Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: a comparison of opening and closing wedge osteotomy

Total knee arthroplasty post-high tibial osteotomy, results of an early experience from a North African arthroplasty unit, and a comprehensive review of the literature

PURPOSE

To report an early experience after converting HTO to TKA by reporting the incidence of functional, radiological, and complications in a single surgeon case series from a North African specialized arthroplasty unit.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2020, 33 knees in 31 patients (two bilateral) were operated upon, 24 females and seven males, had a mean age of 65 ± 4.5 years; 17 (51.5%) knees had medial wedge opening (WMO), while 16 (48.5%) had lateral wedge closure (LWC) osteotomies. The mean time from HTO to TKA was 8.1 ± 3.3 years. A posterior stabilized (PS) implant was used in 31 (93.9%), while in 2 (6.1%), a varus-valgus constrained (VVC) implant was used. A tibial stem was needed in 13 (39.4%) knees. The functional assessment was performed according to the Knee Society Scoring System (KSS). The radiographic assessment included the anatomical femorotibial angle (aFTA) for alignment, the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and the tibial slope (TS).

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 4.3 ± 1.1 years, the KSS knee and function sub-scores improved from a preoperative mean of 41 ± 8.9 (26 to 57) and 37.7 ± 9.2 (25 to 55) points to 91.3 ± 3.8 (81 to 94) and 85.5 ± 5 (80 to 95) points at the last follow-up, respectively (P < 0.05). The preoperative knee flexion improved from a mean of 84.5° ± 15.9 (55 to 110) to 110.6° ± 9.3 (95 to 125) (P < 0.05). The aFTA improved from a preoperative mean of 182.2° ± 10.3 (164 to 205) to a postoperative mean of 186° ± 2.6 (179 to 190) (P < 0.05). The MPTA changed from a preoperative mean of 88.4° ± 6.7 (77 to 102) to a postoperative (tibial component alignment) mean of 90° ± 1.7 (85 to 94) (P < 0.05). The mean preoperative TS changed from 80.9° ± 7.3 (68 to 96) to a mean postoperative of 86.9° ± 1.3 (83 to 89) (P < 0.05). Non-progressive radiolucent lines were detected at the tibial component in four (12%) knees. Complications were reported in seven (21.2%) knees; no revision was needed in any knee.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' early experience showed improved functional and radiological outcomes; however, the complication incidence was relatively high, but no knees required revision. A longer follow-up is mandatory to prove the consistency of the results.

Comparing preemptive injection of peri-articular-multimodal drug with oral celexocib for postoperative pain management in total knee arthroplasty: A randomized clinical trial

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with tremendous postoperative pain, and pain relief should concisely be considered. This study aims to compare the efficacy of preemptive periarticular multimodal drug injection versus placebo and oral celecoxib on postoperative pain control after TKA.

Materials and Methods

This study is a randomized clinical trial on 146 patients candidate for TKA who were randomly allocated to three treatment groups, including (1) a cocktail consisting of bupivacaine, morphine, epinephrine, and ketorolac (n = 48), (2) only epinephrine (placebo group) (n = 49), and (3) 400 mg celecoxib orally (control group) (n = 49) using the Random Allocation software. The injections and oral therapy were performed within 15 min before the surgical procedure. The study's primary outcome was the Knee Society Score (KSS) calculated at baseline, within 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Range of motion (ROM) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to assess pain intensity as the other primary outcomes were evaluated before the procedure, within 24 h, 48 h, and 6 weeks postoperatively.

Results

The three studied groups were similar regarding demographic characteristics, including age (P = 0.33), gender distribution (P = 0.65), and involved knee side (P = 0.94). Baseline comparison of KSS (P = 0.39), VAS (P = 0.24), and ROM (P = 0.37) among the groups revealed insignificant differences. All the studied groups showed a statistically significant trend of improvement in KSS, VAS, and ROM (P < 0.001), while the comparison of the three groups in terms of KSS (P = 0.001), VAS (P < 0.001), and ROM (P < 0.001) revealed remarkable superiority of multimodal injection to the other treatments.

Conclusion

Preemptive periarticular multimodal drug injection, including bupivacaine, morphine, epinephrine, and ketorolac, can cause considerable postoperative pain relief and better ROM achievement in comparison to placebo or oral celecoxib.

Complications, Implant Survivorships, and Functional Outcomes of Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty With Prior Hardware

BACKGROUND

End-stage knee osteoarthritis with retained periarticular hardware is a frequent scenario. Conversion total knee arthroplasty (TKA) leads to excellent outcomes, but poses unique challenges. The evidence supporting retention versus removal of hardware during TKA is controversial.

METHODS

Patients who underwent TKA with prior hardware between January 2009 and December 2019 were identified. A total of 148 patients underwent TKA with prior hardware. The mean follow-up was 60 months (range, 24-223). Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to study correlations among factors and surgical-related complications, prosthesis failures, and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

The complication rate was 28 of 148 (18.9%). The use of a quadriceps snips in addition to a medial parapatellar arthrotomy was associated with a higher complication (odds ratio: 20.7, P < .05), implant failures (odds ratio: 13.9, P < .05), and lower the Veterans Rand 12 Mental Score (VR-12 MS) (-14.8, P < .05). Hardware removal versus retention and use of single versus multiple incisions were not associated with complications or prosthesis failures. Removal of all hardware was associated with significantly higher (+7.3, P < .05) VR-12 MS compared to retention of all hardware.

