1
|
Hassan AM, Asaad M, Brook DS, Shah NR, Kumar SC, Liu J, Adelman DM, Clemens MW, Selber JC, Butler CE. Outcomes of Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with a Bovine versus a Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 152:872-881. [PMID: 36780366 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) is one of the most commonly performed procedures, yet large comparative studies comparing outcomes of AWR using bovine acellular dermal matrix (BADM) and porcine acellular dermal matrix (PADM) are lacking. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent AWR from March of 2005 to June of 2019, the primary comparative outcome measure was hernia recurrence with BADM versus PADM. The secondary outcome was the incidence of surgical-site occurrence (SSO) and surgical-site infection. A propensity score matching approach was applied to compare the clinical outcomes between the two study groups. RESULTS The authors identified 725 patients who underwent AWR using BADM (50.5%) or PADM (49.5%). Their mean ± SD age was 59.8 ± 11.5 years, mean body mass index was 31.4 ± 6.7 kg/m 2 , and mean follow-up time was 42 ± 29 months. With propensity score matching, 219 matched pairs were identified. Hernia recurrence rates in BADM (11.4%) and PADM (13.7%) groups did not differ significantly ( P = 0.793). SSO (26.5% versus 29.2%; P = 0.518) and SSI (13.2% versus 11%; P = 0.456) rates did not differ significantly in the PADM and BADM groups, respectively. Conditional logistic regression model and marginal Cox proportional hazards regression model determined that type of acellular dermal matrix was not significantly associated with SSOs (adjusted OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.70; P = 0.589) or hernia recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.42; P = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS Both BADMs and PADMs provide durable, long-term outcomes. The hernia recurrence and postoperative surgical complication rates were not significantly different between BADM and PADM. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbas M Hassan
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Malke Asaad
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Derek S Brook
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Nikhil R Shah
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Saloni C Kumar
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Jun Liu
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - David M Adelman
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Mark W Clemens
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Jesse C Selber
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Charles E Butler
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Melland-Smith M, Miller B, Petro C, Beffa L, Prabhu A, Krpata D, LaBelle M, Tamer R, Rosen M. Single-staged retromuscular abdominal wall reconstruction with mesh at the time of ostomy reversal: are we crossing the line? An ACHQC Analysis. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7051-7059. [PMID: 37353652 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10176-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The most appropriate method of reconstructing the abdominal wall at the site of a simultaneous stoma takedown is controversial. The contaminated field, concomitant GI procedure being performed and presence of a hernia all complicate decision-making. We sought to describe the surgical approaches, mesh type and outcomes of concomitant abdominal wall reconstruction during stoma takedown in a large hernia registry. METHODS AND PROCEDURES All patients who underwent stoma takedown with simultaneous hernia repair with retromuscular mesh placement from January 2014 to May 2022 were identified within the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC). Patients were stratified by mesh type including permanent synthetic (PS), resorbable synthetic (RS) and biologic mesh. Association of mesh type with 30-day wound events and other complications and 1-year outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS There were 368 patients who met inclusion criteria. Eighty-nine patients had ileostomies, 276 colostomies and 3 had both. Two hundred and seventy-nine (75.8%) patients received PS mesh, 46 (12.5%) biologic, and 43 (11.7%) RS. Seventy percent (259/368) had a parastomal hernia, 75% (285/368) had a midline incisional hernia, and 48% (178/368) had both. All groups had similar preoperative comorbidities and the majority had a transversus abdominus release. All mesh groups had similar thirty-day SSI (13.2-14.3%), SSO (10.5-17.8%) and SSOPI (7.9-14.1%), p = 0.6. Three patients with PS mesh developed infected synthetic mesh and one PS mesh required excision. Four patients with PS developed an enterocutaneous fistula. Of these, only one patient was recorded as having both an enterocutaneous fistula and mesh infection. Thirty-day reoperation and readmission were similar across all mesh groups. Recurrence at 1-year was similar between mesh groups. Quality of life measured using HerQLes scores were higher at one year compared to baseline in all groups indicating improvement in hernia-specific quality of life. CONCLUSION Early complication rates associated with simultaneous stoma takedown and abdominal wall reconstruction are significant, regardless of mesh type utilized. Concomitant surgery should be weighed heavily and tailored to individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Melland-Smith
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, Crile Building, 10th Floor, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Benjamin Miller
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, Crile Building, 10th Floor, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Clayton Petro
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, Crile Building, 10th Floor, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lucas Beffa
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, Crile Building, 10th Floor, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ajita Prabhu
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, Crile Building, 10th Floor, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David Krpata
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, Crile Building, 10th Floor, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Michael Rosen
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, Crile Building, 10th Floor, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fowler CC, Klifto KM, Wietlisbach LE, Othman S, Weiss ES, Braslow B, Kovach SJ. Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate Mesh for Ventral Hernia Repairs: A Single-Surgeon Experience. EPLASTY 2023; 23:e48. [PMID: 37664812 PMCID: PMC10472442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) (Phasix) biosynthetic mesh was recently introduced as an alternative to synthetic and biologic meshes for ventral hernia repair (VHR). However, outcomes data are limited. This study aims to analyze outcomes of VHR with P4HB mesh and identify predictors of postoperative outcomes. Methods We performed a retrospective study of adults who underwent open VHR with P4HB by the senior author from 2014 to 2020 with >12 months' follow-up. Subgroup comparisons and multivariate logistic regression were performed. Results Inclusion criteria were met by 169 patients with a median of 15 months of follow-up. Overall, 21.9% had surgical site occurrences, 17.8% required reoperation, and 4.7% had recurrences. Patients with prior VHR (47.9%) experienced similar outcomes to those without. Patients with prior mesh infection (18.3%) had higher rates of postoperative mesh infection (6.5% vs 0.7%; P = .029) but did not have higher rates of reoperation. Retrorectus repairs (45.5%) had similar outcomes to onlay repairs (54.5%). Recurrence risk was increased by hypertension (odds ratio [OR] = 13.64; P = .046), immunosuppression (OR = 42.57; P = .004), and history of prior VHR (OR = 20.20; P = .014). Conclusions This study aimed to analyze outcomes of VHR augmented with P4HB mesh through retrospective review. VHR with P4HB mesh produces acceptable recurrence rates with favorable complication risks compared with biologic and synthetic meshes. Predictors of recurrence include a history of prior hernia repair, hypertension, and immunosuppression. A history of prior mesh infection seems to place patients at risk for developing subsequent infection but did not increase need for reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cody C Fowler
