Pharmacokinetics of Multiple Oral Dose Divalproex Sodium after Intravenous Loading Dose Administration in Healthy Volunteers

Once-a-Day Extended-Release Dosage form of Divalproex Sodium III: Development and Validation of a Level A in Vitro–in Vivo Correlation (IVIVC)

Defining a quantitative and reliable relationship between in vitro drug release and in vivo absorption is highly desired for rational development, optimization, and evaluation of controlled-release dosage forms and manufacturing process. During the development of a once-daily extended-release (ER) tablet of divalproex sodium, a predictive in vitro drug release method was designed and statistically evaluated using three formulations with varying release rates. In order to establish an internally and externally validated Level A IVIVC, a total of five different ER formulations of divalproex sodium were used to evaluate a linear IVIVC model based on the in vitro test method. For internal validation, a single-dose four-way crossover study (N = 16) was performed using fast-, medium-, and slow-releasing ER formulations and a 12-h IV infusion of valproic acid as reference. To validate the IVIVC externally, a second three-way crossover study (N = 36) was performed using slightly-fast-, medium-, and slightly-slow-releasing ER formulations. The in vivo absorption-time profile was inferred by deconvolution of the observed plasma concentration-time profiles against the unit disposition function (UDF). A linear IVIVC model was established in which the in vivo absorption was expressed as a function of in vitro drug release. Plasma profiles of ER formulations were estimated via convolution of in vitro release profiles with the UDF. Successful internal and external validations of the model were demonstrated by individual and average absolute percent prediction errors of </=9% for both C(max) and AUC(infinity). In conclusion, a Level A IVIVC describing the entire time-course of plasma concentrations was developed and validated, both internally and externally, for ER formulations of divalproex sodium.

Once‐a‐Day Controlled‐Release Dosage Form of Divalproex Sodium II: Development of a Predictive In Vitro Drug Release Method

During formulation design of a once-daily controlled release matrix system of divalproex sodium, the in vitro dissolution test (USP II, 100 rpm, pH 6.8 buffer) was found to result in release rates that were slower than in vivo absorption. The test method also did not sufficiently discriminate formulations with different in vivo absorption rates. To develop an in vitro method that is directly correlated with in vivo absorption, statistically designed studies were carried out to investigate the effects of various in vitro testing variables on drug release using USP dissolution apparatuses. The variables studied included agitation intensity, apparatus, pH, surfactant and ionic strength of the dissolution medium. Experimental data were analyzed using ANOVA. In vitro/in vivo correlation was tested based on the hypothesis that the same linear regression equation holds for three formulations with different release rates. A mixed effects model was used in which the dependence among observations from the same subject was taken into account. Factorial studies indicated that higher pH, addition of sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) to the dissolution medium, and higher agitation intensity increased the release rate from the matrix tablet. Use of SLS not only lead to increased release rates that are more comparable to in vivo absorption rates, but also improved differentiation among formulations with varying release rates. Furthermore, drug release was also affected by interactions among the variables studied. Statistical analysis indicated that a combination of higher SLS concentration and lower pH provided enhanced differentiation between release profiles of the fast and slow releasing formulations. Based on the above findings, a new set of testing conditions was identified and demonstrated to be predictive of in vivo drug absorption for various controlled release formulations of divalproex sodium. The new method uses USP Apparatus II operating at 100 rpm in 500 mL of 0.1 N HCl for 45 min followed by 900 mL of 0.05 M phosphate buffer containing 75 mM SLS, pH 5.5, 37 +/- 0.5 degrees C. In conclusion, adjusting dissolution testing conditions to match the behavior of the formulations in vitro with that in vivo is a useful approach in identifying a predictive method in development of in vitro-in vivo correlation.

Once-a-day controlled-release dosage form of divalproex sodium I: formulation design and in vitro/in vivo investigations

Divalproex sodium is a narrow therapeutic index drug that is widely used for the treatment of epilepsy, the manic episodes associated with bipolar disorder, and prophylaxis of migraine headaches. The present investigation was undertaken to design an oral dosage form that would provide once-daily administration with improved therapy and to explore the relationships between in vitro drug release and in vivo absorption. Controlled release hydrophilic matrix formulations of divalproex sodium were designed and evaluated via in vitro and in vivo studies. The release rate of divalproex sodium was modulated by varying different rate-controlling hydrophilic polymers and measured in vitro using a USP apparatus II dissolution method. Formulations with differing release rates were studied in beagle dogs and in healthy subjects. A selected formulation given once-daily was further evaluated against the commercial enteric tablet dosed twice-daily in a multiple dose study, and shown to provide desired nearly constant therapeutic plasma concentrations over the entire 24-h dosing interval. Preliminary linear relationships between in vitro dissolution and in vivo absorption were observed in both the animal model and in humans. However, the relationships were formulation dependent, indicating a need for further studies.