CONCLUSIONS

TKA with prior hardware was associated with more complications, implant failures, and lower VR-12 MS when a more constrained construct or quadriceps snip was performed. This probably reflects the level of difficulty of the procedure rather than the surgical approach used. Hardware removal or retention was not associated with complications or implant failures; however, removal rather than retention of all prior hardware is associated with increased general health outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, cohort without control.

Higher knee survivorship in young patients with monocompartmental osteoarthritis and constitutional deformity treated by high tibial osteotomy then total knee arthroplasty compared to an early total knee arthroplasty : a comparative study at a minimum follow-up of ten years

AIMS

The use of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) to delay total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in young patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and constitutional deformity remains debated. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of TKA after HTO compared to TKA without HTO, using the time from the index OA surgery as reference (HTO for the study group, TKA for the control group).

METHODS

This was a case-control study of consecutive patients receiving a posterior-stabilized TKA for OA between 1996 and 2010 with previous HTO. A total of 73 TKAs after HTO with minimum ten years' follow-up were included. Cases were matched with a TKA without previous HTO for age at the time of the HTO. All revisions were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed using revision of metal component as the endpoint. The Knee Society Score, range of motion, and patient satisfaction were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 13 years (SD 3) after TKA in both groups. The 20-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimate was 98.6% in TKA post-HTO group (HTO as timing reference) and 81.4% in control group (TKA as timing reference) (p = 0.030). There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes, radiological outcomes, and complications at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

At the same delay from index surgery (HTO or TKA), a strategy of HTO followed by TKA had superior knee survivorship compared to early TKA at long term in young patients.Level of evidence: IIICite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(2):62-71.

Alignment prior to total knee arthroplasty in high tibial osteotomy patients has no effect on subsequent functional outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The influence of prior high tibial osteotomy (HTO) on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) functional outcomes remains widely debated. Alignment of failed HTO can pose technical challenges with subsequent TKA. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of HTO alignment on the clinical outcomes of subsequent TKA. The secondary aim was to compare the time to TKA for each HTO alignment type.

METHODS

Patients who underwent TKA post lateral closing-wedge HTO for symptomatic medial compartment osteoarthritis between 2001 and 2014 were prospectively followed up for 2 years. A total of 159 patients were assigned to three groups based on their pre-TKA femora tibia angles using long lower limb radiographs: varus alignment (VrA) ≤ 3^o valgus, neutral alignment (NA) 3-9^o valgus alignment, valgus alignment (VlA) ≥ 9^o valgus. Functional outcomes were quantified using Knee Society Function Score and Knee Scores (KSFS and KSKS respectively), modified Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Short Form 36 Physical Component Score (SF-36 PCS), and SF-36 Mental Component Score (SF-36 MCS). Pre-operative and post-operative knee range of motion were also measured.

RESULTS

Mean pre-TKA KSKS in VrA patients (35 ± 18) was significantly lower than both NA (51 ± 19) and VlA (40 ± 21) patients (p < .05). Otherwise, there was no significant difference in functional outcome scores (KSFS, KSKS, OKS, SF-36 PCS and SF-36 MCS) or range of motion at 6 months and 2 years post-TKA. The mean duration from HTO to TKA was 12 ± 7 years with no significant differences between VrA, NA, and VlA HTO to TKA (13 ± 7 years, 13 ± 6 years and12 ± 8 years respectively, p > .05).

CONCLUSION

HTO alignment did not influence time to subsequent TKA. HTO alignment did not influence early outcomes as well as radiological outcomes of subsequent TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Less risk of conversion to total knee arthroplasty without significant clinical and survivorship difference for opening-wedge high tibial osteotomies in varus knee deformities at 10-year minimum follow-up compared to closing-wedge high tibial osteotomies

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and survivorship at minimum 10-year follow-up of patients undergoing primary valgisation high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for medial osteoarthritis (OA), treated by Opening-Wedge HTO (OW-HTO) or Closing-Wedge HTO (CW-HTO).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients presenting to a single institution undergoing HTO for isolated medial compartment OA. Two hundred and twenty three HTOs for isolated medial tibio-femoral OA were performed between January 2002 and December 2010. Patients were eligible if they had minimum 10-year follow-up and received either a CW or OW-HTO. Fifteen (6.7%) patients died and twenty-five (11.2%) were lost to follow-up. One hundred and eighty three (82.1%) patients were included in the final analysis and divided into two groups: OW-HTO (96/183; 52.4%) and CW-HTO (87/183; 47.6%). Range of motion, KSS, KOOS scores, and conversion to TKA rate were analyzed between groups. Both groups were comparable regarding age, arthrosis stage, gender, ASA score and BMI at the time of HTO. Survival analysis was conducted with re-intervention for TKA as the end point.

