Subacute haematotoxicity after PRRT with (177)Lu-DOTA-octreotate: prognostic factors, incidence and course

Elevated Baseline Mean Corpuscular Volume Predicts the Development of Severe Hematologic Toxicity After 177Lu-DOTATATE Therapy

177Lu-DOTATATE is an effective second-line treatment for metastatic or nonresectable neuroendocrine tumors. This treatment can result in hematologic severe adverse reactions (SARs). Preemptive identification of patients at risk of SARs could mitigate this risk and improve treatment safety and outcomes. Methods: Demographic and oncologic history, pretreatment laboratory values, and SAR frequency were obtained for 126 sequential patients treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models identified factors correlating with SARs. Results: Relative pretreatment anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated mean corpuscular volume (MCV) were significantly correlated with SARs, with an odds ratio of 16 (95% CI, 5-65) in patients with an MCV greater than 95 fL. Conclusion: Pretreatment bone marrow dyscrasias, including an MCV greater than 95 fL, may predict patients at risk for SARs when treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE. Further study is needed to determine whether the risks of SARs outweigh the benefit in these patients.

177 Lu-DOTATATE PRRT Safety and Organ-at-Risk Dosimetry in Patients With Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors : Data From the Prospective Phase 2 LUMEN Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the association among toxicity, dosimetry of organs-at-risk, and disease progression in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with 177 Lu-DOTATATE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with GEP-NETs underwent 177 Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in a single-arm, prospective, phase 2 study, where patients were followed up with blood tests, isotopic glomerular filtration rate (iGFR), and imaging examinations (CT/MRI and PET) every 6 months until disease progression. Adverse events (AEs) graded per CTCAEv4.03 and occurring during treatment were collected and followed up until resolution. Dosimetry, including biologically effective doses (BEDs) to kidneys, BED to bone marrow, and absorbed dose (AD) to spleen, was performed after each PRRT cycle. Statistical analyses explored associations among dosimetry, toxicity, and patient progression free-survival.

RESULTS

The most common AEs were anemia and lymphopenia (65%), followed by thrombocytopenia and fatigue (each 51%), alopecia (46%), and nausea (41%). The most common grade ≥3 AE was lymphopenia (43%). There was no grade ≥3 nephrotoxicity. The median iGFR % decrease was 11% ( P < 0.001), at a median follow-up of 23 months. iGFR %decrease and renal BED did not correlate (Spearman ρ = -0.09). Similarly, no significant association was found between bone marrow BED or spleen AD and the grades of hematological toxicities. We observed no association between progression free-survival and either the decline of renal function or the occurrence of hematological toxicities during PRRT.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the safety profile of 177 Lu-DOTATATE PRRT in patients with GEP-NETs irrespective of the dosimetry of organs at risk. Kidney, bone marrow, and spleen dosimetry measures were not associated with renal or hematological toxicity.

The heterobivalent (SSTR2/albumin) radioligand [67Cu]Cu-NODAGA-cLAB4-TATE enables efficient somatostatin receptor radionuclide theranostics

Somatostatin type 2 receptor (SSTR2) radionuclide therapy using β- particle-emitting radioligands has entered clinical practice for the treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Despite the initial success of [177Lu]Lu‑DOTA-TATE, theranostic SSTR2 radioligands require improved pharmacokinetics and enhanced compatibility with alternative radionuclides. Consequently, this study evaluates the pharmacokinetic effects of the albumin-binding domain cLAB4 on theranostic performance of copper‑67-labeled NODAGA-TATE variants in an SSTR2-positive mouse pheochromocytoma (MPC) model. Methods: Binding, uptake, and release of radioligands as well as growth-inhibiting effects were characterized in cells grown as monolayers and spheroids. Tissue pharmacokinetics, absorbed tumor doses, and projected human organ doses were determined from quantitative SPECT imaging in a subcutaneous tumor allograft mouse model. Treatment effects on tumor growth, leukocyte numbers, and renal albumin excretion were assessed. Results: Both copper‑64- and copper‑67-labeled versions of NODAGA-TATE and NODAGA-cLAB4‑TATE showed similar SSTR2 binding affinity, but faster release from tumor cells compared to the clinical reference [177Lu]Lu‑DOTA-TATE. The bifunctional SSTR2/albumin-binding radioligand [67Cu]Cu‑NODAGA-cLAB4‑TATE showed both an improved uptake and prolonged residence time in tumors resulting in equivalent treatment efficacy to [177Lu]Lu‑DOTA-TATE. Absorbed doses were well tolerated in terms of leukocyte counts and kidney function. Conclusion: This preclinical study demonstrates therapeutic efficacy of [67Cu]Cu‑NODAGA-cLAB4‑TATE in SSTR2-positive tumors. As an intrinsic radionuclide theranostic agent, the radioligand provides stable radiocopper complexes and high sensitivity in SPECT imaging for prospective determination and monitoring of therapeutic doses in vivo. Beyond that, copper‑64- and copper‑61-labeled versions offer possibilities for pre- and post-therapeutic PET. Therefore, NODAGA-cLAB4-TATE has the potential to advance clinical use of radiocopper in SSTR2-targeted cancer theranostics.

Comparison of the tolerability of 161Tb- and 177Lu-labeled somatostatin analogues in the preclinical setting

PURPOSE

[177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE is an established somatostatin receptor (SSTR) agonist for the treatment of metastasized neuroendocrine neoplasms, while the SSTR antagonist [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-LM3 has only scarcely been employed in clinics. Impressive preclinical data obtained with [161Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 in tumor-bearing mice indicated the potential of terbium-161 as an alternative to lutetium-177. The aim of the present study was to compare the tolerability of 161Tb- and 177Lu-based DOTA-LM3 and DOTATATE in immunocompetent mice.

METHODS

Dosimetry calculations were performed based on biodistribution data of the radiopeptides in immunocompetent mice. Treatment-related effects on blood cell counts were assessed on Days 10, 28 and 56 after application of [161Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 or [161Tb]Tb-DOTATATE at 20 MBq per mouse. These radiopeptides were also applied at 100 MBq per mouse and the effects compared to those observed after application of the 177Lu-labeled counterparts. Bone marrow smears, blood plasma parameters and organ histology were assessed at the end of the study.

RESULTS

The absorbed organ dose was commonly higher for the SSTR antagonist than for the SSTR agonist and for terbium-161 over lutetium-177. Application of a therapeutic activity level of 20 MBq [161Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 or [161Tb]Tb-DOTATATE was well tolerated without major hematological changes. The injection of 100 MBq of the 161Tb- and 177Lu-based somatostatin analogues affected the blood cell counts, however. The lymphocytes were 40-50% lower in treated mice compared to the untreated controls on Day 10 irrespective of the radionuclide employed. At the same timepoint, thrombocyte and erythrocyte counts were 30-50% and 6-12% lower, respectively, after administration of the SSTR antagonist (p < 0.05) while changes were less pronounced in mice injected with the SSTR agonist. All blood cell counts were in the normal range on Day 56. Histological analyses revealed minimal abnormalities in the kidneys, liver and spleen of treated mice. No correlation was observed between the organ dose and frequency of the occurrence of abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

Hematologic changes were more pronounced in mice treated with the SSTR antagonist than in those treated with the SSTR agonist. Despite the increased absorbed dose delivered by terbium-161 over lutetium-177, [161Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 and [161Tb]Tb-DOTATATE should be safe at activity levels that are recommended for their respective 177Lu-based analogues.

A review of 177Lu dosimetry workflows: how to reduce the imaging workloads?

177 Lu radiopharmaceutical therapy is a standardized systemic treatment, with a typical dose of 7.4 GBq per injection, but its response varies from patient to patient. Dosimetry provides the opportunity to personalize treatment, but it requires multiple post-injection images to monitor the radiopharmaceutical's biodistribution over time. This imposes an additional imaging burden on centers with limited resources. This review explores methods to lessen this burden by optimizing acquisition types and minimizing the number and duration of imaging sessions. After summarizing the different steps of dosimetry and providing examples of dosimetric workflows for177 Lu -DOTATATE and177 Lu -PSMA, we examine dosimetric workflows based on a reduced number of acquisitions, or even just one. We provide a non-exhaustive description of simplified methods and their assumptions, as well as their limitations. Next, we detail the specificities of each normal tissue and tumors, before reviewing dose-response relationships in the literature. In conclusion, we will discuss the current limitations of dosimetric workflows and propose avenues for improvement.

