Anlotinib combined with PD-1 blockade for the treatment of lung cancer: a real-world retrospective study in China

Feasibility and tolerability of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades as rechallenge immunotherapy in previously treated advanced ESCC: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) seemed favorable in several tumors, but clinical experience on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) was scanty. This real-world study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of anlotinib plus ICI for patients with previously ICI-treated advanced ESCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified advanced ESCC patients who received anlotinib plus ICI in the rechallenge setting for evaluation of clinical outcomes and safety. Totally 110 ICI-pretreated patients, of which 89 (80.9%) received prior first- or second-line treatment, were included from September 9, 2019, to November 30, 2022. Most patients (63.6%) discontinued initial ICI due to disease progression.

RESULTS

After rechallenge, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 11.1 (95% CI, 8.6-13.7) and 5.6 (95% CI, 4.4-6.8) months, respectively; estimated OS and PFS rates at 12 months were 47.6% (95% CI, 36.8%-57.7%) and 21.4% (95% CI, 10.9%-34.2%), respectively. No complete response was reported and 21 (19.1%) patients attained partial response; the objective response rate was 19.1%. Fifty-five (50.0%) had stable disease for a disease control rate of 69.1%. Of the 21 responders, median duration of response was 6.4 months. Tendencies for longer OS were observed in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance of 0 (P = .056). The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 10.0%.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib plus ICI in the rechallenge setting was promising and resulted in encouraging benefits for patients with previously ICI-treated advanced ESCC. Our findings provided preliminary but unique evidence to help select ESCC patients benefiting from this strategy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

chictr.org.cn; number ChiCTR2300070777.

Anlotinib reversed resistance to PD-1 inhibitors in recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancers: a real-world retrospective study

Patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancers (R/M HNCs) are prone to developing resistance after immunotherapy. This retrospective real-world study aims to investigate whether the addition of anlotinib can reverse resistance to PD-1 inhibitors (PD-1i) and evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination in R/M HNCs. Main outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), and safety. Potential biomarkers included PD-L1 expression, lipid index, and genomic profiling. Twenty-one patients with R/M HNCs were included, including 11 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), five head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), three salivary gland cancers (SGC), and two nasal cavity or paranasal sinus cancers (NC/PNC). Among all patients, ORR was 47.6% (95% CI: 28.6-66.7), with 2 (9.5%) complete response; DCR was 100%. At the median follow-up of 17.1 months, the median PFS and OS were 14.3 months (95% CI: 5.9-NR) and 16.7 months (95% CI:8.4-NR), respectively. The median DOR was 11.2 months (95% CI: 10.1-NR). As per different diseases, the ORR was 45.5% for NPC, 60.0% for HNSCC, 66.7% for SGC, and 50.0% for NC/PNC. Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1 or 2 (88.9%). The most common grades 3-4 TRAE was hypertension (28.6%), and two treatment-related deaths occurred due to bleeding. Therefore, adding anlotinib to the original PD-1i could reverse PD-1 blockade resistance, with a favorable response rate, prolonged survival, and acceptable toxicity, indicating the potential as a second-line and subsequent therapy choice in R/M HNCs.

Synergistic effect of additional anlotinib and immunotherapy as second-line or later-line treatment in pancreatic cancer: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is in urgent need of a second-line or later-line treatment strategy. We aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of additional anlotinib, specifically anlotinib in combination with immunotherapy, in patients with PDAC who have failed first-line therapy.

Methods

Patients with pathological diagnosis of PDAC were additionally treated with anlotinib, and some patients were treated with anti-PD-1 agents at the same time, which could be retrospectively analyzed. The efficacy and safety of additional anlotinib were evaluated.

Results

A total of 23 patients were included. In patients treated with additional anlotinib, the overall median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.8 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 6.3 months, regardless of anti-PD-1 agents. Among patients receiving additional anlotinib in combination with anti-PD-1 agents, median PFS and OS were 1.8 and 6.5 months, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were observed in 16 patients (69.6%). In patients treated with additional anlotinib, the majority of AEs were grade 1-3. Univariate analysis revealed that patients with baseline red blood cell distribution width (RDW) <14% treated with additional anlotinib plus anti-PD-1 agents had significantly longer OS than patients with baseline RDW ≥14% (p = 0.025). Patients with additional anlotinib plus anti-PD-1 agents as second-line therapy had a longer OS than those treated as later-line therapy (p = 0.012). Multivariate analysis showed that baseline RDW was the only independent risk factor for OS (p = 0.042).

Conclusion

The combination of anlotinib and immunotherapy represents an effective add-on therapy with tolerable AEs as second- or later-line therapy in patients with PDAC, particularly in patients with baseline RDW <14%.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of anlotinib monotherapy or anlotinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitor for advanced small cell lung cancer with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib, as a salvage treatment for patients after failure of third-line or later-line treatments for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), has shown efficacy in patients with brain metastases (BMs). However, the efficacy and safety of anlotinib alone or in combination with immunotherapy for SCLC with BMs remain unclear.

METHOD

Patients treated with anlotinib alone or in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between April 2019 and February 2023 were identified. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe the progression-free survival (PFS) and intracranial PFS (iPFS). A waterfall diagram was used to indicate changes in intracranial lesions.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients were included; 29 received anlotinib alone, and 19 were administered anlotinib plus ICI. Combination therapy, compared with anlotinib, was associated with significantly longer PFS and iPFS (PFS: 8.1 months vs. 2.5 months, P < 0.001; iPFS: 8.1 months vs. 2.5 months, P = 0.004). Similar results were observed in patients with multiple BMs (PFS: 8.1 months vs. 1.9 months, P = 0.001; iPFS: 8.1 months vs. 1.9 months, P = 0.002). After third-line or later-line treatments, patients treated with ICI plus anlotinib also achieved significant PFS and iPFS benefits (PFS: 8.4 months vs. 2.1 months, P < 0.001; iPFS: 9.2 months vs. 2.1 months, P = 0.002). No new or severe adverse events were observed with combination therapy.

CONCLUSION

The combination of anlotinib and ICI has promising intracranial and extracranial efficacy with tolerable toxicity, and may be a therapeutic option for SCLC patients with BMs.

Efficacy and safety of sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy for recurrent extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective study

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) no longer are approved for second-line or later treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), and have not been studied in combination with chemotherapy. Exploring the efficacy and safety of second-line or later immunotherapy for ES-SCLC is an urgent clinical question that needs to be addressed, and combination therapies are an important research direction. This study intended to investigate the efficacy and safety of the sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy as a second-line and beyond treatment option for ES-SCLC.

Methods

Medical records of patients who received treatment with sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone as a second-line or beyond therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The study evaluated efficacy and safety. Indicators of efficacy included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety indicators included adverse events (AEs).

