1
|
Levy HA, Szeto S, O Starks A, Davis DE. Outcomes after salvage reverse shoulder arthroplasty for failed primary fixation or hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: A systematic review. Shoulder Elbow 2023; 15:6-18. [PMID: 37974637 PMCID: PMC10649504 DOI: 10.1177/17585732221099200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Background Salvage reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for failed proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) fixation and hemiarthroplasty (HA) may maximize outcomes in the absence of tuberosity healing or a chronically torn rotator cuff. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the improvement in clinical outcomes for patients after revision RSA was performed for failed PHFs fixation or HA. Methods An electronic database search of SCOPUS, PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed. A meta-analysis was carried out to determine weighted mean outcome differences between two primary intervention cohorts (failed fixation: open reduction and internal fixation, intramedullary nail, or K-wire vs. failed HA). Results Fifteen studies were included (primary fixation: 208 patients; HA: 162 patients). Patients improved meaningfully in all clinical outcomes after revision surgery (constant: 18.5-48.3; abduction: 44-95; forward flexion: 47-107; external rotation: 5-10), with a 16.2% complication and 9.4% revision rate. The failed fixation group performed significantly better than the failed HA group in postoperative constant (fixation: 53.3 vs. HA: 45.1, p = 0.016) and shoulder abduction (fixation: 102 vs. HA: 87, p = 0.026). Conclusions RSA is a successful revision intervention for primary PHF operative failures with the greatest benefit for failures of primary fixation versus HA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah A Levy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stanley Szeto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexandria O Starks
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel E Davis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reddy AK, Checketts JX, Stephens BJ, Anderson JM, Cooper CM, Hunt T, Fishbeck K, Boose M, Detweiler B, Chalkin B, Norris BL. Complication and revision rates after reverse total shoulder revision from hemiarthroplasty: a systematic review. Shoulder Elbow 2022; 14:481-490. [PMID: 36199509 PMCID: PMC9527483 DOI: 10.1177/17585732211019390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Background Thus, the purpose of the present study was to (1) characterize common postoperative complications and (2) quantify the rates of revision in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty revisional surgery. We hypothesize that hardware loosenings will be the most common complication to occur in the sample, with the humeral component being the most common loosening. Methods This systematic review adhered to PRISMA reporting guideline. For our inclusion criteria, we included any study that contained intraoperative and/or postoperative complication data, and revision rates on patients who had undergone revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty due to a failed hemiarthroplasty. Complications include neurologic injury, deep surgical site infections, hardware loosening/prosthetic instability, and postoperative fractures (acromion, glenoid, and humeral fractures). Results The study contained 22 studies that assessed complications from shoulders that had revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty from a hemiarthroplasty, with a total sample of 925 shoulders. We found that the most common complication to occur was hardware loosenings (5.3%), and of the hardware loosenings, humeral loosenings (3.8%) were the most common. The revision rate was found to be 10.7%. Conclusion This systematic review found that revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed hemiarthroplasty has a high overall complication and reintervention rates, specifically for hardware loosening and revision rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjun K Reddy
- Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Jake X Checketts
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | | | - J Michael Anderson
- Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Craig M Cooper
- Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Tyler Hunt
- Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Erie, PA, USA
| | - Keith Fishbeck
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Marshall Boose
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Byron Detweiler
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Brian Chalkin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Brent L Norris
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Tulsa, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dolci A, Melis B, Verona M, Capone A, Marongiu G. Complications and Intraoperative Fractures in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2021; 12:21514593211059865. [PMID: 34900387 PMCID: PMC8664304 DOI: 10.1177/21514593211059865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The reverse shoulder arthroplasty is nowadays a treatment option for a variety of shoulder problems. As its incidence rose, also the number of complications increased, including intraoperative fractures. Significance We performed a systematic review and critical analysis of the current literature following the PRISMA guidelines. Our purpose was to: 1) determine incidence, causes, and characteristics of intraoperative fractures; 2) evaluate their current treatment options, possible related complications, reoperation rates, and the patients’ outcome; and 3) determine the overall incidence of each complication related to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The articles were selected from PubMed medical database in April 2020 using a comprehensive search strategy. Rayyan software was