Thiopurine S-methyltransferase as a target for drug interactions

Drug Repurposing in Crohn's Disease Using Danish Real-World Data

Aim

Drug repurposing, utilizing electronic healthcare records (EHRs), offers a promising alternative by repurposing existing drugs for new therapeutic indications, especially for patients lacking effective therapies. Intestinal fibrosis, a severe complication of Crohn's disease (CD), poses significant challenges, increasing morbidity and mortality without available pharmacological treatments. This article focuses on identifying medications associated with an elevated or reduced risk of fibrosis in CD patients through a population-wide real-world data and artificial intelligence (AI) approach.

Methods

Patients aged 65 or older with a diagnosis of CD from 1996 to 2019 in the Danish EHRs were followed for up to 24 years. The primary outcome was the need of specific surgical procedures, namely proctocolectomy with ileostomy and ileocecal resection as proxies of intestinal fibrosis. The study explored drugs linked to an increased or reduced risk of the study outcome through machine-learning driven survival analysis.

Results

Among the 9179 CD patients, 1029 (11.2%) underwent surgery, primarily men (58.5%), with a mean age of 76 years, 10 drugs were linked to an elevated risk of surgery for proctocolectomy with ileostomy and ileocecal resection. In contrast, 10 drugs were associated with a reduced risk of undergoing surgery for these conditions.

Conclusion

This study focuses on repurposing existing drugs to prevent surgery related to intestinal fibrosis in CD patients, using Danish EHRs and advanced statistical methods. The findings offer valuable insights into potential treatments for this condition, addressing a critical unmet medical need. Further research and clinical trials are warranted to validate the effectiveness of these repurposed drugs in preventing surgery related to intestinal fibrosis in CD patients.

Advances in Thiopurine Drug Delivery: The Current State-of-the-Art

Thiopurines (mercaptopurine, azathioprine and thioguanine) are well-established maintenance treatments for a wide range of diseases such as leukemia, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other inflammatory and autoimmune diseases in general. Worldwide, millions of patients are treated with thiopurines. The use of thiopurines has been limited because of off-target effects such as myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity. Therefore, seeking methods to enhance target-based thiopurine-based treatment is relevant, combined with pharmacogenetic testing. Controlled-release formulations for thiopurines have been clinically tested and have shown promising outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease. Latest developments in nano-formulations for thiopurines have shown encouraging pre-clinical results, but further research and development are needed. This review provides an overview of novel drug delivery strategies for thiopurines, reviewing modified release formulations and with a focus on nano-based formulations.

Validation of a high-performance liquid chromatography method for thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity in whole blood using 6-mercaptopurine as substrate

BACKGROUND

Variation in metabolism, toxicity and therapeutic efficacy of thiopurine drugs is largely influenced by genetic polymorphisms in the thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) gene. Determination of TPMT activity is routinely performed in patients to adjust drug therapy.

METHODS

We further optimized a previously established high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method by measuring TPMT activity in whole blood instead of isolated erythrocytes, which is based on conversion of 6-mercaptopurine to 6-methylmercaptopurine using S-adenosyl-methionine as methyl donor.

RESULTS

The simplified TPMT whole-blood method showed similar or better analytical and diagnostic performance compared with the former erythrocyte assay. The whole-blood method was linear for TPMT activities between 0 and 40 nmol/(mL·h) with a quantification limit of 0.1 nmol/(mL·h). Within-day imprecision and between-day imprecision were ≤5.1% and ≤8.5%, respectively. The optimized method determining TPMT activity in whole blood (y) showed agreement with the former method determining TPMT activity in erythrocytes (x) (n=45, y=1.218+0.882x; p>0.05). Phenotype-genotype concordance (n=300) of the whole-blood method was better when TPMT activity was expressed per volume of whole blood (specificity 92.2%), whereas correction for hematocrit resulted in lower genotype concordance (specificity 86.9%). A new cutoff for the whole-blood method to distinguish normal from reduced TPMT activity was determined at ≤6.7 nmol/(mL·h).

CONCLUSIONS

This optimized TPMT phenotyping assay from whole blood using 6-MP as substrate is suitable for research and routine clinical analysis.

Individualizing immunosuppression in lung transplantation

Immunosuppression management after lung transplantation continues to evolve, with an increasing number of agents available for use in various combinations allowing for more choice and individualization of immunosuppressive therapy. Therapeutic developments have led to improved outcomes including lower acute rejection rates and improved survival. However, a one size fits all approach for any immunosuppressive strategy may not be best suited to the individual patient and ultimately patient specific factors must be considered when designing the immunosuppressive regimen. Recipient factors including age, race, co-morbidities, immunologic risk, genetic polymorphisms, concomitant and previous pharmacotherapy, and overall immunosuppression burden should be considered. There are several significant drug-drug interactions with select immunosuppressive agents utilized in lung transplant pharmacotherapy that must be considered when choosing and devising a dosing strategy for an individual immunosuppressive agent. Herein, considerations for immunosuppression management in the individual patient will be reviewed.

