Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran, a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in young healthy male subjects

Unlocking nature's arsenal: Nanotechnology for targeted delivery of venom toxins in cancer therapy

AIM

The aim of the present review is to shed light on the nanotechnological approaches adopted to overcome the shortcomings associated with the delivery of venom peptides which possess inherent anti-cancer properties.

BACKGROUND

Venom peptides although have been reported to demonstrate anti-cancer effects, they suffer from several disadvantages such as in vivo instability, off-target adverse effects, limited drug loading and low bioavailability. This review presents a comprehensive compilation of different classes of nanocarriers while underscoring their advantages, disadvantages and potential to carry such peptide molecules for in vivo delivery. It also discusses various nanotechnological aspects such as methods of fabrication, analytical tools to assess these nanoparticulate formulations, modulation of nanocarrier polymer properties to enhance loading capacity, stability and improve their suitability to carry toxic peptide drugs.

CONCLUSION

Nanotechnological approaches bear great potential in delivering venom peptide-based molecules as anticancer agents by enhancing their bioavailability, stability, efficacy as well as offering a spatiotemporal delivery approach. However, the challenges associated with toxicity and biocompatibility of nanocarriers must be duly addressed.

PERSPECTIVES

The everlasting quest for new breakthroughs for safer delivery of venom peptides in human subjects is fuelled by unmet clinical needs in the current landscape of chemotherapy. In addition, exhaustive efforts are required in obtaining and purifying the venom peptides followed by designing and optimizing scale up technologies.

Potential effects of anticoagulants in preclinical mice models of oral cancer: A systematic review

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common head and neck cancer. There is mounting evidence to suggest that several components of the coagulation system directly affect carcinogenesis. Our recent in vitro studies demonstrated, for the first time, that various anticoagulants have anticancer effects on OSCC. They also showed the need for the immediate translation of these experimental conditions from bench to preclinical animal models. Here, we carried out a systematic review to summarise existing evidence on murine models built around the interactions between anticoagulants and oral cancer. Only one preclinical murine study was included in our systematic review, investigating the role of heparins in tumour pathophysiology. The paucity of evidence regarding the interactions between oral squamous cell carcinoma and anticoagulants emphasises the urgency with which further preclinical research should be conducted.

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Analysis' Role in Design of Phase ⅠClinical Trials of Anticoagulant Agents: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

There remains an unmet need for better anticoagulants. The phase I clinical trial is of great significance in the development of anticoagulants, and the design is special. This system review aims to provide insights for the design of future phase I clinical trials of anticoagulants.

AREAS COVERED

We searched the database PubMed and ClinicalTrail.gov website, to collate the phase I clinical trial of anticoagulants in healthy people. The study protocol, inclusion-exclusion criteria, safety, and pharmacodynamic indexes were reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

New anticoagulants under development focused on inhibiting one or more than one serine proteases within the coagulation cascade. Agents targeting intrinsic factors are in the pipeline of the drug development. The enrollment eligibility criteria have more restrictions on laboratory tests, medical history, or medication history related to bleeding and coagulation; more precautions were taken to assess and minimize the risk of hemorrhagic events. Pharmacodynamics markers were evaluated as a surrogate marker of anticoagulation potency to guide further dose selection in drug's development. In future, the positive control study can be applied in phase I studies of new anticoagulants with appropriate pharmacodynamics markers, which can provide more favorable information on making 'go/no' decision in drug development.

From Animal Poisons and Venoms to Medicines: Achievements, Challenges and Perspectives in Drug Discovery

Animal poisons and venoms are comprised of different classes of molecules displaying wide-ranging pharmacological activities. This review aims to provide an in-depth view of toxin-based compounds from terrestrial and marine organisms used as diagnostic tools, experimental molecules to validate postulated therapeutic targets, drug libraries, prototypes for the design of drugs, cosmeceuticals, and therapeutic agents. However, making these molecules applicable requires extensive preclinical trials, with some applications also demanding clinical trials, in order to validate their molecular target, mechanism of action, effective dose, potential adverse effects, as well as other fundamental parameters. Here we go through the pitfalls for a toxin-based potential therapeutic drug to become eligible for clinical trials and marketing. The manuscript also presents an overview of the current picture for several molecules from different animal venoms and poisons (such as those from amphibians, cone snails, hymenopterans, scorpions, sea anemones, snakes, spiders, tetraodontiformes, bats, and shrews) that have been used in clinical trials. Advances and perspectives on the therapeutic potential of molecules from other underexploited animals, such as caterpillars and ticks, are also reported. The challenges faced during the lengthy and costly preclinical and clinical studies and how to overcome these hindrances are also discussed for that drug candidates going to the bedside. It covers most of the drugs developed using toxins, the molecules that have failed and those that are currently in clinical trials. The article presents a detailed overview of toxins that have been used as therapeutic agents, including their discovery, formulation, dosage, indications, main adverse effects, and pregnancy and breastfeeding prescription warnings. Toxins in diagnosis, as well as cosmeceuticals and atypical therapies (bee venom and leech therapies) are also reported. The level of cumulative and detailed information provided in this review may help pharmacists, physicians, biotechnologists, pharmacologists, and scientists interested in toxinology, drug discovery, and development of toxin-based products.

A systematic review on the effects of direct oral anticoagulants on cancer growth and metastasis in animal models

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now the first choice thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients who do not have a high risk of bleeding. In addition to the anticoagulant effects, potential anti-tumor effects of DOACs have also been studied in animal cancer models. In this study, we summarize the effects of DOACs on cancer growth and metastasis in animal models through a systematic review with a qualitative analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were systematically searched for original studies that describe animal models of cancer in which one of the experimental groups received DOAC monotherapy, and which reported quantitatively on primary tumor or metastases.

RESULTS

Nine studies - reporting a total of 19 animal experiments - met the inclusion criteria. These 19 experiments included spontaneous cancer (n = 2), carcinogenicity (n = 2), xenograft (n = 7) and syngeneic (n = 8) models, encompassing orthotopic (n = 7), subcutaneous (n = 5), intraperitoneal (n = 1) and intravenous (n = 2) injection of cancer cells and included treatments with the DOACs ximelagatran (n = 4), dabigatran etexilate (n = 6) and/or rivaroxaban (n = 11). DOAC treatment decreased tumor growth at implanted and metastatic site in 18.8% (3/16) and 20.0% (3/15) of the experiments, respectively. Conversely, DOACs increased tumor growth at implanted and metastatic site in 6.3% (1/16) and 20.0% (3/15) of the experiments, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DOAC monotherapy resulted in neoplastic changes in a rat carcinogenicity study, showed a lack of effect in mouse xenograft models, while the effect on cancer growth and metastasis in mouse syngeneic models depended on the timing of DOAC treatment and type of cancer model used.