used to support the selection process of the records. A descriptive and critical analysis of the results was performed. Results The study group included a total of 13,513 reverse shoulder arthroplasty procedures. The total number of complications was 1647 (rate 12.1%). The most common complication was dislocation (340 cases, rate 2.5%). Forty-six studies reported a total of 188 intraoperative fractures among the complications (rate 1.4%). The intraoperative fracture rate was 2.9% and 13.6% in primary and revision settings, respectively. There were 136 humeral fractures, 60% of them occurred in revision RSAs, during the removal of the previous implant, and involved the shaft in the majority of cases (39%). Glenoid fractures were 51 and occurred mostly during the reaming of the glenoid. We observed 7 further related complications (rate of 4%) and 3 reoperations (rate of 1.5%). The outcome was satisfactory in the majority of cases. Conclusions A comprehensive review on intraoperative fractures in reverse shoulder arthroplasties is presented. Results suggest favorable outcomes for all treatment methods, with a modest further complication rate. This investigation may aid in the treatment decision-making for these complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Dolci
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Orthopaedic and Trauma Clinic, Policlinico Universitario D. Casula, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Barbara Melis
- Orthopaedic and Sport Trauma Unit, Casa di Cura Policlinico Città di Quartu, Quartu Sant'Elena, Italy
| | - Marco Verona
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Orthopaedic and Trauma Clinic, Policlinico Universitario D. Casula, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Antonio Capone
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Orthopaedic and Trauma Clinic, Policlinico Universitario D. Casula, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Marongiu
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Orthopaedic and Trauma Clinic, Policlinico Universitario D. Casula, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ravi V, Murphy RJ, Moverley R, Derias M, Phadnis J. Outcome and complications following revision shoulder arthroplasty : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Jt Open 2021; 2:618-630. [PMID: 34382837 PMCID: PMC8384442 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.28.bjo-2021-0092.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS It is important to understand the rate of complications associated with the increasing burden of revision shoulder arthroplasty. Currently, this has not been well quantified. This review aims to address that deficiency with a focus on complication and reoperation rates, shoulder outcome scores, and comparison of anatomical and reverse prostheses when used in revision surgery. METHODS A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) systematic review was performed to identify clinical data for patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty. Data were extracted from the literature and pooled for analysis. Complication and reoperation rates were analyzed using a meta-analysis of proportion, and continuous variables underwent comparative subgroup analysis. RESULTS A total of 112 studies (5,379 shoulders) were eligible for inclusion, although complete clinical data was not ubiquitous. Indications for revision included component loosening 20% (601/3,041), instability 19% (577/3,041), rotator cuff failure 17% (528/3,041), and infection 16% (490/3,041). Intraoperative complication and postoperative complication and reoperation rates were 8% (230/2,915), 22% (825/3,843), and 13% (584/3,843) respectively. Intraoperative and postoperative complications included iatrogenic humeral fractures (91/230, 40%) and instability (215/825, 26%). Revision to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), rather than revision to anatomical TSA from any index prosthesis, resulted in lower complication rates and superior Constant scores, although there was no difference in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. CONCLUSION Satisfactory improvement in patient-reported outcome measures are reported following revision shoulder arthroplasty; however, revision surgery is associated with high complication rates and better outcomes may be evident following revision to reverse TSA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):618-630.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinayak Ravi
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Richard James Murphy
- University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK
| | - Robert Moverley
- University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole Hospital, Poole, UK
| | - Mina Derias
- University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK
| | - Joideep Phadnis
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
- University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Prosthetic Bearing Surfaces in Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2021; 29:414-422. [PMID: 33443383 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-20-00166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse TSA have provided an effective treatment for glenohumeral osteoarthritis; however, longevity of the procedure may be limited by osteolysis and polyethylene wear. In TSA, glenoid component failure occurs through several mechanisms, the most common being aseptic loosening and polyethylene wear. Newer bearing surfaces such as highly cross-linked ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene, vitamin E processing, ceramic heads, and pyrolytic carbon surfaces have shown improved wear characteristics in biomechanical and some early clinical studies. The purpose of this review is to provide a historical perspective and current state of the art of bearing surface technology in anatomic and reverse TSA.
