net reclassification index [NRI] .321; p<.001) and subgroup of AAAs < 55mm (NRI .732, P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Type III flow pattern was associated with a significantly increased risk of AAA rupture. Integration of blood flow pattern may improve the identification of high-risk aneurysms in both overall population and AAAs smaller than 55mm.

Customized stent-grafts for endovascular aneurysm repair with challenging necks: A numerical proof of concept

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is a challenging intervention whose long-term success strongly depends on the appropriate stent-graft (SG) selection and sizing. Most off-the-shelf SGs are straight and cylindrical. Especially in challenging vessel morphologies, the morphology of off-the-shelf SGs is not able to meet the patient-specific demands. Advanced manufacturing technologies facilitate the development of highly customized SGs. Customized SGs that have the same morphology as the luminal vessel surface could considerably improve the quality of the EVAR outcome with reduced likelihoods of EVAR related complications such as endoleaks type I and SG migration. In this contribution, we use an in silico EVAR methodology that approximates the deployed state of the elastically deformable SG in a hyperelastic, anisotropic vessel. The in silico EVAR results of off-the-shelf SGs and customized SGs are compared qualitatively and quantitatively in terms of mechanical and geometrical parameters such as stent stresses, contact tractions, SG fixation forces and the SG-vessel attachment. In a numerical proof of concept, eight different vessel morphologies, such as a conical vessel, a barrel shaped vessel and a curved vessel, are used to demonstrate the added value of customized SGs compared to off-the-shelf SGs. The numerical investigation has shown large benefits of the highly customized SGs compared to off-the-shelf SGs with respect to a better SG-vessel attachment and a considerable increase in SG fixation forces of up to 50% which indicate decreased likelihoods of EVAR related complications. Hence, this numerical proof of concept motivates further research and development of highly customized SGs for the use in challenging vessel morphologies.

In silico study of vessel and stent-graft parameters on the potential success of endovascular aneurysm repair

The variety of stent-graft (SG) design variables (eg, SG type and degree of SG oversizing) and the complexity of decision making whether a patient is suitable for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) raise the need for the development of predictive tools to assist clinicians in the preinterventional planning phase. Recently, some in silico EVAR methods have been developed to predict the deployed SG configuration. However, only few studies investigated how to assess the in silico EVAR outcome with respect to EVAR complication likelihoods (eg, endoleaks and SG migration). Based on a large literature study, in this contribution, 20 mechanical and geometrical parameters (eg, SG drag force and SG fixation force) are defined to evaluate the quality of the in silico EVAR outcome. For a cohort of n = 146 realizations of parameterized vessel and SG geometries, the in silico EVAR results are studied with respect to these mechanical and geometrical parameters. All degrees of SG oversizing in the range between 5% and 40% are investigated continuously by a computationally efficient parameter continuation approach. The in silico investigations have shown that the mechanical and geometrical parameters are able to indicate candidates at high risk of postinterventional complications. Hence, this study provides the basis for the development of a simulation-based metric to assess the potential success of EVAR based on engineering parameters.