Results

This cohort comprised of 46 patients: 24 in the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group and 22 in the chemotherapy group. Chemotherapy received by both groups was either albumin-bound paclitaxel or irinotecan. Compared with the chemotherapy group, the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group had higher ORR and DCR (ORR: 37.5% vs. 9.1%, P=0.04; DCR: 75.0% vs. 40.9%, P=0.04), and significantly prolonged PFS and OS [median PFS (mPFS): 5.07 vs. 2.45 months, P=0.006; median OS (mOS): 14.43 vs. 10.34 months, P=0.009]. Also, there was no significant increase in the incidence of AEs in the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group, which was well tolerated by patients.

Conclusions

Sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy is superior to single-agent chemotherapeutic treatment as second-line or later therapy in ES-SCLC patients who have not received prior immunotherapy. These results need to be confirmed in future clinical trials.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of domestically produced tislelizumab, camrelizumab, and imported pembrolizumab in the treatment of advanced NSCLC: a real-world retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Since the imported PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab was listed in China in 2018, China has opened up the era of immunotherapy for malignant tumors, with several domestically produced PD-1 inhibitors coming onto the market one after another. To find out whether there are differences in the efficacy and safety of domestic and imported PD-1 inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, we conducted this retrospective study in two tertiary hospitals in China.

METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC treated with tislelizumab or camrelizumab or pembrolizumab who met the inclusion criteria were screened through the electronic medical record system. A total of 259 patients were screened, but due to the unbalanced baseline, we performed propensity score matching and finally included 149 patients in three groups: pembrolizumab (n = 38), tislelizumab (n = 38), and camrelizumab (n = 73), which had very balanced baseline characteristics in each group after propensity score matching treatment.

RESULTS

The results showed that the median progression-free period was 11.3 m vs 10.1 m vs 8.9 m; p = 0.754; and the objective response rate was 63.2% vs 50% vs 57.5%; P = 0.510 for pembrolizumab, tislelizumab, and carrelizumab, respectively. There was no significant difference in median PFS between PD-L1 expression subgroups. In terms of safety, only skin toxicity of any grade of carrelizumab was higher than that of the other two groups (p = 0.034), and the incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse reactions was not statistically significant among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world study, the efficacy and safety of the domestically produced tislelizumab, camrelizumab, and the imported pembrolizumab were comparable.

Corneal ulcer development due to sintilimab-anlotinib combination therapy-induced dry eye: a case report

Background

Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and anti-angiogenic drugs have become a hotspot in research of anti-tumor programs; however, they can also cause some rare drug-related adverse reactions. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) cause adverse reactions in the body, collectively known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Ocular side effects can occur in both targeted and immunotherapy patients, including dry eye, blurred vision, uveitis, conjunctivitis, retinopathy, or thyroid eye disease. To our knowledge, this is the first case report describing corneal ulcers secondary to dry eye in a patient treated with the combination of PD-1 inhibitor sintilimab and multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) anlotinib.

Case Description

A 65-year-old woman with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and bone metastases, without pre-existing ocular conditions, experienced mild dry eye symptoms 1 month following treatment with sintilimab (200 mg q3w) in combination with anlotinib (12 mg q3w). Unrelieved dry eye symptoms occurred after the third cycle of chemotherapy, and she was diagnosed with dry eye syndrome. Subsequently, she received corneal protective lens, sodium hyaluronate eye drops, and prednisone treatment. Her corneal epithelial damage did not improve significantly, and within the following 2 months, her vision decreased in both eyes and progressed to bilateral corneal ulcers. Oral administration of sintilimab and anlotinib was interrupted, and treatments such as corticosteroids, anti-inflammatory drugs, and corneal repair were administered; however, both eyes presented with corneal subepithelial defect and corneal scarring. Due to a shortage of donors, no corneal transplantation surgery could be performed.

Conclusions

The development of corneal epithelial disorders in patients receiving target therapy and immunotherapy may not be reversed by reducing its dose. Although the condition is controlled with the use of glucocorticoids, some eye side effects cannot be cured. The timely detection and intervention of adverse effects of anti-tumor drugs by oncologists and ophthalmologists is critical for rational prescription. Ophthalmologists should be aware of eye side effects in patients using immunotherapy to ensure appropriate treatment and minimize potential eye complications such as dry eye, conjunctivitis, etc.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors or not as advanced non-small cell lung cancer treatment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a leading cause of cancer mortality. Combined anlotinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy may have synergistic antitumor effects in NSCLC. This study aimed to comparing the efficacy and safety of anlotinib and ICIs treatment, monotherapy and combination in NSCLC.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 14 studies involving 4,308 NSCLC patients across four regimens: anlotinib, ICIs, anlotinib plus ICIs, and placebo. Efficacy outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Safety outcomes included treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), TRAE grade three or higher (TRAE ≥3). Analyses were performed in RevMan 5.3 and R 3.5.1 (gemtc package). P<0.05 or effect estimate with 95% confidence interval (CI) that did not include 1 indicated statistical significance.

Results

Fourteen publications involving 4,308 patients across four treatment regimens (anlotinib, ICIs, anlotinib plus ICIs, placebo) were included. For PFS, network meta-analysis showed all three interventions significantly improved PFS versus placebo. Anlotinib plus ICIs demonstrated the greatest PFS improvement [hazard ratio (HR) =0.24; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.36], followed by anlotinib (HR =0.37; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.58), and ICIs (HR =0.43; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.67). For OS, compared to placebo, anlotinib plus ICIs showed the greatest OS improvement (HR =0.52; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.74), followed by anlotinib (HR =0.66; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.95), and ICIs (HR =0.72; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.97). For ORR, anlotinib plus ICIs demonstrated the greatest improvement versus placebo [odds ratio (OR) =5.29; 95% CI: 3.32, 8.58], followed by anlotinib (OR =4.38; 95% CI: 2.42, 8.19), and ICIs (OR =2.17; 95% CI: 1.65, 2.89). For DCR, anlotinib plus ICIs showed the greatest improvement versus placebo (OR =13.32; 95% CI: 4.99, 45.09), followed by anlotinib (OR =5.56; 95% CI: 2.17, 14.38), and ICIs (OR =3.46; 95% CI: 1.29, 10.85). Compared to placebo, anlotinib was associated with the highest risk of TRAEs (OR =3.67, 95% CI: 1.12, 15.77), followed by ICIs (OR =1.83; 95% CI: 1.26, 2.69). Due to lack of data on anlotinib plus ICIs, no comparison was conducted. For grade ≥3 TRAEs, compared to placebo, anlotinib increased the risk (OR =3.67; 95% CI: 1.12, 15.77), while anlotinib plus ICIs (OR =2.45; 95% CI: 0.51, 11.6) and ICIs (OR =1.29; 95% CI: 0.33, 4.38) did not increase the risk.