Collapse
|
6
|
Banci L, Meoli A, Hintner M, Bloch HR. Wear performance of inverted non-conforming bearings in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder Elbow 2020; 12:40-52. [PMID: 33343715 PMCID: PMC7726178 DOI: 10.1177/1758573219826531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glenoid component failures still represent the most common complication in total shoulder arthroplasty. These failures depend on several factors, including ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear. One reason for UHMWPE wear in total shoulder arthroplasty may be the current use of a spherical prosthetic humeral head against a radially mismatched UHMWPE glenoid component, which leads to reduced glenohumeral translations, glenoid edge loading and high translational forces during shoulder motions. The aim of this study was to assess the in vitro wear of an anatomic total shoulder prosthesis with non-spherical non-conforming bearings with inverted conventional materials. METHODS The wear of a vitamin E-blended UHMWPE non-spherical humeral head articulating against a non-conforming titanium-niobium nitride (TiNbN)-coated metallic glenoid was tested using a joint simulator. The wear test was performed by applying a constant load of 756 N with angular motions and translations. RESULTS After 2.5 million cycles, the mean wear rate of the humeral head was 0.28 ± standard deviation (SD) 0.45 mg/million cycles. CONCLUSION The low wear rate of the vitamin E UHMWPE humeral head supports the use of non-spherical non-conforming bearings with inverted conventional materials in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Banci
- Permedica S.p.A., Merate, Italy,Lorenzo Banci, Permedica S.p.A. Via Como 38, 23807 Merate (LC), Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Boileau P, Seeto BL, Clowez G, Gauci MO, Trojani C, Walch G, Chelli M. SECEC Grammont Award 2017: the prejudicial effect of greater tuberosity osteotomy or excision in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture sequelae. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:2446-2458. [PMID: 33190752 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS The aim was to evaluate risk factors for complications, revision, and mid- to long-term outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) implanted for proximal humeral fracture sequelae (PHFS). METHODS The radiographs of 98 patients (mean age, 68 years) who underwent RSA for the treatment of PHFS were reviewed at a minimum 5-year follow-up. PHFS were divided into 4 types according to the Boileau classification: type 1 (46 cases), type 2 (6 cases), type 3 (12 cases), and type 4 (34 cases). The tuberosities underwent osteotomy in 28 cases and excision in 12 (all type 3 or 4 PHFS). The mean follow-up period was 8.4 years (range, 5-14 years). RESULTS The functional results and rate of RSA survival without revision (85% vs. 100% at 10 years, P = .007) were significantly lower for types 3 and 4 vs. types 1 and 2. Overall, our findings showed that RSA for PHFS is not the panacea that surgeons once believed: At a mean follow-up of 8.5 years (range, 5-14 years), 59% of the patients in our series had fair or poor results. Patients who underwent tuberosity osteotomy or excision had lower functional results (adjusted Constant score, 69% vs. 88%; P < .001), more postoperative complications (32% vs. 9%, P = .003), and a higher revision rate (15% vs. 2%, P = .017). Patients who underwent tuberosity osteotomy or excision at the time of RSA were at risk of postoperative prosthetic instability and humeral stem loosening. The absence of the greater tuberosity at last radiographic follow-up was predictive of higher rates of complications and revisions, as well as a poorer final outcome. Previous fracture fixation was associated with a higher rate of complete tuberosity resorption (56% vs. 33%, P = .026) and with higher rates of postoperative complications (27% vs. 13%, P = .099) and reinterventions (17% vs. 2%, P = .018). CONCLUSION The functional results and rates of complications and revision depend on the type of fracture sequelae and tuberosity management. Patients with more severe (type 3 and 4) fracture sequelae who undergo tuberosity osteotomy or excision are at risk of having a poorer functional result and higher rates of complications and revision with lower survival. Previous fracture fixation is also a prejudicial factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Boileau
- iULS-University Institute for Locomotion & Sport, Pasteur 2 Hospital, Nice, France.
