Large-volume breast fat transfer: technical evolutions and safety aspects based on over 800 cases and 26 years of follow-up

Safety and Effectiveness of Single Session Mega Volume Fat Grafting for Breast Augmentation: A Space-Creating Concept and Clinical Experiences

BACKGROUND

The main drawback of fat transfer breast augmentation is the need for multiple sessions of fat injection. For approximately 15 years, stem cells and the Brava device for breast expansion have been discussed and extensively investigated to address relevant challenges. However, the safety and effectiveness of autologous fat transfer as a single-session primary breast augmentation technique has not yet been standardized.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to achieve mega volume fat breast augmentation in a single session by developing a "space-creating" approach that emphasizes the use of highly purified fat to achieve an optimized surgical outcome with large-volume breast augmentation.

METHODS

Female patients who underwent aesthetic breast augmentation (October 2013-October 2020) involving the application of this space-creating technique for mega volume autologous fat transfer were retrospectively enrolled. Inclusion criteria were patients with hypomastia, breast asymmetry, and volume replacement following implant removal with BMI ≥18.5 kg/m2. After macrospace creation, highly purified fat was injected in several rounds during the procedure. A breast massage was performed between each stage (microspace creation). Breast circumference, nipple-inframammary fold distance, and cup size were recorded during 6 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. Average fat injection volumes of 510.9 mL in the right breast and 490.8 mL in the left breast resulted in at least a 2 cup size increase. The significant outcome remained stable at 6 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The space-creating technique and the injection of highly purified fat achieves stable cosmetic outcomes of mega volume breast augmentation in a single session.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

New perspectives in regenerative medicine and surgery: the bioactive composite therapies (BACTs)

Regenerative medicine and surgery is a rapidly expanding branch of translational research in tissue engineering, cellular and molecular biology. To date, the methods to improve cell intake, survival, and isolation need to comply with a complex and still unclear regulatory frame, becoming everyday more restrictive and often limiting the effectiveness and outcome of the therapeutic choices. Thus, the authors developed a novel 360° regenerative strategy based on the synergic action of several new components called the bioactive composite therapies (BACTs) to improve grafted cells intake, and survival in total compliance with the legal and ethical limits of the current regulatory frame. The rationale at the origin of this new technology is based on the evidence that cells need supportive substrate to survive in vitro and this observation, applying the concept of translational medicine, is true also in vivo. Bioactive composite mixtures (BACMs) are tailor-made bioactive mixtures containing several bioactive components that support cells' survival and induce a regenerative response in vivo by stimulating the recipient site to act as an in situ real bioreactor. Many different tissues have been used in the past for the isolation of cells, molecules, and growth factors, but the adipose tissue and its stromal vascular fraction (SVF) remains the most valuable, abundant, safe, and reliable source of regenerative components and particularly of adipose-derived stems cells (ADSCs). The role of plastic surgeons as the historical experts in all the most advanced techniques for harvesting, manipulating, and grafting adipose tissue is fundamental in this constant process of expansion of regenerative procedures. In this article, we analyze the main causes of cell death and the strategies for preventing it, and we present all the technical steps for preparing the main components of BACMs and the different mixing modalities to obtain the most efficient regenerative action on different clinical and pathological conditions. The second section of this work is dedicated to the logical and sequential evolution from simple bioactive composite grafts (BACGs) that distinguished our initial approach to regenerative medicine, to BACTs where many other fundamental technical steps are analyzed and integrated for supporting and enhancing the most efficient regenerative activity. Level of Evidence: Not gradable.

Autologous Fat Transplantation for Aesthetic Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Autologous fat transplantation has already become a part of clinical practice for aesthetic breast augmentation even though evidence regarding its efficacy is still lacking.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to determine the current worldwide status and efficacy, techniques, and oncologic safety on this subject.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify all relevant studies.