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Kevin M Klifto
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Larissa E Wietlisbach
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sammy Othman
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - Eric S Weiss
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Benjamin Braslow
- Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephen J Kovach
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Katzen M, Ayuso SA, Sacco J, Ku D, Scarola GT, Kercher KW, Colavita PD, Augenstein VA, Heniford BT. Outcomes of biologic versus synthetic mesh in CDC class 3 and 4 open abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Endosc 2022; 37:3073-3083. [PMID: 35925400 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09486-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) in a contaminated field is associated with an increased risk of wound complications, infection, and reoperation. The best method of repair and mesh choice in these operations have generated marked controversy. Our aim was to compare outcomes of patients who underwent AWR with biologic versus synthetic mesh in CDC class 3 and 4 wounds. METHODS A prospective, single-institution database was queried for AWR using biologic or synthetic mesh in CDC Class 3 and 4 wounds. Hernia recurrence and complications were measured. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors predicting both. RESULTS In total, 386 patients with contaminated wounds underwent AWR, 335 with biologic and 51 with synthetic mesh. Groups were similar in age, sex, BMI, and rate of diabetes. Biologic mesh patients had larger hernia defects (298 ± 233cm2 vs. 208 ± 155cm2; p = 0.004) and a higher rate of recurrent hernias (72.2% vs 47.1%; p < 0.001), comorbidities(5.8 ± 2.7 vs. 4.2 ± 2.4, p < 0.01), and a nearly fivefold increase in Class 4 wounds (47.8% vs. 9.8%, p < 0.001), while fascial closure trended to being less common (90.7% vs 96.1%; p = 0.078). Hernia recurrence was comparable between biologic and synthetic mesh (10.4% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.132). Wound complication rates were similar (36.1% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.699), but synthetic mesh had higher rates of mesh infection (1.2% vs 11.8%; p < 0.001) and infection-related resection (0% vs 7.8%, p < 0.001), with 66% of those synthetic mesh infections requiring excision. On logistic regression, wound complications (OR 5.96 [CI 1.60-22.17]; p = 0.008) and bridging mesh (OR 13.10 [CI 2.71-63.42];p = 0.030) predicted of hernia recurrence (p < 0.05), while synthetic mesh (OR 18.6 [CI 2.35-260.4] p = 0.012) and wound complications (OR 20.6 [CI 3.15-417.7] p = 0.008) predicted mesh infection. CONCLUSIONS Wound complications in AWR with CDC class 3 and 4 wounds significantly increased mesh infection and hernia recurrence; failure to achieve fascial closure also increased hernia recurrence. Use of synthetic versus biologic mesh increased the mesh infection rate by 18.6 times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Katzen
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Sullivan A Ayuso
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Jana Sacco
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Dau Ku
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Gregory T Scarola
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Kent W Kercher
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Paul D Colavita
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Vedra A Augenstein
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - B Todd Heniford
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abouzid A, Shetiwy M, Hossam A, Abd Elghaffar M. Abdominal wall reconstruction using Omental Flap with Mesh repair following resection of Aggressive Abdominal Wall Neoplasms. Oncol Res Treat 2022; 45:415-422. [PMID: 35537417 DOI: 10.1159/000524871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection of large anterior abdominal wall tumors causes a large full-thickness abdominal wall defects, and the repair of these defects remains a challenging point. METHODS Between July 2016 and February 2021, we retrospectively reviewed the internal database registry of the Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU) Egypt, for patients with large abdominal wall defects after abdominal wall tumors resection and repair with omental flaps and synthetic Polypropylene (PP) mesh. Thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. They were analyzed for demographics, operative data including defect size, mesh size, intrabdominal tumor extension and postoperative outcomes and complications. RESULTS Thirty-Two patients with abdominal wall neoplasm underwent local resection in our center and the defect was closed with omental flap and PP mesh. The mean operative time was 143.75 ± 30.77 mins. The mean size of the abdominal wall defect was 50.78 cm2 (range: 25 - 90 cm2). The meshes used in reconstruction had a mean size of 89.53 cm2 (range: 55 - 130 cm2). The median follow-up period of the patients was 13.5 months (range: 5-54 months). Post-operative complications included infection (n = 4 cases), seroma (n = 2 cases), hematoma (n =1 case) and abnormal sensation (n = 5 cases). Tumor recurrence was reported in two cases and no cases developed incisional hernia during the follow up period. CONCLUSION Immediate use of omental flap with synthetic (PP) mesh for reconstruction of abdominal wall defects is a feasible technique and has avoided the complications associated with the use of synthetic mesh alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amr Abouzid
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mosab Shetiwy
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Amr Hossam
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Abd Elghaffar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU), Mansoura, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Timmer AS, Claessen JJM, Brouwer de Koning IM, Haenen SM, Belt EJT, Bastiaansen AJNM, Verdaasdonk EGG, Wolffenbuttel CP, Schreurs WH, Draaisma WA, Boermeester MA. Clinical outcomes of open abdominal wall reconstruction with the use of a polypropylene reinforced tissue matrix: a multicenter retrospective study. Hernia 2022; 26:1241-1250. [PMID: 35441284 PMCID: PMC9525385 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-022-02604-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Objective To assess mesh behaviour and clinical outcomes of open complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) with the use of a polypropylene reinforced tissue matrix. Methods A multicenter retrospective study of adult patients who underwent open CAWR with the use of a permanent polypropylene reinforced tissue matrix (OviTex®) between June 2019 and January 2021. Results Fifty-five consecutive patients from four hospitals in the Netherlands were analysed; 46 patients with a ventral hernia and 9 patients with an open abdomen. Most patients with a ventral hernia had one or more complicating comorbidities (91.3%) and one or more complicating hernia characteristics (95.7%). Most procedures were performed in a (clean) contaminated surgical field (69.6% CDC 2–4; 41.3% CDC 3–4). All nine patients with an open abdomen underwent semi-emergent surgery. Twelve out of 46 patients with a ventral hernia (26.1%) and 4 of 9 patients with an open abdomen (44.4%) developed a postoperative surgical site infection that made direct contact with the mesh as confirmed on computed tomography (CT), suspicious of mesh infection. No patient needed mesh explantation for persistent infection of the mesh. During a median follow-up of 13 months, 4 of 46 ventral hernia patients (8.7%) developed a CT confirmed hernia recurrence. Conclusion Polypropylene reinforced tissue matrix can withstand infectious complications and provides acceptable mid-term recurrence rates in this retrospective study on open complex abdominal wall reconstructions. Longer follow-up data from prospective studies are required to determine further risk of hernia recurrence. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10029-022-02604-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allard S Timmer
