Abnormal tibial alignment is a risk factor for lateral meniscus posterior root tears in patients with anterior cruciate ligament ruptures

Impact of lower limb alignment abnormality (physiologic knee valgus) on the functional recovery outcome of athletes with meniscal injuries

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the impact of lower limb alignment abnormalities, specifically physiological knee valgus, on the functional recovery outcomes of athletes with meniscal injuries. It also examined the factors influencing these abnormalities to provide scientific evidence for treatment and rehabilitation of related sports injuries.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 118 athletes from Guizhou Normal University, who were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of lower limb alignment abnormalities. The Simple group comprised athletes with isolated meniscal injuries, while the Combined group included athletes with meniscal injuries and concurrent lower limb alignment abnormalities. We assessed the functional status of both groups and analyzed factors influencing lower limb alignment abnormalities.

RESULTS

Of the 118 athletes, 46 (38.98%) exhibited lower limb alignment abnormalities, and 72 (61.02%) did not. No significant differences in general characteristics were found between the groups (all P > 0.05). The Combined group displayed higher Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and Functional Performance Test (FPT) results (coordinated contraction, shuttle run, CarioCa) compared to the Simple group (P < 0.05). Conversely, joint range of motion (ROM), knee muscle strength (flexors), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were lower in the Combined group (all P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified active ROM < 105.32°, passive ROM < 101.66°, and knee muscle strength (flexors) < 84.41 N as risk factors for lower limb alignment abnormalities (P < 0.05), while FPT acted as a protective factor (P < 0.05). The combined testing model demonstrated higher predictive efficacy (AUC = 0.903, 95% CI: 0.852-0.955, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Lower limb alignment abnormalities significantly affect the functional recovery outcomes of athletes with meniscal injuries. Factors such as ROM, knee muscle strength, and IKDC score may pose risks for these abnormalities, whereas FPT can provide protective benefits. Timely detection and correction of lower limb alignment abnormalities during the rehabilitation process from meniscal injuries are crucial to enhance recovery and improve prognosis.

Male sex, revision surgery, low volume of anterior cruciate ligament remnant, and significant instability are risk factors for Posterior Root Tear of the Lateral Meniscus in patients undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

This multicenter study aimed to determine the incidence of lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction and identify associated risk factors.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study using data from the Francophone Arthroscopic Society's registry. The study included all the patients in the registry who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery between June 2020 and June 2023, we excluded incomplete data. We compared delay from injury to surgery between LMPRTs group and No LMPRTs group. Variables investigated as potential risk factors for LMPRTs included age, sex, nature of surgery (primary or revision), pivot shift test result, side-to-side laxity under anesthesia, presence of ACL remnant, occurrence of medial meniscal tear, and presence of collateral ligament injury. Risk factors were analyzed using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Among the 5359 patients analyzed, LMPRTs occurred in 7.0% (n=375) of cases during ACL reconstruction. Mean age at surgery was 29.3 +/- 10.3 years old [11-77]. Concerning delay to surgery, the mean time was 8.4 +/- 23.1 weeks [0.0-347.2] in the No LMPRTs group and 6.5 +/- 10.2 weeks [0.2-61.6] in the LMPRTs group (p = 0.109). Univariate analysis revealed that male sex (p < 0.001), revision surgery (p < 0.001), medial meniscal injury (p = 0.007), ACL remnant (0% vs > 70%, <10% vs > 70%, 10 to 30% vs > 70%, 30 to 50% vs > 70%, 50 to 70% vs > 70%; p < 0.001) and higher pivot shift grade (p = 0.011) were significantly associated with a presence of LMPRTs. Age, side-to-side laxity, and collateral ligament injury were not found to be significant risk factor In multivariate analysis : male sex, revision surgery, pivot shift test result and a low volume of ACL remnant remained significant. Side to side laxity was also a significant factor in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

This study identified male sex, revision surgery, low volume of ACL remnant, side to side laxity and higher grade of pivot shift as significant risk factors for LMPRTs during ACL reconstruction.

Steep Posterior Tibial Slope and Excessive Anterior Tibial Translation Are Associated With Increased Sagittal Meniscal Extrusion After Posterior Lateral Meniscus Root Repair Combined With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Purpose

To (1) evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with type II posterior lateral meniscus root tear (PLMRT) repair and (2) identify whether increased anterior tibial subluxation of the lateral compartment (ATSLC) and steeper posterior tibial slope (PTS) are associated with sagittal lateral meniscal extrusion (LME).

