Efficacy and safety of bifeprunox in patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, dose-finding study

Discovery and structure - activity relationships of 2,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl pyrimidine derivatives as selective D5 receptor partial agonists

Dopamine receptors are therapeutic targets for the treatment of various neurological and psychiatric disorders, including Parkinson's and Alzheimer's. Previously, PF-06649751 (tavapadon), PF-2562 and PW0464 have been discovered as potent and selective G protein-biased D1/D5 receptor agonists with optimal pharmacokinetic properties. However, no selective D5R agonist has been reported yet. In this context, we designed and synthesized forty non-catecholamines-based pyrimidine derivatives and identified four pyrimidine derivatives as selective D5R partial agonists. Using cAMP-based GloSensor assay in transiently transfected HEK293T cells with human D1 or D5 receptors, we discovered that compound 5c (4-(4-bromophenyl)-6-(2,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)pyrimidin-2-amine) exhibited modest D5R agonist activity. This leads us to explore various modifications of this scaffold to improve the D5 agonist potency and efficacy. Using molecular docking, and rational design followed by their evaluation at D1 and D5 receptors for agonist activity, we identified three new derivatives, 5j, 5h, and 5e. The most potent compound of this series 5j (4-(4-iodophenyl)-6-(2,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)pyrimidin-2-amine), exhibited EC50 of 269.7 ± 6.6 nM. Mice microsomal stability studies revealed that 5j is quite stable (>70 % at 1 hr). Furthermore, pharmacokinetic analysis of 5j (20 mg/kg, p.o) in C57BL/6j mice showed that 5j is readily absorbed via oral route of dosing and also enters into the brain (plasma Tmax: 1 h, Cmax: 51.10 ± 13.51 ng/ml; Brain Tmax: 0.5 h, Cmax: 22.54 ± 4.08 ng/ml). We further determined the in-vivo effect of 5j on cognition in scopolamine-induced amnesia in C57BL/6j mice. We observed that 5j (10 mg/kg, p.o) alleviated scopolamine-induced impairment in short-term memory and social recognition, which were blocked by D1/D5 antagonist SCH23390 (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.). Furthermore, 5j did not exhibit any cytotoxicity (up to 10 µM) or in vivo acute toxicity up to 200 mg/kg (p.o). These results strongly suggest that 5j could be further developed for treating neurological disorders wherein the D5 receptors play pivotal roles.

Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain: Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Weight gain is among the most important side-effects of antipsychotics. It is, however, unclear whether it is associated with antipsychotic doses. We aimed to fill this gap with a dose-response meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched multiple electronic databases (last update search June 2021) for all fixed-dose studies that investigated 16 second-generation antipsychotics and haloperidol in adults with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or with negative symptoms. We estimated the dose-response curves by conducting random-effects dose-response meta-analyses. We used the restricted cubic spline to model the dose-response relationship. The primary outcome was mean weight gain in kg from baseline to endpoint, the secondary outcome was the number of patients with clinically important weight gain.

FINDINGS

Ninety-seven studies with 333 dose arms (36 326 participants) provided data for meta-analyses. Most studies were short-term with median duration of 6 weeks (range 4 to 26 weeks). In patients with acute exacerbation, amisulpride, aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, haloperidol, lumateperone, and lurasidone produced mild weight gain in comparison to placebo (mean difference at any dose≤1 kg), while more significant weight gain was observed by all other drugs. For most drugs, dose-response curves showed an initial dose-related increase in weight which plateaued at higher doses, while for others there was no plateau and some even had bell-shaped curves, meaning less weight gain to be associated with higher doses.

INTERPRETATION

Second-generation antipsychotics do not only differ in their propensity to produce weight gain, but also in the shapes of their dose-response curves. This information is important for dosing decisions in clinical practice.

Response efficacy and heterogeneity of antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: Systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUNDS

This meta-analysis aimed to assess antipsychotic and placebo effects in patients with schizophrenia at the level of symptom factors.

METHODS

A systematic literature search up to June 2020 was undertaken and 62 studies were included, with 23,478 patients with schizophrenia at the study baseline point. We calculated mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. The comparison was made according to the study content using a continuous method with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Patients with schizophrenia treated by antipsychotic drugs had a significantly lower psychiatric rating scale total score; lower clinical global impression of severity; lower positive and negative syndrome scale; and lower assessment of negative symptoms total score, when compared to placebo treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with schizophrenia treated with an antipsychotic drug show a much greater improvement and lower inconsistency in the level of symptom factors when compared to the effects of placebo. Our findings evidence for a comparatively homogeneous outcome of the antipsychotic-treatment in improving schizophrenia symptoms. This opposes the notion of the presence of patient sub-groups with treatment non-responsive schizophrenia.

Examining Side Effect Variability of Antipsychotic Treatment in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Meta-analysis of Variance

Side effects of antipsychotic drugs play a key role in nonadherence of treatment in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). While clinical observations suggest that side effect variability between patients may be considerable, statistical evidence is required to confirm this. Here, we hypothesized to find larger side effect variability under treatment compared with control. We included double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with a diagnosis of SSD treated with 1 out of 14 antipsychotics. Standard deviations of the pre-post treatment differences of weight gain, prolactin levels, and corrected QT (QTc) times were extracted. The outcome measure was the variability ratio of treatment to control for individual antipsychotic drugs and the overall variability ratio of treatment to control across RCTs. Individual variability ratios were weighted by the inverse-variance method and entered into a random-effects model. We included N = 16 578 patients for weight gain, N = 16 633 patients for prolactin levels, and N = 10 384 patients for QTc time. Variability ratios (VR) were significantly increased for weight gain (VR = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02-1.14; P = .004) and prolactin levels (VR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.17-1.62; P < .001) but did not reach significance for QTc time (VR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.98-1.12; P = 0.135). We found marked differences between individual antipsychotics and increased variability in side effects in patients under treatment with antipsychotics suggesting that subgroups of patients or individual patients may benefit from treatment allocation through stratified or personalized medicine.

Neuronal Dopamine D3 Receptors: Translational Implications for Preclinical Research and CNS Disorders

Dopamine (DA), as one of the major neurotransmitters in the central nervous system (CNS) and periphery, exerts its actions through five types of receptors which belong to two major subfamilies such as D1-like (i.e., D1 and D5 receptors) and D2-like (i.e., D2, D3 and D4) receptors. Dopamine D3 receptor (D3R) was cloned 30 years ago, and its distribution in the CNS and in the periphery, molecular structure, cellular signaling mechanisms have been largely explored. Involvement of D3Rs has been recognized in several CNS functions such as movement control, cognition, learning, reward, emotional regulation and social behavior. D3Rs have become a promising target of drug research and great efforts have been made to obtain high affinity ligands (selective agonists, partial agonists and antagonists) in order to elucidate D3R functions. There has been a strong drive behind the efforts to find drug-like compounds with high affinity and selectivity and various functionality for D3Rs in the hope that they would have potential treatment options in CNS diseases such as schizophrenia, drug abuse, Parkinson’s disease, depression, and restless leg syndrome. In this review, we provide an overview and update of the major aspects of research related to D3Rs: distribution in the CNS and periphery, signaling and molecular properties, the status of ligands available for D3R research (agonists, antagonists and partial agonists), behavioral functions of D3Rs, the role in neural networks, and we provide a summary on how the D3R-related drug research has been translated to human therapy.

