Predictors of clinical responses to hypomethylating agents in acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes

Gene Expression and DNA Methylation Profiling Suggest Potential Biomarkers for Azacitidine Resistance in Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Myelodysplastic syndrome/neoplasm (MDS) comprises a group of heterogeneous hematopoietic disorders that present with genetic mutations and/or cytogenetic changes and, in the advanced stage, exhibit wide-ranging gene hypermethylation. Patients with higher-risk MDS are typically treated with repeated cycles of hypomethylating agents, such as azacitidine. However, some patients fail to respond to this therapy, and fewer than 50% show hematologic improvement. In this context, we focused on the potential use of epigenetic data in clinical management to aid in diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making. First, we used the F-36P MDS cell line to establish an azacitidine-resistant F-36P cell line. We performed expression profiling of azacitidine-resistant and parental F-36P cells and used biological and bioinformatics approaches to analyze candidate azacitidine-resistance-related genes and pathways. Eighty candidate genes were identified and found to encode proteins previously linked to cancer, chronic myeloid leukemia, and transcriptional misregulation in cancer. Interestingly, 24 of the candidate genes had promoter methylation patterns that were inversely correlated with azacitidine resistance, suggesting that DNA methylation status may contribute to azacitidine resistance. In particular, the DNA methylation status and/or mRNA expression levels of the four genes (AMER1, HSPA2, NCX1, and TNFRSF10C) may contribute to the clinical effects of azacitidine in MDS. Our study provides information on azacitidine resistance diagnostic genes in MDS patients, which can be of great help in monitoring the effectiveness of treatment in progressing azacitidine treatment for newly diagnosed MDS patients.

Integrated analysis and validation reveal CYTH4 as a potential prognostic biomarker in acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clonal hematological malignancy with high mortality rates. The identification of novel markers is urgent for AML. Cytohesins are a subfamily of guanine nucleotide exchange factors activating the ADP-ribosylation factor family GTPases. While the important roles of cytohesins have been reported in various cancers, their function in AML remains unclear. The present study aimed to explore the prognostic impact of cytohesin-4 (CYTH4) and the underlying molecular functions. RNA sequencing and AML clinical data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus databases to investigate gene expression and survival. Using the R software, differentially expressed genes were identified between the high- and the low-CYTH4 group. Functional enrichment analysis was conducted by Gene Ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, and Gene Set Enrichment Analyses. The CIBERSORTx tool was used to explore the proportions of different immune cell types. The molecular function of CYTH4 was also validated in vitro by examining cell growth, cell cycle, apoptosis and colony-forming ability. CYTH4 was significantly upregulated in AML compared with other cancers and normal tissues. High CYTH4 expression was associated with high white blood count (P=0.004) and higher risk status (P<0.001). Patients with high CYTH4 expression had poor overall survival (OS; HR=2.19; 95% CI, 1.40-3.44; P=0.0006; high vs. low) and event-free survival (EFS; HR=2.32; 95% CI, 1.43-3.75; P=0.0006; high vs. low), and these patients could benefit from transplantation (HR=0.29; 95% CI, 0.18-0.47; P<0.0001; transplantation vs. chemotherapy). Multivariate analysis showed that high CYTH4 expression was independently associated with inferior OS (HR=2.49; 95% CI, 1.28-4.83; P=0.007) and EFS (HR=2.56; 95% CI, 1.48-4.42; P=0.001). Functional analysis showed that CYTH4 was involved in immunoregulation. In vitro validation showed knockdown of CYTH4 adversely affected cell growth and induced cell apoptosis, while overexpression of CYTH4 enhanced cell growth. Taken together, CYTH4 is expressed at high levels in AML and can potentially function as a prognostic biomarker.

