Doppler ultrasound for TIPS: does it work?

Use of doppler ultrasound to predict need for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt revision

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is used to treat complications of portal hypertension, such as ascites and variceal bleeding (VB). While liver doppler ultrasound (DUS) is used to assess TIPS patency, trans-shunt venography (TSV) is the gold standard.

AIM

To determine the accuracy of DUS to assess TIPS dysfunction and for need for revision.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients referred for TIPS revision from 2008-2021. Demographics, DUS parameters at baseline and at the DUS preceding TIPS revision, TSV data were collected. Receiver operating characteristics curves, sensitivity, specificity, performance for doppler to predict need for revision were performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to predict clinical factors associated with need for TIPS revision.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 89 patients with cirrhosis (64% men, 76% white, 31% alcohol as etiology); median age 59 years. Indication for initial TIPS were VB (41%), refractory ascites (51%), and other (8%). TIPS was revised in 44%. On univariate analysis, factors associated with need for TIPS revision were male (P = 0.03), initial indication for TIPS (P = 0.05) and indication for revision (P = 0.01). Revision of TIPS was associated with lower mortality (26% vs 46%) and significantly lower rates of transplant (13% vs 24%; P = 0.1). In predicting need for TIPS revision, DUS has a 40% sensitivity, 45% specificity, PPV 78%, and NPV 14%. The most accurate location for shunt velocity measure was distal velocity (Area under the curve: 0.79; P = 0.0007).

CONCLUSION

DUS has poor overall sensitivity and specificity in predicting need for TIPS revision. Non-invasive methods of predicting TIPS dysfunction are needed since those needing TIPS revision had better survival.

Identification of the Most Important Subset of Doppler, Laboratory, and Clinical Parameters for Serial TIPS Evaluation

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of the present study was to identify the subset of a wide range of serial Doppler, laboratory, and clinical parameters most predictive (both individually and in combination) of TIPS dysfunction in a large patient sample. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The medical records of 189 patients who had undergone TIPS procedures were analyzed. The patients (mean age, 52 years; 62% of whom were men) had undergone 1139 Doppler studies and 323 portovenograms. Laboratory parameters included model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores, serum albumin levels, presence of ascites, and time since last intervention. Doppler parameters included intrashunt velocities, temporal change in intrashunt velocities, main portal vein velocity, direction of flow in the left portal hepatic vein, and venous pulsatility index. Statistical analysis used ROC, univariate, and multivariate regression models to assess the parameters both individually and in combination. Shunt dysfunction was defined by a portosystemic gradient of more than 12 mm Hg. RESULTS. The laboratory and clinical parameters of greatest predictive value included the MELD score and the time since the last intervention. The Doppler parameters that were of greatest predictive value included the change in velocity at the hepatic venous end and the left portal vein flow direction. Multivariate models produced an AUC of 0.74. Differences between functional and dysfunctional shunts were also statistically significant for absolute velocity at the hepatic venous end, the change in velocity within the stent, and the temporal change in the mid shunt velocity. CONCLUSION. The subset of serial parameters most predictive of TIPS dysfunction are the temporal change in the velocity at the hepatic venous end, the absolute velocity at the hepatic venous end, the direction of flow in the left portal venous branch, and changes in the MELD score.

Role of Doppler Ultrasound Combined With Clinical Features in the Diagnosis of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Dysfunction in the Era of Covered Stents

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to discuss the role of Doppler ultrasound (US), combined with clinical features, in the diagnosis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) dysfunction in the era of covered stents. In light of the lack of research regarding the accuracy of Doppler US in TIPS dysfunction evaluations when using covered stents and a recent major meta-analysis, which primarily reviewed studies with bare metal stents but few with covered stents, we aimed to provide our single-center case study for further investigation.

METHODS

All patients from 2010 to 2019 who underwent angiography for a covered stent preceded by a Doppler US examination in our institution were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

All of the Doppler US and angiographic examination results showed complete agreement, and 11 of 12 were positive for TIPS dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining the presence of positive clinical signs for TIPS dysfunction with Doppler US may increase its accuracy. Considering our results, there may be a need to reinvestigate Doppler US as a noninvasive, inexpensive, and available tool for the diagnosis of TIPS dysfunction in the era of covered stents, despite recent publications depicting Doppler US as inadequate for evaluating a TIPS.