Evaluation of Differences in Individual Treatment Response in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

An assumption among clinicians and researchers is that patients with schizophrenia vary considerably in their response to antipsychotic drugs in randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the overall variation in individual treatment response from random variation by comparing the variability between treatment and control groups.

DATA SOURCES

Cochrane Schizophrenia, MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL, BIOSIS Previews, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from January 1, 1955, to December 31, 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, RCTs of adults with a diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorders and prescription for licensed antipsychotic drugs.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Means and SDs of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale pretreatment and posttreatment outcome difference scores were extracted. Data quality and validity were ensured by following the PRISMA guidelines.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The outcome measure was the overall variability ratio of treatment to control in a meta-analysis across RCTs. Individual variability ratios were weighted by the inverse-variance method and entered into a random-effects model. A personal element of response was hypothesized to be reflected by a substantial overall increase in variability in the treatment group compared with the control group.

RESULTS

An RCT was simulated, comprising 30 patients with schizophrenia randomized to either the treatment or the control group. The different components of variation in RCTs were illustrated with simulated data. In addition, we assessed the variability ratio in 52 RCTs involving 15 360 patients with a schizophrenia or schizoaffective diagnosis. The variability was slightly lower in the treatment compared with the control group (variability ratio = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99; P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, no evidence was found in RCTs that antipsychotic drugs increased the outcome variance, suggesting no personal element of response to treatment but instead indicating that the variance was slightly lower in the treatment group than in the control group; although the study cannot rule out that subsets of patients respond differently to treatment, it suggests that the average treatment effect is a reasonable assumption for the individual patient.

Brexpiprazole has a low risk of dopamine D2 receptor sensitization and inhibits rebound phenomena related to D2 and serotonin 5-HT2A receptors in rats

Background

Long‐term antipsychotic treatment in patients with schizophrenia can induce supersensitivity psychosis and tardive dyskinesia which is thought to be caused by dopamine D₂ receptor sensitization. We evaluated the effects of brexpiprazole on D₂ receptor sensitivity after subchronic treatment in rats. We also evaluated whether brexpiprazole could suppress enhanced response to D₂ receptors in rats subchronically dosed with another atypical antipsychotic.

Methods

The maximum D₂ receptor density (B_max) and apomorphine (a D₂ receptor agonist)‐induced stereotypy were measured in rats orally dosed with vehicle, haloperidol (1 mg/kg), or brexpiprazole (4 or 30 mg/kg for B_max, 6 or 30 mg/kg for stereotypy) for 21 days. Then, effects of oral administrations of brexpiprazole (3 mg/kg), aripiprazole (10 mg/kg), and olanzapine (3 mg/kg) against increases in apomorphine‐induced hyperlocomotion and (±)‐2,5‐dimethoxy‐4‐iodoamphetamine hydrochloride (DOI: a 5‐HT_2A receptor agonist)‐induced head twitches were evaluated in rats subcutaneously treated with risperidone (1.5 mg/kg/d) via minipumps for 21 days.

Results

Haloperidol and brexpiprazole (30 mg/kg: approximately tenfold ED₅₀ of anti‐apomorphine‐induced stereotypy) but not brexpiprazole (4 or 6 mg/kg) significantly increased the B_max and apomorphine‐induced stereotypy. Brexpiprazole (3 mg/kg) and olanzapine (3 mg/kg) significantly suppressed both increases in apomorphine‐induced hyperlocomotion and also DOI‐induced head twitches in rats subchronically treated with risperidone, but aripiprazole (10 mg/kg) significantly suppressed only apomorphine‐induced hyperlocomotion.

Conclusion

Brexpiprazole has a low risk of D₂ receptor sensitization after a repeated administration and suppresses the rebound phenomena related to D₂ and 5‐HT_2A receptors after a repeated administration of risperidone.

Brexpiprazole has less potential to evoke dopamine D2 receptor supersensitivity in rats after repeated administration compared to haloperidol. In addition, brexpiprazole may have a lower risk for producing rebound symptoms associated with D2 receptor, 5‐HT2A receptor sensitization when switching from other antipsychotics such as risperidone.

Modulation by chronic antipsychotic administration of PKA- and GSK3β-mediated pathways and the NMDA receptor in rat ventral midbrain

RATIONALE

Antipsychotics exert therapeutic effects by modulating various cellular signalling pathways and several types of receptors, including PKA- and GSK3β-mediated signalling pathways, and NMDA receptors. The ventral midbrain, mainly containing the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and substantia nigra (SN), are the nuclei with dopamine origins in the brain, which are also involved in the actions of antipsychotics. Whether antipsychotics can modulate these cellular pathways in the ventral midbrain is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the effects of antipsychotics, including aripiprazole (a dopamine D₂ receptor (D₂R) partial agonist), bifeprunox (a D₂R partial agonist), and haloperidol (a D₂R antagonist) on the PKA- and GSK3β-mediated pathways and NMDA receptors in the ventral midbrain.

METHODS

Male rats were orally administered aripiprazole (0.75 mg/kg, t.i.d. (ter in die)), bifeprunox (0.8 mg/kg, t.i.d.), haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg, t.i.d.) or vehicle for either 1 week or 10 weeks. The levels of PKA, p-PKA, Akt, p-Akt, GSK3β, p-GSK3β, Dvl-3, β-catenin, and NMDA receptor subunits in the ventral midbrain were assessed by Western Blots.

RESULTS

The results showed that chronic antipsychotic treatment with aripiprazole selectively increased PKA activity in the VTA. Additionally, all three drugs elevated the activity of the Akt-GSK3β signalling pathway in a time-dependent manner, while only aripiprazole stimulated the Dvl-3-GSK3β-β-catenin signalling pathway in the SN. Furthermore, chronic administration with both aripiprazole and haloperidol decreased the expression of NMDA receptors.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that activating PKA- and GSK3β-mediated pathways and downregulating NMDA receptor expression in the ventral midbrain might contribute to the clinical effects of antipsychotics.

Meta-analysis of Dropout Rates in Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trials of Atypical Antipsychotics Assessed by PANSS

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Subject dropout rates in placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of antipsychotics are high. The missing values due to dropout represent a potential source of bias in clinical trials. We aimed to identify the potential factors affecting subject dropout in atypical antipsychotics RCTs by conducting a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Placebo-controlled RCTs for atypical antipsychotics using positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) as a psychiatric assessment scale were selected by database search. The potential factors affecting subject dropout, such as publication year, study design, and operational factors, were analyzed by meta-regression.

RESULTS

Forty-seven placebo controlled RCTs of atypical antipsychotics of which results were published between 1993 and 2018 were identified through the database search. In the multivariate meta-regression analysis, earlier publication year, older age of subjects, and longer study duration were significantly associated with high subject dropout rates in placebo-controlled clinical trials of atypical antipsychotics.

CONCLUSION

Subject dropout rates in clinical trials of atypical antipsychotics published between 1993 and 2018 year decreased over time. Study duration should be taken into consideration when designing future studies, where short study periods yet appropriate for evaluating the efficacy of new atypical antipsychotics are preferable. Additionally, previous medications and the degree of subject satisfaction with antipsychotics might affect subject dropout rate.