The Future of Anticoagulation

Anticoagulant agents, such as unfractionated heparin and warfarin, have been in use for roughly 50 years. Over the past decade, injectable agents such as low-molecular-weight heparins, pentasaccharide, and direct thrombin inhibitors have been major advances in preventing and treating thrombosis. Despite these somewhat recent additions, there is still enormous potential to improve on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of these agents, as well as improve patient outcomes. There are currently a large number of anticoagulant agents (injectable and oral) that could be available for use in the next several years. Many of these new agents have unique mechanisms that may provide practitioners with anticoagulant alternatives. This review gives a detailed analysis of the anticoagulant agents that may add to our armamentarium in the management of thrombosis.

Anticoagulation in the Elderly

Oral anticoagulation has been shown to provide great benefit in preventing and treating thromboembolic disorders. The challenges of oral anticoagulation management in the elderly involve balancing the risks of bleeding versus the benefits of a life-saving treatment. Due to the complex nature of warfarin, therapy must be individualized with frequent monitoring, re-education, and adjustments based on concurrent illness and drug therapy. This review focuses on the use of warfarin, including indications, dosing recommendations, drug and dietary interactions, and reversal of anticoagulation. Methods to determine bleeding risks in this population and barriers that interfere with the prescribing of warfarin are discussed. Strategies to improve patient outcome and reduce adverse events are provided to assist clinicians in their decision-making skills. The potential advantages of anticoagulation clinics are summarized with regards to coordinating the care and minimizing the risks of anticoagulant therapy. The role of new-generation anticoagulants is also discussed as to their place in therapy.

Anticoagulant drugs: an update

Thromboembolic disorders continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality, resulting in an increased need for anticoagulant therapy. In recent years, new anticoagulant drugs have been developed at a rapid pace, prompted by the recognition of many undesirable properties of currently used agents, and by a greater knowledge of the active enzymatic sites of clotting factors. Furthermore, the structure of a thrombus is better understood, so that newer drugs can inhibit thrombin or Factor Xa not only on the surface of a thrombus, as in the case of heparin, but also the fibrin-bound thrombin or Factor Xa within the thrombus. These agents are usually small molecules synthesized on the basis of their inhibition of specific active sites in the respective coagulation factors. They possess many improved characteristics, such as greater efficacy and safety, oral administration, reliable pharmacokinetics, less need for laboratory monitoring and minimal interactions with other drugs and diet. Prominent among these are lepuridin (Refludan, Pfizer), fondaparinux (Arixtra, Sanofi-Synthelabo) and ximelagatran (Exanta, Astra Zeneca). However, these new drugs are still far from fulfilling the desired objectives. Most of them possess some but not all of the needed properties. Furthermore, many do not have specific antidotes for immediate reversal of their pharmacologic actions, and all are much more costly than conventional agents. Development of newer agents with properties closer to that of the ideal drug remains a challenge.

Ximelagatran for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and the most frequently encountered cause of embolic stroke. Vitamin K antagonists (such as warfarin) have represented the cornerstone of anticoagulation practice for the last 60 years. Although highly effective in preventing thromboembolic events among patients with atrial fibrillation, warfarin therapy is limited by a multitude of potential problems. Hence, warfarin is significantly underused in clinical practice, with only half of warfarin-treated patients actually achieving therapeutic anticoagulation in routine clinical practice. Consequently, there is an overwhelming need for an alternative oral anticoagulant for patients with atrial fibrillation that is safer, more practical and effective. Ximelagatran (Exanta, AstraZeneca) is a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor that is rapidly converted to the active compound melagatran after oral absorption. It has a low potential for drug interactions, anticoagulation monitoring is not required, and it is administered at a fixed twice-daily dose. The Stroke Prevention using the ORal Thrombin Inhibitor in patients with nonvalvular atrial Fibrillation (SPORTIF) III and V trials have together demonstrated the noninferiority of ximelagatran relative to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and embolic events in atrial fibrillation. Unfortunately, initial optimism has been tempered by serious concerns over its safety data in view of its propensity to cause elevation in liver enzymes.

Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor

The oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran (Exanta, AstraZeneca) is rapidly absorbed, is efficiently bioconverted to the active form, melagatran (AstraZeneca) and has shown efficacy and relative safety as an anticoagulant for prophylaxis and therapy of thromboembolism. Two Phase III trials, Stroke Prevention using an ORal Thrombin Inhibitor in atrial Fibrillation (SPORTIF V), have tested the hypothesis that oral ximelagatran, administered 36 mg twice daily without coagulation monitoring or dose adjustment, prevents stroke and systemic embolism at least as effectively as adjusted-dose warfarin (international normalized ratio, 2.0-3.0) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Both were randomized, multicenter trials (n > 3000 per trial) with blinded end-point assessment. The open-label SPORTIF III trial confirmed the noninferiority of ximelagatran versus warfarin. Publication of the full results from SPORTIF V is pending.

[Improvements in oral anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation]

For the last decades vitamin K antagonists have been the most effective anticoagulant treatment of atrial fibrillation. New molecules are being designed, mainly due to the great amount of disadvantages in the management of conventional anticoagulation. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban will soon be available as an alternative to warfarin/acenocumarol. All of them have demonstrated to be non-inferior to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism, with even dabigatran 150 mg bid and apixaban being superior. They have also a lower risk of bleeding, especially regarding severe/fatal and intracranial hemorrhages. This is a real revolution. The advance of these new anticoagulants will be limited only by the higher cost, and will progressively become the protagonists of oral anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

A Preliminary Assessment of the Critical Differences Between Novel Oral Anticoagulants Currently in Development

Chronic anticoagulation represents a clinical conundrum for the health care community that balances unquestionable morbidity and mortality benefits against interindividual variability, leading to drug interactions, adverse events, and thromoembolic events related to underdosing. Despite the growing data regarding the appropriate use and dosing of agents used for chronic anticoagulation, use in clinical practice remains low, thus leading to a theoretical reduction in the risk-to-benefit ratio in the clinical setting relative to that reported in the literature. Oral anticoagulants currently in development represent a heterogeneous group of compounds that are specific for the final common pathway in the coagulation cascade and show indications toward a reduced drug interaction profile, reduced interpatient variation in pharmacokinetic parameters, and morbidity and mortality benefits that might be similar to currently available treatment modalities. This review highlights the critical differences among oral anticoagulants in development and places their role in the context of the benefits and limitations of currently available anticoagulants.