Safety and tolerance of rapidly infused Depacon. A randomized trial in subjects with epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Valproate sodium injection (Depacon(R)) is an intravenous form of valproate for use in absence and complex partial seizures when circumstances preclude oral administration. Certain situations may warrant larger and more rapid infusions than permitted by the original labeling. This study evaluated the safety of more rapid infusions.

METHODS

Subjects with epilepsy were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive up to 15 mg/kg of valproate sodium infused at 3.0 or 1.5 mg/kg/min. Up to four infusions were allowed within 24 h to achieve target plasma valproate concentrations of 50-100 mcg/ml. Primary safety endpoints were the changes in the 5-min and minimum post-first infusion blood pressures (BPs).

RESULTS

One hundred twelve subjects were treated, (3.0 mg/kg/min group: n=72, 1.5 mg/kg/min group: n=40). No significant treatment differences were detected for changes in the primary BP endpoints. Two subjects in the 3.0 mg/kg/min group had potentially clinically significant low systolic BP values during the study. Similar proportions of subjects in the two groups reported adverse events during or within 6 h following the first infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Valproate sodium injection dosages up to 15 mg/kg and rates of 1.5 and 3.0 mg/kg/min were well tolerated in this population.

Comparison of the bioavailability of unequal doses of divalproex sodium extended-release formulation relative to the delayed-release formulation in healthy volunteers

Valproate formulations, divalproex sodium extended-release (ER) and the traditional divalproex sodium delayed-release (DR) formulations, are not bioequivalent. This study evaluated if ER QD regimens with 14 and 20% higher daily doses were equivalent to the corresponding DR BID regimens with respect to exposure (AUC) while achieving lower maximum concentration (C(max)) and higher minimum concentration (C(min)) values. This was a Phase I, multiple-dose, fasting, randomized, open-label, crossover design study in healthy adult volunteers (n=36). The two crossover comparisons of unequal total daily doses were: 1000 mg ER versus 875 mg DR and 1500 mg ER versus 1250 mg DR. For each of 14 and 20% higher ER versus DR dose comparisons, the ER and DR regimens were equivalent with respect to AUC. Furthermore, the ER formulation achieved a lower C(max) central value and a higher C(min) mean than the corresponding values for the DR formulation. The mean peak-to-trough fluctuations of valproic acid plasma concentrations were 42-48% lower for the ER formulation compared with the DR. The higher ER doses were as well tolerated as DR, with a small number of adverse events that were non-serious in nature and mild in intensity. Therefore, increasing the once-daily ER dose 14-20% while converting from a total daily DR dose given twice-daily results in equivalent exposure with lower C(max) and higher C(min) values.

Treatment of epilepsy in the multiply handicapped

The medical management of epilepsy in the multi-handicapped patient requires careful evaluation, classification, and pharmacologic treatment. It is estimated that 20-40% of patients with mental retardation and cerebral palsy have epilepsy. This review reports the clinical trial data and personal experience related to the use of newer AEDs in the chronic management of epilepsy syndromes in children and adults, as well as information available on the treatment of seizures in individuals with mental retardation and associated handicaps. Furthermore, clusters of seizures, prolonged seizures and status epilepticus are more commonly seen in the multiply handicapped and mentally retarded population and require special attention. The new antiepileptic drugs felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide show specific advantage in some multiply handicapped patients, be it for seizure control or medication tolerance. Furthermore, new modalities of treatment for prolonged seizures allow better efficacy both outside of hospital and within hospital facilities. The treatment of epilepsy in multi-handicapped and retarded adults and children has significantly advanced in the past few years, and much of this improvement can be attributed to improved knowledge and monitoring of new antiepileptic drugs. Conventional anticonvulsants remain first line therapy for most clinicians, but newer AEDs must broaden the therapeutic option and do allow improved therapy for some multiply handicapped patients.

New drug therapy for acute seizure management

Several new agents have recently become available for the long-term treatment of epilepsy. Until now, there has been little change for the acute management of seizures. Three new agents may alter our present practice. Fosphenytoin has recently been approved as a substitute for parenteral phenytoin. It provides similar efficacy without the risk for infusion site injury while allowing greater flexibility in intravenous solutions. Intravenous valproate adds flexibility for patients on valproate, allowing patients to be rapidly loaded. In addition, it will prevent patients from having to change seizure medications when intervening medical illness or surgery do not allow medications by mouth. Viscous diazepam solution for rectal administration will allow for safe and effective treatment for seizures at home and will potentially decrease emergency department services and hospitalization.