Meta-analysis of Placebo Response in Randomized Clinical Trials of Antipsychotic Drugs Using PANSS Focusing on Different Approaches to the Handling of Missing Data

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Schizophrenia treatment has been shifting to resocialization by efficacious antipsychotic drugs. However, even some of the pivotal studies of approved new antipsychotic drugs with proven efficacy had failed due to high placebo response. The aim of this study was to identify the potential factors affecting placebo response by meta-analysis for randomized clinical trials for antipsychotic drugs using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) focusing on the current methodological change in the handling of missing data [from last observation carried forward (LOCF) to mixed-effect models for repeated measures (MMRM)] for successful future clinical trials.

METHODS

Recent trends in the degree of placebo response were investigated between publication year (1993 to 2016) and the mean change of PANSS total score in the placebo arm. The potential factors affecting the degree of placebo response, such as study design and operational factors, were analyzed separately by meta-regression for LOCF- and MMRM-based data.

RESULTS

There was no correlation between publication year and the mean change of PANSS score in the placebo arm in schizophrenia studies of 10 years applying MMRM. The number of countries and treatment setting in MMRM-based data and study duration in LOCF-based data were significantly associated with placebo response.

CONCLUSION

Placebo response in schizophrenia clinical trials published between 2007 and 2016 has not increased over time. Differences in the healthcare environment among countries were suggested to affect the evaluation of antipsychotic drugs. Further analyses on the potential factors of placebo response for MMRM-based data are required.

In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of PCC0104005, a Novel Modulator of Serotonin-Dopamine Activity, as an Atypical Antipsychotic Drug

PCC0104005 is a novel drug candidate for treating schizophrenia that displays high affinity for serotonin, dopamine, and noradrenaline receptors, including partial agonism at dopamine D₂, D₃, D₄, serotonin 5-HT_1A, and 5-HT_2A receptors and antagonism at 5-HT_2B, 5-HT₆, and 5-HT₇ receptors. PCC0104005 blocks MK-801-induced hyperactivity in rats, consistent with the reduction in dopamine D₂ receptor stimulation and increased dopamine release in the medial prefrontal cortex. PCC0104005 inhibits 5-HTP-induced head twitches in rats, due to its moderate affinity for human 5-HT_2A receptors (Ki = 5.1 nM). PCC0104005 significantly reduced the escape latency of rats and improved the MK-801-induced memory impairment. In the object recognition experiment, PCC0104005 significantly improved the recognition disorder induced by MK-801. PCC0104005 did not significantly increase the plasma prolactin level, which is thought to be related to the preferential affinity of PCC0104005 for dopamine D₂ receptors compared with 5-HT_1A receptors, as well as the relative antagonistic activity toward the D₂ receptor. Due to its 5-HT_1A agonism, PCC0104005 does not produce catalepsy in mice, a behaviour predictive of the occurrence of extra-pyramidal syndrome (EPS) in humans. PCC0104005 has unique affinities for dopamine receptors and serotonin receptors, which may lead to clinical advantages, as well as fewer adverse reactions.

Bifeprunox versus placebo for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Bifeprunox is a novel antipsychotic drug designed to treat schizophrenia. However, research into the drug was ceased in 2009 due to rejection of licence to go to market by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), who could not approve the drug for acute or long-term symptoms of schizophrenia because more research was required to demonstrate convincing effects "beyond those already achieved" with currently licenced drugs. There were also concerns expressed over one death of a person whilst on the drug.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical and adverse effects of bifeprunox for people with schizophrenia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Trials Register on 23 October 2015, which is based on regular searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, BIOSIS, AMED, PubMed, PsycINFO, and clinical trials registries. There are no language, date, document type, or publication status limitations for inclusion of records in the register.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised clinical trials focusing on bifeprunox versus placebo for schizophrenia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data independently. For binary outcomes, we calculated risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we estimated the mean difference (MD) between groups and its 95% CI. We employed a random-effects model for analyses. We assessed risk of bias for included studies and created 'Summary of findings' tables using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We found evidence of missing data and poor reporting. When bifeprunox 20 mg was compared with placebo for schizophrenia, the drug resulted in a reduction of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) positive subscale score regarding positive symptoms (n = 549, 2 RCTs, MD -1.89, 95% CI -2.85 to -0.92, low-quality evidence) and the PANSS negative subscale regarding negative symptoms (n = 549, 2 RCTs, MD -1.53, 95% CI -2.37 to -0.69, low-quality evidence). There was a clear improvement regarding deterioration in the bifeprunox 20 mg group (n = 231, 1 RCT, RR 0.71 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.93, very low-quality evidence). The total number of participants with equal to or greater than 7% weight increase was similar between bifeprunox and placebo (n = 483, 1 RCT, RR 1.02 95% CI 0.31 to 3.33 moderate-quality evidence). There were no useable data for quality of life, economic outcomes, and service use.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed some positive effects and a favourable adverse effect profile for bifeprunox, although there were few data overall and none were of high quality. It would seem that these data alone would not have been enough for the FDA to decide to halt progress of the drug to market. We can only assume that we are missing important data. Both the FDA and the relevant pharmaceutical companies have not made all relevant data accessible. As some of these trials also involved an additional haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone arm, these data are not only relevant to evaluation of bifeprunox. In not making all data accessible, it is hard to see how the FDA and the drug companies have fulfilled their full obligations to people with schizophrenia or their clinicians.

Chronic administration of aripiprazole activates GSK3β-dependent signalling pathways, and up-regulates GABAA receptor expression and CREB1 activity in rats

Aripiprazole is a D2-like receptor (D2R) partial agonist with a favourable clinical profile. Previous investigations indicated that acute and short-term administration of aripiprazole had effects on PKA activity, GSK3β-dependent pathways, GABAA receptors, NMDA receptor and CREB1 in the brain. Since antipsychotics are used chronically in clinics, the present study investigated the long-term effects of chronic oral aripiprazole treatment on these cellular signalling pathways, in comparison with haloperidol (a D2R antagonist) and bifeprunox (a potent D2R partial agonist). We found that the Akt-GSK3β pathway was activated by aripiprazole and bifeprunox in the prefrontal cortex; NMDA NR2A levels were reduced by aripiprazole and haloperidol. In the nucleus accumbens, all three drugs increased Akt-GSK3β signalling; in addition, both aripiprazole and haloperidol, but not bifeprunox, increased the expression of Dvl-3, β-catenin and GABAA receptors, NMDA receptor subunits, as well as CREB1 phosphorylation levels. The results suggest that chronic oral administration of aripiprazole affects schizophrenia-related cellular signalling pathways and markers (including Akt-GSK3β signalling, Dvl-GSK3β-β-catenin signalling, GABAA receptor, NMDA receptor and CREB1) in a brain-region-dependent manner; the selective effects of aripiprazole on these signalling pathways might be associated with its unique clinical effects.