Conclusions

Anlotinib combined with ICIs demonstrates improved efficacy over monotherapy for NSCLC treatment, without increased adverse events.

Effectiveness of PD1/PD-L1 combined with anti-angiogenic drugs in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Protein-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy have become an important treatment approach for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but primary or secondary resistance remains a challenge for some patients. PD-1/PD-L1 combined with anti-angiogenic drugs (AAs) in NSCLC patients have potential synergistic effects, and the survival benefit may vary based on a treatment order. To investigate the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 combined with AAs as the treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Materials and Methods

We comprehensively searched EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases from January 2017 to September 2022. The Cochrane risk bias tool evaluated the quality of included randomized clinical trials. Newcastle-Ottawa-Scale score was used to evaluate the quality of retrospective studies. Publication bias was evaluated by funnel plot, Begg's test, and Egger's test.

Results

Seventeen articles were finally selected, involving 5182 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that PD1/PD-L1 combined with AAs therapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-0.75, P < 0.00001), overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.71-0.88, P < 0.00001), and objective response rate (ORR) (risk ratio = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81-0.96, P = 0.004), with the statistically significant difference. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the PFS, ORR, and OS.

Conclusion

The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with AAs in treating advanced patients has exhibited notable therapeutic advantages when contrasted with monotherapy. Specifically, the administration of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in conjunction with AAs, or sequential treatment involving PD-1/PD-L1 followed by AAs, has shown enhanced therapeutic efficacy in this patient population.

Combination strategy exploration for prior treated recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of immunotherapy

To assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and target therapy (anti-angiogenesis or EGFR inhibitors) as a second-line or subsequent treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC), we conducted a retrospective study. In this study, previously treated R/M NPC patients were administered one of the following treatment: ICIs combined with target therapy and chemotherapy (ITC), ICIs combined with target therapy alone (IT), ICIs combined with chemotherapy (IC), or chemotherapy alone (C). The primary endpoint under consideration was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety measures. A total of 226 patients participated in this study, with 70 receiving the ITC regimen, 48 receiving IT, 48 treated with IC, and 60 undergoing C alone. The median PFS for the four cohorts was 20.67, 13.63, 12.47, and 7.93 months respectively. Notably, ITC regimen yielded the most favorable PFS among these cohorts. The ITC cohort exhibited a comparable tumor response and safety profile to the IT and IC cohorts (p > 0.05), but superior tumor response compared to the C cohort (p < 0.05). The ITC regimen also conferred a significant improvement in OS when comparing to C alone (HR 0.336, 95%CI 0.123-0.915, p = 0.033). The IT and IC regimens achieved a nearly identical PFS (HR 0.955, 95%CI 0.515-1.77, p = 0.884), although the IT regimen was associated with a lower occurrence of SAEs in contrast to the IC regimen (p < 0.05). In addition, the IT regimen demonstrated superior PFS (HR 0.583, 95%CI 0.345-0.985, p = 0.044) and fewer SAEs when compared to C alone (p < 0.05). These findings collectively support the notion that the combination of ICIs, target and chemotherapy exhibits robust antitumor activity in previously treated R/M NPC patients, without a significant increase in adverse events.

Lipid alterations play a role in the integration of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and anlotinib for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that integrating anlotinib with programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors enhances survival rates among progressive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients lacking driver mutations. However, not all individuals experience clinical benefits from this therapy. As a result, it is critical to investigate the factors that contribute to the inconsistent response of patients. Recent investigations have emphasized the importance of lipid metabolic reprogramming in the development and progression of NSCLC.

METHODS

The objective of this investigation was to examine the correlation between lipid variations and observed treatment outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients who were administered PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alongside anlotinib. A cohort composed of 30 individuals diagnosed with advanced NSCLC without any driver mutations was divided into three distinct groups based on the clinical response to the combination treatment, namely, a group exhibiting partial responses, a group manifesting progressive disease, and a group demonstrating stable disease. The lipid composition of patients in these groups was assessed both before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Significant differences in lipid composition among the three groups were observed. Further analysis revealed 19 differential lipids, including 2 phosphatidylglycerols and 17 phosphoinositides.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study aimed to explore the specific impact of anlotinib in combination with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors on lipid metabolism in patients with advanced NSCLC. By investigating the effects of using both anlotinib and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, this study enhances our understanding of lipid metabolism in lung cancer treatment. The findings from this research provide valuable insights into potential therapeutic approaches and the identification of new therapeutic biomarkers.

When chronic obstructive pulmonary disease meets small cell lung cancer: an unusual case report of rapid progression

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic inflammatory disease and a risk factor for lung cancer. Small cell lung cancer is a neuroendocrine tumor with a high degree of malignancy and an overall five-year survival rate of less than 7%.

CASES PRESENTATION

Herein, we report the case of an 68-year-old male presented to the respiratory department with cough, sputum, and dyspnea. He was diagnosed as community acquired pneumonia and treated with intravenous anti-infection. Previous pulmonary function was definitively diagnosed as COPD. About 7 months after discharge, the patient returned to the hospital for cough and dyspnea. After diagnosis of the tumor, cisplatin, etoposide and durvalumab were administered. Finally the patient died of respiratory failure approximately 9 months after his diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

For COPD patients with immunocompromised manifestations, it is necessary to be alert to complications and shorten the follow-up interval of chest CT. COPD may accelerate the formation and progression of SCLC.

Anlotinib combined with pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for advanced pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma: a case report and literature review

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is an uncommon variant of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), known for its unfavorable prognosis. Previous studies have elucidated that PSC generally exhibits a significant expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), an elevated tumor mutation burden, and marked vascular invasion. These factors imply the possible effectiveness of treatments like immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy. The subject of this case was a 65-year-old male diagnosed with advanced PSC, characterized by high PD-L1 expression and devoid of known driver gene mutations. Owing to the restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the patient initially underwent home-based treatment with anlotinib, which led to symptomatic improvement after a single treatment cycle. Subsequent hospitalization allowed for the administration of anlotinib plus Pembrolizumab, resulting in a partial response. Radiotherapy was necessitated due to local disease progression. But after 15 cycles of treatment with Pembrolizumab, hyperprogression was observed. The patient's overall survival spanned 14 months, with no evident adverse reactions to the medications. Genomic analysis revealed potential associations between treatment efficacy and mutations in the TP53, NF1, and MET genes. This case underscores the effectiveness and safety of a first-line treatment regimen combining pan-target anti-angiogenic therapy (anlotinib) with anti-tumor immunotherapy.

