In vivo kinematics of gait in posterior-stabilized and bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasties using image-matching techniques

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Biomechanical Variables That May Be Related to Knee Functions Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a commonly performed surgery aimed at alleviating pain and improving functionality. However, patients often face uncertainties in selecting the timing, location, and type of TKA implant that best meets their needs. This study aims to comprehensively compare various variables, explore trends, and identify factors potentially influencing TKA outcomes. A cohort of 40 TKA subjects received either unilateral posterior stabilized (Persona) TKA or bi-cruciate stabilized (Journey II) TKA. Additionally, 20 healthy controls matched for age, gender, and BMI were included. Participants underwent patient-reported outcome assessments, range of motion evaluations, balance assessments, proprioception tests, and biomechanical analyses. These analyses covered motion, loading, and electromyography during five daily activities and two clinical tests. Multifactor ANOVA was utilized to compare 283 variables and assess their impact on TKA outcomes. A knee biomechanics index was formulated to evaluate deviations from healthy norms. Significant differences were observed in EMG varus/valgus rotation during both ramp-up and ramp-down phases between the two implant groups. Although significant improvements were noted post-TKA for both implants, the results remained below those of the control group. Gender, age, and BMI exhibited noticeable effects on TKA outcomes across several biomechanical variables and demonstrated significant disparities compared to the controls.

Component rotational mismatch in the standing position is a potential risk factor for unfavourable functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

This study assessed rotational mismatch between components after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the supine and standing positions and aimed to investigate the effect of rotational mismatch in the standing position on postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Methods

Seventy-one patients (71 knees) who underwent TKA for medial knee osteoarthritis were used to investigate rotational mismatches between components. Rotational mismatches between components were examined on postoperative standing whole-leg and supine knee radiographs using a three-dimensional-to-two-dimensional model image registration technique, and the angles between the reference axes of the components were measured. Component alignment was evaluated using postoperative computed tomography images, and a questionnaire (2011 version of the Knee Society Score: [KSS 2011]) was mailed to investigate postoperative PROMs.

Results

In the entire cohort, rotational mismatches in the supine and standing positions were similar (p = 0.9315). In 15% of patients, the mismatch was large (>5°) in the supine position but small (<5°) in the standing position (overestimated group). However, in 23% of patients, the mismatch was small (<5°) in the supine position and large (>5°) in the standing position (underestimated group). The underestimated group had severe preoperative varus deformity, resulting in external rotation of both femoral and tibial components. Rotational mismatch in the standing position (p = 0.0032) was a significant risk factor for unfavourable PROMs. Patients with a mismatch in the standing position had significantly lower scores than those without a mismatch (p = 0.0215), exceeding the minimal clinically important difference values.

Conclusions

The underestimated group is clinically important because the surgical procedure and intraoperative assessment of component placement are performed in the supine position. In cases of severe preoperative varus deformity, care should be taken not to place the component in malrotation to avoid rotational mismatch in the standing position.

Level of Evidence

Ⅳ, Case series.

Progression of varus deformity in osteoarthritic knees induces anterior paradoxical motion of the femur during early knee flexion

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the position of the femur relative to the tibia throughout range of motion in the osteoarthritic knee to evaluate knee kinematics and assess its relationship with the degree of varus deformity.

METHODS

In this study, 116 preoperative knees with varus deformity were evaluated using a navigation system. The internal-external, anteroposterior, and mediolateral positions of the femur relative to the tibia were measured at maximum extension, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°, 105°, and 120°, and maximum flexion angles. From these parameters, two-dimensional translation of the surgical epicondylar axis was projected onto the tibial axial plane, and the femoral movement was evaluated relative to the tibia. In addition, the knees were retrospectively classified into three groups according to their degrees of preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle: mild (< 10°), moderate (10°-20°), and severe (> 20°). Then, the differences in each parameter between these groups were investigated. The Steel-Dwass test was performed to identify the difference among three groups. Statistical significance was set at p values < 0.05.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the anteroposterior position of the femur relative to the tibia among the three groups, especially from extension to early flexion (p < 0.05). The anteroposterior position at knee extension deviated posteriorly according to the progression of varus deformity. Rotational and mediolateral translation were not significantly different among the groups. Normal knee kinematics were diminished in almost all cases in each group. In addition, anterior paradoxical motion of the femur during early knee flexion was observed in 45.6% (n = 26), 57.1% (n = 28), and 80.0% (n = 8) of cases in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. The anteroposterior position of the femur relative to the tibia at knee extension was significantly more posterior in patients with than in those without anterior paradoxical motion (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The anteroposterior position of the femur relative to the tibia changed according to the progression of varus deformity in osteoarthritic knees, especially from knee extension to early flexion. Posterior deviation of the femur at knee extension induced its anteroposterior movement relative to the tibia, resulting in anterior paradoxical motion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

