Necrosis and angioinvasion predict adverse outcome in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after curative surgical resection: results of a single-center series

Radiologic tumor border can further stratify prognosis in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PanNET), although rare in incidence, is increasing in recent years. Several clinicopathologic and molecular factors have been suggested for patient stratification due to the extensive heterogeneity of PanNETs. We aimed to discover the prognostic role of assessing the tumor border of PanNETs with pre-operative computed tomography (CT) images and correlate them with other clinicopathologic factors.

METHODS

The radiologic, macroscopic, and microscopic tumor border of 183 surgically resected PanNET cases was evaluated using preoperative CT images (well defined vs. poorly defined), gross images (expansile vs. infiltrative), and hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides (pushing vs. infiltrative). The clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of the tumor border status was compared with other clinicopathologic factors.

RESULTS

A poorly defined radiologic tumor border was observed in 65 PanNET cases (35.5 %), and were more frequent in male patients (P = 0.031), and tumor with larger size, infiltrative macroscopic growth pattern, infiltrative microscopic tumor border, higher tumor grade, higher pT category, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular and perineural invasions (all, P < 0.001). Patients with PanNET with a poorly defined radiologic tumor border had significantly worse overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS; both, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that PanNET with a poorly defined radiologic border is an independent poor prognostic factor for both OS (P = 0.049) and RFS (P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Pre-operative CT-based tumor border evaluation can provide additional information regarding survival and recurrence in patients with PanNET.

Impact of Regional Metastasis on Survival for Patients with Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the benefit of lymphadenectomy for nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNET).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) published between 1990 and 2021. Studies of functional PNET were excluded. Reported incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and survival analysis of either disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) were required for inclusion.

RESULTS

Overall, 52 studies analyzing 24,608 PNET met the inclusion criteria. The reported LNM rate for NF-PNET ranged from 7 to 64 % (median 24.5%). Reported LNM rates ranged from 7 to 51% (median 11%) for NF-PNET< 2 cm in 14 studies and 29-47% (median 38%) in NF-PNET > 2 cm. In total, 19 studies (66%) reported LNM to have a negative impact on DFS. Additionally, 21 studies (60%) reported LNM to have a negative impact on OS. Two studies investigating the impact of lymphadenectomy (LND) found LND had the greatest impact for large, high-grade tumors. The overall quality of available evidence was low as assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation System.

CONCLUSIONS

Published literature evaluating the impact of regional LNM and LND in PNET is confounded by heterogeneity in practice patterns and the retrospective nature of these cohort studies. Most studies suggest high rates of LNM in NF-PNET that negatively impact DFS and OS. Given the high rate of LNM in NF-PNET and its potential detrimental effect on DFS and OS, we recommend lymphadenectomy be completed for NF-PNET > 2 cm and strongly considered for NF-PNET < 2 cm.

Infiltrative Growth Predicts the Risk of Recurrence After Surgery in Well-Differentiated Non-Functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

The incidence of well-differentiated non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNET) increased during the last decades. The risk of relapse after curative surgery, albeit low, is not negligible; moreover, adjuvant treatment is currently not an option and a reliable predictive model based on prognostic characteristics is urgently needed for tailoring a follow-up strategy. The histological classification of PanNET now relies only on the proliferative activity (mitosis and Ki67) and staging. In contrast to other endocrine neoplasms, the role of infiltrative growth pattern in NF-PanNET is not taken into consideration at present. In the current study, 247 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for a NF-PanNET were examined for the histological growth pattern of the tumor. Two distinct patterns (non-infiltrative vs. infiltrative) were described with the latter being further subclassified according to the type of structures invaded by the tumor (non-infiltrative: pattern 1; infiltration of adjacent pancreatic parenchyma and/or peripancreatic soft tissue: pattern 2; invasion of nearby organs and/or major vessels: pattern 3). The infiltrative growth resulted to be strongly associated with a poorer survival compared to a non-infiltrative growth (p < 0.001). In particular, the distinction between pancreatic parenchyma and/or peripancreatic soft tissue invasion versus adjacent organs and/or major vessels invasion was the most powerful predictor of recurrence after surgery at multivariate analysis (pattern 2 vs. pattern 1: HR 10.136, p = 0.028; pattern 3 vs. pattern 1: HR 15.775, p = 0.015). The infiltrative growth pattern could therefore provide additional prognostic information implementing the current grading and staging system.