RESULTS

Eighty-four articles published between 1987 and April 2020, consisting of 6468 patients, were included, and 64 studies consisting of 5162 unique patients were included in the meta-analysis. Most studies had a low level of evidence (levels 2b-5); In this meta-analysis, there were 17 prospective cohort studies, 4 retrospective cohort studies, 6 case-control studies, and 38 case series. The publications were from 21 countries. Indications for autologous fat transplantation were aesthetic augmentation (93.2%) and congenital malformation (6.8%). Among the 5162 patients, 2 cases (0.04%) of cancer were reported. The meta-analysis revealed very high overall patient and surgeon satisfaction rates of 93% and 87%, respectively. Overall, only 1.56 sessions were needed to achieve the desired result. Long-term survival was calculated to be approximately 60% to 70% at 1-year follow-up. Only 8% of procedures resulted in clinical complications, and 5% of patients required biopsy because of abnormal clinical or radiological findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Autologous fat transplantation seems to be a major tool in aesthetic breast augmentation. Preoperative patient selection is essential but under-reported. Future research should focus on evaluating the technical and patient factors influencing the rate of fat survival and its oncological safety.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Evaluation of a new adipose tissue processing method for breast and buttock fat grafting procedures

Background

There is still some debate about the best adipose processing method for autologous fat transfer procedures. This article reports a series of 66 fat grafting procedures using a novel fat processing technique that involves washing, “micronization,” and decantation.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the files of all patients operated on over a 2-year period by the two investigators. They underwent breast or buttock surgery that employed the novel fat processing technique for fat transfer. Complications and patient satisfaction were recorded, and fat resorption was qualitatively assessed based on clinical examination and photographs.

Results

Data were retrieved from a total of 66 procedures performed on 43 patients: 17 breast augmentations, 8 buttock augmentations, and 41 breast reconstructions. Five patients also underwent concomitant facial fat grafting. The complications were one case of transient liponecrotic cyst in the breast, one case of transient areolar sensitivity reduction, and two cases of infection. The infections were reported in patients from the breast reconstruction cohort who had a history of radiotherapy. There was no complication associated with facial fat grafting. Patient satisfaction was achieved in 82.4 to 92.5% of cases depending on the study cohort. Fat resorption was graded as minimal to moderate in 95% of all cases.

Conclusions

This retrospective study supports the safety and effectiveness of this novel fat processing method in breast and buttock surgeries. Further controlled studies are needed to compare its performance with that of other techniques.

Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study

32 Years of Ultrasonic-Assisted Lipoplasty (U.A.L.): From Aesthetic to Obesity

In this article, we tried to take stock of the state of the art in ultrasonic-assisted lipoplasty focusing on its most recent technologic advances and in the newest clinical applications, such as overweight, obesity, breast surgery and regenerative medicine. Great space was devoted to the analysis and clarification of the most common myths and legends related to this intriguing technique.

Complications after Breast Augmentation with Fat Grafting: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Breast augmentation with fat grafting is used as an alternative to breast implants. However, a systematic evaluation of the complication rates after fat grafting using only studies with consecutive patients has not previously been performed. In this study, the authors compiled studies reporting complication rates and radiologic changes in consecutive patients undergoing cosmetic breast augmentation with fat grafting.

METHODS

Studies reporting on consecutive patients undergoing breast augmentation with fat grafting were included. Complication rates, radiologic changes, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System assessments, and the number of patients undergoing revision surgery were extracted. Mean complication rates and radiologic changes were calculated with meta-analytical methods.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies with 2073 patients were included. The rates of major complications were low (hematoma, 0.5 percent; infection, 0.6 percent; and seroma, 0.1 percent). None of these patients needed revision surgery. The most frequent minor complication was palpable cysts in 2.0 percent of the patients; 67 percent of these were treated with aspiration. The radiologic changes in the patients after fat grafting were as follows: oil cysts, 6.5 percent; calcifications, 4.5 percent; and fat necrosis, 1.2 percent. The risk of being referred for additional radiologic imaging (e.g., to exclude malignant changes) was 16.4 percent, and the risk of being referred for biopsy was 3.2 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

The complication rates after breast augmentation with fat grafting are low and support fat grafting as an alternative to breast augmentation with implants. The rates of radiologic changes are high after fat grafting, but the changes do not seem to have any therapeutic consequences for the patients.