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J M Claessen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Suzanne M Haenen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eric J T Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Werner A Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Marja A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shao JM, Ayuso SA, Deerenberg EB, Elhage SA, Prasad T, Colavita PD, Augenstein VA, Heniford BT. Biologic mesh is non-inferior to synthetic mesh in CDC class 1 & 2 open abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg 2021; 223:375-379. [PMID: 34140156 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biologic mesh has historically been used in contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions (AWRs). No study has compared outcomes of biologic and synthetic in clean and clean-contaminated hernia ventral hernia repair. METHODS A prospective AWR database identified patients undergoing open, preperitoneal AWR with biologic mesh in CDC class 1 and 2 wounds. Using propensity score matching, a matched cohort of patients with synthetic mesh was created. The objective was to assess recurrence rates and postoperative complications. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients were matched in each group. Patient in the biologic group had higher rates of immunosuppression, history of transplantation, and inflammatory bowel disease (p ≤ 0.05). Operative variables were comparable for biologic vs synthetic, including defect size (230.5 ± 135.4 vs 268.7 ± 194.5 cm2, p = 0.62), but the synthetic mesh group had larger meshes placed (575.6 ± 247.0 vs 898.8 ± 246.0 cm2 p < 0.0001). Wound infections (15.5% vs 8.9%, p = 0.28) were equivalent, and recurrence rates (1.7% vs 3.4%, p = 1.00) were similar on follow up (19.3 ± 23.3 vs 23.3 ± 29.7 months, p = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS In matched, lower risk, complex AWR patients with large hernia defects, biologic and synthetic meshes have equal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny M Shao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Sullivan A Ayuso
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Eva B Deerenberg
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sharbel A Elhage
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Tanu Prasad
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Paul D Colavita
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Vedra A Augenstein
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - B Todd Heniford
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Charleux-Muller D, Romain B, Boisson C, Velten M, Brigand C, Lejeune C. Cost-effectiveness analysis of resorbable biosynthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repair. J Visc Surg 2021; 159:279-285. [PMID: 34116953 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare, in terms of cost and serious complications, the use of biosynthetic resorbable parietal mesh with biologic mesh in patients undergoing contaminated ventral hernia repair (modified Ventral Hernia Working Group grade 3). Poly-4-hydroxy-butyrate (P4HB) biosynthetic mesh has rarely been the subject of comparative studies in the context of contamination. Data are required to confirm the effects of a transition from biological mesh to biosynthetic resorbable mesh. PATIENTS AND METHODS A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted. It was based on a decision analysis model built with clinical and economic data issued from a before-after study that included 94 patients hospitalized for ventral hernia repair at the University Hospital of Strasbourg (France) from June 2011 to February 2018. The effectiveness endpoint was the number of patients presenting with a serious specific complication or a general complication at 6 months. Data for surgical hospitalization stays, home hospitalizations and ambulatory care costs were included. RESULTS We found fewer serious complications with biosynthetic mesh: 21% versus 33% with biologic mesh. A cost savings of US $5146 was determined. Deterministic sensitivity analyses and a probabilistic analysis confirmed our findings and the robustness of the model. CONCLUSION P4HB biosynthetic resorbable mesh appeared to be the most effective and the least costly option. Additional data will be needed to confirm the superiority of biosynthetic mesh in terms of the recurrence risk reduction over a longer period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Charleux-Muller
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
| | - B Romain
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - C Boisson
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Clinical Investigation Center, INSERM, CIC1432, Dijon University Hospital
| | - M Velten
- Department of Public Health, INSERM, UMR-S1113, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 place de l'hôpital, 67100 Strasbourg, France
| | - C Brigand
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - C Lejeune
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Clinical Investigation Center, INSERM, CIC1432, Dijon University Hospital; INSERM, LNC UMR1231, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Outcomes of mid-term and long-term degradable biosynthetic meshes in single-stage open complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Hernia 2021; 25:1647-1657. [PMID: 34097187 PMCID: PMC8182350 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02415-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess clinical outcomes in patients that underwent open single-stage complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) with biosynthetic mesh. METHODS Retrospective observational study of two prospectively registered series of consecutive patients undergoing CAWR with either long-term degradable (LTD) Phasix™ or mid-term degradable (MTD) BIO-A® biosynthetic mesh in a single institution between June 2016 and December 2019. RESULTS From 169 patients with CAWR, 70 consecutive patients were identified who underwent CAWR with either LTD or MTD biosynthetic mesh. More than 85% of patients had an incisional hernia that could be classified as moderately complex to major complex due to a previous wound infection (67%), one or more complicating comorbidities (87.1%), one or more complicating hernia characteristics (75.7%) or contaminated or dirty defects (37.1%). Concomitant component separation was performed in 43 of 70 patients (61.4%). Overall surgical site infection (SSI) rate in these CAWR patients was 45.7%. Seventeen of 70 patients (24.3%) had computed tomography (CT) - and culture-confirmed SSI in direct contact of mesh, suspicious of mesh infection. Mesh removal for persistent local infection occurred in 10% (7 of 70) after a median of 229 days since surgery. Salvage rate of mesh after direct contact with infection was 58.8%. All removed meshes were in the LTD group. Seven patients (10%) had a recurrence; four patients in the LTD group (10%) had a recurrence at a median follow-up of 35 months and three patients in the MTD group (10%) at a median follow-up of 11 months. Three of the seven recurrences occurred in patients with SSI in persistent and direct contact with mesh. CONCLUSIONS Comorbid patients undergoing open complex abdominal wall reconstruction are at high risk of postoperative wound complications regardless of which type of biosynthetic mesh is used. When in persistent and direct contact with infection, long-term biodegradable biosynthetic meshes may need to be removed, whereas mid-term biodegradable biosynthetic meshes can be salvaged.
