Kinematic aligned femoral rotation leads to greater patella tilt but similar clinical outcomes when compared to traditional femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. A propensity score matched study

Kinematic and mechanical alignments in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis with ≥1-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Kinematic and mechanical alignment outcomes in total knee arthroplasty remain controversial. This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of total knee arthroplasty using kinematic and mechanical alignments.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies published before November 2022. The data of interest were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager V.5.4.

RESULTS

Nineteen randomized controlled trials and cohort studies involving 880 kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasties and 965 mechanical alignment total knee arthroplasties were included. In this meta-analysis, the kinematic alignment group achieved better knee joint function scores, including the Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Knee Society Score, and better flexion angles. No statistical differences were detected in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, extension angle, Forgotten Joint Score, European Quality of Life five-dimension measure, hip-knee-ankle angle, or complications between the kinematic and mechanical alignment groups.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis indicated that kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty provides clinical benefits in terms of the Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Knee Society Score (knee), Knee Society Score (function), and better flexion angles. In addition, kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty led to similar clinical outcomes as mechanical alignment total knee arthroplasty without increasing complications.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/CRD42022373227.

Kinematic alignment adequately restores trochlear anatomy, patellar kinematics and kinetics in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Patellofemoral pain, maltracking and instability remain common and challenging complications after total knee arthroplasty. Controversy exists regarding the effect of kinematic alignment on the patellofemoral joint, as it generally leads to more femoral component valgus and internal rotation compared to mechanical alignment. The aim of this systematic review is to thoroughly examine the influence of kinematic alignment on the third space.

METHODS

A systematic search of the Pubmed, Cochrane and Web of Science databases was performed to screen for relevant articles published before 7 April 2024. This led to the final inclusion of 42 articles: 2 cadaveric, 9 radiographic, 12 computer simulation and 19 clinical studies. The risk of bias was evaluated with the risk of bias in non-randomised studies - of interventions tool as the lowest level of evidence of the included clinical studies was IV. The effects of kinematic alignment on patellar kinematics and kinetics, trochlear anatomy reconstruction and patellofemoral complication rate were investigated.

RESULTS

Kinematic alignment closely restores native patellar kinematics and kinetics, better reproduces native trochlear anatomy than mechanical alignment and leads to a 0%-11.4% incidence of patellofemoral complications. A more valgus joint line of the distal femur can cause lateral trochlear undercoverage and a trochlear angle orientation medial to the quadriceps vector when applying kinematic alignment, both of which can be solved by using an adjusted design with a 20.5° valgus trochlea.

CONCLUSION

Kinematic alignment appears to be a safe strategy for the patellofemoral joint in most knees, provided that certain precautions are taken to minimize the risk of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV clinical studies, in vitro research.

Anatomic Referencing of the Distal Femur in Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Impact of Orientation on Femoral Component Size

BACKGROUND

Anatomic referencing in total knee arthroplasty places the femoral component flush to the anterior cortex while maintaining posterior condylar offset (PCO). The intent of this study was to evaluate how component position influences the femoral component size.

METHODS

Digital surface models were created using 446 femora from an established computed tomography database. Virtual bone resections, component sizing, and component placement were performed assuming neutral (0°) flexion and neutral (3°) rotation relative to the posterior condyles. The appropriately sized femoral component, which had 2 mm of incremental size, was placed flush with the anterior cortex for optimal restoration of the PCO. Sizing and placement were repeated using 3 and 6° flexion and 0, 5, and 7° external rotation (ER).

RESULTS

At 0° flexion, decreasing ER from 3 to 0° resulted in an average decreased anterior-posterior height (APH) of 1.9 mm, corresponding to a component size decrease of 1 for 88% of patients. At 7° ER, component size increased by an average of 2.5 mm, corresponding to a size increase for 80% of patients. Flexing the femoral component to 3° with ER at 3° resulted in a decrease in APH of 2.2 mm (1 size decrease in 93% of patients). At 3° flexion and 3° ER, 86% had the same component size as at 0° flexion and 0° ER. Increasing ER at 3° flexion increased APH by 1.2 mm at 5° and 3.1 mm at 7° on average, relative to 3° ER. Increasing flexion from 3 to 6° extended this effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Flexion decreases the APH when the ER is held constant. The ER of the femoral component increases the APH across all tested flexion angles, causing an increase in the ideal femoral component size to maintain PCO. With anatomic referencing, alterations in femoral component positioning and subsequent changes in component size can be accounted for.

Limitations of the knee society score in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

The Knee Society Scoring System (KSS) is a frequently used outcome score which quantifies functional patients' outcomes before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Several problems arise when trying to implement KSS for obtaining postoperative outcomes after more personalised aligned TKAs. Scoring for valgus femorotibial angle (FTA) intervals outside moderate ranges is often poorly explained, the specific version of KSS used for outcome collection is frequently unclear and the exact measuring methods are typically not described in the literature. The aims of this systematic review were to investigate the latest user practice, the application of KSS and its limitations after kinematically aligned (KA) TKA.

