Pharmacokinetic differences between the enantiomers of lansoprazole and its metabolite, 5-hydroxylansoprazole, in relation to CYP2C19 genotypes

Chiral separation in the class of proton pump inhibitors by chromatographic and electromigration techniques: An overview

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are benzimidazole-derivative chiral sulfoxides, frequently used in the treatment of gastric hyperacidity-related disorders. Due to their stereoselective metabolism, the eutomeric forms of PPIs can present a more advantageous pharmacokinetic profile by comparison with the distomers or racemates. Moreover, two representatives of the class are used in therapy both as racemates and as pure enantiomers (esomeprazole, dexlansoprazole). A relatively large number of enantioseparation methods employed for the stereoselective determination of PPIs from pharmaceutical, biological, and environmental matrices were published in the past three decades. The purpose of the current overview is to provide a systematic survey of the available chiral separation methods published since the introduction of PPIs in the therapy up to the present. Analytical and bioanalytical methods using different chromatographic and electromigration techniques reported for the enantioseparation of omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, ilaprazole, and tenatoprazole are included. The analytical conditions of the presented methods are summarized in three comprehensive tables, while a critical discussion of the applied techniques, possible mechanism of enantiorecognition, and future perspectives on the topic are also presented.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Dexlansoprazole Infusion Injection Compared with Lansoprazole in Healthy Chinese Adults

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

This study was performed in healthy Chinese subjects to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of a novel injection formulation of dexlansoprazole in the context of single and multiple administration, compared with the original lansoprazole injection.

METHODS

Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy volunteers were recruited, and 70 participants were enrolled into five dosing groups (seven males and seven females in each group), including 15 mg once daily (qd), 15 mg every 12 h (q12h), 30 mg qd and 30 mg q12h of dexlansoprazole treatment for 5 days, as well as 30 mg q12h of lansoprazole treatment for 5 days. Blood samples were collected at scheduled time spots postdose on day 1 (first dose) and day 5 (last dose). Twenty-four-hour intragastric pH was continuously monitored on day 0 (baseline) and days 1 and 5. Dexlansoprazole and S-lansoprazole in human plasma were determined by validated chiral liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by a non-compartmental method using Phoenix WinNonlin software. Safety assessment included changes in vital signs and laboratory tests, physical examination findings, and incidence or reports of adverse events.

RESULTS

The half-life (t_½) and clearance (CL) of dexlansoprazole were 1.76-2.06 h and 4.52-5.40 L/h, respectively, while the t_½ and CL of S-lansoprazole were 0.87-1.02 h and 34.66-35.98 L/h, respectively. No drug accumulation after repeated administration was noted. Administration of lansoprazole 30 mg resulted in higher area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUC_t) of dexlansoprazole than that of dexlansoprazole 15 mg (p = 0.026). Zero to 24 h after q12h multiple dosing, median and mean intragastric pH, percentage of time with the intragastric pH above 4.0 [TpH ≥ 4.0(%)] and percentage of time with the intragastric pH above 6.0 [TpH ≥ 6.0(%)] in the dexlansoprazole 15 mg q12h group were 6.07 ± 0.61, 5.70 ± 0.76, 83.58 ± 12.34, and 53.70 ± 17.06, respectively, which was similar to the lansoprazole 30 mg q12h group, i.e. 6.15 ± 0.62, 5.88 ± 0.67, 87.26 ± 12.08 and 57.00 ± 16.35, respectively. A weak positive correlation between dexlansoprazole AUC_t and baseline-adjusted TpH ≥ 4.0(%) over 0-24 h was observed, with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.437 (p = 0.029), while no correlation was observed between AUC_t and baseline-adjusted TpH ≥ 6.0(%) over 0-24 h.

CONCLUSION

Every 12 h intravenous dosing of dexlansoprazole up to 30 mg for 5 days was safe and well-tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. Every 12 h dosing of dexlansoprazole 15 mg has a comparable effect of gastric acid inhibition as lansoprazole 30 mg q12h.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03120273.

Development of Dexlansoprazole Delayed-Release Capsules, a Dual Delayed-Release Proton Pump Inhibitor

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for treating acid-related disorders. For an "ideal PPI," achieving maximal absorption and sustaining pharmacodynamic effects through the 24-h dosing cycle are critical features. Dexlansoprazole offers a relevant case study on how an improved PPI was developed capitalizing on the rational optimization of a precursor molecule-in this case, using lansoprazole as a starting point, leveraging its chemical properties on pharmacokinetics, and exploring optimized formulations. Dexlansoprazole is the R(+)-enantiomer of lansoprazole and shows stereoselective differences in absorption and metabolism compared with the racemic mixture of lansoprazole. The formulation was further refined to use pulsate-type granules with enteric coating to withstand acidic gastric conditions, while allowing prolonged absorption in the proximal and distal small intestine. As a result, the dual delayed-release formulation of dexlansoprazole has a plasma concentration-time profile characterized by 2 distinct peaks, leading to an extended duration of therapeutic plasma drug concentrations compared with the conventional delayed-release lansoprazole formulation. The dual delayed-release formulation maintains plasma drug concentrations longer than the lansoprazole delayed-release formulation at all doses.