Future Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in Bone Marrow Dosimetry and Individualized Radioligand Therapy

Radioligand therapy is an emerging and effective treatment option for various types of malignancies, but may be intricately linked to hematological side effects such as anemia, lymphopenia or thrombocytopenia. The safety and efficacy of novel theranostic agents, targeting increasingly complex targets, can be well served by comprehensive dosimetry. However, optimization in patient management and patient selection based on risk-factors predicting adverse events and built upon reliable dose-response relations is still an open demand. In this context, artificial intelligence methods, especially machine learning and deep learning algorithms, may play a crucial role. This review provides an overview of upcoming opportunities for integrating artificial intelligence methods into the field of dosimetry in nuclear medicine by improving bone marrow and blood dosimetry accuracy, enabling early identification of potential hematological risk-factors, and allowing for adaptive treatment planning. It will further exemplify inspirational success stories from neighboring disciplines that may be translated to nuclear medicine practices, and will provide conceptual suggestions for future directions. In the future, we expect artificial intelligence-assisted (predictive) dosimetry combined with clinical parameters to pave the way towards truly personalized theranostics in radioligand therapy.

Absorbed Dose-Response Relationship in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE: One Step Closer to Personalized Medicine

[177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE has been approved for progressive and inoperable gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) that overexpress somatostatin receptors. The absorbed doses by limiting organs and tumors can be quantified by serial postinfusion scintigraphy measurements of the γ-emissions from 177Lu. The objective of this work was to explore how postinfusion [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE dosimetry could influence clinical management by predicting treatment efficacy (tumor shrinkage and survival) and toxicity. Methods: Patients with GEP-NETs treated with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE between 2016 and 2022 and who underwent dosimetry were included. Absorbed doses were calculated for healthy organs (liver, kidneys, bone marrow, and spleen) and tumors using PLANET Dose and the local energy deposition method based on serial posttreatment SPECT/CT. Up to 5 lesions per site were selected and measured on images collected at baseline and 3 mo after treatment end (measurement masked to the somatostatin receptor imaging uptake). For toxicity assessment, laboratory parameters were regularly monitored. Clinical data, including time to death or progression, were collected from the patients' health records. Correlations between absorbed doses by organs and toxicity and between absorbed doses by lesions and tumor volume variation were studied using regression models. Results: In total, 35 dosimetric studies were performed in patients with mostly grade 2 (77%) tumors and metastases in liver (89%), lymph nodes (77%), and bone (34%), and 146 lesions were analyzed: 1-9 lesions per patient, mostly liver metastases (65%) and lymph nodes (25%). The median total absorbed dose by tumors was 94.4 Gy. The absorbed doses by tumors significantly decreased between cycles. The absorbed dose by tumors was significantly associated with tumor volume variation (P < 0.001) 3 mo after treatment end, and it was a significant prognostic factor for survival. Toxicity analysis showed a correlation between the decrease of hematologic parameters such as lymphocytes or platelet concentrations and the absorbed doses by the spleen or bone marrow. The mean absorbed dose by the kidneys was not correlated with nephrotoxicity during the studied period. Conclusion: In patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE for GEP-NETs, tumor and healthy organ dosimetry can predict survival and toxicities, thus influencing clinical management.

Short-Term Biological Toxicity Prediction of [177Lu]Lutetium-Oxodotreotide: An Original Retrospective Analysis

Introduction: [177Lu]Lutetium (Lu)-oxodotreotide is a radiopharmaceutical drug used as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for somatostatin receptor-expressing neuroendocrine neoplasms. It provides an additional effective alternative treatment for these rare cancers. Although well tolerated, its safety profile must continue to be characterized to support its use as a first-line treatment or for additional cycles. This study evaluated factors associated with the occurrence of [177Lu]Lu-oxodotreotide induced short-term toxicity. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational monocentric study was carried out from July 2013 to October 2021. Inclusion criteria were defined as follows: patients who received at least four cycles of [177Lu]Lu-oxodotreotide and were followed up for 6 months after the last injection. Graduated toxicity was defined using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 5.0. Cox regression was used in the analysis. Results: Forty patients were included. The most frequent toxicities occurred during the first cycle and were graded as G1 or G2. As expected, toxicities were predominantly hematological and hepatic, with incomplete reversibility after each cycle. The following factors were significantly related to the occurrence of hematological or hepatic toxicity during PRRT: gastrointestinal primary tumor diagnosis, bone metastases, peritoneal metastases, pancreatic metastases or pulmonary metastases, and high tumor grade. Conclusion: Knowledge and consideration of these factors in adjusting [177Lu]Lu-oxodotreotide treatment regimen could help prevent or reduce the severity of these toxicities. Further studies are still warranted to refine these results and improve treatment management.

Long-term clinical outcomes of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors

The incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors has been rising and these tumors are usually only diagnosed at a metastatic stage. Present first line treatments include somatostatin analogs, targeted therapies and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. The Lutetium-177 [177Lu] based radiotracer [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE has only been approved as first-line treatment of metastatic midgut NETs however its efficacy as a third line or above treatment in patients with non ileal primaries has not been tested. In our study, we identified 25 patients with histologically confirmed well-differentiated metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and administered [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE as a second line, third line and fourth line treatment. Our study demonstrated a notable response in patients with non-ileal primaries and heavily pretreated disease, warranting further studies for additional cycles of treatment.

SPECT/CT Image-Derived Absorbed Dose to Red Marrow Correlates with Hematologic Toxicity in Patients Treated with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE

Hematologic toxicity, although often transient, is the most common limiting adverse effect during somatostatin peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. This study investigated the association between Monte Carlo-derived absorbed dose to the red marrow (RM) and hematologic toxicity in patients being treated for their neuroendocrine tumors. Methods: Twenty patients each receiving 4 treatment cycles of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE were included. Multiple-time-point 177Lu SPECT/CT imaging-based RM dosimetry was performed using an artificial intelligence-driven workflow to segment vertebral spongiosa within the field of view (FOV). This workflow was coupled with an in-house macroscale/microscale Monte Carlo code that incorporates a spongiosa microstructure model. Absorbed dose estimates to RM in lumbar and thoracic vertebrae within the FOV, considered as representations of the whole-body RM absorbed dose, were correlated with hematologic toxicity markers at about 8 wk after each cycle and at 3- and 6-mo follow-up after completion of all cycles. Results: The median of absorbed dose to RM in lumbar and thoracic vertebrae within the FOV (D median,vertebrae) ranged from 0.019 to 0.11 Gy/GBq. The median of cumulative absorbed dose across all 4 cycles was 1.3 Gy (range, 0.6-2.5 Gy). Hematologic toxicity was generally mild, with no grade 2 or higher toxicity for platelets, neutrophils, or hemoglobin. However, there was a decline in blood counts over time, with a fractional value relative to baseline at 6 mo of 74%, 97%, 57%, and 97%, for platelets, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and hemoglobin, respectively. Statistically significant correlations were found between a subset of hematologic toxicity markers and RM absorbed doses, both during treatment and at 3- and 6-mo follow-up. This included a correlation between the platelet count relative to baseline at 6-mo follow up: D median,vertebrae (r = -0.64, P = 0.015), D median,lumbar (r = -0.72, P = 0.0038), D median,thoracic (r = -0.58, P = 0.029), and D average,vertebrae (r = -0.66, P = 0.010), where D median,lumbar and D median,thoracic are median absorbed dose to the RM in the lumbar and thoracic vertebrae, respectively, within the FOV and D average,vertebrae is the mass-weighted average absorbed dose of all vertebrae. Conclusion: This study found a significant correlation between image-derived absorbed dose to the RM and hematologic toxicity, including a relative reduction of platelets at 6-mo follow up. These findings indicate that absorbed dose to the RM can potentially be used to understand and manage hematologic toxicity in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Impact of different models based on blood samples and images for bone marrow dosimetry after 177Lu-labeled somatostatin-receptor therapy

BACKGROUND

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE is a recognized option for treating neuroendocrine tumors and has few toxicities, except for the kidneys and bone marrow. The bone marrow dose is generally derived from a SPECT/CT image-based method with four timepoints or from a blood-based method with up to 9 timepoints, but there is still no reference method. This retrospective single-center study on the same cohort of patients compared the calculated bone marrow dose administered with both methods using mono, bi- or tri-exponential models. For the image-based method, the dose was estimated using Planetdose© software. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated. We also studied the impact of late timepoints for both methods.