| | - Brian L Seeto
- iULS-University Institute for Locomotion & Sport, Pasteur 2 Hospital, Nice, France
| | - Gilles Clowez
- iULS-University Institute for Locomotion & Sport, Pasteur 2 Hospital, Nice, France
| | - Marc-Olivier Gauci
- iULS-University Institute for Locomotion & Sport, Pasteur 2 Hospital, Nice, France
| | - Christophe Trojani
- iULS-University Institute for Locomotion & Sport, Pasteur 2 Hospital, Nice, France
| | | | - Mikaël Chelli
- iULS-University Institute for Locomotion & Sport, Pasteur 2 Hospital, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nelson PA, Kwan CC, Tjong VK, Terry MA, Sheth U. Primary Versus Salvage Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast 2020; 4:2471549220949731. [PMID: 34497963 PMCID: PMC8282171 DOI: 10.1177/2471549220949731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is currently no established consensus on best treatment for complex proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) in the elderly. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a viable option in this population but many times is used as a salvage procedure. METHODS A systematic review of studies comparing RTSA as a primary treatment for PHF versus as a salvage procedure following failed open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), humeral intramedullary nailing, hemiarthroplasty (HA) or non-operative treatment was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Pooled outcomes and sub-group analyses assessing range of motion, patient reported outcomes and complications were examined using RevMan. RESULTS Five articles were included in final analysis with 104 patients in the primary RTSA group and 147 in the salvage RTSA group compromising 251 total patients. Primary RTSA had a statistically significant advantage in range of motion (forward flexion and external rotation), patient reported outcomes, and complications compared to salvage RTSA. CONCLUSIONS Based on the best available evidence, primary RTSA may result in slightly better patient reported outcomes, range of motion and a lower rate of complication when compared to salvage RTSA. Further high-quality prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings of the current review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick A Nelson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University,
Chicago, Illinois
| | - Changyow C Kwan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University,
Chicago, Illinois
| | - Vehniah K Tjong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University,
Chicago, Illinois
| | - Michael A Terry
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University,
Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ujash Sheth
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University,
Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shah SS, Roche AM, Sullivan SW, Gaal BT, Dalton S, Sharma A, King JJ, Grawe BM, Namdari S, Lawler M, Helmkamp J, Garrigues GE, Wright TW, Schoch BS, Flik K, Otto RJ, Jones R, Jawa A, McCann P, Abboud J, Horneff G, Ross G, Friedman R, Ricchetti ET, Boardman D, Tashjian RZ, Gulotta LV. The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II. JSES Int 2020; 5:121-137. [PMID: 33554177 PMCID: PMC7846704 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Globally, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has moved away from the Grammont design to modern prosthesis designs. The purpose of this study was to provide a focused, updated systematic review for each of the most common complications of RSA by limiting each search to publications after 2010. In this part II, the following were examined: (1) instability, (2) humerus/glenoid fracture, (3) acromial/scapular spine fractures (AF/SSF), and (4) problems/miscellaneous. Methods Four separate PubMed database searches were performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Overall, 137 studies for instability, 94 for humerus/glenoid fracture, 120 for AF/SSF, and 74 for problems/miscellaneous were included in each review, respectively. Univariate analysis was performed with chi-square and Fisher exact tests. Results The Grammont design had a higher instability rate vs. all other designs combined (4.0%, 1.3%; P < .001), and the onlay humerus design had a lower rate than the lateralized glenoid design (0.9%, 2.0%; P = .02). The rate for intraoperative humerus fracture was 1.8%; intraoperative glenoid fracture, 0.3%; postoperative humerus fracture, 1.2%; and postoperative glenoid fracture, 0.1%. The rate of AF/SSF was 2.6% (371/14235). The rate for complex regional pain syndrome was 0.4%; deltoid injury, 0.1%; hematoma, 0.3%; and heterotopic ossification, 0.8%. Conclusions Focused systematic reviews of recent literature with a large volume of shoulders demonstrate that using non-Grammont modern prosthesis designs, complications including instability, intraoperative humerus and glenoid fractures, and hematoma are significantly reduced compared with previous studies. As the indications continue to expand for RSA, it is imperative to accurately track the rate and types of complications in order to justify its cost and increased indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarav S. Shah
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
- Corresponding author: Sarav S. Shah, MD, 125 Parker Hill Ave, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
| | | | | | - Benjamin T. Gaal
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Stewart Dalton
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Arjun Sharma
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Joseph J. King
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Brian M. Grawe
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Surena Namdari
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Macy Lawler
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Joshua Helmkamp
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | | | - Thomas W. Wright
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | | | - Kyle Flik
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Randall J. Otto
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Richard Jones
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Andrew Jawa
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Peter McCann
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Joseph Abboud
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Gabe Horneff
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Glen Ross