A frame orientation optimisation method for consistent interpretation of kinematic signals

In clinical movement biomechanics, kinematic data are often depicted as waveforms (i.e. signals), characterising the motion of articulating joints. Clinically meaningful interpretations of the underlying joint kinematics, however, require an objective understanding of whether two different kinematic signals actually represent two different underlying physical movement patterns of the joint or not. Previously, the accuracy of IMU-based knee joint angles was assessed using a six-degrees-of-freedom joint simulator guided by fluoroscopy-based signals. Despite implementation of sensor-to-segment corrections, observed errors were clearly indicative of cross-talk, and thus inconsistent reference frame orientations. Here, we address these limitations by exploring how minimisation of dedicated cost functions can harmonise differences in frame orientations, ultimately facilitating consistent interpretation of articulating joint kinematic signals. In this study, we present and investigate a frame orientation optimisation method (FOOM) that aligns reference frames and corrects for cross-talk errors, hence yielding a consistent interpretation of the underlying movement patterns. By executing optimised rotational sequences, thus producing angular corrections around each axis, we enable a reproducible frame definition and hence an approach for reliable comparison of kinematic data. Using this approach, root-mean-square errors between the previously collected (1) IMU-based data using functional joint axes, and (2) simulated fluoroscopy-based data relying on geometrical axes were almost entirely eliminated from an initial range of 0.7°-5.1° to a mere 0.1°-0.8°. Our results confirm that different local segment frames can yield different kinematic patterns, despite following the same rotation convention, and that appropriate alignment of reference frame orientation can successfully enable consistent kinematic interpretation.

Kinematic comparison between the knee after bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty and the native knee: A cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Although bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty (BCS-TKA) is expected to provide kinematics similar to those of the normal knee, there are limited data available for comparison of the kinematics of the knee after BCS-TKA with those of the normal knee. The purpose of this study was to confirm whether the knee after BCS-TKA are the same as those of the native knee.

METHODS

Seven fresh-frozen cadavers underwent TKA using a BCS-type prosthesis with navigation system. Anteroposterior translation of the femur and internal rotation of the tibia were evaluated using the navigation system.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in anteroposterior translation of the femur between the native knee and the knee after BCS-TKA in the early flexion phase (0°-30°) or in the deep flexion phase (over 100°). In the middle flexion phase (40°-90°), the knee after BCS-TKA was placed significantly more anteriorly than the native knee. The knee after BCS-TKA also showed a gradual internal rotation pattern similar to that of the native knee but the total tibial internal rotation angle was significantly smaller than that of the native knee. At each angle from 0° to 120° of flexion, internal rotation of the knee after BCS-TKA was significantly greater than that of the native knee.

CONCLUSION

Kinematics of BCS-TKA is close to that of the native knee. However, there is a statistically significant difference in AP position of the femur during mid flexion and initial rotational position of the tibia between the BCS-TKA knee and the native knee.

Comparison of traditional PS versus kinematically designs in primary total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Kinematically designed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to restore normal kinematics by replicating the function of both cruciate ligaments. Traditional posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA designs, on the other hand, simplify knee kinematics and may improve TKA cost-effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of patients who underwent primary TKA using either a traditional PS or kinematically designed TKA.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined all patients who underwent primary TKA using either a kinematically or a traditional PS designed TKA implant, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patient demographics, complications, readmissions, revision rates and causes, range of motion (ROM) and patient reported outcomes (KOOS, JR) were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed to estimate freedom from revision, and multivariate regression was performed to control for confounding variables.