Methods

A systematic literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Medline and Scopus to identify potentially relevant articles for this review, published from the beginning of January 2013 until the end of January 2023. Broad Mesh terms such as 'kinematic alignment', 'total knee arthroplasty' and 'knee society score' were used for building search strategy in each database accordingly. Articles reporting postoperative values of the objective surgeon-assessed KSS after KA TKA or KA and mechanically aligned TKA were included. For assessing included randomised control trials (RCTs), an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's design-specific scale for assessing RCTs was used. The non-RCTs were assessed by using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. The Ottawa-Newcastle Score system was also used. Studies were additionally evaluated for their radiological methodology by using a five-question checklist (Radiological Assessment Qualit criteria).

Results

The initial search identified 167 studies, of which 129 were considered for screening. Ten studies reporting outcomes after KA TKA did not use the objective surgeon-assessed part of KSS for clinical outcome measurement, and 30 studies reporting outcomes after KA TKA did not use KSS at all for clinical and/or functional outcomes. From the 10 included studies, only six have used the latest KSS score (2011), the rest using its 1989 variant; and out of these six studies, only two presented values of the FTA, which is needed for calculating the KSS's 'alignment' subcomponent, the rest presenting hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) values. Additionally, when converting these HKA values to FTA intervals, the authors of this systematic review found that KA TKA FTA intervals display limits, which tend to be outside the 'well-scored' KSS anatomical alignment interval.

Conclusion

The inconsistent and nonstandardised use of the surgeon-assessed KSS across studies reviewed compromises assessment reliability and patient outcome scores. To enhance precision and comparability, it is crucial to standardise the KSS application, incorporating personalised alignment strategies for more accurate patient evaluations.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

No difference in postoperative patient satisfaction rates between mechanical and kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review

Purpose

The purpose of this systematic review was to compare patient satisfaction patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) levels after mechanically aligned (MA) and kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

A systematic literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Medline and Scopus to identify potentially relevant articles for this review, published from the beginning of March 2013 until the end of October 2023. Only articles reporting satisfaction after KA TKA, MA TKA or both were included, which use valid and reliable tools for the evaluation and reporting of satisfaction after TKA. Title, authors, year of publication, study design, level of evidence, follow-up period, patients' demographic data, sample size, type of satisfaction score, postoperative satisfaction score, postoperative alignment, statistical significance, as well as other variables, were extracted for analysis. An Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) design-specific scale was used for assessing randomized control trials (RCTs). The nonrandomized control trials were evaluated by using the Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tool. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was also used to assess cohort studies, while case series were evaluated using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series Studies.

Results

The initial search identified 316 studies, of which 178 were considered for screening. Eleven studies completely fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including one RCT, five nonrandomized control trials/quasi-experiments, three case series, and two cohort studies. The total number of patients recruited for MA TKA was 1740. Conversely, 497 patients were enrolled for KA TKA. Five studies used the visual analogue scale (VAS) for assessing postoperative patient satisfaction, four used the Knee Society Score (KSS) 2011 version and two Likert-based types of scores. Overall, the highest mean satisfaction score of KSS 2011 was 31.5 ± 6.6 in the MA group, and 29.8 ± 80 in the KA group in four studies. All of them showed high postoperative patient satisfaction rates for both MA and KA TKA, but with no statistically significant difference between them (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Both mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty, as well as kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty led to high rates of postoperative patient satisfaction, with no statistically significant differences between them.

Level of Evidence

Level III, systematic review.

Individualised compared to off-the-shelf total knee arthroplasty results in lower and less variable patellar tilt

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative patellar tilt at 4 months follow-up in a consecutive series of randomised patients that received individualised or off-the-shelf (OTS) primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis was that patellar tilt would be lower and less variable in patients who received individualised TKA compared to patients who received OTS TKA.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 385 patients randomised (1:1) to receive either OTS TKA or individualised TKA were analysed. Pre- and postoperative radiographs at 4 months were obtained of weight-bearing long leg, anterior-posterior and lateral knee views and a skyline view at 30° of flexion. Postoperative patellar tilt was measured between the anterior femoral line and patellar resection surface (β) and the anterior femoral line and mediolateral patellar axis (σ). Postoperative patellar tilt (absolute value) was compared between the individualised and OTS TKA groups based on preoperative phenotypes of their femoral mechanical angle, tibial mechanical angle and hip-knee-ankle angle. Variability in postoperative patellar tilt was compared using the 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Comparisons of baseline patient characteristics revealed no difference between the individualised and OTS TKA groups. Comparison of absolute postoperative patellar tilt revealed significant differences between individualised and OTS TKA (|β|, 1.0° ± 1.0° and 2.5° ± 2.2°, respectively, p < 0.001; |σ|, 1.7° ± 1.6° and 2.8° ± 2.3°, respectively, p < 0.001). The 95% CI of postoperative patellar tilt (|β|) was narrower in patients that received individualised compared to OTS TKA (0.0° to 3.8° and 0.1° to 8.3°, respectively), irrespective of their preoperative phenotype.