Research advances in mechanism of antiangiogenic therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Immunotherapy has changed the treatment strategy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent years, among which anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies are the most used. However, the majority of patients with NSCLC do not derive benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Vascular abnormalities are a hallmark of most solid tumors and facilitate immune evasion. Thus, combining antiangiogenic therapies might increase the effectiveness of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. In this paper, the mechanisms of anti-angiogenic agents combined with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies are illustrated, moreover, relevant clinical studies and predictive immunotherapeutic biomarkers are summarized and analyzed, in order to provide more treatment options for NSCLC patients.

Current status and future of anti-angiogenic drugs in lung cancer

Lung cancer, as a malignant tumor with both high incidence and mortality in China, is one of the major causes of death in our population and one of the major public health problems in China. Effective treatment of lung cancer is a major public health task for all human beings. Angiogenesis plays an important role in the development of tumor, not only as a basic condition for tumor growth, but also as a significant factor to promote tumor metastasis. Therefore, anti-angiogenesis has become a vital means to inhibit tumor development, and anti-angiogenic drugs can rebalance pro- and anti-angiogenic factors to inhibit tumor cells. This article reviews the mechanism of blood vessel formation in tumor tissues and the mechanism of action of different anti-angiogenic drugs, the combination therapy of anti-angiogenic drugs and other anti-tumor drugs, and the mechanism of anti-angiogenic drug resistance.

Investigation of the efficacy and feasibility of combined therapy of PD-L1-enhanced exogenous peripatetic adoptive natural killer (NK) cells in combination with antiangiogenic targeted therapy in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

A 67-year-old male patient presented with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer with the primary lesion located in the right upper lung, accompanied by multiple metastases to the pleura and abdominal cavity with enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes. A combination therapy approach was used to target the patient's multiple systemic metastases after localized radiotherapy. The approach involved adoptive transfer of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) enhanced exogenous natural killer (NK) cells, along with antiangiogenic treatment. Allogeneic cord blood NK cells were infused back into the patient over two consecutive days. On the first day, the treatment was followed by a dose of 1200 mg of atezolizumab. Subsequently, the patient received a daily dose of 10 mg of anlotinib administered orally for 14 days. This was followed by a 7-day break, and each cycle lasted 21 days. After delivering localized radiation to the primary lesion in the right lung and metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes, complete remission was achieved in the local lesion, effectively avoiding the risk of superior vena cava syndrome. Following six cycles of combined therapy, most of the metastatic lesions had disappeared, and the remaining metastatic lesions had significantly reduced in size. The recent therapeutic effect resulted in partial remission. The combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitor PD-L1-enhanced exogenous adoptive transfer NK cells, along with antiangiogenic targeted treatment, demonstrated a satisfactory short-term effect, with disappearance of most of the metastases and noticeable shrinkage in the remaining metastatic lesions.

Effect of anlotinib combined with ticeorgio for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a case report

For patients with locally unresectable recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma who relapsed after 2 years of radiotherapy, re-radiotherapy is also the preferred treatment. However, for patients relapsed within 2 years, the use of re-radiotherapy would be greatly limited by its adverse effects. Consequently, finding a new strategy to prolong the time of re-radiotherapy for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma is very necessary to reduce the related side effects and improve the curative effect. Anlotinib is an orally available small molecule multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor that primarily inhibits VEGFR2/3, FGFR1-4, PDGFR α/β, c-Kit, and Ret. However, whether recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients can be treated with anlotinib combined with ticeorgio (also called S-1) remains unknown. Herein, we report a nasopharyngeal carcinoma patient with local recurrence after radical radiotherapy who benefited from combination treatment of anlotinib with ticeorgio.

Camrelizumab as a novel third or post-third-line treatment strategy in small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study of 12 patients

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) constitutes 15% of all lung cancer cases, with a comparatively low survival rate. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has provided new alternatives for treating SCLC. However, the effectiveness of camrelizumab in the treatment of SCLC remains unclear. This retrospective case series was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab in SCLC patients.

Methods

The study enrolled SCLC patients recorded as having received more than one cycle of camrelizumab in the electronic medical record system. Data related to clinical and survival times were collected and statistically analyzed.

Results

From August 2019 to December 2021, the study enrolled 12 SCLC patients. The objective response rate was 41.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.2%-72.3%). The disease control rate was 83.3% (95% CI: 51.6%-97.9%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 4.0 months. Notably, the median PFS of patients in third- or post-third-line subgroups was 7 months (95% CI: 1.12-12.88 months). The median overall survival (OS) for all eligible patients was 10.0 months (95% CI: 7.35-12.65 months), with a 1-year survival rate of 25%. Notably, the OS of patients treated with third- or post-third-line therapy was 5-34 months, with a 1-year survival rate of 75%. The two most prevalent non-hematological adverse events associated with the immune response were pneumonitis (44.4%) and reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (44.4%). One patient experienced an exacerbation of preexisting diabetes and reached grade 3 hyperglycemia. There were no grade 4/5 immune-related adverse events.

Conclusion

This case series highlights the potential benefits and safety concerns of camrelizumab in SCLC patients. These findings suggest a possible strategy for third- and post-third-line treatments of SCLC. However, the conclusion is limited due to the study's retrospective nature and small sample size. Therefore, large-scale randomized controlled studies are needed to determine its efficacy.

Integrated analysis of single-cell and Bulk RNA sequencing reveals a malignancy-related signature in lung adenocarcinoma

Background

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), the most common histotype of lung cancer, may have variable prognosis due to molecular variations. The research strived to establish a prognostic model based on malignancy-related risk score (MRRS) in LUAD.

Methods

We applied the single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data from Tumor Immune Single Cell Hub database to recognize malignancy-related geneset. Meanwhile, we extracted RNA-seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. The GSE68465 and GSE72094 datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus database were downloaded to validate the prognostic signature. Random survival forest analysis screened MRRS with prognostic significance. Multivariate Cox analysis was leveraged to establish the MRRS. Furthermore, the biological functions, gene mutations, and immune landscape were investigated to uncover the underlying mechanisms of the malignancy-related signature. In addition, we used qRT-PCR to explore the expression profile of MRRS-constructed genes in LUAD cells.

Results

The scRNA-seq analysis revealed the markers genes of malignant celltype. The MRRS composed of 7 malignancy-related genes was constructed for each patient, which was shown to be an independent prognostic factor. The results of the GSE68465 and GSE72094 datasets validated MRRS's prognostic value. Further analysis demonstrated that MRRS was involved in oncogenic pathways, genetic mutations, and immune functions. Moreover, the results of qRT-PCR were consistent with bioinformatics analysis.