Practice patterns for reporting digestive system neuroendocrine neoplasms: results from a large, comprehensive international survey

AIMS

Criteria for the interpretation of digestive system neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) continue to evolve. Although there are some literature recommendations regarding workup and diagnosis of these lesions, different practice patterns exist among pathologists when signing out these specimens. The aim of this study was to assess practice trends among pathologists worldwide when reporting these neoplasms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We created an online survey with multiple questions pertaining to digestive NENs. The results were analysed based on type of practice setting, years of sign-out experience, and practice location. Respondents included 384 practicing pathologists: 70% academic, 30% private practice; 63% gastrointestinal (GI) pathology-subspecialised, 37% not; 39% North American, 42% European, 19% others; 45% with ≤10 years in practice; 55% with >10 years. Some question responses were chosen by the majority (e.g. 85% use both mitotic count and Ki67 index for grading NENs, 82% complete a synoptic, and Ki67 stain even for small incidental appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours [NETs], and 96% utilize the diagnosis of grade 3 NET). However, some questions showed varying responses, including counting mitotic figures, Ki67 stain interpretation, and pancreatic grade 3 NEN workup. Pathologists also had some variability in interpreting regional metastatic foci of small bowel NETs and in choosing blocks for Ki67 staining in multifocal lesions.

CONCLUSION

There existed scenarios wherein practice patterns varied despite recommendations in the literature, and there were also scenarios lacking clear guidelines wherein pathologists used varying judgement. This survey highlights current key grey areas in digestive system NEN evaluation, leading to variation in practice patterns.

Spliceosomic dysregulation unveils NOVA1 as a candidate actionable therapeutic target in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Dysregulation of the splicing machinery is emerging as a hallmark in cancer due to its association with multiple dysfunctions in tumor cells. Inappropriate function of this machinery can generate tumor-driving splicing variants and trigger oncogenic actions. However, its role in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is poorly defined. In this study we aimed to characterize the expression pattern of a set of splicing machinery components in PanNETs, and their relationship with aggressiveness features. A qPCR-based array was first deployed to determine the expression levels of components of the major (n = 13) and minor spliceosome (n = 4) and associated splicing factors (n = 27), using a microfluidic technology in 20 PanNETs and non-tumoral adjacent samples. Subsequently, in vivo and in vitro models were applied to explore the pathophysiological role of NOVA1. Expression analysis revealed that a substantial proportion of splicing machinery components was altered in tumors. Notably, key splicing factors were overexpressed in PanNETs samples, wherein their levels correlated with clinical and malignancy features. Using in vivo and in vitro assays, we demonstrate that one of those altered factors, NOVA1, is tightly related to cell proliferation, alters pivotal signaling pathways and interferes with responsiveness to drug treatment in PanNETs, suggesting a role for this factor in the aggressiveness of these tumors and its suitability as therapeutic target. Altogether, our results unveil a severe alteration of the splicing machinery in PanNETs and identify the putative relevance of NOVA1 in tumor development/progression, which could provide novel avenues to develop diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic tools for this pathology.

Tumour type and size are prognostic factors in gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia: A multicentre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasias (gNEN) are defined as type I if associated with atrophic body gastritis and type III when tumour is sporadic. This classification, together with grading and size, plays a crucial prognostic role. Nevertheless, the impact of these features on clinical outcome is not clear.

AIM

To identify factors predicting poor outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Analysis of type I and type III gNEN. A composite endpoint was defined if tumour-related death or metastases or angioinvasion were observed.

RESULTS

156 gNENs were evaluated: 137 (87.8%) type I and 19 (12.2%) type III. Among type I, 103 were G1 (75.2%) and 34 (24.8%) were G2. In type III group, 8 were G1 (42.1%), 10 were G2 (52.6%), and 1 was G3 (5.3%). Negative endpoint occurred in 18 patients including 10 type III and 8 type I. Male gender (p = 0.032), tumour type (p = 0.003) and size >10 mm (p = 0.024) were predictors for poor outcome, whereas Ki67 was not confirmed on multivariate analysis (p = 0.192). 5-yr survival rates in type I and type III were 100% and 76.2%, respectively (p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumour size, tumour type and gender affect clinical outcome in gNENs. In contrast to NENs rising from other sites, Ki67 plays a less important role.

Clinicopathological characteristics of non-functioning cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The biological features of cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) remain unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinicopathological characteristics of non-functioning PNETs (NF-PNETs) with a cystic component.