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Richard Friedman
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | | | - Douglas Boardman
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shah SS, Gaal BT, Roche AM, Namdari S, Grawe BM, Lawler M, Dalton S, King JJ, Helmkamp J, Garrigues GE, Wright TW, Schoch BS, Flik K, Otto RJ, Jones R, Jawa A, McCann P, Abboud J, Horneff G, Ross G, Friedman R, Ricchetti ET, Boardman D, Tashjian RZ, Gulotta LV. The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part I. JSES Int 2020; 4:929-943. [PMID: 33345237 PMCID: PMC7738599 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Globally, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has moved away from the Grammont design to modern prosthesis designs. The purpose of this 2-part study was to systematically review each of the most common complications of RSA, limiting each search to publications in 2010 or later. In this part (part I), we examined (1) scapular notching (SN), (2) periprosthetic infection (PJI), (3) mechanical failure (glenoid or humeral component), and (4) neurologic injury (NI). Methods Four separate PubMed database searches were performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Overall, 113 studies on SN, 62 on PJI, 34 on mechanical failure, and 48 on NI were included in our reviews. Univariate analysis was performed with the χ2 or Fisher exact test. Results The Grammont design had a higher SN rate vs. all other designs combined (42.5% vs. 12.3%, P < .001). The onlay humeral design had a lower rate than the lateralized glenoid design (10.5% vs. 14.8%, P < .001). The PJI rate was 2.4% for primary RSA and 2.6% for revision RSA. The incidence of glenoid and humeral component loosening was 2.3% and 1.4%, respectively. The Grammont design had an increased NI rate vs. all other designs combined (0.9% vs. 0.1%, P = .04). Conclusions Focused systematic reviews of the recent literature with a large volume of RSAs demonstrate that with the use of non-Grammont modern prosthesis designs, complications including SN, PJI, glenoid component loosening, and NI are significantly reduced compared with previous studies. As the indications for RSA continue to expand, it is imperative to accurately track the rates and types of complications to justify its cost and increased indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarav S Shah
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Benjamin T Gaal
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Alexander M Roche
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Surena Namdari
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Brian M Grawe
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Macy Lawler
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Stewart Dalton
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Joseph J King
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Joshua Helmkamp
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Grant E Garrigues
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Thomas W Wright
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Bradley S Schoch
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Kyle Flik
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Randall J Otto
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Richard Jones
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Andrew Jawa
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Peter McCann
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Joseph Abboud
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Gabe Horneff
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Glen Ross
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Richard Friedman
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Douglas Boardman
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Robert Z Tashjian
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Lawrence V Gulotta
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Franke KJ, Christmas KN, Downes KL, Mighell MA, Frankle MA. Does the etiology of a failed hemiarthroplasty affect outcomes when revised to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:S149-S156. [PMID: 31706802 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Revised: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purposes of this study were to evaluate patient outcomes after revision of hemiarthroplasty to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) based on initial pathology, to determine the re-revision rate, and to identify characteristics that may predict subsequent re-revision. METHODS A total of 207 shoulder hemiarthroplasty, bipolar prosthesis, and humeral resurfacing cases revised to RSA between January 2004 and January 2017 were reviewed. Outcome measures included shoulder motion and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores. Sixteen RSAs underwent re-revision. A case-control study with each revised RSA matched to 4 controls based on age, sex, and minimum 2-year follow-up was performed to evaluate for factors predicting re-revision. RESULTS The mean time from initial hemiarthroplasty to RSA was 3.6 years (range, 0.1-20 years). There were 114 patients with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up (mean, 57 months; range, 24-144 months). The most common initial diagnoses for hemiarthroplasty were fracture (n = 72), cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) (n = 22), and osteoarthritis (OA) (n = 20). Overall mean scores and range-of-motion values were as follows: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 54-64); SST score, 4 (95% CI, 4-5); forward flexion, 106° (95% CI, 96°-116°); and abduction, 95° (95% CI, 85°-105°). Compared with fracture cases, CTA cases had better forward flexion (P = .01) and abduction (P = .006) and OA cases had better SST scores (P = .02) and abduction (P = .04). The re-revision rate was 7.7% at a mean of 31 months (range, 0-116 months), with the most common diagnosis being fracture (10 of 16 cases). Humeral loosening (8 of 16 cases) was the most common failure mechanism, and larger glenosphere sizes were more likely to be revised. CONCLUSION Functional outcome scores of hemiarthroplasty cases revised to RSA were better for patients with OA than for patients with CTA or fracture. Cases of hemiarthroplasty for fracture had decreased motion after revision to RSA compared with CTA and OA. Humeral loosening was the most common failure mechanism.