Intragastric pH effect of 20mg of levo-pantoprazole versus 40mg of racemic pantoprazole the first seven days of treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

INTRODUCTION/AIM

Levo-pantoprazole, the S-enantiomer of pantoprazole, is a proton pump inhibitor that has been shown in animal studies to be faster and stronger than its racemic formulation. There are no studies on humans and therefore our aim was to evaluate the effects of levo-pantoprazole versus racemic pantoprazole on intragastric pH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized controlled study was conducted on patients with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease that were given 20mg of levo-pantoprazole (n = 15) versus 40mg of racemic pantoprazole (n = 15) for 7 days. Baseline and end-of-treatment symptom evaluation and intragastric pH measurement were carried out.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the groups in the baseline evaluations. From 40 to 115min after the first dose of levo-pantoprazole, the mean intragastric pH was higher, compared with that of racemic pantoprazole (p < 0.05). After one week, levo-pantoprazole and racemic pantoprazole significantly reduced intragastric acid production and its esophageal exposure (p < 0.05). Even though there was no statistically significant difference, a larger number of patients that received levo-pantoprazole stated that their heartburn improved within the first 3 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The S-enantiomer of pantoprazole (levo-pantoprazole) had a faster and stronger effect with respect to acid suppression, compared with its racemic formulation. Although the effect on symptoms was faster with levo-pantoprazole, occurring within the first days of treatment, it was equivalent to that of the racemate at one week of treatment.

Enantioselective Drug Recognition by Drug Transporters

Drug transporters mediate the absorption, tissue distribution, and excretion of drugs. The cDNAs of P-glycoprotein, multidrug resistance proteins (MRPs/ABCC), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2), peptide transporters (PEPTs/SLC15), proton-coupled folate transporters (PCFT/SLC46A1), organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs/SLCO), organic anion transporters (OATs/SLC22), organic cation transporters (OCTs/SLC22), and multidrug and toxin extrusions (MATEs/SLC47) have been isolated, and their functions have been elucidated. Enantioselectivity has been demonstrated in the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of drugs, and is important for elucidating the relationship with recognition of drugs by drug transporters from a chiral aspect. Enantioselectivity in the transport of drugs by drug transporters and the inhibitory effects of drugs on drug transporters has been summarized in this review.

Pharmacogenomics of proton pump inhibitors

At present, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), as a class of strong antacid agents, are widely used in the clinical treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. PPIs achieved a strong effect of acid suppression with high specificity and long duration. However, the issue of PPI abuse exists worldwide because of the lack of relevant knowledge. Due to tremendous inter-individual differences in uptake, the clinical application of PPIs appears to be limited. Therefore, rational use of PPIs in daily clinical practice is an important research topic. In addition, PPIs were found with many side effects. CYP2C19, as one of the most important enzymes in cytochrome P450 enzyme family, is responsible for the metabolism of over 10% of drugs. The bioavailability and metabolism of PPIs are mainly affected by drug-metabolizing enzymes CYP2C19 and CYP3A4, which are located in the liver. By suppressing cytochrome P450 isoenzyme, PPIs may affect the metabolism of multiple drugs, thus leading to unwanted side effects in case of combined medication. What's more, the individual difference in PPI administration is derived from distinct molecular mechanisms mediated by CYP3A4 and/or CYP2C19. Non-genetic factors, such as combined medication and food pyramid, also impact on the effectiveness of PPIs. Gene mutations can also alter the enzymatic activity of CY2C19, thereby resulting in different blood concentrations of drugs metabolized by CYP2C19. In conclusion, PPIs have the advantages of safety and effectiveness; however, the problem of drug resistance still exists, which indicates their selective application in clinical practice. In this paper, we review the advances in pharmacogenomics of PPIs, with an aim to provide reference to individualized clinical medication.

Pharmacogenomic testing: the case for CYP2C19 proton pump inhibitor gene-drug pairs

The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux and related diseases is increasing, especially in the pediatric population. Prolonged use of PPIs has been associated with several adverse effects, including potentially life-threatening gastric and respiratory infections, which are related to dose or to the degree of gastric acid suppression. Genetic variation in the CYP2C19 gene gives rise to poor and extensive metabolizer phenotypes, which influence PPI clearance, efficacy and exposure. A recent paper linked lansoprazole-associated respiratory infections in children with the poor metabolizer phenotype. The case is made for implementing pharmacogenomic testing for the CYP2C19-PPI gene-drug pair and to dose accordingly in order to minimize PPI-associated infections.

