Genetic Code Error Minimization as a Non-Adaptive But Beneficial Trait

Ordering events in a developing genetic code

Preexisting partial genetic codes can fuse to evolve towards the complete Standard Genetic Code (SGC). Such code fusion provides a path of 'least selection', readily generating precursor codes that resemble the SGC. Consequently, such least selections produce the SGC via minimal, thus rapid, change. Optimal code evolution therefore requires delayed wobble. Early wobble encoding slows code evolution, very specifically diminishing the most likely SGC precursors: near-complete, accurate codes which are the products of code fusions. In contrast: given delayed wobble, the SGC can emerge from a truncation selection/evolutionary radiation based on proficient fused coding.

The error minimization of the genetic code would have been determined by natural selection and not by a neutral evolution

I discuss the mechanisms by which the error minimization observed in the genetic code would have been produced; that is, the ability of the genetic code to buffer, for example, the deleterious effects of translation errors. Here, I analyse whether the error minimization was produced by the intervention of natural selection or whether it is an emergent, that is, neutral property; in other words, whether it is a by-product of another mechanism that was structuring the genetic code. In particular, I criticize Massey's simulations (2008) - favouring the neutral hypothesis - which, containing elements of natural selection, would render his conclusions at least partly tautological. Furthermore, I criticize some of Koonin's (2017) interpretations regarding Massey's simulations. Finally, I criticize the opinion of Janzen et al. (2022) according to which their self-aminoacylating ribozyme system would have been capable of generating an error minimization of the genetic code as its emergent property. That is to say, I criticize, more generally, a neutral origin of error minimization. Indeed, any mechanism for structuring the genetic code would be capable of generating, in theory, such an emergent property. The problem is that to demonstrate this, it would be necessary to show that the level of optimization achieved by the genetic code would be that expected under the neutral hypothesis, the one that Janzen et al. (2022) instead they did not make. Therefore, their view is only a hypothesis and is very far from being corroborated by their results. Instead, in the literature there is a strong evidence that the level of optimization achieved by the genetic code is so high that it would imply, per se, an intervention of natural selection in the origin of error minimization of the genetic code. On the other hand, this level of optimization would be very far from what might have been produced by a neutral process.

Optimal Evolution of the Standard Genetic Code

The Standard Genetic Code (SGC) exists in every known organism on Earth. SGC evolution via early unique codon assignment, then later wobble, yields coding resembling the near-universal code. Below, later wobble is shown to also create an optimal route to accurate codon assignment. Time of optimal codon assignment matches the previously defined mean time for ordered coding, exhibiting ≥ 90% of SGC order. Accurate evolution is also accessible, sufficiently frequent to appear in populations of 10³ to 10⁴ codes. SGC-like coding capacity, code order, and accurate assignments therefore arise together, in one attainable evolutionary intermediate. Examples, which plausibly resemble coding at evolutionary domain separation, are characterized.

Evolution of the Standard Genetic Code

A near-universal Standard Genetic Code (SGC) implies a single origin for present Earth life. To study this unique event, I compute paths to the SGC, comparing different plausible histories. Notably, SGC-like coding emerges from traditional evolutionary mechanisms, and a superior route can be identified. To objectively measure evolution, progress values from 0 (random coding) to 1 (SGC-like) are defined: these measure fractions of random-code-to-SGC distance. Progress types are spacing/distance/delta Polar Requirement, detecting space between identical assignments/mutational distance to the SGC/chemical order, respectively. The coding system is based on selected RNAs performing aminoacyl-RNA synthetase reactions. Acceptor RNAs exhibit SGC-like Crick wobble; alternatively, non-wobbling triplets uniquely encode 20 amino acids/start/stop. Triplets acquire 22 functions by stereochemistry, selection, coevolution, or at random. Assignments also propagate to an assigned triplet’s neighborhood via single mutations, but can also decay. A vast code universe makes futile evolutionary paths plentiful. Thus, SGC evolution is critically sensitive to disorder from random assignments. Evolution also inevitably slows near coding completion. The SGC likely avoided these difficulties, and two suitable paths are compared. In late wobble, a majority of non-wobble assignments are made before wobble is adopted. In continuous wobble, a uniquely advantageous early intermediate yields an ordered SGC. Revised coding evolution (limited randomness, late wobble, concentration on amino acid encoding, chemically conservative coevolution with a chemically ordered elite) produces varied full codes with excellent joint progress values. A population of only 600 independent coding tables includes SGC-like members; a Bayesian path toward more accurate SGC evolution is available.