RESULTS

At the time of HTO, mean age was 55 years ± 7.9 (27-73.9) with 72.7% of patients being male. The mean follow-up was 13.3 years ± 2.7 (10-19). Sixty-four (34.9%) patients underwent TKA at a mean delay of 9.3 years ± 3 (3-16). The conversion to TKA rate was significantly higher in the CW-HTO group versus the OW-HTO group: 42.5% (37/87) versus 28.1% (27/96) (p = 0.04). The survival at 15-year follow-up was 59.2% in the OW-HTO group versus 54.6% in the CW-HTO group (n.s.). At 13-year follow-up, KSS Function score was significantly better in the OW-HTO (90.9 versus 82.4; p = 0.007). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the KOOS score, KSS Knee Score and complication rate.

CONCLUSION

At mean follow-up of 13 years, no significant clinical and survivorship difference was observed between the two groups. The conversion to TKA was significantly lower following OW-HTO. Minor correction was associated with risk of requiring subsequent TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective case series, IV.

Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty

»

Conversion total knee arthroplasty (TKA) represents a heterogeneous group of procedures and most commonly includes TKA performed after ligamentous reconstruction, periarticular open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), high tibial osteotomy (HTO), and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

»

Relative to patients undergoing primary TKA, patients undergoing conversion TKA often have longer operative times and higher surgical complexity, which may translate into higher postoperative complication rates.

»

There is mixed evidence on implant survivorship and patient-reported outcome measures when comparing conversion TKA and primary TKA, with some studies noting no differences between the procedures and others finding decreased survivorship and outcome scores for conversion TKA.

»

By gaining an improved understanding of the unique challenges facing patients undergoing conversion TKA, clinicians may better set patient expectations, make intraoperative adjustments, and guide postoperative care.

High Midterm Survival Rate of Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty After High Tibial Osteotomy: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is technically more demanding than TKA in a native knee. Studies have reported increased intraoperative and postoperative complication of TKA with previous HTO. The aim of this study is to compare the survival and complication rates and functional outcomes of uncemented TKA with previous HTO to primary TKA at our institution over a decade.

METHODS

This case-control study included 41 uncemented TKA after HTO between 2002 and 2012. For each case, 2 control patients were matched based on age and gender without previous HTO. The 2 groups were comparable for body mass index, as well as preoperative functional scores.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 7.8 ± 2.4 (range, 5-13.6) years. At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in functional outcomes or radiological imaging, particularly the rate of radiological loosening. There was no significant difference in complications (9; 22%) in the group of TKA after HTO vs the control group (14; 17%). One revision was performed in the group of TKA after HTO for septic loosening, and no revisions in the control group. The survival rate at a mean follow-up of 8 years was 97.6% in the group TKA after HTO vs 100% in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Uncemented TKAs following HTO have no significant difference in functional and radiological outcomes and survivorship compared to uncemented primary TKA at midterm follow-up.

A meta-analysis of total knee arthroplasty following high tibial osteotomy versus primary total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following high tibial osteotomy (HTO) versus primary TKA.

METHODS

Relevant trials were identified via a search of Ovid, PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 10 January 2019. A meta-analysis was performed to compare postoperative outcomes between revising HTO to TKA (RHTO) and primary TKA (PTKA) with respect to Knee Society Score (KSS), 10-year survival rate, operative time, flexion and extension angle, infection rate and radiographic results.

RESULTS

Sixteen of 340 studies involving 103,552 adult patients (RHTO group, n = 3955; PTKA group, n = 99,597) were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Compared with primary TKA, revising HTO to TKA required longer operative time and had a higher infection rate (P < 0.05). The PTKA group had better flexion angle than the RHTO group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the KSS, extension angle, radiographic results and 10-year survival rate (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients who undergo conversion of HTO to TKA have similar 10-year survival rate, KSS, extension angle and radiographic results as patients who undergo primary TKA. However, conversion of HTO to TKA required longer operative time and had a higher infection rate than performing primary TKA. Moreover, conversion of HTO to TKA is associated with poorer flexion angle than primary TKA.

Radiographic changes and clinical outcomes after open and closed wedge high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine changes in radiological variables and clinical outcomes between open and closed wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO and CWHTO, respectively), which have ongoing controversial issues in numerous quantitative clinical studies.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for suitable controlled trials between Jan 1, 1999, and Feb 2, 2018. The inclusion criteria included studies written in English, studies with a level of evidence of I-IV, and studies presenting comparisons between OWHTO and CWHTO. The main clinical and radiographic results were extracted and pooled using Stata 12.0.