Cytidine deaminase status as a marker of response to azacytidine treatment in MDS and AML patients

Azacitidine (Aza) is a mainstay of treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) ineligible for induction chemotherapy and other high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Only half of patients respond, and almost all will eventually relapse. There are no predictive markers of response to Aza. Aza is detoxified in the liver by cytidine deaminase (CDA). Here, we investigated the association between CDA phenotype, toxicity and efficacy of Aza in real-world adult patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 15 months and 13 months in AML and high-risk MDS patients respectively. In addition, our data suggest that delaying Aza treatment was not associated with lack of efficacy and should not be considered a signal to switch to an alternative treatment. Half of the patients had deficient CDA activity (i.e. <2 UA/mg), with a lower proportion of deficient patients in MDS patients (34%) compared to AML patients (67%). In MDS patients, CDA deficiency correlated with longer landmark OS (14 vs. 8 months; p = 0.03), but not in AML patients. Taken together, our data suggest that CDA is an independent covariate and may therefore be a marker for predicting clinical outcome in MDS patients treated with Aza.

Postazacitidine clone size predicts long-term outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and related myeloid neoplasms

Azacitidine is a mainstay of therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)-related diseases. The purpose of our study is to elucidate the effect of gene mutations on hematological response and overall survival (OS), particularly focusing on their posttreatment clone size. We enrolled a total of 449 patients with MDS or related myeloid neoplasms. They were analyzed for gene mutations in pretreatment (n = 449) and posttreatment (n = 289) bone marrow samples using targeted-capture sequencing to assess the impact of gene mutations and their posttreatment clone size on treatment outcomes. In Cox proportional hazard modeling, multihit TP53 mutation (hazard ratio [HR], 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-2.91; P < .001), EZH2 mutation (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.14-2.54; P = .009), and DDX41 mutation (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.62; P < .001), together with age, high-risk karyotypes, low platelets, and high blast counts, independently predicted OS. Posttreatment clone size accounting for all drivers significantly correlated with International Working Group (IWG) response (P < .001, using trend test), except for that of DDX41-mutated clones, which did not predict IWG response. Combined, IWG response and posttreatment clone size further improved the prediction of the original model and even that of a recently proposed molecular prediction model, the molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M; c-index, 0.653 vs 0.688; P < .001, using likelihood ratio test). In conclusion, evaluation of posttreatment clone size, together with the pretreatment mutational profile as well as the IWG response play a role in better prognostication of azacitidine-treated patients with myelodysplasia.

Decreased FOXO1 Expression Is Correlated with Poor Prognosis in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndrome is one of the main hematological malignancies that threaten the health of the elderly. However, biomarkers which predict the progression and prognosis of MDS are still controversial and puzzling. FOXO1 gene plays an important role in a variety of intracellular functions, including tumor suppression and cellular immune regulation. However, there is no research report on the correlation between FOXO1 and the clinical features of MDS including immune environment. In this study, we observed that FOXO1 expression is associated with neutrophil count, blasts, chromosome and different MDS scoring systems. FOXO1 expression is closely related to MDS cell immune polarization, and the increase expression of FOXO1 is significantly related to the amplification of immune cell polarization ratio. In addition, FOXO1 expression is associated with progression-free survival and overall survival in MDS patients. Moreover, in a multivariate model FOXO1 low-expression was an independent predictor of poor survival in MDS. In summary, FOXO1 may play a candidate tumor suppressor in MDS, and FOXO1 is a useful independent prognostic predictor in MDS, and it may provide a candidate target therapy in future.

Whole human genome 5'-mC methylation analysis using long read nanopore sequencing

Methylation microarray and bisulphite sequencing are often used to study 5'-methylcytosine (5'-mC) modification of CpG dinucleotides in the human genome. Although both technologies produce trustworthy results, the evaluation of the methylation status of CpG sites suffers from the potential side effects of DNA modification by bisulphite and/or the ambiguity of mapping short reads in repetitive and highly homologous genomic regions, respectively. Nanopore sequencing is an attractive alternative for the study of 5'-mC since it allows sequencing of native DNA molecules, whereas the long reads produced by this technology help to increase the resolution of those genomic regions. In this work, we show that nanopore sequencing with 10X coverage depth, using DNA from a human cell line, produces 5'-mC methylation frequencies consistent with those obtained by 450k microarray, digital restriction enzyme analysis of methylation, and reduced representation bisulphite sequencing. High correlation between methylation frequencies obtained by nanopore sequencing and the other methodologies was also noticeable in either low or high GC content regions, including CpG islands and transcription start sites. We also showed that a minimum of five reads per CpG yields strong correlations (>0.89) in replicate nanopore sequencing runs and an almost uniform linearity of the methylation frequency variation between zero and one. Furthermore, nanopore sequencing was able to correctly display methylation frequency patterns based on genomic annotations of CpG regions. These results demonstrate that nanopore sequencing is a fast, robust, and reliable approach to the study of 5'-mC in the human genome with low coverage depth.