Aripiprazole Increases the PKA Signalling and Expression of the GABAA Receptor and CREB1 in the Nucleus Accumbens of Rats

The GABAA receptor is implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and regulated by PKA signalling. Current antipsychotics bind with D2-like receptors, but not the GABAA receptor. The cAMP-responsive element-binding protein 1 (CREB1) is also associated with PKA signalling and may be related to the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. This study investigated the effects of antipsychotics in modulating D2-mediated PKA signalling and its downstream GABAA receptors and CREB1. Rats were treated orally with aripiprazole (0.75 mg/kg, ter in die (t.i.d.)), bifeprunox (0.8 mg/kg, t.i.d.), haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg, t.i.d.) or vehicle for 1 week. The levels of PKA-Cα and p-PKA in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), nucleus accumbens (NAc) and caudate putamen (CPu) were detected by Western blots. The mRNA levels of Gabrb1, Gabrb2, Gabrb3 and Creb1, and their protein expression were measured by qRT-PCR and Western blots, respectively. Aripiprazole elevated the levels of p-PKA and the ratio of p-PKA/PKA in the NAc, but not the PFC and CPu. Correlated with this elevated PKA signalling, aripiprazole elevated the mRNA and protein expression of the GABAA (β-1) receptor and CREB1 in the NAc. While haloperidol elevated the levels of p-PKA and the ratio of p-PKA/PKA in both NAc and CPu, it only tended to increase the expression of the GABAA (β-1) receptor and CREB1 in the NAc, but not the CPu. Bifeprunox had no effects on PKA signalling in these brain regions. These results suggest that aripiprazole has selective effects on upregulating the GABAA (β-1) receptor and CREB1 in the NAc, probably via activating PKA signalling.

Aripiprazole and Haloperidol Activate GSK3β-Dependent Signalling Pathway Differentially in Various Brain Regions of Rats

Aripiprazole, a dopamine D₂ receptor (D₂R) partial agonist, possesses a unique clinical profile. Glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β)-dependent signalling pathways have been implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and antipsychotic drug actions. The present study examined whether aripiprazole differentially affects the GSK3β-dependent signalling pathways in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), nucleus accumbens (NAc), and caudate putamen (CPu), in comparison with haloperidol (a D₂R antagonist) and bifeprunox (a D₂R partial agonist). Rats were orally administrated aripiprazole (0.75 mg/kg), bifeprunox (0.8 mg/kg), haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) or vehicle three times per day for one week. The levels of protein kinase B (Akt), p-Akt, GSK3β, p-GSK3β, dishevelled (Dvl)-3, and β-catenin were measured by Western Blots. Aripiprazole increased GSK3β phosphorylation in the PFC and NAc, respectively, while haloperidol elevated it in the NAc only. However, Akt activity was not changed by any of these drugs. Additionally, both aripiprazole and haloperidol, but not bifeprunox, increased the expression of Dvl-3 and β-catenin in the NAc. The present study suggests that activation of GSK3β phosphorylation in the PFC and NAc may be involved in the clinical profile of aripiprazole; additionally, aripiprazole can increase GSK3β phosphorylation via the Dvl-GSK3β-β-catenin signalling pathway in the NAc, probably due to its relatively low intrinsic activity at D₂Rs.

Brexpiprazole: so far so good

This article describes the role of a newly approved antipsychotic agent brexpiprazole in the treatment of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. This drug has high affinity for 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, D2 and α1B,2C receptors. It displays partial agonism at 5-HT1A and D2 receptors and potent antagonism at 5-HT2A and α1B,2C adrenergic receptors. It also has some affinity (antagonism) for D3, 5-HT2B, 5-HT7 and α1A,1D receptors, and moderate affinity for H1 and low affinity for M1 receptors. These all lead to a favorable antipsychotic profile in terms of improvement of cognitive performance and sleep patterns, as well as effects on affective states and potential to treat core symptoms in schizophrenia and major depressive disorder, including cognitive deficits with a low risk of adverse effects (extrapyramidal symptoms, metabolic complications, weight gain, akathisia potential) that are commonly encountered with other typical and second-generation antipsychotic drugs. In our review, we have made an attempt to decipher the pharmacological profile of brexpiprazole from two major trials (VECTOR and BEACON). We have also tried to give a concise but detailed overview of brexpiprazole by head to head comparison of the pharmacological profile of brexpiprazole and its earlier congeners aripiprazole and prototype antipsychotic drug chlorpromazine by accessing individual summaries of product characteristics from the US Food and Drug Administration database, 2015. Relevant preclinical and clinical studies associated with this drug have been discussed with emphasis on efficacy and safety concerns. From the studies done so far, it can be concluded that brexpiprazole can be an effective monotherapy for schizophrenia and as an adjunct to other antidepressant medications in major depressive disorder.

Dopamine Targeting Drugs for the Treatment of Schizophrenia: Past, Present and Future

Schizophrenia is a chronic and debilitating neuropsychiatric disorder affecting approximately 1% of the world's population. This disease is associated with considerable morbidity placing a major financial burden on society. Antipsychotics have been the mainstay of the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia for decades. The traditional typical and atypical antipsychotics demonstrate clinical efficacy in treating positive symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions, while are largely ineffective and may worsen negative symptoms, such as blunted affect and social withdrawal, as well as cognitive function. The inability to treat these latter symptoms may contribute to social function impairment associated with schizophrenia. The dysfunction of multiple neurotransmitter systems in schizophrenia suggests that drugs selectively targeting one neurotransmission pathway are unlikely to meet all the therapeutic needs of this heterogeneous disorder. Often, however, the unintentional engagement of multiple pharmacological targets or even the excessive engagement of intended pharmacological targets can lead to undesired consequences and poor tolerability. In this article, we will review marketed typical and atypical antipsychotics and new therapeutic agents targeting dopamine receptors and other neurotransmitters for the treatment of schizophrenia. Representative typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs and new investigational drug candidates will be systematically reviewed and compared by reviewing structure-activity relationships, pharmacokinetic properties, drug metabolism and safety, pharmacological properties, preclinical data in animal models, clinical outcomes and associated side effects.

The preclinical profile of brexpiprazole: what is its clinical relevance for the treatment of psychiatric disorders?

Brexpiprazole is a serotonin-dopamine activity modulator in clinical development for schizophrenia, adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder, agitation in Alzheimer's disease and post-traumatic stress disorder. It is a partial agonist at 5-HT1A and D2 receptors with similar potency, and an antagonist at 5-HT2A and adrenergic α1B/2C receptors. Compared with aripiprazole, brexpiprazole is more potent at 5-HT1A receptors and displays less intrinsic activity at D2 receptors. This unique serotonin and dopamine modulatory activity has shown robust antipsychotic, antidepressant-like and anxiolytic activities, and limited extrapyramidal symptom liability with pro-cognitive efficacy in animal models. Phase III clinical trials have been successfully completed in schizophrenia and adjunctive use in major depressive disorder, with the US FDA approval obtained for these uses; Phase III studies in Alzheimer's disease and post-traumatic stress disorder are ongoing.