RESULTS

After searching for and screening trials, 28 trials involving 2840 knees were eligible for the meta-analysis. After OWHTO or CWHTO, clinical scores, including the American Knee Society Score, Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score, Lysholm score, and Visual Analog Scale pain score, improved (p < 0.05), but the range of motion was unchanged (p > 0.05). The anatomical femorotibial angle (SMD 0.04, 95% CI - 0.66 to 0.74) and hip-knee-ankle angle (SMD 0.11, 95% CI - 0.11 to 0.33) data suggested that the OWHTO and CWHTO groups were similar in function of correction. Posterior tibial slope increased (SMD - 0.71, 95% CI - 1.04 to - 0.37) after OWHTO but decreased (SMD 0.72, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.08) after CWHTO. OWHTO decreased patellar height (p < 0.05), while patellar height did not change significantly after CWHTO (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis indicates that compared with CWHTO, OWHTO increases the posterior slope, decreases the patellar height, and provides a similar accuracy of correction; however, CWHTO leads to a decreased posterior slope and an unchanged patellar height. Therefore, programs should be personalized and customized for the specific situation of each patient.

Intra-articular injections of expanded mesenchymal stem cells with and without addition of platelet-rich plasma are safe and effective for knee osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of intra-articular injections of autologous expanded mesenchymal stromal stem cells alone (MSCs), or in combination with platelet-rich plasma (MSCs + PRP), in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Eighteen patients (57.6 ± 9.6 years) with radiographic symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (Dejour grades II-IV) were randomized to receive intra-articular injections of MSCs (n = 9) or MSCs + PRP (n = 9). Injections were performed 2-3 weeks after bone marrow aspiration (± 80-100 ml) which was obtained from both posterior iliac crests.

RESULTS

The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) improved significantly throughout the 12 months for both groups (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences between groups were found in KOOS subscales and global score improvements at 12-month end-point (n.s.). The MSCs group showed significant improvements in the pain, function and daily living activities, and sports and recreational activities subscales (p < 0.05). Similarly, the MSCs + PRP group showed significant improvements in the pain, function and daily living activities and quality of life subscales (p < 0.05). The average number of fibroblast colony forming units (CFU-F) was 56.8 + 21.9 for MSCs group and 50.7 ± 21.7 for MSCs + PRP group. Minimal adverse effects were seen in both groups (10 adverse events, in 5 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-articular injections of expanded MSCs alone or in combination with PRP are safe and have a beneficial effect on symptoms in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Adding PRP to the MSCs injections did not provide additional benefit. These results are encouraging and support the recommendation of this minimally invasive procedure in patients with knee osteoarthritis, without requiring hospitalization. The CFU-F results may be used as reference for future research.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective cohort study, Level II.

Clinical Management in Early OA

Knee osteoarthritis affects an important percentage of the population throughout their life. Several factors seem to be related to the development of knee osteoarthritis including genetic predisposition, gender, age, meniscal deficiency, lower limb malalignments, joint instability, cartilage defects, and increasing sports participation. The latter has contributed to a higher prevalence of early onset of knee osteoarthritis at younger ages with this active population demanding more consistent and durable outcomes. The diagnosis is complex and the common signs and symptoms are often cloaked at these early stages. Classification systems have been developed and are based on the presence of knee pain and radiographic findings coupled with magnetic resonance or arthroscopic evidence of early joint degeneration. Nonsurgical treatment is often the first-line option and is mainly based on daily life adaptations, weight loss, and exercise, with pharmacological agents having only a symptomatic role. Surgical treatment shows positive results in relieving the joint symptomatology, increasing the knee function and delaying the development to further degenerative stages. Biologic therapies are an emerging field showing early promising results; however, further high-level research is required.

Early weight bearing versus delayed weight bearing in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The need for a period of non-weight bearing after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy remains controversial. It is hypothesized that immediate weight bearing after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy would have no difference in functional scores at one year compared to delayed weight bearing.

METHODS

Fifty patients, median age 54 years (range 40-65), with medial compartment osteoarthritis, underwent a medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy utilizing a locking plate without bone grafting. Patients were randomized into an Immediate or a Delayed (2 months) weight bearing group. All patients were assessed at one-year follow-up and the two groups compared. The primary outcome measure was the IKS score. Secondary outcome measures included the IKDC score, the VAS pain score and rate of complications.

RESULTS

The functional scores significantly improved in both groups. The IKS score increased from 142 ± 31 to 171 ± 26 in the Immediate group (p < 0.001) and from 148 ± 22 to 178 ± 23 in the Delayed group (p < 0.001). The IKDC score increased from 49 ± 17 pre-operatively to 68 ± 14 one-year post-operatively in the Immediate group (p < 0.0001) and from 44 ± 16 to 69 ± 19 in the Delayed group (p < 0.001). The average VAS for pain 2 months after surgery was 3 ± 3 in the Immediate group and 3 ± 2 in the Delayed (n.s.). There was no significant difference between the two groups in any of the outcome measures. The mean mechanical femorotibial angle changed from 6° of varus (0°-15° of varus, SD = 3°) to 4° of valgus (5°-11° of valgus, SD = 3°) in the Immediate group and from 5° of varus (0°-10° of varus, SD = 3°) to 3° of valgus (2° of varus to 8° of valgus, SD = 3°) in the Delayed group. No difference was seen between groups, and no loss of correction was observed in any patient. Two cases of non-union occurred, one in each group. One infection and one deep vein thrombosis occurred in the Immediate group.