RESULTS

A total of 396 TKAs [173 (43.7%) with a kinematic design, 223 (56.3%) with a traditional design] with a mean follow-up of 3.48 ± 1.51 years underwent analysis. Revision rates did not differ between groups (9.8% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.418). In Kaplan-Meier analysis at 2-year follow-up, freedom from all-cause revision (96.4% vs. 93.1%, p = 0.139) were similar between groups. The two cohorts had no significant difference in aseptic loosening at 2 years (99.6% vs. 97.1, p = 0.050) and at latest follow up (92.7% vs. 96.4%, p = 0.279). KOOS, JR scores and post-operative ROM were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated similar mid-term outcomes following the use of both a kinematically designed and a traditionally designed implant in primary TKA patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective study-III.

How does asymmetric tibial insert affect tibiofemoral kinematics and contact stresses in total knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Asymmetric tibial insert design is expected to restore normal knee kinematics better than symmetric design. A tri-condylar implant has asymmetric and symmetric tibial inserts with a ball-and-socket joint to replace the post-cam mechanism. The purpose of this study was to compare the knee kinematics of the two designs and to measure tibiofemoral contact stresses, including that of the ball-and-socket joint.

METHODS

Using a computer simulation, the anteroposterior position and axial rotation of the femoral component were simulated during a weight-bearing deep knee bend for six validated models. Contact forces were simultaneously simulated in the medial, lateral, and ball-and-socket compartments. The relative position and the magnitude and direction of each contact force were applied to aforce/displacement control knee simulator. The contact stresses were measured individually using a pressure sensor.

RESULTS

The asymmetric tibial insert demonstrated a more posterior position of the femoral component in the lateral compartment during the entire range of motion and greater external rotation of the femoral component, compared to the symmetrical tibial insert. The mean peak contact stress of the medial and lateral compartments was < 9 Mpa, with no significant differences between the two designs except at 0°. The contact stress of the ball-and-socket joint was < 5 MPa.

CONCLUSIONS

Asymmetry of the tibial insert shows significant kinematic difference and has little influence on the peak contact stress, which is considerably lower than the yield strength of polyethylene. The asymmetric tibial insert can lead to clinical benefits owing to its kinematic and kinetic properties.

Evaluation of the balance function before and after total knee arthroplasty using Berg balance scale

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate balance function before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using Berg balance scale (BBS). The study also aimed to identify factors associated with balance impairment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-three knees in 90 patients were prospectively evaluated using their BBS scores, passive knee extension/flexion angles, Visual analogue scale for pain scores, hip-knee-ankle angles, and knee extensor/flexor muscle strengths before and after TKA. A total BBS score of less than 45 indicates an enhanced risk of multiple falls. Multivariate logistic regression models were performed to elucidate factors associated with post-operative BBS score.

RESULTS

A significant difference in mean pre- and post-operative BBS scores were noted (49.3 ± 6.4 vs. 52.2 ± 4.7) (p < 0.05). The percentage of pre- and post-operative BBS scores less than 45 were 20% and 10% (p < 0.05). Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), lower pre-operative BBS score, and larger post-operative knee flexion contracture were significantly associated with lower post-operative BBS score (p < 0.01). The post-operative knee flexion contracture greater than 10° was significantly associated with substantially high odds of post-operative BBS scores less than 45 (Odds ratio 7.6; 95% confidential interval 1.69-34.17).

CONCLUSIONS

While TKA significantly improved BBS scores, 10% of the patients remained at a risk for multiple falls. RA, lower pre-operative BBS score, and post-operative knee flexion contracture greater than 10° retained balance impairment even after TKA.

Preoperative and intraoperative factors contributing to patient satisfaction after bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

One of the causes of dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is abnormal knee kinematics. A newly designed bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA system has been developed to produce close-to-normal kinematics because of its anatomic tibiofemoral articular geometry and cam-post mechanism. Although BCS TKA is expected to improve patient satisfaction, no reports have described the appropriate technique or soft tissue handling required to achieve excellent satisfaction with BCS TKA. This study is to identify preoperative and intraoperative predictors of patient satisfaction after BCS TKA.

METHODS

Altogether, we studied 113 knees with primary varus knee osteoarthritis that underwent BCS TKA with a navigation system. Preoperative parameters including Knee Society Score and patient-reported scores [the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)] and intraoperative parameters including coronal, sagittal and axial alignment and joint laxity in each compartment that affected patient satisfaction was evaluated. Satisfaction score was evaluated with use of the 2011 Knee Society Scoring system. The multivariate regression analysis included age and preoperative and intraoperative parameters that correlated with satisfaction scores in the univariate analysis (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

The mean satisfaction score was 28.2 ± 6.1. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the predictors of patient satisfaction were a preoperative high KOOS score for activities of daily living (P < 0.001), male sex (P = 0.005), older age (P = 0.027), and minimal medial joint laxity during flexion (P = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

When performing BCS TKA, surgeons should pay attention to maintaining proper stability of the medial compartment, especially during flexion.