Collapse
|
10
|
Lindsey JT, Boyd CJ, Davis C, Wilson J, Kurapati S, de la Torre JI. The Case for Onlay Biologic Mesh in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Using Progressive Tension Suture Fixation. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86:S498-S502. [PMID: 34100806 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After many years of debate, underlay and sublay placement of mesh slowly emerged as the standard of care in abdominal wall reconstruction because of lower hernia recurrence rates. However, onlay has the advantages of being faster, less invasive, and technically easier compared with underlay and sublay. Therefore, if a similar recurrence could be achieved, then onlay should be a consideration. In this study, we present a new onlay method using multipoint progressive tension suture fixation. METHODS This was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction from 2012 to 2019. Inclusion criteria included onlay mesh placement and at least 1 year of follow-up. The core principles of the surgical technique are establishing myofascial continuity by component separation and reinforcing the repair with onlay mesh that is fixated with multipoint progressive tension sutures. RESULTS The number of patients after exclusions was 59, and the average body mass index was 32.52 ± 6.44 kg/m2. More than half (62.7%) of patients had a history of hypertension, 95% had at least 1 prior abdominal/pelvic surgery, and 61% had at least 1 prior hernia repair. Postoperative complications included 20.3% of patients requiring drainage of a fluid collection in the clinic setting, and 29.3% of patients requiring return to the operating room for any reason (including superficial wound debridement). The average defect size was 231.88 ± 195.86 cm2, the mean follow-up was 3.11 ± 1.83 years, and the recurrence rate was 5.1%. CONCLUSIONS We report a hernia recurrence rate of 5.1% in a high-risk population with complex defects at a mean of 3.1 years of follow-up using onlay mesh fixated with multipoint progressive tension sutures. This recurrence rate is similar to that reported for both underlay and sublay techniques. However, the onlay approach is technically easier, faster, and less invasive compared with underlay and sublay techniques, which may translate into wider reproducibility, lower costs, and improved patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John T Lindsey
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine
| | - Carter J Boyd
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine
| | - Claire Davis
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine
| | - John Wilson
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine
| | - Srikanth Kurapati
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Samson DJ, Gachabayov M, Latifi R. Biologic Mesh in Surgery: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Selected Outcomes in 51 Studies and 6079 Patients. World J Surg 2021; 45:3524-3540. [PMID: 33416939 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05887-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent decades, biologic mesh (BM) has become an important adjunct to surgical practice. Recent evidence-based clinical applications of BM include but are not limited to: reconstruction of abdominal wall defects; breast reconstruction; face, head and neck surgery; periodontal surgery; other hernia repairs (diaphragmatic, hiatal/paraesophageal, inguinal and perineal); hand surgery; and shoulder arthroplasty. Prior systematic reviews of BM in complex abdominal wall hernia repair had several shortcomings that our comprehensive review seeks to address, including exclusion of laparoscopic repair, assessment of risk of bias, use of an acceptable meta-analytic method and review of risk factors identified in multivariable regression analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS We sought articles of BM for open ventral hernia repair reporting on early complications, late complications or recurrences and included minimum of 50. We used the quality in prognostic studies risk of bias assessment tool. Random effects meta-analysis was applied. RESULTS This comprehensive review selected 62 articles from 51 studies that included 6,079 patients. Meta-analytic pooling found that early complications are present in about 50%, surgical site occurrences (SSOs) in 37%, surgical site infections (SSIs) in 18%, reoperation in 7%, readmission in 20% and mortality in 3%. Meta-analytic estimates of late outcomes included overall complications (42%), SSOs (40%) and SSIs (22%). Specific SSOs included seroma (14%), hematoma (4%), abscess (10%), necrosis (5%), dehiscence (8%) and fistula formation (5%). Reoperation occurred in about 17%, mesh explantation in 9% and recurrence in 36%. CONCLUSION Estimates of nearly all outcomes from individual studies were highly heterogeneous and sensitivity analyses and meta-regressions generally failed to explain this heterogeneity. Recurrence is the only outcome for which there are consistent findings for risk factors. Bridge placement of BM is associated with higher risk of recurrence. Prior hernia repair, history of reintervention and history of mesh removal were also risk factors for increased recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Samson
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, 100 Woods Road, Taylor Pavilion, Suite D-353, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| | - Mahir Gachabayov
- Department of Surgery, New York Medical College, School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| | - Rifat Latifi
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, 100 Woods Road, Taylor Pavilion, Suite D-353, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA. .,Department of Surgery, New York Medical College, School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The Biosynthetic Option as an Alternative in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 85:158-162. [DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
13
|