Volasertib as a monotherapy or in combination with azacitidine in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, or acute myeloid leukemia: summary of three phase I studies

BACKGROUND

This report summarizes three phase I studies evaluating volasertib, a polo-like kinase inhibitor, plus azacitidine in adults with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, or acute myeloid leukemia.

METHODS

Patients received intravenous volasertib in 28-day cycles (dose-escalation schedules). In Part 1 of 1230.33 (Study 1; NCT01957644), patients received 250-350 mg volasertib on day (D)1 and D15; in Part 2, patients received different schedules [A, D1: 170 mg/m²; B, D7: 170 mg/m²; C, D1 and D7: 110 mg/m²]. In 1230.35 (Study 2; NCT02201329), patients received 200-300 mg volasertib on D1 and D15. In 1230.43 (Study 3; NCT02721875), patients received 110 mg/m² volasertib on D1 and D8. All patients in Studies 1 and 2, and approximately half of the patients in Study 3, were scheduled to receive subcutaneous azacitidine 75 mg/m² on D1-7.

RESULTS

Overall, 22 patients were treated (17 with MDS; 12 previously untreated). Across Studies 1 and 2 (n = 21), the most common drug-related adverse events were hematological (thrombocytopenia [n = 11]; neutropenia [n = 8]). All dose-limiting toxicities were grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The only treated patient in Study 3 experienced 18 adverse events following volasertib monotherapy. Studies 1 and 2 showed preliminary activity (objective response rates: 25 and 40%).

CONCLUSIONS

The safety of volasertib with azacitidine in patients with MDS was consistent with other volasertib studies. All studies were terminated prematurely following the discontinuation of volasertib for non-clinical reasons by Boehringer Ingelheim; however, safety information on volasertib plus azacitidine are of interest for future studies in other diseases.

Platelet Doubling After First Decitabine Cycle Predicts Response and Survival of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients

OBJECTIVE

Although the effect of decitabine on myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) has been demonstrated, merely a proportion of patients respond to therapy, and no well-recognized predictors have been identified. This study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of decitabine in real-world clinical practice, and determine the predictive factors of response and overall survival (OS) in MDS patients.

METHODS

Clinical and pathological data were collected from 94 patients and analyzed. These patients were reclassified according to the 2016 World Health Organization classification criteria, and restratified by International Prognostic Scoring System prognostic scores. The response evaluation was performed according to the 2006 modified International Working Group response criteria.

RESULTS

In this study, 62% of patients responded to decitabine. Among these patients, 15 patients (16%) obtained complete remission (CR), 15 patients (16%) obtained marrow CR with hematologic improvement (HI), 20 patients (21%) obtained marrow CR without HI, and 8 patients (9%) only obtained HI, and no patient botained partial remission. The OS of the responders was significantly longer than that of non-responders (67 months vs. 7 months, P<0.001). The OS in patients with and without platelet doubling was significantly different in both the low/intermediate and high/very high risk groups (P=0.0398 and P=0.0330). The multivariate analysis revealed that platelet doubling after the first decitabine cycle is an independent predictor of response and OS in MDS patients (P=0.002 and P=0.008).

CONCLUSION

Decitabine is effective for treating MDS patients in real-world clinical practice. Furthermore, platelet doubling after the first decitabine cycle can be used as a predictor of response and survival in MDS patients.