In Vitro Protein Stability of Two Naturally Occurring Thiopurine S-Methyltransferase Variants: Biophysical Characterization of TPMT*6 and TPMT*8

Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) is a polymorphic enzyme involved in the metabolism and inactivation of thiopurine substances administered as immunosuppressants in the treatment of malignancies and autoimmune diseases. In this study, the naturally occurring variants, TPMT*6 (Y180F) and TPMT*8 (R215H), have been biophysically characterized. Despite being classified as low and intermediate in vivo enzyme activity variants, respectively, our results demonstrate a discrepancy because both TPMT*6 and TPMT*8 were found to exhibit normal functionality in vitro. While TPMT*8 exhibited biophysical properties almost indistinguishable from those of TPMTwt, the TPMT*6 variant was found to be destabilized. Furthermore, the contributions of the cofactor S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the thermodynamic stability of TPMT were investigated, but only a modest stabilizing effect was observed. Also presented herein is a new method for studies of the biophysical characteristics of TPMT and its variants using the extrinsic fluorescent probe 8-anilinonaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (ANS). ANS was found to bind strongly to all investigated TPMT variants with a K_d of approximately 0.2 μM and a 1:1 binding ratio as determined by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). Circular dichroism and fluorescence measurements showed that ANS binds exclusively to the native state of TPMT, and binding to the active site was confirmed by molecular modeling and simulated docking as well as ITC measurements. The strong binding of the probe to native TPMT and the conformity of the obtained results demonstrate the advantages of using ANS binding characteristics in studies of this protein and its variants.

Pre-analytic and analytic sources of variations in thiopurine methyltransferase activity measurement in patients prescribed thiopurine-based drugs: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Low thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) enzyme activity is associated with increased thiopurine drug toxicity, particularly myelotoxicity. Pre-analytic and analytic variables for TPMT genotype and phenotype (enzyme activity) testing were reviewed.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed, and diagnostic laboratories were surveyed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies reported relevant data for pre-analytic variables (patient age, gender, race, hematocrit, co-morbidity, co-administered drugs and specimen stability) and thirty-three for analytic variables (accuracy, reproducibility). TPMT is stable in blood when stored for up to 7 days at room temperature, and 3 months at -30°C. Pre-analytic patient variables do not affect TPMT activity. Fifteen drugs studied to date exerted no clinically significant effects in vivo. Enzymatic assay is the preferred technique. Radiochemical and HPLC techniques had intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CVs) below 10%.

CONCLUSION

TPMT is a stable enzyme, and its assay is not affected by age, gender, race or co-morbidity.

Thiopurine metabolism monitoring: implications in inflammatory bowel diseases

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines (TP) are widely used in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases. Side effects and inefficacy are a major concern as they lead to withdrawal of the drug.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tools investigating TP metabolism are useful to avoid inadequate cessation of TP therapy.

RESULTS

TP metabolism is complex and many enzymes are involved. Among them, Thiopurine methyl transferase is the only one routinely measured by pheno- or genotyping. A decreased TPMT activity results in a potential overdosing of TP drugs leading to myelotoxicity, whereas an ultra-high activity leads to TP ineffectiveness and overproduction of methylated compounds responsible for hepatotoxicity. TPMT determination prior to TP treatment results in an individual adapted dose. Xanthine oxidase/dehydrogenase (XOD), inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase (ITPA) and glutathion-S-transferase (GST) are other promising enzyme targets that might help to explain TP efficacy or toxicity. ITPA and GST polymorphisms might potentially be related to some TP side effects, while a XOD inhibition by allopurinol could avoid TP-related hepatotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of thiopurine metabolites, 6-thioguanine nucleotides and 6-methylmercaptopurine, is discussed, specifically, in case of thiopurine failure and recommendations are given about their interpretation and potential dose optimization. These enzymes and metabolites tests are complementary to the regular monitoring of blood cells count and liver tests which remains mandatory.

Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) assessment prior to starting thiopurine drug treatment; a pharmacogenomic test whose time has come

Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) is involved in the metabolism of thiopurine drugs. Patients that due to genetic variation lack this enzyme or have lower levels than normal, can be adversely affected if normal doses of thiopurines are prescribed. The evidence for measuring TPMT prior to starting patients on thiopurine drug therapy has been reviewed and the various approaches to establishing a service considered. Until recently clinical guidelines on the use of the TPMT varied by medical specialty. This has now changed, with clear guidance encouraging clinicians to use the TPMT test prior to starting any patient on thiopurine therapy. The TPMT test is the first pharmacogenomic test that has crossed from research to routine use. Several analytical approaches can be taken to assess TPMT status. The use of phenotyping supported with genotyping on selected samples has emerged as the analytical model that has enabled national referral services to be developed to a high level in the UK. The National Health Service now has access to cost-effective and timely TPMT assay services, with two laboratories undertaking the majority of the work at national level and with several local services developing. There appears to be adequate capacity and an appropriate internal market to ensure that TPMT assay services are commensurate with the clinical demand.

Clinical pharmacology and pharmacogenetics of thiopurines

The thiopurine drugs-azathioprine (AZA), 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), and thioguanine-are widely used to treat malignancies, rheumatic diseases, dermatologic conditions, inflammatory bowel disease, and solid organ transplant rejection. However, thiopurine drugs have a relatively narrow therapeutic index and are capable of causing life-threatening toxicity, most often myelosuppression. Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT; EC 2.1.1.67), an enzyme that catalyzes S-methylation of these drugs, exhibits a genetic polymorphism in 10% of Caucasians, with 1/300 individuals having complete deficiency. Patients with intermediate or deficient TPMT activity are at risk for excessive toxicity after receiving standard doses of thiopurine medications. This report reviews the recent advances in the knowledge of the mechanism of action as well as the molecular basis and interethnic variations of TPMT and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase (ITPase; EC 3.6.1.19), another enzyme implicated in thiopurine toxicity. In addition, an update on pharmacokinetics, metabolism, drug-drug interactions, safety, and tolerability of thiopurine drugs is provided.

Beyond TPMT: genetic influences on thiopurine drug responses in inflammatory bowel disease

Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine are widely used in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, approximately 25% of IBD patients experience toxicity, and up to 10% show resistance to these thiopurine drugs. The importance of genetic variability in determining thiopurine toxicity was first recognized over 25 years ago with the discovery of the thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) polymorphism and the occurrence of azathioprine-induced myelosuppression in TPMT-deficient patients. In the intervening period, TPMT has become the foremost example of pharmacogenetics, and TPMT deficiency represents one of the few pharmacogenetic phenomena that have successfully made the transition from the research laboratory to diagnostics. While TPMT activity predicts some cases of myelosuppression, deficiency in this enzyme is neither predictive of other adverse drug reactions, nor resistance to thiopurine therapy. As myelosuppression only accounts for approximately 2.5% of adverse reactions in IBD patients, researchers are increasingly turning their attention to other enzymes involved in thiopurine metabolism to find molecular explanations for intolerance and resistance to azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine. In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge with regards to TPMT, and also explore genetic variability, beyond TPMT, that may contribute to thiopurine response in IBD patients.

Inhibition of Human Thiopurine S-Methyltransferase by Various Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs in Vitro: A Mechanism for Possible Drug Interactions

Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) is a biotransformation phase II enzyme responsible for the metabolic inactivation of thiopurine drugs. The present study was carried out to investigate the inhibitory potential of 15 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on human TPMT activity in vitro. TPMT activity was measured in pooled human erythrocytes in the absence and presence of various NSAIDs using the previously published high-performance liquid chromatography-UV method. To determine the inhibition type and K(i) value for each compound, we performed kinetic analysis at five different inhibitor concentrations close to the IC(50) value obtained in preliminary experiments. Naproxen (K(i) = 52 microM), mefenamic acid (K(i) = 39 microM), and tolfenamic acid (K(i) = 50 microM) inhibited TPMT activity in a noncompetitive manner. The estimated K(i) values for the inhibition of TPMT by ketoprofen (K(i) = 172 microM) and ibuprofen (K(i) = 1043 microM) indicated that the propionic acid derivatives were relatively weak inhibitors of TPMT. Our results suggest that coadministration of thiopurines and various NSAIDs may lead to drug interactions.