CONCLUSION

Immediate weight bearing after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy had no effect on functional scores at 1 year follow-up and did not significantly increase the complication rate. Immediate weight bearing after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy appears to be safe and can allow some patients a quicker return to activities of daily living and a decreased convalescence period.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Total knee arthroplasty after opening- versus closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy. A 135-case series with minimum 5-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is effective in treating isolated medial osteoarthritis of the knee, but subsequent deterioration is inevitable, and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is then an option. The present study sought to compare TKA following medial opening-wedge HTO (OW-HTO) versus lateral closing-wedge HTO (CW-HTO) in terms of intraoperative data and clinical results. The study hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in clinical results or complications in TKA following OW-HTO or CW-HTO.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective multicenter (9 centers) study was conducted for the French Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (SoFCOT), including 135 TKAs following HTO (58 OW and 77 CW) at a minimum 5 years' follow-up. Mean interval between HTO and TKA was 134 months and was longer in case of CW-HTO (P<0.0001). Mean age at TKA was 65.4 years and older in case of CW-HTO (P=0.021). Tibial slope was greater in case of OW-HTO (P=0.024). Prior to TKA, 55.7% of patients could walk without canes, 98.4% found stairs difficult or impossible and only 19.1% could manage a walking distance greater than 1000m. Mean flexion was 110°; 54.2% of patients showed frontal knee stability and 87.8% sagittal stability; 60.1% had a mechanical axis in varus, without difference according to OW- or CW-HTO.

RESULTS

Hardware was almost systematically removed (in 98.5% of cases): in the same step for OW-HTO (P=0.018) or often in 2 steps for CW-HTO. The primary approach was generally re-used (54.2%), but less frequently in the CW-HTO group (P=0.0004). Lateral or medial ligament release was not associated in respectively 78.2% and 79.7% of cases. The TKA implant was usually without stem (87.2%) and was fitted using a conventional technique (74.4%). At a mean 87 months' follow-up, 78.5% of patients could walk without canes, stairs were still difficult or impossible for 67%, and 74.1% could now walk further than 1000m; mean flexion was 110.5°. Overall, 91.5% of patients showed frontal knee stability and 98.2% sagittal stability, without difference according to OW- or CW-HTO. There were 15 complications within 3 months, more often in the OW-HTO group (12.3%) although not significantly, and with no difference in severity. Late complications comprised loosening (5.5%) and infection (3.6%) and were more frequent in the CW-HTO group (12%) (P<0.05).

DISCUSSION

The study hypothesis was partially confirmed. The only technical differences concerned hardware removal, often performed in two steps in case of CW-HTO, and TKA approach, which differed from the primary approach in case of CW-HTO. Clinical results were comparable between OW- and CW-HTO, but late complications were more frequent in the CW-HTO group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; comparative retrospective study.

Total knee arthroplasty conversion after a failed lateral closing wedge high tibial osteotomy with knee hyperextension and secondary ankle degeneration: A case report

RATIONALE

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) has been used widely for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis to correct the deformity and relieve symptoms, especially in young patients who are willing to maintain the high activity level. However, the change of bone morphology, ligament imbalance, limb malalignment, and other complications may influence the short-term outcomes of HTO. Some cases may even require conversion to TKA shortly after HTO because of the loss of correction or pain due to accelerated osteoarthritis.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 43-year-old female patient presented with persistent pain of both the left knee and the ankle. She underwent a lateral closing wedge HTO two years ago. Radiographies showed The Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade IV osteoarthritic change and hyperextension (HE) of the left knee and the degeneration of the left ankle.

DIAGNOSES

A failed lateral closing wedge high tibial osteotomy with knee hyperextension and secondary ankle degeneration.

INTERVENTION

A posterior-stabilized TKA conversion and postoperative rehabilitation were performed.

OUTCOMES

The operation corrected the HE deformity and relieved the pain at the level of the left knee. However, the secondary change of the left ankle was irreversible.

LESSONS

A failed lateral closing wedge HTO might speed up the degeneration of the knee and increase extra technical issues in the following TKA. What is more, the secondary osteoarthritis and deformity of the ankle cannot be ignored.

Comparison of mid-term results between conversion total knee arthroplasties following closed wedge high tibial osteotomy and primary total knee arthroplasties: A matched pair study including patellar symptom and position

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare mid-term clinical and radiographic results of conversion total knee arthroplasties (TKA) following a closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and primary TKAs.

METHODS

A total of 32 conversion TKAs (29 patients) were compared with a matched control group of patients who had undergone primary TKA. The clinical results were evaluated using the Knee Society Knee and Function score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities score, patella score, and range of motion (ROM). The radiographic results were evaluated using femorotibial angle, mechanical axis (MA), the method employed by the American Knee Society, joint line height (JLH), the amount of tibial bone resection, and the Insall-Salvati ratio. The clinical and radiographic results of conversion TKAs were compared with primary TKAs. The thickness of the polyethylene insert was also compared.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in the clinical scores or ROM between two groups. No significant differences were detected in femorotibial angle, MA, and position of the components between two groups. The amount of tibial bone resection and pre-operative JLH both were significantly lower in the conversion group than those in the control group, although postoperative JLH and pre and postoperative Insall-Salvati ratio did not differ between two groups. No significant difference in the thickness of the polyethylene insert was identified between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The previous closed-wedge HTO itself had no detrimental effect on the mid-term outcome of the subsequent TKA, including patellar symptom and position. No significant differences in the postoperative joint line and patella height were detected between the conversion and primary TKA groups.