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent individualised TKA had lower and less variable postoperative patellar tilt than those with OTS TKA, irrespective of preoperative phenotype. Individualised TKA allows the decoupling of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints, replicating anatomical trochlear orientation and improving patellar tilt, which could facilitate better clinical outcomes.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study constitutes a part of a larger registered randomised controlled trial comparing patient satisfaction following OTS versus individualised TKA (NCT04460989).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Surgical factors play a critical role in predicting functional outcomes using machine learning in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Predictive models help determine predictive factors necessary to improve functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, no study has assessed predictive models for functional outcomes after TKA based on the new concepts of personalised surgery and new technologies. This study aimed to develop and evaluate predictive modelling approaches to predict the achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) 1 year after TKA.

METHODS

Four hundred thirty robotic-assisted TKAs were analysed in this retrospective study. The mean age was 67.9 ± 7.9 years; the mean body mass index (BMI) was 32.0 ± 6.8 kg/m2. The following PROMs were collected preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively: knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint replacement, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) Function, WOMAC Pain. Demographic data, preoperative CT scan, implant size, implant position on the robotic system and characteristics of the joint replacement procedure were selected as predictive variables. Four machine learning algorithms were trained to predict the MCID status at 1-year post-TKA for each PROM survey. 'No MCID' was chosen as the target. Models were evaluated by class discrimination (F1-score) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC).

RESULTS

The best-performing model was ridge logistic regression for WOMAC Function (area under the curve [AUC]  = 0.80, F1 = 0.48, sensitivity = 0.79, specificity = 0.62). Variables most strongly contributing to not achieving MCID status were preoperative PROMs, high BMI and femoral resection depth (posterior and distal), supporting functional positioning principles. Conversely, variables contributing to a positive outcome (achieving MCID) were medial/lateral alignment of the tibial component, whether the procedure was an outpatient surgery and whether the patient received managed Medicare insurance.

CONCLUSION

The most predictive variables included preoperative PROMs, BMI and surgical planning. The surgical predictive variables were valgus femoral alignment and femoral rotation, reflecting the benefits of personalised surgery. Including surgical variables in predictive models for functional outcomes after TKA should guide clinical and surgical decision-making for every patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Does inverse kinematic alignment coupled with robot-assisted TKA optimize patellofemoral clinical and radiological results?

INTRODUCTION

With a satisfaction rate of 80%, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery has seen significant improvements in recent decades. The 20% of poor results may be explained by the alignment technique used for implant placement, which can influence patellofemoral kinematics. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the use of inverse kinematic alignment makes it possible to obtain satisfactory clinical and radiological patellar scores in robotic TKA.

HYPOTHESIS

The inverse kinematic alignment technique coupled with robotic surgery makes it possible to restore the native kinematics of the patella.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study including 100 TKAs with a primary TKA performed using the Stryker Mako™ robotic surgery system, and the inverse kinematic alignment technique. Patients who underwent patella resurfacing were excluded. Clinical and radiological scores were recorded preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

At one year, the specific patellar clinical scores were excellent with an average Kujala score of 85.69 and an average HSS Patellar score 88.15. The average patellar lateralization index was 0.15 and the average patellar tilt was 5.1°, showing no significant difference compared to preoperation (p=0.45 and p=0.18). The average external rotation of the femoral implant was 0.47±0.6° [-1.9; 2.1].

DISCUSSION

The patellofemoral clinical results were excellent. The use of the robotic arm coupled with this alignment technique makes it possible to obtain a controlled external rotation of the femoral implant as well as an optimized orientation of the tibial component, favoring good restitution of the alignment of the extensor apparatus. This study did not demonstrate any radiological correction of patellar tilt and lateralization.

CONCLUSION

The combined use of robotic surgery with the inverse kinematic alignment technique seems effective on specific clinical results of the patellofemoral joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II; prospective cohort.

Impact of change in coronal plane alignment of knee (CPAK) classification on outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA

BACKGROUND

Mechanical alignment with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been widely used since the implantation of the first prosthetic knee. Multiple studies have reported 80% patient satisfaction with TKA. However, the reported patients' dissatisfaction is believed to be caused by having to convert different knee alignments to neutral alignments. It is postulated that a change in the CPAK classification of knees leads to patient dissatisfaction. Thus, we hypothesized that a change in CPAK classification with robot-assisted TKA with mechanical alignment does not significantly lead to patient dissatisfaction.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 134 patients who underwent robot-assisted mechanical alignment total knee arthroplasty (MA-TKA) using cementless implants and classified them into CPAK system pre- and post-operatively. One year after TKA surgery, we recorded binary responses to patients' satisfaction with the outcome of surgery and analyzed if a change in CPAK classification is associated with the outcome of surgery.