Gene Expression Profiles Identify Biomarkers of Resistance to Decitabine in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disease characterized by inefficient hematopoiesis and the potential development of acute leukemia. Among the most notable advances in the treatment of MDS is the hypomethylating agent, decitabine (5-aza-2′deoxycytidine). Although decitabine is well known as an effective method for treating MDS patients, only a subset of patients respond and a tolerance often develops, leading to treatment failure. Moreover, decitabine treatment is costly and causes unnecessary toxicity. Therefore, clarifying the mechanism of decitabine resistance is important for improving its therapeutic efficacy. To this end, we established a decitabine-resistant F-36P cell line from the parental F-36P leukemia cell line, and applied a genetic approach employing next-generation sequencing, various experimental techniques, and bioinformatics tools to determine differences in gene expression and relationships among genes. Thirty-eight candidate genes encoding proteins involved in decitabine-resistant-related pathways, including immune checkpoints, the regulation of myeloid cell differentiation, and PI3K-Akt signaling, were identified. Interestingly, two of the candidate genes, AKT3 and FOS, were overexpressed in MDS patients with poor prognoses. On the basis of these results, we are pursuing development of a gene chip for diagnosing decitabine resistance in MDS patients, with the goal of ultimately improving the power to predict treatment strategies and the prognosis of MDS patients.

Current challenges and unmet medical needs in myelodysplastic syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a heterogeneous group of myeloid neoplasms that are characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, variable cytopenias, and a risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Most patients with MDS are affected by anemia and anemia-related symptoms, which negatively impact their quality of life. While many patients with MDS have lower-risk disease and are managed by existing treatments, there currently is no clear standard of care for many patients. For patients with higher-risk disease, the treatment priority is changing the natural history of the disease by delaying disease progression to acute myeloid leukemia and improving overall survival. However, existing treatments for MDS are generally not curative and many patients experience relapse or resistance to first-line treatment. Thus, there remains an unmet need for new, more effective but tolerable strategies to manage MDS. Recent advances in molecular diagnostics have improved our understanding of the pathogenesis of MDS, and it is becoming clear that the diverse nature of genetic abnormalities that drive MDS demands a complex and personalized treatment approach. This review will discuss some of the challenges related to the current MDS treatment landscape, as well as new approaches currently in development.

Pre-transplant therapy for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The value of pre-transplant cytoreductive therapy for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is controversial. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the effects of cytoreduction before transplantation.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Chinese databases were searched to identify studies comparing post-transplant outcomes in MDS patients receiving different pre-transplant therapy. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Eighteen reports were included. Post-transplant outcomes were similar for MDS patients receiving pre-transplant cytoreductive therapy and upfront transplantation in terms of overall survival (OS: HR, 0.92; 95 % CI, 0.79-1.07), relapse-free survival (RFS: HR, 1.18; 95 % CI, 0.94-1.47), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR: HR, 1.08; 95 % CI, 0.88-1.33), and non-relapse mortality (NRM: HR, 0.93; 95 % CI, 0.74-1.18). Pre-transplant hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and chemotherapy were not different regarding post-transplant OS, RFS, CIR, and NRM. Achieving complete remission (CR) before transplantation was associated with increased RFS (HR, 0.80; 95 %CI, 0.63-1.00) and decreased NRM (HR, 0.53; 95 % CI, 0.32-0.90) when compared with upfront transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Timely transplantation is of great value for MDS patients. Suitable pre-transplant cytoreduction could be used during the search for donors.

Low Plasma Citrate Levels and Specific Transcriptional Signatures Associated with Quiescence of CD34+ Progenitors Predict Azacitidine Therapy Failure in MDS/AML Patients

Simple Summary

Epigenetic drugs, such as azacitidine (AZA), hold promise in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), however, the mechanisms predicting the patients’ response to AZA is not completely understood. Quiescence of hematopoietic CD34⁺ progenitors has been proposed as a predictive factor for AZA therapy failure in MDS/AML patients, but the interplay between CD34⁺ cell cycle status and their metabolic signature in a predisposition to AZA (non)responsiveness remains unclear. Our data on patients with MDS or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) suggest that AZA-responders have actively cycling CD34⁺ cells poised for erythro-myeloid differentiation, with high metabolic activity controlling histone acetylation. Conversely, the patients who progressed early on AZA therapy revealed quiescence signature of their CD34⁺ cells, with signs of reduced metabolically-controlled acetylation of histones needed for transcription-permissive chromatin configuration. Our study delineates plasma citrate levels and CD34⁺ cells’ transcriptional signatures associated with cycling status and metabolic characteristics as factors predicting the response to AZA monotherapy in MDS/AML-MRC patients.