Methods

Patients who underwent primary anatomic ACLR with concomitant type II PLMRTs using the all-inside side-to-side repair technique between November 2014 and September 2020 were identified. To be included, patients must have had a minimum of 2 years follow-up. All patients, including those with ATSLC and PTS and sagittal and coronal LME, were retrospectively reviewed clinically and radiologically. The patients were divided into 2 subgroups according to the occurrence of sagittal LME.

Results

Forty patients were included in this study with a mean follow-up of 44 months (range, 24-94 months). In general, the postoperative parameters, including grade of pivot shift, side-to-side difference, ATSLC, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, were significantly improved compared with the preoperative ones. However, postoperative sagittal LME was detected to be significantly larger than the preoperative one. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) analysis for postoperative outcomes showed that the rate of patients who achieved MCID thresholds was 100% for Lysholm, 95% for IKDC, 42.50% for coronal LME, 62.50% for sagittal LME, 40% for ATSLC, and 100% for side-to-side difference. Further comparisons, where patients were divided into 2 subgroups according to the occurrence of sagittal LME, showed significant differences in PTS, ATSLC, and coronal LME.

Conclusions

Clinical outcomes after type II PLMRT repair with primary ACLR were significantly improved, except for LME, at the 2-year postoperative follow-up. After repair of type II PLMRT injuries, the presence of sagittal LME was associated with increased PTS and ATSLC.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Increased Posterior Tibial Slope Is Associated With Increased Risk of Meniscal Root Tears: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

While increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) is an established risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament tears, the association between tibial slope and meniscal posterior root tears is not well-defined.

PURPOSE

To summarize the available literature evaluating the association between PTS and meniscus root injuries compared with patients without root tears.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using the Scopus, PubMed, and Embase databases. Human clinical studies evaluating the associations between the medial tibial slope (MTS), lateral tibial slope (LTS), lateral-to-medial (L-to-M) slope asymmetry, and the risk of meniscus root tears were included. Patients with medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) and lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) were compared with a control group without root injury. Study quality was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies criteria.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 1313 patients were included (884 patients with root tears; 429 controls). The LMPRT subgroup (n = 284) had a significantly greater LTS (mean ± SD, 7.3°± 1.5° vs 5.7°± 3.91°; P < .001), MTS (5.26°± 1.2° vs 4.8°± 1.25°; P < .001), and increased L-to-M asymmetry (2.3°± 1.3° vs 0.65°± 0.5°; P < .001) compared with controls. The MMPRT group (n = 600) had significantly increased MTS relative to controls (8.1°± 2.5° vs 4.3°± 0.7°; P < .001). Furthermore, there was a higher incidence of noncontact injuries (79.3%) and concomitant ramp lesions (56%) reported in patients with LMPRT.

CONCLUSION

Increased MTS, LTS, and L-to-M slope asymmetry are associated with an increased risk of LMPRTs, while increased MTS is associated with MMPRTs. Surgeons should consider how proximal tibial anatomy increases the risk of meniscus root injury.

Comparison of Size of Posterior Tibial Slope and Medial Tibial Depth in Patients With an Isolated Meniscal Tear Requiring Surgery and Matched Uninjured Controls

BACKGROUND

Meniscal injuries are extremely common. Several anatomic features of the knee, including the tibial plateau morphology, have been shown to influence knee biomechanics and the risk of ligamentous injuries. Little is known, however, how these morphological features influence the risk of isolated meniscal injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-intact knee.

HYPOTHESIS

There are differences in the slopes and concavity of the tibial plateau between patients with isolated meniscal tears and matched uninjured controls.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

In total, 89 patients with first-instance isolated medial (n = 37) or lateral (n = 52) meniscal injuries requiring surgical treatment (mean age, 16 ± 1 years; 35% female) were matched to 89 controls with uninjured knees and no previous injuries (mean age, 16 ± 2 years; 35% female) based on age and sex. Magnetic resonance imaging scans (preoperative for injured group) were used to measure the coronal slope of the tibial plateau, posterior slope of the medial and lateral tibial plateaus, and maximum depth of the medial tibial plateau. General linear models were used to evaluate the differences in tibial plateau morphology between the knees with and without meniscal injuries, with and without adjustment for age and sex.