A Pharmacokinetic Study of the Combined Administration of Amiodarone and Ximelagatran, an Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor

The oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran is being developed for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism. This single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study investigated the potential for the interaction of ximelagatran (36 mg every 12 hours for 8 days, measured as its active form melagatran in blood) and amiodarone (single 600-mg oral dose on day 4) in healthy male subjects (n = 26). For amiodarone + ximelagatran versus amiodarone + placebo, geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals for amiodarone AUC(0-120) and C(max) were 0.87 (0.69-1.08) and 0.86 (0.66-1.11), respectively. For desethylamiodarone, the principal metabolite of amiodarone, the corresponding ratios were 1.00 (0.89-1.12) for AUC(0-120) and 0.92 (0.77-1.09) for C(max). The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for ximelagatran + amiodarone versus ximelagatran were 1.21 (1.17-1.25) for melagatran AUC(0-12) and 1.23 (1.18-1.28) for melagatran C(max). These confidence intervals were within or only slightly outside the interval, suggesting no interaction (0.8-1.25 for the effect of amiodarone on melagatran and 0.7-1.43 for the effect of melagatran on amiodarone or desethylamiodarone). Amiodarone did not affect the concentration-effect relationship of melagatran on activated partial thromboplastin time. Ximelagatran was well tolerated when coadministered with a single dose of amiodarone. Evaluation of the safety of the combination is needed to confirm that the relatively small pharmacokinetic changes in this study are of no clinical significance.

The Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ximelagatran, an Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor, Are Unaffected by a Single Dose of Alcohol

Ximelagatran-a direct thrombin inhibitor rapidly converted to its active form, melagatran, after oral administration-is being developed for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability/safety of ximelagatran following a single 36-mg oral dose of ximelagatran +/- a single oral dose of alcohol (0.5 and 0.6 g ethanol/kg to women and men, respectively) were assessed in a randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study (n = 26). The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) and least squares mean estimates for the ratio of ximelagatran plus alcohol to ximelagatran alone for melagatran AUC (1.04 [90% CI = 1.00-1.08]) and C(max) (1.08 [90% CI = 1.03-1.14]) fell within the bounds demonstrating no interaction. Alcohol did not alter the melagatran-induced prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time or the good tolerability/safety profile of ximelagatran. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability/safety of oral ximelagatran were not affected by alcohol.

No Pharmacokinetic or Pharmacodynamic Interaction Between Digoxin and the Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Ximelagatran in Healthy Volunteers

The interaction potential of digoxin and ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor being developed for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease, was investigated in this randomized, double-blind, 2-way crossover study. On 2 separate occasions, healthy female and male volunteers (n = 16) received ximelagatran 36 mg or placebo twice daily for 8 days separated by a 4- to 14-day washout period. All volunteers received a single oral dose of digoxin 0.5 mg on day 4 of both study periods. No interaction between ximelagatran and digoxin was detected in the pharmaco-kinetic parameters (using a 90% confidence interval [CI] of least squares mean estimate ratios), including melagatran (the active form of ximelagatran) AUC(tau) and C(max) and digoxin AUC(t) and C(max). Digoxin did not alter the melagatran-induced prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time, and both drugs were well tolerated when administered in combination. In conclusion, no pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction between digoxin and ximelagatran was observed in this study.

No Pharmacokinetic or Pharmacodynamic Interaction Between Atorvastatin and the Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Ximelagatran

In this randomized, 2-way crossover study, the potential for interaction was investigated between atorvastatin and ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor. Healthy female and male volunteers (n = 16) received atorvastatin 40 mg as a single oral dose and, in a separate study period, ximelagatran 36 mg twice daily for 5 days plus a 40-mg oral dose of atorvastatin on the morning of day 4. In the 15 subjects completing the study, no pharmacokinetic interaction was detected between atorvastatin and ximelagatran for all parameters investigated, including melagatran (the active form of ximelagatran) area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration, atorvastatin acid AUC, and AUC of active 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme-A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors. Atorvastatin did not alter the melagatran-induced prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time, and both drugs were well tolerated when administered in combination. In conclusion, no pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction between atorvastatin and ximelagatran was observed in this study.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban using a computer model for blood coagulation

Rivaroxaban is an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor approved in the European Union and several other countries for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in adult patients undergoing elective hip or knee replacement surgery and is in advanced clinical development for the treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Its mechanism of action is antithrombin independent and differs from that of other anticoagulants, such as warfarin (a vitamin K antagonist), enoxaparin (an indirect thrombin/Factor Xa inhibitor) and dabigatran (a direct thrombin inhibitor). A blood coagulation computer model has been developed, based on several published models and preclinical and clinical data. Unlike previous models, the current model takes into account both the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways of the coagulation cascade, and possesses some unique features, including a blood flow component and a portfolio of drug action mechanisms. This study aimed to use the model to compare the mechanism of action of rivaroxaban with that of warfarin, and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different rivaroxaban doses with other anticoagulants included in the model. Rather than reproducing known standard clinical measurements, such as the prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time clotting tests, the anticoagulant benchmarking was based on a simulation of physiologically plausible clotting scenarios. Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban showed a favourable sensitivity for tissue factor concentration inducing clotting, and a steep concentration–effect relationship, rapidly flattening towards higher inhibitor concentrations, both suggesting a broad therapeutic window. The predicted dosing window is highly accordant with the final dose recommendation based upon extensive clinical studies.

Multinational development of a questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction with anticoagulant treatment: the 'Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire' (PACT-Q)

Background

The side effects and burden of anticoagulant treatments may contribute to poor compliance and consequently to treatment failure. A specific questionnaire is necessary to assess patients' needs and their perceptions of anticoagulant treatment.

Methods

A conceptual model of expectation and satisfaction with anticoagulant treatment was designed by an advisory board and used to guide patient (n = 31) and clinician (n = 17) interviews in French, US English and Dutch. Patients had either atrial fibrillation (AF), deep venous thrombosis (DVT), or pulmonary embolism (PE). Following interviews, three PACT-Q language versions were developed simultaneously and further pilot-tested by 19 patients. Linguistic validations were performed for additional language versions.