Abstract

To better understand the molecular basis of resistance to azacitidine (AZA) therapy in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC), we performed RNA sequencing on pre-treatment CD34⁺ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) isolated from 25 MDS/AML-MRC patients of the discovery cohort (10 AZA responders (RD), six stable disease, nine progressive disease (PD) during AZA therapy) and from eight controls. Eleven MDS/AML-MRC samples were also available for analysis of selected metabolites, along with 17 additional samples from an independent validation cohort. Except for two patients, the others did not carry isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1/2 mutations. Transcriptional landscapes of the patients’ HSPCs were comparable to those published previously, including decreased signatures of active cell cycling and DNA damage response in PD compared to RD and controls. In addition, PD-derived HSPCs revealed repressed markers of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, with IDH2 among the top 50 downregulated genes in PD compared to RD. Decreased citrate plasma levels, downregulated expression of the (ATP)-citrate lyase and other transcriptional/metabolic networks indicate metabolism-driven histone modifications in PD HSPCs. Observed histone deacetylation is consistent with transcription-nonpermissive chromatin configuration and quiescence of PD HSPCs. This study highlights the complexity of the molecular network underlying response/resistance to hypomethylating agents.

Comparison of Upfront Transplantation and Pretransplant Cytoreductive Therapy for Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only curative therapy for advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, the value of pretransplant cytoreduction remains debatable.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared the outcomes of upfront transplantation and pretransplant cytoreduction. Of 69 patients, 39 received upfront allo-HSCT and 30 received pretransplant cytoreduction, including chemotherapy (n = 16), hypomethylating agents (HMAs, n = 6), and HMAs with chemotherapy (n = 8).

RESULTS

The upfront group achieved similar overall survival (OS) and a trend of better progression-free survival (PFS) from diagnosis compared with the cytoreduction group (3-year PFS, 64.0% vs. 44.4%, P = .076). Posttransplant outcomes were comparable between the two groups in terms of OS, relapse-free survival (RFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). In patients with ≥2 mutations, the upfront group achieved better OS and PFS (3-year OS, 100.0% vs. 68.6%, P = .044; 3-year PFS: 92.3% vs. 43.9%, P = .016) than the cytoreduction group. Patients achieving remission in the cytoreduction group had outcomes similar to the upfront group, but those without remission before transplantation had a significantly worse posttransplant OS (3-year OS, 46.7% vs. 75.7%, P = .038). Patients with pretransplant HMAs had better PFS than those with chemotherapy or HMAs plus chemotherapy (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with pretransplant cytoreduction, upfront allo-HSCT might provide more benefit to some patients with advanced MDS if there are suitable donors. HMAs would be a good alternative during the donor search.

Expression, Regulation and Function of microRNA as Important Players in the Transition of MDS to Secondary AML and Their Cross Talk to RNA-Binding Proteins

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), heterogeneous diseases of hematopoietic stem cells, exhibit a significant risk of progression to secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) that are typically accompanied by MDS-related changes and therefore significantly differ to de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Within these disorders, the spectrum of cytogenetic alterations and oncogenic mutations, the extent of a predisposing defective osteohematopoietic niche, and the irregularity of the tumor microenvironment is highly diverse. However, the exact underlying pathophysiological mechanisms resulting in hematopoietic failure in patients with MDS and sAML remain elusive. There is recent evidence that the post-transcriptional control of gene expression mediated by microRNAs (miRNAs), long noncoding RNAs, and/or RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are key components in the pathogenic events of both diseases. In addition, an interplay between RBPs and miRNAs has been postulated in MDS and sAML. Although a plethora of miRNAs is aberrantly expressed in MDS and sAML, their expression pattern significantly depends on the cell type and on the molecular make-up of the sample, including chromosomal alterations and single nucleotide polymorphisms, which also reflects their role in disease progression and prediction. Decreased expression levels of miRNAs or RBPs preventing the maturation or inhibiting translation of genes involved in pathogenesis of both diseases were found. Therefore, this review will summarize the current knowledge regarding the heterogeneity of expression, function, and clinical relevance of miRNAs, its link to molecular abnormalities in MDS and sAML with specific focus on the interplay with RBPs, and the current treatment options. This information might improve the use of miRNAs and/or RBPs as prognostic markers and therapeutic targets for both malignancies.

