[Assessment of psychiatric emergencies by physicians in the pre-hospital emergency medical system. A re-evaluation after 7 years]

[Analysis of the German state medical examination regarding psychiatrically relevant topics]

BACKGROUND

The second part of the state medical examination is an essential part of medical education in Germany. From 2006 until 2013, the second and third parts of the licensing examination were combined, thus earning this examination the reputation of being notoriously difficult to pass. The aim of this exploratory study was to examine psychiatric and psychotherapeutic questions in the written part of the second examination.

OBJECTIVES

This study analyzed the proportion of psychiatric and psychotherapeutic questions in the written part of the second leg of the German state medical examination. In a second step, a more detailed analysis aimed to identify more specific subject areas and to allocate diagnoses according to ICD-10, allowing a detailed overview of the presence of psychiatric topics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 8 examinations from fall 2010 up to spring 2014 a were included in the analysis. Every examination comprised 320 questions, thus a total of 2560 questions were analyzed. All questions pertaining to psychiatric or psychotherapeutic topics were included. Questions were categorized according to a predefined set of subject areas and an ICD-10 diagnosis.

RESULTS

Out of the total of 2560 questions analyzed, 166 were categorized as being in psychiatry or psychotherapy, with each examination comprising an average of 20.75 (SD = 5.80) relevant questions. Most questions were allocated to the subject area of pharmacology (n = 53), followed by psychopathologic assessment (n = 27) and psychotherapy (n = 12). Sorted according to ICD-10 criteria, most questions could be assigned to the F3 category, the affective disorders group (21.9 %, n = 35).

CONCLUSION

In comparison to the actual strain placed on the healthcare system, the results indicate an underrepresentation of psychiatric disorders in the second part of the German state medical examination. The distribution of specific disorders mirrors the actual distribution at least in part; however, certain practically relevant disorders are severely underrepresented.

[The situation of emergency psychiatry in Germany]

The impact of psychiatric emergencies for the care of patients in preclinical emergency medicine, in emergency departments and in psychiatric hospitals has been underestimated for a long time. There is still insufficient knowledge and a need for further research. There are, however, sufficient reasons to assume that annually approximately 500,000 patients with a psychiatric emergency receive treatment from a preclinical emergency physician and another 1.5 million in emergency departments in Germany. Further, approximately 500,000 patients are admitted to psychiatric hospitals as an emergency. The most frequent reasons are intoxication, agitation, aggressiveness and suicidal ideation, posing a threat of self-harm to the patient or to other persons and evoking other life-threatening conditions. Emergency psychiatry also plays a role in collective injuries, such as mass disasters, catastrophes and rampage situations. There is some evidence that the number of psychiatric emergencies is increasing. Reasons are, among others, changes in the services provided for inpatient and outpatient treatment, a reduction in stabilizing psychosocial factors and a general increase in the utilization of emergency healthcare services.

[Necessity for treatment of psychiatric emergencies in the emergency medical service. Evaluation of the "indicator for psychiatric pharmacotherapy"]

BACKGROUND

Psychiatric emergency situations (PES) are common in the physician-based emergency medical system (EMS) in Germany. However, many emergency physicians (EP) feel insecure in assessing the necessity for treatment of these patients. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate whether a short, newly developed questionnaire (Indicator for Psychiatric Pharmacotherapy, IPP) is able to help EPs in deciding for or against pharmacological treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The protocols of the EMS at the Saarland University Hospital were prospectively collected over a 1-year period and PESs were identified and analyzed in detail. The 7-item IPP, which focuses on the most relevant psychiatric symptoms, was to be completed for each PES.

RESULTS

Among all calls for an EP (2,114) 250 (11.8%) were classified as a PES. The most frequent diagnoses were alcoholic intoxication, state of agitation and suicide attempts. Of the IPP questionnaires 193 could be evaluated and in 31.2% of all PESs a specific psychiatric medication was administered. These patients scored significantly higher in the IPP compared to those who did not receive medication (8.0 ± 3.9 compared to 5.6 ± 3.2, p < 0.001). The IPP items "anxiety", "agitation/aggression", "mood" and "physical symptoms/disorders" had the highest impact on the administration of psychotherapeutic drugs.

DISCUSSION

The IPP can be a valuable tool to assess the necessity of pharmacological treatment for patients in PESs. The assessment of the symptom categories "anxiety", "agitation/aggression", "mood" and "physical symptoms/disorders" seems to be sufficient to estimate a need for treatment.

[Efficacy of the emergency unit's filter function in patients with psychiatric symptoms]

The fundamental functions of the recently established emergency units/departments include the initial assessment, triage, commencement of treatment and referral for admission to the hospital.

AIM

The aim of the study was to analyze psychiatric cases assessed at the department of emergency with particular reference to misdiagnoses and the reasons why emergency physicians failed to reach correct diagnoses.

METHOD

This is a chart review of patients with psychiatric diagnoses evaluated at the Department of Emergency, Mohács City Hospital during 2006. These patients were followed through the electronic database of the hospital and their socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 596 patients who were considered primarily psychiatric cases during 2006, 289 (49%) were admitted to the psychiatric ward, 182 (30%) were referred to outpatient treatment, and 125 (21%) were misdiagnosed and proved to be non-psychiatric emergencies and eventually ended up in other wards (75 patients in internal medicine, 20 in neurology, 12 in intensive care, and 18 in other units).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the diagnostic and triage functions of the department of emergency were satisfactory in psychiatric cases. Medical emergencies that were frequently mistaken for psychiatric cases (e.g. atypical pneumonia, sensory aphasia) deserve particular attention. The authors emphasize the importance of the close collaboration of different medical areas involved in emergency assessment and treatment.

Psychiatric emergencies in prehospital emergency medical systems: a prospective comparison of two urban settings

BACKGROUND

Psychiatric emergency situations (PES) are of high importance to the German prehospital physician-based emergency medical system. So far, however, no prospective studies regarding the incidence of PES have been performed, neither have effects of training programs on diagnostic and therapeutic accuracy been studied.

METHOD

The protocols of two emergency medical services (EMS) were collected and analyzed prospectively. Emergency physicians (EPs) in Kaiserslautern (KL) attended a standardized educational program and underwent daily supervision. EPs in Homburg (HOM) had not been informed about the study. In KL, sociodemographic variables were collected. An investigator who was not involved in the individual EMS mission assessed the correct classification of PES.

RESULTS

Among all calls for an EP, 11.8% were classified as PES. There was no difference between the two centers. Correct classification of PES in KL was significantly higher than that in HOM (94.3% vs. 80.6%). Documentation of suicidal behavior was deficient in both centers. EPs in KL gave verbal crisis intervention significantly more often, administered less medication overall, and dispensed more specific drugs in psychotic disorders and significantly less drugs in substance abuse disorders. Patients were more often treated at the scene and were less often transported to a hospital. Some sociodemographic variables were associated with psychiatric morbidity of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Accounting for 12% of all missions, psychiatric emergencies are a frequent reason for calls for EPs, equaling trauma-related and neurological emergencies. The most frequent reasons for calls were alcohol intoxication, states of agitation and suicidal behavior. The diagnostic and therapeutic accuracy of EPs may be improved with a concise standardized teaching program.