Results

Initial concepts were developed to cover three areas of interest: 'Treatment', 'Disease and Complications' and 'Information about disease and anticoagulant treatment'. After clinician and patient interviews, concepts were further refined into four domains and 17 concepts; test versions of the PACT-Q were then created simultaneously in three languages, each containing 27 items grouped into four domains: "Treatment Expectations" (7 items), "Convenience" (11 items), "Burden of Disease and Treatment" (2 items) and "Anticoagulant Treatment Satisfaction" (7 items). No item was deleted or added after pilot testing as patients found the PACT-Q easy to understand and appropriate in length in all languages. The PACT-Q was divided into two parts: the first part to measure the expectations and the second to measure the convenience, burden and treatment satisfaction, for evaluation prior to and after anticoagulant treatment, respectively. Eleven additional language versions were linguistically validated.

Conclusion

The PACT-Q has been rigorously developed and linguistically validated. It is available in 14 languages for use with thromboembolic patients, including AF, PE and DVT patients. Its validation and psychometric properties have been tested and are presented in a separate manuscript.

Chronic antithrombotic therapy in post-myocardial infarction patients

Because 1.1 million myocardial infarctions occur in the United States alone each year, and 450,000 of them are recurrent infarctions, which carry an inherently greater risk of death and disability than first events, the importance of secondary prevention strategies that can be implemented widely is unparalleled in health care. Antithrombotic therapies, both antiplatelet and anticoagulant, have become the mainstays of these strategies. This article covers the use of chronic antiplatelet and anticoagulation agents after myocardial infarction. It does not include the management of these patients in the acute phase.

Prediction of drug-induced liver injury in humans by using in vitro methods: the case of ximelagatran

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the possible mechanisms underlying the liver enzyme elevations seen during clinical studies of long-term treatment (>35 days) with ximelagatran, and investigate the usefulness of pre-clinical in vitro systems to predict drug-induced liver effects.

METHODS

Ximelagatran and its metabolites were tested for effects on cell viability, mitochondrial function, formation of reactive metabolites and reactive oxygen species, protein binding, and induction of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) gene expression or nuclear orphan receptors. Experimental systems included fresh and cryopreserved hepatocytes, human hepatoma cell lines (HepG2 and HuH-7) and subcellular human liver fractions.

RESULTS

Loss of cell viability was only seen in HepG2 cells at ximelagatran concentrations 100 microM and in cryopreserved human hepatocytes at 300 microM, while HuH-7 cells were not affected by 24 h exposure at up to 300 microM ximelagatran. Calcium homeostasis was not affected in HepG2 cells exposed to ximelagatran up to 300 microM for 15 min. There was no evidence for the formation of reactive metabolites when cell systems were exposed to ximelagatran. ALT and AST expression in human hepatoma cell lines were also unchanged by ximelagatran. Mitochondrial functions such as respiration, opening of the transition pore, mitochondrial membrane depolarization and beta-oxidation were not affected by ximelagatran or its metabolites.

CONCLUSION

Ximelagatran at concentrations considerably higher than that found in plasma following therapeutic dosing had little or no effect on cellular functions studied in vitro. The in vitro studies therefore did not elucidate the mechanism by which ximelagatran induces liver effects in humans, possibly because of limitations in the experimental systems not reflecting characteristics of the human hepatocyte, restricted exposure time, or because the primary mechanism for the observed clinical liver effects is not on the parenchymal liver cell.

Determination of ximelagatran, melagatran and two intermediary metabolites in plasma by mixed-mode solid phase extraction and LC–MS/MS

An analytical method was developed for the determination of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, its active metabolite melagatran, and the two intermediate metabolites, OH-melagatran and ethyl-melagatran in human plasma. Extraction of plasma was carried out on a mixed mode bonded sorbent material (C8/SO(3)(-)). All four analytes, including their isotope-labelled internal standards, were eluted at high ionic strength with a mixture of 50% methanol and 50% buffer (0.25 M ammonium acetate and 0.05 M formic acid, pH 5.3) with an extraction recovery above 80%. The extracts were demonstrated to be clean in terms of a low concentration of albumin and lysoPC. The sample extraction was fully automated and performed in 96-well plates using a Tecan Genesis pipetting robot. Analysis of the extracts were performed with liquid chromatography followed by positive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. The low organic content and the low pH of the extracts allowed for, after dilution 1:3 with buffer, direct injection onto the LC-column. The four analytes were separated on a C18 analytical LC-column using gradient elution with the acetonitrile concentration varying from 10 to 30% (v/v) and the ammonium acetate and acetic acid concentration kept constant at 10 and 5 mmol/L, respectively, at a flow rate of 0.75 mL/min. Linearity was achieved over the calibrated range 0.010-4.0 micromol/L with accuracy and relative standard deviation in the range 96.9-101.2% and 6.6-17.1%, respectively at LLOQ, and in the range 94.7-102.6% and 2.7-6.8%, respectively at concentrations above 3 x LLOQ. The method replaces a manual method, and displays the advantages of having a fully automated sample clean-up, no evaporation/reconstitution step, high recovery, and complete LC-separation of all four analytes.

Ximelagatran: direct thrombin inhibitor

Warfarin sodium is an effective oral anticoagulant drug. However, warfarin has a narrow therapeutic window with significant risks of hemorrhage at therapeutic concentrations. Dosing is difficult and requires frequent monitoring. New oral anticoagulant agents are required to improve current anticoagulant therapy. Furthermore, while warfarin is effective in venous disease, it does not provide more than 60% risk reduction compared with placebo in venous thrombosis prophylaxis and considerably lower risk reduction in terms of arterial thrombosis. Ximelagatran is an oral pro-drug of melagatran, a synthetic small peptidomimetic with direct thrombin inhibitory actions and anticoagulant activity. As an oral agent, ximelagatran has a number of desirable properties including a rapid onset of action, fixed dosing, stable absorption, apparent low potential for medication interactions, and no requirement for monitoring of drug levels or dose adjustment. It has a short plasma elimination half-life of about 4 hours in cases of unexpected hemorrhage or need for reversal. Its main toxicity relates to the development of abnormal liver biochemistry and/or liver dysfunction with “long-term” use of the drug. This usually occurs within the first 6 months of commencing therapy, with a small percentage of patients developing jaundice. The biochemical abnormality usually resolves despite continuation of the drug. The cause of this toxicity remains unknown. Clinical studies to date have shown that ximelagatran is noninferior to warfarin in stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, noninferior to standard therapy as acute and extended therapy of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and superior to warfarin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism post-major orthopedic surgery. It has also been shown to be more effective than aspirin alone for prevention of recurrent major cardiovascular events in patients with recent myocardial infarction.

Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly

Atrial fibrillation is a risk factor for stroke, particularly among elderly patients. Multiple trials have established that antithrombotic therapy decreases stroke risk. Aspirin is associated with a relative risk reduction of about 21% and adjusted-dose warfarin (international normalized ratio 2.0-3.0) is associated with a relative risk reduction of about 68%. Warfarin is more effective than aspirin but is used less often than indicated because of hemorrhagic risk and the inconvenience of coagulation monitoring. The oral direct thrombin ximelagatran has been investigated for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in two large clinical trials. The results suggest efficacy in a fixed dose compared with well controlled warfarin. Although anticoagulation intensity was not monitored or regulated during treatment with ximelagatran, it was associated with less bleeding than warfarin. Other antithrombotic agents are under development as alternatives to warfarin, but sufficient data are not yet available to justify their clinical use in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Hemostatic effect of activated factor VII without promotion of thrombus growth in melagatran-anticoagulated primates

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacological enhancement of coagulation using activated prothrombin complex concentrate (APCC) or activated factor VII (FVIIa) might be useful hemostatic approaches to bleeding emergencies during anticoagulant therapy. However, any such intervention should not increase thrombotic risk. We therefore investigated their hemostatic and prothrombotic potential during propagation of large arterial-type thrombin in anticoagulated baboons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

High dose melagatran, a competitive inhibitor of thrombin (0.6 mg/kg/h), or inactivated FVIIa (FVIIai), a competitive inhibitor of FVIIa (2 mg/kg) were used for anticoagulation. APCC or FVIIa were administered to melagatran-anticoagulated animals only. Primary hemostasis was assessed as template bleeding time (BT). Thrombus formation was quantified as fibrin deposition (FD) and platelet deposition (PLD) in synthetic vascular grafts that were deployed for 40 min into arteriovenous shunts.

RESULTS

Melagatran (n=11) prolonged BT to 279% (95% CI +/-140%; P<0.019), reduced FD to 33% [+/-8%; P<0.001]; and PLD to 39% [+/-11%; P<0.001] of untreated controls. FVIIai (n=3) prolonged BT (222% [+/-51%; P<0.010]) without inhibiting thrombus propagation. APCC (n=10) reduced the antithrombotic effect of melagatran (FD 52% [+/-9%; P<0.002], PLD 61% [+/-17%; P=0.028] versus melagatran alone) at a dose (250 U/kg) that had no effect on the BT (327% [+/-150%; P=0.607]. Meanwhile, FVIIa (n=12) normalized the BT to 115% (+/-32%; P<0.05) at a dose (270 microg/kg) that was not yet prothrombotic (FD 26% [+/-4%; P<0.001], PLD 39% [+/-9%; P=0.970]).

CONCLUSION

Administration of FVIIa during antithrombotic treatment with direct thrombin inhibitors might support hemostasis before promoting the intraluminal expansion of thrombi.

The challenges of new drugs benefits and risks analysis: Lessons from the ximelagatran FDA Cardiovascular Advisory Committee

Ximelagatran is a new oral anticoagulant that acts by direct and reversible inhibition of thrombin and has the potential to replace warfarin. In 2004, the FDA Cardiovascular and Renal drug Advisory Committee (CRAC) reviewed the ximelagatran clinical program. Three indications were proposed: the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery (TKR), the prevention of stroke and other thromboembolic complications associated with atrial fibrillation (AF), and the long-term secondary prevention of VTE after standard treatment of an episode of acute VTE. The database consisted of a total of 30,698 subjects and included five phase III pivotal studies. During the advisory panel debate, widely divergent analyses of the benefits and risks of ximelagatran were presented. Ximelagatran hepatic toxicity was a key feature leading the CRAC to conclude that the benefit risk ratio of ximelagtran was unfavorable for the three proposed indications. Some design issues also undermined the strength of efficacy data. This paper reviews the benefits and risks of ximelagatran and analyzes the reasons leading to conflicting conclusions among various experts. The aim of this review is to facilitate the interpretation of benefits and risks associated with a new drug product and to improve future clinical drug developments.

The status of new anticoagulants

Currently available anticoagulants include heparin, low-molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux and warfarin. Despite advances with low-molecular weight heparin and fondaparinux, the currently available agents have limitations that have provided the impetus for the development of new drugs for prevention and treatment of both venous and arterial thromboembolism. Novel anticoagulants targeting specific steps in coagulation are in various stages of development. This paper reviews the pharmacology of these new agents and describes the results of clinical trials with new anticoagulants in more advanced stages of clinical testing.

INFLUENCE OF ERYTHROMYCIN ON THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF XIMELAGATRAN MAY INVOLVE INHIBITION OF P-GLYCOPROTEIN-MEDIATED EXCRETION

A pharmacokinetic interaction between erythromycin and ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, was demonstrated in this study in healthy volunteers. To investigate possible interaction mechanisms, the effects of erythromycin on active transport mediated by P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in vitro in Caco-2 and P-gp-over-expressing Madin-Darby canine kidney-human multidrug resistance-1 cell preparations and on biliary excretion of melagatran in rats were studied. In healthy volunteers (seven males and nine females; mean age 24 years) receiving a single dose of ximelagatran 36 mg on day 1, erythromycin 500 mg t.i.d. on days 2 to 5, and a single dose of ximelagatran 36 mg plus erythromycin 500 mg on day 6, the least-squares mean estimates (90% confidence intervals) for the ratio of ximelagatran with erythromycin to ximelagatran given alone were 1.82 (1.64-2.01) for the area under the concentration-time curve and 1.74 (1.52-2.00) for the maximum plasma concentration of melagatran, the active form of ximelagatran. Neither the slope nor the intercept of the melagatran plasma concentration-effect relationship for activated partial thromboplastin time statistically significantly differed as a function of whether or not erythromycin was administered with ximelagatran. Ximelagatran was well tolerated regardless of whether it was administered with erythromycin. Erythromycin inhibited P-gp-mediated transport of both ximelagatran and melagatran in vitro and decreased the biliary excretion of melagatran in the rat. These results indicate that the mechanism of the pharmacokinetic interaction between oral ximelagatran and erythromycin may involve inhibition of transport proteins, possibly P-gp, resulting in decreased melagatran biliary excretion and increased bioavailability of melagatran.