RESULTS

Compared with matched controls, patients with surgically treated isolated meniscal tears had a smaller lateral tibial slope (by 2.2° [medial meniscal injury] and 1.6° [lateral meniscal injury]; P < .02), a smaller medial tibial slope (by 2.3° [medial meniscal injury] and 2.4° [lateral meniscal injury]; P < .001) and a larger medial tibial depth (by 0.8 mm [medial meniscal injury] and 0.9 mm [lateral meniscal injury]; P < .001). There were no differences in coronal tibial slope between the injured and uninjured groups. There were no differences in quantified anatomic features between the isolated medial and lateral meniscal injury groups. The same trends were observed after adjusting for age and sex.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that patients with an isolated meniscal tear requiring surgery have a smaller posterior tibial slope and a larger medial tibial depth (more concave medial tibial plateau) than matched uninjured controls. This is contrary to what is known for ACL tears, in which a steeper posterior tibial slope and a shallower medial tibial depth have been associated with an increased risk of ACL tear.

Lateral-medial asymmetry of posterior tibial slope and small lateral tibial plateau articular surface depth are morphological factors of lateral meniscus posterior root tears in ACL-injured patients

PURPOSE

To investigate whether knee morphological features, patient characteristics, and intraoperative findings are associated with a lateral meniscus (LM) posterior root tear (LMPRT) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries with the integrated data from two academic centres.

METHODS

This retrospective study used registry data acquired prospectively at two academic centres. Patients with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with LMPRT and no other LM injury were selected (LMPRT group) from each database. The control group included patients who underwent ACLR without LM tears. Patients were matched to the LMPRT group according to age and gender (1:1). Morphological factors evaluated on preoperative magnetic resonance image scans included lateral femoral condyle (LFC) anterior-posterior diameter, height, and depth; lateral tibial plateau (LTP) articular surface (AS) depth and sagittal plane depth; and lateral and medial posterior tibial slopes (PTSs). LFC height and depth ratios, LTP AS depth and sagittal plane depth ratios, and lateral-to-medial slope asymmetry were computed from previous measurements. Patient characteristics and intraoperative findings were extracted and compared between both groups.

RESULTS

The study included 252 patients (126 in each group). The lateral-medial asymmetry of PTS was greater in the LMPRT group (1.2° vs 0.3°, p < 0.05), and the LTP AS depth was smaller in the LMPRT group (31.4 mm vs 33.2 mm, p < 0.01). There were no differences in LFC morphology between the control and LMPRT groups. Pivot shift grade (p < 0.05), percentage of complete ACL tears (p < 0.05), and medial meniscus ramp lesions (p < 0.05) were significantly higher in the LMPRT group.

CONCLUSION

LMPRT was associated with significantly increased lateral-medial asymmetry of PTS and significantly smaller LTP AS depth. LMPRT was also associated with an increase in the preoperative pivot shift grade and the presence of a medial meniscus ramp lesion. These morphological characteristics are rather simple to measure and would serve as helpful indicators to preoperatively detect LMPRT, which is frequently challenging to diagnose preoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Risk Factors for Concomitant Meniscal Injury With Sport-Related Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Background

Previous studies of concomitant meniscal injury in athletes with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury have examined age, sex, body mass index (BMI), injury mechanism, and time from injury to surgery as potential risk factors.

Purpose

To identify additional risk factors for concomitant meniscal injury, including preinjury joint laxity and lower extremity alignment, in athletes with sport-related ACL injury.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

This study included 180 participants aged 13 to 26 years who underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) after a first-time ACL injury sustained during participation in sport. Contralateral lower extremity alignment and joint laxity were used as surrogate measures for the injured knee before trauma. Concomitant meniscal tear patterns were identified at the time of ACLR. Sex-specific analyses were conducted.

Results

Concomitant meniscal injury was observed in 60.6% of the subjects. The prevalence of concomitant injury was higher in male than female participants (69.9% vs 54.2%; P = .035) due to a higher prevalence of lateral meniscal injuries (56.2% vs 38.3%; P = .018). Among male patients, there was a significant difference in the prevalence of concomitant lateral meniscal tear according to sport participation (≥9 vs <9 h/week: 67.4% vs 35.7%; P = .032). Among male patients, the likelihood of concomitant injury to both the lateral and medial menisci increased by 28.8% for each 1-mm decrease in navicular drop. Among female patients, the likelihood of concomitant injury to the lateral meniscus increased by 15% per degree increase in genu recurvatum and 14% per degree decrease in standing quadriceps angle, with similar effects on the likelihood of concurrent injury to both the lateral and medial menisci.

Conclusion

Measures of lower extremity alignment and genu recurvatum previously identified as risk factors for ACL injury were also associated with concomitant meniscal injury in female patients while other risk factors, including BMI and joint laxity, were not. Increased time spent participating in sport and navicular drop were associated with concomitant meniscal injury in male patients.