Conclusion

Our research recognized a novel malignancy-related signature for predicting the prognosis of LUAD patients and highlighted a promising prognostic and treatment marker for LUAD patients.

The surge of HBsAb level in a HBsAg-negative ES-SCLC patient after anlotinib plus atezolizumab treatment: A case report

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumor with endocrine function. For decades, chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been the first-line treatment options. Because of its ability to normalize tumor vessels, anlotinib is recommended as a novel therapy as a third-line treatment. A combination of anti-angiogenic drugs and ICIs can effectively and safely benefit advanced cancer patients. However, immune-related side effects caused by ICIs are common. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation and hepatitis are common during immunotherapy in patients with chronic HBV infection. A 62-year-old man with ES-SCLC who had brain metastasis was described in this case. It is unusual for a HBsAg-negative patient to develop an increase in HBsAb after receiving atezolizumab immunotherapy. Although some researchers have reported the functional cure of HBV by PD-L1 antibody, this is the first case that showed a sustained increased in HBsAb level after anti-PD-L1 therapy. It is related with CD4+ and CD8+ T cells activation and HBV infection microenvironment. Importantly, this could provide a solution to insufficient protective antibody production after vaccination as well as a therapeutic opportunity for HBV patients with cancers.

Anlotinib combined with Sintilimab is win-win cooperation for primary squamous cell carcinoma of the thyroid: A case report and literature review

Background

Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the thyroid (PSCCT) is a rare malignant tumor. The incidence rate of PSCCT is less than 1%. However, the diagnosis and treatment of PSCCT are limited. Surgical resection is considered to be one of the few effective intervention methods. In this article, we reported a case of taking tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for PSCCT.

Case summary

An 80-year-old male was admitted to our hospital with dyspnea, cough, wheezing, and hoarseness for a giant thyroid mass. He underwent bronchoscopy and tracheal stent implantation to alleviate the respiratory obstruction. Then he accepted right partial thyroid and right lymph node biopsy. Postoperative pathology revealed squamous cell carcinoma. Subsequently, he underwent an endoscopy to exclude upper gastrointestinal squamous cell carcinoma. Finally, he was diagnosed with PSCCT. The patient was tentatively treated with a combination of Anlotinib and Sintilimab. After two courses, the tumor volume significantly reduced in MRI images and shrank further after five courses of combined treatment. Unfortunately, the patient died of fulminant liver failure and autoimmune liver disease after 5-month-treatment.

Conclusion

TKIs combined with ICIs may be an effective and novel way for PSCCT treatment, but immune-related complications, especially liver damage, should be cared.

Bioinformatics construction and experimental validation of a cuproptosis-related lncRNA prognostic model in lung adenocarcinoma for immunotherapy response prediction

Cuproptosis is a newly form of cell death. Cuproptosis related lncRNA in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) has also not been fully elucidated. In the present study, we aimed to construct a prognostic signature based on cuproptosis-related lncRNA in LUAD and investigate its association with immunotherapy response. The RNA-sequencing data, clinical information and simple nucleotide variation of LUAD patients were obtained from TCGA database. The LASSO Cox regression was used to construct a prognostic signature. The CIBERSORT, ESTIMATE and ssGSEA algorithms were applied to assess the association between risk score and TME. TIDE score was applied to reflect the efficiency of immunotherapy response. The influence of overexpression of lncRNA TMPO-AS1 on A549 cell was also assessed by in vitro experiments. The lncRNA prognostic signature included AL606834.1, AL138778.1, AP000302.1, AC007384.1, AL161431.1, TMPO-AS1 and KIAA1671-AS1. Low-risk group exhibited much higher immune score, stromal score and ESTIMATE score, but lower tumor purity compared with high-risk groups. Also, low-risk group was associated with a much higher score of immune cells and immune related function sets, indicating an immune activation state. Low-risk patients had relative higher TIDE score and lower TMB. External validation using IMvigor210 immunotherapy cohort demonstrated that low-risk group had a better prognosis and might more easily benefit from immunotherapy. Overexpression of lncRNA TMPO-AS1 promoted the proliferation, migration and invasion of A549 cell line. The novel cuproptosis-related lncRNA signature could predict the prognosis of LUAD patients, and helped clinicians stratify patients appropriate for immunotherapy and determine individual therapeutic strategies.

Low-dose anlotinib confers improved survival in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Anti-angiogenic drugs increase anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the optimal dose of anti-angiogenic drugs remains unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed efficacy and safety data from patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that received PD-1 blockade with low-doses of anlotinib, a highly selective receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor mainly targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, as second or later line therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety profile. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 40 eligible patients were included. The median PFS was 11.4 months. The median OS of the entire cohort was 27.0 months. ORR was achieved in 16 patients (40.0%) and DCR was maintained in 33 patients (82.5%). The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 52.5%, and the most common all grade AE was gastrointestinal reactions, which occurred in four patients (10.0%). Treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicity was observed in one patient (2.5%). Conclusions Low-dose anlotinib may be an effective and well-tolerated anti-angiogenesis partner for combination therapy with ICIs in second-line and later settings for advanced NSCLC.

Anlotinib combined with osimertinib reverses acquired osimertinib resistance in NSCLC by targeting the c-MET/MYC/AXL axis

Favorable clinical evidence suggests that the next trend in new treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will be combination therapies. However, inevitable epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) resistance greatly limits the clinical efficacy of patients carrying EGFR-activating mutants. In this study, we found a patient with clinical osimertinib resistance who regained a positive response after osimertinib plus anlotinib treatment. Two osimertinib-resistant cell lines were constructed, and AXL conferred resistance to osimertinib in NSCLC cell lines. The combined effects of anlotinib and osimertinib restored sensitivity to osimertinib in two osimertinib-resistant NSCLC cell lines and in xenografts. Moreover, anlotinib inhibits the phosphorylation of AXL in both resistant cell lines. Mechanistically, we confirmed that MYC binds to the promoter of AXL to promote its transcription in NSCLC cells, and we demonstrated that anlotinib combined with osimertinib treatment enhances the anti-tumor effect by inactivating the c-MET/MYC/AXL axis to reverse osimertinib resistance in NSCLC. In conclusion, our results provide strong support that this combination therapy may be effective in enhancing the efficacy of treatments in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Downregulation of T-cell cytotoxic marker IL18R1 promotes cancer proliferation and migration and is associated with dismal prognosis and immunity in lung squamous cell carcinoma