Update on the Mechanism of Action of Aripiprazole: Translational Insights into Antipsychotic Strategies Beyond Dopamine Receptor Antagonism

Dopamine partial agonism and functional selectivity have been innovative strategies in the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia and mood disorders and have shifted the concept of dopamine modulation beyond the established approach of dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) antagonism. Despite the fact that aripiprazole was introduced in therapy more than 12 years ago, many questions are still unresolved regarding the complexity of the effects of this agent on signal transduction and intracellular pathways, in part linked to its pleiotropic receptor profile. The complexity of the mechanism of action has progressively shifted the conceptualization of this agent from partial agonism to functional selectivity. From the induction of early genes to modulation of scaffolding proteins and activation of transcription factors, aripiprazole has been shown to affect multiple cellular pathways and several cortical and subcortical neurotransmitter circuitries. Growing evidence shows that, beyond the consequences of D2R occupancy, aripiprazole has a unique neurobiology among available antipsychotics. The effect of chronic administration of aripiprazole on D2R affinity state and number has been especially highlighted, with relevant translational implications for long-term treatment of psychosis. The hypothesized effects of aripiprazole on cell-protective mechanisms and neurite growth, as well as the differential effects on intracellular pathways [i.e. extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)] compared with full D2R antagonists, suggest further exploration of these targets by novel and future biased ligand compounds. This review aims to recapitulate the main neurobiological effects of aripiprazole and discuss the potential implications for upcoming improvements in schizophrenia therapy based on dopamine modulation beyond D2R antagonism.

Dose equivalents for second-generation antipsychotics: the minimum effective dose method

BACKGROUND

Clinicians need to know the right antipsychotic dose for optimized treatment, and the concept of dose equivalence is important for many clinical and scientific purposes.

METHODS

We refined a method presented in 2003, which was based on the minimum effective doses found in fixed-dose studies. We operationalized the selection process, updated the original findings, and expanded them by systematically searching more recent literature and by including 13 second-generation antipsychotics. To qualify for the minimum effective dose, a dose had to be significantly more efficacious than placebo in the primary outcome of at least one randomized, double-blind, fixed-dose trial. In a sensitivity analysis, 2 positive trials were required. The minimum effective doses identified were subsequently used to derive olanzapine, risperidone, haloperidol, and chlorpromazine equivalents.

RESULTS

We reviewed 73 included studies. The minimum effective daily doses/olanzapine equivalents based on our primary approach were: aripiprazole 10 mg/1.33, asenapine 10 mg/1.33, clozapine 300 mg/40, haloperidol 4 mg/0.53, iloperidone 8 mg/1.07, lurasidone 40 mg/5.33, olanzapine 7.5 mg/1, paliperidone 3 mg/0.4, quetiapine 150 mg/20, risperidone 2 mg/0.27, sertindole 12 mg/1.60, and ziprasidone 40 mg/5.33. For amisulpride and zotepine, reliable estimates could not be derived.

CONCLUSIONS

This method for determining antipsychotic dose equivalence entails an operationalized and evidence-based approach that can be applied to the various antipsychotic drugs. As a limitation, the results are not applicable to specific populations such as first-episode or refractory patients. We recommend that alternative methods also be updated in order to minimize further differences between the methods and risk of subsequent bias.

Quantitative systems pharmacology as an extension of PK/PD modeling in CNS research and development

Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) is a recent addition to the modeling and simulation toolbox for drug discovery and development and is based upon mathematical modeling of biophysical realistic biological processes in the disease area of interest. The combination of preclinical neurophysiology information with clinical data on pathology, imaging and clinical scales makes it a real translational tool. We will discuss the specific characteristics of QSP and where it differs from PK/PD modeling, such as the ability to provide support in target validation, clinical candidate selection and multi-target MedChem projects. In clinical development the approach can provide additional and unique evaluation of the effect of comedications, genotypes and disease states (patient populations) even before the initiation of actual trials. A powerful property is the ability to perform failure analysis. By giving examples from the CNS R&D field in schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease, we will illustrate how this approach can make a difference for CNS R&D projects.

Neurobiological background for the development of new drugs in schizophrenia

Psychopharmacology of schizophrenia has remained static for many years because the mechanisms explored have been basically monoaminergics, primarily focused toward the modification of dopaminergic function and, later on, serotonergic. In fact, most of the antipsychotics introduced in clinical practice in the last years have been antagonists or selective agonists of these receptors (D(2)/5-HT(2)). The exploration of other receptor pathways, and in particular those additionally involved in the action of the paradigmatic "atypical" antipsychotic clozapine (ie, cholinergic and noradrenergic), has not been very significant. Besides, research in the antipsychotics field has developed also by exploring pathways that are beyond the spectrum of clozapine. Among the most promising mechanisms are those based on the glutamatergic hypothesis of schizophrenia (agonists at the glycine-binding modulatory site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor, glycine transporter inhibitors, modulators of the AMPA [α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid] receptor and selective agonists of the metabotropic receptor Glu(2)). Other less classic pathways are also under study and have led to some agents that are found in very early stages of development such as those acting on sigma receptors, cholecystokinin antagonists, neurotensin agonists, neurokinin receptor antagonists, GABAergic (+-aminobutyric acid [GABA]) enhancers, and cannabinoid(gamma-aminobutiric) receptor modulators.

Serotonergic mechanisms as targets for existing and novel antipsychotics

A variety of serotonin (5-HT) receptors, especially 5-HT(2A), 5-HT(1A), 5-HT(6), 5-HT(7), and 5-HT(2C), have been postulated to contribute to the mechanism of action of atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs), i.e., APDs which cause fewer extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) at clinically optimal doses, in contrast with typical APDs, which are more likely to cause EPS. This advantage, rarely disputed, has made such drugs the preferred treatment for schizophrenia and other indications for APDs. These 5-HT receptors are still of interest as components of novel multireceptor or stand-alone APDs, and potentially to remediate cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Almost all currently available atypical APDs are 5-HT(2A) receptor inverse agonists, as well as dopamine (DA) D(2) receptor antagonists or partial agonists. Amisulpride, an exceptional atypical APD, has 5-HT(7) antagonism to complement its DA D(2/3) antagonism. Some atypical APDs are also 5-HT(1A) partial agonists, 5-HT(6), or 5-HT(7) antagonists, or some combination of the above. 5-HT(2C) antagonism has been found to contribute to the metabolic side effects of some atypical APDs, whereas 5-HT(2C) agonists have potential as stand-alone APDs and/or cognitive enhancers. This review will provide an update of current preclinical and clinical evidence for the role of these five 5-HT receptors in the actions of current APDs and for the development of novel psychotropic drugs.

Partial agonists in schizophrenia--why some work and others do not: insights from preclinical animal models

While dopamine D2 receptor partial agonists (PAs) have been long considered for treating schizophrenia, only one, aripiprazole, is clinically available for therapeutic use. This raises critically important questions as to what is unique about aripiprazole and to what extent animal models can predict therapeutic success. A number of PAs whose clinical fate is known: aripiprazole, preclamol, terguride, OPC-4392 and bifeprunox were compared to haloperidol (a reference antipsychotic) in several convergent preclinical animal models; i.e. amphetamine-induced locomotion (AIL) and conditioned avoidance response (CAR), predictive of antipsychotic effects; unilateral nigrostriatal lesioned rats, a model of hypo-dopaminergia; striatal Fos induction, a molecular marker for antipsychotic activity; and side-effects common to this class of drugs: catalepsy (motor side-effects) and prolactaemia. The results were compared across drugs with reference to their measured striatal D2 receptor occupancy. All the PAs occupied striatal D2 receptors in a dose dependent manner, inhibited AIL and CAR, and lacked motor side-effects or prolactinaemia despite D2 receptor occupancy exceeding 80%. At comparative doses, aripiprazole distinguished itself from the other PAs by causing the least rotation in the hypo-dopaminergic model (indicating the least intrinsic activity) and showed the highest Fos expression in the nucleus accumbens (indicating functional D2 antagonism). Although a number of PAs are active in antipsychotic animal models, not all of them succeed. Given that only aripiprazole is clinically available, it can be inferred that low functional intrinsic activity coupled with sufficient functional antagonism as reflected in the animal models may be a marker of success.

