Cementless fixation in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis sought to compare the efficacy of cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty(UKA) for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the following databases was conducted: Pubmed, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Embase, the Web of Science, and MEDLINE. The objective was to identify literature comparing cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis. Duplicate literature, low-quality literature, literature with incompatible observations, and literature for which the full text was not available were excluded. Two independent researchers employed the Cochrane Risk Assessment Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of the included literature. The data then were extracted and subsequently meta-analyzed using RevMan 5.4.

RESULTS

A total of 12 papers were included in the analysis, encompassing a cumulative of 2558 cumulative cases. Of these, 1258 were cemented and 1300 were cementless. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the outcomes of cemented versus cementless Oxford UKA. The Oxford UKA group exhibited a significantly longer surgery time than the cementless Oxford UKA group [mean difference (MD) = 9.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) (7.64,12.17)]. Additionally, the cemented Oxford UKA group demonstrated a significantly lower knee OKS score compared to the cementless Oxford UKA group. The mean difference (MD) was - 1.58 (95% CI: -2.30, -0.86), indicating a significantly lower score for the cemented Oxford UKA group. Similarly, the mean difference (MD) was - 1.8 for the knee KSS clinical score, indicating a significantly lower score for the cemented Oxford UKA group. The results demonstrated that the knee KSS functional score was significantly lower in the cemented Oxford UKA group than in the cementless Oxford UKA group [MD=-1.72, 95% CI (-3.26, -0.37)]. 95% CI (-3.27,-0.17)], the cemented Oxford UKA group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of radiolucent lines around the prosthesis than the cementless Oxford UKA group [ratio of ratios (OR) = 3.62, 95% CI (1.08,12.13)]. The revision rate was significantly higher in the cemented Oxford UKA group than in the cementless Oxford UKA group [OR = 2.22, 95% CI (1.40,3.53)]. However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of reoperation rate, five-year prosthesis survival rate, and complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicated that, in comparison to cemented Oxford UKA, cementless Oxford UKA resulted in a reduction in surgical time, an improvement in knee OKS score, KSS clinical score, and KSS functional score, and a decrease in the incidence of periprosthetic radiolucent lines and the rate of revisions.

Comparison of survival between cemented vs cementless unicompartimental knee arthroplasty: a case control study with propensity score matching

INTRODUCTION

The first results of cementless prosthesis were rather disappointing. However recent progress in methods of cementless fixation of prosthesis should lead to better results in terms of survival of these prostheses. The main objective is to compare the survival rate at last follow-up of UKA with cemented tibial or cementless.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesize that UKAs with uncemented tibial implants have better survival compared to UKAs with cemented tibial implants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This single center case-control study included 94 medial UKA with a cemented tibial component that were paired by propensity score matching to 94 medial UKA with a uncemented tibial component. The main evaluation criterion was the comparison of the survivorship of the UKA between a cemented tibial implant and those with a cementless tibial implant in terms of all-cause revision surgery at last follow-up. The secondary endpoints were the analysis of the causes of failure.

RESULTS

The mean final follow-up was 6.1years (2.3). The overall survival rate in our serie of medial UKA was 92.4% [88.7%-96.3%] at five years. The overall survival rate in cemented group was and 91.5% [86.0%-97.3%] at five years and at 93.2% [88.1%-98.7%] at five years, in the uncemented group. No differences significant were observed in the two groups (p.value = 0.6). Only the tibial preoperative deformity was a risk factor of failure (HR: 1.11 [1.02,1.20], value = 0.02).

DISCUSSION

The use of a cemented or a cementless tibial component in a medial UKA did not influence the survival rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; case control study.

Advantages and limitations of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an overview of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Interest in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has recently grown. Mobile bearing UKA, in which the bearing is not fixed but rather perfectly conforms with femoral and tibial components and moves completely passively between the femoral and tibial implant, has now been used for approximately half a century.

AREAS COVERED

Alongside the recognized advantages of UKA, the mobile-bearing variant benefits from an extremely low rate of polyethylene wear and tolerable minor malalignment. Revision rates for UKA have been reported to exceed those of total knee arthroplasty, but long-term survival rates and outcomes from mobile-bearing UKA have been found to be satisfactory. In addition to the lateral osteoarthritis and loosening, which are main complications of UKA, bearing dislocation is a specific complication of mobile bearing UKA. Fractures and valgus subsidence are more prevalent than in the cementless UKA. While these continue to be features to be addressed, they have been partially solved.

EXPERT OPINION

Given the manifold benefits of UKA, its application could be extended to a larger patient population. Successful outcomes rely on careful patient selection and the surgeon's extensive familiarity with the procedure. Looking ahead, the incorporation of robotic surgery, already a feature of some fixed-bearing UKAs, might shape the future trajectory of mobile-bearing UKA.

Comparison of the early postoperative outcomes of cementless and cemented medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Aims

The primary objective of this registry-based study was to compare patient-reported outcomes of cementless and cemented medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) during the first postoperative year. The secondary objective was to assess one- and three-year implant survival of both fixation techniques.

Methods

We analyzed 10,862 cementless and 7,917 cemented UKA cases enrolled in the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry, operated between 2017 and 2021. Pre- to postoperative change in outcomes at six and 12 months' follow-up were compared using mixed model analyses. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were applied to quantify differences in implant survival. Adjustments were made for patient-specific variables and annual hospital volume.

Results

Change from baseline in the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and activity-related pain was comparable between groups. Adjustment for covariates demonstrated a minimally greater decrease in rest-related pain in the cemented group (β = -0.09 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.16 to -0.01)). Cementless fixation was associated with a higher probability of achieving an excellent OKS outcome (> 41 points) (adjusted odds ratio 1.2 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.3)). The likelihood of one-year implant survival was greater for cemented implants (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.35 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.71)), with higher revision rates for periprosthetic fractures of cementless implants. During two to three years' follow-up, the likelihood of implant survival was non-significantly greater for cementless UKA (adjusted HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.40 to 1.04)), primarily due to increased revision rates for tibial loosening of cemented implants.

Conclusion

Cementless and cemented medial UKA led to comparable improvement in physical function and pain reduction during the initial postoperative year, albeit with a greater likelihood of achieving excellent OKS outcomes after cementless UKA. Anticipated differences in early physical function and pain should not be a decisive factor in the choice of fixation technique. However, surgeons should consider the differences in short- and long-term implant survival when deciding which implant to use.

Unicompartmental knee replacement: controversies and technical considerations

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is one of the effective interventions for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Moreover, it has multiple advantages over total knee arthroplasty (TKA), including reduced intraoperative blood loss, decreased risk of transfusion, and faster recovery. This study aimed to discuss critical technical considerations regarding UKR and some of the controversies and updates.

METHODS

We conducted a review to provide an overview of the controversies and technical considerations about UKR in several aspects. Only peer-reviewed articles were included, up to December 2023 using PubMed, Google Scholar, ERIC, and Cochrane database for systematic reviews databases.