Thiopurine treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: clinical pharmacology and implication of pharmacogenetically guided dosing

This review summarises clinical pharmacological aspects of thiopurines in the treatment of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Current knowledge of pharmacogenetically guided dosing is discussed for individualisation of thiopurine therapy, particularly to avoid severe adverse effects. Both azathioprine and mercaptopurine are pro-drugs that undergo extensive metabolism. The catabolic enzyme thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) is polymorphically expressed, and currently 23 genetic variants have been described. On the basis of an excellent phenotype-genotype correlation for TPMT, genotyping has become a safe and reliable tool for determination of a patient's individual phenotype. Thiopurine-related adverse drug reactions are frequent, ranging from 5% up to 40%, in both a dose-dependent and -independent manner. IBD patients with low TPMT activity are at high risk of developing severe haematotoxicity if pharmacogenetically guided dosing is not performed. Based on several cost-benefit analyses, assessment of TPMT activity is recommended prior to thiopurine therapy in patients with IBD. The underlying mechanisms of azathioprine/mercaptopurine-related hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis and azathioprine intolerance are still unknown. Although the therapeutic response appears to be related to 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) concentrations above a threshold of 230-260 pmol per 8 x 10(8) red blood cells, at present therapeutic drug monitoring of 6-TGN can be recommended only to estimate patients' compliance.Drug-drug interactions between azathioprine/mercaptopurine and aminosalicylates, diuretics, NSAIDs, warfarin and infliximab are discussed. The concomitant use of allopurinol without dosage adjustment of azathioprine/mercaptopurine leads to clinically relevant severe haematotoxicity due to elevated thiopurine levels. Several studies indicate that thiopurine therapy in IBD during pregnancy is safe. Thus, azathioprine/mercaptopurine should not be withdrawn in strictly indicated cases of pregnant IBD patients. However, breastfeeding is contraindicated during azathioprine/mercaptopurine therapy. Use of azathioprine/mercaptopurine for induction and maintenance of remission in corticosteroid-dependent or corticosteroid-refractory IBD, particularly Crohn's disease, is evidence based. To improve response rates in thiopurine therapy of IBD, comprehensive analyses including metabolic patterns and genome-wide profiling in patients with azathioprine/mercaptopurine treatment are required to identify novel candidate genes.

[Monitoring of thiopurine methyltransferase and thiopurine metabolites to optimize azathioprine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease]

Determination of the activity of thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) and of thiopurine metabolites (6-thioguanine and 6-methylmercaptopurine nucleotides) could be useful for individualized monitoring of azathioprine (AZA) and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) doses. TPMT activity in the general population follows a trimodal distribution, in which approximately 0.3% of the population is homozygotic for the low-activity allele. A notable correlation has been observed between the low TPMP activity genotype or phenotype and the risk of myelotoxicity. Patients with a high TPMT activity genotype or homozygous phenotype should receive immunosuppressive doses that have clearly been demonstrated to be effective. In contrast, in patients with a low TPMT activity genotype or homozygous phenotype, the use of AZA/6-MP should be contraindicated or only very small doses should be administered. Importantly, TPMP deficiency explains only some cases of myelotoxicity and consequently periodic laboratory testing should be performed in patients receiving AZA/6-MP, even though TPMP function may be normal. Currently, the utility of routine thiopurine metabolite determinations in patients undergoing AZA/6-MP therapy has not been established and this practice should be limited to specific situations such as lack of response to thiopurine therapy or the occurrence of thiopurine-related adverse effects. Randomized trials comparing the routine strategy of AZA/6-MP dosing (based exclusively on the patient's weight) versus individualized monitoring (based on quantification of TPMP activity and/or thiopurine metabolites) are required before definitive conclusions on the most effective alternative can be drawn.

Monitoring of Thiopurine Methyltransferase Activity in Postsurgical Patients With Crohn's Disease During 1 Year of Treatment With Azathioprine or Mesalazine

Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) activity determines biotransformation of azathioprine and, thereby, drug efficacy and safety. Evaluation of a possible long-term effect of mesalazine or azathioprine on TPMT activity is of particular clinical importance because both drugs can to be given for several years in inflammatory bowel disease. Monitoring of TPMT activity and three thiopurine metabolites was performed prospectively during a 1 year postoperative period in 21 patients with Crohn's disease randomly assigned to azathioprine (2.0-2.5 mg/kg per day) or mesalazine (4 g/day). TPMT activity did not change significantly within each treatment group during 52 weeks. At any study visit, TPMT activity was not different between 13 patients on azathioprine and eight patients on mesalazine. Concentrations of 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN, active moiety of azathioprine) and 6-methyl-mercaptopurine ribonucleotides (6-MMPR) did not alter significantly during the observation period, except for a slight decrease in 6-TGN levels when comparing the first with the last visit. In this first report of serial monitoring of 6-methyl-thioguanine nucleotides (6-MTGN) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease taking azathioprine, high levels of 6-TGN were correlated with high levels of 6-MTGN, with the mean 6-TGN:6-MTGN ratio being 2.4. In a well-standardized clinical setting of inflammatory bowel disease, neither mesalazine nor azathioprine significantly affected TPMT activity during a whole year of treatment.