Comparison of in vivo knee kinematics before and after bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasty during squatting

Background

No studies have directly evaluated kinematic changes during squatting before and after bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (BCS-TKA) with the dual cam-post mechanism and asymmetric surfaces. This study investigated the effect of BCS-TKA on changes to pre- and postoperative skeletal knee kinematics, to identify factors associated with postoperative skeletal kinematic parameters.

Methods

Seventeen knees in 17 patients were prospectively recruited before primary TKA for advanced medial knee osteoarthritis. Subjects underwent BCS-TKA and were evaluated more than 1 year postoperatively. In vivo dynamic skeletal knee kinematics were evaluated using periodic radiographic images collected during squatting to quantify the tibiofemoral functional extension/flexion angle, anteroposterior (AP) translation, and axial rotation angle using image-matching techniques. Rotational alignments of femoral and tibial components were measured postoperatively using computed tomography images.

Results

The pre- and postoperative tibiofemoral functional extension/flexion angles during squatting were 12.2° ± 6.7°/100.1° ± 16.8° and 9.6° ± 8.6°/109.4° ± 16.8°, respectively, with a significant difference in flexion angle (p < .05). Total AP translation was significantly larger postoperatively than preoperatively (10.8 mm ± 3.7 mm vs. 14.4 mm ± 4.2 mm, respectively; p < .05). The pre- and postoperative total rotation angles were 6.6° ± 3.0° and 6.4° ± 3.7°, respectively, indicating no significant difference. The pre- and postoperative tibiofemoral functional flexion angles were significantly associated with each other (p = .0434, r = .49). The postoperative total rotation angle was significantly smaller when the total component rotational mismatch angle between the femoral and tibial components was above 5° vs. below 5° (4.6° ± 2.7° vs. 8.3° ± 3.9°, respectively; p < .05).

Conclusions

BCS-TKA significantly increased the tibiofemoral functional flexion angles, with larger AP translation postoperatively. Both preoperative skeletal kinematics and surgical techniques affected the skeletal kinematics of the replaced knee. A total component rotational mismatch angle greater than 5° significantly decreased postoperative total knee rotation during squatting.

Kinematics of bicruciate and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty during deep knee flexion and stair climbing

Second-generation bicruciate stabilized (BCS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was developed to substitute both anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments and replicate physiological kinematics. This study aimed to evaluate if the postcam mechanism and the surface geometry function effectively. Seventeen and twelve knees implanted with BCS TKA and posterior stabilized (PS) TKA, respectively, were analyzed. In vivo kinematics during deep knee flexion were estimated from single-plane fluoroscopic images using a 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional image registration technique. Flexion angle, anteroposterior translation, femoral external rotation (ER), and postcam engagement were compared between the groups. Postoperative 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS) was obtained at the last follow-up. The medial femoral condyle in BCS was positioned more anteriorly than that in PS from minimum flexion to maximum flexion. Posterior motion of the lateral femoral condyle was observed in both groups. ER of BCS was significantly larger compared to PS from minimum flexion to 100°. However, the amount of ER from minimum flexion to maximum flexion was similar: 6.2° ± 4.5° and 7.7° ± 4.1° in BCS and PS, respectively (P = .364). Anterior postcam engagement was observed in 76.5% and 25.0% in BCS and PS, respectively (P = .006). Posterior postcam engagement was observed in all cases in BCS and PS. There were no significant differences in KSS between the groups. The kinematic differences were likely a result of variations in articular surface geometry.

Influence of surgical factors on patient satisfaction after bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty: retrospective examination using multiple regression analysis

Background

One of the causes of dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is abnormal knee kinematics. A newly designed bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA system has been developed to produce close-to-normal kinematics because of its anatomic tibiofemoral articular geometry and cam-post mechanism. Although BCS TKA is expected to improve patient satisfaction, no reports have described the appropriate technique or soft tissue handling required to achieve excellent satisfaction with BCS TKA. This study is to identify intraoperative surgical predictors of patient satisfaction after BCS TKA.