RESULT

UKR is associated with superior patient-reported clinical and functional outcomes, as well as shorter hospital stays, fewer postoperative complications, and revealed favorable outcomes in patients' return to sport. The choice between mobile- and fixed-bearing prostheses depends, in part, on the surgeon's preference. The mobile-bearing UKR is a less constrained prosthesis and can potentially result in less wear, but it is more technically demanding. While no significant difference between mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing prostheses, cementless is superior to cemented design. Furthermore, UKR can be a good alternative for high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and still can be considered after a failed HTO. Lastly, recent reviews have shown a revision rate comparable to that of TKA. This is probably influenced by Improved comprehension of the best indications, patient selection criteria, as well as of the design, materials, and technological advances.

CONCLUSION

UKR treatment for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis is secure and effective. Based on clinical and functional outcomes, decreased morbidity and mortality, and cost-effectiveness, long-term studies suggest that UKR is superior to TKA. Further investigation in this area is warranted.

Ten-Year Survivorship and Patient Satisfaction Following Robotic-Arm-Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Robotic-arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been shown to result in high short- and mid-term survivorship. However, it is not known whether these outcomes are maintained at long-term follow-up. This study aimed to evaluate long-term implant survivorship, modes of failure, and patient satisfaction following robotic-arm-assisted medial UKA.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter study of 474 consecutive patients (531 knees) undergoing robotic-arm-assisted medial UKA was conducted. A cemented, fixed-bearing system with a metal-backed onlay tibial implant was used in all cases. Patients were contacted at 10-year follow-up to determine implant survivorship and satisfaction. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier models.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed for 366 patients (411 knees) with a mean follow-up of 10.2 ± 0.4 years. A total of 29 revisions were reported, corresponding to a 10-year survivorship of 91.7% (95% confidence interval, 88.8% to 94.6%). Of all revisions, 26 UKAs were revised to total knee arthroplasty. Unexplained pain and aseptic loosening were the most commonly reported modes of failure, accounting for 38% and 35% of revisions, respectively. Of patients without revision, 91% were either satisfied or very satisfied with their overall knee function.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective multicenter study found high 10-year survivorship and patient satisfaction following robotic-arm-assisted medial UKA. Pain and fixation failure remained common causes for revision following cemented fixed-bearing medial UKA, despite the use of a robotic-arm-assisted technique. Prospective comparative studies are needed to assess the clinical value of robotic assistance over conventional techniques in UKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The effect of activity on the outcome of cementless mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacements

BACKGROUND

Many surgeons consider high activity levels a contraindication to Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR). Cementless fixation is of particular concern given the lack of cement to augment primary stability. We assessed the effect of pre and post-operative activity levels on the outcomes of cementless UKRs.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 1000 medial cementless mobile bearing UKR were analysed. Patients were categorised by their pre-operative and highest post-operative Tegner Activity Score (TAS) and results compared between groups. Outcomes of interest included implant survival, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the American Knee Society Score - Objective/Functional (AKSS-O/F).

RESULTS

Increasing post-operative activity were not associated with higher revision rates. The 10-year survival of the high activity group (TAS ≥ 5, 96.7% (CI 91.3-98.8), and low/medium activity group (TAS ≤ 4, 98.1% (CI 96.5-99.0)) were not significantly different (p = 0.57). The mean 10-year OKS of the high activity group (46.5, SD 3.1) was significantly (p < 0.001) higher than that of the low/medium activity group (41.3, SD 7.7). There was a significant trend for increasing activity being associated with increasing AKSS-F at 5-years (p < 0.001) and 10 years (p = 0.01) and increasing AKSS-O at 5 years (p < 0.001). Higher pre-operative activity did not significantly increase revision rates and resulted in significantly higher 5-year post-operative scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither higher pre-operative nor post-operative activity were associated with increased revision rates, but both were associated with better post-operative function. Therefore activity should not be considered a contraindication to cementless mobile bearing UKR and not be restricted post-operatively.

Survivorship, clinical outcomes and indications for revision in uncemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: systematic review

Modern uncemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) relies on the mechanics of the implant design and a biological bond at the bone-implant interface to create a secure fixation of its components. The aim of this systematic review was to determine implant survivorship, clinical outcomes and indications for revision in uncemented UKAs. A search strategy was employed using keywords related to UKAs and uncemented fixation to identify suitable studies. Both prospective and retrospective studies with a minimum of two year mean follow-up were included. Data was gathered on study design, implant type, patient demographics, survivorship, clinical outcome scores and the indications for revision. Methodological quality was assessed using a ten-point risk of bias scoring tool. Eighteen studies were included in the final review. The mean follow-up of studies ranged between 2-11 years. The primary outcome of survival demonstrated 5 year survivorship ranged between 91.7-100.0% and 10-year survivorship between 91.0-97.5%. Clinical and functional outcome scores were found to be excellent in the majority of studies with the remaining reporting good results. Revisions represented 2.7% of the total operations performed. There were 145 revisions with an overall revision rate of 0.8 per 100 observed component years. Osteoarthritis disease progression (30.2%) and bearing dislocations (23.8%) were the most common causes of implant failure. This review finds uncemented UKAs demonstrate comparable survivorship, clinical outcomes and safety profile to cemented UKAs to consider this fixation a suitable alternative in clinical use.

Clinical and Functional Results of Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with a Minimum Follow Up of 5 Years-A Consecutive Cohort of 201 Patients

The number of unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR) is increasing. Alongside various advantages, the revision rate of cemented UKR is higher compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKR). In contrast, cementless fixation shows reduced revision rates, compared to the cemented UKR. However, most of the recent literature is based on designer-dependent studies. In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, we investigated patients who underwent cementless Oxford UKR (OUKR) between 2012 and 2016 in our hospital with a minimum follow-up of five years. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the OKS, AKSS-O, AKSS-F, FFbH-OA, UCLA, SF-36, EQ-5D-3L, FJS, ROM, pain, and satisfaction measures. Survival analysis was performed with reoperation and revision as endpoints. We included 201 patients (216 knees) for clinical evaluation. All outcome parameters increased significantly from pre- to postoperative stages. The five-year survival rate was 96.1% for revision surgery and 94.9% for reoperation. The main reasons for revision were the progression of osteoarthritis, inlay dislocation, and tibial overstuffing. Two iatrogenic tibial fractures appeared. Cementless OUKR shows excellent clinical outcome and high survival rates after five years. The tibial plateau fracture in cementless UKR represents a serious complication and requires modification of the surgical technique.

Analysis of different geometrical features to achieve close-to-bone stiffness material properties in medical device: A feasibility numerical study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In orthopedic medical devices, elasto-plastic behavior differences between bone and metallic materials could lead to mechanical issues at the bone-implant interface, as stress shielding. Those issue are mainly related to knee and hip arthroplasty, and they could be responsible for implant failure. To reduce mismatching-related adverse events between bone and prosthesis mechanical properties, modifying the implant's internal geometry varying the bulk stiffness and density could be the right approach. Therefore, this feasibility study aims to assess which in-body gap geometry improves, by reducing, the bulk stiffness.

