Real-time PCR method for the detection of figwort mosaic virus (FMV) to complement the FMV 34S promoter-specific PCR assay used for screening of genetically modified plants

Screening of P-35S, P-FMV, and T-NOS genetic elements in microwave-treated genetically modified cereal flours

BACKGROUND

Reliable and efficient methods for detecting genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in unprocessed and processed food will be essential for establishing an effective system for traceability all along the supply chain. It is important to understand the detection of GMOs following microwave treatment, which is a common processing method used in various food products such as flours. Therefore, this study aimed to detect the presence of Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter (P-35S), Figwort mosaic virus (FMV) promoter (P-FMV), and T-NOS (nopaline synthase terminator) genetic elements in DNA samples from untreated and microwave-treated genetically modified (GM) cereal flour samples using the qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based screening method.Please confirm if the author names are presented accurately and in the correct sequence (given name, middle name/initial, family name). Author 1 Given name: [Begüm Zeynep] Last name [Hançerlioğulları]. Also, kindly confirm the details in the metadata are correct. The author names were presented accurately and in the correct sequence (given name, middle name/initial, family name).  Author 1 Given name: [Begüm Zeynep] Last name [Hançerlioğulları]. Author 2 Given name: [Remziye] Last name [Yılmaz]. The details in the metadata are correct.

METHODS AND RESULTS

DNA was extracted from all samples, and the efficiency of the qualitative PCR screening technique was tested by the verification studies. We performed an inhibition study with plant-specific actin (ACT) gene to the effectiveness of confirming the DNA extraction method. Then, we made the confirming of the qualitative PCR system by method performance testing criteria. The high quality and quantity of the DNA extracts from untreated and microwave-treated flour samples indicated the applicability of qualitative PCR screening assays. The results showed that microwave radiation does not significantly impact the genetic element screening in flour materials.

CONCLUSION

Untreated and microwave-treated flour samples had amplifiable DNA for the simultaneous screening of three genetic elements. The qualitative screening tests conducted in this study produced dependable outcomes, thus, can be successfully used for monitoring in control laboratories.

Qualitative and Quantitative Real-Time PCR Methods for Assessing False-Positive Rates in Genetically Modified Organisms Based on the Microbial-Infection-Linked HPT Gene

The hygromycin phosphotransferase (HPT) gene as a selective marker is normally used in screening tests as a first step in detecting and quantifying genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in seeds, food, and feed materials. Nevertheless, if researchers only focus on the HPT gene, it is difficult to distinguish genetically modified (GM) crops from microbial infection, leading to miscalculation of the rate of GM materials in a given sample set. Here, we cloned the 7259 bp sequence carrying the HPT gene from soybean sprouts using the genome walking strategy. BLAST analysis revealed that this sequence was derived from plasmids naturally occurring in microorganisms, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae or Salmonella sp. Using the reconstructed plasmid pFP-hpt, qualitative PCR and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) methods were established, and 261 bp and 156 bp products were produced. The specificity of these assays was assessed against related pFP-hpt plasmids, plant species with important agronomic traits, and GM crops containing the HPT gene. No unexpected results were observed between samples using these qualitative PCR and qPCR methods. The sensitivity of this qualitative PCR assay was determined at 20 copies, while the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of qPCR were both 5 copies per reaction. Our in-house validation indicated that the amplification efficiency, linearity, and repeatability of this qPCR assay were in line with performance requirements. Furthermore, a qualitative and quantitative duplex PCR showed high reliability for the simultaneous detection of the HPT gene in a plant sample and environmental micro-organisms harboring the HPT gene in one PCR reaction. These qualitative PCR and qPCR assays were able to differentiate between plants infected with E. coli harboring the HPT gene from GM plants, indicating that these two methods are broadly applicable for routine GMO testing.