Methods

We studied 104 knees with primary varus knee osteoarthritis that underwent BCS TKA with a navigation system retrospectively. Surgical parameters including coronal, sagittal and axial alignment and joint laxity in each compartment that affected patient satisfaction was evaluated. Satisfaction score was evaluated with use of the 2011 Knee Society Scoring system. The multivariate regression analysis included age, gender, body mass index and intraoperative parameters that correlated with satisfaction scores in the univariate analysis (P < 0.05). The current study focused on the patient satisfaction score at 1 year postoperatively and didn’t evaluate the long term clinical results nor survivorship.

Results

The postoperative satisfaction score was 28.6 ± 8.1. Multivariate analysis showed that medial joint laxity at 30° flexion (P = 0.003), tibial excessive external rotation alignment (P = 0,009) and tibial varus alignment (P = 0.029) were predictors of poor satisfaction score.

Conclusions

When performing BCS TKA, surgeons should pay attention to maintaining proper stability of the medial compartment at mid flexion range and should avoid tibial varus and excessive external rotational alignment.

Retention of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Alone May Not Achieve Physiological Knee Joint Kinematics After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The apparently physiological kinematics of the bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (BCS TKA) systems have been attributed to the anterior and posterior post-cam mechanism. Although comparisons between TKA designs with either a retained or a sacrificed cruciate ligament have been conducted, we are not aware of any analyses of 2 implants with identical bearing geometry but different cruciate-ligament strategies under equal loading conditions. Knowledge about the kinematic effect of the different cruciate ligament strategies would potentially be valuable to facilitate preoperative planning and decision-making with regard to selecting the most appropriate implant for a patient.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 20 patients: 10 treated with a BCS and 10 treated with a cruciate retaining (CR) TKA. Fluoroscopic analyses during high-flexion activities (unloaded flexion-extension and loaded lunge) were conducted at 24 months postsurgery. All patients completed the Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score, and High-Flexion Knee Score questionnaires preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

The BCS cohort showed greater femoral lateral rollback as well as a medial pivot in both activities. In contrast, the CR cohort showed a significant increase in anterior translation on the medial compartment as well as almost absent femoral lateral rollback. Higher clinical scores were observed in the BCS cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

At 24 months postsurgery, despite equal bearing geometry, retention of the posterior cruciate ligament in the CR cohort apparently was insufficient to reduce anterior shift. The BCS cohort showed expected knee joint kinematics; however, the kinematics in this cohort could eventually benefit from a smooth transition between the interchanging surfaces. Further investigation should be focused on the surgical technique and its interaction with the TKA design.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

In vivo dynamic acromiohumeral distance in shoulders with rotator cuff tears

BACKGROUND

There are no previous studies on the acromiohumeral distance in shoulders with large-to-massive full-thickness rotator cuff tears. In this study, the acromiohumeral distance in rotator cuff tear and healthy shoulders was measured using 3D-to-2D model-to-image registration techniques.

METHODS

The dynamic glenohumeral kinematics during scapular plane abduction and axial rotation were analyzed in 11 rotator cuff tear patients and 10 healthy control subjects. Periodic radiographic images of scapular plane abduction and axial rotation were taken using a flat-panel radiograph image detector. Movements of the shoulder joint were assessed using radiographic images and computed tomography-derived digitally reconstructed radiographs. The acromiohumeral distance was defined as the shortest 3D distance between the acromion and the proximal humerus.

FINDINGS

For scapular plane abduction, the rotator cuff tear group had significantly smaller acromiohumeral distance than the control group at 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, 135°, and 150° of humeral abduction (P < 0.05 at each measured angle). For axial rotation in the adducted position, the rotator cuff tear group had significantly smaller acromiohumeral distance than the control group at each point between -20° and 40° of glenohumeral external rotation (P < 0.05 at each measured angle).

INTERPRETATION

The minimum measured acromiohumeral distance was 0.9 mm in the rotator cuff tear shoulders and 2.1 mm in the healthy shoulders at 90° of scapular plane abduction. The findings are of clinical relevance because quantitative evaluation of the dynamic acromiohumeral distances in rotator cuff tear and healthy shoulders might provide important insight into subacromial impingement.