Comparative pharmacology of antipsychotics possessing combined dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor properties

RATIONALE

There is increasing interest in antipsychotics intended to manage positive symptoms via D(2) receptor blockade and improve negative symptoms and cognitive deficits via 5-HT(1A) activation. Such a strategy reduces side-effects such as the extrapyramidal syndrome (EPS), weight gain, and autonomic disturbance liability.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to review pharmacological literature on compounds interacting at both 5-HT(1A) and D(2) receptors (as well as at other receptors), including aripiprazole, perospirone, ziprasidone, bifeprunox, lurasidone and cariprazine, PF-217830, adoprazine, SSR181507, and F15063.

METHODS

We examine data on in vitro binding and agonism and in vivo tests related to (1) positive symptoms (e.g., psychostimulant-induced hyperactivity or prepulse inhibition deficit), (2) negative symptoms (e.g., phencyclidine-induced social interaction deficits and cortical dopamine release), and (3) cognitive deficits (e.g., phencyclidine or scopolamine-induced memory deficits). EPS liability is assessed by measuring catalepsy and neuroendocrine impact by determining plasma prolactin, glucose, and corticosterone levels.

RESULTS

Compounds possessing "balanced" 5-HT(1A) receptor agonism and D(2) antagonism (or weak partial agonism) and, in some cases, combined with other beneficial properties, such as 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonism, are efficacious in a broad range of rodent pharmacological models yet have a lower propensity to elicit EPS or metabolic dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent compounds exhibiting combined 5-HT(1A)/D(2) properties may be effective in treating a broader range of symptoms of schizophrenia and be better tolerated than existing antipsychotics. Nevertheless, further investigations are necessary to evaluate recent compounds, notably in view of their differing levels of 5-HT(1A) affinity and efficacy, which can markedly influence activity and side-effect profiles.

In vitro pharmacology of aripiprazole, its metabolite and experimental dopamine partial agonists at human dopamine D2 and D3 receptors

Aripiprazole is the first dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor partial agonist successfully developed and ultimately approved for treatment of a broad spectrum of psychiatric and neurological disorders. Aripiprazole's dopamine D(2) and serotonin 5-HT(1A) receptor partial agonist activities have been postulated to confer clinical efficacy without marked sedation, and a relatively favorable overall side-effect profile. Using aripiprazole's unique profile as a benchmark for new dopamine partial agonist development may facilitate discovery of new antipsychotics. We conducted an in vitro comparative analysis between aripiprazole, and its human metabolite OPC-14857 (7-(4-[4-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-1-piperazinyl)butoxy)-2(1H)-quinolinone)); RGH-188 (trans-1-[4-[2-[4-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)piperazine-1-yl]ethyl]cyclohexyl]-3,3-dimethylurea), and its metabolite didesmethyl-RGH-188 (DDM-RGH-188); as well as bifeprunox, sarizotan, N-desmethylclozapine (NDMC; clozapine metabolite), and SDZ 208-912 (N-[(8α)-2-chloro-6-methylergolin-8-yl]-2,2-dimethylpropanamide). In vitro pharmacological assessment included inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation and the reversal of dopamine-induced inhibition in clonal Chinese hamster ovary cell lines expressing D(2S), D(2L), D(3) Ser-9 and D(3) Gly-9 for human dopamine receptors. All test compounds behaved as dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor partial agonists. Aripiprazole's intrinsic activity at dopamine D(2S) and D(2L) receptors was similar to that of OPC-14857 and RGH-188; lower than that of dopamine and bifeprunox; and higher than that of DDM-RGH-188, SDZ 208-912, sarizotan, and NDMC. Aripiprazole's intrinsic activity at dopamine D(3) Ser-9 and D(3) Gly-9 receptors was similar to that of OPC-14857 and sarizotan; lower than that of dopamine, bifeprunox, RGH-188 and DDM-RGH-188; and higher than that of SDZ 208-912 and NDMC. A consolidated assessment of these findings may help defining the most appropriate magnitude of intrinsic activity at dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptors for clinical efficacy and safety.

Newer molecules in the treatment of schizophrenia: A clinical update

Schizophrenia is a heterogeneous psychiatric disorder in which multiple neurotransmitter systems have been implicated. Increased and decreased dopamine transmission in the subcortical meso-limbic and meso-cortical systems is closely linked to the “positive” and “negative” symptoms of schizophrenia, respectively. Important roles have also been found for serotonin and acetylcholine, both of which are closely linked to dopamine. An abnormality in glutamate functioning involving N-methyl-D-aspartic acid as well as other receptor subtypes may underlie the dopamine dysfunction observed in schizophrenia. Since the discovery of chlorpromazine in 1952, researchers have been developing new molecules targeting various neurotransmitter systems to maximize their efficacy and tolerability. The advancements in molecular genetics have opened up new horizons to manipulate the post-receptor protein cascade and gene expression. Although the magic-wand still eludes us, the newer molecules hold a lot of promise in this condition.

Emerging drugs for schizophrenia

INTRODUCTION

Since the development of clozapine, scores of antipsychotics have been introduced. These are, with one exception (aripiprazole), based on the pharmacological principle of 5-HT(2)/dopamine antagonism. Research on other treatment targets, which, in part, influence dopaminergic pathways directly or indirectly, is mounting. Managing psychotic symptoms is only one facet of successful treatment of schizophrenia. Effective remedies against negative symptoms and cognitive deficits are still an unmet clinical need.

AREAS COVERED

With the focus on the topics mentioned above, the authors briefly review the latest clinical research organized on the basis of receptor systems and other drug targets, which are discussed to be involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

EXPERT OPINION

In conclusion, although clinicians will have to have considerable patience before truly novel anti-schizophrenia treatments become obtainable, a number of interesting leads with considerable theoretical potential are being explored. As yet, it is difficult to predict which of these mechanisms will effectively augment the currently available treatments.

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the dopamine D₃ receptor antagonist ABT-925 in patients with acute schizophrenia

There is substantial preclinical and clinical evidence to suggest a potential role for the dopamine D₃ receptor in the treatment of schizophrenia. ABT-925 is a selective dopamine D₃ receptor antagonist with an approximately 100-fold higher in vitro affinity for dopamine D₃ versus D₂ receptors. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, escalating-dose, parallel-group study assessed the efficacy and safety of ABT-925 in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. One hundred fifty-five patients were assessed over a 6-week double-blind treatment period (placebo: n = 48; ABT-925 50 mg once daily [QD]: n = 53; ABT-925 150 mg QD: n = 54). The primary efficacy measure was mean change from baseline to final evaluation on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. Secondary measures of efficacy and pharmacokinetic parameters were also assessed. Safety assessments included adverse event monitoring, laboratory tests, vital signs, movement rating scales, and electrocardiogram measures. No statistically significant treatment effect was observed with ABT-925 50 mg QD or 150 mg QD compared with placebo on primary or secondary efficacy end points. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates increased with dose in a linear fashion. ABT-925 50 mg QD and 150 mg QD were generally well tolerated, with adverse event profiles similar to that of placebo. Findings from a concurrent positron emission tomography study among healthy volunteers suggest that the ABT-925 doses used in this study may not have been sufficient to adequately occupy D₃ receptors, thereby underscoring the importance of pharmacodynamic markers, such as PET, in determining appropriate compound doses before embarking on studies in a target population.