New Anticoagulant Agents: Direct Thrombin Inhibitors

Decades of research have been devoted to developing effective, safe, and convenient anticoagulant agents. In recent years, much emphasis has been placed on the development of direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) that offer benefits over agents like heparin and warfarin including the inhibition of both circulating and clot-bound thrombin; a more predictable anticoagulant response, because they do not bind to plasma proteins and are not neutralized by platelet factor 4; lack of required cofactors, such as antithrombin or heparin cofactor II; inhibiting thrombin-induced platelet aggregation; and absence of induction of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. Various injectable DTIs are currently available and used for many indications. In addition, research is now focusing on oral DTIs that seem promising and offer various advantages, such as oral administration, predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, a broad therapeutic window, no routine monitoring, no significant drug interactions, and fixed-dose administration.

Chronic Antithrombotic Therapy in Post–Myocardial Infarction Patients

Recent advances in the acute treatment of myocardial infarction (MI) have allowed more to survive the initial event in coronary artery disease. Increasing importance has been placed on secondary-prevention strategies, with more attention directed toward an optimal therapeutic regimen for post-MI patients. When it comes to the subpopulation of the elderly who have had an MI, however, current practice relies less on population-specific evidence and more on extrapolation of current data. This article reviews the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease and MI, and highlights recent major trials that have explored antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications in the chronic treatment of the post-MI population. Special consideration is given to the geriatric community and its unique challenge regarding chronic antithrombotic therapy.

Incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism of patients after termination of treatment with ximelagatran

OBJECTIVE

Recurrent thromboembolic events may occur after termination of anticoagulant therapy for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) using oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran.

METHODS

Patients with VTE recruited at the German study centres were followed-up for an additional 18 months, treated initially with 2x36 mg ximelagatran daily or with enoxaparin/warfarin over 6 months (THRIVE Treatment study) and 2x24 mg ximelagatran daily or placebo over 18 months (THRIVE III study). Recurrent VTE and the combined outcome events consisting of recurrent VTE, other thrombotic complication, major bleeding and mortality were analysed.

RESULTS

In the THRIVE Treatment study, no patient suffered from a recurrent VTE, but 1 patient randomised to enoxaparin/warfarin experienced major bleeding. During follow-up, 4/32 and 3/32 patients initially randomised to ximelagatran and enoxaparin/warfarin developed recurrent VTE (p=0.7024). No major bleed occurred. One patient in each group died. The incidences of the combined outcome events were not different (p=0.9326). In the THRIVE III study, 0/9 versus 5/14 patients randomised to ximelagatran and placebo developed recurrent VTE including 1 fatal pulmonary embolism (p=0.0501). During follow-up, 3/9 and no patients initially randomised to ximelagatran and placebo developed recurrent VTE. One and 3 other outcome events occurred in patients initially randomised to ximelagatran or placebo. During follow-up, recurrent VTE (p=0.6893) and combined outcome events (p=0.3642) were not different between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of the follow-up studies suggest that thromboembolic events may re-occur in patients with acute VTE after termination of treatment with both vitamin K-antagonists and ximelagatran.

Stroke prevention using the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Pooled analysis from the SPORTIF III and V studies

BACKGROUND

To show results of a prespecified pooled analysis of the studies SPORTIF III (open-label) and SPORTIF V (double-blind), to assess the homogeneity of the results and to explore subgroup analyses and adverse events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

7,329 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and >or=1 additional stroke risk factor were randomized to warfarin (international normalized ratio 2.0-3.0) or ximelagatran (36 mg twice daily). Over 11,346 patient-years (mean 18.5 months/patient), 184 patients developed primary events of stroke and systemic embolism (ximelagatran 1.62 vs. warfarin 1.65%/year; p = 0.94). Heterogeneity between trials with respect to the primary event rate (study-by-treatment interaction p = 0.026) was found. This could not be explained statistically by baseline patient characteristics or by treatment (except perhaps by the better anticoagulation with warfarin in SPORTIF V) and was not evident for secondary end-points. There was no conclusive difference in major bleeding rates (ximelagatran 1.88 vs. warfarin 2.46%/year; p = 0.054), but combined minor plus major bleeding was lower with ximelagatran (31.7 vs. 38.7%/year; p < 0.0001). Elevation of liver enzymes occurred more frequently in patients taking ximelagatran (6.1% vs. warfarin 0.8%; p < 0.0001) and was reversible except in rare cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Fixed-dose oral ximelagatran without coagulation monitoring prevented stroke and systemic embolism as effectively as warfarin in patients with AF. Differences in the results of the two trials might relate to consistency of warfarin anticoagulation, different degree of blinding in the two trials, other concomitant therapies or chance. Further investigation is required to explore the long-term safety profile of ximelagatran.

Comparable Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Melagatran in Japanese and Caucasian Volunteers after Oral Administration of the Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Ximelagatran

OBJECTIVES

Two studies were conducted to elucidate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran after administration of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran to Caucasian and Japanese volunteers.

METHODS

In study 1, with a single-blind, parallel-group design, young Japanese and Caucasian male volunteers were randomised to receive four single escalating oral doses of ximelagatran (12, 24, 36 and 60mg on separate days; n = 27 per ethnic group) or placebo (n = 6 per ethnic group). In study 2, with an open-label design, elderly Japanese male volunteers (n = 12) received three single escalating oral doses of ximelagatran (12, 24 and 36mg on separate days).

RESULTS

Regardless of the ethnicity or age of the volunteers, ximelagatran given in single oral doses was rapidly absorbed and bioconverted to melagatran, and the melagatran area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (C(max)) increased in proportion with the ximelagatran dose, with only small deviations from absolute linearity. Higher melagatran AUC and C(max) were observed in young Japanese volunteers compared with young Caucasian volunteers, and in elderly Japanese volunteers compared with young Japanese volunteers. These results appear to be attributed to weight- and age-related decreases in renal elimination of melagatran rather than to absorption of ximelagatran and formation of melagatran. The pattern of metabolites in plasma and urine was comparable between young Japanese and Caucasian volunteers, and between young and elderly Japanese volunteers. The melagatran plasma concentration-activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT, an ex vivo coagulation time measurement used to demonstrate inhibition of thrombin) relationship did not differ significantly between young Japanese and Caucasian volunteers or between young and elderly Japanese volunteers.

CONCLUSIONS

Ethnicity does not affect the absorption of ximelagatran or the formation of melagatran or the melagatran plasma concentration-aPTT relationship. The elimination of melagatran is correlated with renal function.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Melagatran, the Active Form of the Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Ximelagatran, in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Receiving Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy

BACKGROUND

Ximelagatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor for the prevention of thromboembolic disease. After oral administration, ximelagatran is rapidly absorbed and bioconverted to its active form, melagatran.