Individualized therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: potential impact of pharmacogenetic testing based on CYP2C19

The main therapeutic agent for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). Plasma levels and the acid inhibitory effect of PPIs depend on the activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19, which is polymorphic. Genotypes of CYP2C19 are classified into three groups: rapid metabolizers (RMs: *1/*1), intermediate metabolizers (IMs: *1/*X), and poor metabolizers (PMs: *X/*X), where *1 and X represent the wild type and the mutant allele, respectively. RMs include ultra-rapid metabolizers, who possess the CYP2C19*17 allele. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PPIs differ among different CYP2C19 genotype groups. Plasma PPI levels and intragastric pH values during PPI treatment are lowest in the RM group, intermediate in the IM group, and highest in the PM group. These CYP2C19-genotype-dependent differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PPIs influence the healing and recurrence of GERD during PPI treatment, suggesting the need for CYP2C19 genotype-based tailored therapy for GERD. CYP2C19 pharmacogenetics should be taken into consideration for the personalization of PPI-based therapy. However, the clinical usefulness of CYP2C19 genotype testing in GERD therapy should be verified in clinical studies.

Individualized therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: potential impact of pharmacogenetic testing based on CYP2C19

The main therapeutic agent for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). Plasma levels and the acid inhibitory effect of PPIs depend on the activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19, which is polymorphic. Genotypes of CYP2C19 are classified into three groups: rapid metabolizers (RMs: *1/*1), intermediate metabolizers (IMs: *1/*X), and poor metabolizers (PMs: *X/*X), where *1 and X represent the wild type and the mutant allele, respectively. RMs include ultra-rapid metabolizers, who possess the CYP2C19*17 allele. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PPIs differ among different CYP2C19 genotype groups. Plasma PPI levels and intragastric pH values during PPI treatment are lowest in the RM group, intermediate in the IM group, and highest in the PM group. These CYP2C19-genotype-dependent differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PPIs influence the healing and recurrence of GERD during PPI treatment, suggesting the need for CYP2C19 genotype-based tailored therapy for GERD. CYP2C19 pharmacogenetics should be taken into consideration for the personalization of PPI-based therapy. However, the clinical usefulness of CYP2C19 genotype testing in GERD therapy should be verified in clinical studies.

Efficacy of S-pantoprazole 20 mg compared with pantoprazole 40 mg in the treatment of reflux esophagitis: a randomized, double-blind comparative trial

BACKGROUND

S-isomer (S) pantoprazole is known to be more effective and less dependent on cytochrome 2C19 than R-isomer (R)-pantoprazole.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of S-pantoprazole 20 mg versus pantoprazole 40 mg for treatment of reflux esophagitis.

METHODS

This multi-center, double-blind, randomized trial enrolled patients with endoscopically documented reflux esophagitis. Patients were assigned to receive either 20 mg S-pantoprazole or 40 mg pantoprazole once daily for 4 weeks. Endoscopy and symptoms were assessed after 4 weeks of treatment. In patients whose reflux esophagitis was not resolved at 4 weeks, treatment was extended to 8 weeks and symptoms were reassessed. Heartburn, chest pain, acid regurgitation, globus, and overall symptoms were rated. The primary efficacy endpoint was healing of esophagitis, and secondary endpoints were symptomatic and endoscopic improvement.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients in the S-pantoprazole group (52 male, mean age 51 years) and 62 in the pantoprazole group (61 male, mean age 50 years) were analyzed per protocol. The healing rate of reflux esophagitis was 85 % at 4 weeks and 94 % at 8 weeks in the S-pantoprazole group, which did not differ from those in the pantoprazole group (84 and 97 %, respectively). After treatment, individual and overall gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and esophagitis improved compared with baseline inflammation in both groups. Intergroup differences in symptoms and endoscopic healing were not significant.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of 20 mg S-pantoprazole were comparable to those of 40 mg pantoprazole for treatment of reflux esophagitis and symptomatic improvement of GERD.