Age, male sex, higher posterior tibial slope, deep sulcus sign, bone bruises on the lateral femoral condyle, and concomitant medial meniscal tears are risk factors for lateral meniscal posterior root tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) are commonly found in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. However, risk factors for LMPRTs are not well known. This study was designed to systematically review the available evidence regarding risk factors associated with LMPRTs.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for papers containing the key words "lateral meniscus posterior root tears", "LMPRTs" and "risk factor". Inclusion screening, data extraction, and quality assessment of the included articles were conducted independently by two authors. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine risk factors for LMPRTs.

RESULT

Seventeen studies with a total sample size of 6, 589 patients were identified. The pooled prevalence of LMPRTs was 9.6% (range, 5.1-33.8%) for ACL injury. Significant risk factors included a patient age of < 30 [OR = 1.4, 95% CI (1.07, 1.84), p = 0.01], male sex [OR = 1.50, 95% CI (1.24,1.81), p = 0.01], higher body mass index (BMI) [MD = 0.45, 95% CI (0.13, 0.76), p < 0.01], higher lateral posterior tibial slope (LPTS) [MD = 2.22, 95% CI (1.37, 3.07), p < 0.01], deep sulcus sign [OR = 5.76, 95% CI (1.35, 24.52), p < 0.01] and bone bruises on lateral femoral condyle [OR = 4.88, 95% CI (1.27, 18.77), p < 0.01], lateral meniscal extrusion > 1 mm [OR = 5.56, 95% CI (1.52, 20.29), p < 0.01] and > 3 mm [OR = 12.91 95% CI (1.28, 130.01), p < 0.01], medial meniscal tears [OR = 1.40, 95% CI (1.12, 1.75), p < 0.01], and medial ramp lesions [OR = 2.29, 95% CI (1.35, 3.89), p < 0.01].

CONCLUSION

Age below 30, male, higher BMI, higher LPTS, deep sulcus sign, bone bruises on lateral femoral condyle, lateral meniscal extrusion, medial meniscal tear, and medial ramp lesion are risk factors for LMPRTs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Increased Posterior Tibial Slope and Meniscal Slope Could Be Risk Factors for Meniscal Injuries: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the available evidence and examine the relation between the posterior tibial slope (PTS) and meniscal slope (MS) and the incidence of meniscal injury.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched from inception to February 23, 2021. Cohort studies investigating the association between PTS or MS and the risk of meniscal injury were included. Two authors independently conducted the literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies with a total of 2,670 patients were included. For meniscal injury with an anterior cruciate ligament tear, the lateral PTS in the lateral meniscal root tear group (range, 8.0°-12.6°) was significantly higher than that in the control group (range, 4.0°-10.7°). Furthermore, there appeared to be a relation between a greater medial MS and the presence of a ramp lesion (range, 2.6°-6.7° for ramp lesion vs 2.0°-5.1° for control). For degenerative meniscal injury, the medial PTS in the medial meniscal posterior root tear group (range, 6.15°-10.4°) was significantly greater than that in the control group (range, 4.0°-9.8°).

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the available evidence, for meniscal injury with an anterior cruciate ligament tear, an increased lateral PTS was associated with a higher risk of lateral meniscal tears and lateral meniscal posterior root tears. Furthermore, there appeared to be a relation between an increased medial MS and a higher risk of ramp lesions. For degenerative meniscal injury, most of the included studies showed that a larger medial PTS could increase the risk of medial meniscal tears and medial meniscal posterior root tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review of Level III studies.

Outcomes of Combined Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root Repair and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

Lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) almost always occur in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Their repair is advocated to restore the stabilizing and load-sharing functions of the meniscus.

Purpose:

To study the functional outcomes of combined arthroscopic repair of LMPRTs and ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

The authors evaluated patients who underwent simultaneous arthroscopic ACLR and LMPRT repair. All patients had chronic injuries, with a mean time since ACL rupture of 7.9 months. Patient characteristics, Lachman and pivot-shift test results, type of LMPRT, associated injuries, and surgery details were documented. Pre- and postoperative functional status was assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Lysholm score. An independent single-tunnel transtibial repair using 2 SutureTapes was performed for Forkel type 1 and 3 tear root avulsions, while side-to-side suture repair was performed for type 2 radial/oblique tears. The Wilcoxon signed rank test and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the IKDC score were used for statistical analysis.