Comparison of the impact of closing wedge versus opening wedge high tibial osteotomy on proximal tibial deformity and subsequent revision to total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in proximal tibial deformity between closing wedge (CW) and opening wedge (OW) high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and their effects on the difficulty of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) conversion.

METHODS

Surgical simulations of CW-HTO and OW-HTO were performed on the same 3D computer-aided design knee models reconstructed from computed tomographic datasets of patients (median age 77 years; range 55-87 years; 40 knees) with medial osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis, and proximal tibial deformities were analysed. Subsequent TKA conversion was simulated in both CW and OW models, and the interference between the tibial implant and endosteal cortex was assessed.

RESULTS

The difference in the metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle in the CW-HTO and OW-HTO groups was 0.3° ± 0.2° (p < 0.001). The mechanical axis in the CW-HTO group was shifted laterally by 1.8 ± 1.1 mm relative to that in the OW-HTO group (p < 0.001) on the resection surface in TKA. Finally, the TKA tibial implant was substantially closer to the endosteal cortex in the CW-HTO group (mean 5.6 ± 1.6 mm) than to that in the OW-HTO group (mean 7.3 ± 1.6 mm) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The difference in the post-operative angular deformities of the proximal tibia between CW-HTO and OW-HTO was considered to be clinically irrelevant. The risk of interference between TKA tibial implant and endosteal bone was greater after CW-HTO than after OW-HTO. For clinical relevance, the difference between the two techniques has little influence on subsequent TKA difficulty regarding the proximal tibial deformity, although preoperative planning is obligatory, particularly after CW-HTO, to prevent interference with the tibial implant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis (UKOA): Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) or High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO)?

The aim of this review article is to analyze the results of high tibial osteotomy compared to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. The search engine used was PubMed. The keywords were: "high tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty". Twenty-one articles were found on 28 February 2015, but only eighteen were selected and reviewed because they strictly focused on the topic. In a meta-analysis the ratio for an excellent outcome was higher in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty than high tibial osteotomy and the risks of revision and complications were lower in the former. A prospective comparative study showed that unicompartmental knee arthroplasty offers better long-term success (77% for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and 60% for high tibial osteotomy at 7-10 years). However, a review of the literature showed no evidence of superior results of one treatment over the other. A multicenter study stated that unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis without constitutional deformity should be treated with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty while in cases with constitutional deformity high tibial osteotomy should be indicated. A case control study stated that unicompartmental knee arthroplasty offers a viable alternative to high tibial osteotomy if proper patient selection is done. The literature is still controversial regarding the best surgical treatment for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (high tibial osteotomy or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty). However, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty utilization is increasing, while high tibial osteotomy utilization is decreasing, and a meta-analysis has shown better outcomes and less risk of revision and complications in the former. A systematic review has found that with correct patient selection, both procedures show effective and reliable results. However, prospective randomized studies are needed in order to answer the question of this article.

Knee Arthroplasty After Subchondroplasty: Early Results, Complications, and Technical Challenges

BACKGROUND

Calcium phosphate bone substitutes (CPBS) are commonly used to augment and repair bone voids and defects after fractures around the knee joint. The purpose of this study was to determine whether prior arthroscopic application of a CPBS, for repair of magnetic resonance imaging-identified subchondral fractures associated with osteoarthritis (procedure referred to as subchondroplasty) adversely affected the performance and/or outcome of subsequent knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients who had arthroscopic repair of a periarticular fracture combined with use of a CPBS who later had knee arthroplasty were identified. Average follow-up for study patients was 23.5 months (range 12-52 months). These patients were matched demographically and for follow-up duration in a 2:1 ratio to a group of control subjects undergoing arthroplasty who had not undergone prior surgery.

RESULTS

Technical challenges related to surgical performance, clinical outcomes, and complications were determined for both the groups. At most recent follow-up, study patients had an average Oxford score of 40.6 (range, 25-48) compared with control subjects with an average score of 40.1 (range, 12-48). There was no difference in complications or surgical complexity between groups, and only standard primary components were used.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study suggest that prior arthroscopic repair combined with CPBS of periarticular fractures around the knee does not compromise the early outcomes and surgical performance or increase complications related to subsequent arthroplasty. However, longer follow-up of these patients is warranted to confirm that implant durability remains uncompromised.

High tibial osteotomy in varus knees: indications and limits

Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) is a surgical procedure that aims to correct the weight-bearing axis of the knee, moving the loads laterally from the medial compartment. Conventional indications for OWHTO are medial compartment osteoarthritis and varus malalignment of the knee; recently OWHTO has been used successfully in the treatment of double and triple varus. OWHTO, in contrast to closing wedge high tibial osteotomy, does not require fibular osteotomy or peroneal nerve dissection, or lead to disruption of the proximal tibiofibular joint and bone stock loss. For these reasons, interest in this procedure has grown in recent years. The aim of this study is to review the literature on OWHTO, considering indications and prognostic factors (body mass index, grade of osteoarthritis, instability, range of movement and age), outcomes at mid-term follow-up, and limits of the procedure (slope modifications, patellar height changes and difficulties in conversion to a total knee arthroplasty).