Influence of CYP2C19 and ABCB1 polymorphisms on plasma concentrations of lansoprazole enantiomers after enteral administration

An intraoral annihilation enteric-coated preparation of lansoprazole is often administered via intestinal fistula. The purpose of this study was to determine the plasma concentrations of lansoprazole enantiomers after enteral administration in subjects with cytochrome P4502C19 (CYP2C19) and ABCB1 C3435T genotypes. Fifty-one patients who underwent a curative oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer were enrolled in this study. After a single enteral dose of racemic lansoprazole (30 mg), plasma concentrations of lansoprazole enantiomers were measured 4 h post-dose (C(4h)). There were significant differences in the C(4h) of (R)- and (S)-lansoprazole and the R/S-enantiomer ratio for three CYP2C19 genotype groups (*1/*1, *1/*2 ± *1/*3, and *2/*2 ± *2/*3 ± *3/*3 (poor metabolizers (PMs)), but not the ABCB1 C3435T genotypes. In a stepwise forward selection multiple regression analysis, the C(4h) of (R)- and (S)-lansoprazole were associated with CYP2C19 PMs (p = 0.0005 and < 0.0001 respectively) and age (p = 0.0040 and 0.0121 respectively), while the R/S-enantiomer ratio was associated with CYP2C19*1/*1 (p = 0.0191) and CYP2C19 PMs (p = 0.0426). Direct administration to the jejunum is unaffected by residence time in the stomach and the gastric emptying rate. With enteral administration, CYP2C19 phenotyping of patients using the lansoprazole R/S enantiomer index at C(4h) could be possible.

Pharmacologically active compounds in the environment and their chirality

Pharmacologically active compounds including both legally used pharmaceuticals and illicit drugs are potent environmental contaminants. Extensive research has been undertaken over the recent years to understand their environmental fate and toxicity. The one very important phenomenon that has been overlooked by environmental researchers studying the fate of pharmacologically active compounds in the environment is their chirality. Chiral drugs can exist in the form of enantiomers, which have similar physicochemical properties but differ in their biological properties such as distribution, metabolism and excretion, as these processes (due to stereospecific interactions of enantiomers with biological systems) usually favour one enantiomer over the other. Additionally, due to different pharmacological activity, enantiomers of chiral drugs can differ in toxicity. Furthermore, degradation of chiral drugs during wastewater treatment and in the environment can be stereoselective and can lead to chiral products of varied toxicity. The distribution of different enantiomers of the same chiral drug in the aquatic environment and biota can also be stereoselective. Biological processes can lead to stereoselective enrichment or depletion of the enantiomeric composition of chiral drugs. As a result the very same drug might reveal different activity and toxicity and this will depend on its origin and exposure to several factors governing its fate in the environment. In this critical review a discussion of the importance of chirality of pharmacologically active compounds in the environmental context is undertaken and suggestions for directions in further research are made. Several groups of chiral drugs of major environmental relevance are discussed and their pharmacological action and disposition in the body is also outlined as it is a key factor in developing a full understanding of their environmental occurrence, fate and toxicity. This review will be of interest to environmental scientists, especially those interested in issues associated with environmental contamination with pharmacologically active compounds and chiral pollutants. As the review will outline current state of knowledge on chiral drugs, it will be of value to anyone interested in the phenomenon of chirality, chiral drugs, their stereoselective disposition in the body and environmental fate (212 references).

The effect of CYP2C19 activity on pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole and its active metabolites in healthy subjects

CONTEXT

Lansoprazole is a gastric proton-pump inhibitor and has been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of various peptic diseases. The effects of CYP2C19 activity on the pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole and its active metabolites in Chinese subjects have not previously been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to evaluate the effects of CYP2C19 activity in healthy Chinese volunteers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-two healthy volunteers were recruited for an open trial and received a single dose of 30 mg lansoprazole. Using a validated LC-MS/MS method, we measured the plasma concentrations of lansoprazole, 5-hydroxylansoprazole, and lansoprazole sulfone. The genotype of CYP2C19 was identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Subjects were genotypically classified into the following three groups on the basis of PCR-SNP analysis for CYP2C19: homozygous EM (hmEM) group, heterozygous EM (htEM) group, and PM group. To test differences in pharmacokinetic parameters among the three groups, analysis of variance (ANOVA) after log-transformation of data was used.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that there were significant differences (p < 0.001) between the hmEM and PM groups, between the htEM and PM groups, and between the hmEM and htEM groups in C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-inf) of lansoprazole and lansoprazole sulfone. There were also significant differences (p < 0.001) between the hmEM and PM groups, and between the htEM and PM groups in C(max) of 5-hydroxylansoprazole.

CYP2C19 genotype is associated with symptomatic recurrence of GERD during maintenance therapy with low-dose lansoprazole

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Maintenance therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is usually performed with a low dose of a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI). Because PPIs are metabolized by CYP2C19 in the liver, we investigated whether a patient's CYP2C19 genotype was associated with symptomatic recurrence of GERD during maintenance therapy with a low dose of a PPI.

