Skip metastases in high-grade intramedullary appendicular osteosarcoma: an indicator of more aggressive disease?

The Role of Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing Extrapulmonary Metastases in Osteosarcoma Staging and Restaging: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to investigate the role of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in assessing extrapulmonary metastases in primary osteosarcoma staging.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical data to identify primary osteosarcoma patients with available preoperative whole-body MRI obtained in the staging or restaging. Histopathology was the reference test for assessing the diagnostic performance, if available. Otherwise, oncology board decisions were used as the reference. In addition, the benefits of whole-body MRI to F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT) and bone scintigraphy were investigated.

RESULTS

In all, 36 patients with osteosarcoma (24 staging, 12 restaging) with a mean age of 16.36 ± 5.63 years (range, 9-29 years) were included in the study. The median follow-up duration was 26.61 months (interquartile range, 33.3 months). Of 36 patients, 8 had skeletal, 1 had a lymph node, and 1 had a subcutaneous metastasis. Whole-body MRI correctly identified all patients with metastatic disease but incorrectly classified a bone infarct in one patient as a skeletal metastasis, equating a scan-level sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of 100%, 96.3%, 97.3%, 100%, and 90.91%. Whole-body MRI contributed to bone scintigraphy by identifying a skeletal metastasis in one patient and positron emission tomography-computed tomography by ruling out a skeletal metastasis in another.

CONCLUSIONS

Whole-body MRI could accurately identify extrapulmonary metastases in primary osteosarcoma patients for staging or restaging. In addition, it might contribute to the standard whole-body imaging methods.

Skip metastases in appendicular Ewing sarcoma: relationship to distant metastases at diagnosis, chemotherapy response and overall survival

OBJECTIVE

To identify in appendicular Ewing sarcoma (ES), if skip metastases (SM) are associated with distant metastases at presentation, response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and overall outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Patients with appendicular ES from 2007 to 2021 who had whole-bone MRI to identify SM were included in the study. Patient demographics included age/gender, bone involved, the presence of SM, longitudinal tumour length, presence of extra-osseous disease and its axial depth if present from whole-bone MRI and lung metastases and distant bone metastases from staging studies. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy from resection specimens and overall survival were noted. Comparison of these factors between patients with and without SM was undertaken.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients (66 males; 29 females: mean age 15.8 years; range 5-48 years) were included. On whole-bone MRI, 80 (84.2%) patients had no SM and 15 (15.8%) patients had one or more SM. Of patients without a SM, lung metastases were present in 16 (21%), distant bone metastases in 7 (11%), while 51 (75%) had a good response to chemotherapy compared with 7 (50%), 3 (27%), and 10 (77%), respectively, in patients with a SM. SM were significantly associated with lung metastases (p = 0.02), but not with distant skeletal metastases (p = 0.13), chemotherapy response (p = 0.88), tumour length (p = 0.47), presence of (p = 0.15) or axial depth of extra-osseous disease (p = 0.4). SM were associated with a significantly poorer survival (p = 0.007) and three times greater risk of death during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In appendicular ES, the identification of a SM is associated with the presence of lung metastases at presentation and poorer survival.

Metastatic Progression of Osteosarcomas: A Review of Current Knowledge of Environmental versus Oncogenic Drivers

Simple Summary

Osteosarcomas are heterogeneous bone tumors with complex genetic and chromosomic alterations. The numerous patients with metastatic osteosarcoma have a very poor prognosis, and only those who can have full surgical resection of the primary tumor and of all the macro metastasis can survive. Despite the recent improvements in prediction and early detection of metastasis, big efforts are still required to understand the specific mechanisms of osteosarcoma metastatic progression, in order to reveal novel therapeutic targets.

Abstract

Metastases of osteosarcomas are heterogeneous. They may grow simultaneously with the primary tumor, during treatment or shortly after, or a long time after the end of the treatment. They occur mainly in lungs but also in bone and various soft tissues. They can have the same histology as the primary tumor or show a shift towards a different differentiation path. However, the metastatic capacities of osteosarcoma cells can be predicted by gene and microRNA signatures. Despite the identification of numerous metastasis-promoting/predicting factors, there is no efficient therapeutic strategy to reduce the number of patients developing a metastatic disease or to cure these metastatic patients, except surgery. Indeed, these patients are generally resistant to the classical chemo- and to immuno-therapy. Hence, the knowledge of specific mechanisms should be extended to reveal novel therapeutic approaches. Recent studies that used DNA and RNA sequencing technologies highlighted complex relations between primary and secondary tumors. The reported results also supported a hierarchical organization of the tumor cell clones, suggesting that cancer stem cells are involved. Because of their chemoresistance, their plasticity, and their ability to modulate the immune environment, the osteosarcoma stem cells could be important players in the metastatic process.