METHODS

The medical records of 75 patients with NF-PNETs who had undergone resection in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological factors were compared between PNETs with and without a cystic component. Expression of somatostatin 2 receptor (SSTR-2) was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Cystic PNETs were diagnosed in 14 patients (19%). The proportion of men was significantly higher for cystic than solid PNETs (79% vs. 44%, P < 0.05) and cystic PNETs were significantly larger than solid PNETs (25 mm vs. 17 mm, P < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in the prevalence of lymph node metastases (14% vs. 10%, P = 0.64), hepatic metastasis (7% vs. 3%, P = 0.54), or disease-free survival rate (both 86%, P = 0.29) between PNETs with and without a cystic component. SSTR-2 expression was more frequently observed in PNETs with a cystic component than in those without (100% vs. 70%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although cystic PNETs were larger upon diagnosis than solid PNETs in this study, prognosis after surgical resection did not differ significantly between these types of PNET. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and somatostatin analogues may be more useful for diagnosing and treating cystic PNETs, respectively.

Serum Elastase 1 Level as a Risk Factor for Postoperative Recurrence in Patients with Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

PURPOSE

This study was designed to assess the potential role of the preoperative serum level of elastase 1 as a risk factor for recurrence in patients with resectable well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNETs).

METHODS

Preoperative serum elastase 1 levels were measured in 53 patients with PanNETs who underwent complete tumor resection in two tertiary referral centers between January 2004 and June 2017. The preoperative elastase 1 levels were correlated with clinicopathological characteristics, including tumor recurrence and recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

The median elastase 1 level was 96 ng/dL (range: 21-990 ng/dL). Preoperative serum elastase 1 levels were significantly higher in those with tumors ≥ 20 mm in diameter (vs. < 20 mm, P = 0.018), WHO grade 2 (vs. grade 1, P = 0.035), and microscopic venous invasion (vs. without venous invasion, P = 0.039). The median preoperative serum level of elastase 1 was higher in patients with recurrence than in those without recurrence (251 vs. 80 ng/dL, P = 0.004). Receiver operating characteristic analysis of elastase 1 levels showed that a cutoff level of 250 ng/dL was associated with postoperative recurrence, with 63% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 94% overall accuracy. Patients with higher elastase 1 levels showed significantly worse recurrence-free survival than that of those with lower levels (2-year recurrence-free survival rate: 25% and 92%, respectively, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data provide the first evidence that high preoperative elastase 1 levels may be a risk factor for postoperative recurrence in patients with resectable PanNETs.

PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH SURGICAL RESECTION OF PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOURS

CONTEXT

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs) are rare pancreatic neoplasms. PanNETs can be treated by multimodal approach including surgery, locoregional and systemic therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study is to evaluate predictive factors of overall survival in patients with PanNETs surgically treated at a single center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study group consisted of 120 patients with PanNETs who had undergone surgery at the Center of Digestive Diseases and Liver Transplantation of Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania. Surgical resection of the primary tumor was performed in 110 patients.

RESULTS

Tumor size > 2 cm (p=0.048) (90% CI) lymph node involvement (p=0.048), ENET grade (p<0.001), distant metastases (p<0.001), Ki 67 index (<2%, 2-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, >20%) (p<0.001) were identified as significant prognostic factors for OS on univariate analysis. Using multivariate Cox proportional regression model we found that distant metastases and Ki 67 index were independent risk factors for the survival outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery with curative intent should be considered in all cases if clinically appropriate and technically feasible. High grade (Ki67 index ≥10%) tumours were associated with a 2- fold increase in risk of death as compared to those with a Ki67 <10%.

A meta-analysis of Prognostic factor of Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are a group of clinically rare and heterogeneous diseases of the pancreas. However, the prognostic factors for this disease in patients still remain controversial. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the predictive roles of those prognostic factors for pNENs. All related articles published until Sep 17, 2017 were identified via PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Ovid and the Cochrane Library. Studies that examined the prognostic factors of pNENs were enrolled. 17 articles (2822 patients) were finally included in this study. The pooled data suggested that patients with positive surgical resection margin and lymph node, advanced G stage and TMN stage, organ metastasis, vascular invasion and the necrosis of specimens had a decreased overall survival for pNENs. Similarly, patients with functional tumors might have a poor prognosis. However, age, gender, surgical type and size of tumor could not be regarded as prognostic factors for pNENs. Our analytic data demonstrated that surgical resection margin, G stage, TMN stage, lymph node, metastasis, vascular invasion and the necrosis could be prognostic factors for pNENs. Our study may assist doctors to screen patients with different prognosis more efficiently during follow-up and select appropriate treatment measures.