METHODS

We enrolled 124 patients with erosive GERD whose esophageal mucosal breaks were endoscopically proven to be cured after treatment with lansoprazole 30 mg/day for 8 weeks. When reflux symptoms occurred less than once per week, the dose of lansoprazole was decreased to 15 mg/day, but if symptoms then occurred more than once per week, it was restored to 30 mg/day. CYP2C19 genotypes were classified as rapid metabolizer (RM), intermediate metabolizer (IM) or poor metabolizer (PM).

RESULTS

In 18 of 54 RMs, 28 of 56 IMs, and 8 of 14 PMs, the maintenance dose of lansoprazole was decreased to 15 mg/day, but in 16 (88.9%), 22 (78.6%), and 4 (50%), respectively, there was symptomatic recurrence of GERD and the dose was restored to 30 mg/day. The hazard ratios of symptomatic recurrence of GERD in IMs and PMs compared with RMs were 0.40 (95%CI: 0.19-0.87, P = 0.021) and 0.19 (95%CI: 0.05-0.69, P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

When the dose of lansoprazole is decreased, the RM genotype of CYP2C19 appears to be a risk factor for symptomatic recurrence of GERD. The CYP2C19 genotyping test would be useful for determining the optimal dose of a PPI for maintenance therapy of GERD.

Effect of MDR1 C3435T polymorphism on lansoprazole in healthy Japanese subjects

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The effect of multidrug resistance transporter gene 1 (MDR1) on the bioavailability and kinetics of several substrates has not yet been fully elucidated. We evaluated the influence of MDR1 C3435T polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lansoprazole in Japanese subjects.

METHODS

Fifteen healthy volunteers with the rapid extensive metabolizer genotype of CYP2C19 were classified into three MDR1 C3435T genotype groups: C/C (n = 5), C/T (n = 5), and T/T (n = 5). Lansoprazole 30 mg was administered orally for 15 days. The intragastric pH and plasma lansoprazole levels were determined on days 1 and 15.

RESULTS

On day 1, the mean C(max) of lansoprazole in the T/T group was significantly higher than that in the C/C or C/T groups (T/T 1,248, C/C 618, C/T 607 ng/ml; P = 0.038). On day 15, similar MDR1 genotype-dependent differences were observed in the C(max) of lansoprazole, although smaller than the differences observed on day 1. In contrast, the intragastric pH attained after lansoprazole administration did not differ among MDR1 genotype groups on either day 1 or day 15.

CONCLUSION

Although the sample size was small, our study demonstrated that the MDR1 C3435T polymorphism influenced the pharmacokinetics, but not the pharmacodynamics (i.e., intragastric pH), of lansoprazole in rapid metabolizers of CYP2C19.

Stereoselective disposition of proton pump inhibitors

It is estimated that about half of all therapeutic agents are chiral, but most of these drugs are administered in the form of the racemic mixture, i.e. a 50/50 mixture of its enantiomers. However, chirality is one of the main features of biology, and many of the processes essential for life are stereoselective, implying that two enantiomers may work differently from each other in a physiological environment. Thus, receptors or metabolizing enzymes would recognize one of the ligand enantiomers in favour of the other. With one exception, all presently marketed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)--omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole--used for the treatment of gastric acid-related diseases are racemic mixtures. The exception is esomeprazole, the S-enantiomer of omeprazole, which is the only PPI developed as a single enantiomer drug. The development of esomeprazole (an alkaline salt thereof, e.g. magnesium or sodium) was based on unique metabolic properties that clearly differentiated esomeprazole from omeprazole, the racemate. At comparable doses, these properties led to several clinical advantages, for example higher bioavailability in the majority of patients, i.e. the extensive metabolizers (EMs; 97% in Caucasian and 80-85% in Asian populations), lower exposure in poor metabolizers (PMs; 3% in Caucasian and 15-20% in Asian populations) and lower interindividual variation. For the other, i.e. racemic, PPIs there are some data available on the characteristics of the individual enantiomers, and we have therefore undertaken to analyse the current literature with the purpose of evaluating the potential benefits of developing single enantiomer drugs from lansoprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole. For lansoprazole, the plasma concentrations of the S-enantiomer are lower than those of the R-enantiomer in both EMs and PMs, and, consequently, the variability in the population or between EMs and PMs is not likely to decrease with either of the lansoprazole enantiomers. Furthermore, plasma protein binding differs between the two lansoprazole enantiomers, in that the amount of the free S-enantiomer is two-fold higher than that of the R-enantiomer. This will counteract the difference seen in total plasma concentrations of the enantiomers. Also, studies using expressed human cytochrome P450 isoenzymes show that the metabolism of one enantiomer is significantly affected by the presence of the other, which is likely to result in different pharmacokinetics when administering a single enantiomer. For pantoprazole, there is a negligible difference in plasma concentrations between the two enantiomers in EMs, while the difference is substantial in PMs. The difference in AUC between PMs and EMs would decrease to some extent, but in the majority of the population the variability and efficacy would not be altered with a single enantiomer of pantoprazole. The metabolism of the enantiomers of rabeprazole displays stereoselectivity comparable to that of lansoprazole, i.e. the exposure of the R-enantiomer is higher than that of the S-enantiomer in EMs as well as in PMs, which, by analogy to lansoprazole, makes them less suitable for development of a single enantiomer drug. Furthermore, the chiral stability of the rabeprazole enantiomers may be an issue because of significant degradation of rabeprazole to its sulfide analogue, which is subject to non-stereoselective metabolic regeneration of a mixture of the two enantiomers. In conclusion, in contrast to esomeprazole, the S-enantiomer of omeprazole, minimal if any clinical advantages would be expected in developing any of the enantiomers of lansoprazole, pantoprazole, or rabeprazole as compared with their racemates.