METHODS

Using five finite element models, a uniaxial compression test in five cubes with a 20 mm thickness was simulated and analyzed. The displacements, strain and Young Modulus were calculated in four cubes, each containing internal prismatic gaps with different transversal sections (squared, hexagonal, octagonal, and circular). Those were compared with a fifth full-volume cube used as control.

RESULTS

The most significant difference have been achieved in displacement values, in cubes containing internal gaps with hexagonal and circular transversal sections (82 µm and 82.5 µm, respectively), when compared to the full-volume cube (69.3 µm).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that hexagonal and circular shape of the gaps allows obtaining the lower rigidity in a size range of 4 mm, offering a starting approach to achieve a "close-to-bone" material, with a potential use in prosthetic devices with limited thickness.

The effect of age on the outcomes of cementless mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacements

PURPOSE

Unicompartmental Knee Replacements (UKR) are being performed in patients with increasing demands and life expectancies with surgical concerns that cemented fixation will not last. Cementless fixation may offer a solution, but the results in different age groups have not been assessed. The effect of age at surgery on the outcomes of cementless UKRs was investigated.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 1000 medial cementless mobile bearing UKR were analysed. Patients were categorised into four age groups (< 55, 55 to < 65, 65 to < 75 and ≥ 75 years). Implant survival was assessed using endpoints reoperation, revision and major revision requiring revision knee replacement components. Functional outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

10 year cumulative revision rate for the < 55, 55 to < 65, 65 to < 75 and ≥ 75 groups were 2.1% (CI 0.6-6.1), 1.8% (CI 0.6-5.3), 3.2% (CI 1.5-6.5) and 4.1% (1.7-9.6) with no differences between groups (p = 0.52). Two of the 22 revisions were considered major. The 10 year cumulative reoperation rates were 4.5% (CI 2.0-10.0), 3.0% (CI 1.3-6.5), 3.8% (CI 2.0-7.1) and 4.1% (CI 1.7-9.6) with no differences between groups (p = 0.81). The 10 year median Oxford Knee Scores were 42.5, 46.5, 45 and 42.5, respectively. The 10 year median Objective American Knee Society Scores were 95 for all age groups.

CONCLUSION

The cementless mobile bearing UKR has low reoperation and revision rates and similar functional outcomes in all age groups. Cementless UKR should be used in all age groups and age should not be considered a contraindication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty results in higher pain levels compared to the cemented technique: a prospective register study

PURPOSE

In recent years, the preferred fixation method for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has changed from cemented to cementless. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) from the cemented versus cementless techniques two- and twelve-months post-operation.

METHODS

From 2015 to 2019, 187 cemented and 261 cementless UKAs were included based on an institutional registry. The Oxford Unicompartmental Knee System™ (Zimmer Biomet, Bridgend, United Kingdom) was used for all patients. Three experienced surgeons performed all procedures. Data were collected pre- and peroperatively, and at two- and twelve-months postoperatively. PROMs included pain (evaluated on a numeric rating scale [NRS] during activity and at rest), and knee function (evaluated with the disease-specific short form of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS-PS]). Patients also rated postoperative joint function (better, unchanged, uncertain or worse) and were asked, "based on your experience to date, would you go through the surgery again?". Duration of surgery was noted and revisions during the first post-operative year were evaluated.

RESULTS

The cemented group reported significantly lower activity-related pain at both two- and twelve-month follow-up. This was also the case for pain at rest at twelve-month follow-up, and KOOS-PS at two-month follow-up. Duration of surgery (adjusted for surgeon differences) was eight minutes less on average with the cementless technique. Eleven prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) were found following the cementless fixation technique compared to three using the cemented implant.

CONCLUSION

UKA cases with cemented implants had lower pain scores during activity two and twelve months after surgery compared with those who had cementless implants. Differences in favor of the cemented group were also found for pain at rest one year after surgery and for KOOS-PS two months after. Surgery was significantly shorter in duration in the cementless group, but a relatively high number of PJIs were found in that same group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Cementless unicompartmental knee replacement achieves better ten-year clinical outcomes than cemented: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to report and compare the long-term revision rate, revision indications and patient reported outcome measures of cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR).

METHODS

Databases Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central of Controlled Trials were searched to identify all UKR studies reporting the ≥ 10 year clinical outcomes. Revision rates per 100 component years [% per annum (% pa)] were calculated by fixation type and then, subgroup analyses for fixed and mobile bearing UKRs were performed. Mechanisms of failure and patient reported outcome measures are reported.

RESULTS

25 studies were eligible for inclusion with a total of 10,736 UKRs, in which there were 8790 cemented and 1946 cementless knee replacements. The revision rate was 0.73% pa (CI 0.66-0.80) and 0.45% pa (CI 0.34-0.58) per 100 component years, respectively, with the cementless having a significantly (p < 0.001) lower overall revision rate. Therefore, based on these studies, the expected 10-year survival of cementless UKR would be 95.5% and cemented 92.7%. Subgroup analysis revealed this difference remained significant for the Oxford UKR (0.37% pa vs 0.77% pa, p < 0.001), but for non-Oxford UKRs there were no significant differences in revision rates of cemented and cementless UKRs (0.57% pa vs 0.69% pa, p = 0.41). Mobile bearing UKRs had significantly lower revision rates than fixed bearing UKRs in cementless (p = 0.001), but not cemented groups (p = 0.13). Overall the revision rates for aseptic loosening and disease progression were significantly lower (p = 0.02 and p = 0.009 respectively) in the cementless group compared to the cemented group (0.06 vs 0.13% pa and 0.10 vs 0.21% pa respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Cementless fixation had reduced long-term revision rates compared to cemented for the Oxford UKR. For the non-Oxford UKRs, the revision rates of cementless and cemented fixation types were equivalent. Therefore, cementless UKRs offer at least equivalent if not lower revision rates compared to cemented UKRs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Long-term survival rate of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy with high valgus correction: a 15-year follow-up study

PURPOSE

The influence of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW-HTO) with high valgus correction on its survival is unclear. This study aimed to conduct a 15-year follow-up cohort study to estimate the long-term survival rate of CW-HTO. Factors related to poor outcomes were investigated.

METHODS

A total of 159 knees in 123 patients were followed up, and 120 knees in 96 patients were enrolled for statistical analysis. Femorotibial angles were measured by standing anterior-posterior radiographs of the knee. Clinical objective evaluation was performed by the Japanese orthopaedic association (JOA) score of the knee, and scores lower than 70 points defined the poor result (PR) group. The survival rate of OW-HTO was estimated. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the risk factors for PR and conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

RESULTS

A total of 16 knees in 15 patients (13.3%) underwent TKA 14.0 ± 4.8 (4-20) years after CW-HTO. The 5-year survival rate was 99.2%, 10-year was 96.7%, 15-year was 92.5%, and 86.7% at final follow-up (17.9 years). Based on the JOA score, 44 patients (35.8%) belonged to the PR group, and their risk factors were obesity (p = 0.018), low femorotibial angle (p = 0.019), low JOA score (p = 0.040), low knee extension angle (p = 0.045), and low knee flexion angle (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

The 15-year survival rate of CW-HTO was 92.5%. While higher scores of objective outcomes were kept over long-term follow-up, the risk factors for a worsening score or TKA conversion were obesity and severity of preoperative knee symptoms.