Estrogen Receptors Alpha and Beta in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Estrogen receptor (ER) signaling has been widely studied in a variety of solid tumors, where the differential expression of ERα and ERβ subtypes can impact prognosis. ER signaling has only recently emerged as a target of interest in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), an aggressive hematological malignancy with sub-optimal therapeutic options and poor clinical outcomes. In a variety of tumors, ERα activation has proliferative effects, while ERβ targeting results in cell senescence or death. Aberrant ER expression and hypermethylation have been characterized in AML, making ER targeting in this disease of great interest. This review describes the expression patterns of ERα and ERβ in AML and discusses the differing signaling pathways associated with each of these receptors. Furthermore, we assess how these signaling pathways can be targeted by various selective estrogen receptor modulators to induce AML cell death. We also provide insight into ER targeting in AML and discuss pending questions that require further study.

Decitabine Response in Breast Cancer Requires Efficient Drug Processing and Is Not Limited by Multidrug Resistance

Dysregulation of DNA methylation is an established feature of breast cancers. DNA demethylating therapies like decitabine are proposed for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) and indicators of response need to be identified. For this purpose, we characterized the effects of decitabine in a panel of 10 breast cancer cell lines and observed a range of sensitivity to decitabine that was not subtype specific. Knockdown of potential key effectors demonstrated the requirement of deoxycytidine kinase (DCK) for decitabine response in breast cancer cells. In treatment-naïve breast tumors, DCK was higher in TNBCs, and DCK levels were sustained or increased post chemotherapy treatment. This suggests that limited DCK levels will not be a barrier to response in patients with TNBC treated with decitabine as a second-line treatment or in a clinical trial. Methylome analysis revealed that genome-wide, region-specific, tumor suppressor gene-specific methylation, and decitabine-induced demethylation did not predict response to decitabine. Gene set enrichment analysis of transcriptome data demonstrated that decitabine induced genes within apoptosis, cell cycle, stress, and immune pathways. Induced genes included those characterized by the viral mimicry response; however, knockdown of key effectors of the pathway did not affect decitabine sensitivity suggesting that breast cancer growth suppression by decitabine is independent of viral mimicry. Finally, taxol-resistant breast cancer cells expressing high levels of multidrug resistance transporter ABCB1 remained sensitive to decitabine, suggesting that the drug could be used as second-line treatment for chemoresistant patients.

The emergence of drug resistance to targeted cancer therapies: Clinical evidence

For many decades classical anti-tumor therapies included chemotherapy, radiation and surgery; however, in the last two decades, following the identification of the genomic drivers and main hallmarks of cancer, the introduction of therapies that target specific tumor-promoting oncogenic or non-oncogenic pathways, has revolutionized cancer therapeutics. Despite the significant progress in cancer therapy, clinical oncologists are often facing the primary impediment of anticancer drug resistance, as many cancer patients display either intrinsic chemoresistance from the very beginning of the therapy or after initial responses and upon repeated drug treatment cycles, acquired drug resistance develops and thus relapse emerges, resulting in increased mortality. Our attempts to understand the molecular basis underlying these drug resistance phenotypes in pre-clinical models and patient specimens revealed the extreme plasticity and adaptive pathways employed by tumor cells, being under sustained stress and extensive genomic/proteomic instability due to the applied therapeutic regimens. Subsequent efforts have yielded more effective inhibitors and combinatorial approaches (e.g. the use of specific pharmacologic inhibitors with immunotherapy) that exhibit synergistic effects against tumor cells, hence enhancing therapeutic indices. Furthermore, new advanced methodologies that allow for the early detection of genetic/epigenetic alterations that lead to drug chemoresistance and prospective validation of biomarkers which identify patients that will benefit from certain drug classes, have started to improve the clinical outcome. This review discusses emerging principles of drug resistance to cancer therapies targeting a wide array of oncogenic kinases, along with hedgehog pathway and the proteasome and apoptotic inducers, as well as epigenetic and metabolic modulators. We further discuss mechanisms of resistance to monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulators and immune checkpoint inhibitors, potential biomarkers of drug response/drug resistance, along with possible new therapeutic avenues for the clinicians to combat devastating drug resistant malignancies. It is foreseen that these topics will be major areas of focused multidisciplinary translational research in the years to come.