Intestinal CYP3A4 is not involved in the enantioselective disposition of lansoprazole

The contribution of (S)-lansoprazole to CYP3A4-catalysed sulfoxidation is greater than that of (R)-lansoprazole. The aim was to investigate the effect of grapefruit juice on the enantioselective disposition of lansoprazole among three CYP2C19 genotype groups. Eighteen healthy subjects, consisting of six each of homozygous extensive metabolizers (homEMs), heterozygous extensive metabolizers (hetEMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs), ingested a single oral dose of 60 mg racemic lansoprazole after taking either 200 ml grapefruit juice or water. There was no effect of grapefruit juice on the mean maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) or the elimination half-life for each lansoprazole enantiomer in all three CYP2C19 genotype groups. Similarly, the pharmacokinetic parameters of lansoprazole sulfone remained unaltered by grapefruit juice in all three groups. The CYP3A4-mediated first-pass sulfoxidation of (R)- and (S)-lansoprazole were not influenced by grapefruit juice. In addition, stereoselectivity of the intestinal CYP3A4-catalysed sulfoxidation of (R)- and (S)-lansoprazole was not observed.

Comparison of enantioselective disposition of rabeprazole versus lansoprazole in renal-transplant recipients who are CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers

The purpose of this study was to investigate the comparative pharmacokinetics of rabeprazole and lansoprazole enantiomers in renal-transplant recipients on tacrolimus who were CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers. Sixteen Japanese patients were randomly assigned after renal transplantation to receive repeated doses of one of the following two regimens for 28 days; tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone together with either 20mg of racemic rabeprazole (n=8) or 30 mg of racemic lansoprazole (n=8). The mean Cmax and AUC0-24 of (R)-lansoprazole compared to (S)-lansoprazole in renal transplant recipients were 12-fold (954+/-522 vs. 167+/-137 ngml(-1), respectively) and 6.9-fold (4787+/-3454 vs. 451+/-354 nghml(-1), respectively) greater, and its elimination half-life was 2.1-fold (2.3+/-1.0 vs. 1.2+/-0.6h, respectively) longer. In contrast, although the elimination half-life of (R)-rabeprazole was significantly longer than that of the (S)-enantiomer (2.1+/-0.5 vs. 1.3+/-0.9h, respectively; P<0.05), there was no difference in Cmax between the (R)- and (S)-enantiomer (186+/-40 vs. 200+/-92 ngml(-1), respectively). In conclusion, in renal-transplant recipients who are CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers, there is less stereoselective difference in the pharmacokinetic disposition between the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers of rabeprazole than those of lansoprazole.

Is the required therapeutic effect always achieved by racemic switch of proton-pump inhibitors?

Many of the drugs currently used in medical practice are racemates. The enantiomers of a racemic drug differ in pharmacodynamics and/or pharmacokinetics, thus in some cases it is preferable to develop pure enantiomers by racemic switch. In a recent study by Pai et al, dexrabeprazole [R(+)-rabeprazole] (10 mg) was found to be more effective than rabeprazole (20 mg) in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. We read with great interest in this study and discussed whether such racemic switch would be applicable to other proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). A literature review indicates that stereoselective pharmacokinetics, rather than stereoselective pharmacological activity, is the main cause of differences in clinical efficacy between pure enantiomer and racemic PPI. Racemic switches of PPI provide the therapeutic advantages such as reducing metabolic load on the body, simplifying pharmacokinetics, providing benefit to the non-responders to standard dose of racemate, more homogenous response to treatment and better efficacy with equal safety. Further studies in quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) are needed to address the fact that the preferred enantiomer of PPI is not always in the same absolute configuration, i.e., S-form is for omeprazole, pantoprazole and tenatoprazole whereas R-form is for lansoprazole and rabeprazole.