Prior high tibial osteotomy is not a contraindication for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To report on the outcome and complications of minimal invasive medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) after failed prior high tibial osteotomy (HTO) as treatment for medial osteoarthritis in the knee. The hypothesis was that good results can be achieved, if no excessive postoperative valgus alignment and abnormal proximal tibial geometry is present.

METHODS

All medial UKAs after failed prior HTO (n = 30), performed between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were followed for revision surgery and survival of the UKA (defined as revision to TKA). Clinical examination using the Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), as well as radiological examination was performed. Radiographs were studied and the influence of the demographic factors and the radiographic measurements on the survival and the clinical outcome was analysed.

RESULTS

After a follow-up of 4.3 ± 2.6 years (2.1-9.9) 27 UKAs were available. The survival rate was 93.0%. Two UKAs were revised to TKA (excessive valgus alignment and tibial loosening with femoropatellar degeneration). Two further patients had revision surgery (hematoma and lateral meniscus tear). Follow-up clinical and radiological examination was performed in 21 cases: KSS 82.9 ± 10.1 (54.0-100.0), KSS (function) 93.3 ± 9.7 (70.0-100.0); OKS 42.7 ± 6.0 (25.0-48.0); WOMAC 7.9 ± 15.6 (0.0-67.1). No significant influence of demographic factors or radiological measurements on the clinical outcome was present.

CONCLUSION

Prior HTO is not a contraindication for medial UKA, because good-to-excellent results can be achieved in selected patients with medial osteoarthritis and previous HTO, treated with medial UKA, in a midterm follow-up. Excessive mechanical valgus axis should be avoided; therefore, patient selection and accurate evaluation of medial laxity, preoperative mechanical axis, joint line convergence and proximal tibial geometry are important.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Fast Return to Sports and High Level of Activity after Cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Physical activity is essential for overall health. For patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, questions about the implant's suitability for sports arise. The general recommendations for physical activity with knee replacements are often based upon experts' opinions, with a lack of scientific data. This study was performed at an independent high-volume center and aimed to investigate what level of activity patients can achieve and how they perform with a well-functioning cementless unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). Possible differences in outcome in regards to patients' body mass index (BMI) were also examined. A total of 228 knees treated with cementless Oxford UKR (OUKR) were followed up after a mean of 37.1 months. Tegner's and UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) scores were obtained to assess the level of physical activity. The Schulthess Clinical Activity Questionnaire was assessed for detailed information on practiced sports, and the SF-36 questionnaire was evaluated to analyze patients' quality of life. The return to activity rate was 92.9%. In total, 64% of the physically active patients had already taken up sports within 3 months after surgery. Mean Tegner's score was at 3.5, and mean UCLA score was at 6.3. High impact sports were not performed very often after surgery. Higher BMI showed a negative correlation with the numbers of sports (r_sp = -0.289) as well as Tegner's (r_sp = -0.222) and UCLA (r_sp = -0.383) scores. The SF-36 scores were comparably good to those in an age-equivalent standard reference group. In conclusion, cementless OUKR allows a fast return to activity with a high level of physical exercise. Patients with increased BMI tend to practice less types of sports with decreased activity scores.

Prosthetic Alignment and Clinical Outcomes of Navigation-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty by an Experienced Surgeon Compared With Inexperienced Surgeons

BACKGROUND

To improve the accuracy of tibial cut during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), navigation-assisted UKA has been implemented. It has been reported that inexperienced surgeons who use a navigation system achieve better alignment than experienced surgeons who do not use a navigation system. However, there have been no reports comparing the alignments and clinical outcomes of navigation-assisted UKA performed by experienced surgeons in comparison with that by inexperienced surgeons. This study aims to compare these parameters of navigation-assisted UKA performed by experienced and inexperienced surgeons.

METHODS

A total of 209 UKA procedures using an image-free navigation system were included. One experienced surgeon performed 128 UKAs (E group), and six inexperienced surgeons performed 81 UKAs (I group). The target value in the coronal tibial plane was set at 2.0° in varus. Prosthetic alignments and clinical results were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the two groups for prosthetic alignments and clinical outcomes, except for range of motion. The operation time of the I group was statistically longer than that of the E group (P < .001). The ratio of tibial prosthetic fracture was significantly higher in the I group than that in the E group (P = .022).

CONCLUSION

Using a navigation system during UKA, inexperienced surgeons achieved accurate alignments and excellent clinical results similar to an experienced surgeon. However, tibial periprosthetic fractures occurred more often in patients of inexperienced surgeons. Even when using a navigation system, inexperienced surgeons need to demonstrate careful and cautious surgical techniques.

A Case-Control Comparison of Single-Stage Bilateral vs Unilateral Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare postoperative pain, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction among patients receiving one-stage medial bilateral or medial unilateral UKA (unicompartmental knee arthroplasty). Our main hypothesis was that during the first 72 postoperative hours, patients who underwent medial bilateral UKA did not consume more analgesics than those who underwent medial unilateral UKA.

METHODS

A prospective case-control study was undertaken involving 148 patients (74 one-stage medial bilateral vs 74 medial unilateral Oxford UKA). The primary outcome was evaluation of the postoperative total consumption of analgesics from 0 to 72 hours. Next, the postoperative evolution of pain scores and functional recovery were assessed. Oxford Knee Scores were assessed preoperatively at 6 and 12 months with the occurrence of clinical or radiological complications. Finally, patient satisfaction was evaluated at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

The cumulative sums of analgesic consumption (0-72 hours) calculated in the morphine equivalent dose were 21.61 ± 3.70 and 19.11 ± 3.12 mg in the patient and control groups, respectively (P = .30). Moreover, there were no significant differences in terms of pain scores (P = .45), functional recovery (P = .59, .34), length of stay (P = .18), Oxford Knee Scores (P = .68, .60), complications (P = .50), patient satisfaction (P = .66), or recommendations for intervention (P = .64).

CONCLUSION

Patients who undergo one-stage medial bilateral UKA do not experience more pain and do not consume more analgesics than those who undergo medial unilateral UKA. A bilateral procedure is not associated with a lower recovery or a higher rate of complications, as functional outcomes at 6 and 12 months are similar to those of unilateral management.