RESULTS

The bone marrow dose was calculated for 131 treatments with the blood-based method and for 17 with the image-based method. In the former, the median absorbed dose was 15.3, 20.5 and 28.3 mGy/GBq with the mono-, bi- and tri-exponential model, respectively. With the image-based method, the median absorbed dose was 63.9, 41.9 and 60.8 with the mono-, bi- and tri-exponential model, respectively. Blood samples after 24h post-injection did not evidence any change in the absorbed bone marrow dose with the bi-exponential model. On the contrary, the 6-day post-injection timepoint was more informative with the image-based model.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that the estimated bone marrow dose is significantly lower with the blood-based method than with the image-based method. The blood-based method with a bi-exponential model proved particularly useful, without the need for blood samples after 24h post-injection. Nevertheless, this blood-based method is based on an assumption that needs to be more validated. The important difference between the two methods does not allow to determine the optimal one to estimate the true absorbed dose and further studies are necessary to compare with biological effects.

Efficacy and tolerability of somatostatin analogues according to gender in patients with neuroendocrine tumors

As the incidence of neuroendocrine tumors has been rising, gender differences in epidemiology and clinical behavior have emerged, and interest into a gender-driven management of these tumors has grown with the aim to improve survival and quality of life of these patients. Somatostatin Analogues represent the first line of systemic treatment of both functional and non-functional neuroendocrine tumors, through the expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) in the tumor cells, and proved effective in controlling hormonal hypersecretion and inhibiting tumor growth, improving progression-free survival and overall survival of these patients. Aim of the present review is to investigate any differences by gender in efficacy and safety of SSTS-targeted therapies, that represent the mainstay treatment of neuroendocrine tumors, as they emerge from studies of varying design and intent. Although preclinical studies have provided evidence in favor of differences by gender in tumor expression of SSTR, as well as of the role of sex hormones and related receptors in modulating SSTRs expression and function, the clinical studies conducted so far have not shown substantial differences between males and females in either efficacy or toxicity of SSTR-targeted therapies, even if with sometimes inconsistent results. Moreover, in most studies gender was not a predictor of response to treatment. Studies specifically designed to address this issue are needed to develop gender-specific therapeutic algorithms, improving patients' prognosis and quality of life.

Pre-clinical evaluation of biomarkers for the early detection of nephrotoxicity following alpha-particle radioligand therapy

PURPOSE

Cancer treatment with alpha-emitter-based radioligand therapies (α-RLTs) demonstrates promising tumor responses. Radiolabeled peptides are filtered through glomeruli, followed by potential reabsorption of a fraction by proximal tubules, which may cause acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Because tubular cells are considered the primary site of radiopeptides' renal reabsorption and potential injury, the current use of kidney biomarkers of glomerular functional loss limits the evaluation of possible nephrotoxicity and its early detection. This study aimed to investigate whether urinary secretion of tubular injury biomarkers could be used as an additional non-invasive sensitive diagnostic tool to identify unrecognizable tubular damage and risk of long-term α-RLT nephrotoxicity.

METHODS

A bifunctional cyclic peptide, melanocortin 1 ligand (MC1L), labeled with [203Pb]Pb-MC1L, was used for [212Pb]Pb-MC1L biodistribution and absorbed dose measurements in CD-1 Elite mice. Mice were treated with [212Pb]Pb-MC1L in a dose-escalation study up to levels of radioactivity intended to induce kidney injury. The approach enabled prospective kidney functional and injury biomarker evaluation and late kidney histological analysis to validate these biomarkers.

RESULTS

Biodistribution analysis identified [212Pb]Pb-MC1L reabsorption in kidneys with a dose deposition of 2.8, 8.9, and 20 Gy for 0.9, 3.0, and 6.7 MBq injected [212Pb]Pb-MC1L doses, respectively. As expected, mice receiving 6.7 MBq had significant weight loss and CKD evidence based on serum creatinine, cystatin C, and kidney histological alterations 28 weeks after treatment. A dose-dependent urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL, tubular injury biomarker) urinary excretion the day after [212Pb]Pb-MC1L treatment highly correlated with the severity of late tubulointerstitial injury and histological findings.

CONCLUSION

Urine NGAL secretion could be a potential early diagnostic tool to identify unrecognized tubular damage and predict long-term α-RLT-related nephrotoxicity.

Treatment and Long-Term Safety Outcomes of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: An Asian Experience

PURPOSE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a targeted molecular therapy used to treat neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). It has been shown to be effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic NETs in several centres in the USA, Europe, and Australia. Tolerability and efficacy data emerging from Asian centres remain few. Epidemiological evidence suggests that there are differences in neuroendocrine neoplasms between the population groups. We aim to describe the treatment and safety outcomes of PRRT in the Asian population.

METHODS

One hundred and seven (107) patients with metastatic NETs who had undergone PRRT treatment from January 2012 to March 2019 were included in this retrospective study. The response rates using RECIST 1.1 and qualitative analysis were examined. The overall and progression-free survival curves were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival was 49 months. Response assessment after completion of treatment showed that 33 (37.9%) of 87 patients had partial or complete response. Subgroup analysis comparing high- and low-grade NET showed that there was a significant difference in the time to progression curves. Comparison of the number of cycles and progression-free and overall survival also showed a significant difference. Ten patients (9%) had grade 3 or more haematological toxicities. Four patients (4%) had grade 3/4 hepatobiliary toxicities, although the presence of extensive liver metastases was a confounding factor. None of the patients had grade 3/4 acute kidney injury.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that PRRT is safe and effective in the treatment of metastatic NET in the Asian population. There was a significant difference in the progression-free survival curves between low-grade and high-grade NET and in the progression-free and overall survival comparing the number of cycles received.

Risk of treatment-altering haematological toxicity and its dependence on bone marrow doses in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

BACKGROUND

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is effective in treating neuroendocrine tumours, but treatment may be limited by kidney and bone marrow toxicity. In this work, the absorbed dose burden to the bone marrow was estimated using image-based dosimetry and its potential use for predicting treatment-altering toxicity was studied. Peripheral blood samples taken before and after 229 treatments with 177Lu-DOTATATE in 59 patients were studied. In connection to the treatments, a total of 940 blood sample occasions provided data on white blood cell, neutrophil granulocyte, platelet, erythrocyte and haemoglobin concentrations. SPECT/CT image data were collected at two or three time points after each treatment. Absorbed doses to bone marrow were calculated from the activity concentration in a metastasis-free lumbar vertebra. The rate of delayed and aborted treatments was analysed based on medical records.

RESULTS

The average absorbed dose to the bone marrow was 0.42 Gy (median 0.33 Gy, SD 0.27 Gy) per treatment. Dose-response relationships between white blood cells, neutrophil granulocytes and haemoglobin concentrations were observed, most prominently at 31-45 days after each treatment. The correlations were stronger in patients with skeletal metastases. The rates of haematological toxicity-related delays and aborted treatments were 6% and 12%, respectively. None of the studied bone marrow dosimetric parameters could clearly predict treatment-related toxicity. However, patients with skeletal metastases had higher risk of treatment-altering toxicity (odds ratio = 6.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment-altering haematological toxicity in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is relatively rare and appears difficult to fully predict from post-therapeutic image-based dosimetry. However, for patients with skeletal metastases, the haematological dose-response relationships are stronger. Future studies may focus on this patient group, to further investigate the usefulness of dosimetry in predicting decreases in blood values.

A phase I/II study of the safety and efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in advanced somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumours

PURPOSE

We present the results of an open-label, phase I/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the novel somatostatin receptor (SSTR) antagonist [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in 40 patients with previously treated, progressive neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), in which dosimetry was used to guide maximum administered activity.

METHODS

This study was conducted in two parts. Part A consisted of 15 patients who completed three cycles of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan at a fixed administered activity and peptide amount per cycle (4.5 GBq/300 µg). Part B, which included 25 patients who received one to five cycles of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan, evaluated different administered activities (4.5 or 6.0 GBq/cycle) and peptide amounts (300, 700, or 1300 μg/cycle), limited to a cumulative absorbed radiation dose of 23 Gy to the kidneys and 1.5 Gy to the bone marrow.