Grading and Prognostication of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Pancreas: A Comparison Study of Ki67 and PHH3

Grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) is currently based on mitotic rate and Ki67 proliferation index. Phosphohistone-H3 (PHH3) is an effective marker for mitosis that has been proposed to use in grading various NETs. It remains unclear which method more accurately predicts grade and clinical outcome. Cases of pNET were evaluated using immunohistochemical stains for Ki67 and PHH3. In addition, each case was evaluated for necrosis, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion and compared with stage. R project statistical analysis was used for comparisons. Sixty-three cases were included in the study including 29 males and 34 females (M:F 0.9) with a median age of 59 years (ranging 34-84). There was not a significant discrepancy in the stratification of tumor grades for Ki67 and PHH3. PHH3 significantly predicted lymph node metastasis ( p=0.041). Necrosis correlated with overall survival ( p=0.017). The results suggest that PHH3 is an effective marker for determining mitotic activity and can be used alternative to Ki67. In addition, necrosis may be included in the reporting of pNET as it may play a prognostic role. Larger scale studies are warranted to understand the biology and behavior of these tumors.

Vascularity and Tumor Size are Significant Predictors for Recurrence after Resection of a Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to identify patients at high risk of recurrence after pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) using only the grading classification, especially the G2 category, which includes both benign and low- and high-grade malignant tumors.

METHODS

Forty-one patients with PNET who underwent pancreatectomy were enrolled in this study. We defined the computed tomography (CT) ratio as the CT value of the tumor divided by that of non-tumorous pancreatic parenchyma using the late arterial phase dynamic CT. The optimal cut-off values for CT ratio and tumor size were determined using p-values that were calculated using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off values of CT ratio and tumor size for dividing patients into groups according to the greatest difference in disease-free survival (DFS) were 0.85 (p < 0.001) and 3.0 cm (p < 0.001), respectively. In analysis using Spearman's correlation coefficient, CT ratio (p = 0.007) and tumor size (p = 0.003) were individually associated with the Ki-67 proliferative index. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified that a CT ratio <0.85 (n = 10, p = 0.006) and tumor size ≥3.0 cm (n = 13, p = 0.023) were independent prognostic factors associated with DFS. All patients in the CT ratio ≥0.85 and tumor size <3.0 cm group (n = 23, including seven patients with G2 disease) did not develop recurrence after surgery. On the other hand, 5-year DFS in the CT ratio <0.85 and tumor size ≥3.0 cm group (n = 5, including three patients with G2 disease) was zero.

CONCLUSIONS

PNETs with a CT ratio <0.85 and tumor size ≥3.0 cm should be considered as having a high risk of recurrence after pancreatectomy.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: hypoenhancement on arterial phase computed tomography predicts biological aggressiveness

BACKGROUND

Contrary to pancreatic adenocarcinoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNET) are commonly hyperenhancing on arterial phase computed tomography (APCT). However, a subset of these tumours can be hypoenhancing. The prognostic significance of the CT appearance of these tumors remains unclear.

METHODS

From 2001 to 2012, 146 patients with well-differentiated PNET underwent surgical resection. The degree of tumour enhancement on APCT was recorded and correlated with clinicopathological variables and overall survival.

RESULTS

APCT images were available for re-review in 118 patients (81%). The majority had hyperenhancing tumours (n = 80, 68%), 12 (10%) were isoenhancing (including cases where no mass was visualized) and 26 (22%) were hypoenhancing. Hypoenhancing PNET were larger, more commonly intermediate grade, and had higher rates of lymph node and synchronous liver metastases. Hypoenhancing PNET were also associated with significantly worse overall survival after a resection as opposed to isoenhancing and hyperenhancing tumours (5-year, 54% versus 89% versus 93%). On multivariate analysis of factors available pre-operatively, only hypoenhancement (HR 2.32, P = 0.02) was independently associated with survival.

DISCUSSION

Hypoenhancement on APCT was noted in 22% of well-differentiated PNET and was an independent predictor of poor outcome. This information can inform pre-operative decisions in the multidisciplinary treatment of these neoplasms.