Mid-Term Evaluation of the Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with BMI of 40 or Greater

Limited evidence is available on mid-term follow-up for patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 receiving a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The primary objective of this study was to investigate survival of the UKA in patients with BMI ≥ 40. Secondary objectives were to assess functional and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Survival analysis with endpoint revision of any component for any reason was conducted using Kaplan-Meier technique on 121 knees (103 patients) that underwent UKA with Oxford Phase 3 implant (Oxford Knee, Biomet, Swindon, United Kingdom) between September 2001 and March 2014 by seven surgeons. Survivorship differences were compared using Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) tests, and Cox Proportional Hazard Model was used to assess predictors of failure. Preoperative PROMs were compared at 2 and 5 years postoperatively using paired t-tests. Mean age of patients was 58 years (43-75), mean BMI 43 kg/m² (40-51), and mean follow-up 7 years (2 months to 15 years). Survival rate for the whole cohort was 92% at 2 years and 86% at 5 years. Females had a significantly higher revision rate than males (p = 0.043). A total of 19 knees required revision (16 to TKA, 2 polyethylene liner exchanges, and 1 femoral component and liner revision). With respect to PROMs, there was a significant improvement at 2 and 5 years (p < 0.001) on 4 of 5 knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score subscales. The mid-term survival rate for the Oxford UKA in patients with morbid obesity is similar to that of other nondesigner patient series with BMI ≥ 30, which provides further evidence for the safety of the implant in this patient population with significant improvements on PROMs at short and mid-term follow-up.

Cementless knee arthroplasty: a review of recent performance

Cementless knee arthroplasty has seen a recent resurgence in popularity due to conceptual advantages, including improved osseointegration providing biological fixation, increased surgical efficiency, and reduced systemic complications associated with cement impaction and wear from cement debris. Increasingly younger and higher demand patients are requiring knee arthroplasty, and as such, there is optimism cementless fixation may improve implant survivorship and functional outcomes.

Compared to cemented implants, the National Joint Registry (NJR) currently reports higher revision rates in cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but lower in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, recent studies are beginning to show excellent outcomes with cementless implants, particularly with UKA which has shown superior performance to cemented varieties. Cementless TKA has yet to show long-term benefit, and currently performs equivalently to cemented in short- to medium-term cohort studies. However, with novel concepts including 3D-printed coatings, robotic-assisted surgery, radiostereometric analysis, and kinematic or functional knee alignment principles, it is hoped they may help improve the outcomes of cementless TKA in the long-term. In addition, though cementless implant costs remain higher due to novel implant coatings, it is speculated cost-effectiveness can be achieved through greater surgical efficiency and potential reduction in revision costs. There is paucity of level one data on long-term outcomes between fixation methods and the cost-effectiveness of modern cementless knee arthroplasty.

This review explores recent literature on cementless knee arthroplasty, with regards to clinical outcomes, implant survivorship, complications, and cost-effectiveness; providing a concise update to assist clinicians on implant choice.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(1):48–57.

Evidence-based surgical technique for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a successful treatment modality in selected patients having advanced, single-compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. The bone and ligament preservation leading to shorter recovery periods, better functional outcomes, lower perioperative complication rates, and easier revision, if needed, are proposed as some of the advantages of UKA over total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite several advantages, UKA is reported to have higher failure rates as compared to TKA. The prosthesis failure of UKA is directly correlated to intraoperative technique-related factors like malpositioning of components and the inability to replicate the target-limb alignment as per preoperative planning. An evidence-based surgical technique for UKA may help surgeons to avoid the intraoperative technique-related errors. The purpose of this paper is to describe a stepwise surgical technique for the fixed-bearing medial UKA.

Bearing dislocation of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in East Asian countries: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Background

Bearing dislocation is a common postoperative complication of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, and East Asian patients tend to be at higher risk. However, whether this high dislocation rate is common in all East Asian populations remains unclear. This meta-analysis was performed to explore this issue and describe various features of dislocation in East Asians, including the onset time, dislocation direction, and re-dislocation rate.

Methods

The literature was searched in PubMed, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane Library up to May 2020. Studies were scrutinized by two independent authors, and the bearing dislocation rate, onset time, direction, and re-dislocation rate were specifically analyzed. RevMan 5.3 was used for the statistical analysis.

Results

Seven case series from Korea, China, and Japan were included. The pooled analysis showed that the total dislocation rate was 2.37%, while the subgroup analysis showed that the dislocation rate in Korea and other countries was 4.50% and 0.74%, respectively (P < 0.01). Another subgroup analysis of the onset time showed a significant difference before and after the first 5 years postoperatively (P < 0.01). Anterior and posterior dislocations were more frequent than medial and lateral dislocations (P < 0.01). The average re-dislocation rate was 32.45%, which was approximately seven times higher than the primary dislocation rate (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that Korea had a higher bearing dislocation rate among East Asian countries, especially in the first 5 years after primary UKA. Anterior and posterior dislocations were common. The most important finding is that the re-dislocation rate can be much higher than the initial dislocation rate.

The effect of obesity on revision rate in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The number of patients with knee osteoarthritis, the proportion that is obese and the number undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are all increasing. The primary aim of this systematic review was to determine the effects of obesity on outcomes in UKA. A systematic review was performed using PRISMA guidelines and the primary outcome was revision rate per 100 observed component years, with a BMI of ≥ 30 used to define obesity. The MINORS criteria and OCEBM criteria were used to assess risk of bias and level of evidence, respectively. 9 studies were included in the analysis. In total there were 4621 knees that underwent UKA. The mean age in included studies was reported to be 63 years (mean range 59.5-72 years old)) and range of follow up was 2-18 years. Four studies were OCEBM level 2b and the average MINORS score was 13. The mean revision rate in obese patients (BMI > 30) was 0.33% pa (95% CI - 3.16 to 2.5) higher than in non-obese patients, however this was not statistically significant (p = 0.82). This meta-analysis concludes that there is no significant difference in outcomes between obese and non-obese patients undergoing UKA. There is currently no evidence that obesity should be considered a definite contraindication to UKA. Further studies are needed to increase the numbers in meta-analysis to explore activity levels, surgeon's operative data, implant design and perioperative complications and revision in more depth.Level of evidence Level III.

Revision Following Cemented and Uncemented Oxford-III Primary Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacements: A 19-Year Analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry

BACKGROUND

Oxford-III unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs) are among the most commonly used prostheses to treat isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA). However, the best mode of implant fixation for primary UKRs remains a source of debate. The hypothesis of this study was that the biologically superior fixation of uncemented Oxford-III primary UKRs would translate into a lower revision rate when compared with cemented Oxford-III primary UKRs used to treat isolated medial compartment OA.

METHODS

Data on all Oxford-III primary UKRs (n = 8,733) completed for isolated medial compartment OA from January 2000 to December 2018 were obtained from the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR). Revision rates were documented for each fixation type and analyzed for associations with patient sex and age at surgery. A multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analysis was completed to determine if type of fixation was an independent risk factor for revision of Oxford-III UKRs.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis revealed a >1.8-fold greater revision risk for cemented Oxford-III UKRs compared with uncemented Oxford-III UKRs (p = 0.001) when considered independently of other risk factors. Furthermore, compared with uncemented fixation, cemented fixation was associated with a 2.9-fold (p < 0.001) increase in revision risk for women <65 years old and a 1.7-fold (p = 0.008) increase in revision risk for men 55 to 74 years old. There was no significant difference in the risk of revision between fixation methods for women ≥65 years old and men ≥75 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the type of fixation was an independent risk factor for revision of Oxford-III UKRs used in the treatment of isolated medial compartment OA. Uncemented Oxford-III primary UKRs had superior implant survivorship in women <65 years old and men 55 to 74 years old. Age and sex are important factors to consider when determining the type of fixation for Oxford-III primary UKRs used to treat isolated medial compartment OA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, an enigma, and the ten enigmas of medial UKA

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a bone- and ligament-sparing alternative to total knee arthroplasty in the patients with end-stage single-compartment degeneration of the knee. Despite being a successful procedure, the multiple advantages of UKA do not correlate with its usage, most likely due to the concerns regarding prosthesis survivability, patient selection, ideal bearing design, and judicious use of advanced technology among many others. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to review and summarize the debated literature and discuss the controversies as “Ten Enigmas of UKA.”