RESULTS

We found that 125 out of 134 patients (93.28%) were happy with the outcome of surgery. CPAK classification was changed in 116 patients (86.57%) and maintained in 18 patients (13.43%). Our results also showed that 111 (95.7%) out of 116 patients who had a change in CPAK and 14 (77.8%) out of 18 patients who maintained their CPAK post-surgery were happy with the outcome of surgery (OR = 6.3, CI 1.741-25.17, P value = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

We concluded that changing the patient's native joint line and CPAK classification does not significantly change the outcome of surgery in terms of satisfaction. The dissatisfaction rate of 20% as published by previous researchers may be confounded by other reasons and not just due to changes in alignment and joint line.

Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Four joint arthroplasty registries (JARs) levels exist based on the recorded data type. Level I JARs are national registries that record primary data. Hospital or institutional JARs (Level II-IV) document further data (patient-reported outcomes, demographic, radiographic). A worldwide list of Level II-IV JARs must be created to effectively assess and categorize these data.

METHODS

Our study is a systematic scoping review that followed the PRISMA guidelines and included 648 studies. Based on their publications, the study aimed to map the existing Level II-IV JARs worldwide. The secondary aim was to record their lifetime, publications' number and frequency and recognise differences with national JARs.

RESULTS

One hundred five Level II-IV JARs were identified. Forty-eight hospital-based, 45 institutional, and 12 regional JARs. Fifty JARs were found in America, 39 in Europe, nine in Asia, six in Oceania and one in Africa. They have published 485 cohorts, 91 case-series, 49 case-control, nine cross-sectional studies, eight registry protocols and six randomized trials. Most cohort studies were retrospective. Twenty-three per cent of papers studied patient-reported outcomes, 21.45% surgical complications, 13.73% postoperative clinical and 5.25% radiographic outcomes, and 11.88% were survival analyses. Forty-four JARs have published only one paper. Level I JARs primarily publish implant revision risk annual reports, while Level IV JARs collect comprehensive data to conduct retrospective cohort studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study mapping all Level II-IV JARs worldwide. Most JARs are found in Europe and America, reporting on retrospective cohorts, but only a few report on studies systematically.

A robotic-assisted simulation of kinematic alignment in TKA leads to excessive valgus and internal rotation in valgus knees

PURPOSE

Strategies to further improve patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty include the introduction of new alignment philosophies and more precise instruments such as navigation and robotics. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a combination of image-based robotic assistance and the use of modern alignment strategies on the resulting joint line obliquity as well as femoral component rotation and to compare this between varus, neutral and valgus knees.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 200 patients who received a robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (MAKO®, Stryker) using functional alignment between 2018 and 2020. The patients were divided into a varus (103 patients), neutral (57 patients) and valgus (40 patients) group. The intraoperatively recorded bone cuts and resulting joint line obliquity were identified and compared to values obtained with a robotic computer simulation of kinematic alignment.

RESULTS

The mean femoral coronal alignment of the varus, neutral and valgus group, respectively, equalled 0.5° (± 1.1°), 1.1° (± 0.8°) and 1.6° (± 0.7°) of valgus with functional alignment and 2.1° (± 2.1°), 4.1° (± 1.7°) and 6.2° (± 1.7°) of valgus with kinematic alignment. The mean femoral axial alignment of the valgus group resulted in 0.8° (± 2.0°) of internal rotation with functional alignment and 3.9° (± 2.8°) of internal rotation with kinematic alignment. Overall, 186 knees (93%) could be balanced while respecting certain safe zones by using functional alignment as opposed to 54 knees (27% and none in the valgus group) when applying kinematic alignment. Kinematic alignment led to a combination of femoral component valgus and internal rotation of more than 3° in 22 valgus knees (55%), 10 neutral knees (18%) and 3 varus knees (3%) compared to none in each group when applying functional alignment with safe zones.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-assisted kinematic alignment leads to a combination of excessive valgus and internal rotation of the femoral component in valgus and to a lesser extent also in neutral knees when compared with functional alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

How to optimize patellar tracking in knee arthroplasty?

Good patellar tracking is needed for functionally successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and depends on several factors. The aim of the present Instructional Lecture is to identify the main factors and how to control them so as to optimize patellar tracking: more or less "patella-friendly" prosthetic trochlea design, requiring precise assessment and choice of model; patellar component design; type of tibial implant; surgical approach and management of peripatellar structures, and any lateral release; distal and posterior femoral bone cuts, determining femorotibial alignment, femoral component rotation and patellar height; tibial implant rotation with respect to the anterior tibial tubercle; patellar cut characteristics in resurfacing. In case of instability or patellar maltracking despite correct implant positioning, there are 2 main surgical techniques: medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, and anterior tibial tubercle medialization. To obtain optimal patellar tracking, correction of other factors should be associated: trochlear component design, distal and posterior femoral bone cuts, tibial implant positioning, patellar component shape and positioning, etc.