Epigenetic modifier gene mutations-positive AML patients with intermediate-risk karyotypes benefit from decitabine with CAG regimen

It remains unclear whether there is a relationship between therapeutic effects of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and epigenetic modifier gene mutations (EMMs) in patients with cytogenetically intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (IR-AML). Based on targeted-capture sequencing, we retrospectively analyzed the correlation between EMMs and prognosis in 83 IR-AML patients treated with decitabine in combination with cytarabine, aclarubicin hydrochloride and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (DCAG, n = 35) or "7 + 3" induction regimens (n = 48). In the multivariate analyses, EMM (+) patients did not show any statistically significant difference in remission rates from EMM (-) patients in the DCAG group (p > 0.05), but achieved inferior complete remission (CR; p = 0.03) and overall remission rates (ORR; p = 0.04) after the first course of standard induction regimens (p < 0.05). In the EMM (-) cohort, the DCAG group showed the tendency of adverse total CR (p = 0.06). Besides, DCAG group with EMMs achieved the best survival outcome independent of baseline characteristics, whereas it was opposite in EMM (+) patients receiving standard induction regimens (p < 0.05). Additionally, in the EMM (+) cohort, the survival rate of isolated DCAG group was statistically similar to that of the combination of standard chemotherapies and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) (p > 0.40), whereas patients who received only standard regimens had the worst survival rate (0.0%, p < 0.01). It can be concluded that the EMMs might be regarded as the potentially predictive biomarkers of better response to DCAG in IR-AML patients.

Selective inactivation of hypomethylating agents by SAMHD1 provides a rationale for therapeutic stratification in AML

Hypomethylating agents decitabine and azacytidine are regarded as interchangeable in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, their mechanisms of action remain incompletely understood, and predictive biomarkers for HMA efficacy are lacking. Here, we show that the bioactive metabolite decitabine triphosphate, but not azacytidine triphosphate, functions as activator and substrate of the triphosphohydrolase SAMHD1 and is subject to SAMHD1-mediated inactivation. Retrospective immunohistochemical analysis of bone marrow specimens from AML patients at diagnosis revealed that SAMHD1 expression in leukemic cells inversely correlates with clinical response to decitabine, but not to azacytidine. SAMHD1 ablation increases the antileukemic activity of decitabine in AML cell lines, primary leukemic blasts, and xenograft models. AML cells acquire resistance to decitabine partly by SAMHD1 up-regulation. Together, our data suggest that SAMHD1 is a biomarker for the stratified use of hypomethylating agents in AML patients and a potential target for the treatment of decitabine-resistant leukemia.

In acute myeloid leukemia, hypomethylating agents decitabine and azacytidine are used interchangeably. Here, the authors show that the major metabolite of decitabine, but not azacytidine, is subject to SAMHD1 inactivation, highlighting SAMHD1 as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target

[Changes of WT1 mRNA expression level in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes after hypomethylating agents and its prognostic significance]