Cementless medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement. Five-year results from an independent series

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is a common treatment option for patients with advanced medial compartment knee arthritis. The Oxford UKR (OUKR) is the most commonly used implant for partial knee replacement. A cementless Oxford prosthesis was introduced in 2004 aiming to reduce the revision rate by potentially reducing radiolucencies as well as errors of cementation associated with the cemented prosthesis. Whilst results from the designer centre have been reported, there is little independent clinical evidence of outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of the cementless OUKR in a single surgeon series at an independent centre and to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes.

METHODS

All patients who received a cementless medial OUKR and had a minimum of five-year follow-up were included in the series. The Oxford knee score was used to evaluate patient outcomes at five years postoperatively. Survival rates, complications and evidence of radiolucencies on plain radiographs were also reviewed.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-eight cementless medial OUKR were implanted in 126 patients. Three patients died and four knees were revised. The five-year survival was 97.4% and the median Oxford knee score was 43 at five years postoperatively. No Complete radiolucent lines were observed on radiographs at one year. Four tibial components subsided.

CONCLUSIONS

This independent series shows that low revision rates and excellent results can be achieved with the use of the cementless OUKR at five years. Early subsidence of the tibial component, which is specific to the cementless prosthesis, warrants further investigation.

Influence of patient selection, component positioning and surgeon's caseload on the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Implant malpositioning, low surgical caseload, and improper patient selection have been identified as essential factors, which could negatively affect the longevity of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The aim of the current study was to evaluate the impact of the surgeon's caseload on patient selection, component positioning, as well as component survivorship and functional outcomes following a PSI-UKA.

METHODS

A total of 125 patient-specific instrumented (PSI) UKA were included. One hundred and two cases were treated by a high-volume surgeon (usage 40%) and 23 cases by a low-volume surgeon (< 10 cases/year, usage 34%). Preoperative UIS, as well as the postoperative clinical and radiologic outcome, were assessed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Irrespective of the surgeon's UKA caseload, PSI allowed good accuracy in component positioning (p > 0.05). The high-volume surgeon had a more strict indication for UKA with 89% showing a UIS > 25 (considered a good indication) compared to 70% for the low-volume surgeon (p = 0.016). The low-volume surgeon achieved worse results regarding functional outcome (p < 0.05) and a tendency toward an increased risk for UKA failure (p = 0.11) compared to the high-volume surgeon.

CONCLUSION

Due to potential selection errors, mostly connected to a low UKA-caseload, low-volume UKA surgeons might achieve worse outcomes. Very strict indications for UKA might be recommended in low-volume surgeons to achieve excellent clinical outcomes following a UKA.

Effect of bone density and cement morphology on biomechanical stability of tibial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) offers good long-term survivorship and superior kinematics and function compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, revision rates are higher with aseptic loosening representing a major cause. Biomechanical stability depends on cement penetration. The goal of this study was to analyze the influence of cement morphology and bone density on primary stability of tibial UKA under physiological loading conditions in human tibiae.

METHODS

Thirty-six tibial trays were implanted in fresh-frozen human cadaver knees and tested for primary stability using dynamic compression-shear testing. Prior to implantation, bone density had been quantified for all 18 tibiae. Postoperatively, cement penetration has been assessed on frontal cuts based on eight predefined parameters. The influence of bone density and cement morphology on biomechanical stability was determined using correlation and linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Mean failure load was 2691 ± 832.9 N, mean total cement thickness was 2.04 ± 0.37 mm, mean cement penetration was 1.54 ± 0.33 mm and mean trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) was 107.1 ± 29.3 mg/ml. There was no significant correlation between failure load and cement morphology (P > .05). Failure load was significantly positive correlated with trabecular BMD (r = 0.843; P < .0001) and cortical BMD (r = 0.432; P = .0136).

CONCLUSIONS

Simulating physiological loading conditions, the failure load of tibial UKA is linearly dependent on the trabecular BMD. The observed parameters of cementation morphology seem capable of preventing failure at the bone-cement interface before inherent bone stability is reached. Further research is required to assess the usefulness of a preoperative assessment of bone quality for patient selection in UKA.

Ten-year clinical and radiographic results of 1000 cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacements

PURPOSE

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) has substantial benefits over total knee replacement (TKR) but has higher revision rates. The cementless Oxford UKR was introduced to address this but there are concerns about fixation and tibial plateau fractures. The first long-term study of the device with clinical and radiographic outcomes is reported.

METHODS

The first 1000 medial cementless Oxford UKR were prospectively identified and followed up by independent physiotherapists. Survival was calculated using the endpoints reoperation, revision, revision to TKR, major revision requiring revision TKR components and patient mortality. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Tegner Activity Score and American Knee Society Score (AKSS) were recorded and radiographs analysed.

RESULTS

The ten year survival was 96.6% (CI 94.8-97.8), 97.5% (CI 95.7-98.5), 98.9% (CI 97.7-99.4) and 99.6% (CI 98.8-99.9) using reoperation, revision, revision to TKR and major revision as the endpoint, respectively. Commonest causes for revision were bearing dislocation (n = 7, 0.7%), disease progression (n = 4, 0.4%) and pain (n = 2, 0.2%). There was one lateral tibial plateau fracture and one femoral component loosening. At 10 years, the mean OKS was 41.2 (SD 9.8), Tegner 2.8 (SD 1.3), AKSS-O 89.1 (SD 13.0) and AKSS-F 80.4 (SD 14.6). There were no pathological radiolucencies or complete radiolucent lines. There were no implant-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The cementless Oxford UKR is a safe procedure with excellent long-term clinical results. Our results suggest that reliable fixation was achieved with only one (0.1%) revision for loosening (femoral), no radiographic evidence of loosening in the remaining cases and no fractures related to implantation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Mid- to long-term function and implant survival of ACL reconstruction and medial Oxford UKR

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe mid- to long-term outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with simultaneous or staged medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR), and compare outcomes between (1) young patients aged younger than 55 at surgery and those older, (2) those with long-term follow-up greater than 10 years, (3) cemented and cementless UKR, and (4) compare outcomes to those with an intact ACL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified knees with staged or simultaneous ACL reconstruction and medial UKR from a prospectively followed designer UKR cohort, and describe mean Oxford Knee Score (OKS), mean Tegner activity score and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. We matched these knees to ACL-intact knees.