Influence of Cytochrome P450 (CYP)??3A5 Polymorphisms on the Pharmacokinetics of Lansoprazole Enantiomers in CYP2C19 Extensive Metaboliser Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Lansoprazole is extensively metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 and CYP3A4. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of CYP3A5 polymorphism (A6986G) on the pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole enantiomers in renal transplant recipients who are CYP2C19 extensive metabolisers (EMs).

METHODS

Among 40 Japanese CYP2C19 EMs, 20 had the CYP3A5*1 allele (*1/*1 in two subjects and *1/*3 in 18 subjects) and 20 had the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype. After repeated oral doses of racemic lansoprazole 30mg once daily for 28 days, plasma concentrations of lansoprazole enantiomers were determined using high performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curves from 0 to infinity (AUC(infinity)) of (R)- and (S)-lansoprazole in recipients with the CYP3A5*1 allele were 3145 and 384 ng * h/mL, respectively, compared with 4218 and 587 ng * h/mL in recipients with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype. The AUC(infinity) and the maximum plasma concentration of (R)- and (S)-lansoprazole in subjects with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype were greater than subjects with CYP3A5*1/*1 + *1/*3 alleles. The mean R/S ratio for AUC of lansoprazole in each CYP3A5 genotype group was the same (12.6).

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that CYP3A5 genotype is not an important determinant of enantioselective disposition of lansoprazole. Based on our results and those of previous studies, the enantioselective disposition of lansoprazole appears to be primarily influenced by enantioselective metabolism by CYP2C19 rather than by CYP3A.

Enantioselective disposition of rabeprazole in relation to CYP2C19 genotypes

AIM

Rabeprazole is metabolized to some extent by CYP2C19. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the pharmacokinetics of each rabeprazole enantiomer in three different CYP2C19 genotype groups.

METHODS

Twenty-four healthy subjects, of whom each each were homozygous extensive metabolizers (homEMs), heterozygous extensive metabolizers (hetEMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs) for CYP2C19, participated in our study. After a single oral dose of 20 mg of racemic rabeprazole, the plasma concentrations of the rabeprazole enantiomers were measured over the course of 24 h.

RESULTS

The area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC) of (R)-rabeprazole in homEMs, hetEMs and PMs were 1.8-, 2.2- and 2.4-fold, respectively, greater than those of (S)-rabeprazole; the relative AUC ratios of (R)- and (S)-rabeprazole in homEMs, hetEMs and PMs were 1:1.1:2.1 and 1:0.9:1.5, respectively. The mean maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of (R)-rabeprazole in homEMs, hetEMs and PMs were 1.7-, 1.9- and 1.8-fold higher, respectively, than those of the corresponding (S)-enantiomer (P<0.05). There was no difference between homEMs and PMs in the elimination half-life of (S)-rabeprazole, whereas the elimination half-life of (R)-rabeprazole was significantly longer in PMs than in homEMs [1.7 h (1.4, 2.0) (mean (95% confidence interval)]vs. 0.8 h (0.6, 1.0), respectively, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

(R)-Rabeprazole disposition was influenced to a greater degree by CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms than was that of (S)-rabeprazole. The effect of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on the stereoselective disposition of rabeprazole was less than those of lansoprazole and omeprazole.

Enantioselective Disposition of Lansoprazole and Rabeprazole in Human Plasma

Lansoprazole is extensively metabolized by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 in the liver, whereas rabeprazole is primarily converted non-enzymatically to rabeprazole-thioether, with only some being oxidized by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. Lansoprazole and rabeprazole possess asymmetric sulfur in their chemical structure and have typically been used clinically as a racemic mixture. This article reviews the pharmacokinetic differences between enantiomers of lansoprazole and rabeprazole in relation to the CYP2C19 genotypes. In our studies in healthy Japanese subjects, the magnitude of contribution of each lansoprazole enantiomer for CYP2C19 was greater than that for CYP3A4. CYP2C19 influenced the disposition of (S)-lansoprazole to a greater extent than the (R)-enantiomer. The R/S ratios for the AUC of lansoprazole in CYP2C19 homEMs, hetEMs and PMs was 12.7, 8.5 and 5.8, respectively. On the other hand, (R)-rabeprazole disposition was influenced to a greater degree by CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms than (S)-rabeprazole. However, the R/S ratios for the AUC of rabeprazole in CYP2C19 homEMs, hetEMs and PMs was only 1.8, 2.2 and 2.4, respectively, suggesting a lesser effect of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on the stereoselective disposition of rabeprazole compared to lansoprazole. Such a difference in the AUC between rabeprazole enantiomers is likely to be dependent on stereoselectivity in the CYP3A4-mediated metabolic conversion from rabeprazole-thioether to rabeprazole. Both enantiomers of these PPIs have been reported to possess equal potency. Therefore, particularly with lansoprazole, the use of (R)-lansoprazole alone would be highly desirable for use in clinical applications.