RESULTS

Median cumulative administered activity of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan was 13.0 GBq over three cycles (13.1 GBq in part A and 12.9 GBq in part B). Overall, 17 (42.5%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment‑related adverse events; the most common were lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. No grade 3/4 nephrotoxicity was observed. Two patients developed myeloid neoplasms considered treatment related by the investigator. Disease control rate for part A and part B was 94.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.3-99.4), and overall response rate was 21.1% (95% CI: 9.6-37.3).

CONCLUSION

[177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan, administered at a median cumulative activity of 13.0 GBq over three cycles, has an acceptable safety profile with a promising clinical response in patients with progressive, SSTR-positive NETs. A 5-year long-term follow-up study is ongoing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02592707. Registered October 30, 2015.

Targeted radionuclide therapy in endocrine-related cancers: advances in the last decade

Targeted radionuclide therapy plays an increasingly important role in managing endocrine-related tumors and significantly advances the therapeutic landscape for patients with these diseases. With increasing FDA-approved therapies and advances in the field, come an increased knowledge of the potential for long-term toxicities associated with these therapies and the field must develop new strategies to increase potency and efficacy while individualizing the selection of patients to those most likely to respond to treatment. Novel agents and modalities of therapy are also being explored. This review will discuss the current landscape and describe the avenues for growth in the field currently being explored.

Systemic Therapy for Tumor Control in Metastatic Well-Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To develop recommendations for systemic therapy for well-differentiated grade 1 (G1) to grade 3 (G3) metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of relevant studies and develop recommendations for clinical practice.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are recommended as first-line systemic therapy for most patients with G1-grade 2 (G2) metastatic well-differentiated GI-NETs. Observation is an option for patients with low-volume or slow-growing disease without symptoms. After progression on SSAs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is recommended as systematic therapy for patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive tumors. Everolimus is an alternative second-line therapy, particularly in nonfunctioning NETs and patients with SSTR-negative tumors. SSAs are standard first-line therapy for SSTR-positive pancreatic (pan)NETs. Rarely, observation may be appropriate for asymptomatic patients until progression. Second-line systemic options for panNETs include PRRT (for SSTR-positive tumors), cytotoxic chemotherapy, everolimus, or sunitinib. For SSTR-negative tumors, first-line therapy options are chemotherapy, everolimus, or sunitinib. There are insufficient data to recommend particular sequencing of therapies. Patients with G1-G2 high-volume disease, relatively high Ki-67 index, and/or symptoms related to tumor growth may benefit from early cytotoxic chemotherapy. For G3 GEP-NETs, systemic options for G1-G2 may be considered, although cytotoxic chemotherapy is likely the most effective option for patients with tumor-related symptoms, and SSAs are relatively ineffective. Qualifying statements are provided to assist with treatment choice. Multidisciplinary team management is recommended, along with shared decision making with patients, incorporating their values and preferences, potential benefits and harms, and other characteristics and circumstances, such as comorbidities, performance status, geographic location, and access to care.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.

Replacing Lu-177 with Tb-161 in DOTA-TATE and PSMA-617 therapy: potential dosimetric implications for activity selection

AIM

To explore the dosimetric effect of substituting Lu-177 with Tb-161 in targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) using the registered tracers DOTA-TATE and PSMA-617.

METHODS

Using established kinetic data for [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, radiation absorbed doses to typical tumour lesion as well as non-target tissues ([177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE: kidneys, spleen and liver, [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617: kidneys, liver and salivary glands) were calculated for Lu-177 and Tb-161.

RESULTS

For both DOTA-TATE and PSMA-617, the substitution of Lu-177 with Tb-161 results in an increase in the delivered dose per unit of activity to tumour tissue by 40%. If an equivalent non-target delivered dose is strived for in order not to increase toxicity, based on kidney absorbed dose, 7400 MBq Lu-177 per cycle should be substituted with 5400 MBq Tb-161 for DOTA-TATE and 5300 MBq of Tb-161 for PSMA-617.

CONCLUSION

When substituting Lu-177 with Tb-161, activity conversion is necessary in order not to exceed non-target dose limits.

Pre-clinical Evaluation of Biomarkers for Early Detection of Nephrotoxicity Following Alpha-particle Radioligand Therapy

Purpose

Cancer treatment with alpha-emitter-based radioligand therapies (α-RLTs) demonstrates promising tumor responses. Radiolabeled peptides are filtered through glomeruli, followed by potential reabsorption of a fraction by proximal tubules, which may cause acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Because tubular cells are considered the primary site of radiopeptides' renal reabsorption and potential injury, the current use of kidney biomarkers of glomerular functional loss limits the evaluation of possible nephrotoxicity and its early detection. This study aimed to investigate whether urinary secretion of tubular injury biomarkers could be used as additional non-invasive sensitive diagnostic tool to identify unrecognizable tubular damage and risk of long-term α-RLTs nephrotoxicity.

Methods

A bifunctional cyclic peptide, melanocortin ligand-1(MC1L), labeled with [ 203 Pb]Pb-MC1L, was used for [ 212 Pb]Pb-MC1L biodistribution and absorbed dose measurements in CD-1 Elite mice. Mice were treated with [ 212 Pb]Pb-MC1L in a dose escalation study up to levels of radioactivity intended to induce kidney injury. The approach enabled prospective kidney functional and injury biomarker evaluation and late kidney histological analysis to validate these biomarkers.

Results

Biodistribution analysis identified [ 212 Pb]Pb-MC1L reabsorption in kidneys with a dose deposition of 2.8, 8.9, and 20 Gy for 0.9, 3.0, and 6.7 MBq injected [ 212 Pb]Pb-MC1L doses, respectively. As expected, mice receiving 6.7 MBq had significant weight loss and CKD evidence based on serum creatinine, cystatin C, and kidney histological alterations 28 weeks after treatment. A dose-dependent urinary Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL, tubular injury biomarker) urinary excretion the day after [ 212 Pb]Pb-MC1L treatment highly correlated with the severity of late tubulointerstitial injury and histological findings.

Conclusion

urine NGAL secretion could be a potential early diagnostic tool to identify unrecognized tubular damage and predict long-term α-RLT-related nephrotoxicity.

New horizon of radiopharmaceuticals in management of neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine neoplasms are rare and heterogenous group of tumors with varying degrees of clinical presentations and involvement of multiple organ systems in the body. In the modern clinical practice somatostatin receptor molecular imaging and targeted radioligand therapy plays a vital role in the diagnosis and management of the disease. Several new and promising radiotracers for NET imaging and theranostics, belonging to various groups and classes are being studied and investigated. This exponential growth of radiotracers poses concerns about the indication, clinical benefit, and safety profile of the agents. We discuss the basis behind these radiotracers clinical use, receptor targeting and intra and inter tumor heterogeneity. Furthermore, role of dual tracer imaging, combination therapy and potential applications of dosimetry in predicting treatment outcome and safety profile is reviewed. Individualized precision medicine with better tumor characterization, maximum therapeutic benefit and minimum toxicity is the way forward for future medicine.

Radiofrequency and microwave ablation controls hepatic oligoprogression of advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

In progression of multifocal liver metastases of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) escalation of systemic therapy is indicated. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the potential of local thermal ablation in hepatic oligoprogression and otherwise stable disease in GEP-NET. Patients with hepatic oligoprogression and otherwise stable disease, who underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA) for local control, were included in the study. Thermal ablation was performed while maintaining the ongoing systemic therapy or without addition of a systemic therapy. The effectiveness of this therapeutic approach was evaluated by determination of local treatment success, improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) and the safety. Seventeen thermal ablation procedures were performed in 13 patients with well differentiated NET including seven ileum NET, four pancreatic NET, one appendix NET and one rectum NET. RFA and MWA of liver metastases were well tolerated without major complications. Thermal ablation resulted in an estimated median PFS of 62.6 weeks (mean 50.5 weeks; range 10.1-78.9 weeks) per procedure. In four patients, two ablation procedures were performed throughout the course of their disease resulting in an estimated median PFS of 69.1 weeks (mean 71.6 weeks; range 10.1-123.1 weeks) per patient. Start or change of systemic therapy could be delayed up to 123.1 weeks by using thermal ablations for isolated progression of single liver metastases. 88% of thermal ablations prolonged PFS. Thermal ablation of liver metastases in a non-curative intent has the potential to provide focal growth control and to prolong PFS in GEP-NET patients with hepatic oligoprogression.