RESULTS

Seventy-six consecutive UKR with staged or simultaneous ACL reconstruction were identified with mean six-year follow-up (range 1-15). There was significant improvement in OKS and Tegner score with surgery. At most recent follow-up, OKS was 41.0 (range 11 to 48), and Tegner score 3.6 (0 to 8). There were three revisions occurring at a mean of five years post-operatively. The five-, 10- and 15-year survival estimates were 97% (95% confidence interval [CI] 93-100), 92% (83-100), and 92% (83-100). There was no difference in functional scores or implant survival in young patients, those with long-term follow-up (>10 years), those with cementless fixation, or when compared to ACL intact knees.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate excellent mid- to long-term function and survival of selected patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction and medial UKR. Their outcome was similar to those with intact ACLs.

Short-term survival of cementless Oxford unicondylar knee arthroplasty based on the Finnish Arthroplasty Register

BACKGROUND

Cementless unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) was introduced to secure long-term fixation and reduce the risk of revision. Experience with cementless UKA fixation is limited.

METHODS

The short-term survival (up to five years) of cementless Oxford UKA was assessed using data from the Finish Arthroplasty Register and was compared with that of cemented Oxford 3 UKA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Datawere obtained, from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register, on 1076 cementless Oxford UKAs and 2279 cemented Oxford 3 UKAs performed for primary osteoarthritis in 2005-2015. The Kaplan-Meier method, with revision for any reason as the endpoint, was used to assess the survival of these two UKA groups, and the results were compared with that of 65,563 cemented TKAs treated for primary osteoarthritis over the same period. The risk of revision of both Oxford prostheses was compared using Cox regression model, with adjustment for age and sex, with the cemented TKA group as reference.

RESULTS

The three-year survival was 93.7% for the cementless Oxford, 92.2% for the cemented Oxford 3, and 97.3% for the cemented TKA. The corresponding figures at five years were 92.3%, 88.9%, and 96.6%, respectively. The revision rate for both the cementless Oxford and the cemented Oxford 3 was significantly increased when compared with the cemented TKA (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The survival of the cementless Oxford method was higher than that of the cemented Oxford 3 in the short term. The overall survival of Oxford UKA was poor in comparison with contemporary TKAs.

Medium-term outcome of cementless, mobile-bearing, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Background

Cemented, mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) yields good functional results. However, radiolucent lines (RLL) are not uncommon, even in asymptomatic patients, and it has been debated whether these "physiological" RLLs are indicative of loosening. Cementless UKA may lead to fewer RLLs compared with cemented devices. The present study was designed to document mid-term outcome with an emphasis on clinical outcomes.

Methods

We included 153 knees of 150 consecutive patients in a retrospective study. All patients had received a cementless medial mobile-bearing UKA. Patients were evaluated with use of the Knee Society Score (KSS), which was obtained at baseline and at final follow-up. The WOMAC, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Forgotten Joint Scores (FJS-12) were administered at the final follow-up. Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs were taken at final follow-up.

Results

At a mean follow-up of 5 years (range, 3-7 years), implant survival was 97.1% (95% confidence interval, 91.1-99.1%). Excellent postoperative KSS, WOMAC, OKS and FJS scores were obtained. Postoperative radiography was available for 78 knees. RLL was observed in 10.3% of the cases, but no cases with complete RLLs were seen.

Conclusions

Favourable results were found for cementless, mobile-bearing UKA, with no aseptic loosening at an average follow-up of 5 years. Cementless UKA fixation may lead to a clinically "forgotten joint" and may decrease the rate of RLLs.

Ten-year survival and seven-year functional results of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: A prospective consecutive series of our first 1000 cases

BACKGROUND

Cementless fixation is an alternative to cemented unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR), with several advantages over cementation. This study reports the ten-year survival and seven-year clinical outcome of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (OUKR).

METHODS

This prospective study describes the clinical outcome and survival of the first 1000 consecutive cementless medial OUKRs implanted at two centres for recommended indications.

RESULTS

The 10-year survival was 97% (CI 95%: 92-100%), with 25 knees being revised. The commonest reason for revision was progression of arthritis laterally, which occurred in nine knees, followed by primary dislocation of the bearing, which occurred in six knees. There were two dislocations secondary to trauma and a ruptured ACL, and two tibial plateau fractures. Although there were no definite cases of aseptic loosening, two early revisions were related to tibial fixation: one for pain and a radiolucent line and one for incomplete seating of the component with a radiolucent line. There were four revisions for pain, but the cause of the pain was uncertain: in one there was tibial overhang and in two there was patellofemoral degeneration, which possibly contributed to the pain. There were no deep infections. The mean OKS improved from 23 (SD 8) to 42 (SD 7) at a mean follow-up of 7.0 years (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in survival or clinical outcome between the designer and independent centre.

CONCLUSIONS

The cementless OUKR is a safe and reproducible procedure with excellent 10-year survival and clinical results in the hands of both designer and independent surgeons.

Fewer complications after UKA than TKA in patients over 85 years of age: A case-control study

INTRODUCTION

Implanting a knee prosthesis in patients aged over 85 years is not without risk. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is reputed to show lower morbidity and mortality than total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Elderly patients with isolated unicompartmental osteoarthritis without specific contraindications are thus good candidates for this procedure. The present retrospective case-control study compared complications rates in elderly patients receiving UKA versus TKA. The study hypothesis was that UKA incurs fewer complications, with equivalent functional results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Five hundred and forty-four UKAs were performed between 1987 and 2015; all patients aged 85 years or over (n=30) were included, and age-matched at a rate of 1 UKA for 3 TKAs in our database of 4,216 TKA procedures. Mean age was 87.5 years (range, 85-92 years). The main endpoint was complications rate; secondary endpoints comprised satisfaction, IKS function and knee scores, and implant survival.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 32 months (range, 12-118 months) for UKA and 34 months (range, 12-100 months) for TKA. The medical complications rate was significantly lower with UKA (6.7% versus 25.6%; P=0.02), with no early mortality. IKS scores were identical between UKA and TKA groups at last follow-up: knee, 93.8 (95% CI [89.7-98.0]) versus 89.5 (95% CI [85.6-93.4]), P=0.06; function, 63.8 (95% CI [53.1-74.5]) versus 67.0 (95% CI [61.3-72.7]), P=0.62. Satisfaction rates were likewise identical: 96% and 97%, respectively (P=0.77); and implant survivorship was identical (P=0.54).