Gogna S, Latifi R, Choi J, Con J, Prabhakaran K, Smiley A, Anderson PL. Predictors of 30- and 90-Day Readmissions After Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction With Biological Mesh: A Longitudinal Study of 232 Patients. World J Surg 2020; 44:3720-3728. [PMID: 32734453 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05714-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospital readmissions are recognized as indicators of poor healthcare services which further increase patient morbidity. The aim of this study is to analyze predicting factors for the 30-day and 90-day readmissions after a complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR). METHODS A pooled analysis of the prospective study and retrospective database patients undergoing CAWR with acellular porcine dermis from 2012 to 2019 was carried out. Independent t test for continuous variables and Chi-square and Fischer's exact tests for categorical variables were used. A multivariable logistic regression model and linear regression analysis were used to analyze the independent predictors of 30-day and 90-day readmissions. RESULTS A total of 232 patients underwent CAWR, and the readmission rate (RR) was 16.8% (n = 40). The 30-day and 90-day RR was 11.3% (n = 23) and 13.3% (n = 33), respectively. There were no statistical differences in age, frailty, and gender distribution between the two groups. There was no difference in ASA score, type of component separation, ventral hernia working group class, size of the biological mesh, placement of mesh, and intestinal resection rate. The Clavien-Dindo complications and mean comprehensive complication index (CCI) were higher in the readmission group as compared to no readmission group (p < 0.01). Readmitted patients had higher surgical site infections (p < 0.01) and wound necrosis (p = 0.01). Higher CCI, past or concomitant pelvic surgery, and the presence of enterocutaneous fistula were independent predictors of earlier days to readmission. CONCLUSION Surgical site occurrences were associated with 30-day and 90-day readmissions after CAWR, while the presence of ascites and dialysis was associated with 90-day readmissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shekhar Gogna
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, 100 Woods Road, Taylor Pavilion, Office Suite #353, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| | - Rifat Latifi
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
| | - James Choi
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, 100 Woods Road, Taylor Pavilion, Office Suite #353, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| | - Jorge Con
- Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, 100 Woods Road, Taylor Pavilion E-131, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| | - Kartik Prabhakaran
- Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, 100 Woods Road, Taylor Pavilion, Office E150, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| | - Abbas Smiley
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| | - Patrice L Anderson
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, 100 Woods Road, Taylor Pavilion, Office E-145, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhao X, Cao Z, Nie Y, Liu J, Yuan X, Chen J, Shen Y. Retrospective analysis of defect reconstruction after abdominal wall tumor resection in 30 patients. Hernia 2020; 25:375-381. [PMID: 32451791 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02219-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is difficult to manage the full-thickness defect that is created by radical resection of an abdominal wall tumor. This report aimed to review our institutional experience with immediate reconstruction using mesh reinforcement after abdominal wall tumor resection. METHODS We retrospectively examined patients who underwent abdominal wall tumor resection with immediate mesh-reinforced reconstruction between April 2014 and November 2018. The patients' records were reviewed to collect data regarding their demographic characteristics, surgical procedures, and complications. RESULTS We identified 30 eligible patients, including 5 who underwent simultaneous resection of affected intra-abdominal organs or tissues. The median size of the resulting abdominal wall defect was 60 cm2 (interquartile range: 32-127.5 cm2) and the median mesh size was 150 cm2 (interquartile range: 150-225 cm2). The median operative time was 85 min (interquartile range: 60-133.8 min), the mean hospital stay was 19.4 ± 9.0 days, and the mean follow-up period was 28.6 ± 16.0 months. The complications included seroma (n = 4), infection (n = 2), massive hematoma (n = 1), and abnormal sensation (n = 3). Tumor recurrence was observed in two patients, and three patients died because of cancer progression. No patient developed a ventral hernia or abdominal bulging. CONCLUSION Immediate mesh-reinforced reconstruction is feasible and effective for patients who require abdominal wall tumor resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Zhao
- Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Z Cao
- The Third Clinical Medical School of Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Y Nie
- Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - J Liu
- Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - X Yuan
- Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - J Chen
- Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
| | - Y Shen
- Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Minor S, Brown CJ, Rooney PS, Hodde JP, Julien L, Scott TM, Karimuddin AA, Raval MJ, Phang PT. Single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a novel antibiotic-impregnated biologic porcine submucosa tissue matrix. BMC Surg 2020; 20:58. [PMID: 32228664 PMCID: PMC7106678 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-00715-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Single-stage repair of incisional hernias in contaminated fields has a high rate of surgical site infection (30–42%) when biologic grafts are used for repair. In an attempt to decrease this risk, a novel graft incorporating gentamicin into a biologic extracellular matrix derived from porcine small intestine submucosa was developed. Methods This prospective, multicenter, single-arm observational study was designed to determine the incidence of surgical site infection following implantation of the device into surgical fields characterized as CDC Class II, III, or IV. Results Twenty-four patients were enrolled, with 42% contaminated and 25% dirty surgical fields. After 12 months, 5 patients experienced 6 surgical site infections (21%) with infection involving the graft in 2 patients (8%). No grafts were explanted. Conclusions The incorporation of gentamicin into a porcine-derived biologic graft can be achieved with no noted gentamicin toxicity and a low rate of device infection for patients undergoing single-stage repair of ventral hernia in contaminated settings. Trial registration The study was registered March 27, 2015 at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02401334.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Minor
- QE2 Hospital, QEII Health Sciences Centre Dalhousie University, 1278 Tower Road, Halifax, NS, B3H 2Y9, Canada.