Collapse
|
12
|
Clinical outcomes and complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty used for failed prior shoulder surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JSES Int 2020; 4:156-168. [PMID: 32195479 PMCID: PMC7075779 DOI: 10.1016/j.jses.2019.10.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is frequently performed in the revision setting as a salvage procedure. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical outcomes and complication, reoperation, and revision rates after revision RSA (RRSA) stratified according to the primary shoulder procedure undergoing revision. Methods Four databases (Embase, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register) were searched for eligible studies published between January 1985 and September 2017. The primary outcomes of interest included pain, active range of motion, and functional outcome scores. Secondary outcomes included complication, reoperation, and revision rates. Results A total of 43 studies (1041 shoulder arthroplasties) met the inclusion criteria, with a mean follow-up period of 43.8 months (range, 31.1-57.2 months). Pain scores improved in all groups; however, none reached statistical significance. Range of motion improved in all groups, except for external rotation in the RSA category. RRSA demonstrated significant improvements in the Simple Shoulder Test score and Constant score (CS) in the group undergoing hemiarthroplasty (HA) for fracture, CS in the group undergoing HA for other indications, and CS in the group undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Pooled complication rates were highest in the failed RSA group (56.2%), followed by the group undergoing HA for other indications (27.7%), total shoulder arthroplasty group (23.6%), soft-tissue repair group (20.6%), open reduction and internal fixation group (19.0%), and group undergoing HA for fracture (13.6%). Conclusions Compared with other revision indications, RRSA for failed HA demonstrated the most favorable outcomes, whereas the highest complication and revision rates were observed in the RSA subgroup. This information is useful when establishing patient expectations regarding the risks, benefits, and complication and revision rates of RRSA.
Collapse
|
13
|
Santana F, Alentorn-Geli E, Guirro P, Torrens C. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture sequelae: How the initial fracture treatment influences the outcomes of joint replacement. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA 2019; 53:278-281. [PMID: 30982758 PMCID: PMC6737506 DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2018] [Revised: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 03/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in proximal humeral fracture sequelae (PHFS) in fractures initially treated conservatively versus those initially treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Methods It is a retrospective study that includes all PHFS treated with a RSA from September 2006 to December 2013. Twenty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 9 patients (7 females and 2 males; mean age: 79.11 years) treated with RSA due to a fracture sequelae following conservative treatment and 18 patients (15 females and 3 males; mean age: 76.83 years) treated with a RSA owing to a fracture sequelae after ORIF. The functional outcome was recorded with the aid of the pre-surgery Constant Score and at the latest follow-up (minimum of two years). All the patients included underwent an imaging study that included plain X-Rays and a CT scan prior to surgery and plain X-Rays after surgery. All complications and reoperations during follow-up were also recorded. Results Both groups had significantly increased Constant Scores after surgery (p < 0.0001), but the patients in the conservative group had significantly better outcomes for the total Constant Score (p = 0.024), for forward elevation (p = 0.026) and for external rotation (p = 0.004). A total of 4 complications (14.8%) were present during the follow-up period. In the conservative group, 1 patient developed an infection and there were 2 dislocations and 1 infection in the ORIF group. Conclusion The use of RSA in the treatment of PHFS results in a limited outcome improvement but with an acceptable complication rate. Patients developing PHFS after conservative treatment may expect better outcomes and fewer complications than those developing PHFS after ORIF. Level of evidence Level IV, Therapeutic Study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Santana
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Marítim 25, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduard Alentorn-Geli
- Fundación García-Cugat, Hospital QuironSalud Barcelona, Plaza Alfonso Comín 5-7, Planta -1, Barcelona, Spain; Artroscopia GC, SL, Hospital QuironSalud Barcelona, Plaza Alfonso Comín 5-7, Planta -1, Barcelona, Spain; Mutualidad Catalana de Futbolistas, Federación Española de Fútbol, Ronda Sant Pere 19-21, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Pau Guirro