Results:

Included were 25 patients with a mean age of 29.6 ± 6.5 years. Of these, 22 patients (88%; 95% CI, 73.1%-100%) had a high-grade (grade 2 or 3) preoperative pivot shift. Diagnosis of the LMPRT on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans was possible only in 5 patients (20%). At final evaluation, performed at 37.4 ± 7.1 months postoperatively, all functional scores had improved significantly from preoperatively: IKDC score, from 47.6 ± 9.5 to 81.8 ± 11.5; KOOS, from 45.5 ± 10.9 to 86.5 ± 10.3, and Lysholm score, from 49.0 ± 11.5 to 88.8 ± 7.6 (P < .001 for all). Twenty-four patients (96%) achieved the MCID for the IKDC score. All knees had a negative pivot shift at final analysis, and no patient underwent revision ACLR or LMPRT repair.

Conclusion:

LMPRT repair combined with ACLR led to good short-term clinical outcomes in this study. An LMPRT may frequently go undetected on preoperative MRI scans, but a high-grade pivot shift is present in a large majority of these patients.

Steep posterior lateral tibial slope, bone contusion on lateral compartments and combined medial collateral ligament injury are associated with the increased risk of lateral meniscal tear

PURPOSE

To determine the risk factors for lateral meniscus and root tears in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries.

METHODS

A total of 226 patients undergoing acute ACL reconstruction were included in the study sample. Exclusion criteria were revisions, fractures, chronic cases, and multiple ligament injuries, with the exception of medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries. The patients were divided into groups based on the presence of lateral meniscus and root tears by arthroscopy. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), injury mechanism (contact/non-contact), Segond fracture, side-to-side laxity, location of bone contusion, medial and lateral tibial and meniscal slope, mechanical axis angle, and grade of pivot shift.

RESULTS

Overall lateral meniscus (LM) tears were identified in 97 patients (42.9%), and LM root tears were found in 22 patients (9.7%). The risk of an LM tear in ACL-injured knees increased with bone contusion on LTP (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.419-8.634; P = 0.007), steeper lateral tibial slope (OR, 1.133; 95% CI 1.003-1.28; P = 0.045), MCL injury (OR, 2.618; 95% CI 1.444-4.746; P = 0.002), and non-contact injury mechanism (OR, 3.132; 95% CI 1.446-6.785; P = 0.004) in logistic regression analysis. The risk of LM root tear in ACL-injured knees increased with high-grade pivot shift (OR, 9.127; 95% CI 2.821-29.525; P = 0.000) and steeper lateral tibial slope (OR, 1.293; 95% CI 1.061-1.576; P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

The increased risk of LM lesions in acute ACL-injured knees should be considered if significant risk factors including bone contusion on lateral compartments, MCL injury, and a steeper lateral tibial slope are present. Moreover, high-grade rotational injury with steeper lateral tibial slope are also significant risk factors for LM root tears, and therefore care should be taken by clinicians not to miss such lesions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Increased Posterior Slope of the Medial and Lateral Meniscus Posterior Horn Is Associated With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

PURPOSE

To measure the slope of the medial and lateral posterior horn of the meniscus and its contribution to the overall resulting posterior tibial slope (bone and meniscus combined slope) in anterior cruciate ligament-intact (ACLI) and -deficient (ACLD) knees.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance images of intact menisci in patients 16 to 60 years old were included. Posterior tibial bone slope (PTS) and meniscus slope (MS) were measured 25%, 50%, and 75% from the medial and lateral borders of the tibial plateau. Analysis of variance was used to determine differences in posterior tibial slopes between ACLD and ACLI knees and between sexes for ACLD and ACLI knees.

RESULTS

192 ACLI patients (age 35.2 ± 9.6 years, mean ± standard deviation) and 159 ACLD patients (age 34.2 ± 10.3 years) were included. Medial and lateral PTS in ACLD was significantly (P = .00001) higher at 25%, 50%, and 75%. Medial and lateral MS in ACLD was significantly (P = .00001) lower at 25%, 50%, and 75%. There were no significant sex differences for medial or lateral MS in ACLD or ACLI patients (P = .51). The resultant combined medial and lateral slope in ACLD patients was significantly (P = .00001) lower at 25%, 50%, and 75%. There were no significant sex differences in PTS (P = .68), MS (P = .51), or resultant slope (P = .79) CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study strongly suggest that lower meniscal slopes of both the medial and lateral posterior horns are associated with ACL injuries in both males and females. Although the posterior horns reversed the bone PTS to an anterior inclined slope in both ACLD and ACLI patients, both the meniscus slope and the combined resultant slope were significantly lower and more positive at all 6 measured locations in ACLD knees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Increased posterior tibial slope results in increased incidence of posterior lateral meniscal root tears in ACL reconstruction patients

PURPOSE

While the association with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears has been established, other risk factors and associated pathologies which occur with a concomitant lateral meniscal posterior root tear (LMPRT) are not well defined. The purpose of this study was to compare the risk factors and concomitant pathologies between patients with LMPRT and patients without LMPRTs in the setting of a primary ACL tear.