Kinematic alignment results in clinically similar outcomes to mechanical alignment: Systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

It is unclear whether a difference in functional outcome exists between kinematically aligned (KA) and mechanically aligned (MA) knee replacements. The aim of this study is to perform a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the available level I-IV evidence.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies comparing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), gait analysis and complications in TKA with KA and MA was performed. Quality assessment was performed for each study using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools.

RESULTS

Twelve randomised controlled trials and fourteen observational studies published between 2014 and 2022 were included in the final analysis. Meta-analysis revealed KA to have significantly better Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (p = 0.02), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) (p = 0.006), Knee Society Score (KSS) Objective Knee (p = 0.03) and KSS Functional Activity (p = 0.008) scores. However, these improvements did not exceed the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) values reported in the literature. Subgroup analysis showed robotic assisted KA-TKA to have a clinically superior FJS (p = 0.0002) and trend towards KSS Objective Knee score (p = 0.10), compared to PSI. Gait and plantar pressure distribution of KA cohorts more closely represented healthy cohorts, and KA showed a weak association of a decreased knee adduction moment (KAM) compared to MA. Differences in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), range of motion and complications were not significant between groups.

CONCLUSION

Although KA results in several improved functional outcomes, these do not reach clinical significance. Further standardised large-scale randomised studies are required to improve the quality of evidence. As it stands, it is difficult to recommend one philosophy over the other.

Kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: An up-to-date meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and imaging parameters of kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to evaluate whether patients undergoing KA-TKA benefited more than those undergoing MA-TKA.

METHODS

Studies comparing the efficacy of KA-TKA and MA-TKA were included after searching and screening in the database, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Database Library. A total of 1420 patients were enrolled in the study, with 736 MA-TKA and 738 KA-TKA. The primary outcomes were postoperative knee function scores including KSS series, WOMAC, KOOS and OKS. Secondary outcomes included the operative time, the length of hospital stay, knee extension/flexion angle, and some imaging parameters. The risk of bias for included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaborative risk-of-bias assessment tool or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale(NOS).

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included in this meta-analysis (11 randomized controlled studies and 5 cohort studies). Primary outcomes: Knee Society score (KSS, MD = 8.36, 95% Cl: 0.83-15.90) and combined KSS (MD = 15.24, 95% CI: 5.41-25.07) were higher in KA-TKA than in MA-TKA, and other functional scores were not statistically significant in KA-TKA and MA-TKA, including knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), Oxford knee score (OKS), Knee Function score (KFS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Secondary outcomes: KA-TKA resulted in smaller medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) compared to MA-TKA. For other outcome measures, KA-TKA showed similar results compared to MA-TKA, including hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, extension/flexion angle, tibial component slope angle, joint line orientation angle (JLOA), the operation time, the length of hospital stay and ligament release rate.

CONCLUSIONS

In our analysis results, patients undergoing KA-TKA benefit as much as patients undergoing MA-TKA. KA may be a viable reference in total knee replacement.

The Trochlear Groove of a Femoral Component Designed for Kinematic Alignment Is Lateral to the Quadriceps Line of Force and Better Laterally Covers the Anterior Femoral Resection Than a Mechanical Alignment Design