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Calle Sant Joan de Déu 7, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Carlos Torrens
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Marítim 25, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Merolla G, Wagner E, Sperling JW, Paladini P, Fabbri E, Porcellini G. Revision of failed shoulder hemiarthroplasty to reverse total arthroplasty: analysis of 157 revision implants. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27:75-81. [PMID: 28751094 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.06.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2017] [Revised: 06/17/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There remains a paucity of studies examining the conversion of failed hemiarthroplasty (HA) to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine a large series of revision HA to RTSA. METHODS A population of 157 patients who underwent conversion of a failed HA to a revision RTSA from 2006 through 2014 were included. The mean follow-up was 49 months (range, 24-121 months). The indications for revision surgery included instability with rotator cuff insufficiency (n = 127) and glenoid wear (n = 30); instability and glenoid wear were associated in 38 cases. Eight patients with infection underwent 2-stage reimplantation. RESULTS Patients experienced significant improvements in their preoperative to postoperative pain and shoulder range of motion (P < .0001), with median American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Simple Shoulder Test scores of 60 and 6 points, respectively. There were 11 (7%) repeated revision surgeries, secondary to glenoid component loosening (n = 3), instability (n = 3), humeral component disassembly (n = 2), humeral stem loosening (n = 1), and infection (n = 2). Implant survivorship was 95.5% at 2 years and 93.3% at 5 years. There were 4 reoperations including axillary nerve neurolysis (n = 2), heterotopic ossification removal (n = 1), and hardware removal for rupture of the metal cerclage for an acromial fracture (n = 1). At final follow-up, there were 5 "at-risk" glenoid components. CONCLUSION Patients experience satisfactory pain relief and recovery of reasonable shoulder function after revision RTSA from a failed HA. There was a relatively low revision rate, with glenoid loosening and instability being the most common causes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Merolla
- Shoulder and Elbow Unit, "D. Cervesi" Hospital, Cattolica-AUSL della Romagna, Ambito Territoriale di Rimini, Italy; "Marco Simoncelli" Biomechanics Laboratory, "D. Cervesi" Hospital, Cattolica-AUSL della Romagna, Ambito Territoriale di Rimini, Italy.
| | - Eric Wagner
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - John W Sperling
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Paolo Paladini
- Shoulder and Elbow Unit, "D. Cervesi" Hospital, Cattolica-AUSL della Romagna, Ambito Territoriale di Rimini, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Fabbri
- Research and Innovation Department, AUSL della Romagna, Ambito Territoriale di Rimini, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Porcellini
- Shoulder and Elbow Unit, "D. Cervesi" Hospital, Cattolica-AUSL della Romagna, Ambito Territoriale di Rimini, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Olszewski N, Gustin M, Curry EJ, Li X. Management of Complex Anterior Shoulder Instability: a Case-Based Approach. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2017; 10:480-490. [PMID: 28988351 PMCID: PMC5685960 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-017-9438-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW The goal of this review is to provide a guide on surgical decision-making options for complex anterior shoulder instability using a case-based approach. RECENT FINDINGS Arthroscopic Bankart repair is well documented for having successful outcomes in patients with isolated labral tear involvement with minimal bone loss. Latarjet is a generally accepted procedure in patients with 20-30% glenoid bone loss. When bone loss exceeds that which cannot be managed through Latarjet, a range of options exist and are highly dependent upon the extent of osseous deficiency on both the glenoid and humeral sides, surgeon experience, and patient-specific factors. The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the management of chronic locked shoulder dislocations has been described as a successful management option. Treatment options for complex anterior shoulder instability range widely based on patients' presenting exam, surgical history, amount of glenoid bone loss, size of Hill-Sachs lesion, and surgeon preference. When selecting the appropriate surgical intervention, the treating surgeon must consider the patient history, physical exam, and preoperative imaging along with patient expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Olszewski
- Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Michael Gustin
- Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Emily J Curry
- Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Xinning Li
- Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
| |
Collapse
|