microRNA dynamic expression regulates invariant NKT cells

The challenges and potential of microRNA-based therapy for patients with liver failure syndromes and hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Morbidity and mortality from liver disease continues to rise worldwide. There are currently limited curative treatments for patients with liver failure syndromes, encompassing acute liver failure and decompensated cirrhosis states, outside of transplantation. Whilst there have been improvements in therapeutic options for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there remain challenges necessitating novel therapeutic agents. microRNA have long been seen as potential therapeutic targets but there has been limited clinical translation.

AREAS COVERED

We will discuss the limitations of conventional non-transplant management of patients with liver failure syndromes and HCC. We will provide an overview of microRNA and the challenges in developing and delivering microRNA-based therapeutic agents. We will finally provide an overview of microRNA-based therapeutic agents which have progressed to clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

microRNA have great potential to be developed into therapeutic agents due to their association with critical biological processes which govern health and disease. Utilizing microRNA sponges to target multiple microRNA associated with specific biological processes may improve their therapeutic efficacy. However, there needs to be significant improvements in delivery systems to ensure the safe delivery of microRNA to target sites and minimize systemic distribution. This currently significantly impacts the clinical translation of microRNA-based therapeutic agents.

The challenges and potential in developing microRNA associated with regeneration as biomarkers to improve prognostication for liver failure syndromes and hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Determining the need for liver transplantation remains critical in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver failure syndromes (including acute liver failure and decompensated cirrhosis states). Conventional prognostic models utilize biomarkers of liver and non-liver failure and have limitations in their application. Novel biomarkers which predict regeneration may fulfil this niche. microRNA are implicated in health and disease and are present in abundance in the circulation. Despite this, they have not translated into mainstream clinical biomarkers.

AREAS COVERED

We will discuss current challenges in the prognostication of patients with liver failure syndromes as well as for patients with HCC. We will discuss biomarkers implicated with liver regeneration. We then provide an overview of the challenges in developing microRNA into clinically tractable biomarkers. Finally, we will provide a scoping review of microRNA which may have potential as prognostic biomarkers in liver failure syndromes and HCC.

EXPERT OPINION

Novel biomarkers are needed to improve prognostic models in liver failure syndromes and HCC. Biomarkers associated with liver regeneration are currently lacking and may fulfil this niche. microRNA have the potential to be developed into clinically tractable biomarkers but a consensus on standardizing methodology and reporting is required prior to large-scale studies.

Current insights in mouse iNKT and MAIT cell development using single cell transcriptomics data

Innate T (T_inn) cells are a collection of T cells with important regulatory functions that have a crucial role in immunity towards tumors, bacteria, viruses, and in cell-mediated autoimmunity. In mice, the two main αβ T_inn cell subsets include the invariant NKT (iNKT) cells that recognize glycolipid antigens presented by non-polymorphic CD1d molecules and the mucosal associated invariant T (MAIT) cells that recognize vitamin B metabolites presented by the non-polymorphic MR1 molecules. Due to their ability to promptly secrete large quantities of cytokines either after T cell antigen receptor (TCR) activation or upon exposure to tissue- and antigen-presenting cell-derived cytokines, T_inn cells are thought to act as a bridge between the innate and adaptive immune systems and have the ability to shape the overall immune response. Their swift response reflects the early acquisition of helper effector programs during their development in the thymus, independently of pathogen exposure and prior to taking up residence in peripheral tissues. Several studies recently profiled, in an unbiased manner, the transcriptomes of mouse thymic iNKT and MAIT cells at the single cell level. Based on these data, we re-examine in this review how T_inn cells develop in the mouse thymus and undergo effector differentiation.

Bivalent Regulation and Related Mechanisms of H3K4/27/9me3 in Stem Cells

The "bivalent domain" is a unique histone modification region consisting of two histone tri-methylation modifications. Over the years, it has been revealed that the maintenance and dynamic changes of the bivalent domains play a vital regulatory role in the differentiation of various stem cell systems, as well as in other cells, such as immunomodulation. Tri-methylation modifications involved in the formation of the bivalent domains are interrelated and mutually regulated, thus regulating many life processes of cells. Tri-methylation of histone H3 at lysine 4 (H3K4me3), tri-methylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 (H3K9me3) and tri-methylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27me3) are the main tri-methylation modifications involved in the formation of bivalent domains. The three form different bivalent domains in pairs. Furthermore, it is equally clear that H3K4me3 is a positive regulator of transcription and that H3K9me3/H3K27me3 are negative regulators. Enzymes related to the regulation of histone methylation play a significant role in the "homeostasis" and "breaking homeostasis" of the bivalent domains. Bivalent domains regulate target genes, upstream transcription, downstream targeting regulation and related cytokines during the establishment and breakdown of homeostasis, and exert the specific regulation of stem cells. Indeed, a unified mechanism to explain the bivalent modification in all stem cells has been difficult to define, and whether the bivalent modification is antagonistic in inducing the differentiation of homologous stem cells is controversial. In this review, we focus on the different bivalent modifications in several key stem cells and explore the main mechanisms and effects of these modifications involved. Finally, we discussed the close relationship between bivalent domains and immune cells, and put forward the prospect of the application of bivalent domains in the field of stem cells.