Immunotherapy can improve the survival of patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). T cytotoxic cells are one of the main members of the immune microenvironment. Herein, we aimed to identify the roles of T-cell cytotoxic markers interleukin 18 (IL18) receptor 1 (IL18R1) in the LUSC progression using bioinformatics, clinical tissue specimen, and cell experiment. We assessed the association between the IL18R1 expression and immune infiltration and IL18R1-related competing RNA network. The IL18R1 expression was downregulated in the LUSC tissues. The IL18R1 expression downregulation was associated with diagnosis and short overall survival and disease-specific survival, and it was also an independent risk factor for dismal survival time in LUSC. IL18R1-related nomograms predicted the survival time of patients with LUSC. IL18R1 overexpression inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of LUSC cells. The IL18R1 expression was significantly associated with the microenvironment (stromal, immune, and estimate scores), immune cells (such as the T cells, cytotoxic cells, CD8 T cells), and immune cell markers (such as the CD8A, PD-1, and CTLA4) in LUSC. AC091563.1 and RBPMS-AS1 downregulation was positively associated with the IL18R1 expression, negatively associated with the miR-128-3p expression, and associated with short disease-specific survival and progression in LUSC. In conclusion, IL18R1 was significantly downregulated and associated with the prognosis and immune microenvironment. IL18R1 overexpression inhibits the growth and migration of cancer cells in LUSC. Furthermore, AC091563.1 and RBPMS-AS1 might compete with IL18R1 to bind miR-128-3p for participating in LUSC progression. These results showed that IL18R1 is a biomarker for evaluating the prognosis of patients with LUSC.

Effective low-dose Anlotinib induces long-term tumor vascular normalization and improves anti-PD-1 therapy

Anlotinib is a new multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor for tumor angiogenesis, and its monotherapy exhibits a decent clinical efficacy. However, the process of combining Anlotinib and immune checkpoint therapy to achieve optimal antitumor effects while limiting side effects remains unclear. In this study, we found that effective low-dose Anlotinib was sufficient to inhibit tumor growth while reducing side effects compared with high doses. Effective low-dose Anlotinib treatments induced durable tumor vascular normalization and improved anti-PD-1 therapy in both short- and long-term treatment regimens. Mechanistically, the combination therapy increased the proportions of intratumoral CD4⁺ T, CD8⁺ T, and NK cells. Anlotinib-associated antitumor effects were independent of interferon γ; however, the combination therapy required CD8⁺ T cells to suppress tumor growth. Together, these results suggest that the combination of effective low-dose Anlotinib and PD-1 blockade induces durable antitumor effects with fewer side effects. Our findings indicate that antiangiogenic treatments combined with immune checkpoint therapy at an effective low-dose, rather than a tolerable high dose, would be more efficacious and safer.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib with and without EGFR-TKIs or immunotherapy in the treatment of elder patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

Background

Anlotinib is a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor for treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in elder patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods

Elder patients with advanced NSCLC who received anlotinib were enrolled. They were all age ≥ 65 years and with demonstrated records of EGFR gene status. All patients had received treatment with anlotinib or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)/EGFR-TKIs. The efficacy was evaluated according to the efficacy evaluation criteria for solid tumors (RECIST 1.1). Common Adverse Events Evaluation Criteria (CTCAE 4.03) were used to evaluate adverse drug reactions.

Results

A total of 91 patients were included in this study. We divided the patients into two groups (EGFR wild type: 60 patients; EGFR mutation: 31 patients). Among EGFR negative patients, the progression-free survival (PFS) for anlotinib monotherapy and anlotinib combination ICI therapy was 3.2 months and 5.0 months, respectively (P = 0.012). The difference in overall survival (OS) between monotherapy and combination therapy was also significant (9.5 vs. 18.4 months, respectively P = 0.010). Interestingly, we further analyzed differences between patients with hypertension and without hypertension, and found that hypertension was associated with better prognosis (5.7 vs. 1.4 months, P < 0.0001). In the EGFR mutation group, the PFS for anlotinib and EGFR-TKI combination treatment indicated better efficacy than that of anlotinib monotherapy (1.83 months vs. 7.03 months, respectively, P = 0.001). The median OS for monotherapy and combination therapy in the EGFR mutation group showed no statistical difference (28.34 months vs. 31.37 months, P = 0.223). The most common adverse reactions were hypertension, fatigue, and hand-foot syndrome, mainly of grade 1 or 2. No significant increase in adverse reactions was observed in patients  ≥ 70 years of age.

Conclusions

Anlotinib treatment and combination regimens resulted in good efficacy and controllable adverse reactions in elder patients with advanced NSCLC.

Combination of Anti-PD-1 Antibody, Anlotinib and Pegaspargase “Sandwich” With Radiotherapy in Localized Natural Killer/T Cell Lymphoma

Asparaginase/pegaspargase containing regimens combined with radiotherapy are highly effective and considered the cornerstone of localized Natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTL) treatment. However, these chemotherapy regimens inevitably cause relatively high incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Herein we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combined regimen of anti-PD-1 antibody, anlotinib and pegaspargase “sandwich” with radiotherapy in localized NKTL. Anti-PD-1 antibody and pegaspargase at 2500 U/m² were administered on day 1, while anlotinib (12 mg once a day) was orally administered on days 1-14. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. All the eight patients included received 3 cycles of the regimen followed by radiotherapy and an additional 3 cycles. The overall response rate was 100%, and the complete response rate was 87.5%. With a median follow-up time of 35.5 months (range, 34.03-40.90 months), median PFS and OS times were not reached. The 3-year PFS and OS rates were 100% and 100%, respectively. All patients were alive at the last follow-up. No treatment-related death and no grade 4 TRAE was reported. No grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was detected, and half of the patients didn’t report any hematological toxicity. This study indicates that anti-PD-1 antibody combined with anlotinib and pegaspargase is a promising chemoradiotherapy regimen for localized NTKL, with mild toxicity and good tolerance.

Clinical outcomes and safety of osimertinib plus anlotinib for patients with previously treated EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC: A retrospective study

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Although osimertinib achieved convincing efficacy for patients with EGFR T790M-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as second-line treatment in the AURA3 clinical trials, patients developed drug resistance ultimately. Therefore, the present study was to investigate the clinical outcome and safety of osimertinib plus anlotinib for patients with previously treated EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC.