METHODS

Patients with a LMPRT identified at the time of primary ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon were identified. These patients were matched by age and sex to patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction who were not found to have lateral meniscus root tears (control group) in a 1:1 ratio. Lateral posterior tibial slope (PTS), medial PTS, lateral femoral condyle height and depth, lateral tibial plateau depth, and lateral tibial plateau subluxation were measured on MRI. Anteroposterior full-limb alignment radiographs were used to measure the medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and the mechanical weightbearing axis for the injured extremity.

RESULTS

One-hundred three patients were included in both the LMPRT group and the matched control group. Patients with a LMPRT had a significantly steeper lateral PTS (9.1° vs. 7.0°, p = 0.001), a steeper medial PTS (7.0° vs. 6.0°, p = 0.03), and a greater lateral-to-medial slope asymmetry (2.0° vs. 1.0°, p = 0.001). There were no differences in lateral femoral condyle depth or height, lateral tibial plateau depth, lateral tibial plateau subluxation, MPTA, mLDFA, or mechanical weightbearing axis between groups. There was a significantly increased incidence of medial meniscus ramp lesions in patients with lateral meniscus posterior root tears compared with controls (34.0% vs. 15.5%, odds ratio: 2.8, p = 0.002). There were no associations with concomitant ligament injuries, medial meniscus root tears, or non-ramp tears based on case/control grouping.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, LMPRTs in the setting of primary ACL injuries were associated with significantly increased lateral and medial PTSs, and increased asymmetry between lateral and medial PTSs. In addition, clinicians should be aware of the increased incidence of concurrent medial meniscal ramp lesions in patients with LMPRTs. Knowledge of these associations helps guide clinical decision-making and counselling of patients in the setting of ACL tears with concomitant LMPRTs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root Injury: MRI Findings in Children With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear

BACKGROUND. Undiagnosed and unrepaired root tears are increasingly recognized as a preventable cause of accelerated osteoarthritis. Preoperative MRI findings of lateral meniscus posterior root tears in children with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are not well described. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of preoperative MRI for identifying concomitant lateral meniscus posterior root injuries in pediatric patients with ACL tears with arthroscopy as the reference standard. METHODS. Consecutively registered children who underwent MRI within 90 days before arthroscopic primary ACL reconstruction between March 2017 and December 2019 were included. Two radiologists assessed MRI examinations for direct signs involving the root proper and for findings associated with lateral meniscus posterior root tears. Kappa coefficients for MRI findings were computed. Findings in patients with root tears and intact roots were compared by independent-samples t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS. At arthroscopy, 39 children (18 boys, 21 girls; mean age, 15.2 ± 1.4 years) had lateral meniscus posterior root tears; 51 (22 boys, 29 girls; mean age, 15.7 ± 1.8 years) had intact roots. Kappa coefficients ranged from 0.65 to 0.92, aside from tears involving the entheseal segment (κ = 0.55) or popliteomeniscal fascicles (κ = 0.45). MRI findings that were predictors of arthroscopically diagnosed root tear (p < .05) were lateral meniscus root tear in any segment (odds ratio [OR], 16.8; 95% CI, 5.6-50.1), degeneration in any segment (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.6-9.6), coronal cleft sign (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.0-16.7), sagittal ghost sign (OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.2-19.1), and axial radial defect sign (OR, 7.1; 95% CI, 2.4-20.5). Tear involving any segment of the root proper had the highest PPV, 82%, with 79% NPV. The coronal cleft, sagittal ghost, and axial radial defect signs had specificities of 88%, 94%, and 88% but sensitivities of 44%, 23%, and 49%. The only significant independent predictor on preoperative MRI was root tear in any segment (OR, 15.8; 95% CI, 2.7-137.5; p = .003). CONCLUSION. Among MRI findings evaluated for preoperative diagnosis of lateral meniscus posterior root tear, tear involving any segment of the root proper had the strongest performance; associated findings had high specificity but low sensitivity. CLINICAL IMPACT. Accurate identification of lateral meniscus posterior root tears on preoperative MRI can aid in operative planning and reduce treatment delay.