| | - Carl J Brown
- St. Paul's Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Paul S Rooney
- Royal Liverpool Hospital, Prescot Street, Merseyside, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK
| | - Jason P Hodde
- Cook Biotech Incorporated, 1425 Innovation Place, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, USA
| | - Lisa Julien
- QE2 Hospital, QEII Health Sciences Centre Dalhousie University, 1278 Tower Road, Halifax, NS, B3H 2Y9, Canada
| | - Tracy M Scott
- St. Paul's Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Ahmer A Karimuddin
- St. Paul's Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Manoj J Raval
- St. Paul's Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - P Terry Phang
- St. Paul's Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pruimboom T, Ploegmakers IBM, Bijkerk E, Breukink SO, van der Hulst RRWJ, Qiu SS. Fasciocutaneous anterolateral thigh flaps for complex abdominal wall reconstruction after resection of enterocutaneous fistulas and the role of indocyanine green angiography: a pilot study. Hernia 2020; 25:321-329. [PMID: 32219573 PMCID: PMC8055571 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02167-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Purpose No previous study reported the use of a fasciocutaneous anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap combined with a biological mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) after enterocutaneous fistula (ECF) in a single-staged procedure and the use of Indocyanine Green Angiography (ICGA) intraoperatively. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of this procedure and to examine the added value of ICGA in minimizing postoperative complications. Methods A single-institution review of a prospectively maintained database was conducted at Maastricht University Medical Center. To evaluate the feasibility and safety of this procedure, early (≤ 30 days) and late (> 30 days) postoperative complications were assessed. ECF recurrence was considered the primary outcome. To examine the added value of ICGA, complications in the ICGA group and the non-ICGA group were compared descriptively. Results Ten consecutive patients, with a mean age of 66.7 years, underwent a single-staged AWR with fasciocutaneous ALT flaps. Mean follow-up was 17.4 months (4.3–28.2). Two early ECF recurrences were observed. Both restored without the need for reoperation. A lower rate of early complications was observed in the ICGA group compared to the non-ICGA group. Conclusion The combination of a biological mesh and fasciocutaneous ALT flap is feasible and safe in AWR after ECF repair in a single-staged approach, with an acceptable complication rate in a cohort of complex patients operated in a dedicated center. ECF closure was achieved in all patients. ICGA seems to be of great added value in minimizing postoperative complications during AWR. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10029-020-02167-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Pruimboom
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - I B M Ploegmakers
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E Bijkerk
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - S O Breukink
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R R W J van der Hulst
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - S S Qiu
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Russello D, Sofia M, Conti P, Latteri S, Pesce A, Scaravilli F, Vasta F, Trombatore G, Randazzo V, Schembari E, Barchitta M, Agodi A, La Greca G. A retrospective, Italian multicenter study of complex abdominal wall defect repair with a Permacol biological mesh. Sci Rep 2020; 10:3367. [PMID: 32099052 PMCID: PMC7042221 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60019-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Complex abdominal wall defects (CAWDs) can be difficult to repair and using a conventional synthetic mesh is often unsuitable. A biological mesh might offer a solution for CAWD repair, but the clinical outcomes are unclear. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of a cross-linked, acellular porcine dermal collagen matrix implant (Permacol) for CAWD repair in a cohort of 60 patients. Here, 58.3% patients presented with a grade 3 hernia (according to the Ventral Hernia Working Group grading system) and a contaminated surgical field. Permacol was implanted as a bridge in 46.7%, as an underlay (intraperitoneal position) in 38.3% and as a sublay (retromuscolar position) in 15% of patients. Fascia closure was achieved in 53.3% of patients. The surgical site occurrence rate was 35% and the defect size significantly influenced the probability of post-operative complications. The long-term (2 year) hernia recurrence rate was 36.2%. This study represents the first large multi-centre Italian case series on Permacol implants in patients with a CAWD. Our data suggest that Permacol is a feasible strategy to repair a CAWD, with acceptable early complications and long-term (2 year) recurrence rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Russello
- General Surgery, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Maria Sofia
- General Surgery, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
| | - Piero Conti
- General Surgery, Civil Hospital, Lentini, Italy
| | - Saverio Latteri
- General Surgery, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonino Pesce
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Vasta
- General Surgery, "San Vincenzo" Hospital, Taormina, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Martina Barchitta
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonella Agodi
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Gaetano La Greca
- General Surgery, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
de Vries FEE, Claessen JJM, Atema JJ, van Ruler O, Boermeester MA. Immediate Closure of Abdominal Cavity with Biologic Mesh versus Temporary Abdominal Closure of Open Abdomen in Non-Trauma Emergency Patients (CLOSE-UP Study). Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2020; 21:694-703. [PMID: 32097095 DOI: 10.1089/sur.2019.289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: In more than 10% of emergency laparotomies in non-trauma patients, primary fascial closure is not achievable because of excessive visceral edema, which leaves the patient with an open abdomen (OA). An OA harbors an inherent high risk of serious complications, and temporary closure devices are used to achieve delayed fascial closure. A potential new strategy in preventing OA is immediate closure during the emergency procedure with a non-crosslinked biologic mesh. Methods: This is a prospective comparative cohort feasibility study in 13 teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Non-trauma patients who underwent emergency laparotomy in which regular sutured primary fascial closure was not achievable because of excessive intra-abdominal edema were eligible. In one cohort, Biomesh (n = 20), the abdominal cavity was immediately closed at the emergency laparotomy with a non-crosslinked biologic mesh. In a parallel cohort, Control (n = 20), the resulting OA was managed by temporary abdominal closure (TAC; inlay polyglactin [Vicryl™] mesh [n = 7]) or commercial (ABTheraTM) abdominal negative pressure therapy device (n = 13)). The primary end point was the proportion of closed abdominal cavities at 90 days. Results: At 90 days, 65% (13/20) of the abdominal cavities were closed in the Biomesh cohort versus 45% (9/20) in Controls (p = 0.204). In the Biomesh cohort, seven of 20 (35%) patients had at least one major complication versus 15 of 20 (75%) patients in the Control cohort (p = 0.011). Both the median number of intensive care unit (ICU) and mechanical ventilation days were significantly lower in the Biomesh cohort; one versus 10 (p = 0.002) and 0 versus four (p = 0.003) days, respectively. The number of abdominal reoperations was significantly lower in the Biomesh cohort (median 0 vs. two, p < 0.001; total number five vs. 44). Conclusions: If primary fascial closure cannot be achieved at the emergency laparotomy in non-trauma patients, immediate abdominal closure by use of a non-crosslinked biologic mesh prevents OA management. This results in a non-significant higher proportion of closed abdominal cavities at 90 days compared with OA management with TAC techniques, and in a significant reduction of major complications and reoperations, and a shorter ICU stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fleur E E de Vries