Background: A concern about kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is that it relies on femoral components designed for mechanical alignment (MAd-FC) that could affect patellar tracking, in part, because of a trochlear groove orientation that is typically 6° from vertical. KA sets the femoral component coincident to the patient’s pre-arthritic distal and posterior femoral joint lines and restores the Q-angle, which varies widely. Relative to KA and the native knee, aligning the femoral component with MA changes most distal joint lines and Q-angles, and rotates the posterior joint line externally laterally covering the anterior femoral resection. Whether switching from a MAd- to a KAd-FC with a wider trochlear groove orientation of 20.5° from vertical results in radiographic measures known to promote patellar tracking is unknown. The primary aim was to determine whether a KAd-FC sets the trochlear groove lateral to the quadriceps line of force (QLF), better laterally covers the anterior femoral resection, and reduces lateral patella tilt relative to a MAd-FC. The secondary objective was to determine at six weeks whether the KAd-FC resulted in a higher complication rate, less knee extension and flexion, and lower clinical outcomes. Methods: Between April 2019 and July 2022, two surgeons performed sequential bilateral unrestricted caliper-verified KA TKA with manual instruments on thirty-six patients with a KAd- and MAd-FC in opposite knees. An observer measured the angle between a line best-fit to the deepest valley of the trochlea and a line representing the QLF that indicated the patient’s Q-angle. When the trochlear groove was lateral or medial relative to the QLF, the angle is denoted + or −, and the femoral component included or excluded the patient’s Q-angle, respectively. Software measured the lateral undercoverage of the anterior femoral resection on a Computed Tomography (CT) scan, and the patella tilt angle (PTA) on a skyline radiograph. Complications, knee extension and flexion measurements, Oxford Knee Score, KOOS Jr, and Forgotten Joint Score were recorded pre- and post-operatively (at 6 weeks). A paired Student’s T-test determined the difference between the KA TKAs with a KAd-FC and MAd-FC with a significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The final analysis included thirty-five patients. The 20.5° trochlear groove of the KAd-FC was lateral to the QLF in 100% (15 ± 3°) of TKAs, which was greater than the 69% (1 ± 3°) lateral to the QLF with the 6° trochlear groove of the MAd-FC (p < 0.001). The KAd-FC’s 2 ± 1.9 mm lateral undercoverage of the anterior femoral resection was less than the 4.4 ± 1.5 mm for the MAd-FC (p < 0.001). The PTA, complication rate, knee extension and flexion, and clinical outcome measures did not differ between component designs. Conclusions: The KA TKA with a KAd-FC resulted in a trochlear groove lateral to the QLF that included the Q-angle in all patients, and negligible lateral undercoverage of the anterior femoral resection. These newly described radiographic parameters could be helpful when investigating femoral components designed for KA with the intent of promoting patellofemoral kinematics.

Six Commonly Used Postoperative Radiographic Alignment Parameters Do Not Predict Clinical Outcome Scores after Unrestricted Caliper-Verified Kinematically Aligned TKA

Background: Unrestricted caliper-verified kinematically aligned (KA) TKA restores patient’s prearthritic coronal and sagittal alignments, which have a wide range containing outliers that concern the surgeon practicing mechanical alignment (MA). Therefore, knowing which radiographic parameters are associated with dissatisfaction could help a surgeon decide whether to rely on them as criteria for revising an unhappy patient with a primary KA TKA using MA principles. Hence, we determined whether the femoral mechanical angle (FMA), hip–knee–ankle angle (HKAA), tibial mechanical angle (TMA), tibial slope angle (TSA), and the indicators of patellofemoral tracking, including patella tilt angle (PTA) and the lateral undercoverage of the trochlear resection (LUCTR), are associated with clinical outcome scores. Methods: Forty-three patients with a CT scan and skyline radiograph after a KA TKA with PCL retention and medial stabilized design were analyzed. Linear regression determined the strength of the association between the FMA, HKA angle, PTS, PTA, and LUCTR and the forgotten joint score (FJS), Oxford knee score (OKS), and KOOS Jr score obtained at a mean of 23 months. Results: There was no correlation between the FMA (range 2° varus to −10° valgus), HKAA (range 10° varus to −9° valgus), TMA (range 10° varus to −0° valgus), TSA (range 14° posterior to −4° anterior), PTA (range, −10° medial to 14° lateral), and the LUCTR resection (range 2 to 9 mm) and the FJS (median 83), the OKS (median 44), and the KOOS Jr (median 85) (r = 0.000 to 0.079). Conclusions: Surgeons should be cautious about using postoperative FMA, HKAA, TMA, TSA, PTA, and LUCTR values within the present study’s reported ranges to explain success and dissatisfaction after KA TKA.

Radiofrequency Plantar Fascia Coblation With and Without Gastrocnemius Recession in the Management of Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis

BACKGROUND

Plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of plantar heel pain. Although most are self-limiting, recalcitrant conditions can be debilitating, significantly reducing patient's quality of life. A myriad of surgical procedures are available for the treatment of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis (RPF) with little consensus on best practice. This purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of radiofrequency coblation with and without gastrocnemius release on the surgical management of RPF.

METHODS

Between June 2013 and June 2019, a total of 128 patients with RPF and tight gastrocnemius were treated surgically. Presence of tight gastrocnemius was assessed clinically by a positive Silfverskiold test. Group A (n = 73) consisted of patients who underwent radiofrequency coblation alone; group B (n = 55) consisted of patients who underwent radiofrequency coblation and endoscopic gastrocnemius recession. The primary outcome measure was visual analog scale (VAS) score. Secondary outcome measures included (1) American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score; (2) physical (PCS) and mental component summaries (MCS) of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; (3) overall assessment of improvement, expectation fulfilment, and satisfaction; and (4) complication rates.