Recombinant α1-Microglobulin (rA1M) Protects against Hematopoietic and Renal Toxicity, Alone and in Combination with Amino Acids, in a 177Lu-DOTATATE Mouse Radiation Model

¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is used clinically to treat metastasized or unresectable neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Although ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE is mostly well tolerated in patients, bone marrow suppression and long-term renal toxicity are still side effects that should be considered. Amino acids are often used to minimize renal radiotoxicity, however, they are associated with nausea and vomiting in patients. α₁-microglobulin (A1M) is an antioxidant with heme- and radical-scavenging abilities. A recombinant form (rA1M) has previously been shown to be renoprotective in preclinical models, including in PRRT-induced kidney damage. Here, we further investigated rA1M's renal protective effect in a mouse ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE model in terms of administration route and dosing regimen and as a combined therapy with amino acids (Vamin). Moreover, we investigated the protective effect of rA1M on peripheral blood and bone marrow cells, as well as circulatory biomarkers. Intravenous (i.v.) administration of rA1M reduced albuminuria levels and circulatory levels of the oxidative stress-related protein fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF-21). Dual injections of rA1M (i.e., at 0 and 24 h post-¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE administration) preserved bone marrow cellularity and peripheral blood reticulocytes. Administration of Vamin, alone or in combination with rA1M, did not show any protection of bone marrow cellularity or peripheral reticulocytes. In conclusion, this study suggests that rA1M, administered i.v. for two consecutive days in conjunction with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE, may reduce hematopoietic and kidney toxicity during PRRT with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE.

Integrating Theranostics Into Patient Care Pathways: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Theranostics describes the coupling of a diagnostic biomarker and a therapeutic agent (i.e., a theranostic pair) that have a common target in tumor cells or their microenvironment. The term is increasingly associated with in vivo nuclear medicine oncologic applications that couple diagnostic imaging by means of gamma radiation with concomitant localized high-energy particulate radiation to a tissue expressing the common target. Several theranostic pairs have been translated into clinical practice in the United States and are poised to become a mainstay of cancer treatment. The purposes of this article are to review experience with theranostics for solid-organ malignancies and to address the practical integration into care pathways of β-emitting therapies that include somatostatin analogue radioligands for neuroendocrine tumors, PSMA-directed therapy for prostate cancer, and 131I-MIBG therapy for tumors of neural crest origin. Toxicities related to theranostics administration and indications for cessation of therapy in patients who experience adverse events are also discussed. A multidisciplinary team-based approach for identifying patients most likely to respond to these agents, determining the optimal time for therapy delivery, and managing patient care throughout the therapeutic course is critical to the success of a radiotheranostic program.

Optimizing the Safety and Efficacy of Bio-Radiopharmaceuticals for Cancer Therapy

The precise delivery of cytotoxic radiation to cancer cells through the combination of a specific targeting vector with a radionuclide for targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) has proven valuable for cancer care. TRT is increasingly being considered a relevant treatment method in fighting micro-metastases in the case of relapsed and disseminated disease. While antibodies were the first vectors applied in TRT, increasing research data has cited antibody fragments and peptides with superior properties and thus a growing interest in application. As further studies are completed and the need for novel radiopharmaceuticals nurtures, rigorous considerations in the design, laboratory analysis, pre-clinical evaluation, and clinical translation must be considered to ensure improved safety and effectiveness. Here, we assess the status and recent development of biological-based radiopharmaceuticals, with a focus on peptides and antibody fragments. Challenges in radiopharmaceutical design range from target selection, vector design, choice of radionuclides and associated radiochemistry. Dosimetry estimation, and the assessment of mechanisms to increase tumor uptake while reducing off-target exposure are discussed.

Disturbing the Redox Balance Using Buthionine Sulfoximine Radiosensitized Somatostatin Receptor-2 Expressing Pre-Clinical Models to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE improves the outcome of patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-expressing neuroendocrine tumours. Nevertheless, stable disease has been the main response pattern observed, with some rare complete responses. Lu-177 exerts about two-thirds of its biological effects via the indirect effects of ionizing radiation that generate reactive oxygen species, eventually leading to oxidative damage and cell death. This provides a rationale for targeting the antioxidant defence system in combination with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE. In the present study, the radiosensitizing potential and the safety of depleting glutathione (GSH) levels using buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) during ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE therapy were assessed in vitro and in vivo using a xenograft mouse model. In vitro, the combination resulted in a synergistic effect in cell lines exhibiting a BSO-mediated GSH decrease. In vivo, BSO neither influenced ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE biodistribution nor induced liver, kidney or bone marrow toxicity. In terms of efficacy, the combination resulted in reduced tumour growth and metabolic activity. Our results showed that disturbing the cell redox balance using a GSH synthesis inhibitor increased ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE efficacy without additional toxicity. Targeting the antioxidant defence system opens new safe treatment combination opportunities with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE.

The effect of long-acting somatostatin analogues on the uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE

PURPOSE

According to IAEA/EANM/SNMMI guidelines, long-acting somatostatin analogues (LA-SSAs) should be discontinued 4-6 weeks prior to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) to prevent somatostatin receptor saturation. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of continued use of long-acting SSAs during PRRT on the uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE on SPECT/CT.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumours who were treated with PRRT receiving 7.4 GBq of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) control (LA-SSA stopped > 6 weeks prior to PRRT), or continued treatment with (2) long-acting octreotide < 6 weeks prior to PRRT, or (3) long-acting lanreotide < 6 weeks prior to PRRT. The uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE was quantified in healthy tissues (spleen, liver, kidneys, bone marrow) and tumour lesions on SPECT/CT performed 24 h after PRRT. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine differences in uptake between the long-acting octreotide and long-acting lanreotide groups compared to the control group.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with 135 cycles of PRRT were included: 28 with lanreotide, 50 with octreotide, and 57 cycles without LA-SSAs. Uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE was significantly decreased in liver parenchyma in patients with lanreotide (p < 0.001) and in the spleen in patients with either octreotide or lanreotide (both p < 0.001). No differences were observed for uptake in kidneys, bone marrow, and blood pool. Uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE in tumours was the same in patients with lanreotide compared to the control (p = 0.862) and in patients with octreotide compared to the control (p = 0.201), independent of tumour location.

CONCLUSION

Long-acting octreotide and lanreotide do not interfere with the uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE in tumour lesions 24 h post-injection. Uptake in healthy liver parenchyma significantly decreases after lanreotide administration prior to PRRT, while uptake in healthy spleen tissue significantly decreases with both octreotide and lanreotide administration.

Non-Interventional Management of Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Patients with von Hippel-Lindau Disease

Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) is a rare autosomal dominant hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome. Patients with VHL have a high risk for developing retinal and central nervous system hemangioblastoma, pheochromocytoma, renal cell carcinoma, and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNEN). About a fifth of patients with VHL will develop PNEN, and only a tenth of them will develop metastatic or unresectable (advanced) PNEN requiring medical intervention. In this review, we performed a literature search for studies, written in English, on the medical interventions for VHL-related localized and advanced PNENs and their clinical outcomes. We detail the various medical interventions for this rare group of patients, including their mode of action and potential efficacy and toxicity. Finally, based on the current literature, we delineate a possible management algorithm for patients with VHL and advanced PNEN. We can conclude that data on the efficacy of various vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor inhibitors, and on the efficacy of belzutifan, a novel hypoxia-inducible factor 2 inhibitor, for the management of advanced PNEN in VHL, are scarce. Hence, deduction from the management of sporadic PNEN is required, and is implemented in the proposed management algorithm provided within this review.