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J M Claessen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jasper J Atema
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Oddeke van Ruler
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands
| | - Marja A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
The use of synthetic mesh in contaminated and infected abdominal wall repairs: challenging the dogma—A long-term prospective clinical trial. Hernia 2019; 24:307-323. [DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-02035-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
20
|
|
21
|
Grainger JT, Maeda Y, Donnelly SC, Vaizey CJ. Assessment and management of patients with intestinal failure: a multidisciplinary approach. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2018; 11:233-241. [PMID: 29928141 PMCID: PMC6003282 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s122868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Intestinal failure (IF) is a condition characterized by the inability to maintain a state of adequate nutrition, or fluid and electrolyte balance due to an anatomical or a physiological disorder of the gastrointestinal system. IF can be an extremely debilitating condition, significantly affecting the quality of life of those affected. The surgical management of patients with acute and chronic IF requires a specialist team who has the expertise in terms of technical challenges and decision-making. A dedicated IF unit will have the expertise in patient selection for surgery, investigative workup and planning, operative risk assessment with relevant anesthetic expertise, and a multidisciplinary team with support such as nutritional expertise and interventional radiology. This article covers the details of IF management, including the classification of IF, etiology, prevention of IF, and initial management of IF, focusing on sepsis treatment and nutritional support. It also covers the surgical aspects of IF such as intestinal reconstruction, abdominal wall reconstruction, and intestinal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennie T Grainger
- The Lennard Jones Intestinal Failure Unit, St. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Yasuko Maeda
- The Lennard Jones Intestinal Failure Unit, St. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK.,Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Suzanne C Donnelly
- The Lennard Jones Intestinal Failure Unit, St. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Carolynne J Vaizey
- The Lennard Jones Intestinal Failure Unit, St. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK.,Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Köckerling F, Alam NN, Antoniou SA, Daniels IR, Famiglietti F, Fortelny RH, Heiss MM, Kallinowski F, Kyle-Leinhase I, Mayer F, Miserez M, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Muysoms F, Narang SK, Petter-Puchner A, Reinpold W, Scheuerlein H, Smietanski M, Stechemesser B, Strey C, Woeste G, Smart NJ. What is the evidence for the use of biologic or biosynthetic meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction? Hernia 2018; 22:249-269. [PMID: 29388080 PMCID: PMC5978919 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-018-1735-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although many surgeons have adopted the use of biologic and biosynthetic meshes in complex abdominal wall hernia repair, others have questioned the use of these products. Criticism is addressed in several review articles on the poor standard of studies reporting on the use of biologic meshes for different abdominal wall repairs. The aim of this consensus review is to conduct an evidence-based analysis of the efficacy of biologic and biosynthetic meshes in predefined clinical situations. METHODS A European working group, "BioMesh Study Group", composed of invited surgeons with a special interest in surgical meshes, formulated key questions, and forwarded them for processing in subgroups. In January 2016, a workshop was held in Berlin where the findings were presented, discussed, and voted on for consensus. Findings were set out in writing by the subgroups followed by consensus being reached. For the review, 114 studies and background analyses were used. RESULTS The cumulative data regarding biologic mesh under contaminated conditions do not support the claim that it is better than synthetic mesh. Biologic mesh use should be avoided when bridging is needed. In inguinal hernia repair biologic and biosynthetic meshes do not have a clear advantage over the synthetic meshes. For prevention of incisional or parastomal hernias, there is no evidence to support the use of biologic/biosynthetic meshes. In complex abdominal wall hernia repairs (incarcerated hernia, parastomal hernia, infected mesh, open abdomen, enterocutaneous fistula, and component separation technique), biologic and biosynthetic meshes do not provide a superior alternative to synthetic meshes. CONCLUSION The routine use of biologic and biosynthetic meshes cannot be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Köckerling
- Department of Surgery and Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Vivantes Hospital, 13585, Berlin, Germany.
| | - N N Alam
- Department of General Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - S A Antoniou
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
| | - I R Daniels
- Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - F Famiglietti
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg Campus, Louvain, Belgium
| | - R H Fortelny
- Department of General Surgery, Wilhelminenspital, Medical Faculty, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - M M Heiss
- Department of Visceral-, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, University Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany
| | - F Kallinowski
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Regional Hospital Bergstrasse GmbH, Heppenheim, Germany
| | | | - F Mayer
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - M Miserez
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg Campus, Louvain, Belgium
| | - A Montgomery
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - S Morales-Conde
- Unit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of General und Digestive Surgery, University Hospital "Virgen del Rocio", Seville, Spain
| | - F Muysoms
- Department of Surgery, AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium
| | - S K Narang
- Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - A Petter-Puchner
- Austrian Cluster of Tissue Regeneration, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria
| | - W Reinpold
- Department of Surgery and Hernia Center, Wilhelmsburger Hospital "Gross Sand", Hamburg, Germany
| | - H Scheuerlein
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, St. Vincenz Hospital, Paderborn, Germany
| | - M Smietanski
- Department of Surgery & Hernia Centre, District Hospital in Puck, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - C Strey
- Department of Surgery, Friederiken-Hospital, Hanover, Germany
| | - G Woeste
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - N J Smart
- Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sartelli M, Guirao X, Hardcastle TC, Kluger Y, Boermeester MA, Raşa K, Ansaloni L, Coccolini F, Montravers P, Abu-Zidan FM, Bartoletti M, Bassetti M, Ben-Ishay O, Biffl WL, Chiara O, Chiarugi M, Coimbra R, De Rosa FG, De Simone B, Di Saverio S, Giannella M, Gkiokas G, Khokha V, Labricciosa FM, Leppäniemi A, Litvin A, Moore EE, Negoi I, Pagani L, Peghin M, Picetti E, Pintar T, Pupelis G, Rubio-Perez I, Sakakushev B, Segovia-Lohse H, Sganga G, Shelat V, Sugrue M, Tarasconi A, Tranà C, Ulrych J, Viale P, Catena F. 2018 WSES/SIS-E consensus conference: recommendations for the management of skin and soft-tissue infections. World J Emerg Surg 2018; 13:58. [PMID: 30564282 PMCID: PMC6295010 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-018-0219-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) encompass a variety of pathological conditions that involve the skin and underlying subcutaneous tissue, fascia, or muscle, ranging from simple superficial infections to severe necrotizing infections. SSTIs are a frequent clinical problem in surgical departments. In order to clarify key issues in the management of SSTIs, a task force of experts met in Bertinoro, Italy, on June 28, 2018, for a specialist multidisciplinary consensus conference under the auspices of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and the Surgical Infection Society Europe (SIS-E). The multifaceted nature of these infections has led to a collaboration among general and emergency surgeons, intensivists, and infectious disease specialists, who have shared these clinical practice recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xavier Guirao
