Concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma : A matched-pair multicenter analysis of outcomes

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with additional chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A pooled analysis of propensity score-matching studies

OBJECTIVE

To determine the benefits of adding induction chemotherapy (IC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) based on propensity score-matching (PSM) studies.

METHODS

Eligible PSM studies were searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases from inception to September 1, 2020. The primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS).

RESULTS

A total of 14 trials consisting of 4086 participants were included. Significant benefits were observed between IC + CCRT and CCRT for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.91) and DMFS (HR, 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64-0.94) with the exception of LRFS (HR, 1.14; 95% CI: 0.90-1.43). However, CCRT + AC did not achieve significant improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

IC with CCRT yields significant survival benefits in terms of OS and DMFS, whereas CCRT with AC fails to achieve any additional benefit in all endpoints.

The Current Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is one of the most common malignant tumors of the head and neck, and it originates from the mucous epithelium of the nasopharynx. Because it is "hidden", the symptoms of NPC can easily be missed, and more than 70% of patients present with locally advanced disease at diagnosis. Concurrent radiation therapy with chemotherapy can significantly improve regional control of NPC. At present, distant metastasis is the main cause of treatment failure. At the end of the 20th century, clinical trial No. IG0099 in the United States confirmed the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for the first time. However, in the past 20 years, various clinical trials and meta-analyses conducted globally have yielded contradictory results regarding the effect of AC on locally advanced NPC. AC has changed from category 1 to the current category 2A in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, and it remains controversial whether AC can significantly improve the survival of NPC patients. Here, we comprehensively analyzed the role of AC in locally advanced NPC by comparing some treatment methods. We conclude the role of AC in treating locally advanced NPC, based on the studies presented, remains undefined but is associated with increased toxicity.

The Double-Edge Role of the Addition of Adjuvant Chemotherapy to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in the Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Purpose

To construct a prognostic index (PI) for overall survival (OS) to stratify nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) into high-risk and low-risk groups. We also applied the model to investigate the role of the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) regimens for the treatment of NPC.

Methods

A prognostic model was established based on a retrospective study of 362 patients from January 2008 to June 2011. The discriminative and calibration abilities of the model were evaluated by Harrell's concordance index (C-index), and calibration curves. Bootstrapping was used to perform for internal validation. External validation was conducted using 324 patients diagnosed with NPC from July 2011 to December 2012 at the same institution. Survival analyses were performed between CCRT-AC and CCRT alone groups for the high-risk and low-risk groups.

Results

The primary PI comprised covariates that were associated with OS in the training cohort, including T stage, N stage, age, and plasma alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Internal and external validation showed that the discrimination of the PI for OS was significantly better than that of the 8th edition AJCC staging system. Discretization by using a fixed PI score cut-off of 407.96 determined from the training data set yielded high- and low-risk subgroups with distinct OS outcomes in the validation cohort. Adjuvant chemotherapy improved OS in high-risk patients (HR 0.620, 95% CI 0.408 to 0.941; P = 0.023) but increased the risk of distant metastasis (HR, 4.222, 95% CI, 0.959 to 18.585; P = 0.038) in low-risk patients.

Conclusion

The proposed prognostic model achieved good prediction and calibration of OS for patients with NPC. The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy might be a double-edged sword, bringing survival benefit to high-risk patients but greater risk of distant metastasis to low-risk patients.

Revalidation of a prognostic score model based on complete blood count for nasopharyngeal carcinoma through a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

In our previous work, we incorporated complete blood count (CBC) into TNM stage to develop a new prognostic score model, which was validated to improve prediction efficiency of TNM stage for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The purpose of this study was to revalidate the accuracy of the model, and its superiority to TNM stage, through data from a prospective study.

METHODS

CBC of 249 eligible patients from the 863 Program No. 2006AA02Z4B4 was evaluated. Prognostic index (PI) of each patient was calculated according to the score model. Then they were divided by the PI into three categories: the low-, intermediate-and high-risk patients. The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) of the three categories was compared by a log-rank test. The model and TNM stage (7th edition) were compared on efficiency for predicting the 5-year DSS, through comparison of the area under curve (AUC) of their receiver-operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

The 5-year DSS of the low-, intermediate-and high-risk patients were 96.0%, 79.1% and 62.2%, respectively. The low-and intermediate-risk patients had better DSS than the high-risk patients (P<0.001 and P<0.005, respectively). And there was a trend of better DSS in the low-risk patients, compared with the intermediate-risk patients (P=0.049). The AUC of the model was larger than that of TNM stage (0.726 vs. 0.661, P=0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

A CBC-based prognostic score model was revalidated to be accurate and superior to TNM stage on predicting 5-year DSS of NPC.