Papel del polimorfismo genético CYP2C19 en los efectos adversos a fármacos y en el riesgo para diversas enfermedades

There are a great number of polymorphic genes in the human genome. Many of them codify enzymes that metabolizes drugs and xenobiotic agents, including carcinogens. Among the better known of them, there are a number of isozymes of the microsomal oxidative system (CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 y CYP2D6). This article reviews the following issues: a) frequency of presentation of the "poor metabolizer" genotype and/or phenotype for substrates of CYP2C19; b) role of CYP2C19 polymorphism on the metabolism of some drugs (mephenytoine and other antiepileptic drugs, proton pump inhibitors, several antidepressants and anxyolitics, the antimalaria aggent proguanyl, and propranolol, among others, use this metabolic pathway), and c) possible role of CYP2C19 polymorphism in the risk for development of neoplasia and other diseases (systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, hip osteonecrosis, Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, essential tremor).

Enantioselective disposition of lansoprazole in relation to CYP2C19 genotypes in the presence of fluvoxamine

AIMS

Lansoprazole is affected by polymorphism of CYP2C19. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of fluvoxamine, a CYP2C19 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of each lansoprazole enantiomer among three different CYP2C19 genotype groups.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy subjects, of whom six each were homozygous extensive metabolizers (homEMs), heterozygous extensive metabolizers (hetEMs), or poor metabolizers (PMs) for CYP2C19, participated in the study. Each subject received either placebo or fluvoxamine, 25 mg twice daily for 6 days, then a single oral dose of 60 mg of racemic lansoprazole. The plasma concentrations of lansoprazole enantiomers and lansoprazole sulphone were subsequently measured for 24 h post lansoprazole administration using liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

In the homEMs and hetEMs, fluvoxamine significantly increased the AUC(0, infinity) and C(max) and prolonged the elimination half-life of both (R)- and (S)-lansoprazole, whereas in the PMs, the only statistically significant effect of fluvoxamine was on the AUC(0, infinity) for (R)-lansoprazole. The mean fluvoxamine-mediated percent increase in the AUC(0, infinity) of (R)-lansoprazole in the homEMs compared with the PMs was significant (P = 0.0117); however, C(max) did not differ among the three CYP2C19 genotypes. On the other hand, fluvoxamine induced a significant percent increase in both the AUC(0, infinity) and C(max) for (S)-lansoprazole in the homEMs compared with the hetEMs (P = 0.0007 and P = 0.0125, respectively) as well as compared with the PMs (P < 0.0001 for each parameter). The mean R : S ratio for AUC(0, infinity) of lansoprazole in the homEMs was significantly different between the placebo and the fluvoxamine treatment groups (12.7 (9.1, 16.8) vs 6.4 (5.4, 7.4), respectively, P < 0.0001), though not in the PMs (5.5 (4.3, 6.7) vs 5.9 (5.3, 6.5), respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The magnitude of the contribution of CYP2C19 to the metabolism of (S)-lansoprazole is much greater compared with that of the (R)-enantiomer. In extensive metabolizers, hepatic CYP2C19 plays an important role in the absorption and elimination of lansoprazole, particularly the (S)-enantiomer.

Effect of clarithromycin on the enantioselective disposition of lansoprazole in relation to CYP2C19 genotypes

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of clarithromycin, a CYP3A4 inhibitor, on the enantioselective disposition of lansoprazole among three different CYP2C19 genotype groups in healthy Japanese subjects. These subjects included 6 each of homozygous extensive metabolizers (homEMs), heterozygous extensive metabolizers (hetEMs), and poor metabolizers (PMs). In the EMs of CYP2C19, clarithromycin markedly increased Cmax and the AUC0-infinity of (S)-lansoprazole and (S)-hydroxylansoprazole compared with those of the corresponding (R)-enantiomers. Clarithromycin significantly increased Cmax and the AUC0-infinity of (S)-lansoprazole in the homEMs by 110% and 115%, respectively, and in the hetEMs by 105% and 103%, respectively, compared with placebo. Furthermore, clarithromycin slightly prolonged the elimination half-life of (R)-lansoprazole in the homEMs and hetEMs but did not alter that of (S)-lansoprazole. In the of PMs CYP2C19, clarithromycin significantly increased Cmax and the AUC0-infinity and significantly prolonged the elimination half-lives of (R)- and (S)-lansoprazole by 51% and 49%, respectively. The present study suggests that there are significant drug interactions between (R)- or (S)-lansoprazole and clarithromycin in EMs by inhibiting the CYP3A4-catalyzed sulfoxidation primarily during the first pass, whereas in PMs, the overall metabolism of lansoprazole is inhibited.