- 0000 0000 9238 6887grid.428313.fUnit of Endocrine, Head, and Neck Surgery and Unit of Surgical Infections Support, Department of General Surgery, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Sabadell, Spain
| | - Timothy C. Hardcastle
- Trauma Service, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital and Department of Surgery, Nelson R Mandela School of Clinical Medicine, Durban, South Africa
| | - Yoram Kluger
- 0000 0000 9950 8111grid.413731.3Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Marja. A. Boermeester
- 0000000404654431grid.5650.6Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Kemal Raşa
- Department of Surgery, Anadolu Medical Center, Kocaali, Turkey
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- 0000 0004 1758 8744grid.414682.dGeneral Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- 0000 0004 1758 8744grid.414682.dGeneral Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Philippe Montravers
- 0000 0000 8588 831Xgrid.411119.dAnesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Cite University, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, HUPNSV, Paris, France
| | - Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
- 0000 0001 2193 6666grid.43519.3aDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Michele Bartoletti
- 0000 0004 1757 1758grid.6292.fInfectious Diseases Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Bassetti
- 0000 0001 2113 062Xgrid.5390.fInfectious Diseases Division, Department of Medicine University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Intergrata di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Offir Ben-Ishay
- 0000 0000 9950 8111grid.413731.3Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Walter L. Biffl
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Osvaldo Chiara
- General Surgery-Trauma Team, State University of Milano, Niguarda Hospital Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- grid.414498.4Emergency Surgery Unit, State University of Pisa, Cisanello Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Raul Coimbra
- 0000 0000 9852 649Xgrid.43582.38Riverside University Health System Medical Center and Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Moreno Valley, CA USA
| | - Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa
- 0000 0001 2336 6580grid.7605.4Department of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Unit of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Regional Hospital of Perpignan, Perpignan, France
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- 0000 0004 0383 8386grid.24029.3dDepartment of Surgery, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Maddalena Giannella
- 0000 0004 1757 1758grid.6292.fInfectious Diseases Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - George Gkiokas
- 0000 0001 2155 0800grid.5216.0Second Department of Surgery, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Vladimir Khokha
- Department of Emergency Surgery, City Hospital, Mozyr, Belarus
| | | | - Ari Leppäniemi
- Abdominal Center, University Hospital Meilahti, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Andrey Litvin
- 0000 0001 1018 9204grid.410686.dDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Regional Clinical Hospital, Kaliningrad, Russian Federation
| | - Ernest E. Moore
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO USA
| | - Ionut Negoi
- Department of Surgery, Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Leonardo Pagani
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Bolzano Central Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Maddalena Peghin
- 0000 0001 2113 062Xgrid.5390.fInfectious Diseases Division, Department of Medicine University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Intergrata di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Edoardo Picetti
- grid.411482.aDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Tadeja Pintar
- 0000 0004 0571 7705grid.29524.38Department of Surgery, UMC Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Guntars Pupelis
- 0000 0004 0375 2558grid.488518.8Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Riga East University Hospital ‘Gailezers’, Riga, Latvia
| | - Ines Rubio-Perez
- 0000 0000 8970 9163grid.81821.32General Surgery Department, Colorectal Surgery Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Boris Sakakushev
- 0000 0001 0726 0380grid.35371.33General Surgery Department, Medical University, University Hospital St George, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Helmut Segovia-Lohse
- 0000 0001 2289 5077grid.412213.7Second Department of Surgery, Hospital de Clínicas, Universidad Nacional de Asuncion, San Lorenzo, Paraguay
| | - Gabriele Sganga
- 0000 0001 0941 3192grid.8142.fEmergency Surgery (or Division of Emergency Surgery), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS – Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Vishal Shelat
- grid.240988.fGeneral Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Michael Sugrue
- 0000 0004 0617 6488grid.415900.9Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital and Donegal Clinical Research Academy, Letterkenny, Ireland
| | - Antonio Tarasconi
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Cristian Tranà
- Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| | - Jan Ulrych
- 0000 0000 9100 9940grid.411798.2First Department of Surgery, Department of Abdominal, Thoracic Surgery and Traumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pierluigi Viale
- 0000 0004 1757 1758grid.6292.fInfectious Diseases Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- 0000 0001 0941 3192grid.8142.fEmergency Surgery (or Division of Emergency Surgery), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS – Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dumanian GA, Lanier ST, Souza JM, Young MW, Mlodinow AS, Boller AM, Mueller KH, Halverson AL, McGee MF, Stulberg JJ. Mesh sutured repairs of contaminated incisional hernias. Am J Surg 2017; 216:267-273. [PMID: 29108644 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2017] [Revised: 09/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to evaluate the results of a new mesh sutured repair technique for closure of contaminated incisional hernias. METHODS 48 patients with contaminated hernias 5 cm wide or greater by CT scan were closed with mesh sutures. Surgical site occurrence, infections, and hernia recurrence were compared to similar patient series reported in the literature. RESULTS Of the 48 patients, 20 had clean-contaminated wounds, 16 had contaminated wounds, and 12 were infected. 69% of the patients underwent an anterior perforator sparing components release for hernias that averaged 10.5 cm transversely (range 5 cm-25 cm). SSO occurred in 27% of patients while SSI was 19%. There were no fistulas or delayed suture sinuses. With a mean follow-up of almost 12 months, 3 midline hernias recurred (6%). In these same patients, three parastomal hernias repaired with mesh sutures failed out of 4 attempted for a total failure rate of 13%. CONCLUSION Mesh sutured closure represents a simplified and effective surgical strategy for contaminated midline incisional hernia repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory A Dumanian
- Divisions of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, United States.
| | - Steven T Lanier
- Divisions of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, United States
| | - Jason M Souza
- Divisions of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, United States
| | - Mimi Wu Young
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, United States
| | - Alexei S Mlodinow
- Divisions of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, United States
| | - Anne-Marie Boller
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, United States
| | - Kyle H Mueller
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, United States
| | - Amy L Halverson
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, United States
| | - Michael F McGee
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, United States
| | - Jonah J Stulberg
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, United States
| |
Collapse
|