Long-Term Outcomes of Submaximal Activities of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE in Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients

In the literature, up to 45% of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients who are treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) do not receive the intended cumulative activity of 29.6 GBq (800 mCi). The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of submaximal activities of PRRT in patients who discontinued treatment for non-disease-related reasons. Methods: We retrospectively included patients with well-differentiated and advanced NETs who underwent PRRT from 2000 until 2019 and did not receive 29.6 GBq of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE. For comparison, we selected control NET patients who received the intended cumulative activity of 29.6 GBq of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE between 2000 and 2012. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor response, and the secondary outcome was overall survival (OS). Results: In total, 243 patients received 3.7-27.8 GBq. In 130 patients, the submaximal activity was unrelated to disease (e.g., bone marrow and renal toxicity in 48% and maximal renal absorbed dose in 23%), and they were included. Patients receiving a reduced activity had more bone metastases, a lower body mass index and albumin level, a higher alkaline phosphatase level, and fewer grade 1 tumors than the 350 patients included in the control group. The disease control rate in the reduced-activity group was 85%, compared with 93% for the control group (P = 0.011). The median PFS (95% CI) was 23 mo (range, 21-26 mo) for the reduced-activity group and 31 mo (range, 27-35 mo) for the control group (P = 0.001), and the median OS (95% CI) was 34 mo (range, 28-40 mo) and 60 mo (range, 53-67 mo), respectively (P < 0.0001). With adjustment for relevant confounders in the multivariable Cox regression analyses, cumulative activity was an independent predictor of both PFS and OS. Conclusion: In NET patients treated with a cumulative activity of less than 29.6 GBq of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE, PRRT was less efficacious in tumor response and survival than in patients who received 29.6 GBq.

Predicting subacute hematological toxicity of 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy using healthy organs' uptake on post-treatment quantitative SPECT: A pilot study

The aim is to investigate the usefulness of 177Lu-DOTA-0-Tyr3-Octreotate (DOTATATE) healthy organs' (spleen, kidneys, bone marrow) standard uptake value for the prediction of subacute hematological toxicity in patients undergoing 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment. All patients referred from January 2021 to May 2022 for 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment were retrospectively screened. For each treatment session, baseline clinical data including age, sex, weight, delay between 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment and last cold somatostatin analogue intake were collected. Mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) of healthy organs was measured and analyzed by generalized linear mixed effect models. Outcomes (significant decrease of platelets, hemoglobin levels and neutrophils) were assessed 1 month later, considering their within-subject biological coefficient of variation, published by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. A total of 9 patients (33 treatment sessions) were included. No predictive factors were identified for platelet and neutrophil decrease. Splenic SUVmean was found to be a significant predictor of hemoglobin levels decrease. Using an optimal threshold of ≥6.22, derived sensitivity and specificity to predict hemoglobin decrease were 85.7% [46.4; 99.0] and 76.9% [57.5; 89.2] respectively with an accuracy of 82.4%. Although not significantly predictive of hematological toxicity, bone marrow SUVmean and renal SUVmean were correlated with splenic SUVmean. Quantitative single photon emission computed tomography and healthy organs analysis might help to foresee hematological subacute toxicity in patients undergoing 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment and improve patient management.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

The concept of using a targeting molecule labeled with a diagnostic radionuclide for using positron emission tomography or single photon emission computed tomography imaging with the potential to demonstrate that tumoricidal radiation can be delivered to tumoral sites by administration of the same or a similar targeting molecule labeled with a therapeutic radionuclide termed "theranostics." Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs (SSAs) is a well-established second/third-line theranostic treatment for somatostatin receptor-positive well-differentiated (neuro-)endocrine neoplasms (NENs). PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE was approved by the regulatory authorities in 2017 and 2018 for selected patients with low-grade well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NENs. It improves progression-free survival as well as quality of life of GEP NEN patients. Favorable symptomatic and biochemical responses using PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE have also been reported in patients with functioning metastatic GEP NENs like metastatic insulinomas, Verner Morrison syndromes (VIPomas), glucagonomas, and gastrinomas and patients with carcinoid syndrome. This therapy might also become a valuable therapeutic option for inoperable low-grade bronchopulmonary NENs, inoperable or progressive pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, and medullary thyroid carcinomas. First-line PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE and combinations of this therapy with cytotoxic drugs are currently under investigation. New radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands include SSAs coupled with alpha radiation emitting radionuclides and somatostatin receptor antagonists coupled with radionuclides.

A Clinical Guide to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE in Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-[DOTA⁰,Tyr³]-octreotate (¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE) has become an established second- or third-line treatment option for patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Clinical evidence of the efficacy of PRRT in tumor control has been proven and lower risks of disease progression or death are seen combined with an improved quality of life. When appropriate patient selection is performed, PRRT is accompanied by limited risks for renal and hematological toxicities. Treatment of NET patients with PRRT requires dedicated clinical expertise due to the biological characteristics of PRRT and specific characteristics of NET patients. This review provides an overview for clinicians dealing with NET on the history, molecular characteristics, efficacy, toxicity and relevant clinical specifics of PRRT.

Active bone marrow S-values for the low-energy electron emitter terbium-161 compared to S-values for lutetium-177 and yttrium-90

BACKGROUND

Based on theoretical and preclinical results, terbium-161 may be a valid alternative to lutetium-177 and yttrium-90 in radionuclide therapies. The large low-energy electron emission from terbium-161 is a favorable feature in the treatment of disseminated disease, but its impact on the radiosensitive bone marrow needs to be evaluated. Using voxel-based skeletal dosimetry models in which active bone marrow is defined as regions containing stem cells and progenitor cells of the hematopoietic lineage, we generated S-values (absorbed dose per decay) for terbium-161 and evaluated its distribution-dependence in bone marrow cavities.

METHODS

S-values in the active bone marrow were calculated for terbium-161, lutetium-177, and yttrium-90 irradiation using two (male/female) image-based bone marrow dosimetry models. The radionuclides were distributed to one of the three structures that define the spongiosa bone region in the skeletal models: (i) active bone marrow, (ii) inactive bone marrow, or (iii) surface or whole volume of the trabecular bone. Decay data from ICRP 107 were combined with specific absorbed fractions to calculate S-values for 13 skeletal sites. To increase the utility, the skeletal site-specific S-values were averaged to produce whole-body average S-values and spongiosa average S-values.

RESULTS

For yttrium-90, the high-energy β particles irradiate the active marrow regardless of the source compartment, consistently generating the highest S-values (65-90% higher). Between terbium-161 and lutetium-177, the largest differences in S-values were with an active marrow source (50%), such as self-irradiation, due to the contribution of the short-ranged conversion and Auger electrons from terbium-161. Their influence decreased as the source moved to inactive marrow or the surface or volume of the trabecular bone, reducing the S-values and the differences between terbium-161 and lutetium-177 (15-35%).

CONCLUSION

The S-values of terbium-161 for active bone marrow and, consequently, the bone marrow toxicity profile were more dependent on the radionuclide distribution within the bone marrow cavity than the S-values of lutetium-177 and yttrium-90. This effect was attributed to the considerable low-energy electron emission of terbium-161. Therefore, it will be critical to investigate the bone marrow distribution of a particular radiopharmaceutical for accurate estimation of the active bone marrow dose.

ACR-ACNM-ASTRO-SNMMI Practice Parameter for Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) DOTATATE Therapy

OBJECTIVES

This practice parameter (PP) for Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) aims to guide authorized users in selection of appropriate adult candidates with gastroeneropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) from foregut, midgut, and hindgut. The essential selection criteria include somatostatin receptor-positive GEP-NETs, which are usually inoperable and progressed despite standard therapy. Lu-177 DOTATATE is a radiopharmaceutical with high avidity for somatostatin receptors that are overexpressed by these tumors. This document ensures safe handling of Lu-177 DOTATATE by the authorized users and safe management of affected patients.

METHODS

The document was developed according to the systematic process developed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) and described on the ACR Web site (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards). The PP development was led by 2 ACR Committees on Practice Parameters (Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology) collaboratively with the American College of Nuclear Medicine, American Society of Radiation Oncology, and Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

RESULTS

The Lu-177 DOTATATE PP reviewed pharmacology, indications, adverse effects, personnel qualifications, and required clinical evaluation before starting the treatment, as well as the recommended posttherapy monitoring, quality assurance, documentation, and appropriate radiation safety instructions provided in written form and explained to the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Lu-177 DOTATATE is available for therapy of inoperable and/or advanced GEP-NETs when conventional therapy had failed. It can reduce tumor size, improve symptoms, and increase the progression free survival. The PP document provides clinical guidance for authorized users to assure an appropriate, consistent, and safe practice of Lu-177 DOTATATE.