METHODS

Designed as a retrospective study, this study consecutively included a total of 33 patients with advanced NSCLC who possessed a EGFR T790M-positive mutation and progressed after the first-line therapy. Eligible patients were treated with osimertinib plus anlotinib. Baseline characteristics of the patients were collected during hospitalization. Efficacy of the combination regimen was assessed with the change of target lesion using imaging evidence according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, and all the patients were followed up regularly. Adverse reactions were collected and documented during the treatment. Univariate analysis according to baseline characteristic subgroups was performed using log-rank test, and multivariate analysis was carried out by Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The best overall response of the patients during osimertinib and anlotinib combination indicated that complete response was found in one patient, partial response was observed in 26 patients, stable disease was noted in 5 patients and progressive disease was reported in one patient. Therefore, objective response rate (ORR) of the combination regimen was 81.8% (95%CI: 64.5%-93.0%), and disease control rate (DCR) was 97.0% (95%CI: 84.2%-99.9%). Furthermore, the median progression-free survival (PFS) of the 33 patients with NSCLC was 15.5 months (95%CI: 6.19-24.81). In addition, the median overall survival (OS) of the 33 patients with NSCLC was 23.8 months (95% CI: 17.67-29.93). Safety profile suggested that the most common adverse reactions of the patients with NSCLC who received anlotinib plus osimertinib were hypertension (63.6%), fatigue (57.6%), diarrhoea (48.5%%), dermal toxicity (39.4%) and proteinuria (33.3%). Interestingly, multivariate Cox regression analysis for PFS demonstrated that ECOG performance status was an independent factor to predict the PFS of the combination regimen.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Osimertinib plus anlotinib regimen preliminarily exhibited encouraging clinical outcomes and acceptable safety profile for patients with previously treated EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC numerically. This conclusion should be validated in prospective clinical trials.

Clinical Activity and Safety of Anlotinib Combined with PD-1 Blockades for Patients with Previously Treated Small Cell Lung Cancer

Objective

Anlotinib was the standard monotherapy for patients with previously treated small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in recent years. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade combined with antiangiogenic targeted drugs have proved to play a synergistic action for cancer treatment clinically. Consequently, the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with PD-1 blockades for patients with previously treated SCLC.

Methods

A total of 36 patients with SCLC who were treated with at least one previous systemic chemotherapy regimen participated in this study retrospectively. All the patients were administered with anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades therapy. Clinical activity was assessed according to the change of target lesion by imaging evidence and all the subjects were followed up regularly. Safety profiles were collected and documented during the treatment. Univariate analysis was carried out using Log rank test and multivariate analysis was adjusted by Cox regression analysis.

Results

All the 36 patients with previously treated SCLC were able to have their efficacy and safety profile evaluated. The best overall response of the combination regimen showed that complete response was observed in one patient, partial response was noted in 9 patients, stable disease was reported in 19 patients, progressive disease was seen in 7 patients. Therefore, the objective response rate (ORR) of the 36 patients was 27.8% (95% CI: 14.2-45.2%), disease control rate (DCR) was 80.6% (95% CI: 64.0-91.8%). Regarding the prognostic data, the median PFS and OS of the 36 patients was 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.13-6.07) and 9.3 months (95% CI: 3.30-15.30), respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse reactions were hypertension (52.8%), fatigue (47.2%), diarrhea (38.9%), hand and foot reaction (38.9%) and dermal toxicity (33.3%). Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis for PFS indicated that ECOG performance status was an independent factor to predict PFS.

Conclusion

Anlotinib combined with PD-1 blockades regimen preliminarily demonstrated encouraging efficacy and tolerable safety for patients with previously treated SCLC. The conclusion should be validated in prospective clinical trials subsequently.

Impact of treatment timing and sequence of immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have demonstrated that anti-angiogenic agents (AAs) have the ability to regulate immune-related cells in the tumor microenvironment and may affect the clinical effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, we investigated the drug interaction between ICI and AA for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase-Scopus, and ISI Web of Science before August 23, 2021. ICI and AA therapy included the concomitant and sequential use of ICIs and AAs. The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of patients who received ICI and AA therapy were evaluated and compared to those of patients who received either monotherapy. Subgroup analyses were performed to clarify the cause of heterogeneity; the timing and sequence of ICI and AA administration were predefined as the subgroups.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies involving 2414 patients were included in the meta-analysis. ICI and AA therapy had significantly higher ORR than either monotherapy (OR [95% CI]: 0.61 [0.50-0.74]; p < 0.001; I² = 29%). PFS and OS were favorable benefits in ICI and AA therapy; however, significant heterogeneity was identified in these analyses (I² = 80% and 59%, respectively). According to the administration timing and sequence, ICI immediately after AA showed no PFS and OS benefits compared to ICI monotherapy (HR [95 % CI]: 1.54 [1.14-2.08] and 1.50 [1.04-2.15], respectively), whereas favorable PFS and OS were demonstrated when AA was concomitantly administered with ICI (HR [95 % CI]: 0.57 [0.43-0.76] and 0.80 [0.61-1.05], respectively) or when AA was administered immediately after ICI (HR [95 % CI]: 0.58 [0.34-1.00] and 0.56 [0.40-0.80], respectively).

CONCLUSION

ICI and AA therapy can provide favorable clinical effects compared to either monotherapy; however, ICI administered immediately after AA may not show survival benefits.

Safety and efficacy of ICI plus anlotinib vs. anlotinib alone as third-line treatment in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus anlotinib as third-line treatment in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

METHODS

A total of 120 patients with ES-SCLC who were admitted to Shandong Cancer Hospital between January 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into the observation group (n = 62) and the control group (n = 58) according to their different treatment plans. The observation group was given ICI plus anlotinib, while the control group was given anlotinib alone. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). An efficacy evaluation was carried out every 6 weeks. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors. The main treatment-related adverse events were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

RESULTS

In the observation group and the control group, the DCRs were 87.1% and 72.4% (p = 0.044), and the ORRs were 19.4% and 6.9% (p = 0.045), respectively. The median PFS was longer in the observation group (7.5 months) than in the control group (4.6 months) (p = 0.0033). In Cox regression analysis, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, brain metastases and metastatic sites were prognostic factors of ICI plus anlotinib. Compared with the control group, grade 1-2 immune-related pneumonia and hypothyroidism of patients in the observation group were significantly increased (p < 0.05), but grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse reactions were not significantly increased (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ICI plus anlotinib showed promising efficacy and manageable toxicity in third-line treatment of ES-SCLC.

Effect of prior thoracic radiotherapy on prognosis in relapsed small cell lung cancer patients treated with anlotinib: a subgroup analysis of the ALTER 1202 trial

Background

In ALTER 1202, anlotinib prolonged the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The aim of this study was to explore the effect of front-line thoracic radiotherapy (RT) on the benefits of anlotinib as a third-line-or-beyond treatment.