OBJECTIVE

To characterise the pharmacokinetics of melagatran in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) receiving long-term treatment for prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events.

METHODS

A population pharmacokinetic model was developed based on data from three phase II studies (1177 plasma concentration observations in 167 patients, treated for up to 18 months) and confirmed by including data from two phase III studies (8702 plasma concentration observations in 3188 patients, treated for up to 24 months). The impact of individualised dosing on pharmacokinetic variability was evaluated by simulations of melagatran concentrations based on the pharmacokinetic model.

RESULTS

Melagatran pharmacokinetics were consistent across the studied doses and duration of treatment, and were described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Clearance of melagatran was correlated to creatinine clearance, which was the most important predictor of melagatran exposure (explained 54% of interpatient variance in clearance). Total variability (coefficient of variation) in exposure was 45%; intraindividual variability in exposure was 23%. Concomitant medication with the most common long-term used drugs in the study population had no relevant influence on melagatran pharmacokinetics. Simulations suggested that dose adjustment based on renal function or trough plasma concentration had a minor effect on overall pharmacokinetic variability and the number of patients with high melagatran exposure.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetics of melagatran in NVAF patients were predictable, and consistent with results from previously studied patient populations. Dose individualisation was predicted to have a low impact on pharmacokinetic variability, supporting the use of a fixed-dose regimen of ximelagatran for long-term anticoagulant therapy in the majority of NVAF patients.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Ximelagatran in Young Healthy Japanese Men

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran, which is rapidly bioconverted to its active form melagatran after oral administration, is being developed for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism. This study assessed the effects of food and repeated dosing on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran to young healthy Japanese males.

METHODS

In part one of the two-part study, volunteers (n = 24) were randomised to receive in a crossover fashion a single oral dose of ximelagatran 48mg with or without breakfast on 2 days separated by a 2- to 7-day washout period. In the second part of the study, all volunteers received oral doses of ximelagatran 48mg every 12 hours for 5 days followed by a single dose on the morning of day 6.

RESULTS

The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), peak plasma concentration (C(max)) and urinary excretion of melagatran did not differ as a function of whether ximelagatran was taken with or without food. The relationship between the melagatran plasma concentration and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT, which reflects the thrombin inhibitory effect of melagatran) was also independent of concomitant food intake. During repeated dosing, steady-state plasma concentrations of melagatran were achieved after the second dose of ximelagatran on day 1 and remained stable through the rest of the dosing period. The melagatran AUC and C(max) increased slightly (by 18% and 22%, respectively) on day 6 compared with day 1. The interindividual variability in the melagatran AUC and C(max) remained low, as reflected by coefficients of variation of <20% on both day 1 and day 6. The amount of melagatran excreted in urine remained stable over the 6 days of repeated dosing.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran were not affected by food or repeated dosing in healthy Japanese volunteers.

Long-term treatment with ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, persistently reduces the coagulation activity after a myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

In the ESTEEM study, patients with a recent myocardial infarction were treated with aspirin and randomized to one of four doses (24-60 mg b.i.d) of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran or placebo for 6 months. Ximelagatran and aspirin reduced the risk of recurrent ischemic events compared with aspirin alone. In the present substudy we evaluated the different doses of ximelagatran on pharmacokinetics as measured by plasma concentration of the active compound melagatran and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and pharmacodynamics as related by markers for coagulation activity, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) and D-dimer.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Plasma samples from 518 patients were collected before, during and after the treatment period. There was a linear dose-concentration relation at peak and trough and a linear relation between concentration and APTT (P < 0.001). F1 + 2 and D-dimer were decreased by 25% and 52% at 1 week (P < 0.001) in the ximelagatran groups compared with the placebo group and the reductions were maintained during the 6 months treatment. There were no differences detected in F1 + 2 or D-dimer levels between the different ximelagatran dosages. There was no correlation between the melagatran concentration and the change in F1 + 2 and D-dimer levels. After cessation of ximelagatran F1 + 2 and D-dimer levels returned to the initial levels.

CONCLUSION

The dose of ximelagatran and APTT are linearly related to the plasma concentration of melagatran. Ximelagatran induces a sustained and stable reduction of thrombin generation and fibrin turnover without any relation to dose above 24 mg b.i.d. These properties indicate that long-term treatment with a low dose of ximelagatran may provide valuable depression of coagulation activity in aspirin treated post myocardial infarction patients.

Long-Term Anticoagulation: The Prospects for Alternatives to Warfarin

Many advances have occurred in the pharmacological treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) since the vitamin K antagonists (eg, warfarin) and unfractionated heparin were introduced over 60 years ago, but warfarin and other coumarin derivatives remain the only orally administered anticoagulants available for long-term prevention and treatment of VTE. The coumarin derivatives are not convenient to use, as they have a narrow therapeutic index and require frequent laboratory monitoring and dosage adjustment. The low-molecular-weight heparins, and the indirect factor Xa inhibitor, fondaparinux, offer improvements, but both agents still need to be administered subcutaneously. A number of new, orally available, direct inhibitors of factor Xa or thrombin are in development and offer ease of use and predictability of dosing so that monitoring is not required. These agents hold great promise as new anticoagulants that might provide greater efficacy and safety, and because of these attributes, might lead to greater use of anticoagulant therapy for patients not currently treated.

Ximelagatran: a clinical perspective

Ximelagatran is a novel oral anticoagulant belonging to a class of drugs known as direct thrombin inhibitors. Numerous recent large-scale, randomised controlled clinical trials have given the drug a large clinical platform. These include data on the thromboprophylaxis of venous thromboembolism following major orthopaedic surgery and knee arthroscopy, as well as in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and prevention of stroke with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. One phase II study has also shown the efficacy and safety of ximelagatran in secondary prevention post-myocardial infarction. Unfortunately, approximately 6% of patients develop usually self-limiting derangement of liver dysfunction, and frequent monitoring of liver function is likely to be recommended for the first 6 months of treatment. Unlike the vitamin K antagonists, ximelagatran has a wide therapeutic interval with few food, alcohol or drug interactions, and it does not require anticoagulant monitoring. The aim of this overview is to review the clinical trials pertaining to this new drug, which is the first new oral anticoagulant for over 60 years, and one that is likely to influence our management of thrombosis-related disorders.