DISCUSSION

Early medical complications were fewer after UKA than TKA in a population aged ≥85 years, with comparable clinical outcome. These results argue in favor of UKA in elderly patients with comorbidities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, case-control study.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current indications, technical issues and results

An age younger than 60 years, a body weight of 180 lb (82 kg) or more, performing heavy work, having chondrocalcinosis and having exposed bone in the patellofemoral (PF) joint are not contraindications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).Severe wear of the lateral facet of the PF joint with bone loss and grooving is a contraindication for UKA.Medial UKA should only be performed in cases of severe osteoarthritis (OA) as shown in pre-operative X-rays, with medial bone-on-bone contact and a medial/lateral ratio of < 20%.The post-operative results of UKA are generally good. Medium-term and long-term studies have reported acceptable results at 10 years, with implant survival greater than 95% for UKAs performed for medial OA or osteonecrosis and for lateral UKA, especially when fixed-bearing implants are used.When all implant-related re-operations are considered, the 10-year survival rate is 94%, and the 15-year survival rate is 91%.Aseptic loosening is the principal failure mechanism in the first few years in mobile-bearing implants, whereas OA progression causes most failures in later years in fixed-bearing implants.The overall complication rate and the comprehensive re-operation rate are comparable in both mobile bearings and fixed bearings.The survival likelihood of the all-polyethylene UKA implant is similar to that of metal-backed modular designs for UKA.Notable cost savings of approximately 50% can be achieved with an outpatient UKA surgery protocol. Outpatient surgery for UKA is efficacious and safe, with satisfactory clinical results thus far. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:363-373. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170048.

The Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: The South African Experience

BACKGROUND

The Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA) is a successful treatment for endstage, symptomatic anteromedial osteoarthritis. This study reports the results of a cohort of consecutive cemented and cementless medial OUKAs from an independent center and aims to answer the following questions: what is the survival of OUKA in the hands of a nondesigner surgeon? Are there any differences in the survival of cementless and cemented OUKA? Are the failure modes any different with the cementless and cemented OUKA?

METHODS

One thousand one hundred twenty consecutive OUKAs were implanted in a single center for the recommended indications. Patients were prospectively identified and followed up. Survival was calculated with revision as the end point.

RESULTS

There were 522 cemented and 598 cementless implants. The mean follow-up was 8.3 years for cemented implants (range 0.5-17, standard deviation [SD] 2.9) and 2.7 years (range 0.5-7, SD 1.8) for cementless implants. The Oxford knee score improved from a preoperative mean of 22 (SD 8.1) to 40 (SD 7.9) at the last follow-up (P < .001). There were 59 failures requiring revision surgery, with a 5.3% cumulative revision rate. The most common reason for failure was progression of osteoarthritis in the lateral compartment, occurred in 26 cases (2.3%). The cumulative 10-year survival was 91% (95% confidence interval 87.3-95.2).

CONCLUSION

The results of this prospective, consecutive case series from the African continent demonstrated that excellent results are achievable with the OUKA in independent centers if the correct indications and surgical technique are used.

Long-term outcomes of over 8,000 medial Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knees-a systematic review

Background and purpose - There is debate as to the relative merits of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty (UKA, TKA). Although the designer surgeons have achieved good results with the Oxford UKA there is concern over the reproducibility of these outcomes. Therefore, we evaluated published long-term outcomes of the Oxford Phase 3 UKA. Patients and methods - We searched databases to identify studies reporting ≥10 year outcomes of the medial Oxford Phase 3 UKA. Revision, non-revision, and re-operation rates were calculated per 100 component years (% pa). Results - 15 studies with 8,658 knees were included. The annual revision rate was 0.74% pa (95% CI 0.67-0.81, n = 8,406) corresponding to a 10-year survival of 93% and 15-year survival of 89%. The non-revision re-operation rate was 0.19% pa (95% CI 0.13-0.25, n = 3,482). The re-operation rate was 0.89% pa (95% CI 0.77-1.02, n = 3,482). The most common causes of revision were lateral disease progression (1.42%), aseptic loosening (1.25%), bearing dislocation (0.58%), and pain (0.57%) (n = 8,658). Average OKS scores were 40 at 10 years (n = 3,417). The incidence of medical complications was 0.83% (n = 1,443). Interpretation - Very good outcomes were achieved by both designer and non-designer surgeons. The PROMs, medical complication rate, and non-revision re-operation rate were better than those found in meta-analyses and publications for TKA but the revision rate was higher. However, if failure is considered to be all re-operations and not just revisions, then the failure rate of UKA was less than that of TKA.

Unicompartmental knee replacement - Current perspectives

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an effective treatment for end-stage, symptomatic unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. However, certain aspects of the procedure are still debated. These areas of discussion include patient selection criteria, implant design and the discrepancy in survival rates between national registries and independent case series. These may contribute in limiting the more widespread acceptance of unicompartmental knee replacement. The aim of this paper is to review the up-to-date evidence on UKR and discuss the most relevant controversies regarding this procedure.

Cementless Oxford medial unicompartimental knee replacement: an independent series with a 5-year-follow-up

PURPOSE

Cemented unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) has proven excellent long-term survival rates and functional scores in Price et al. (Clin Orthop Relat Res 435:171-180, 2005), Price and Svard (Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(1):174-179, 2011) and Murray et al. (Bone Joint Surg Br 80(6):983-989, 1998). The main causes for revision, aseptic loosening and pain of unknown origin might be addressed by cementless UKR in Liddle et al. (Bone Joint J 95-B(2):181-187, 2013), Pandit et al. (J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(15):1365-1372, 2013), National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland: 10th Annual Report 2013 ( http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Portals/0/Documents/England/Reports/10th_annual_report/NJR%2010th%20Annual%20Report%202013%20B.pdf , 2013), Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: Annual Report 2013 ( http://www.myknee.se/pdf/SKAR2013_Eng.pdf , 2013).

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective cohort study reports the 5-year follow-up results of our first 30 consecutively implanted cementless Oxford UKR (OUKR). Clinical outcome was measured using the OKS, AKSS, range of movement and level of pain (visual analogue scale). The results were compared to cemented OUKR in a matched-pair analysis.

RESULTS

Implant survival was 89.7%. One revision each was performed due to tibial fracture, progression of osteoarthritis (OA) and inlay dislocation. The 5-year survival rate of the cementless group was 89.7% and of the cemented group 94.1%. Both groups showed excellent postoperative clinical scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Cementless fixation shows good survival rates and clinical outcome compared to cemented fixation.

Joint Preservation Surgery for Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis

Single compartment osteoarthritis is a commonly encountered condition in the middle-aged population, with the medial compartment being the most commonly involved compartment. Medial compartment osteoarthritis becomes seriously disabling for these active patients, with a very few definitive solutions. These patients quickly stop responding to the conservative methods such as lifestyle modification, drugs, physiotherapy, and rehab programs. Less invasive procedures such as intra-articular injections or joint debridement also do not give a long-lasting relief. On the other hand, this population is too young to undergo a knee replacement surgery because the failure rate of a knee replacement surgery is too high in the middle-aged patients as compared with the elderly population. A combination of biological stimulation of the damaged single compartment cartilage and biomechanical correction surgery can give a long-lasting relief in the middle-aged population. Because the medial compartment osteoarthritis is increasingly being treated with joint preservation surgeries, it is important to lay out the step-by-step surgical technique of a joint preservation surgery. This Technical Note presents the detailed technique, patient selection flow chart, tips, pearls, and surgical decision making, along with a surgical video of a joint preservation surgery.