Paliperidone ER and oral risperidone in patients with schizophrenia: a comparative database analysis

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of paliperidone extended-release (ER) with risperidone immediate-release using propensity score methodology.

METHODS

Six double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, short-term clinical trials for acute schizophrenia with availability of individual patient-level data were identified (3 per compound). Propensity score pairwise matching was used to balance observed covariates between the paliperidone ER and risperidone patient populations. Scores were generated using logistic regression models, with age, body mass index, race, sex, baseline Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and baseline Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score as factors. The dosage range of paliperidone ER (6-12 mg/day) was compared with 2 risperidone dosage ranges: 2-4 and 4-6 mg/day. The primary efficacy measure was change in PANSS total score at week 6 end point. Tolerability end points included adverse event (AE) reports and weight. AEs with rates ≥ 5% and with a ≥ 2% difference between paliperidone ER and risperidone were identified.

RESULTS

Completion rates for placebo-treated subjects in paliperidone ER trials (n = 95) and risperidone trials (n = 122) groups were 36.8% and 51.6%, respectively; end point changes on PANSS total scores were similar (p = 0.768). Completion rates for subjects receiving paliperidone ER 6-12 mg/day (n = 179), risperidone 2-4 mg/day (n = 113) or risperidone 4-6 mg/day (n = 129) were 64.8%, 54.0% and 66.7%, respectively (placebo-adjusted rates: paliperidone ER vs risperidone 2-4 mg/day, p = 0.005; paliperidone ER vs risperidone 4-6 mg/day, p = 0.159). PANSS total score improvement with paliperidone ER was greater than with risperidone 2-4 mg/day (difference in mean change score, -6.7; p < 0.05) and similar to risperidone 4-6 mg/day (0.2; p = 0.927). Placebo-adjusted AEs more common with paliperidone ER were insomnia, sinus tachycardia and tachycardia; more common with risperidone were somnolence, restlessness, nausea, anxiety, salivary hypersecretion, akathisia, dizziness and nasal congestion. Weight changes with paliperidone ER and risperidone were similar (paliperidone ER vs risperidone 2-4 mg/day, p = 0.489; paliperidone ER vs risperidone 4-6 mg/day, p = 0.236).

CONCLUSIONS

This indirect database analysis suggested that paliperidone ER 6-12 mg/day may be more efficacious than risperidone 2-4 mg/day and as efficacious as risperidone 4-6 mg/day. The AE-adjusted incidence rates suggest differences between treatments that may be relevant for individual patients. Additional randomized, direct, head-to-head clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of asenapine in schizophrenia

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Asenapine is a new atypical antipsychotic medication with high affinity for D(2) and 5HT(2A) receptors that has been approved by the FDA in adults for the acute treatment of schizophrenia in the USA. The purpose of this review is to describe the compound and examine whether it addresses some of the unmet clinical needs in treating schizophrenia.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The development of asenapine is described with attention to its chemistry, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile. Preclinical and clinical trials of safety and efficacy are reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages of asenapine relative to other antipsychotic medications are discussed.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Asenapine will be evaluated for whether it: i) causes a reduction in symptoms of schizophrenia; ii) has a side-effect profile minimizing extrapyramidal symptoms, weight gain and cardiac effects; and iii) affects negative and/or cognitive symptoms.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Asenapine is a recently approved agent with an acceptable cardiometabolic profile and exhibits similar efficacy as other antipsychotic medications, primarily on positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Relatively less weight gain compared with other agents may confer a notable advantage. Sublingual administration may have positive and negative effects on patient compliance. Potential 'pro-cognitive' effects of asenapine are preliminary and require more investigation.

Not all partial dopamine D(2) receptor agonists are the same in treating schizophrenia. Exploring the effects of bifeprunox and aripiprazole using a computer model of a primate striatal dopaminergic synapse

Species differences in physiology and unique active human metabolites contribute to the limited predictive value of preclinical rodent models for many central nervous system (CNS) drugs. In order to explore possible drivers for this translational disconnect, we developed a computer model of a dopaminergic synapse that simulates the competition among three agents and their binding to pre- and postsynaptic receptors, based on the affinities for their targets and their actual concentrations. The model includes presynaptic autoreceptor effects on neurotransmitter release and modulation by presynaptic firing frequency and is calibrated with actual experimental data on free dopamine levels in the striatum of the rodent and the primate. Using this model, we simulated the postsynaptic dopamine D(2) receptor activation levels of bifeprunox and aripiprazole, two relatively similar dopamine D(2) receptor agonists. The results indicate a substantial difference in dose-response for the two compounds when applying primate calibration parameters as opposed to rodent calibration parameters. In addition, when introducing the major human and rodent metabolites of aripiprazole with their specific pharmacological activities, the model predicts that while bifeprunox would result in a higher postsynaptic D(2) receptor antagonism in the rodent, aripiprazole would result in a higher D(2) receptor antagonism in the primate model. Furthermore, only the highest dose of aripiprazole, but not bifeprunox, reaches postsynaptic functional D(2) receptor antagonism similar to 4 mg haloperidol in the primate model. The model further identifies a limited optimal window of functionality for dopamine D(2) receptor partial agonists. These results suggest that computer modeling of key CNS processes, using well-validated calibration paradigms, can increase the predictive value in the clinical setting of preclinical animal model outcomes.

Third generation antipsychotic drugs: partial agonism or receptor functional selectivity?

Functional selectivity is the term that describes drugs that cause markedly different signaling through a single receptor (e.g., full agonist at one pathway and antagonist at a second). It has been widely recognized recently that this phenomenon impacts the understanding of mechanism of action of some drugs, and has relevance to drug discovery. One of the clinical areas where this mechanism has particular importance is in the treatment of schizophrenia. Antipsychotic drugs have been grouped according to both pattern of clinical action and mechanism of action. The original antipsychotic drugs such as chlorpromazine and haloperidol have been called typical or first generation. They cause both antipsychotic actions and many side effects (extrapyramidal and endocrine) that are ascribed to their high affinity dopamine D(2) receptor antagonism. Drugs such as clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone and others were then developed that avoided the neurological side effects (atypical or second generation antipsychotics). These compounds are divided mechanistically into those that are high affinity D(2) and 5-HT(2A) antagonists, and those that also bind with modest affinity to D(2), 5-HT(2A), and many other neuroreceptors. There is one approved third generation drug, aripiprazole, whose actions have been ascribed alternately to either D(2) partial agonism or D(2) functional selectivity. Although partial agonism has been the more widely accepted mechanism, the available data are inconsistent with this mechanism. Conversely, the D(2) functional selectivity hypothesis can accommodate all current data for aripiprazole, and also impacts on discovery compounds that are not pure D(2) antagonists.