Total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review of open versus closed wedge osteotomy

PURPOSE

Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) has become increasingly popular as an alternative to lateral closing wedge osteotomy for the treatment of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis with varus deformity. The present systematic review was conducted to provide an objective analysis of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes following previous knee osteotomy (medial opening wedge vs. lateral closing wedge).

METHODS

A literature search of online databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library database) was made, in addition to manual search of major orthopaedic journals. The methodological quality of each of the studies was assessed on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Effective Practice and Organization of Care. A total of ten studies were included in the review. There were eight studies with Level IV and two studies with Level III evidence.

RESULTS

Eight studies reported clinical and radiologic scores. Comparative studies between TKA following medial opening and lateral closing wedge HTO did not demonstrate statistically significant clinical and radiologic differences. The revision rates were similar. However, more technical issues during TKA surgery after lateral closing wedge HTO were mentioned than the medial open wedge group. The quadriceps snip, tibial tubercle osteotomy, and lateral soft tissue release were more frequently needed in the lateral closing wedge HTO group. In addition, because of loss of proximal tibia bone geometry in the lateral closing wedge HTO group, concerns such as tibia stem impingement in the lateral tibial cortex was noted.

CONCLUSION

The present systematic review suggests that TKA after medial opening and lateral closing wedge HTO showed similar performance. Clinical and radiologic outcome including revision rates did not statistically differ from included studies. However, there are more surgical technical concerns in TKA conversion from lateral closing wedge HTO than from the medial opening wedge HTO group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty after Failed High Tibial Osteotomy

Clinical results of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) deteriorate over time despite the initial satisfactory results. Several knees may require a conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) because of failure such as the progression of degenerative osteoarthritis and the loss of the correction angle. It is important to know the long-term survival rate and common reason of failure in HTO to inform patients of postoperative expectations before surgery and to prevent surgical errors during surgery. In addition, it has been reported that clinical and radiological results, revision rate, and complication rate were poorer than those in patients without a previous HTO. There are few review articles that describe why conversion TKA after HTO is surgically difficult and the results are poor. Surgeons have to avoid the various complications and surgical errors in this specific situation. We would like to present the considering factors and technical difficulties during conversion TKA after HTO with a review of the literature. We could conclude through the review that the correction of deformity, lower amount of tibial bone resection, and sufficient polyethylene insert thickness, restoration of the joint line height, and adequate ligament balancing can be helpful in overcoming the technical challenges encountered during TKA following HTO.

Cruciate retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty after previous high tibial osteotomy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after previous high tibial osteotomy (HTO) using cruciate retaining (CR) versus posterior stabilized (PS) prostheses.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2010, 133 patients who underwent TKA after previous HTO were included in this study and prospectively followed up for two years. Two independent assessors recorded the range of motion of the operated knee, anterior-posterior (AP) laxity, medial-lateral (ML) laxity, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Function Score (KSFS) and Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS).

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients received CR prostheses, while 100 patients received PS prostheses. The median (inter-quartile range) knee flexion at 6 months and 2 years post-TKA was 101° (90, 116) and 110° (90, 118), respectively for the CR group, compared to 115° (100, 121) and 118° (108, 125) for the PS group (p = 0.010 and p = 0.009, respectively). AP and ML laxities were comparable in both groups of patients. While both groups of patients showed improvement in OKS, KSFS and KSKS at 6 months and 2 years post-TKA, there was no significant difference in these clinical scores between the two groups at both time points of follow-up. None of the 133 patients required revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Although PS prostheses offer better knee flexion in TKA after previous HTO, the knee stability, clinical scores and revision rate at 6 months and 2 years post-TKA are comparable between CR and PS prostheses. The authors conclude that CR is an alternative to PS prostheses in patients undergoing TKA after previous HTO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Computer-assisted total knee replacement after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: medium-term results in a series of ninety cases

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the medium-term results of total knee replacements (TKRs) after medial opening wedge valgising tibial osteotomy to those of primary TKR (TKR1). The hypothesis being that there would be no difference in results between these groups.

METHODS

Series 1 was made up of 45 TKRs after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MHTO)-30 men and ten women at an average age of 69 ± seven years (54-82). This was compared to a second series of TKR1s-30 men and ten women at an average age of 69 ± seven years (55-78). The average IKS scores were 91 ± 22.5 points (42-129) and 86 ± 18 points (38-116) in the two groups respectively. The average pre-operative HKA angle was 179 ± 5° (169-193°) in group 1, and 173 ± 7.5° (161-193°) in group 2. Tibial mechanical axes were 90.5 ± 4° (of which 24 knees had a valgus angle) and 85.05 ± 3.5° (79-93°) in the two groups respectively.