ACR-ACNM-ASTRO-SNMMI Practice Parameter for Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) DOTATATE Therapy

OBJECTIVES

This practice parameter (PP) for Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) aims to guide authorized users in selection of appropriate adult candidates with gastroeneropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) from foregut, midgut, and hindgut. The essential selection criteria include somatostatin receptor-positive GEP-NETs, which are usually inoperable and progressed despite standard therapy. Lu-177 DOTATATE is a radiopharmaceutical with high avidity for somatostatin receptors that are overexpressed by these tumors. This document ensures safe handling of Lu-177 DOTATATE by the authorized users and safe management of affected patients.

METHODS

The document was developed according to the systematic process developed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) and described on the ACR Web site (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards). The PP development was led by 2 ACR Committees on Practice Parameters (Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology) collaboratively with the American College of Nuclear Medicine, American Society of Radiation Oncology, and Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

RESULTS

The Lu-177 DOTATATE PP reviewed pharmacology, indications, adverse effects, personnel qualifications, and required clinical evaluation before starting the treatment, as well as the recommended posttherapy monitoring, quality assurance, documentation, and appropriate radiation safety instructions provided in written form and explained to the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Lu-177 DOTATATE is available for therapy of inoperable and/or advanced GEP-NETs when conventional therapy had failed. It can reduce tumor size, improve symptoms, and increase the progression free survival. The PP document provides clinical guidance for authorized users to assure an appropriate, consistent, and safe practice of Lu-177 DOTATATE.

Severe Thrombocytopenia in Patients With Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumor Treated With Peptide Receptor Radioligand Therapy

BACKGROUND

Peptide receptor radioligand therapy (PRRT) was Food and Drug Administration approved in 2018 for the treatment of unresectable somatostatin receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and provides an important option for patients with advanced disease. A known adverse effect of this treatment is hematologic toxicity, although usually transient. We present 3 patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic NETs treated with PRRT who were evaluated for severe persistent thrombocytopenia.

METHODS

Three patients who commenced therapy with PRRT were known to proceed to a bone marrow (BM) biopsy for persistent severe thrombocytopenia and were included in this study. These patients were identified retrospectively and evaluated for their tumor properties, including immunohistochemical markers, treatment modalities, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

All 3 patients had metastatic NETs that progressed on prior lines of therapy and were treated with 1 to 4 doses of 177Lu-DOTATATE 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) before developing grade 3 (25,000 to 50,000/μL) refractory thrombocytopenia. All patients had concurrent bone metastases, and 2 of the 3 had baseline grade 1 thrombocytopenia. In all 3 cases, BM biopsy documented widespread tumor infiltration.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe refractory thrombocytopenia after PRRT is rare and may result from numerous known causes, including radiation-induced myelotoxicity, myelodysplastic syndrome, and tumor BM infiltration. We present 3 cases of thrombocytopenia related to persistent or progressive BM metastasis. Although known bone metastasis is not a contraindication to PRRT, thrombocytopenia may be a manifestation of tumor progression and should be considered when making decisions about continuation of therapy.

Treatment of neuroendocrine tumours with 177 Lu-peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: Challenging clinical scenarios and their management

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumours is usually well tolerated, with selection based on existing guidelines. However, there are various scenarios where the risk-benefit analysis of PRRT needs to be evaluated to limit any complications associated with PRRT. This review looks at 11 key scenarios where the risk-benefit of PRRT needs to be closely evaluated.

EANM dosimetry committee recommendations for dosimetry of 177Lu-labelled somatostatin-receptor- and PSMA-targeting ligands

The purpose of the EANM Dosimetry Committee is to provide recommendations and guidance to scientists and clinicians on patient-specific dosimetry. Radiopharmaceuticals labelled with lutetium-177 (177Lu) are increasingly used for therapeutic applications, in particular for the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumours using ligands for somatostatin receptors and prostate adenocarcinoma with small-molecule PSMA-targeting ligands. This paper provides an overview of reported dosimetry data for these therapies and summarises current knowledge about radiation-induced side effects on normal tissues and dose-effect relationships for tumours. Dosimetry methods and data are summarised for kidneys, bone marrow, salivary glands, lacrimal glands, pituitary glands, tumours, and the skin in case of radiopharmaceutical extravasation. Where applicable, taking into account the present status of the field and recent evidence in the literature, guidance is provided. The purpose of these recommendations is to encourage the practice of patient-specific dosimetry in therapy with 177Lu-labelled compounds. The proposed methods should be within the scope of centres offering therapy with 177Lu-labelled ligands for somatostatin receptors or small-molecule PSMA.

Early Complications of Radioisotope Therapy with Lutetium-177 and Yttrium-90 in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms-A Preliminary Study

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) constitute a heterogenous group of tumors originating from neuroendocrine cells scattered throughout the body. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) is a treatment of choice of unresectable metastasized progressive and well-differentiated NENs. The aim of the study was to assess early bone marrow and kidney injury after administration of Lutetium-177 or Lutetium-177 combined with Yttrium-90. Thirty-one patients received treatment with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATATE with the activity of 7.4 GBq. Eleven patients received tandem treatment with [⁹⁰Y]Y-DOTATATE with the activity of 1.85 GBq + [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATATE with the activity of 1.85 GBq. After PRRT a significant decrease in leukocyte, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts was noted. Tandem treatment demonstrated a more marked decrease in white blood cell count compared to Lutetium-177 therapy only. Conversely, no significant influence on glomerular filtration was found in this assessment. However, PRRT triggered acute renal tubule dysfunction, regardless of the treatment type. Regarding the acute complications, PRRT appeared to be a safe modality in the treatment of patients with NEN.

Personalized Dosimetry in Targeted Radiation Therapy: A Look to Methods, Tools and Critical Aspects

Targeted radiation therapy (TRT) is a strategy increasingly adopted for the treatment of different types of cancer. The urge for optimization, as stated by the European Council Directive (2013/59/EURATOM), requires the implementation of a personalized dosimetric approach, similar to what already happens in external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The purpose of this paper is to provide a thorough introduction to the field of personalized dosimetry in TRT, explaining its rationale in the context of optimization and describing the currently available methodologies. After listing the main therapies currently employed, the clinical workflow for the absorbed dose calculation is described, based on works of the most experienced authors in the literature and recent guidelines. Moreover, the widespread software packages for internal dosimetry are presented and critical aspects discussed. Overall, a selection of the most important and recent articles about this topic is provided.

Safety of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB treatment: a preclinical study characterizing absorbed dose and acute, early, and late organ toxicity

Purpose

The radiolabeled gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR)-targeting antagonist NeoB is a promising radioligand for imaging and therapy of GRPR-expressing malignancies. In the current study, we aimed to discover the target organs of toxicity and the radiotoxic effects to these organs, when repeated dosages of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-NeoB are administered to healthy female and male mice.

Methods

Animals received either 3 injections, with a 7-day interval, of vehicle (control group 1), 1200 pmol [¹⁷⁵Lu]Lu-NeoB (control group 2) or 40 MBq/400 pmol, 80 MBq/800 pmol, and 120 MBq/1200 pmol [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-NeoB (treatment groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). At week 5, 19, and 43 after the first injection acute, early, and late organ toxicity, respectively, was determined. For this, histopathological and blood analyses were performed. To correlate the observed toxicity to absorbed dose, we also performed extensive biodistribution and dosimetry studies.

Results

The biodistribution study showed the highest absorbed doses in GRPR-expressing pancreas, the liver, and the kidneys (the main organs of excretion). Both control groups and almost all animals of treatment group 1 did not show any treatment-related toxicological effects. Despite the high absorbed doses, no clear microscopic signs of toxicity were found in the pancreas and the liver. Histological analysis indicated kidney damage in the form of hydronephrosis and nephropathy in treatment groups 2 and 3 that were sacrificed at the early and late time point. In the same groups, increased blood urea nitrogen levels were found.

Conclusion

In general, repeated administration of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-NeoB was tolerated. The most significant radiotoxic effects were found in the kidneys, similar to other clinically applied radioligands. The results of this study underline the potential of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-NeoB as a promising option for clinical therapy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-022-05926-2.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Targeting the Somatostatin Receptor: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Optimization Strategies

Simple Summary

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a systemic treatment consisting of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. This will subsequently cause lethal DNA damage to the tumor cell. The only target that is currently used in widespread clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor, which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review focuses on the basic principles and clinical applications of PRRT, and discusses several PRRT-optimization strategies.