Methods

This was a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial (ALTER 1202). The participants were divided into RT (previous thoracic RT) and non-RT subgroups. The outcomes included PFS, OS, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

Results

In the ALTER 1202 trial, 68 participants (anlotinib, n=46; placebo, n=22) received RT and 51 participants (anlotinib, n=35; placebo, n=16) did not. PFS was longer for anlotinib versus placebo in both the RT (5.49 vs. 0.69 months; P<0.001) and non-RT (2.83 vs. 0.76 months; P<0.001) subgroups. In the RT subgroup, the OS was longer for anlotinib vs. placebo (9.49 vs. 4.90 months; P=0.039). No differences were found in the ORR, but the DCR was higher in the anlotinib arm of the RT subgroup compared with the placebo arm (73.9% vs. 9.1%, P<0.001) and the non-RT subgroup (68.6% vs. 18.8%; P=0.002).

Conclusions

In relapsed SCLC patients with previous thoracic RT, anlotinib might have DCR, PFS, and OS benefits compared with placebo. In those without previous thoracic RT patients, anlotinib might have DCR and PFS benefits compared with placebo. The safety was similar between anlotinib and placebo groups.

The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved for treating small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, the efficacy and safety profile of ICIs for relapsed SCLC remains under investigation. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of ICIs in the treatment of relapsed SCLC patients.

METHODS

The databases, including Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane library, were systematically searched to retrieve potential eligible studies from the establishment of the database to May 2021. The primary outcomes were survival, treatment responses, and safety. Randomized controlled trials and real-world studies that met the inclusion criteria were included. The RevMan 5.4 and R software were used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of eight articles involving 653 patients was included. Meta-analyses results showed that the overall response rate (objective response rate [ORR]) of the ICIs group was 0.12 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07-0.18). The median overall survival was 7.97 (95% CI: 5.94-9.47) months, while the progression-free survival was 1.70 (95% CI: 1.40-2.28) months. Although chemotherapy showed a favourable ORR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.39-1.41; p = 0.36) and a significantly better disease control rate (OR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.11-0.70; p = 0.007), patients treated with ICIs had a reduced risk of mortality (hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.73-1.03; p = 0.10). With regards to adverse events (AEs), the rates of any AEs and ≥grade 3 AEs were 0.56 (95% CI: 0.52-0.60) and 0.13 (95%CI: 0.06-0.20), respectively.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

For relapsed SCLC patients, the administration of ICIs resulted in a similar survival outcome and acceptable safety compared with chemotherapy. Further studies are needed to explore potential biomarkers for relapsed SCLC patients who may benefit from immunotherapy.

Anlotinib combined with anti-PD-1 antibody, camrelizumab for advanced NSCLCs after multiple lines treatment: An open-label, dose escalation and expansion study

OBJECTIVES

Combined therapy should be invested for those patients who are refractory to first-line therapy. Anti-angiogenic agents could enhance tumor immunity response. We designed a phase IB clinical trial and analyzed the effectiveness and safety of anlotinib combined with PD-1inhibitors Camrelizumab for multi-line pretreated and failed advanced NSCLC to explore the synergistic effect of anti-angiogenic agents and immunotherapy.

METHODS

All enrolled patients should receive camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. Eligible patients were randomized successively to three dose cohorts of Anlotinib in a dose escalation clinical setting. Once maximal tolerable dose was established, the primary end point of this study was progression-free survival, overall survival and safety. Risk factor was an exploratory end point.

RESULTS

The identified expansion dose for anlotinib was 12 mg. The median PFS of ITT patients was 8.2 months (95% CI, 4.3-12.1 months). And the mOS was 12.7 months (95% CI, 10.2-15.1 months). There was significant difference of mPFS between the 8 mg cohort and the 12 mg cohort (5.6 m vs.11.0 m, p = 0.04). Patients with brain metastasis had a significantly higher risk of death (HR 5.90; 95% CI 2.01-17.30; P = 0.001). Patients whose ECOG was 0 and 1 had a significantly lower risk of death (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.14-0.91; P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib plus camrelizumab had shown promising efficacy and manageable toxicity as a second-line or later-line treatment for NSCLCs, especially in the 12 mg cohorts. Large-scale phase III clinical trials are needed to further explore the rational combination models and biomarkers.

Comparisons of Underlying Mechanisms, Clinical Efficacy and Safety Between Anti-PD-1 and Anti-PD-L1 Immunotherapy: The State-of-the-Art Review and Future Perspectives

Over the past decade, diverse PD-1/PD-L1 blockades have demonstrated significant clinical benefit in across a wide range of tumor and cancer types. With the increasing number of PD-1/PD-L1 blockades available in the market, differences between the clinical performance of each of them started to be reported. Here, we provide a comprehensive historical and biological perspective regarding the underlying mechanism and clinical performance of PD-1/PD-L1 blockades, with an emphasis on the comparisons of their clinical efficacy and safety. The real-world evidence indicated that PD-1 blockade may be more effective than the PD-L1, though no significant differences were found as regards to their safety profiles. Future head-to-head studies are warranted for direct comparison between them. Finally, we summarize the yet to be elucidated questions and future promise of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy, including a need to explore novel biomarkers, novel combinatorial strategies, and their clinical use on chronic infection.

The Application of Combined Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Modalities in Previously Treated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients and the Associations Thereof With the Lung Immune Prognostic Index

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy remains the standard of care for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer. However, few reports have compared the clinical benefits of second-line ICIs alone with those of ICIs combined with other therapies, including anti-angiogenesis therapy or chemotherapy.

Methods

Patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer who received ICIs were retrospectively reviewed. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, and safety were assessed. Complete blood cell counts and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were measured before and after ICI treatment.

Results

Of 120 patients, 75 were treated with ICI monotherapy, 26 with ICIs plus anti-angiogenic therapy (ICI+A), and 19 with ICIs plus chemotherapy (ICI+C). The objective response rate was significantly higher in the ICI+C group (57.9%) than ICI monotherapy (26.3%) and ICI+A (31.8%) groups. The depth of response was significantly greater in the ICI+C (-35.1%) than ICI+A (-2.04%) and ICI monotherapy (3.963%) groups. ICI+C afforded a better PFS compared with the ICI monotherapy and ICI+A groups (8.5 vs. 4.6 and 4.1 months, respectively). Notably, the pre- and post-treatment peripheral neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios and serum LDH levels were negatively correlated with the PFS of the entire cohort. More importantly, the pretreatment lung immune prognostic index (neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio ≥ 4 and LDH level ≥ upper limit of normal) satisfactorily predicted the responses to ICI-based strategies. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 65.3%, 92.3%, and 94.7% of patients in the ICI monotherapy, ICI+A, and ICI+C groups, respectively. Grade 3-5 AEs were more common in the combination therapy groups (ICI+A, 19.2%; ICI+C, 21%; ICI monotherapy, 4%).

Conclusion

In second-line settings and beyond, ICIs combined with chemotherapy prolonged survival, with tolerable AEs. Addition of anti-angiogenic agents to ICIs did not afford any additional benefits. Further prospective studies are warranted.