Arthroscopic incidence of lateral meniscal root avulsion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury

Background

To arthroscopically evaluate the incidence of lateral meniscal root avulsion (LMRA) and associated intra-articular injuries in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Materials and Methods

From April 2014 to March 2017, 532 consecutive patients were diagnosed as having an ACL injury and underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. The diagnosis of LMRA was made arthroscopically. The effects of gender, activity, grade of laxity, time from injury, and concomitant meniscal lesions were analyzed.

Results

Among 532 patients, 497 (93.4%) underwent primary ACL reconstruction and 35 (6.5%) underwent revision procedures. 383 were acute or subacute injuries (less than 6 months from injury to surgery) and 149 chronic (more than 6 months). Average age was 30.4 years (DS: ± 11.04); there were 422 (79.3%) males and 110 (20.6%) females. A LMRA associated with the ACL injury was detected in 72 cases (13.5%), with a significant prevalence observed in males (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\chi ^2}$$\end{document}χ2 = 4.65; P = 0.031, statistically significant). In the 149 patients with a chronic injury, 27 patients had LMRA (18.1%), while 45 of the 383 patients with an acute or subacute injury had LMRA (11.7%). There was a tendency, albeit not significant (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\chi ^2}$$\end{document}χ2 = 3.721; P = 0.054), for the prevalence to increase with time since the initial ACL injury. LMRA was significantly associated (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\chi ^2}$$\end{document}χ2 = 7.81; P = 0.006) with a meniscocapsular tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus (ramp lesion). No other significant associations, such as with severity of A-P translation (as measured by KT-2000) or activity level, were detected.

Conclusion

LMRA is a relatively common injury associated with both acute and chronic ACL tears. A relatively high incidence in cases of chronic ACL insufficiency suggests that LMRAs do not heal spontaneously or that they may appear with time, even when absent at the time of the initial injury.

Level of evidence

Level III, cross-sectional study.

Analysis of Risk Factors for Ramp Lesions Associated With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

BACKGROUND

The incidence of meniscocapsular junction tears of the medial meniscus posterior horn, known as ramp lesions, is reported to be 9.3% to 23.9%. However, these lesions are not consistently diagnosed with routine arthroscopic exploration and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

PURPOSE

To determine risk factors associated with ramp lesions in anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 275 patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between June 2011 and March 2019 were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were revisions, fracture histories, and multiple-ligament injuries other than medial collateral ligament injury. Patients were divided into 2 groups, those with and without ramp lesions according to arthroscopic diagnosis. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors: age, sex, body mass index, time from injury to surgery (<3 or ≥3 months), mechanism of injury (contact/noncontact), Segond fracture, side-to-side laxity, location of bone contusion, medial and lateral tibial/meniscal slope, and mechanical axis angle. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve were evaluated. A prediction model was developed by multivariable regression with generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Overall, 95 patients (34.5%) were confirmed as having a ramp lesion. The sensitivity of MRI for ramp lesions was 85.3%, and specificity was 78.3%. Significant risk factors for ramp lesion were as follows: posterior medial tibial plateau bone contusion on MRI (odds ratio [OR], 4.201; 95% CI, 2.081-8.482; P < .001), ≥3 months from injury (OR, 4.818; 95% CI, 2.158-10.757; P < .001), varus knee >3° (OR, 2.339; 95% CI, 1.048-5.217; P = .038), steeper medial tibial slope (OR, 1.289; 95% CI, 1.002-1.66; P = .049) and meniscal slope (OR, 1.464; 95% CI, 1.137-1.884; P = .003), and gradual lateral tibial slope (OR, 0.775; 95% CI, 0.657-0.914; P = .002). The area under the curve for the prediction model developed by logistic regression was 0.779 (sensitivity, 75.8%; specificity, 71.7%; P < .001) for ramp lesions.

CONCLUSION

Care should be taken with patients who have significant risk factors for ramp lesions, including bone contusion at the posterior medial tibial plateau, chronic injury, steeper medial tibial and meniscal slope, gradual lateral tibial slope, and varus knee >3°.

Transtibial pullout repair of the lateral meniscus posterior root tear combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduces lateral meniscus extrusion: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Lateral meniscus (LM) posterior root tear (PRT) is often associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and can result in rotational instability, joint overloading, and degenerative changes in the knee. Improved rotational stability and kinematics have been reported after LMPRT repair. However, it is unclear what repair technique can achieve the greatest reduction in LM extrusion (LME).

