Drug-related deaths among inpatients: a meta-analysis

Characteristics of CYP3A4-related potential drug-drug interactions in outpatients receiving prescriptions from multiple clinical departments

BACKGROUND

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) increase the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In a previous report, we revealed that the incidence of potential DDIs due to the same CYP molecular species in one prescription exceeds 90% among patients taking six or more drugs and that CYP3A4 markedly influences the increase in the number of potential DDIs in clinical practice. However, the factors contributing to an increased number of potential DDIs in prescriptions from multiple clinical departments remain poorly clarified.

METHODS

This observational study was performed at five pharmacies in Okayama Prefecture, Japan. Patients who visited these pharmacies from 11 April 2022 to 24 April 2022 were included, except those who had prescriptions only from a single clinical department. A stratified analysis was performed to determine the incidence of CYP3A4-related potential DDIs according to the number of drugs taken. Additionally, factors associated with an increase in the number of drugs involved in CYP3A4-related potential DDIs were identified using multiple linear regression analysis. In this study, potential DDIs for the prescription data subdivided by clinical department, containing two or more drugs, were used as control data.

RESULTS

Overall, 372 outpatients who received prescriptions from multiple clinical departments were included in the current study. The number of drugs contributing to CYP3A4-related potential DDIs increased with an increase in the number of clinical departments. Notably, in cases taking fewer than six drugs, prescriptions from multiple clinical departments had a higher frequency of CYP3A4-related potential DDIs than those in prescriptions subdivided by clinical department. Multiple regression analysis identified "Cardiovascular agents", "Agents affecting central nervous system", and "Urogenital and anal organ agents" as the top three drug classes that increase CYP3A4-related potential DDIs.

CONCLUSION

Collectively, these results highlight the importance of a unified management strategy for prescribed drugs and continuous monitoring of ADRs in outpatients receiving prescriptions from multiple clinical departments even if the number of drugs taken is less than six.

Economic impact of a clinical pharmacist in the orthopaedic sector: a review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

This review of the literature aimed to evaluate the economic impact of a clinical pharmacist in the orthopaedic sector.

METHODS

The review followed the PRISMA recommendations. A bibliographic search was conducted on 23 June 2023 using PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. All articles in French or English with economic data on clinical pharmacy activities in orthopaedics were included. Articles not mentioning the term 'orthopaedics' and those published prior to 1990 were excluded. Data from the studies were compiled in an Excel table. A bias analysis using the ROBINS-I Cochrane tool was performed. The methodology of the studies was compared and weighted using the CHEERS and STROBE checklists.

RESULTS

Among 529 articles initially identified, 10 were included in the review. The cost-benefit ratio of a clinical pharmacist in orthopaedics ranged from 0.47:1 to 28:1. The maximum savings reached US$73 410 /year in the American study and €1 42 356 /year in the French study. For three studies, the cost of a clinical pharmacist was not evaluated. Eight studies showed a positive economic impact. The Dutch study showed a balance and the Danish study showed a negative economic impact of €3442/month.

CONCLUSIONS

This literature review has shown an economic benefit of a clinical pharmacist in the orthopaedic sector despite several biases and methodological limitations. The two studies that did not confirm this benefit only evaluated a limited number of expected benefits. Nevertheless, the economic impact of the clinical pharmacist in the orthopaedic sector seems positive and undervalued.

Impact of suspected adverse drug reactions on mortality and length of hospital stay in the hospitalised patients: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To estimate the risk of mortality and length of stay in hospitalised patients who have experienced suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) as compared to patients who did not experience suspected ADRs.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on databases for observational and randomised controlled studies conducted in any inpatient setting that reported deaths and/or length of hospital stay in patients who had suspected ADRs and did not have suspected ADRs during hospitalisation. PRISMA guidelines were strictly followed during the review. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using a tool designed by Smyth et al. for the studies of adverse drug reactions. The meta-analytic summary of all-cause mortality was estimated using odds ratio-OR (95% CI) and length of stay using mean difference-MD (95% CI). Both outcomes were pooled using a random effect model (DerSimonian and Laird method). Subgroup and meta-regression were performed based on study variables: study design, age group, study ward, study region, types of suspected ADRs (ADR_Ad-suspected ADRs that lead to hospitalisation and ADR_In-suspected ADRs that occur following hospitalisation), study duration, sample size and study period. The statistical analysis was conducted through the 'Review manager software version 5.4.1 and JASP (Version 0.14.1)'.

RESULTS

After screening 475 relevant articles, 55 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Patients having suspected ADRs had reported significantly higher odds of all-cause mortality [OR: 1.50 (95% CI: 1.21-1.86; I² = 100%) than those patients who did not have suspected ADRs during hospitalisation. Study wards, types of suspected ADRs and sample size were observed as significant predictors of all-cause mortality (p < 0.05). Patients having suspected ADRs had reported significantly higher mean difference in hospital stay [MD: 3.98 (95% CI: 2.91, 5.05; I² = 99%) than those patients who did not have suspected ADRs during hospitalisation. Types of suspected ADRs and study periods were observed as significant predictors of length of stay (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Suspected ADRs significantly increase the risk of mortality and length of stay in hospitalised patients.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

CRD42020176320.

Prioritisation of Adverse Drug Events Leading to Hospital Admission and Occurring during Hospitalisation: A RAND Survey

(1) Adverse drug events (ADEs) are a common cause of emergency department visits and occur frequently during hospitalisation. Instruments that facilitate the detection of the most relevant ADEs could lead to a more targeted and efficient use of limited resources in research and practice. (2) We conducted two consensus processes based on the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, in order to prioritise ADEs leading to hospital admission (panel 1) and occurring during hospital stay (panel 2) for inclusion in future ADE measurement instruments. In each panel, the experts were asked to assess the “overall importance” of each ADE on a four-point Likert scale (1 = not important to 4 = very important). ADEs with a median rating of ≥3 without disagreement were defined as “prioritised“. (3) The 13 experts in panel 1 prioritised 38 out of 65 ADEs, while the 12 experts in panel 2 prioritised 34 out of 63 ADEs. The highest rated events were acute kidney injury and hypoglycaemia (both panels), as well as Stevens–Johnson syndrome in panel 1 and rhabdomyolysis in panel 2. (4) The survey led to a set of ADEs for which there was consensus that they were of particular importance as presentations of acute medication-related harm, thereby providing a focus for further medication safety research and clinical practice.