Metabolic side effects of antipsychotic drug treatment--pharmacological mechanisms

Obesity and metabolic syndrome, with increased risk of eventual cardiovascular disease and type II diabetes, are significant problems for patients receiving antipsychotic drugs and are likely contribute to their decreased life expectancy. Several drug-related mechanisms may contribute to these problems, including effects both influencing food intake and on glucose and lipid metabolism. The metabolic consequences of different antipsychotic drugs vary substantially; these variations reflect differences in receptor pharmacology and provide clues as to the underlying pharmacological mechanisms. The two drugs with the greatest effects on body weight, olanzapine and clozapine, also have high affinity for the 5-HT2C and histamine H1 receptors, which implicate these receptors in antipsychotic-induced weight gain, while peripheral M3 muscarinic receptor antagonism as well as central 5-HT2C effects may contribute to obesity-independent diabetes. Other receptor mechanisms may have additive or synergistic effects; dopamine D2 receptor antagonism can enhance 5-HT2C-mediated effects on food intake, as well as influencing lipid and glucose metabolism via disinhibition of prolactin secretion. Pharmacogenetic associations of drug-induced weight gain with 5-HT2C receptor and leptin gene polymorphisms, among others, have provided further clues. Elevated leptin secretion in the absence of a decrease in food intake indicates drug-induced leptin insensitivity in the hypothalamus. The minimal weight gain seen with ziprasidone and aripiprazole may reflect their having further pharmacological effects that protect against changes in food intake and related metabolic factors. Understanding the pharmacology of metabolic consequences of current antipsychotic drug treatment is clearly the key to developing improved pharmacotherapies that avoid these problematic and limiting adverse effects.

Bifeprunox and aripiprazole suppress in vivo VTA dopaminergic neuronal activity via D2 and not D3 dopamine autoreceptor activation

Bifeprunox and aripiprazole are two novel antipsychotics presenting partial agonistic activity for the D(2) and D(3) dopamine (DA) receptors. Using in vivo electrophysiological paradigms in anaesthetized rats, we have previously shown that both drugs independently inhibit the spontaneous firing and bursting activity of ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopaminergic neurons and partially reverse the suppressing effect of the full DA receptor agonist apomorphine. Moreover, we have also shown that the D(2/3) receptor antagonist haloperidol prevents the inhibitory effects of these antipsychotics, confirming their partial D(2)-like agonistic activities [L. Dahan, H. Husum, O. Mnie-Filali, J. Arnt, P. Hertel, N. Haddjeri, Effects of bifeprunox and aripiprazole on rat serotonin and dopamine neuronal activity and anxiolytic behaviour, J. Psychopharmacol. (2009)]. In the present electrophysiological study, selective antagonists of D(2) and D(3) receptors were used to further characterize the inhibitory role of bifeprunox and aripiprazole on the D(2) and D(3) receptors in vivo. Administration of bifeprunox (250 microg/kg, i.v.) or aripiprazole (300 microg/kg, i.v.) reduced the firing activity of VTA DA neurons by 40-50%. The bursting activity was reduced by 95% and 77% by bifeprunox and aripiprazole, respectively. Systemic administration of the preferential D(3) receptor antagonist GR218,231 (200 microg/kg, i.v.) did not modify the inhibitory effect of bifeprunox or aripiprazole, either on the firing or on the bursting activity. On the other hand, the preferential D(2) receptor antagonist L741,626 (500 microg/kg, i.v.) completely blocked the inhibitory effect of both bifeprunox and aripiprazole on the VTA DA neuronal activity. The present study shows that bifeprunox and aripiprazole behave as partial D(2), but not D(3), receptor agonists in vivo, inhibiting the firing activity (preferentially the phasic activity) of VTA DA cells.

Antipsychotics in the early stage of development

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this article, we will summarize some of the most recent pharmacological approaches by briefly reviewing the latest research results related to different neurotransmitter receptor systems but also alternative approaches that do not affect central nervous system receptors directly.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the field still struggles with the lack of major breakthroughs, some novel pharmacological leads have provided encouraging findings in proof of concept or early phase II clinical trials. Although some of these approaches are based on the modified dopamine/glutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia, others appear to have been driven by more serendipitous observations. Apart from this, more traditional routes such as compounds targeting D2/HT2 receptors are also still being pursued. Attempts to advance treatment response of negative symptoms and cognitive impairment, two areas of considerable unmet need have been an overriding theme in many studies.

SUMMARY

Clinical psychopharmacologists increasingly realize that it is highly unlikely that we have a magic bullet to treat adequately all aspects of this complex disorder in the foreseeable future. Rational polypharmacy may be the trend for the next decade.

Upcoming agents for the treatment of schizophrenia: mechanism of action, efficacy and tolerability

Since the introduction of a group of atypical antipsychotics in the 1990s, there has been a decline in the rate of new antipsychotics being introduced into clinical practice. However, with increasing safety and efficacy concerns over currently available drugs and a dearth of options available for atypical depot formulations, there is a considerable need for the development of new formulations and agents. This review examines the profile of seven antipsychotic drugs currently in the premarketing stage of development and summarizes their mechanism of action, clinical potential and safety.Asenapine is an antipsychotic with activity for multiple receptors and has potential to improve negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. Bifeprunox is a partial dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist showing a less than convincing efficacy profile, but which may offer safety advantages over available agents by means of a reduced risk of metabolic complications. Iloperidone is a D2 and 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist requiring further studies to establish its effectiveness. It has a high affinity for alpha(1)-adrenoceptors, which can lead to associated haemodynamic adverse effects. Nemonapride is essentially a typical antipsychotic drug, similar in structure to sulpiride, which has been available for some time in Japan. It has efficacy against positive symptoms and has shown some antidepressant and anxiolytic properties, although efficacy data for it are somewhat limited. Norclozapine (N-desmethylclozapine) is a major metabolite of clozapine formed by its demethylation. Its partial agonist activity at D2 receptors has raised interest in it as an antipsychotic in its own right. In addition, it appears to have muscarinic agonist activity, which is believed to be responsible for the observed positive effects it has on cognition. It was envisaged to be effective as an adjunct to other agents or at high doses in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia, although a recent randomized, controlled study showed that it was no more effective than placebo in patients with schizophrenia experiencing an acute psychotic episode. Olanzapine pamoate depot injection has shown comparable efficacy to oral olanzapine in several studies. However, it has provoked considerable safety concerns by its association with inadvertent intravascular injection events in numerous patients. This accidental intravascular administration of olanzapine pamoate leads to excessive sedation, confusion, dizziness and altered speech. Post-injection observation periods and postmarketing surveillance are planned following the introduction of the depot. Paliperidone palmitate is the palmitate ester of paliperidone, the major metabolite of risperidone, and is formulated as a long-acting injection for intramuscular use. Its pharmacology is comparable to risperidone, having D2 and 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist activity. Efficacy studies have shown positive results, and because paliperidone has no antagonistic activity at cholinergic receptors, it has low potential for anticholinergic adverse effects, including cognitive dysfunction. However, with higher doses, the frequency of extrapyramidal side effects and orthostatic hypotension have been shown to be greater than with placebo.