Ximelagatran: An orally active direct thrombin inhibitor

PURPOSE

The chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, dosage and administration, contraindications, and adverse effects of ximelagatran are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Ximelagatran is the first orally active direct thrombin inhibitor to be tested in Phase III clinical trials. After oral administration, ximelagatran is rapidly converted to its active metabolite, melagatran. Melagatran (after oral ximelagatran administration) predictably inhibits thrombin function without need for routine anticoagulation monitoring. Melagatran effectively inhibits both free and clot-bound thrombin-a potential pharmacodynamic advantage over heparin products. Melagatran has a half-life of 2.4-4.6 hours, necessitating twice-daily administration. Melagatran is primarily eliminated by the kidneys and has not been studied clinically in patients with severe renal failure. Ximelagatran has undergone 10 Phase III trials (6 for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism [VTE] due to orthopedic surgery, 1 for initial treatment of VTE, 1 for long-term prevention of VTE recurrence, and 2 for stroke prophylaxis due to atrial fibrillation). Results were generally positive. AstraZeneca applied in December 2003 for marketing approval of ximelagatran for prevention of VTE after total knee replacement surgery, long-term prevention of VTE recurrence after standard therapy, and stroke prevention due to atrial fibrillation. FDA denied approval of ximelagatran for all indications, mainly because of increased rates of coronary artery disease events in ximelagatran recipients in some studies and the possibility of hepatic failure when the medication is used for long-term therapy.

CONCLUSION

Ximelagatran has shown promise as a possible alternative to warfarin and other anticoagulants but will require further study to ensure its safety.

Direct thrombin inhibitors: pharmacology and clinical relevance

Although heparin has been a cornerstone of treatment for the prevention of thrombosis, it is limited by its adverse effects and unpredictable bioavailability. Direct thrombin inhibitors are a novel class of drugs that have been developed as an effective alternative mode of anticoagulation in patients who suffer from heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia, and for the management of thromboembolic disorders and acute coronary syndromes. The main disadvantages of the direct thrombin inhibitors are the lack of an antidote or readily available clinical monitoring. The mechanism of action, the properties of direct thrombin inhibitors and their potential to replace currently available anticoagulants are reviewed.

The effects of ximelagatran and warfarin on the prophylaxis of a caval vein thrombosis and bleeding in the anaesthetized rat

The antithrombotic and bleeding properties of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran and of warfarin were investigated in an experimental venous thrombosis and bleeding model in anaesthetized rats. Rats were randomized to receive ximelagatran (1-20 micromol/kg), warfarin (0.20-0.82 micromol/kg), or vehicle (tap water) once daily orally for 4 days before surgery. Thrombosis was induced by partial stenosis and application of ferric chloride to the wall of the abdominal vena cava under anaesthesia. Sixty minutes after thrombus induction, rats were sacrificed, thrombi harvested, and their fresh weight determined. Bleeding was determined as haemoglobin in fluid collected from the abdominal cavity. Blood samples were taken before thrombus induction and sacrifice for determination of coagulation parameters and plasma concentrations of melagatran, the active form of ximelagatran. Ximelagatran and warfarin dose-dependently reduced thrombus formation. The highest doses of ximelagatran and warfarin almost completely prevented thrombus formation; however, the increase in bleeding (versus vehicle) was significantly lower with the highest dose of ximelagatran than with the highest dose of warfarin. The oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran is thus as at least as effective as warfarin in the prevention of thrombus formation in this animal model, but with a wider separation between antithrombotic effects and bleeding.

Anaesthesia and new antithrombotic drugs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

New anticoagulant drugs are introduced by the pharmaceutical industry on a regular basis. Anaesthesiologists are not always very familiar with these drugs although their use may augment perioperative bleeding and increase the likelihood of a compressing spinal haematoma when combined with epidural or spinal anaesthetic techniques. This review discusses the latest of these new anticoagulants and their consequences for anaesthesiological practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Durning the last few years, selective factor Xa inhibitors, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists and direct thrombin inhibitors have been introduced into clinical practice. These drugs are typically more reliable and efficacious, have a lower incidence of side effects, are easier to use and will not need routine monitoring of their anticoagulant effects. In addition, their superior efficacy often implies a more profound anticoagulant action while reversing agents are mostly lacking and clinical experience is limited.

SUMMARY

There is currently not enough information available to make any firm statements about the safety of combining regional anaesthesia and the new anticoagulant agents. Until such information becomes available, knowledge of the pharmacological profile of these drugs in terms of elimination half-life, the potential for thrombocytopenia and the availability of antagonizing drugs will help us to decide whether or not a major regional anaesthetic technique will be feasible in the individual patient treated with these new compounds.

Prevention of clot formation during haemodialysis using the direct thrombin inhibitor melagatran in patients with chronic uraemia

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the feasibility of replacing intravenous (i.v.) dalteparin with the direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) melagatran administered via dialysis fluid in patients undergoing haemodialysis, and also examined the pharmacokinetics of melagatran with and without dialysis.

METHODS

During two 4 h haemodialysis sessions, 10 adult patients were administered i.v. dalteparin. During two subsequent sessions, melagatran was administered as an i.v. bolus before dialysis, and in the dialysis fluid. The pharmacokinetics of melagatran administered as a bolus before dialysis, and of i.v. melagatran during a dialysis-free day, were studied. Dialysis performances were evaluated from clinical criteria including clot formation in the dialyzer and bloodlines, pre-post dialyzer pressures and iohexol clearance. Anticoagulant efficacy was evaluated from dialysis success.

RESULTS

All dialysis sessions were successful, with no apparent difference in clot formation between the two treatments. Median iohexol clearance was similar with dalteparin (99-103 ml/min) and melagatran in the dialysis fluid (98-100 ml/min). There was no difference in pre- and post-dialyzer bloodline pressures between the two treatments. During dialysis sessions with melagatran in dialysis fluid, melagatran concentrations in plasma rapidly equilibrated to approximately 70% of those in dialysis fluid. While the clearance of melagatran was low in patients with renal failure (mean+/-SD, 0.93+/-0.36 l/h), haemodialysis provided efficient clearance of melagatran (7.20+/-0.76 l/h). Melagatran clearance by dialysis (104+/-10 ml/min) was comparable to iohexol clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

The DTI melagatran administered via dialysis fluid may provide sufficient anticoagulation for haemodialysis. Melagatran is rapidly cleared from plasma by haemodialysis, suggesting that this method may be used to decrease drug levels in patients with renal impairment.