Effect of VIATORR stent in early ultrasound evaluation after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): A case report

Shunt dysfunction is a major complication of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Ultrasonography is a preferred method of shunt follow-up after TIPS, but some misjudgments can occur in cases of shunt dysfunction due to peculiarities of the VIATORR stent. Here we report one case and suggest that the first ultrasound evaluation for patients who received TIPS procedure with VIATORR stent should be performed one month after the procedure.

Performance of ultrasound for detection of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt dysfunction: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Although ultrasound has been widely used to evaluate transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) patency, several studies have reported conflicting data regarding its performance. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate performance of ultrasound for detection of TIPS dysfunction by performing a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Literature search was performed for studies evaluating ultrasound for TIPS dysfunction, stenosis, and occlusion using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library through February 2019. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, log diagnostic odds ratio (LDOR), and area under curve (AUC) of summary receiver-operating characteristic were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed according to ultrasonographic criteria and type of stent.

RESULTS

In total, 21 studies were evaluated. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and LDOR of ultrasound for detection of TIPS dysfunction were 0.82 (0.67, 0.93), 0.58 (0.46, 0.70), and 1.77 (1.20, 2.35). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and LDOR for TIPS stenosis were 0.80 (0.69, 0.90), 0.80 (0.69, 0.91), and 2.83 (1.88, 3.78). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and LDOR for TIPS occlusion were 0.96 (0.92, 0.99), 1 (0.99, 1.00), and 6.28 (4.96, 7.60). AUCs of ultrasound for TIPS dysfunction, stenosis, and occlusion were 0.77, 0.86, and 0.95, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ultrasound had excellent performance for TIPS occlusion and acceptable performance for TIP stenosis, most studies utilized bare metal stent, and therefore, application to current practice is limited. Ultrasound for TIPS dysfunction in the setting of covered metal stent appeared to have acceptable sensitivity of 0.82, but limited specificity of 0.58 and low LDOR of 1.77. A new noninvasive tool is needed for detection of TIPS dysfunction in the era of covered metal stent.

Twenty-five years after the first TIPS in Spain

The incorporation, 25 years ago, of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting, better known by the acronym TIPS, represents an indisputable improvement in the treatment and management of patients with symptoms due to portal hypertension. This article discusses the origins of the technique and the technical innovations that have been progressively added through the years. The implantation of coated stents, which protect the stent from processes in the parenchymal track that can lead to stenosis, have helped ensure long-term patency, thus reducing the need for reintervention. Solid evidence from valuable publications has situated TIPS at the forefront of the treatment options in a wide variety of clinical situations associated with portal hypertension.

Diagnostic radiology of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are an effective method for treating the complications of portal hypertension. Specific indications for TIPS include secondary prevention of variceal bleeding and refractory ascites. The purpose of this review is to summarize the role of diagnostic radiology in the creation and assessment of TIPS, to highlight the complications that can occur post-TIPS, and to critically evaluate the literature regarding ultrasound evaluation of TIPS.

Covered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: accuracy of ultrasound in detecting shunt malfunction

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of ultrasound for detecting transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) malfunction in covered stents in comparison with bare metal stents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During a 6-year period, 126 TIPS angiography examinations were performed in 78 patients who had undergone a recent TIPS ultrasound examination. Radiology reports and images were retrospectively reviewed, and the sensitivity and specificity of sonographic parameters for detecting TIPS dysfunction were calculated using TIPS angiography and portosystemic gradient as the reference standards.

RESULTS

Of 126 paired studies, 43 were in bare metal TIPS and 83 were in covered TIPS. Peak shunt velocity of covered and bare metal TIPS measured by ultrasound showed comparable sensitivities for detection of shunt dysfunction, using both depressed (< 90 cm/s) and elevated (> 200 cm/s) peak shunt velocity criteria. However, a depressed velocity was more specific in covered TIPS (0.939 vs 0.550, p < 0.001) whereas elevated velocity was more specific in bare TIPS (0.485 vs 0.800, p = 0.041). An interval change in peak TIPS velocity greater than 25% was significantly more sensitive in detection of dysfunction in covered TIPS (0.815 vs 0.400, p = 0.015) whereas detection based on main portal vein velocities (≤ 30 cm/s) was not statistically different in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the accuracy of ultrasound for detection of TIPS shunt malfunction is at least as high in covered stents as in bare metal stents. Diagnostic performance for several sonographic parameters varied significantly between bare and covered stents, suggesting the need for optimization of sonographic criteria for covered stents.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a new method for TIPS follow-up

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the detection of TIPS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) complications.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

67 cirrhotic patients who underwent TIPS between 2001 and 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-two vascular examinations in 37 patients for suspicion of TIPS dysfunction based on the clinical or radiological criteria were analyzed and compared with the 62 related Doppler and CEUS examinations obtained previously. Abnormal CEUS was defined as poor opacification of the prosthesis compared to the native portal vein, stent stenosis, hepatic vein stenosis, and occlusion of the stent.