Objective: To monitor the WT1 mRNA level and its dynamic changes in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) after hypomethylating agents (HMA) , as well as to assess the significance of WT1 mRNA levels and its dynamic changes in evaluating the efficacy of HMA and distinguishing the disease status of heterogeneous patients with stable disease (SD) . Methods: Bone marrow or peripheral blood samples of 56 patients with MDS who underwent hypomethylating agents (≥4 cycles) from November 2009 to March 2018 were tested by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the expression of WT1 mRNA, and to observe the correlation between the dynamic changes of WT1 mRNA expression and clinical efficacy and prognosis of patients. Results: WT1 mRNA expression levels of MDS patients decreased significantly after 3 cycles of hypomethylating agent treatment. Besides, the WT1 mRNA expression levels of patients increased significantly after diseases progression. According to the dynamic changes of WT1 mRNA expression levels during SD, 45 cases could be further divided into increased group and non-increased group. In those SD patients with increased WT1 mRNA expression level, the ratio of suffering disease progression or transformation to AML was 95.65% (22/23) , whereas the ratio turned to be 9.09% (2/22) for the non-increased group (χ(2)=33.852, P<0.001) . Compared with those SD patients reporting no increase in WT1 mRNA expression level, the overall survival[17 (95%CI 11-23) months vs not reached, P<0.001] and progression-free survival [13 (95%CI 8-18) months vs not reached, P<0.001] of those SD patients reporting increase in WT1 mRNA expression level were significantly shorter. Conclusion: WT1 mRNA expression level is a useful indicator to assess the efficacy of hypomethylating agents in MDS patients. Especially in patients with SD, detection of the changes in WT1 mRNA expression level is able to predict disease progression and help to make clinical decision.

Management of myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of response to hypomethylating agents

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are the standard of care for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, only around 50% of patients respond to these agents, and responses tend to be transient, with loss of response frequently happening within 2 years and being associated with very poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Identification of patients who will respond to HMAs is challenging. Mechanisms underlying resistance to HMAs are not clear yet. Recently, absence of response has been associated with increased cell-cycle quiescence among the hematopoietic progenitor cells. There are no standard-of-care options for patients after HMA failure. However, the increasing knowledge of MDS pathogenesis has led to the development of new potential therapies, including HMAs with longer half-life and exposure, inhibition of the antiapoptotic BCL2 protein with venetoclax or inhibition of immune-checkpoint regulatory proteins such as PD-1 or CTLA-4, innate immunity and targeting of CD33/CD3 with multiple monoclonal antibodies. In addition, multiple targeted agents are opening opportunities to treat subgroups of patients whose disease harbors mutations in TP53, IDH, FLT3, and genes involved in splicing machinery. Newer formulations of intensive chemotherapy and its different combinations may be considered a valid option in selected patients after HMA failure. Finally, decision making at the time of failure of response to HMAs should be personalized, taking into account that allogenic stem-cell transplantation remains the only therapeutic approach with curative potential in these patients. In the current review, we will focus on all the above aspects.

DNMT Inhibitors Increase Methylation in the Cancer Genome

DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) decitabine and azacytidine are approved therapies for myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia, and their combinations with other anticancer agents are being tested as therapeutic options for multiple solid cancers such as colon, ovarian, and lung cancer. However, the current therapeutic challenges of DNMTis include development of resistance, severe side effects and no or partial treatment responses, as observed in more than half of the patients. Therefore, there is a critical need to better understand the mechanisms of action of these drugs. In order to discover molecular targets of DNMTi therapy, we identified 638 novel CpGs with an increased methylation in response to decitabine treatment in HCT116 cell lines and validated the findings in multiple cancer types (e.g., bladder, ovarian, breast, and lymphoma) cell lines, bone marrow mononuclear cells from primary leukemia patients, as well as peripheral blood mononuclear cells and ascites from platinum resistance epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Azacytidine treatment also increased methylation of these CpGs in colon, ovarian, breast, and lymphoma cancer cell lines. Methylation at 166 identified CpGs strongly correlated (|r|≥ 0.80) with corresponding gene expression in HCT116 cell line. Differences in methylation at some of the identified CpGs and expression changes of the corresponding genes was observed in TCGA colon cancer tissue as compared to adjacent healthy tissue. Our analysis revealed that hypermethylated CpGs are involved in cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis by P53 and olfactory receptor pathways, hence influencing DNMTi responses. In conclusion, we showed hypermethylation of CpGs as a novel mechanism of action for DNMTi agents and identified 638 hypermethylated molecular targets (CpGs) common to decitabine and azacytidine therapy. These novel results suggest that hypermethylation of CpGs should be considered when predicting the DNMTi responses and side effects in cancer patients.