RESULTS

Both groups reported significant improvement in VAS, AOFAS, and PCS scores postoperatively at 6 and 24 months. Group B (radiofrequency coblation with gastrocnemius recession) was associated with better VAS at both 6 months (3.0 ± 2.9 vs 1.7 ± 2.6, P < .05) and 24 months postoperatively (1.9 ± 3.1 vs 0.8 ± 2.0, P < .05) compared with group A (radiofrequency coblation without gastrocnemius recession). At 24 months postoperatively, no differences were found in AOFAS, PCS, MCS scores, expectation fulfilment, or overall satisfaction. No wound complications were reported in either group. One patient (group B) has persistent symptoms consistent with tarsal tunnel syndrome.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective cohort comparative study, treatment of RPF with radiofrequency coblation alone was associated with slightly inferior results than radiofrequency coblation combined with endoscopic gastrocnemius recession in terms of pain relief without an increase in complication rates. However, at 2 years, we did not find a significant difference in other measures of outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

An anatomo-functional implant positioning technique with robotic assistance for primary TKA allows the restoration of the native knee alignment and a natural functional ligament pattern, with a faster recovery at 6 months compared to an adjusted mechanical technique

PURPOSE

An anatomo-functional implant positioning (AFIP) technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) could restore physiological ligament balance (symmetric gap in extension, asymmetric gap in flexion). The purposes were to compare (1) ligament balancing in extension and flexion after TKA in the AFIP group, (2) TKA alignment, implant positioning and patellar tracking between AFIP and adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA) techniques, (3) clinical outcomes between both groups at 12 months.

METHODS

All robotic-assisted TKA with an AFIP technique were included (n = 40). Exclusion criteria were genu valgum (HKA angle > 183°), extra-articular deformity more than 10°, and patellar maltracking (high-grade J-sign). One control patient with a TKA implanted by an aMA technique was matched for each case, based on age, body mass index, sex, and knee alignment. Ligament balancing (medial and lateral gaps in millimeters) in full extension and at 90° of flexion after TKA in the AFIP group was assessed with the robotic system. TKA alignment (HKA angle), implants positioning (femoral and tibial coronal axis, tibial slope, joint-line orientation), patellar tracking (patellar tilt and translation) and the Knee Society Score (KSS) at 6 and 12 months were compared between both groups. The ligament balancing was compared using a t test for paired samples in the AFIP group. The radiographic measurements and KSS scores were compared between groups using a t test for independent samples.

RESULTS

In the AFIP group, there was no significant difference between the medial and lateral gap laxity in extension (NS). A significant opening of the lateral gap was observed in flexion compared to extension (mean: + 2.9 mm; p < 0.0001). The mean postoperative HKA angle was comparable between both groups (177.3° ± 2.1 in the AFIP group vs 176.8° ± 3.2; NS). In the AFIP group, the femoral anatomy was restored (90.9° ± 1.6) and the tibial varus was partially corrected (87.4° ± 1.8). The improvement of Knee and Function KSS at 6 months was better in the AFIP group (59.3 ± 11.9 and 51.7 ± 20, respectively, versus 49.3 ± 9.7 and 20.8 ± 13; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The AFIP concept allowed the restoration of the native knee alignment and a natural functional ligament pattern. With a more physiological target for ligament balancing, the AFIP technique had equivalent clinical outcomes at 12 months compared to aMA, with a faster recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III retrospective therapeutic case control series.

Association of Elevated Body Mass Index and Outcomes of Arthroscopic Treatment for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Background:

Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) are a common condition found in patients with chronic ankle pain after previous ankle sprains. Surgical management is indicated after conservative management has failed.

Hypothesis/Purpose:

This study evaluates the influence of body mass index (BMI) on the early clinical outcomes of arthroscopic debridement and microfracture of OLTs.

Methods:

A total of 252 patients with symptomatic OLTs who failed conservative management underwent arthroscopic debridement and microfracture of OLTs over the affected ankle between 2007 and 2017. Patients from this cohort were divided into 2 groups based on BMI: the normal BMI group (NB Group) (BMI 18.5-25.0) and overweight and obese BMI group (OB Group) (BMI ≥25). Visual analogue scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score, and the physical and mental component summaries of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (PCS and MCS, respectively) were prospectively collected from the cohort during their standard postoperative outpatient follow-up.

Results:

The NB Group (n=105) and OB Group (n=147) were well matched demographically. The operative duration was significantly shorter for the NB Group compared to the OB Group. Patients from both groups had significant improvements in VAS, AOFAS, and PCS scores postoperatively at 6 and 24 months after surgery ( P < .05). Between both groups, patients had comparable VAS, AOFAS, and PCS scores at preoperation, 6 months postoperation, and 24 months postoperation ( P > .05). However, MCS in the OB Group was lower at 24 months postoperatively compared with the NB Group ( P < .05). The OB Group reported better satisfaction scores (82.4% vs 72.6%, P < .05), and a greater proportion had their expectations met (88.2% vs 77.9%, P < .05).