RESULTS

Among the 62 vascular examinations, 56 were considered as pathologic, including: 20 occlusions, 25 stent stenoses, 9 hepatic vein stenoses, 1 arterial-TIPS fistula, and 1 strong flow stealing through a voluminous paraumbilical vein associated with a patent shunt. 50 were exactly correlated with a previous CEUS examination, including 20/20 occlusions (100%), 23/25 stent stenoses (91%), 5/9 hepatic vein stenoses (56%), 1/1 fistula (100%), and 1/1 strong flow stealing (100%). Two CEUS and 14 Doppler examinations were false negative.

CONCLUSION

CEUS allows direct visualization of intra-prosthetic flow, with a qualitative and anatomic study, in addition to the Doppler examination. This is a new, simple, and effective technique for TIPS follow-up.

Role of ultrasound surveillance of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in the covered stent era

PURPOSE

To assess ultrasound (US) surveillance of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)-covered stents in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Procedural data, including stent size and portosystemic gradients (PSG) before and after creation of TIPS, were obtained retrospectively in 55 patients (33 men, 22 women). Chart review provided clinical information, including etiology of liver disease, indication for TIPS creation, and Child-Pugh class. Radiology reports provided US venography data and pathology reports confirmed shunt status in transplant recipients. Patients had baseline US examinations 3-7 days after TIPS creation with scheduled follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. Clinical and radiology reports were compared to evaluate US surveillance of Viatorr stents.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-nine US examinations were performed on 52 patients, for an average 3.1 studies per patient (range, 1-7) over a mean follow-up duration of 173 days (range, 0-1,013 d). Sixty-four US studies (40%) were baseline studies, 88 studies (55%) were routine follow-up studies, and seven (4%) were interval studies. US predicted TIPS abnormalities in 30 of 159 studies (19%); venography followed 15 of 30 abnormal US findings (50%) and clinical examinations complemented 10 of 15 venograms (67%). Venography and US were concordant in eight of 15 paired studies (53%); clinical examinations, when conducted, accurately predicted shunt status in all but one case. US findings changed management in six of 159 studies (4%): five of six (83%) were baseline evaluations and the other one (17%) was a routine follow-up examination. A total of five baseline US examinations (8%) and one surveillance examination (1%) altered patient management.

CONCLUSIONS

A single US examination after a TIPS procedure to confirm immediate function may be valuable, but routine US is not effective for long-term surveillance of ePTFE-covered stents.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an interventional treatment resulting in decompression of the portal system by creation of a side-to-side portosystemic anastomosis. Since its introduction 16 years ago, more than 1,000 publications have appeared demonstrating broad acceptance and increasing clinical use. This review summarizes our present knowledge about technical aspects and complications, follow-up of patients and indications. A technical success rate near 100% and a low occurrence of complications clearly depend on the skills of the operator. The follow-up of the TIPS patient has to assess shunt patency, liver function, hepatic encephalopathy and the possible development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Shunt patency can best be monitored by duplex sonography and can avoid routine radiological revision. Short-term patency may be improved by anticoagulation, while such a treatment does not influence long-term patency. Stent grafts covered with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene show promising long-term patency comparable with that of surgical shunts. With respect to the indications of TIPS, much is known about treatment of variceal bleeding and refractory ascites. The thirteen randomized studies that are available to date show that survival is comparable in patients receiving TIPS or endoscopic treatment for acute or recurrent variceal bleeding. Another group comprises patients with refractory ascites and related complications, such as hepatorenal syndrome and hepatic hydrothorax. It has been demonstrated that TIPS improves these complications. Five randomized studies comparing TIPS with paracentesis and one study comparing TIPS with the peritoneo-venous shunt showed good response of ascites but controversial results on survival. In addition, TIPS has been successfully applied to patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, portal vein thrombosis, before liver transplantation, and for the treatment of ectopic variceal bleeding.