Abstract

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) consists of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. The only target that is currently used in clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor (SSTR), which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review provides a summary of the treatment efficacy (e.g., response rates and symptom-relief), impact on patient outcome and toxicity profile of PRRT performed with different generations of SSTR-targeting radiopharmaceuticals, including the landmark randomized-controlled trial NETTER-1. In addition, multiple optimization strategies for PRRT are discussed, i.e., the dose–effect concept, dosimetry, combination therapies (i.e., tandem/duo PRRT, chemoPRRT, targeted molecular therapy, somatostatin analogues and radiosensitizers), new radiopharmaceuticals (i.e., SSTR-antagonists, Evans-blue containing vector molecules and alpha-emitters), administration route (intra-arterial versus intravenous) and response prediction via molecular testing or imaging. The evolution and continuous refinement of PRRT resulted in many lessons for the future development of radionuclide therapy aimed at other targets and tumor types.

Haematotoxicity during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: Baseline parameters differences and effect on patient's therapy course

BACKGROUND

Mainly severe (CTCAE grade 3-4) haematotoxicity during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is reported in literature due to major clinical impact, however moderate (CTCAE grade 2) haematotoxicity is common and could affect therapy management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the haematotoxicity course during PRRT and to compare baseline parameters between haematotoxicity grades.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 100 patients with a neuroendocrine tumour treated with PRRT were included. Patients were treated with an aimed number of four cycles with 7.4 GBq [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE administered every 10 weeks. Haematological assessment was performed at baseline and frequently up to 10 weeks after the fourth cycle. The lowest haematological value was graded according to CTCAE v5.0, and patients were classified using the highest observed grade. Differences in baseline parameters, including [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE positive tumour volume, were evaluated between CTCAE grades.

RESULTS

Four cycles were completed by 86/100 of patients, 4/100 patients discontinued due to haematotoxicity, and 10/100 patients due to progressive disease. The treatment course was adjusted due to haematotoxicity in 24/100 patients, including postponed next cycle (n = 17), reduced administered activity (n = 13), and both adjustments (n = 10). The most observed haematotoxicity grade was grade 0-1 in 54/100 patients, grade 2 in 38/100 and grade 3-4 in 8/100. Significant differences in baseline leucocyte, neutrophil and platelet counts were observed between grade 0-1 and grade 2. However, the correlation between baseline and lowest observed values was poor to moderate. No differences between haematotoxicity grades and baseline parameters or somatostatin receptor positive tumour volume was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of severe haematotoxicity was low with extensive screening and monitoring. The vast majority of patients (96/100) was not restricted in treatment continuation by haematotoxicity; therefore, our selection criteria appeared appropriate for safe PRRT treatment. Baseline parameters showed limited correlation with the degree of decline in haematological values.

Overcoming nephrotoxicity in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is used for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastasized somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2)-expressing gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs). The radiolabelled somatostatin analogue [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE delivers its radiation dose to SSTR2-overexpressing tumour cells, resulting in selective cell killing during radioactive decay. While tumour control can be achieved in many patients, complete remissions remain rare, causing the majority of patients to relapse after a certain period of time. This raises the question whether the currently fixed treatment regime (4 × 7.4 GBq) leaves room for dose escalation as a means of improving therapy efficacy. The kidneys have shown to play an important role in defining a patient's tolerability to PRRT. As a consequence of the proximal tubular reabsorption of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, via the endocytic megalin/cubilin receptor complex, the radionuclides are retained in the renal interstitium. This results in extended retention of radioactivity in the kidneys, generating a risk for the development of radiation nephropathy. In addition, a decreased kidney function has shown to be associated with a prolonged circulation of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, causing increased irradiation to the bone marrow. This can on its turn lead to myelosuppression and haematological toxicity, owing to the marked radio sensitivity of the rapidly proliferating cells in the bone marrow. In contrast to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), the exact absorbed dose limits for these critical organs (kidneys and bone marrow) in PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE are still unclear. Better insights into these uncertainties, can help in optimizing PRRT to reach its maximum therapeutic potential, while avoiding severe adverse events, like nephropathy and hematologic toxicities. In this review we focus on the nephrotoxic effects of PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE for the treatment of GEP-NETs. If the absorbed dose to the kidneys can be lowered, higher activities can be administered, enlarging the therapeutic window for PRRT. Therefore, we evaluated the renal protective potential of current and promising future strategies and discuss the importance of (renal) dosimetry in PRRT.

Hemorrhagic disseminated intravascular coagulation after 177Lu-Dotatate in metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumor: A case report

RATIONALE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-Dotatate represents a major breakthrough in the treatment of metastatic well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. This treatment is generally well tolerated. Reported severe long-term hematological side effects are rare and include hematopoietic neoplasms and bone marrow failure.

PATIENTS CONCERNS

We describe the case of a patient presenting spontaneous bleeding and bruising occurring 6 weeks after the first administration of 177Lu-Dotatate. Blood tests showed anemia, thrombocytopenia, prolonged clotting times, profound fibrinolysis and low levels of coagulation factors II and V. There were no signs of tumor lysis syndrome.

DIAGNOSES

We made the diagnosis of acute disseminated intravascular coagulation.

INTERVENTION

Treatment consisted of multiple transfusions of fresh frozen plasma, fibrinogen and platelets, and corticosteroids. Acute disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) persisted for 10 days and then resolved.

OUTCOMES

Metabolic imaging 5 months after the 177Lu-Dotatate administration showed disease progression. Treatment with 177Lu-Dotatate was not rechallenged due to the occurrence of DIC.

LESSONS

Our case suggests that acute hemorrhagic disseminated intravascular coagulation can be a rare and life-threatening subacute side effect of 177Lu-Dotatate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Prophylactic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection in Patients with Extensive Bone-Marrow Infiltration of Neuroendocrine Tumours Prior to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) can be successfully repeated but may eventually be dose-limited. Since ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE dose limitation may come from hematological rather than renal function, hematological peripheral blood stem cell backup might be desirable. Here, we report our initial experience of peripheral blood stem-cell collection (PBSC) in patients with treatment-related cytopenia and therefore high risk of bone-marrow failure. Five patients with diffuse bone-marrow infiltration of NET and relevant myelosuppression (≥grade 2) received PBSC before one PRRT cycle with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE (7.6 ± 0.8 GBq/cycle). Standard stem-cell mobilization with Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was applied, and successful PBSC was defined as a collection of >2 × 10⁶/kg CD34+ cells. In case of initial failure, Plerixafor was administered in addition to G-CSF prior to apheresis. PBSC was successfully performed in all patients with no adverse events. Median cumulative activity was 44.8 GBq (range, 21.3-62.4). Three patients had been previously treated with PRRT, two of which needed the addition of Plerixafor for stem-cell mobilization. Only one of five patients required autologous peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation during the median follow up time of 28 months. PBSC collection seems to be feasible in NET with bone-marrow involvement and might be worth considering as a backup strategy prior to PRRT, in order to overcome dose-limiting bone-marrow toxicity.

Application of FLIC model to predict adverse events onset in neuroendocrine tumors treated with PRRT

To develop predictive models of side effect occurrence in GEPNET treated with PRRT. Metastatic GEPNETs patients treated in our centre with PRRT (177Lu-Oxodotreotide) from 2019 to 2020 were considered. Haematological, liver and renal toxicities were collected and graded according to CTCAE v5. Patients were grouped according with ECOG-PS, number of metastatic sites, previous treatment lines and therapies received before PRRT. A FLIC model with backward selection was used to detect the most relevant predictors. A subsampling approach was implemented to assess variable selection stability and model performance. Sixty-seven patients (31 males, 36 females, mean age 63) treated with PRRT were considered and followed up for 30 weeks from the beginning of the therapy. They were treated with PRRT as third or further lines in 34.3% of cases. All the patients showed at least one G1-G2, meanwhile G3-G5 were rare events. No renal G3-G4 were reported. Line of PRRT administration, age, gender and ECOG-PS were the main predictors of haematological, liver and renal CTCAE. The model performance, expressed by AUC, was > 65% for anaemia, creatinine and eGFR. The application of FLIC model can be useful to improve GEPNET decision-making, allowing clinicians to identify the better therapeutic sequence to avoid PRRT-related adverse events, on the basis of patient characteristics and previous treatment lines.