RESULTS

All patients were reviewed at an average follow-up of 47 ± 24.5 months for series 1 and 185 ± 8.5 months for series 2. The average IKS score was 184 ± 6 for series 1 (172-200) and 185 ± 8.5 (163-200) for series 2 (p = 0.872). Thirty-seven patients in series 1 and 38 patients in series 2 were either extremely satisfied or satisfied with the intervention. The average post-operative HKA angle was 180.5 ± 2.5° and 181 ± 2° (p = 0.122) and the average tibial mechanical axis was 89 ± 1.5° against 90 ± 1° (p = 0.001). The results of the 24 knees with a valgus tibial mechanical axis were statistically no different.

CONCLUSIONS

TKRs post medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy have identical results to primary TKRs even in knees with a valgus tibial mechanical axis.

Comparison between results of high tibial osteotomy above and below tibial tubercle in relation to future total knee arthroplasty

This prospective study included 50 patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis and varus knees. Twenty-five patients had high tibial closed wedge osteotomy above the tibial tubercle (TT) (group I), and the other 25 had the osteotomy just below it (group II). The two groups were matched. The osteotomies in both groups were fixed with plates and screws. All patients were followed up radiographically and clinically for more than 12 months. Clinical and radiographic results of both groups are comparable. Regarding factors that will affect future knee arthroplasty (TKA), osteotomies below TT are more advantageous. That is because soft tissues and bony changes of the knees in group II are minimal, and the issue of slower union rates can be diminished by using rigid plate fixation.

Effect of opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy on the three-dimensional kinematics of the knee

Although it is clear that opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) changes alignment in the coronal plane, which is its objective, it is not clear how this procedure affects knee kinematics throughout the range of joint movement and in other planes.

Our research question was: how does opening-wedge HTO change three-dimensional tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics in loaded flexion in patients with varus deformity?Three-dimensional kinematics were assessed over 0° to 60° of loaded flexion using an MRI method before and after opening-wedge HTO in a cohort of 13 men (14 knees). Results obtained from an iterative statistical model found that at six and 12 months after operation, opening-wedge HTO caused increased anterior translation of the tibia (mean 2.6 mm, p <  0.001), decreased proximal translation of the patella (mean –2.2 mm, p <  0.001), decreased patellar spin (mean –1.4°, p < 0.05), increased patellar tilt (mean 2.2°, p < 0.05) and changed three other parameters. The mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index improved significantly (p < 0.001) from 49.6 (standard deviation (sd) 16.4) pre-operatively to a mean of 28.2 (sd 16.6) at six months and a mean of 22.5 (sd 14.4) at 12 months.

The three-dimensional kinematic changes found may be important in explaining inconsistency in clinical outcomes, and suggest that measures in addition to coronal plane alignment should be considered.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:1214–21.

The effect of high tibial osteotomy on the posterior tibial slope

INTRODUCTION

High tibial osteotomy remains a useful procedure for delaying total knee arthroplasty for young patients with unicompartimental medial osteoarthritis of the knee. The tibial posterior slope is essential for both ligament function and knee kinematics. Even though many articles were published in the literature, the long term influence of open wedge high tibial osteotomy on the posterior slope of the tibial plateau remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the relationship among the degree of correction, the surgical technique, the postoperative modification of tibial slope, knee flexion and Knee score at the two years.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We used for evaluation a calibrated x-rays with correction factor. All the measures were done with Cedara I-View 6.3.2 application. All 47 patients were operated in our hospital between 2008-2011, with the same technique, open wedge high tibial osteotomy with an acrylic cement wedge. All patients postponed weight bearing for 6 weeks.

RESULTS

We found that there is no statistical significance (p=0.2) between the preoperative varus and the after surgery tibial slope, but the resulting posterior inclination after surgery influences the tibial posterior slope at 2 years (p<=0.005).The degree of correction has a strong influence over the increase or decrease of tibial posterior slope(p<0.005). An increase in tibial slope increases the knee flexion by 1.45° for every degree of inclination (p<0.05). Functional results are not influenced by small modifications in tibial inclination (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

From this findings we may conclude that the most important factors that changes the posterior inclination of the tibia surface are the height of the cement wedge and the surgical technique, by placing the acrylic cement wedge more anteriorly. We have found that the vast majority of our high tibial osteotomies are in fact "flexion" osteotomies. At the 2 years control we have found a slight increase in tibial slope angle (average 1.77°) and knee flexion (average 2.56°) with no functional response. This is a case series study with level of evidence IV.

Uncertainties surrounding the choice of surgical treatment for 'bone on bone' medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee

A number of different surgical interventions can be used for treating antero-medial osteoarthritis (AMOA) of the knee and this choice can present challenges for patient's decision-making. Patients with AMOA can undergo Total Knee Replacement (TKR), Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) or High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) for the same pathology. However many uncertainties still exist as to deciding which operation is best for individual patients and the Orthopaedic community has failed to systematically compare treatment options. The relative lack of scientifically based evidence has impacted on the ability to provide clear guidelines on treatment choice, patient suitability and direct patient preference for treatment. This paper, using available evidence, discusses the issue and offers some suggestions for future development.