Conclusion:

A BMI ≥25 was not associated with worse postoperative pain and functional outcomes, but rather was found to be associated with greater satisfaction and fulfillment. However, patients with BMI ≥25 required longer procedure duration and had poorer MCS scores at 24 months after surgery. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

No difference between resurfaced and non-resurfaced patellae with a modern prosthesis design: a prospective randomized study of 250 total knee arthroplasties

PURPOSE

Despite numerous well-conducted studies and meta-analyses, the management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between patients with and without patellar resurfacing and to determine the influence of resurfacing on patellar tracking with a "patella-friendly" prosthesis.

METHODS

A single-centered prospective randomized controlled study was performed between April 2017 and November 2018. Two hundred and forty-five consecutive patients (250 knees) scheduled for TKA were randomized for patellar resurfacing or patella non-resurfacing. All patients received the same total knee prosthesis and were evaluated clinically and radiologically, including the International Knee Society Score (KSS knee and function), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), anterior knee pain (AKP), pain when climbing stairs, patellar tilt, and patellar translation.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-nine knees were available for clinical evaluation and 221 knees for radiographic analysis. The revision rate for patellofemoral cause was 3.1% (7 cases) with no difference between the groups (p = 0.217). There was no difference in survival rate between patellar resurfacing (88.3%) and non-resurfacing (85.3%) after 24 months (p = 0.599). There were no differences in KSS functional component (p = 0.599), KSS knee component (p = 0.396), FJS (p = 0.798), and AKP (p = 0.688) at a mean follow-up of 18 months. There was twice as much stair pain for the non-resurfacing group (17.1% versus 8.5%) (p = 0.043). There was patellar tilt in 43% of resurfaced knees (n = 50/116) versus 29% in non-resurfaced knees (n = 30/105) (p = 0.025); however, there was more patellar translation in the non-resurfaced group (21.0% versus 7.8%) (p < 0.001). There were no specific complications attributed to the patellar resurfacing procedure. There were four secondary patellar resurfacing procedures (3.6%) in the non-resurfaced group after a mean of 10 ± 7 months (1-17) postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

There is no superiority of patellar resurfacing or non-resurfacing in terms of clinical or radiological outcomes at mid-term. Secondary patellar resurfacing is rare. There is not enough evidence to recommend systematic patellar resurfacing with a "patella-friendly" prosthesis.

Patellar tilt does not affect patient reported outcomes after modern total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The focus of patella maltracking after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has traditionally been on patella polyethylene damage and failure mechanisms rather than functional outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of patellar tilt on patient reported outcomes (PROMS) after primary TKA performed with patellar resurfacing.

METHODS

A retrospective review using a single implant design was performed. Patella tilt was radiographically measured according to a standardized protocol. PROMS related to pain, function, and satisfaction were evaluated preoperatively and at minimum 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 468 TKAs were included for analysis. Mean age and BMI were 64 years and 35 kg/m²; respectively while 63% of patients were female. The median follow-up period was 12.7 months. Overall, patellar tilt was corrected from a median of 5.0 degrees preoperatively to a median of 3.0 degrees postoperatively. Preoperative, postoperative, and the change in patellar tilt had no significant effects on PROMS at minimum 1-year follow-up (p ≥ 0.092). Satisfaction in knee function while getting out of bed was higher for patients with approximately the same patellar tilt before and after TKA compared to patients with an increase in lateral patellar tilt (95% vs 80%, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

The range of patellar tilt studied in this cohort had little to no effect on PROMS. However, suboptimal patellar tracking may potentiate edge loading of the polyethylene and contribute to implant damage in the long-term. These results are helpful to focus efforts on the tibiofemoral articulation as the predominant determinant of patient outcomes.

Intraoperative patellar maltracking and postoperative radiographic patellar malalignment were more frequent in cases of complete medial collateral ligament release in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patellar maltracking after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can lead to significant patellofemoral complications such as anterior knee pain, increased component wear, and a higher risk of component loosening, patellar fracture, and instability. This study was to investigate the preoperative and operative variables that significantly affect patellar tracking after cruciate-retaining TKA.

METHODS

We studied 142 knee joints in patients who had undergone TKA: the knees were dichotomized based on postoperative patellar tracking, which was evaluated on patellar skyline, axial-projection radiographs: group 1, normal patellar tracking (lateral tilt ≤ 10° and displacement ≤ 3 mm) and group 2, patellar maltracking (lateral tilt > 10° or displacement > 3 mm). The patients' demographic data and clinical and radiographic measurements obtained before and after surgery were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Preoperative lateral patellar displacement was greater (4.1 ± 2.6 mm vs. 6.0 ± 3.5 mm), as was the frequency of medial collateral ligament (MCL) release (3/67 vs. 24/75) in group 2 than in group 1 (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The distal femur was cut in a greater degree of valgus in group 1 than in group 2. (6.3 ± 0.8° vs. 6.0 ± 0.8°) (p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Complete release of the MCL during surgery was associated with patellar maltracking (logistic regression: p = 0.005, odds ratio = 20.592). Surgeons should attend to patellar tracking during surgery in medially tight knees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study, level III.