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that transtibial pullout repair would decrease LME to a greater extent than other repair techniques.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients with ACL injury and complete LMPRT were evaluated. Nine underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and transtibial pullout repair, and eight underwent ACLR and other repairs such as inside-out suturing. Double-bundle ACLR was performed using hamstring tendons, and LMPRT pullout repair was performed through the bone tunnel for the posterolateral bundle. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed immediately preoperatively and at>6 months postoperatively, and LME was measured from coronal images only.

RESULTS

A significantly greater decrease in the value of LME from pre- to postoperative measurement was observed in the transtibial pullout repair group (-0.5±0.7mm) than in the other-repair group (1.0±0.9mm, p<0.01). Pre- and postoperative LME measurements were not significantly different between the two groups.

DISCUSSION

The most important finding of this study was that transtibial pullout repair resulted in a greater decrease in LME than other repair techniques in patients with ACL injury and LMPRT. This technique might be useful for restoring hoop tension by decreasing LME.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, comparative retrospective study.

Incidence and Healing Rates of Meniscal Tears in Patients Undergoing Repair During the First Stage of 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Meniscal tears, including tears at the root attachment, have been associated with tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in both primary and revision settings. However, there is a paucity of literature reporting the healing rates of meniscal repair during 2-stage revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

PURPOSE

To evaluate the healing rates of meniscal repairs performed during 2-stage revision ACLR in ACL-deficient knees and to report the incidence of meniscus root tears in patients undergoing primary ACLR as compared with revision ACLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary and revision ACLR by a single surgeon were retrospectively identified. Revision ACLRs were grouped according to 1- or 2-stage ACLR. Meniscal tears were grouped according to laterality (medial, lateral) and location of tears. Meniscal repair technique was recorded, including transtibial or inside-out. Meniscal repair healing was assessed via second-look arthroscopy at the time of second-stage revision ACLR.

RESULTS

There were 1168 patients identified who underwent ACLR: 851 primary and 317 revision procedures. Sixty-four patients underwent meniscal repair during first-stage bone grafting in ACL-deficient knees, with an overall healing rate of 86%. The healing rates were 82.3% for meniscus root tears via the transtibial repair technique and 92.4% for meniscal peripheral tears via the inside-out repair technique. Meniscus root tears had overall incidences of 15.5% and 26.2% in primary and revision ACLRs, respectively. The incidence of lateral meniscus posterior root tears was approximately 4 times higher than of medial meniscus posterior root tears in both primary (12.2% vs 3.2%) and revision (20.5% vs 5.6%) ACLRs.

CONCLUSION

A high incidence of meniscus root tears was found in patients undergoing revision ACLRs as compared with primary ACLRs. Meniscal repairs have a high rate of healing and success when performed during the first stage of revision ACLR in ACL-deficient knees.

The Natural History of Meniscus Tears

BACKGROUND

In order to determine whether treatments are effective in the treatment of meniscus tears, it is first necessary to understand the natural history of meniscus tears. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature to ascertain the natural history of meniscus tears in children and adolescents.

METHODS

A search of the Pubmed and Embase databases was performed using the search terms "meniscus tears," "natural history of meniscus tears," "knee meniscus," "discoid meniscus," and "natural history of discoid meniscus tears."

RESULTS

A total of 2567 articles on meniscus tears, 28 articles on natural history of meniscus tears, 8065 articles on "menisci," 396 articles on "discoid meniscus," and only 2 on the "natural history of discoid meniscus" were found. After reviewing the titles of these articles and reviewing the abstracts of 237 articles, it was clear that there was little true long-term natural history data of untreated meniscus tears nor whether treating meniscus tears altered the natural history. Twenty-five articles were chosen as there was some mention of natural history in their studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There are few long-term data on untreated meniscal tears or discoid meniscus, or tears in children and adolescents. The literature suggests that there is a higher incidence of chondral injury and subsequent osteoarthritis, but there are many confounding variables which are not controlled for in these relatively short-term papers.

Arthroscopic Repair of Double Radial Tears of the Lateral Meniscus

Double radial tears of the lateral meniscus are rare injuries that typically occur in the setting of an acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Full-thickness radial tears of the meniscus body and root render the meniscus nonfunctional from a loss of hoop stress resistance. Repair of these tears can normalize contact pressures in the lateral compartment and delay arthritic changes. We describe our technique for repairing a lateral meniscus body radial tear and concomitant posterior root tear, via inside-out suture repair and transtibial suture repair, respectively. This investigation was performed at Mayo Clinic.